TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention is concerned with high-performance particulate laundry detergent
compositions of high bulk density.
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ART
[0002] EP 544 492A (Unilever), published on 2 June 1993, discloses and claims particulate
detergent compositions having a bulk density of at least 650 g/l, preferably at least
700 g/l and advantageously at least 800 g/l. The compositions contain 20-60 wt% of
zeolite builder and 15-50 wt% of a high-performanco surfactant system rich in nonionic
surfactant: 60-100 wt% of ethoxylated nonionic surfactant having a relatively low
average degree of ethoxylation (≤6.5EO), and optionally 0-40 wt% of primary alcohol
sulphate. It will be seen that the ratio of primary alcohol, sulphate to nonionic
surfactant cannot exceed 0.67:1.
[0003] The zeolite builder is preferably zeolite P having a silicon to aluminium ratio not
exceeding 1.33 (zeolite MAP) as described and claimed in EP 384 070A (Unilever). This
material has exceptionally good carrying capacity for liquid detergent ingredients,
as described and claimed in EP 521 635A (Unilever). When used at relatively high levels
the zeolite MAP enables high concentrations of the mobile surfactant system to be
carried without loss of powder flow properties, and the zeolite also acts as a highly
efficient builder, with a greater calcium binding capacity than that of conventional
zeolite 4A.
[0004] However, the relatively high levels of the insoluble zeolite A24 may, under certain
wash conditions, lead to deposition of insoluble residues on the wash load; but reduction
of the zeolite level would reduce both liquid carrying capacity and building capacity,
causing a deterioration in detergency as well as in powder properties.
[0005] It has now been found that the residue problem can be reduced or oliminated surprisingly
without resulting in a significant loss of detergency performance or deterioration
in powder properties, by using a surfactant system containing less nonionic surfactant
and more primary alcohol sulphate.
[0006] It has been found that the level of zeolite can then be lowered, thus further reducing
the incidence of residues. Any loss of building capacity resulting in the use of a
lower level of zeolite may be made good by the inclusion of a soluble organic builder
such as sodium citrate.
[0007] It has also been found that, in these formulations, the average degree of ethorylation
of the nonionic surfactant need not be 6.5 or less, as specified in EP 544 492A (Unilever)
referred to above, but may be as high as 8 without significant loss of detergency.
[0008] The compositions of EP 544 492A (Unilever) are intended primarily for use in automatic
washing machines, especially the front-loading drum-type washing machines used in
Europe.
[0009] Compositions of the present invention having a higher ratio of anionic surfactant
to nonionic surfactant, and thus a higher potential for foaming in the absence of
a foam controller, are also useful for washing fabrics by hand. These compositions
have been found to have advantageous foam profiles when compared with conventional
handwash formulations.
[0010] JP 02 049 099A (Asahi Denko) discloses particulate fabric washing detergent compositions
of high bulk density containing alkyl sulphate (25-45 wt%), ethoxylated alcohol nonionic
surfactant (1-10 wt%), soap and zeolite. In the compositions disclosed, the amount
of noniontc surfactant is low, and the ratio of alkyl sulphate to nonionic surfactant
high (typically from 5:1 to 12:1), but a comparative Example, said to be disadvantageous
because of poor anticaking and rinsing properties, contains alkyl sulphate and nonionic
surfactant in a ratio of 2.08:1.
[0011] WO-A-94 13771, published on 23 June 1994, discloses a granulated washing and cleaning
agent with high surfactant content in which the ratio of anionic alkyl sulphate surfactant
to nonionic surfactant is in the range 10:1 to 1: 2.5. The builder may comprise zeolite
but zeolite MAP is not mentioned.
DEFINITION OF THE INVENTION
[0012] The present invention accordingly provides a particulate detergent composition having
a bulk density of at least 700 g/l, comprising:
(a) from 15 to 35 wt% of a surfactant system consisting essentially of:
(i) primary C8-C18 alkyl sulphate, and
(ii) ethoxylated nonionic surfactant which is a primary C8-C18 alcohol having an average degree of ethoxylation within the range of from 3 to 8,
the ratio of (i) to (ii) being within the range of from 0.68:1 to 2:1;
(b) from 10 to 35 wt% (anhydrous basis) of zeolite P having a silicon to aluminium
ratio not exceeding 1.33 (zeolite MAP);
(c) optionally from 0 to 30 wt% of a water-soluble organic builder,
(d) optionally other detergent ingredients to 100 wt%.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0013] The particulate detergent composition of the invention has a bulk density of at least
700 g/l.
