FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to methods of laundering which employ one or more types
of detersive enzymes and a bleaching system with one or more bleach activators.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Various types of detersive enzymes have long been conventionally used in laundry
detergents to assist in the removal of certain stains from fabrics. These stains are
typically associated with lipid and protein soils. The enzymes, however, have proven
less effective against other types of soils and stains.
[0003] It has also long been known that peroxygen bleaches are effective for stain and/or
soil removal from fabrics, but that such bleaches are temperature dependent. At a
laundry liquor temperature of 60°C, peroxygen bleaches are only partially effective.
As the laundry liquor temperature is lowered below 60°C, peroxygen bleaches become
relatively ineffective. As a consequence, there has been a substantial amount of industrial
research to develop bleaching systems which contain an activator that renders peroxygen
bleaches effective at laundry liquor temperatures below 60°C.
[0004] Numerous substances have been disclosed in the art as effective bleach activators.
One widely-used activator is tetraacetyl ethylene diamine (TAED). TAED provides effective
hydrophilic cleaning especially on beverage stains, but has limited performance on
dingy, yellow stains such as those resulting from body oils. Fortunately, another
type of activator, such as nonanoyloxybenzenesulfonate (NOBS) and other activators
which generally comprise long chain alkyl moieties, is hydrophobic in nature and provides
excellent performance on dingy stains.
[0005] It would seem that a combination of enzymes with either hydrophilic or hydrophobic
bleach activators, or both, would provide an effective "all-around" detergent composition
which would perform well on most types of soils and stains. However, a hindrance to
the development of such all-around cleaning compositions has been the discovery that
many of the hydrophobic bleach activators developed thus far can promote damage to
natural rubber parts used in certain washing machines. Because of the negative effects
on washing machine parts, the selection of such detergent-added bleaching systems
has been limited. This is especially true for European detergent/bleaches, since many
washing machines manufactured in Europe are equipped with key parts, such as sump
hoses and motor gaskets, made of natural rubber.
[0006] Another problem in developing an all-around cleaning composition has been finding
a cleaning agent that is effective under heavy soil load conditions. The removal of
heavy soil levels, especially nucleophilic and body soils, has proven especially difficult
for conventional bleaching systems. Under such circumstances, conventional activators
such as NOBS appear to interact with, and be destroyed by, heavy soil loads before
they can optimally provide their intended bleaching function. Still another problem
has been the stability of enzymes, especially lipases and proteases, in the presence
of bleaches.
[0007] A need, therefore, exists for a method which provides effective cleaning performance
over a wide variety of soils and stains. Moreover, the method should provide effective
cleaning performance without substantially damaging natural rubber machine parts.
In addition, the method should provide both bleaching performance and enzyme cleaning
performance.
[0008] Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that typical hydrophobic
bleach activators undergo a perhydrolysis reaction to form a peroxyacid bleaching
agent. However, a typical by-product of the perhydrolysis reaction between conventional
bleach activators and hydrogen peroxide is a diacylperoxide (DAP) species. Unfortunately,
DAP species derived from hydrophobic activators tend to be insoluble, poorly dispersible,
oily materials which form a residue which can deposit on the natural rubber machine
parts that are exposed to the laundry liquor. The oily DAP residue can form a film
on the natural rubber machine parts and promote free radical and peroxide damage to
the rubber, which eventually leads to failure of the parts.
[0009] By the present invention, it has now been discovered that the class of hydrophobic
bleach activators derived from amido acids forms hydrophobic amido peracids upon perhydrolysis
without the production of harmful, oily DAP's. Again, while not intending to be limited
by theory, it is believed that the DAP's produced by the perhydrolysis reaction of
the amido acid-derived bleach activators used herein are insoluble crystalline solids.
The solids do not form a coating film; therefore, the natural rubber parts are not
exposed to the DAP's for extended periods of time and remain substantially undamaged.
[0010] In addition to the amido acid-derived bleach activators, it has also now been discovered
that the class of bleach activators derived from N-acyl caprolactams provide both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic bleaching action without the production of harmful DAP
by-products.
[0011] Additionally, it has also now been discovered that the class of benzoxazintype bleach
activators provide effective hydrophobic bleaching action without the production of
harmful DAP by-products.
[0012] Surprisingly, it has also been discovered that certain enzymes, particularly lipase
enzymes, are compatible with said classes of bleach activators.
[0013] Accordingly, the present invention solves the long-standing need for methods which
provide efficient and effective performance over a wide range of cleaning needs by
combining the cleaning actions of enzymes with the hydrophobic cleaning action of
amido derived bleach activators or with the hydrophobic and hydrophilic cleaning action
of N-acyl caprolactam bleach activators. The invention also provides efficient and
effective methods for washing machines which have parts made of natural rubber, such
that the natural rubber is substantially undamaged by the bleaching system. These
and other benefits are secured by the invention, as will be seen hereinafter.
BACKGROUND ART
[0014] U.S. Patent 4,634,551, Burns et al, issued January 6, 1987, discloses amido peroxyacid
bleaching compounds and their precursors which are employed in the present invention.
See also, U.S. Patent 4,852,989, Burns et al, issued August 1, 1989. U.S. Patent 5,069,809,
Lagerwaard et al, issued Dec. 3, 1991 discloses the combination of NOBS bleach activators
with LIPOLASE, lipase enzymes. See E.P. Patent 341,947, Lagerwaard, et al, published
November 15, 1989 for a discussion of the compatibility problems of lipase enzymes
with certain bleaching systems. U.S. Patent 4,545,784, Sanderson, issued October 8,
1985, discloses the absorption of activators onto sodium perborate monohydrate.
[0015] EP-A-0170386 and EP-A-0290292 describe amido-derived bleach activators and its corresponding
peracids. Enzymes such as proteases or amylases may also be included within the bleaching
compositions.
[0016] DE-A-3938526 discloses benzoxazin bleach activators in washing and cleaning compositions
which may contain, among various auxiliaries, enzymes.
[0017] EP-A-0122763 discloses bleach activators such as N-acetyl caprolactam adsorbed onto
perborate. Enzymes can optionally be included within the compositions.
[0018] WO-A-94/10284 (54.3 document) discloses a granular detergent composition comprising
an amido-derived bleach activator and a protease enzyme.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0019] The invention herein provides methods which are safe for use in contact with natural
rubber, and which provide not only bleach performance, but also good detersive enzyme
stability and performance.
[0020] The present invention encompasses methods, which use compositions comprising an effective
amount of one or more types of enzymes and a bleaching system comprising at least
0.1%, by weight, of a peroxygen bleaching compound and at least 0.1%, by weight, of
one or more bleach activators, wherein said bleach activators are members selected
from the group consisting of:
a) a bleach activator of the general formula:

or mixtures thereof, wherein R1 is an alkyl, aryl, or alkaryl group containing from 1 to 14 carbon atoms, R2 is an alkylene, arylene or alkarylene group containing from 1 to 14 carbon atoms,
R5 is H or an alkyl, aryl, or alkaryl group containing from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, and
L is a leaving group;
b) benzoxazin-type bleach activators of the general formula:

wherein R1 is H, alkyl, alkaryl, aryl, arylalkyl, and wherein R2, R3, R4, and R5 may be the same or different substituents selected from H, halogen, alkyl, alkenyl,
aryl, hydroxyl, alkoxyl, amino, alkylamino, COOR6 (wherein R6 is H or an alkyl group) and carbonyl functions;
c) N-acyl caprolactam bleach activators of the formula:

wherein R6 is H or an alkyl, aryl, alkoxyaryl or alkaryl group containing from 1 to 12 carbons;
and
d) mixtures of a), b) and c).
