[0001] The invention relates to silver halide photography. More specifically, the invention
relates to improved spectrally sensitized silver halide emulsions and to multilayer
photographic elements incorporating one or more of these emulsions.
[0002] Kofron et al U.S. Patent 4,439,520 ushered in the current era of high performance
silver halide photography. Kofron et al disclosed and demonstrated striking photographic
advantages for chemically and spectrally sensitized tabular grain emulsions in which
tabular grains having a diameter of at least 0.6 µm and a thickness of less than 0.3
µm exhibit an average aspect ratio of greater than 8 and account for greater than
50 percent of total grain projected area. In the numerous emulsions demonstrated one
or more of these numerical parameters often far exceeded the stated requirements.
Kofron et al recognized that the chemically and spectrally sensitized emulsions disclosed
in one or more of their various forms would be useful in color photography and in
black-and-white photography (including indirect radiography). Spectral sensitizations
in all portions of the visible spectrum and at longer wavelengths were addressed as
well as orthochromatic and panchromatic spectral sensitizations for black-and-white
imaging applications. Kofron et al employed combinations of one or more spectral sensitizing
dyes along with middle chalcogen (e.g., sulfur) and/or noble metal (e.g., gold) chemical
sensitizations, although still other, conventional sensitizations, such as reduction
sensitization were also disclosed.
[0003] An early, cross-referenced variation on the teachings of Kofron et al was provided
by Maskasky U.S. Patent 4,435,501, hereinafter referred to as Maskasky I. Maskasky
I recognized that a site director, such as iodide ion, an aminoazaindene, or a selected
spectral sensitizing dye, adsorbed to the surfaces of host tabular grains was capable
of directing silver salt epitaxy to selected sites, typically the edges and/or corners,
of the host grains. Depending upon the composition and site of the silver salt epitaxy,
significant increases in speed were observed. The most highly controlled site depositions
(e.g., corner specific epitaxy siting) and the highest reported photographic speeds
reported by Maskasky I were obtained by epitaxially depositing silver chloride onto
silver iodobromide tabular grains.
[0004] Maskasky I at column 26, lines 7 to 28, discloses various alternative dopants for
the silver salt epitaxy and different effects which the dopants can provide.
[0005] Maskasky U.S. Patent 4,471,050, hereinafter referred to as Maskasky II, discloses
that nonisomorphic silver salts can be selectively deposited on the edges of silver
halide host grains without relying on a supplemental site director. The nonisomorphic
silver salts include silver thiocyanate, β phase silver iodide (which exhibits a hexagonal
wurtzite type crystal structure), γ phase silver iodide (which exhibits a zinc blende
type crystal structure), silver phosphates (including meta- and pyro-phosphates) and
silver carbonate. None of these nonisomorphic silver salts exhibit a face centered
cubic crystal structure of the type found in photographic silver halides--i.e., an
isomorphic face centered cubic crystal structure of the rock salt type. In fact, speed
enhancements produced by nonisomorphic silver salt epitaxy have been much smaller
than those obtained by comparable isomorphic silver salt epitaxial sensitizations.
[0006] Shallow electron trapping (SET) site providing dopants for silver halide emulsions
are disclosed in
Research Disclosure , Vol. 367, November 1994, Item 36736.
[0007] Notwithstanding the many advantages of tabular grain emulsions in general and the
specific improvements to color photographic elements in which they are employed, there
has remained an unsatisfied need for performance improvements in tabular grain emulsions
heretofore unavailable in the art. Specifically, there has remained a need for tabular
grain emulsions that produce a better relationship between speed and granularity,
which can be taken in terms of increased speed, lower granularity, or a combination
of both.