[0014] It contains a relatively high level of surfactant: from 15 to 35 wt%, and advantageously
at least 20 wt%. In formulations intended for use in machine washing, the surfactant
level is preferably from 15 to 30 wt%, while for handwashing formulations the surfactant
level is preferably from 25 to 35 wt%.
[0015] The surfactant system consists essentially of primary alcohol sulphate (PAS) and
ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactant, in a ratio of from 0.68:1 to 2:1. Preferably
the ratio ranges from 1:1 to 2:1.
[0016] The surfactant system thus consists essentially of more than 40 wt% of PAS and less
than 60 wt% of nonionic surfactant, preferably from 40.5 to 66.7 wt% of PAS and from
33.3 to 59.5 wt% of ethoxylated nonionic surfactant.
The ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactant
[0017] The nonionic surfactant has an average degree of ethoxylation within the range of
from 3 to 8. A mixture of two or more nonionic surfactants may be used, provided that
the aggregate average degree of ethoxylation is within the stated range.
[0018] In order to achieve the best possible detergency, the nonionic surfactant may, as
in EP 544 492A (Unilever) mentioned above, have an average degree of ethoxylation
not exceeding 6.5, especially from 4 to 6, and more especially from 4 to 5.5.
[0019] However, it has been found that in the compositions of the present invention, where
the ratio of PAS to nonionic surfactant is higher, the average degree of ethoxylation
of the nonionic surfactant may be higher without significant loss of detergency. Thus
the present invention allows greater formulation flexibility using a wider range of
nonionic surfactants.
[0020] Thus, the nonionic surfactant may if desired have an average degree of ethoxylation
anywhere within the range of from 3 to 8, advantageously from 5 to 8. Nonionic surfactant
systems having overall average degrees of ethoxylation within the range of from 6
to 8, preferably from 6.5 to 8, have been found to give good results in compositions
of the invention.
[0021] For optimum detergency, the nonionic surfactant may advantageously have a hydrophilic/lipophilic
balance (HLB) of 10.0 or more.
[0022] The ethoxylated alcohol is preferably primary, but in principle secondary alcohol
ethoxylates could be used.
[0023] The alcohol may be straight-chain or branched-chain. Suitable alcohols are vegetable-derived,
for example, coconut. Both Ziegler and oxo synthetic alcohols may be used, Ziegler
alcohols being preferred.
[0024] The amount of nonionic surfactant present in the compositions of the invention is
preferably within the range of from 6 to 12 wt%.
The primary alcohol sulphate (PAS)
[0025] The primary alcohol sulphate (PAS) that is present in the compositions of the invention
may have a chain length in the range of C
8 to C
18, preferably C
12 to C
16, with a mean value preferably in the C
12-15 range. Especially preferred is PAS consisting wholly or predominantly of C
12 and C
14 material.
[0026] However, if desired mixtures of different chain lengths may be used as described
and claimed in EP 342 917A (Unilever).
[0027] As for the ethoxylated alcohol, the PAS may be straight-chain or branched-chain.
Vegetable-derived PAS, especially PAS from coconut oil (cocoPAS), is especially preferred.
Use of branched-chain PAS as described and claimed in EP 439 316A (Unilever) is also
within the scope of the invention.
[0028] The PAS is normally present in the form of the sodium or potassium salt, the sodium
salt being generally preferred.
[0029] The amount of PAS present in the compositions of the present invention is preferably
within the range of from 10 to 30 wt%.
The zeolite detergency builder
[0030] The amount of zeolite builder in the compositions of the invention is from 10 to
35 wt%. These percentages are based on the (notional) anhydrous material, rather than
the hydrated material actually used.
[0031] As mentioned above, the use of higher ratios of PAS to nonionic surfactant than in
EP 544 492A (Unilever) enables lower levels of zeolite to be employed without loss
of performance. Thus formulations intended for machine washing will contain from 10
to 35 wt%, the range of 15 to 30 wt% being especially preferred. However, compositions
having higher levels of zeolite (up to and including 35 wt%) are also within the scope
of the invention, and are of especial interest for handwashing formulations.
