[0001] The present invention relates to a tamper-evident closure with a thin web of material
formed between the tamper-evident tabs. The invention also relates to a tamper-evident
closure and container combination.
[0002] Tamper-evident closures of various types have been used in the past on containers
to enable the user of a product to determine whether the container has been opened.
Such closures have commonly been made of aluminum or plastic.
[0003] One type of closure includes an upper cap portion and a lower security ring or band
which is attached to the cap portion by a failure line. When the cap is removed. the
closure breaks along the failure line, leaving the ring separate from the cap portion.
Often the security ring is heated and rolled under a shoulder of the container: plastic
closures of this type are described in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,673,761 and 4,033,472.
[0004] U.S. Patent Nos. 4,506,795 and 4,595,110 describe tamper-evident closures with tamper-indicating
tabs which fold upwardly and inwardly and lock against the lower surface of an annular
shoulder on a container neck to retain the tamper indicating means on the neck as
the cap is removed. The tamper indicating means has a ring to which the tabs are integrally
connected at their lower outer ends. The tabs are resilient and are flexed by the
container finish at the joints where they are joined to the ring. These closures may
be installed simply by screwing them onto a container neck in a one step process.
The flexible tabs guide the closure and center it as it is lowered onto the container
neck for installation. They do not require the holding of the closure or the container
finish to close tolerances. However. there is a small chance in such a system that
flexible tabs may turn outwardly during shipment.
[0005] There is a need for an improved tamper evident closure which may be simply installed
on a container finish and yet will not suffer the drawbacks of inadvertent outwardly
flexing tabs.
[0006] These and other needs are met by the tamper-evident closure and the tamper-evident
closure and container combination of the present invention. A tamper-evident closure
is provided for sealing an open-topped container. A container of the present invention
has an external screw thread formed on the neck of the container and an outwardly
projecting annular shoulder formed below the screw thread on the container. A closure
of the present invention has an internally threaded closure which may be removed from
the container for dispensing the contents of the container. The closure has a base
wall for extending across the open top of the container, an annular sidewall integrally
joined to the base wall about the periphery of the base wall and depending from it,
and tamper-indicating features. The tamper-indicating features include a pilfer ring
depending from the annular sidewall and located axially in vertical alignment with
the sidewall, a number of flexible tabs connected to the pilfer ring capable of being
bent upward and radially inward from the pilfer ring for contacting the annular shoulder
of the container during removal of the closure to prevent the pilfer ring and tamper-indicating
features from traveling upward beyond the annular shoulder with the rest of the closure.
As such the pilfer ring then breaks away from the closure. The tamper indicating features
also include webbed areas located between the flexible tabs to prevent the flexible
tabs from flexing outwardly.
[0007] The closure may be advantageously made of plastic.
[0008] The tabs in the present invention join the pilfer ring along folded joints, and the
tabs are spaced from each other in a circumferential direction. The cross-sectional
thickness of the tabs may be substantially equal to the cross-sectional thickness
of the pilfer ring portion to which they are joined. The tabs are preferably substantially
rectangular in shape and project upwardly and inwardly. The webbed areas are also
substantially rectangular in shape, however, the cross-sectional thickness of the
webbed areas is substantially less than the cross-sectional thickness of the tabs.
[0009] By way of example, the invention will be further described with reference to the
accompanying drawings in which:-
FIG 1 shows a side view of an embodiment of a closure of the present invention with
webbing between the tabs;
FIG 2 shows a side view of an embodiment of a container of the present invention with
an annular shoulder ;
FIG 3 shows a side view of an embodiment of a closure of the present invention, with
the tabs in a flexed position just prior to installation on a container neck ; and
FIG 4 shows a side view of an embodiment of a closure of the prior art, with the tabs
in an undesired "tab-out" condition.
[0010] FIG 1 illustrates an embodiment of a closure 2 of the present invention. Closure
2 has a base wall 112. Depending from the periphery of the base wall 112 is an annular
sidewall 110. The interior of the annular sidewall 110 has threads for engaging corresponding
threads on a container neck. The annular sidewall 110 is frangibly connected to a
pilfer ring 125 through a weakened area 124.
[0011] Depending from the pilfer ring 125 are a series of tabs 121a, 121b, 121c...., 121n.