[0008] In one aspect this invention is directed to an improved radiation-sensitive emulsion
comprised of (1) a dispersing medium, (2) silver halide grains including tabular grains
(a) having {111} major faces, (b) containing greater than 70 mole percent bromide
and at least 0.25 mole percent iodide, based on silver, (c) accounting for greater
than 90 percent of total grain projected area, (d) exhibiting an average equivalent
circular diameter of at least 0.7 µm, (e) having an average thickness in the range
of from less than 0.3 µm to at least 0.07 µm, and (f) having latent image forming
chemical sensitization sites on the surfaces of the tabular grains, and (3) a spectral
sensitizing dye adsorbed to the surfaces of the tabular grains, characterized in that
the surface chemical sensitization sites include silver halide protrusions forming
epitaxial junctions with the tabular grains, the protrusions being located on up to
50 percent of the surface area of the tabular grains, having a higher overall solubility
than at least that portion of the tabular grains forming epitaxial junctions with
the protrusions, forming a face centered cubic crystal lattice, and including a speed
enhancing dopant comprised of a coordination complex that (a) displaces ions in the
silver halide crystal lattice of the protrusions and exhibits a net valance more positive
than the net valence of the ions it displaces, (b) contains at least one ligand that
is more electronegative than any halide ion, (c) contains a metal ion having a positive
valence of from +2 to +4 and having its highest energy electron occupied molecular
orbital filled, and (d) has its lowest energy unoccupied molecular orbital at an energy
level higher than the lowest energy conduction band of the silver halide crystal lattice
forming the protrusions.
[0009] It has been observed quite surprisingly that the speed increases imparted to tabular
grain emulsions by silver halide epitaxy can be further increased by employing dopants
that are selected to provide shallow electron trapping sites within the silver halide
epitaxy. This addresses the problem of the art of requiring tabular grain emulsions
that exhibit better speed-granularity relationships that can be applied to obtaining
higher speed, lower granularity or a combination of both.
[0010] The invention is directed to an improvement in spectrally sensitized photographic
emulsions. The emulsions are specifically contemplated for incorporation in camera
speed color photographic films.
[0011] The emulsions of the invention can be realized by chemically and spectrally sensitizing
any conventional tabular grain emulsion in which the tabular grains
(a) have {111} major faces;
(b) contain greater than 70 mole percent bromide and at least 0.25 mole percent iodide,
based on silver;
(c) account for greater than 90 percent of total grain projected area;
(d) exhibit an average equivalent circular diameter (ECD) of at least 0.7 µm; and
(e) have an average thickness in the range of from less than 0.3 µm to at least 0.07
µm.
[0012] Tabular grain emulsions satisfying criteria (a) through (e) are, apart from their
sensitization, which is the subject of this invention, conventional. The following
provide illustrative teachings of tabular grain emulsions satisfying these criteria:
Wilgus et al U.S. Patent 4,434,226;
Kofron et al U.S. Patent 4,439,520;
Daubendiek et al U.S. Patent 4,414,310;
Solberg et al U.S. Patent 4,433,048;
Yamada et al U.S. Patent 4,672,027;
Sugimoto et al U.S. Patent 4,665,012;
Yamada et al U.S. Patent 4,679,745;
Maskasky U.S. Patent 4,713,320;
Nottorf U.S. Patent 4,722,886;
Sugimoto U.S. Patent 4,755,456;
Goda U.S. Patent 4,775,617;
Ellis U.S. Patent 4,801,522;
Ikeda et al U.S. Patent 4,806,461;
Ohashi et al U.S. Patent 4,835,095;
Makino et al U.S. Patent 4,835,322;
Daubendiek et al U.S. Patent 4,914,014;
Aida et al U.S. Patent 4,962,015;
Ikeda et al U.S. Patent 4,985,350;
Piggin et al U.S. Patent 5,061,609;
Piggin et al U.S. Patent 5,061,616;
Tsaur et al U.S. Patent 5,147,771;
Tsaur et al U.S. Patent 5,147,772;
Tsaur et al U.S. Patent 5,147,773;
Tsaur et al U.S. Patent 5,171,659;
Sutton et al U.S. Patent 5,300,413;
Delton U.S. Patent 5,310,644;
Chang et al U.S. Patent 5,314,793;
Black et al U.S. Patent 5,334,495;
Chaffee et al U.S. Patent 5,358,840; and
Delton U.S. Patent 5,372,927.