[0021] Preferably, the molar ratio of hydrogen peroxide yielded by the peroxygen bleaching
compound to bleach activator is greater than 1.0. Most preferably, the molar ratio
of hydrogen peroxide to bleach activator is at least 1.5.
[0022] Preferred bleach activators of type a) are those wherein R
1 is an alkyl group containing from 6 to 12 carbon atoms, R
2 contains from 1 to 8 carbon atoms, and R
5 is H or methyl. Particularly preferred bleach activators are those of the above general
formulas wherein R
1 is an alkyl group containing from 7 to 10 carbon atoms and R
2 contains from 4 to 5 carbon atoms.
[0023] Preferred bleach activators of type b) are those wherein R
2, R
3, R
4, and R
5 are H and R
1 is a phenyl group.
[0024] The preferred acyl moieties of said N-acyl caprolactam bleach activators of type
c) have the formula R
6-CO- wherein R
6 is H or an alkyl, aryl, alkoxyaryl, or alkaryl group containing from 1 to 12 carbons,
preferably from 6 to 12 carbon atoms. In highly preferred embodiments, R
6 is a member selected from the group consisting of phenyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, 2,4,4-trimethylpentyl,
decenyl and mixtures thereof.
[0025] Other highly preferred methods use detergent compositions comprising bleach activators
selected from the group consisting of:
a) a bleach activator of the formula:

or mixtures thereof, wherein R1 is an alkyl, aryl, or alkaryl group containing from 1 to 14 carbon atoms, R2 is an alkylene, arylene or alkarylene group containing from 1 to 14 carbon atoms,
R5 is H or an alkyl, aryl, or alkaryl group containing from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, and
L is a leaving group;
b) a N-acyl caprolactam bleach activator of the formula:

wherein R6 is H or an alkyl, aryl, alkoxyaryl, or alkaryl group containing from 1 to 12 carbons;
and
c) mixtures of a) and b);
and an enzyme selected from the group consisting of SAVINASE, Protease C, and mixtures
thereof. Highly preferred activators include benzoyl caprolactam, nonanoyl caprolactam,
(6-octanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate, (6nonanamidocaproyl)oxy-benzenesulfonate,
(6decanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate, and mixtures thereof.
[0026] The peroxygen bleaching compound can be any peroxide source, and is preferably a
member selected from the group consisting of sodium perborate monohydrate, sodium
perborate tetrahydrate, sodium pyrophosphate peroxyhydrate, urea peroxyhydrate, sodium
percarbonate, sodium peroxide and mixtures thereof. Preferred peroxygen bleaching
compounds are selected from the group consisting of sodium perborate monohydrate,
sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate tetrahydrate and mixtures thereof. A highly
preferred peroxygen bleaching compound is sodium percarbonate.
[0027] The amido-derived and caprolactam bleach activators herein can also be used in combination
with rubber-safe, enzyme-safe, hydrophilic activators such as TAED, typically at weight
ratios of amido-derived or caprolactam activators:TAED in the range of 1:5 to 5:1,
preferably about 1:1.
[0028] The methods herein are effective with all manner of detersive enzymes, e.g., members
selected from the group consisting of proteases, amylases, lipases, cellulases, peroxidases
and mixtures thereof. Highly preferred are lipase enzymes derived from the fungus
Humicola lanuginosa, optionally as expressed in
Aspergillus oryzae as host using art-disclosed genetic engineering techniques. Also highly preferred
are modified protease bacterial serine protease enzymes obtained from
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus lentus or
Bacillus licheniformis. Said enzymes comprise at least 0.001%, preferably from 0.001% to 5%, of the detergent
compositions.
[0029] The method can be carried out at temperatures below 60°C but, of course, is quite
effective and is still safe to rubber parts at laundry temperatures up to the boil.
The aqueous laundry liquor comprises usually at least 300 ppm of conventional detergent
ingredients, as well as at least 25 ppm of bleach activator and at least 25 ppm of
bleaching compound. Preferably, said aqueous liquor comprises from 900 ppm to 20,000
ppm of the conventional detergent ingredients, from 100 ppm to 25,000 ppm of bleaching
compound and from 100 ppm to 2,500 ppm of said bleach activator.
[0030] The conventional detergent ingredients employed in said method comprise generally
from 1% to 99.8%, preferably from 5% to 80%, of a detersive surfactant. Optionally,
detersive compositions can also comprise from 5% to 80% of a detergent builder. Other
optional detersive ingredients are also encompassed by the fully-formulated detergent/bleach
compositions provided by this invention.
[0031] All percentages, ratios and proportions are by weight, unless otherwise specified.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0032] The detergent compositions employed in the present invention provide effective and
efficient surface cleaning of fabrics which thereby removes stains and/or soils from
the fabrics. The bleaching systems in combination with one or more types of enzymes
are particularly efficient at removing most types of soils from the fabrics, including
protein and lipid soils, dingy soils, and heavy soil loads, especially from nucleophilic
and body soils.
[0033] The superior bleaching/cleaning action of the present compositions is achieved with
safety to natural rubber machine parts and other natural rubber articles, including
fabrics containing natural rubber and natural rubber elastic materials. The bleaching
mechanism and, in particular, the surface bleaching mechanism are not completely understood.
However, it is generally believed that the bleach activator undergoes nucleophilic
attack by a perhydroxide anion, which is generated from the hydrogen peroxide evolved
by the peroxygen bleach, to form a peroxycarboxylic acid. This reaction is commonly
referred to as perhydrolysis.
[0034] The bleaching systems and activators herein afford additional advantages in that,
unexpectedly, they are safer to fabrics and cause less color damage than other activators
when used in the manner provided by this invention.
[0035] It is also believed that the bleach activators within the invention can render peroxygen
bleaches more efficient even at laundry liquor temperatures wherein bleach activators
are not necessary to activate the bleach, i.e., above about 60°C. Therefore, with
bleach systems of the invention, less peroxygen bleach is required to get the same
level of surface bleaching performance as is obtained with the peroxygen bleach alone.
[0036] The bleaching systems, wherein the bleach activator is used, also have as an essential
component a peroxygen bleach capable of releasing hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution.
The Bleach Activator
[0037] Amido Derived Bleach Activators - The bleach activators of type a) employed in the present invention are amide substituted
compounds of the general formulas:

or mixtures thereof, wherein R
1, R
2 and R
5 are as defined above and L can be essentially any suitable leaving group. A leaving
group is any group that is displaced from the bleaching activator as a consequence
of the nucleophilic attack on the bleach activator by the perhydroxide anion. This,
the perhydrolysis reaction, results in the formation of the peroxycarboxylic acid.
Generally, for a group to be a suitable leaving group it must exert an electron attracting
effect. It should also form a stable entity so that the rate of the back reaction
is negligible. This facilitates the nucleophilic attack by the perhydroxide anion.
[0038] The L group must be sufficiently reactive for the reaction to occur within the optimum
time frame (e.g., a wash cycle). However, if L is too reactive, this activator will
be difficult to stabilize for use in a bleaching composition. These characteristics
are generally paralleled by the pKa of the conjugate acid of the leaving group, although
exceptions to this convention are known. Ordinarily, leaving groups that exhibit such
behavior are those in which their conjugate acid has a pKa in the range of from 4
to 13, preferably from about 6 to about 11 and most preferably from 8 to 11.