In this application, if an individual tab is mentioned, the term "tab(s) 121k" will
be used. However, if characteristics of all of the tabs are discussed the general
term "tabs 121" will be utilized. The tabs 121 are spaced circumferentially from each
other. Between the tabs are placed webs 123a, 123b, 123c...., 123n, which tend to
tie the movement of one tab 123k to the movement of its neighboring tabs 123(k-1)
and 123(k+1). These webbed portions are preferably rectangular in shape so as to well-match
the space between the tabs. The webs 123 generally do not extend as far, in a downward
direction, as do the tabs 121. The thickness of the material from which the webs 123
are constructed is also preferably less than that of the tabs 121, so as to allow
a reasonable amount of flexibility.
[0012] FIG 2 shows an embodiment of a container 200 of the present invention has a shoulder
204 from which a neck 203 extends upwardly. The neck 203 has opening 205 through which
the contents of the container 200 may be dispensed. The exterior of neck 203 has threads
201 which threadingly engage corresponding threads on the interior of the annular
sidewall. Finally, the neck 203 has an annular shoulder 202 which provides a projection
which tabs 121 may push against so as to hold the pilfer ring 125 below the annular
shoulder.
[0013] When the closure 2 is used to seal the open mouth of the container 200. the closure
2 is installed by being screw-threaded onto the neck 203 of the container 200.
[0014] Prior to the capping operation, the tabs 121 must be flexed inward so that they extend
radially and inwardly, pointing towards the interior of the ciosure 2. as shown in
FIG 3. Once the tabs 121 are flexed inwardly, the closure 2 may be placed onto the
container 200. During this installation procedure, the tabs 121, so flexed, contact
the threads 201 but travel over them. The tabs 121 also travel over the annular shoulder
202. Once past these obstructions, the tabs 121 flex slightly inwardly toward the
central axis of the closure 2.
[0015] This flexing of the tabs 121 inhibits upward motion of the closure 2 because the
tabs 121 engage the annular shoulder 202 but may not pass back over the shoulder 202.
Thus, the tabs 121 hold the pilfer ring 125 onto the container neck 203, which in
turn holds the closure 2 onto the container neck 203 via the weakened area 124.
[0016] When a user wishes to dispense some or all of the contents of the container 200,
the user rotates the closure 2 off of the container 200. This rotational motion is,
of course, translated into an upward force by the action of the threads. As the closure
2 is forced upward, tension is exerted on the weakened area 124 because the upward
motion of the closure 2 is countered by the downward force of the tabs 121 against
the annular shoulder 202. That is, the tabs 121 keep the pilfer ring 125 at or below
the level of the annular shoulder 202, while the user's rotation of the closure 2
forces the closure 2 upward.
[0017] After more rotation of the closure 2, and its subsequent upward motion, enough tension
is placed on the weakened area 124 that it ruptures and breaks. This frangible quality
of the weakened area 124 thus allows the closure 2 to be removed from the container
neck 203 while leaving in place, under the annular shoulder 202, the pilfer ring 125
and tabs 121. The presence of the pilfer ring 125 and tabs 121, separated from the
closure 2, thus alerts the user that the closure's seal has been broken and that at
least one person has gained entry to the closure prior to its use by the user.
[0018] The presence of the tabs 121 also assist in the initial installation of the closure
2 onto the container 200. This is because the inwardly flexed tabs 121 tend to guide
the closure 2 onto the container neck 203 during installation, even if the alignment
of the closure 2 and the container neck 203 is not exact. In particular, if the alignment
is not exact, the tabs 121 tend to push the closure 2 and or container 200 into alignment.
[0019] FIG 4 demonstrates the situation where no webs are between the tabs. Wall 412 has
depending skirt 410. Tabs 421a, 421b, etc. surround the base. It is clear that, in
both the initial installation and the operation of the tabs to produce a tamper-evident
feature, that the tamper-evident result is defeated if one or more tabs inadvertently
flex outward at any time prior to installation, as is shown in FIG 4. Such a "tab-out"
condition may occur during shipment or during the installation itself. As may be seen
from FIG 4, the tab-out condition is exacerbated by the independence of movement of
individual tabs 421k. In other words. because the movement of one tab 421k is not
connected in any way to the movement of another, once a tab 421(k-1) has flexed outward,
its neighboring tabs 421(k-2) and 121k do not influence its movement. In particular,
the neighboring tabs do not serve to pull the tab 121(k-1) back in line.