[0013] In referring to grains and emulsions containing more than one halide, the halides
are named in their order of ascending concentration. For camera speed films it is
generally preferred that the tabular grains contain at least 0.25 (preferably at least
1.0) mole percent iodide, based on silver. The tabular grains in the emulsions of
the invention contain in all instances less than 10 mole percent iodide, preferably
less than 6 mole percent iodide, and optimally less than 4 mole percent iodide. It
is possible to include minor amounts of chloride ion in the tabular grains. For example,
Delton U.S. Patent 5,372,927, cited above, discloses tabular grain emulsions containing
from 0.4 to 20 mole percent chloride and up to 10 mole percent iodide, based on total
silver, with the halide balance being bromide.
[0014] The tabular grains accounting for at least 90 percent of total grain projected area
contain at least 70 mole percent bromide and at least 0.25 mole percent iodide, based
on silver. These tabular grains include silver iodobromide, silver iodochlorobromide
and silver chloroiodobromide grains. All references to the composition of the tabular
grains exclude the silver halide epitaxy.
[0015] The iodide within the tabular grains can be uniformly or non-uniformly distributed
in any conventional manner. For example, the emulsions of Wilgus et al U.S. Patent
4,434,226 and Kofron et al U.S. Patent 4,439,520, cited above, illustrate conventional
uniform iodide silver iodobromide tabular grain emulsions. The emulsions of Solberg
et al U.S. Patent 4,433,048 and Chang et al U.S. Patent 5,314,793, cited above, illustrate
specifically preferred non-uniform iodide placements in silver iodobromide tabular
grains that increase photographic speed without increasing granularity. In the tabular
grains of the emulsions of the present invention it is specifically preferred that
at least the portions of the tabular grains extending between their {111} major faces
that form an epitaxial junction with silver halide deposited as a chemical sensitizer
contain a lower iodide concentration than the silver halide epitaxy. Most preferably
the tabular grains contain a lower concentration throughout than the silver halide
epitaxy, and, optimally, the tabular grains contain less total iodide that the silver
halide epitaxy.
[0016] The tabular grains in the emulsions of the invention all have {111} major faces.
Such tabular grains typically have triangular or hexagonal major faces. The tabular
structure of the grains is attributed to the inclusion of parallel twin planes.
[0017] The tabular grains of the emulsions of the invention account for greater than 90
percent of total grain projected area. Tabular grain emulsions in which the tabular
grains account for greater than 97 percent of total grain projected area are preferred.
Most preferably greater than 99 percent (substantially all) of total grain projected
area is accounted for by tabular grains. Emulsions of this type are illustrated, for
example, by Tsaur et al and Delton, cited above. Providing emulsions in which the
tabular grains account for a high percentage of total grain projected area is important
to achieving the highest attainable image sharpness levels, particularly in multilayer
color photographic films. It is also important to utilizing silver efficiently and
to achieving the most favorable speed-granularity relationships.
[0018] The tabular grains accounting for greater than 90 percent of total grain projected
area exhibit an average ECD of at least 0.7 µm. The advantage to be realized by maintaining
the average ECD of at least 0.7 µm is demonstrated in Tables III and IV of Antoniades
et al U.S. Patent 5,250,403. Although emulsions with extremely large average grain
ECD's are occasionally prepared for scientific grain studies, for photographic applications
ECD's are conventionally limited to less than 10 µm and in most instances are less
than 5 µm. An optimum ECD range for moderate to high image structure quality is in
the range of from 1 to 4 µm.
[0019] In the tabular grain emulsions of the invention the tabular grains accounting for
greater than 90 percent of total grain projected area exhibit a mean thickness in
the range of from less than 0.3 µm to 0.07 µm. Emulsions with greater tabular grain
thicknesses are taught by Kofron et al, cited above, to be useful for recording blue
exposures, but they are definitely inferior for recording in the minus blue (i.e.,
green and/or red) portion of the spectrum. Efficient levels of imaging with lower
silver requirements can be realized when average tabular grain thicknesses are maintained
less than 0.3 µm and spectral sensitizing dyes are employed. When the tabular grains
have a minimum mean thickness of at least 0.07 µm a much wider range of emulsion preparation
procedures and conditions are available than are required to produce tabular grain
emulsions with mean grain thicknesses of less than 0.07 µm.