[0032] The total surfactant loading and/or the proportion of nonionic surfactant is or are
increased, the more difficult it is to obtain acceptable powder flow properties. According
to the invention, the zeolite builder incorporated in the compositions of the invention
is zeolite MAP as described and claimed in EP 384 070A (Unilever).
[0033] Zeolite MAP is defined as an alkali metal aluminosilleate of the zeolite P type having
a silicon to aluminium ratio not exceeding 1.33, preferably not exceeding 1.15, and
more preferably not exceeding 1.07. The calcium binding capacity of zeolite MAP is
generally at least 150 mg CaO/g (anhydrous).
[0034] In the present invention, the use of zeolite MAP has two advantages quite independent
of its greater building efficacy: it enables higher total surfactant levels, and more
mobile surfactant systems, to be used without loss of powder flow properties; and
it gives improved bleach stability.
[0035] Preferred zeolite MAP for use in the present invention is especially finely divided
and has a d
50 (as defined below) within the range of from 0.1 to 5.0 µm, more preferably from 0.4
to 2.0 µm and most preferably from 0.4 to 1.0 µm. The quantity "d
50" indicates that 50 wt% of the particles have a diameter smaller than that figure,
and there are corresponding quantities "d
60", "d
90" etc. Especially preferred materials have a d
90 below 3 µm as well as a d
50 below 1 µm.
The optional soluble organic builder
[0036] The compositions of the invention may advantageously comprise up to 30 wt%, suitably
from 5 to 30 wt% and preferably from 10 to 25 wt%, of a soluble organic builder.
[0037] Organic builders that may be present include polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates,
acrylic/maleic copolymers, and acrylic phosphinates; monomeric polycarboxylates such
as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono-, di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates,
carboxymethyloxymalonates, dipicolinates, hydroxyethyliminodiacetates, alkyl- and
alkenylmalonates and succinates; and sulphonated fatty acid salts. This list is not
intended to be exhaustive.
[0038] Especially preferred supplementary builders for use in conjunction with zeolite include
citric acid salts, more especially sodium citrate, suitably used in amounts of from
5 to 30 wt%, preferably from 10 to 25 wt%. The combination of zeolite MAP with citrate
as a detergency builder system is described and claimed in EP 448 297A (Unilever).
[0039] Also preferred are polycarboxylate polymers, more especially acrylic/maleic copolymers,
suitably used in amounts of from 0.5 to 15.wt%, especially from 1 to 10 wt%, of the
detergent composition; the combination of zeolite MAP with polymeric builders is described
and claimed in EP 502 675A (Unilever).
[0040] The use of supplementary organic builders allows formulation with a lower level of
zeolite, thus reducing the level of insoluble material present, without loss of calcium
binding capacity.
[0041] Builders are preferably present in alkali metal salt, especially sodium salt, form.
Bleach system
[0042] Compositions of the invention that are intended for heavy duty use will generally
contain a bleach system.
[0043] The bleach system preferably comprises an inorganic or organic peroxy bleach compound
capable of yielding hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution. Peroxy bleach compounds
suitable for use in the compositions of the invention include organic peroxides such
as urea peroxide, and inorganic persalts, such as the alkali metal perborates, perearbonates,
perphosphates, persilicates and persulphates. Mixtures of two of more such compounds
may also be suitable. Preferred inorganic persalts are sodium perborate monohydrate
and tetrahydrate, and, most preferably, sodium percarbonate.
[0044] Especially preferred is sodium percarbonate having a protective coating against destabilisation
by moisture. Sodium percarbonate having a protective coating comprising sodium metaborate
and sodium silicate is disclosed in GB 2 123 044B (Kao).
[0045] The peroxy bleach compound is suitably present in an amount of from 5 to 35 wt%,
preferably from 10 to 25 wt%.
[0046] The peroxy bleach compound may be used in conjunction with a bleach activator (bleach
precursor) to improve bleaching action at low wash temperatures. The bleach precursor
is suitably present in an amount of from 1 to 8 wt%, preferably from 2 to 5 wt%.