[0020] FIG 3 shows that, in addition to the inventive features discussed above, the present
invention also includes webs 123 placed between the tabs 121. The webs 123 are advantageously
present just near the base of the tabs 121, in particular, at the folded joints where
the tabs 121 connect with the pilfer ring 125. However, the webs 123 may extend even
as far as the tabs 121 themselves. Generally, the webs are made of a similar material
as the closure, but their thickness is generally less so as to not inhibit the tabs'
inward movement. These webs prevent the outward flexing of the tabs 121 by connecting
the movement of one tab 121k with the movement of its neighboring tabs 121(k-1) and
121(k+1). In this way, the webs 123 serve to keep the tabs 121 from flexing outward
by providing tension against outward movements in which the average distance between
points on adjacent tabs 121 becomes relatively large. The webs 123 do not, however,
prevent the tabs 121 from flexing inward because the inward flex tends to decrease
the distance between the tabs 121. That is, the webs 123 are useful for preventing
the tab-out condition, but do not inhibit the effectiveness of the tabs 121 in providing
a tamper-evident feature.
[0021] The weakened area 124 may include, for example, a circumferential cut in a series
of frangible connecting posts (not shown) which hold the pilfer ring 125 to the rest
of the closure 2. The circumferential cut is made in the pilfer ring (or above the
pilfer ring), which cut can be such that few of the connecting posts remain, or most
of the connecting posts survive the cutting, as desired. As the present invention
includes a pilfer ring 125 with tabs 121 and webs 123, the volume of the closure 2
below the weakened area 124 is relatively heavy. As such, the frangible connecting
posts, in this example, may need to be manufactured in an especially strong manner
to ensure that the pilfer ring does not break away during installation. It has been
found that a preferable width and thickness of such a connecting post lies in the
range of .010 to .025 in. The preferred materials are polyolefins such as polystyrene
or polypropylene.
[0022] From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that an improved tamper-evident closure
is provided by the present invention. While a certain embodiment of the present invention
has been shown and described herein, there is no intent to limit the invention by
this description. The invention extends to all modifications and alternate constructions
falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
1. A tamper-evident internally threaded closure for sealing a container having an external
screw thread formed on a neck of the container and an outwardly projecting annular
shoulder formed below the screw thread on the container, the closure comprising:
a base wall;
an annular sidewall integrally joined to the base wall about the periphery of the
base wall and depending therefrom;
a pilfer ring frangibly depending from the annular sidewall, said pilfer ring being
located axially in vertical alignment with said sidewall;
a plurality of flexible tabs connected to the pilfer ring capable of being bent
upward and radially inwardly from the pilfer ring for engaging the annular shoulder
of the container during removal of the closure to prevent the pilfer ring from traveling
upward beyond the annular shoulder with the closure and to break the pilfer ring away
from the closure; and
a plurality of webbed areas located between the flexible tabs to prevent the flexible
tabs from flexing outwardly.
2. The closure of claim 1, wherein the closure is made of plastic
3. The closure of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein folded joints join the tabs to the pilfer
ring, the tabs being spaced from each other in a circumferential direction.
4. The closure of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the tabs have a cross-sectional
thickness substantially equal to the cross-sectional thickness of the pilfer ring
portion to which they are joined.
5. The closure of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the tabs are substantially
rectangular in shape and project upwardly and inwardly.
6. The closure of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the webbed areas are substantially
rectangular in shape.
7. The closure of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the cross-sectional thickness
of the webbed areas is substantially less than the cross-sectional thickness of the
tabs.
8. The closure of any one of the preceding claims, further comprising a plurality of
connecting posts frangibly connecting the pilfer ring with the annular sidewall.
9. The closure of any one of the preceding claims, wherein said pilfer ring and said
annular sidewall are separated by a circumferential cut, such that said cut defines
a weakened area.
10. A tamper-evident closure and container combination, comprising:
an open-topped container having an external thread formed on a neck on the container
and an outwardly projecting annular shoulder formed below the screw thread on the
container;
an internally threaded closure according to any one of the preceding claims.
11. The combination of the claim 10, wherein the closure and container are made of plastic.
12. The combination of claim 10, wherein said container is made of glass.