[0039] Preferred bleach activators are those of the above general formula wherein R
1, R
2 and R
5 are as hereinabove defined and L is selected from the group consisting of:

and mixtures thereof, wherein R
1 is an alkyl, aryl, or alkaryl group containing from 1 to 14 carbon atoms, R
3 is an alkyl chain containing from 1 to 8 carbon atoms, R
4 is H or R
3, and Y is H or a solubilizing group.
[0040] The preferred solubilizing groups are -SO
3-M
+, -CO
2-M
+, -SO
4-M
+, -N
+(R
3)
4X
- and O<--N(R
3)
3 and most preferably -SO
3-M
+ and -CO
2-M
+ wherein R
3 is an alkyl chain containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms, M is a cation which provides
solubility to the bleach activator and X is an anion which provides solubility to
the bleach activator. Preferably, M is an alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium
cation, with sodium and potassium being most preferred, and X is a halide, hydroxide,
methylsulfate or acetate anion. It should be noted that bleach activators with a leaving
group that does not contain a solubilizing groups should be well dispersed in the
bleaching solution in order to assist in their dissolution.
[0041] Preferred bleach activators are those of the above general formula wherein L is selected
from the group consisting of:

wherein R
3 is as defined above and Y is -SO
3-M
+ or -CO
2-M
+ wherein M is as defined above.
[0042] Another important class of bleach activators, including those of type b) and type
c), provide organic peracids as described herein by ring-opening as a consequence
of the nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon of the cyclic ring by the perhydroxide
anion. For instance, this ring-opening reaction in type c) activators involves attack
at the caprolactam ring carbonyl by hydrogen peroxide or its anion. Since attack of
an acyl caprolactam by hydrogen peroxide or its anion occurs preferably at the exocyclic
carbonyl, obtaining a significant fraction of ring-opening may require a catalyst.
Another example of ring-opening bleach activators can be found in type b) activators,
such as those disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,966,723, Hodge et al, issued Oct. 30, 1990.
[0043] Such activator compounds disclosed by Hodge include the activators of the benzoxazin-type,
having the formula:

including the substituted benzoxazins of the type

wherein R
1 is H, alkyl, alkaryl, aryl, arylalkyl, and wherein R
2, R
3, R
4, and R
5 may be the same or different substituents selected from H, halogen, alkyl, alkenyl,
aryl, hydroxyl, alkoxyl, amino, alkyl amino, COOR
6 (wherein R
6 is H or an alkyl group) and carbonyl functions.
[0044] A preferred activator of the benzoxazin-type is:

[0045] When the activators are used, optimum surface bleaching performance is obtained with
washing solutions wherein the pH of such solution is between 8.5 and 10.5 and preferably
between 9.5 and 10.5 in order to facilitate the perhydrolysis reaction. Such pH can
be obtained with substances commonly known as buffering agents, which are optional
components of the bleaching systems herein.
[0046] The N-Acyl Caprolactam Bleach Activators - The N-acyl caprolactam bleach activators of type c) employed in the present invention
have the formula:

wherein R
6 is H or an alkyl, aryl, alkoxyaryl, or alkaryl group containing from 1 to 12 carbons.
Caprolactam activators wherein the R
6 moiety contains at least 6, preferably from 6 to 12, carbon atoms provide hydrophobic
bleaching which affords nucleophilic and body soil clean-up, as noted above. Caprolactam
activators wherein R
6 comprises from 1 to 6 carbon atoms provide hydrophilic bleaching species which are
particularly efficient for bleaching beverage stains. Mixtures of hydrophobic and
hydrophilic caprolactams, typically at weight ratios of 1:5 to 5:1, preferably 1:1,
can be used herein for mixed stain removal benefits.
[0047] Highly preferred N-acyl caprolactams are selected from the group consisting of benzoyl
caprolactam, octanoyl caprolactam, nonanoyl caprolactam, 3,5,5trimethylhexanoyl caprolactam,
decanoyl caprolactam, undecenoyl caprolactam, and mixtures thereof.
[0048] Methods for making N-acyl caprolactams are well known in the art. Examples I and
II, included below, illustrate preferred laboratory syntheses.
[0049] Contrary to the teachings of U.S. Pat. 4,545,784, cited above, the bleach activator
is preferably not absorbed onto the peroxygen bleaching compound. To do so in the
presence of other organic detersive ingredients could cause safety problems.
[0050] The bleach activators of type a), b) or c) will comprise at least 0.1%, preferably
from 0.1% to 50%, more preferably from 1% to 30%, most preferably from 3% to 25%,
by weight of bleaching system or detergent composition.
[0051] When the activators are used, optimum surface bleaching performance is obtained with
washing solutions wherein the pH of such solution is between 8.5 and 10.5 and preferably
between 9.5 and 10.5 in order to facilitate the perhydrolysis reaction. Such pH can
be obtained with substances commonly known as buffering agents, which are optional
components of the bleaching systems herein.
The Peroxygen Bleaching Compound
[0052] The peroxygen bleaching systems useful herein are those capable of yielding hydrogen
peroxide in an aqueous liquor. These compounds are well known in the art and include
hydrogen peroxide and the alkali metal peroxides, organic peroxide bleaching compounds
such as urea peroxide, and inorganic persalt bleaching compounds, such as the alkali
metal perborates, percarbonates, perphosphates, and the like. Mixtures of two or more
such bleaching compounds can also be used, if desired.
[0053] Preferred peroxygen bleaching compounds include sodium perborate, commercially available
in the form of mono-, tri-, and tetra-hydrate, sodium pyrophosphate peroxyhydrate,
urea peroxyhydrate, sodium percarbonate, and sodium peroxide. Particularly preferred
are sodium perborate tetrahydrate, sodium perborate monohydrate and sodium percarbonate.
Percarbonate is especially preferred because it is very stable during storage and
yet still dissolves very quickly in the bleaching liquor. It is believed that such
rapid dissolution results in the formation of higher levels of percarboxylic acid
and, thus, enhanced surface bleaching performance.
[0054] Highly preferred percarbonate can be in uncoated or coated form. The average particle
size of uncoated percarbonate ranges from 400 to 1200 microns, most preferably from
400 to 600 microns. If coated percarbonate is used, the preferred coating materials
include mixtures of carbonate and sulphate, silicate, borosilicate, or fatty carboxylic
acids.
[0055] The peroxygen bleaching compound will comprise at least 0.1%, preferably from 1%
to 75%, more preferably from 3% to 40%, most preferably from 3% to 25%, by weight
of bleaching system or detergent composition.
[0056] The weight ratio of bleach activator to peroxygen bleaching compound in the bleaching
system typically ranges from 2:1 to 1:5. Preferred ratios range from 1:1 to 1:3.
[0057] The bleach activator/bleaching compound systems herein are useful per se as bleaches.
However, such bleaching systems are especially useful compositions which can comprise
various detersive adjuncts such as surfactants and, builders.
The Detersive Enzymes
[0058] The detersive enzymes of the present invention are included for a wide variety of
fabric laundering purposes, including removal of protein-based, carbohydrate-based,
or triglyceride-based stains, for example, and for the prevention of fugitive dye
transfer. The enzymes to be incorporated include proteases, amylases, lipases, cellulases,
and peroxidases, as well as mixtures thereof. Other types of enzymes may also be included.
They may be of any suitable origin, such as vegetable, animal, bacterial, fungal and
yeast origin. However, their choice is governed by several factors such as pH-activity
and/or stability optima, thermostability, stability versus active detergents, builders
and so on. In this respect bacterial or fungal enzymes are preferred, such as bacterial
amylases and proteases, and fungal cellulases.