[0047] Preferred bleach precursors are peroxycarboxylic acid precursors, more especially
peracetic acid precursors and peroxybenzoic acid precursors; and peroxycathonic acid
precursors. An especially preferred bleach precursor suitable for use in the present
invention is N,N,N',N'-tetracetyl ethylenediamine (TAED).
[0048] A bleach stabiliser (heavy metal sequestrant) may also be present. Suitable bleach
stabilisers include ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA) and the polyphosphonates such
as Dequest (Trade Mark), EDTMP.
[0049] An especially preferred bleach system comprises a peroxy bleach compound (preferably
sodium percarbonate optionally together with a bleach activator), and a transition
metal bleach catalyst as described and claimed in EP 458 397A, EP 458 398A and EP
509 787A (Unilever).
[0050] Compositions containing relatively large amounts of bleach ingredients will generally
contain correspondingly smaller amounts of surfactant, builder and other ingredients
than will similar light-duty bleach-free formulations. The preferred amounts of surfactant
and zeolite for such formulations will therefore generally be towards the lower ends
of the ranges claimed in the present invention, while the preferred amounts for handwash
or light-duty (non-bleaching) machine wash formulations will be higher.
Other ingredients
[0051] The compositions of the invention may contain alkali metal, preferably sodium, carbonate,
in order to increase detergency and ease processing. Sodium carbonate may suitably
be present in amounts ranging from 1 to 60 wt%, preferably from 2 to 40 wt%. However,
compositions containing little or no sodium carbonate are also within the scope of
the invention.
[0052] Powder flow may be improved by the incorporation of a small amount of a powder structurant,
for example, a fatty acid (or fatty acid soap), a sugar, an acrylate or acrylate/maleale
polymer, or sodium silicate.
[0053] One preferred powder structurant is fatty acid soap, suitably present in an amount
of from 1 to 5 wt%.
[0054] Other materials that may be present in detergent compositions of the invention include
sodium silicate; antiredeposition agents such as cellulosic polymers; fluorescers;
inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate; lather control agents or lather boosters
as appropriate; proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes; dyes; coloured speckles; perfumes;
foam controllers; and fabric softening compounds. This list is not intended to be
exhaustive.
Preparation of the detergent compositions
[0055] The particulate detergent compositions of the invention may be prepared by any method
suitable for the production of powders of high bulk density, ie at least 700 g/litre,
preferably at least 800 g/litre.
[0056] Such powders may be prepared either by post-tower densification of spray-dried powder,
or by wholly non-tower methods such as dry mixing and granulation; in both cases a
high-speed mixer/granulator may advantageously be used.
[0057] Processes using high-speed mixer/granulators are disclosed, for example, in EP 340
013A, EP 367 339A, EP 390 251 A and EP 420 317A (Unilever).
EXAMPLES
[0058] The invention is further illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples, in which
parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated. Examples 6, 12 and 13
are not in accordance with the invention.
[0059] The following abbreviations are used in the Examples:
CocoPAS: linear C12-14, primary alcohol sulphate prepared from coconut-derived linear alcohol: Laurex (Trade
Mark) L1 ex Kolb.
Nonionic 7EO: coconut (linear C12-14) alcohol having an average degree of ethoxylation of 7.0: Lorodac (Trade Mark) 7EO
ex Enichem/DAC.
Nonionic 6.5 EO, nonionic 3EO: corresponding Lorodac materials having lower degrees
of ethoxylation.
Zeolite MAP: zeolite P having a silicon to aluminium ratio of 1.00, as described in
EP 384 070A (Unilever).
Percarbonate: sodium percarbonate having a protective coating as disclosed in GB 2
123 044B (Kao), ex Interox.
TAED: totraacetylethylenediamine, as 83 wt% granules, ex BASF.
Mn catalyst: transition metal bleach catalyst (manganese complex) as described and
claimed in EP 458 397A, EP 458 398A and EP 509 787A (Unilever)
EHTMP: ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonic acid, calcium salt (34 wt% active):
Dequest (Trade Mark) 2047 ex Monsanto.
SCMC: sodium carboxymethylcellulose ex Lamberti.
Antifoam: antifoam granules as described and claimed in EP 266 863B (Unilever).