[0059] Enzymes are normally incorporated at levels sufficient to provide up to 50 mg by
weight, more typically 0.01 mg to 10 mg, of active enzyme per gram of detergent composition.
Stated otherwise, an effective amount of the enzymes employed in the present invention
will comprise at least 0.001%, preferably from 0.001% to 5%, more preferably from
0.001% to 1%, most preferably from 0.01% to 1%, by weight of detergent composition.
[0060] Suitable examples of proteases are the subtilisins which are obtained from particular
strains of B.subtilis, B.lentus and B.licheniforms. Another suitable protease is a
modified bacterial serine protease enzyme obtained from
Bacillus subtilis or
Bacillus licheniformis, having maximum activity throughout the pH range of 8-12, developed and sold by Novo
Industries A/S under the registered trade name ESPERASE. The preparation of this enzyme
and analogous enzymes is described in British Patent Specification No. 1,243,784 of
Novo. Proteolytic enzymes suitable for removing protein-based stains that are commercially
available include those sold under the tradenames ALCALASE and SAVINASE by Novo Industries
A/S (Denmark) and MAXATASE by International Bio-Synthetics, Inc. (The Netherlands).
Other proteases include Protease A (see European Patent Application 130,756, published
January 9, 1985) and Protease B (see European Patent Application Serial No. 87303761.8,
filed April 28, 1987, and European Patent Application 130,756, Bott et al, published
January 9, 1985). Most preferred is what is called herein "Protease C", which is a
variant of an alkaline serine protease from
Bacillus, particularly
Bacillus lentus, in which arginine replaced lysine at position 27, tyrosine replaced valine at position
104, serine replaced asparagine at position 123, and alanine replaced threonine at
position 274. Protease C is described in EP 90915958.4, U.S. Patent No. 5,185,250
and U.S. Patent No. 5,204,015. Genetically modified variants, particularly of Protease
C, are also included herein.
[0061] Amylases include, for example, a-amylases described in British Patent Specification
No. 1,296,839 (Novo), RAPIDASE, International Bio-Synthetics, Inc. and TERMAMYL, Novo
Industries.
[0062] The cellulases usable in the present invention include both bacterial or fungal cellulase.
Preferably, they will have a pH optimum of between 5 and 9.5. Suitable cellulases
are disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,435,307, Barbesgoard et al, issued March 6, 1984, which
discloses fungal cellulase produced from Humicola insolens and Humicola strain DSM1800
or a cellulase 212-producing fungus belonging to the genus Aeromonas, and cellulase
extracted from the hepatopancreas of a marine mollusk (Dolabella Auricula Solander).
Suitable cellulases are also disclosed in GB-A-2.075.028; GB-A-2.095.275 and DE-OS-2.247.832.
[0063] Suitable lipase enzymes for detergent usage include those produced by microorganisms
of the Pseudomonas group, such as Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 19.154, as disclosed in
British Patent 1,372,034. See also lipases in Japanese Patent Application 53-20487,
laid open to public inspection on February 24, 1978. This lipase is available from
Amano Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nagoya, Japan, under the trade name Lipase P "Amano,"
hereinafter referred to as "Amano-P." Other commercial lipases include Amano-CES,
lipases ex Chromobacter viscosum, e.g. Chromobacter viscosum var. lipolyticum NRRLB
3673, commercially available from Toyo Jozo Co., Tagata, Japan; and further Chromobacter
viscosum lipases from U.S. Biochemical Corp., U.S.A. and Disoynth Co., The Netherlands,
and lipases ex Pseudomonas gladioli. The LIPOLASE enzyme, derived from the fungus
Humicola lanuginosa and expressed in
Aspergillus oryzae as host and commercially available from Novo (see also E.P. Patent 341,947) is a
preferred lipase for use herein.
[0064] Peroxidase enzymes are used in combination with oxygen sources, e.g., percarbonate,
perborate, persulfate, hydrogen peroxide, etc. They are used for "solution bleaching,"
i.e. to prevent transfer of dyes or pigments removed from substrates during wash operations
to other substrates in the wash solution. Peroxidase enzymes are known in the art,
and include, for example, horseradish peroxidase, ligninase, and haloperoxidase such
as chloro- and bromo-peroxidase. Peroxidase-containing detergent compositions are
disclosed, for example, in PCT International Application WO 89/099813, published October
19, 1989, by O. Kirk, assigned to Novo Industries A/S.
[0065] A wide range of enzyme materials and means for their incorporation into synthetic
detergent granules is also disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,553,139, issued January 5, 1971
to McCarty et al. Enzymes are further disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,101,457, Place et
al, issued July 18, 1978, and in U.S. Patent 4,507,219, Hughes, issued March 26, 1985,
both. Enzyme materials useful for liquid detergent formulations, and their incorporation
into such formulations, are disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,261,868, Hora et al, issued
April 14, 1981. Enzymes for use in detergents can be stabilized by various techniques.
Enzyme stabilization techniques are disclosed and exemplified in U.S. Patent 4,261,868,
issued April 14, 1981 to Horn, et al, U.S. Patent 3,600,319, issued August 17, 1971
to Gedge, et al, and European Patent Application Publication No. 0199405, Application
No. 86200586.5, published October 29, 1986, Venegas. Enzyme stabilization systems
are also described, for example, in U.S. Patents 4,261,868, 3,600,319, and 3,519,570.
[0066] Enzyme Stabilizers - The enzymes employed herein are stabilized by the presence of water-soluble sources
of calcium ions in the finished compositions which provide calcium ions to the enzymes.
Additional stability can be provided by the presence of various other art-disclosed
stabilizers, especially borate species: see Severson, U.S. 4,537,706, cited above.
Typical detergents, especially liquids, will comprise from 1 to 30, preferably from
2 to 20, more preferably from 5 to 15, and most preferably from 8 to 12, millimoles
of calcium ion per liter of finished composition. This can vary somewhat, depending
on the amount of enzyme present and its response to the calcium ions. The level of
calcium ion should be selected so that there is always some minimum level available
for the enzyme, after allowing for complexation with builders, fatty acids, etc.,
in the composition. Any water-soluble calcium salt can be used as the source of calcium
ion, including, but not limited to, calcium chloride, calcium sulfate, calcium malate,
calcium hydroxide, calcium formate, and calcium acetate. A small amount of calcium
ion, generally from 0.05 to 0.4 millimoles per liter, is often also present in the
composition due to calcium in the enzyme slurry and formula water. In solid detergent
compositions the formulation may include a sufficient quantity of a water-soluble
calcium ion source to provide such amounts in the laundry liquor. In the alternative,
natural water hardness may suffice.
[0067] The compositions herein may also optionally, but preferably, contain various additional
stabilizers including silicate coatings and, especially borate-type stabilizers. Typically,
such stabilizers will be used at levels in the compositions from 0.25% to 10%, preferably
from 0.5% to 5%, more preferably from 0.75% to 3%, by weight of boric acid or other
borate compound capable of forming boric acid in the composition (calculated on the
basis of boric acid). Boric acid is preferred, although other compounds such as boric
oxide, borax and other alkali metal borates (e.g., sodium ortho-, meta- and pyroborate,
and sodium pentaborate) are suitable. Substituted boric acids (e.g., phenylboronic
acid, butane boronic acid, and p-bromo phenylboronic acid) can also be used in place
of boric acid.
Detersive Surfactant
[0068] The amount of detersive surfactant included in the fully-formulated detergent compositions
used according to the present invention can vary from 1% to 99.8% depending upon the
particular surfactants used and the effects desired. Preferably, the detersive surfactants
comprise from 5% to 80% by weight of the detergent ingredients.