Powder properties
[0060] Powder flow values are expressed In terms of the dynamic flow rate in ml/s, measured
by means of the following procedure. The apparatus used consists of a cylindrical
glass tube having an intemal diameter of 35 mm and a length of 600 mm. The tube is
securely clamped in a position such that its longitudinal axis is vertical. Its lower
end is terminated by means of a smooth cone of polyvinyl chloride having an internal
angle of 15° and a lower outlet orifice. A first beam sensor is positioned 150 mm
above the outlet, and a second beam sensor is positioned 250 mm above the first sensor.
[0061] To determine the dynamic flow rate of a powder sample, the outlet orifice is temporarily
closed, for example, by covering with a piece of card, and powder is poured through
a funnel into the top of the cylinder until the powder level is about 10 cm higher
than the upper sensor; a spacer between the funnel and the tube ensures that filling
is uniform. The outlet is then opened and the time
t (seconds) taken for the powder level to fall from the upper sensor to the lower sensor
is measured electronically.
[0062] The measurement is normally repeated two or three times and an average value taken.
If
V is the volume (ml) of the tube between the upper and lower sensors, the dynamic flow
rate DFR (ml/s) is given by the following equation:

[0063] The averaging and calculation are carried out electronically and a direct read-out
of the DFR value obtained.
[0064] Values of 90 ml/s and above indicate good flow properties, and values of 120 ml/s
and above indicate outstanding flow properties. The compositions of the invention
generally exhibit dynamic flow rates in excess of 130 ml/s.
Examples 1 and 2, Comparative Example A
[0065] Detergent powders having bulk densities above 700 g/l were prepared by a non-tower
process to the following formulations:
| |
A |
1 |
2 |
| CocoPAS |
6.79 |
14.63 |
14.64 |
| Nonionic 7EO |
6.69 |
4.10 |
7.33 |
| Nonionic 3EO |
8.49 |
3.23 |
- |
| Soap |
2.25 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Zeolite MAP |
36.47 |
23.48 |
24.46 |
| Sodium carbonate |
1.19 |
2.57 |
2.57 |
| SCMC |
0.68 |
0.53 |
0.54 |
| Moisture and salts |
6.13 |
5.02 |
5.13 |
| |
68.70 |
53.57 |
54.66 |
| |
|
|
|
| Sodium citrate |
- |
15.13 |
14.04 |
| |
|
|
|
| Antifoam, fluorescer |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
| Silicate |
3.67 |
3.67 |
3.67 |
| Percarbonate |
16.85 |
16.85 |
16.85 |
| TAED |
3.75 |
3.75 |
3.75 |
| Mn catalyst |
1.27 |
1.27 |
1.27 |
| EDTMP |
0.37 |
0.37 |
0.37 |
| Enzymes |
1.75 |
1.75 |
1.75 |
| Perfume |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
| |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
| |
|
|
|
| Bulk density. (g/l) |
781 |
727 |
775 |
| |
|
|
|
| Dynamic flow rate (ml/s) |
142 |
134 |
148 |
[0066] Compositions 1 and 2 according to the invention had a 2:1 ratio of PAS to noniontc
surfactant, while Comparative Example A had a ratio of PAS to nonionic surfactant
of 0.44:1.
[0067] Comparative Example B was a commercially available high bulk density powder having
a surfactant system consisting of alkylbenzene sulphonate and nonionlc surfactant.
[0068] Delivery characteristics and residues were compared using a washing machine test.
Two front-loading automatic machines were used: the Siemens Siwamat (Trade Mark) Plus
3700, which has a conventional water fill system, and the Zanussi (Trade Mark) Jet
System, which incorporates a spray system to reduce water usage.
[0069] The test methodology was as follows. A 100 g dose of powder was placed in a flexible
delivery device of the type supplied with Lever's Persil (Trade Mark) Micro System
powder in the UK: a spherical container of flexible plastics material having a diameter
of approximately 4 cm and a top opening of diameter approximately 3 cm.
[0070] The delivery device was placed inside a black cotton pillowcase having dimensions
of 30 cm by 60 cm, taking care to keep it upright, and the pillowcase was then closed
by means of a zip fastener. The pillowcase containing the (upright) delivery device
was then placed on top of a 3.5 kg dry cotton washload in the drum of the washing
machine.
[0071] The machine was operated on the "heavy duty cycle" at a wash temperature of 40°C,
using water of 15° French hardness and an inlet temperature of 20°C. At the end of
the wash cycle the pillowcase was removed, opened and tumed inside out, and the level
of powder residues on its inside surfaces determined by visual assessment using a
scoring system of 1 to 5: a score of 3 corresponds to a residue of approximately 75
wt% of the powder, while 0 indicates no residue.
[0072] A panel of five assessors was used to judge each pillowcase and allot a score. With
each powder the wash process was carried out ten times and the scores were averaged
over the ten repeats.
[0073] The results were as shown below.
| Powder |
Zanussi |
Siemens |
| A |
0.5 |
0.6 |
| 1 |
0 |
0 |
| 2 |
0 |
0 |
| B |
2.5 |
1.8 |
[0074] In a further test, delivery of a 100 g powder dose from the dispenser drawer of a
Phillips (Trade Mark) AWB 126/7 washing machine using a 10°C water fill (5 litre/min)
was compared. The results below show the dry weight percentage of powder left behind
as a residue in the dispenser drawer.
| Powder |
Residues (%) |
| A |
11 |
| 1 |
0 |
| 2 |
0 |
| B |
58 |
[0075] It will be noted that the commercially available product (Comparative Example B)
gave residues in excess of 50%, and indeed current products of this type are sold
with delivery devices and are not intended for dosing via the dispenser drawer. The
results above show that the compositions of the invention may be used in the traditional
manner without the need for a delivery device.
Examples 3 and 4
[0076] Compositions containing a 1:1 ratio of PAS to nonionic surfactant were prepared,
to the following formulations:
| |
3 |
4 |
| CocoPAS |
10.99 |
10.97 |
| Nonionic 7EO |
6.14 |
11.00 |
| Nonionic 3EO |
4.84 |
|
| |
|
|
| Zeolite MAP |
28.99 |
28.26 |
| Sodium carbonate |
1.93 |
1.92 |
| SCMC |
0.58 |
0.57 |
| Moisture and salts |
5.03 |
4.95 |
| |
58.49 |
57.67 |
| |
|
|
| Sodium citrate |
10.21 |
11.03 |
| Antifoam, fluorescer |
3.00 |
3.00 |
| Silicate |
3.67 |
3.67 |
| Prcarbonate |
16.85 |
16.85 |
| TAED |
3.75 |
3.75 |
| Mn catalyst |
1.27 |
1.27 |
| EDTMP |
0.37 |
0.37 |
| Enzymes |
1.75 |
1.75 |
| Perfume |
0.65 |
0.65 |
| |
100.00 |
100.00 |
| |
|
|
| Bulk density (g/litre) |
840 |
817 |
| |
|
|
| Dynamic flow rate (ml/s) |
152 |
146 |
Delivery into the washing machine
[0077] Delivery from the dispenser drawer of a Phillips washing machine was measured as
in Examples 1 and 2. The results were as follows, Comparative Example A again being
shown as a control:
| Powder |
Residues (wt%) |
| A |
11 |
| 3 |
0 |
| 4 |
0 |
Examples 1 to 4: Detergency results
[0078] A tergotomeler test was also carried out to compare the detergencies of the compositions
of the invention (Examples 1 to 4) with those of Comparative Example A having a lower
PAS to nonionic surfactant ratio.
[0079] The tergotometer tests were carried out in 15° (French) hard water at a product concentration
of 4.8 g/litre. The temperature and time conditions were as follows: initially 20°C,
warming up to 60°C at 2°/minute, then remaining at 60°C for a 20-minute wash. The
agitation rate throughout was 120 oscillations/minute.
[0080] Detergencies were compared on four different commercially available test cloth monitors:
WFK-10C: mixed fatty and particulate soil (88% wool fat, 12% kaolin) on cotton;
WFK-30C: mixed fatty and particulate soil (88% wool fat, 12% kaolin) on polyester;
EMPA-101: Indian ink (67%) and olive oil (33%) on cotton;
EMPA-104: Indian ink (67%) and olive oil (33%) on polyester/cotton.