[0069] The detersive surfactant can be nonionic, anionic, ampholytic, zwitterionic, or cationic.
Mixtures of these surfactants can also be used. Preferred detergent compositions comprise
anionic detersive surfactants or mixtures of anionic surfactants with other surfactants,
especially nonionic surfactants.
[0070] Nonlimiting examples of surfactants useful herein include the conventional C
11-C
18 alkyl benzene sulfonates and primary, secondary, and random alkyl sulfates, the C
10-C
18 alkyl alkoxy sulfates, the C
10-C
18 alkyl polyglycosides and their corresponding sulfated polyglycosides, C
12-C
18 alpha-sulfonated fatty acid esters, C
12-C
18 alkyl and alkyl phenol alkoxylates (especially ethoxylates and mixed ethoxy/propoxy),
C
12-C
18 betaines and sulfobetaines ("sultaines"), C
10-C
18 amine oxides, and the like. Other conventional useful surfactants are listed in standard
texts.
[0071] One particular class of adjunct nonionic surfactants especially useful herein comprises
the polyhydroxy fatty acid amides of the formula:

wherein: R
1 is H, C
1-C
8 hydrocarbyl, 2-hydroxyethyl, 2-hydroxypropyl, or a mixture thereof, preferably C
1-C
4 alkyl, more preferably C
1 or C
2 alkyl, most preferably C
1 alkyl (i.e., methyl); and R
2 is a C
5-C
32 hydrocarbyl moiety, preferably straight chain C
7-C
19 alkyl or alkenyl, more preferably straight chain C
9-C
17 alkyl or alkenyl, most preferably straight chain C
11-C
19 alkyl or alkenyl, or mixture thereof; and Z is a polyhydroxyhydrocarbyl moiety having
a linear hydrocarbyl chain with at least 2 (in the case of glyceraldehyde) or at least
3 hydroxyls (in the case of other reducing sugars) directly connected to the chain,
or an alkoxylated derivative (preferably ethoxylated or propoxylated) thereof. Z preferably
will be derived from a reducing sugar in a reductive amination reaction; more preferably
Z is a glycityl moiety. Suitable reducing sugars include glucose, fructose, maltose,
lactose, galactose, mannose, and xylose, as well as glyceraldehyde. As raw materials,
high dextrose corn syrup, high fructose corn syrup, and high maltose corn syrup can
be utilized as well as the individual sugars listed above. These corn syrups may yield
a mix of sugar components for Z. It should be understood that it is by no means intended
to exclude other suitable raw materials. Z preferably will be selected from the group
consisting of -CH
2-(CHOH)
n-CH
2OH,CH(CH
2OH)-(CHOH)
n-1- -CH
2OH,-CH
2--(CHOH)
2(CHOR')(CHOH)-CH
2,OH, where n is an integer from 1 to 5, inclusive, and R' is H or a cyclic mono- or
poly- saccharide, and alkoxylated derivatives thereof. Most preferred are glycityls
wherein n is 4, particularly -CH
2-(CHOH)
4CH
2OH.
[0072] In Formula (I), R
1 can be, for example, N-methyl, N-ethyl, N-propyl, Nisopropyl, N-butyl, N-isobutyl,
N-2-hydroxy ethyl, or N-2-hydroxy propyl. For highest sudsing, R
1 is preferably methyl or hydroxyalkyl. If lower sudsing is desired, R
1 is preferably C
2-C
8 alkyl, especially n-propyl, iso-propyl, n-butyl, iso-butyl, pentyl, hexyl and 2-ethyl
hexyl.
[0073] R
2-CO-N< can be, for example, cocamide, stearamide, oleamide, lauramide, myristamide,
capricamide, palmitamide, tallowamide, etc.
Detersive Builders
[0074] Optional detergent ingredients employed in the present invention contain inorganic
and/or organic detersive builders to assist in mineral hardness control. If used,
these builders comprise from 5% to 80% by weight of the detergent compositions.
[0075] Inorganic detersive builders include, but are not limited to, the alkali metal, ammonium
and alkanolammonium salts of polyphosphates (exemplified by the tripolyphosphates,
pyrophosphates, and glassy polymeric meta-phosphates), phosphonates, phytic acid,
silicates, carbonates (including bicarbonates and sesquicarbonates), sulphates, and
aluminosilicates. However, nonphosphate builders are required in some locales.
[0076] Examples of silicate builders are the alkali metal silicates, particularly those
having a SiO
2:Na
2O ratio in the range 1.6:1 to 3.2:1 and layered silicates, such as the layered sodium
silicates described in U.S. Patent 4,664,839, issued May 12, 1987 to H. P. Rieck,
available from Hoechst under the trademark "SKS"; SKS-6 is an especially preferred
layered silicate builder.
[0077] Carbonate builders, especially a finely ground calcium carbonate with surface area
greater than 10 m
2/g, are preferred builders that can be used in granular compositions. The density
of such alkali metal carbonate built detergents can be in the range of 450-850 g/l
with the moisture content preferably below 4%.
[0078] Examples of carbonate builders are the alkaline earth and alkali metal carbonates
as disclosed in German Patent Application No. 2,321,001 published on November 15,
1973.
[0079] Aluminosilicate builders are especially useful in the present invention. Preferred
aluminosilicates are zeolite builders which have the formula:
Na
z[(AlO
2)
z (SiO
2)
y]
.xH
2O
wherein z and y are integers of at least 6, the molar ratio of z to y is in the range
from 1.0 to 0.5, and x is an integer from 15 to 264.
[0080] Useful aluminosilicate ion exchange materials are commercially available. These aluminosilicates
can be crystalline or amorphous in structure and can be naturally-occurring aluminosilicates
or synthetically derived. Methods for producing aluminosilicate ion exchange materials
are disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,985,669, Krummel, et al, issued October 12, 1976, and
U.S. Patent 4,605,509, Corkill, et al, issued Aug. 12, 1986. Preferred synthetic crystalline
aluminosilicate ion exchange materials useful herein are available under the designations
Zeolite A, Zeolite P (B) (including those disclosed in EPO 384,070), and Zeolite X.
Preferably, the aluminosilicate has a particle size of about 0.1-10 microns in diameter.
[0081] Organic detersive builders suitable for the purposes of the present invention include,
but are not restricted to, a wide variety of polycarboxylate compounds, such as ether
polycarboxylates, including oxydisuccinate, as disclosed in Berg, U.S. Patent 3,128,287,
issued April 7, 1964, and Lamberti et al, U.S. Patent 3,635,830, issued January 18,
1972. See also "TMS/TDS" builders of U.S. Patent 4,663,071, issued to Bush et al,
on May 5, 1987. Suitable ether polycarboxylates also include cyclic compounds, particularly
alicyclic compounds, such as those described in U.S. Patents 3,923,679; 3,835,163;
4,158,635; 4,120,874 and 4,102,903.
[0082] Other useful detersive builders include the ether hydroxy-polycarboxylates, copolymers
of maleic anhydride with ethylene or vinyl methyl ether, 1, 3, 5trihydroxy benzene-2,
4, 6-trisulphonic acid, and carboxymethyl-oxysuccinic acid, the various alkali metal,
ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of polyacetic acids such as ethylenediamine
tetraacetic acid and nitrilotriacetic acid, as well as polycarboxylates such as mellitic
acid, succinic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, polymaleic acid, benzene 1,3,5-tricarboxylic
acid, carboxymethyloxysuccinic acid, and soluble salts thereof.
[0083] Citrate builders, e.g., citric acid and soluble salts thereof (particularly sodium
salt), are preferred polycarboxylate builders that can also be used in granular compositions,
especially in combination with zeolite and/or layered silicate builders.
[0084] Also suitable in the detergent compositions of the present invention are the 3,3-dicarboxy-4-oxa-1,6-hexanedioates
and the related compounds disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,566,984, Bush, issued January
28, 1986.
[0085] In situations where phosphorus-based builders can be used, and especially in the
formulation of bars used for hand-laundering operations, the various alkali metal
phosphates such as the well-known sodium tripolyphosphates, sodium pyrophosphate and
sodium orthophosphate can be used. Phosphonate builders such as ethane-1hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonate
and other known phosphonates (see, for example, U.S. Patents 3,159,581; 3,213,030;
3,422,021; 3,400,148 and 3,422,137) can also be used.
Optional Detersive Adjuncts
[0086] As a preferred embodiment, the conventional detergent ingredients employed herein
can be selected from typical detergent composition components such as detersive surfactants
and detersive builders. Optionally, the detergent ingredients can include one or more
other detersive adjuncts or other materials for assisting or enhancing cleaning performance,
treatment of the substrate to be cleaned, or to modify the aesthetics of the detergent
composition. Usual detersive adjuncts of detergent compositions include the ingredients
set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 3,936,537, Baskerville et al, are incorporated herein by
reference. Such adjuncts which can be included in detergent compositions employed
in the present invention, in their conventional art-established levels for use (generally
from 0% to 20% of the detergent ingredients, preferably from 0.5% to 10%), include
color speckles, suds boosters, suds suppressors, antitarnish and/or anticorrosion
agents, soil-suspending agents, soil release agents, dyes, fillers, optical brighteners,
germicides, alkalinity sources, hydrotropes, antioxidants, perfumes, solvents, solubilizing
agents, clay soil removal/anti-redeposition agents, polymeric dispersing agents, processing
aids, fabric softening components and static control agents.
[0087] Bleach systems optionally, but preferably, will also comprise a chelant which not
only enhances bleach stability by scavenging heavy metal ions which tend to decompose
bleaches, but also assists in the removal of polyphenolic stains such as tea stains,
and the like. Various chelants, including the aminophosphonates, available as DEQUEST
from Monsanto, the nitrilotriacetates, the hydroxyethyl-ethylenediamine triacetates,
and the like, are known for such use. Preferred biodegradable, non-phosphorus chelants
include ethylene-diamine disuccinate ("EDDS"; see U.S. Patent 4,704,233, Hartman and
Perkins), ethylenediamine-N,N'-diglutamate (EDDG) and 2-hydroxypropylenediamine-N,N'-disuccinate
(HPDDS) compounds. Such chelants can be used in their alkali or alkaline earth metal
salts, typically at levels from 0.1% to 10% of the present compositions.
[0088] Optionally, the detergent compositions employed herein can comprise, in addition
to the bleaching system of the present invention, one or more other conventional bleaching
agents, activators, or stabilizers which do not react with or otherwise harm natural
rubber. In general, the formulator will ensure that the bleach compounds used are
compatible with the detergent formulation. Conventional tests, such as tests of bleach
activity on storage in the presence of the separate or fully-formulated ingredients,
can be used for this purpose. A specific example of an optional bleaching agent for
incorporation in this invention is tetraacetyl ethylene diamine (TAED) Such bleaching
compounds and agents can be optionally included in detergent compositions in their
conventional art-established levels of use, generally from 0% to 15%, by weight of
detergent composition.
[0089] Bleaching activators of the invention are especially useful in conventional laundry
detergent compositions such as those typically found in granular detergents or laundry
bars. U.S. Patent 3,178,370, Okenfuss, issued April 13, 1965, describes laundry detergent
bars and processes for making them. Philippine Patent 13,778, Anderson, issued Sept.
23, 1980, describes synthetic detergent laundry bars. Methods for making laundry detergent
bars by various extrusion methods are well known in the art.
[0090] The following examples are given to further illustrate the present invention, but
are not intended to be limiting thereof.
EXAMPLE I
[0091] Synthesis of Nonanoyl Caprolactam - To a two litre three necked round bottomed flask
equipped with a condenser, overhead stirrer and 250ml addition funnel is charged 56.6g
(0.5 moles) caprolactam, 55.7g (0.55 moles) triethylamine and 1 litre of dioxane;
the resulting solution is heated to reflux (120°C). A solution of 88.4g (0.5 moles)
nonanoyl chloride dissolved in 200ml of dioxane is then added over 30 minutes and
the mixture is refluxed for a further 6 hours. The reaction mixture is then cooled,
filtered, and the solvent removed by rotary evaporation to yield 120.5g of the product
as a dark oil. This crude product is then dissolved in diethyl ether, washed with
3x50ml aliquots of water, dried over magnesium sulphate and the solvent removed by
rotary evaporation to yield 81.84g (65% theoretical yield) of product which is shown
by NMR to be 90% pure, with the remaining material being nonanoic acid.
EXAMPLE II
[0092] Synthesis of Benzoyl Caprolactam - To a two litre three necked round bottomed flask
equipped with a condenser, overhead stirrer and 250ml addition funnel is charged 68.2g
(0.6 moles) caprolactam, 70g (0.7 moles) triethylamine and 1 litre of dioxane; the
resulting solution is heated to reflux (120°C). A solution of 84.4g (0.6 moles) benzoyl
chloride dissolved in 200ml of dioxane is then added over 30 minutes and the mixture
is refluxed for a further 6 hours. The reaction mixture is then cooled, filtered,
and the solvent removed by rotary evaporation to yield 121.7g of the product as an
oil which crystallizes on standing. This crude product is then redissolved in toluene
and precipitated with hexane, yielding 103g (79% theoretical yield) of a white solid
which which is shown by NMR to be over 95% pure, with the remaining material being
benzoic acid.
EXAMPLE III
Synthesis of (6-nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate (NACA-OBS).
[0093] 6-nonanamidocaproic Acid (NACA) - The reaction is carried out in a 12L 3-necked flask equipped with a thermometer,
addition funnel and mechanical stirrer. To a solution made from 212g (5.3 moles) of
sodium hydroxide and 6L of water (cooled to room temperature) is added 694.3g (5.3
moles) of 6-aminocaproic acid. This mixture is cooled to 10°C and a solution of 694.3g
(5.3 moles) of nonanoyl chloride in 1L of ether is added in a slow stream (about 2.5
hours) keeping the temperature at 10-15°C. During the addition, and subsequently until
acidification, the reaction is maintained at pH 11-12 by periodic addition of 50%
NaOH. After the addition is complete, the reaction is stirred for another 2 hours
at 10°C and allowed to come to room temperature before acidification to pH 1 with
conc. HCI. The precipitated product is vacuum filtered, the filter cake is washed
twice with 8L portions of water and the product air dried overnight. It is then suspended
in 3L of hexane, filtered and washed with an additional 3L of hexane. The product
is then vacuum dried overnight (50°C, 1 mm) to give 1354 g (94%) of NACA.
[0094] Acid Chloride (NACA-Cl) - The reaction is carried out in a 5L, 3-necked flask equipped with an addition
funnel, mechanical stirrer and argon sweep. To a suspension of 542g (2.0 moles) of
NACA in 2L of toluene is added (in a slow stream over 30 minutes) 476g (4.0 moles)
of thionyl chloride. This mixture is stirred at room temperature for four hours during
which time the solids dissolve. The solution is partially evaporated (30°C, 10 mm)
to remove any excess thionyl chloride leaving 905g of NACA-Cl/toluene solution (contains
approximately 2 moles of NACA-Cl). An IR spectrum confirms conversion of COOH to COCI.