[0081] Detergency results, expressed as the differences betweeen the reflectance increases
at 460 nm of the test cloth monitors for the Example under test and those for Comparative
Example A), were as follows:
Example Reflectance difference compared with Comparative Example A
[0082]
| |
WFK-10C |
WFK-30C |
EMPA-101 |
EMPA-104 |
| 1 |
- 0.9 |
- 0.4 |
+ 1.8 |
+0.8 |
| 2 |
- 1.1 |
- 0.8 |
+ 1.0 |
- 0.5 |
| 3 |
- 0.6 |
- 0.8 |
+1.0 |
+0.2 |
| 4 |
-0.5 |
- 0.9 |
+0.8 |
- 0.1 |
| Standard deviation |
4.1 |
3.8 |
2.8 |
2.3 |
[0083] These results demonstrate that there were no significant detergency differences between
the various formulations.
[0084] Subsequent washing machine tests using a range of different test cloths and wash
conditions confirmed that there were no statistically significant differences in detergency.
Example 5
[0085] A composition similar to those of Examples 3 and 4, containing a 1:1 ratio of PAS
to nonionic but having a highe zeolite content and a higher proportion of low-EO nonionic
surfactant, was prepared to the following formulation:
| |
5 |
| CocoPAS |
10.28 |
| Nonionic 7EO |
5.14 |
| Nonionic 3EO |
6.55 |
| |
|
| Zeolite MAP |
38.50 |
| Sodium carbonate |
- |
| SCMC |
0,84 |
| Moisture and salts |
2.93 |
| |
64.24 |
| |
|
| Sodium citrate |
4.46 |
| Antifoam, fluorescer |
3.00 |
| Silicate |
3.67 |
| Prcarbonate |
16.85 |
| TAED |
3.75 |
| Mn catalyst |
1.27 |
| EDTMP |
0.37 |
| Enzymes |
1.75 |
| Perfume |
0.64 |
| |
100.00 |
| |
|
| Bulk density (g/l) |
920 |
| Dynamic flow rate (ml/s) |
123 |
[0086] In the black pillow case test described earlier, this formulation gave zero residues.
Examples 6 to 9
[0087] Four further machine wash formulations having different PAS:nonionic ratios are shown
below.
| |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| CocoPAS |
8.47 |
10.60 |
12.71 |
13.77 |
| Nonionic 6.5EO |
12.71 |
10.58 |
8.47 |
7.41 |
| Soap |
1.95 |
1.63 |
1.30 |
1.14 |
| Zeolite MAP |
34.34 |
26.29 |
18.33 |
14.35 |
| Sodium carbonate |
1.44 |
1.80 |
2.16 |
2.34 |
| SCMC |
0.89 |
0.74 |
0.59 |
0.52 |
| Moisture, salts |
1.80 |
2.26 |
2.71 |
2.93 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Sodium citrate |
7.08 |
14.80 |
22.42 |
26.23 |
| Antifoam/fluorescer |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
| Silicate |
3.67 |
3.67 |
3.67 |
3.67 |
| Percarbonate |
16.85 |
16.85 |
16.85 |
16.85 |
| TAED |
3.75 |
3.75 |
3.75 |
3.75 |
| Mn catalyst |
1.27 |
1.27 |
1.27 |
1.27 |
| EDTMP |
0.37 |
0.37 |
0.37 |
0.37 |
| Enzymes |
1.75 |
1.75 |
1.75 |
1.75 |
| Perfume |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
| |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| PAS:nonionic ratio |
0.67 |
1.00 |
1.50 |
1.86 |
Examples 10 to 14
[0088] Detergent compositions intended for washing fabrics by hand were prepared to the
following formulations:
| |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
| CocoPAS |
13.15 |
19.12 |
24.04 |
21.85 |
20.49 |
| Nonionic 7EO |
7.35 |
5.36 |
6.74 |
6.13 |
5.75 |
| Nonionic 3EO |
5.79 |
4.22 |
5.31 |
4.83 |
4.53 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Zeolite MAP |
34.69 |
30.69 |
38.58 |
35.07 |
32.88 |
| Sodium carbonate |
2.31 |
3.35 |
4.22 |
3.83 |
3.59 |
| SCMC |
0.69 |
0.69 |
0.87 |
0.79 |
0.74 |
| Moisture, salts |
6.02 |
6.56 |
8.25 |
7.50 |
7.03 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sodium citrate |
4.38 |
4.38 |
|
- - |
- |
| Fluorescer |
- |
- |
0.15 |
0.15 |
- |
| Silicate |
5.00 |
5.00 |
10.00 |
6.00 |
7.60 |
| Percarbonate |
14.00 |
14.00 |
|
- - |
- |