[0095] (6-nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate (NACA-OBS) - The reactor is a 12L, 3-necked flask equipped with a condenser, mechanical stirrer
and static argon supply. To the reactor are added 647g of the above NACA-Cl/toluene
solution (1.43 moles), 6L of toluene and 310.8g (1.43 moles) of disodium p-phenolsulfonate
(disodium p-phenolsulfonate is previously prepared and dried in a vacuum oven before
use (110°C, 0.1mm hg, 18 hours). This mixture is refluxed for 18 hours. After cooling
to room temperature, the product is collected on a Buchner funnel and dried to give
725g of crude solids. The crude is taken up in 7L of refluxing 87;13 (v,v) methanol/water,
filtered hot and allowed to recrystallize at room temperature. The resulting precipitate
is filtered and vacuum dried (50°C, 0.1 mm) for 18 hours to give 410g (64% based on
NACA) of light tan product. A trace of unreacted phenolsulfonate is indicated by the
small doublets at 6.75 and 7.55 ppm in the
1H spectrum. Otherwise, the spectra are consistent with expected structure and no other
impurities are evident.
EXAMPLE IV
[0096] A granular detergent composition is prepared comprising the following ingredients.
| Component |
Weight % |
| C12 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate |
22 |
| Phosphate (as sodium tripolyphosphate) |
30 |
| Sodium carbonate |
14 |
| Sodium silicate |
3 |
| Lipase |
0.3 |
| Sodium percarbonate |
5 |
| Ethylenediamine disuccinate chelant (EDDS) |
0.4 |
| Sodium sulfate |
5.5 |
| Nonanoyl caprolactam |
5 |
| Filler* and water |
Balance to 100% |
| *Can be selected from convenient materials such as CaCO3, talc, clay, silicates, and the like. |
[0097] In testing the bleaching performance and effect on natural rubber washing machine
parts, the following test method is used:
[0098] Aqueous crutcher mixes of heat and alkali stable components of the detergent compositions
are prepared and spray-dried and the other ingredients are admixed so that they contain
the ingredients tabulated at the levels shown.
[0099] The detergent granules with bleach activator are added together with 5 lb. (2.3 kg)
of previously laundered fabrics including natural rubber articles such as elastic
materials, to an automatic washing machine equipped with a natural rubber sump hose.
Actual weights of detergent and bleach activator are taken to provide a 950 ppm concentration
of the former and 50 ppm concentration of the latter in the 17 gallon (65 l) water-fill
machine. The water used has 119,8 mg/liter (7 grains/gallon) hardness and a pH of
7 to 7.5 prior to (about 9 to about 10.5 after) addition of the detergent and bleaching
system.
[0100] The fabrics are laundered at 35°C (95°F) for a full cycle (12 min.) and rinsed at
21°C (70°F). The laundering method is repeated for 2,000 wash cycles without rupture
of, or significant damage to, the natural rubber parts or without damage to the natural
rubber contained in the fabrics and with good enzyme performance.
EXAMPLE V
[0101] A granular detergent composition is prepared comprising the following ingredients.
| Component |
Weight % |
| Anionic alkyl sulfate |
7 |
| Nonionic surfactant |
5 |
| Zeolite (0.1-10 micron) |
10 |
| Trisodium citrate |
2 |
| SKS-6 silicate builder |
10 |
| Acrylate maleate polymer |
4 |
| Nonanoyl caprolactam |
5 |
| Sodium percarbonate* |
15 |
| Sodium carbonate |
5 |
| Ethylenediamine disuccinate chelant (EDDS) |
0.4 |
| Suds suppressor |
2 |
| Protease (as SAVINASE) |
0.3 |
| Lipase (as LIPOLASE) |
0.3 |
| Soil release agent |
0.2 |
| Minors, filler** and water |
Balance to 100% |
| *Average particle size of 400 to 1200 microns. |
| **Can be selected from convenient materials such as CaCO3, talc, clay, silicates, and the like. |
[0102] In testing the bleaching performance and effect on natural rubber washing machine
parts, the following test method is used:
[0103] Aqueous crutcher mixes of heat and alkali stable components of the detergent composition
are prepared and spray-dried, and the other ingredients are admixed so that they contain
the ingredients tabulated at the levels shown.
[0104] The detergent granules with bleach activator are added via the dispensing drawer
together with 5 lb. (2.3 kg) of previously laundered fabrics to an automatic washing
machine equipped with a natural rubber sump hose. Actual weights of detergent and
bleach activator are taken to provide a 8,000 ppm concentration of the former and
400 ppm concentration of the latter in the 17 1 water-fill machine. The water used
has 10 grains/gallon hardness and a pH of 7 to 7.5 prior to (about 9 to about 10.5
after) addition of the detergent and bleaching system.
[0105] The fabrics are laundered at 40°C (104°F) for a full cycle (40 min.) and rinsed at
21°C (70°F). The laundering method is repeated for 2,000 wash cycles without rupture
of, or significant damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability
and performance.
EXAMPLE VI
[0106] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example V,
with the single exception that an equivalent amount of benzoyloxybenzene sulfonate
is substituted for the nonanoyl caprolactam. The laundering method of Example V is
repeated for about 1200 cycles at which time the natural rubber parts ruptures.
EXAMPLE VII
[0107] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example V,
with the single exception that an equivalent amount of (6-nonanamidocaproyl)-oxybenzenesulfonate
as prepared in Example III is substituted for the nonanoyl caprolactam. The laundering
method of Example V is repeated for 2000 cycles without rupture of, or significant
damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE VIII
[0108] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example V,
with the exceptions that 15% of a 1:1:1 mixture of benzoyl caprolactam, nonanoyl caprolactam
and (6-nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzene-sulfonate as prepared following Example III is
substituted for the nonanoyl caprolactam and the amount of sodium percarbonate is
30%. The laundering method of Example V is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture
of, or significant damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability
and performance.
EXAMPLE IX
[0109] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example IV,
with the exceptions that 20% of a 1:1 mixture of benzoyl caprolactam and (6-nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate
as prepared following Example III is substituted for the nonanoyl caprolactam, the
amount of sodium percarbonate is 20%, and the amount of phosphate is 0%. The laundering
method of Example IV is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant
damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE X
[0110] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example V,
with the single exception that an equivalent amount of a benzoxazin-type activator
is substituted for the nonanoyl caprolactam. The laundering method of Example V is
repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant damage to, the natural
rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XI
[0111] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example V,
with the exceptions that 10% of a 1:1 mixture of a benzoxazin-type activator and tetraacetyl
ethylene diamine is substituted for the nonanoyl caprolactam and the amount of sodium
percarbonate is 25%. The laundering method of Example V is repeated for 2,000 cycles
without rupture of, or significant damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good
enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XII
[0112] A laundry bar suitable for hand-washing soiled fabrics is prepared by standard extrusion
processes and comprises the following:
| Component |
Weight % |
| C12 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate |
30 |
| Phosphate (as sodium tripolyphosphate) |
7 |
| Sodium carbonate |
25 |
| Sodium pyrophosphate |
7 |
| Coconut monoethanolamide |
2 |
| Zeolite A (0.1-10 micron) |
5 |
| Carboxymethylcellulose |
0.2 |
| Polyacrylate (m.w. 1400) |
0.2 |
| (6-nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate |
5 |
| Sodium percarbonate |
5 |
| Brightener, perfume |
0.2 |
| Protease (as Protease C) |
0.3 |
| Lipase (as LIPOLASE) |
0.3 |
| CaSO4 |
1 |
| MgSO4 |
1 |
| Water |
4 |
| Filler* |
Balance to 100% |
| *Can be selected from convenient materials such as CaCO3, talc, clay, silicates, and the like. |
[0113] The detergent laundry bars are processed in conventional soap or detergent bar making
equipment as commonly used in the art. Testing is conducted following the procedures
and methods in Example V. The laundering method, is repeated for 2,000 wash cycles
without rupture of, or significant damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good
enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XIII
[0114] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example XII,
with the single exception that an equivalent amount of benzoyl caprolactam is substituted
for the (6-nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate. The laundering method of Example
XII is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant damage to, the
natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XIV
[0115] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example XII,
with the single exception that an equivalent amount of nonanoyl caprolactam is substituted
for the (6-nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate. The laundering method of Example
XII is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant damage to, the
natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XV
[0116] A granular detergent composition is prepared comprising the following ingredients.
| Component |
Weight % |
| Anionic alkyl sulfate |
7 |
| Nonionic surfactant |
5 |
| Zeolite (0.1-10 micron) |
10 |
| Trisodium citrate |
2 |
| SKS-6 silicate builder |
10 |
| Acrylate maleate polymer |
4 |
| Nonanoyl caprolactam |
5 |
| Sodium percarbonate* |
15 |
| Sodium carbonate |
5 |
| Ethylenediamine disuccinate chelant (EDDS) |
0.4 |
| Suds suppressor |
2 |
| Protease (as Protease C) |
0.5 |
| Soil release agent |
0.2 |
| Minors, filler** and water |
Balance to 100% |
| *Average particle size of 400 to 1200 microns. |
| **Can be selected from convenient materials such as CaCO3, talc, clay, silicates, and the like |
[0117] Aqueous crutcher mixes of heat and alkali stable components of the detergent composition
are prepared and spray-dried, and the other ingredients are admixed so that they contain
the ingredients tabulated at the levels shown.
[0118] Testing is conducted following the procedures and methods in Example V. The laundering
method of Example V is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant
damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XVI
[0119] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example XV,
with the single exception that an equivalent amount of benzoyl caprolactam is substituted
for the nonanoyl caprolactam.
[0120] Testing is conducted following the procedures and methods in Example V. The laundering
method of Example V is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant
damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XVII
[0121] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example XV,
with the exceptions that 15%, by weight, of (6-nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate
is substituted for the nonanoyl caprolactam and the amount of sodium percarbonate
is 30%.
[0122] Testing is conducted following the procedures and methods in Example V. The laundering
method of Example V is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant
damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XVIII
[0123] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example XV,
with the exceptions that 15%, by weight, of a 1:1 mixture of (6nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate
and (6-decanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate activator is substituted for the nonanoyl
caprolactam and the amount of sodium percarbonate is 30%.
[0124] Testing is conducted following the procedures and methods in Example V. The laundering
method of Example V is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant
damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XIX
[0125] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example XV,
with the exceptions that 15%, by weight, of a 1:1 mixture of (6octanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate
and (6-decanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate activator is substituted for the nonanoyl
caprolactam and the amount of sodium percarbonate is 30%.
[0126] Testing is conducted following the procedures and methods in Example V. The laundering
method of Example V is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant
damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XX
[0127] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example XV,
with the exceptions that 15%, by weight, of (6-octanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate
is substituted for the nonanoyl caprolactam and the amount of sodium percarbonate
is 30%.
[0128] Testing is conducted following the procedures and methods in Example V. The laundering
method of Example V is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant
damage to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
EXAMPLE XXI
[0129] A detergent composition is prepared by a procedure identical to that of Example XV,
with the exceptions that 15%, by weight, of (6-decanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate
activator is substituted for the nonanoyl caprolactam and the amount of sodium percarbonate
is 30%.
[0130] Testing is conducted following the procedures and methods in Example V. The laundering
method of Example V is repeated for 2,000 cycles without rupture of, or significant
to, the natural rubber parts and with good enzyme stability and performance.
Method of Processing the Bleach Activators
[0131] The bleach activators may be processed with a range of organic and inorganic substances
to achieve a rapid dispersion in the bleaching liquor and to insure good stability
in the detergent composition. The bleach activators are preferably employed in particulate
form.
[0132] An example of preferred caprolactam bleach activator particles is an agglomerate
of 65%, by weight, benzoyl caprolactam; 7% of a builder, such as aluminium silicate;
15% sodium carbonate; 9% dispersant, such as a polyacrylate polymer; and 4% of a solubilizing
agent, such as a linear alkyl sulfonate. Another example of a preferred caprolactam
bleach activator particle is an agglomerate of 80% to 85%, by weight, benzoyl caprolactam
and 15% to 20% of a binder, such as tallow alcohol ethoxylate, preferably TAE25.
[0133] An example of a preferred amido-derived bleach activator particle comprises a 1:1:1
mixture of (6-octanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate, (6decanamidocaproyl)-oxybenzenesulfonate,
and citric acid powder. The mixture is intimately mixed in a food mixer for 5-10 minutes.
To the resultant mixture is added tallow alcohol ethoxylate (TAE25) nonionic surfactant
at 50° C until granules are formed. Typically successful granulations are achieved
with a ratio of bleach activator/citric acid solid mixtures:nonionic binding agent
of 3.5:1. The resultant granules, ellipsodial and spherical in shape, are white and
free flowing.
[0134] A typical particle composition is 40% to 60%, preferably 55%, by weight, of the bleach
activator or mixture of bleach activators; 20% to 40%, preferably 25%, by weight,
of citric acid; and 15% to about 30%, preferably 20%, by weight, TAE25 binding agent.
Alternatively, a 2:1 mixture of (6-decanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate and citric
acid powder may be used. In this case, the composition on the granule is 55% bleach
activator, 25% citric acid, and 20% TAE25 binding agent. Other preferred organic binding
agents include anionic surfactants (C
12 linear alkyl benzene sulfonates), polyethylene glycols, and TAE50.
[0135] Another example of a preferred amido-derived bleach activator particle comprises
a 1:1:1 mixture of (6-octanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate, (6-decanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate,
and sodium hydrogen sulfate. To the mixture is added 20% by weight of an anionic surfactant
(alkyl sulfate is particularly perferred). The components are mixed into a paste with
water, typically 30-50% by weight of water being added, and introduced into an air
flow such that droplets are formed. This techinque is commonly known as spray drying.
This may be achieved using, for example a Nyro atomiser, or a spray gun. Hot air (typically
150-300 degree Celisius) is blasted upwards through a column. The resulting particles
formed are collected at the bottom of the column and classified into desired size.
[0136] A typical particle composition is 40-60%, preferably 55%, by weight of the bleach
activator or mixture of activators, 20-40%, preferably 25%, of sodium hydrogen sulfate,
and 15-25%, preferably about 20%, of anionic surfactant. Alternatively, a 2:1 mixture
of (6decanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate and sodium hydrogen sulfate may be used.
Citric acid or boric acid may also be used in place of sodium hydrogen sulfate in
the above examples.
[0137] The particle size of the resulting granules may be varied according to the desired
performance/stability. Fine particles (<250 um) show improved solubility; though coarse
particles (>1180 um) are more stable in high temperatures/moist environments. A typical,
preferred particle size range is 250-1180 um; particles conforming to this specification
show excellent stability and solubility.