| TAED |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|
- - |
- |
| Mn catalyst |
- |
- |
|
- - |
- |
| EDTMP |
0.37 |
0.37 |
|
- - |
- |
| Enzymes |
1.75 |
1.75 |
1.20 |
1.20 |
1.75 |
| Perfume |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
| Sodium sulphate |
- |
- |
- |
12.00 |
15.00 |
| |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio PAS:NI |
1.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
1.99 |
1.99 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bulk density (g/l) |
865 |
880 |
915 |
925 |
915 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic flow rate (ml/s) |
115 |
120 |
135 |
130 |
140 |
[0089] In a handwashing test, the foam profiles of these compositions were compared with
that of a commercially available composition (Comparative Example B) having the following
formulation:
| |
B |
| LAS |
20.00 |
| Nonionic 7EO |
2.00 |
| Zeolite 4A |
25.00 |
| Sodium silicate |
2.00 |
| Sodium carbonate |
10.00 |
| SCMC |
1.00 |
| Acrylic/maleic copolymer |
4.00 |
| Fluorescer |
0.20 |
| Sodium sulphate |
26.00 |
| Enzymes |
2.00 |
| Water |
7.80 |
| |
100.00 |
| |
|
| Ratio LAS : nonionic |
10.0 |
| |
|
| Bulk density |
450 g/litre |
| |
|
| Dynamic flow rate |
84 ml/s |
Foam height
[0090] As a measure of foam generation in the hand wash, foam heights at a product dosage
of 3 g/l in 250 ml of 10° (French) hard water in a 1-litre measuring cylinder (diameter
6 cm) at 20°C was determined. The cylinder was inverted twice before reading the foam
height. The results were as follows:
| Composition |
Foam height (cm) |
| initial |
after 10 minutes |
| B |
12 |
8 |
| 10 |
14 |
9 |
| 11 |
17 |
11 |
| 12 |
18 |
12 |
| 13 |
17.5 |
12 |
| 14 |
18 |
13 |
[0091] Thus all the compositions of the invention generated more foam than the control.
Compositions 11 to 14 having a PAS to nonionic surfactant ratio of 2:1 were especially
good, but Composition 10 having the lower ratio of 1:1 was also better than the control.
Foam behaviour in the rinse
[0092] With each composition, a handwash was performed in 10 litres of 18° (French) hard
water in a bowl at 40°C. The product dosage was 3 g/l, and the washload consisted
of 1.5 kg of light cotton shirts. Five agitations of the load were carried out in
20 seconds. The wash liquor was then drained away, a further 5 litres of water (10°C)
added, the load was agitated for 20 seconds, the foam was assessed, and then the rinse
water was drained away. The rinse operation was repeated until only a tew bubbles
were left behind on the rim of the bowl. The following table gives the number of rinse
operations required to reach this endpoint: in this test, Composition 10 (PAS:nonionic
ratio 1:1) gave especially good results, and Compositions 11, 13 and 14 were also
better than the control.
| Example |
Number of rinses required to "zero foam" endpoint |
| B |
4 |
| 10 |
2 |
| 11 |
3 |
| 12 |
4 |
| 13 |
3 |
| 14 |
3 |
Dissolution
[0093] In this test, the times required for 90% dissolution to take place in 500 ml of deionised
water at 20°C in a 750 ml glass beaker fitted with a magnetic stirrer (length 3 cm)
rotating at 100 rpm were determined. The ionic strength was used as a measure of dissolution,
the ionic strength after 60 minutes being taken as 100% dissolution (including a visual
check). The results were as follows:
| |
Time for 90% dissolution (sec) |
| B |
245 |
| 10 |
190 |
| 11 |
174 |
| 12 |
230 |
| 13 |
210 |
| 14 |
205 |
[0094] All the compositions of the invention were better than the control, Compositions
10 and 11 giving especially good results.