[0020] Preferred tabular grain emulsions are those in which grain to grain variance is held
to low levels. It is preferred that greater than 90 percent of the tabular grains
have hexagonal major faces. Preferred tabular grain emulsions exhibit a coefficient
of variation (COV) based on ECD of less than 25 percent, most preferably less than
20 percent. COV as herein employed is 100 times the quotient of the standard deviation
(σ) of ECD divided by mean ECD.
[0021] It is recognized that both photographic sensitivity and granularity increase with
increasing mean grain ECD. From comparisons of sensitivities and granularities of
optimally sensitized emulsions of differing grain ECD's the art has established that
with each doubling in speed (i.e., 0.3 log E increase in speed, where E is exposure
in lux-seconds) emulsions exhibiting the same speed-granularity relationship will
incur a granularity increase of 7 granularity units.
[0022] It has been observed that the presence of even a small percentage of larger ECD grains
in tabular grain emulsions of the invention can produce a significant increase in
emulsion granularity. A conventional solution is to employ low COV emulsions, since
placing restrictions on COV necessarily draws the tabular grain ECD's present closer
to the mean.
[0023] It is a recognition of this invention that COV is not the best approach for judging
emulsion granularity. Requiring low emulsion COV values places restrictions on both
the grain populations larger than and smaller than the mean grain ECD, whereas it
is only the former grain population that is driving granularity to higher levels.
The art's reliance on overall COV measurements has been predicated on the assumption
that grain size-frequency distributions, whether widely or narrowly dispersed, are
Gaussian error function distributions that are inherent in precipitation procedures
and not readily controlled.
[0024] It is specifically contemplated to conventional tabular grain precipitation procedures
to decrease selectively the size-frequency distribution of the tabular grains exhibiting
an ECD larger than the mean ECD of the emulsions. Because the size-frequency distribution
of grains having ECD's less than the mean is not being correspondingly reduced, the
result is that overall COV values are not appreciably reduced. However, the advantageous
reductions in emulsion granularity have been clearly established.
[0025] It has been discovered that disproportionate size range reductions in the size-frequency
distributions of tabular grains having greater than mean ECD's (hereinafter referred
to as the >ECD
av. grains) can be realized by modifying the procedure for precipitation of the tabular
grain emulsions in the following manner: Tabular grain nucleation is conducted employing
gelatino-peptizers that have not been treated to reduce their natural methionine content
while grain growth is conducted after substantially eliminating the methionine content
of the gelatino-peptizers present and subsequently introduced. A convenient approach
for accomplishing this is to interrupt precipitation after nucleation and before growth
has progressed to any significant degree to introduce a methionine oxidizing agent.
[0026] Any of the conventional techniques for oxidizing the methionine of a gelatino-peptizer
can be employed. Maskasky U.S. Patent 4,713,320 (hereinafter referred to as Maskasky
III) teaches to reduce methionine levels by oxidation to less than 30 µmoles, preferably
less than 12 µmoles, per gram of gelatin by employing a strong oxidizing agent. In
fact, the oxidizing agent treatments that Maskasky III employ reduce methionine below
detectable limits. Examples of agents that have been employed for oxidizing the methionine
in gelatino-peptizers include NaOCl, chloramine, potassium monopersulfate, hydrogen
peroxide and peroxide releasing compounds, and ozone. King et al U.S. Patent 4,942,120
teaches oxidizing the methionine component of gelatino-peptizers with an alkylating
agent. Takada et al published European patent application 0 434 012 discloses precipitating
in the presence of a thiosulfonate of one of the following formulae:
(I) R-SO₂S-M
(II) R-SO₂S-R¹
(III) R-SO₂S-Lm-SSO₂-R
where R, R¹ and R are either the same or different and represent an aliphatic group,
an aromatic group, or a heterocyclic group, M represents a cation, L represents a
divalent linking group, and m is 0 or 1, wherein R, R¹, R and L combine to form a
ring. Gelatino-peptizers include gelatin--e.g., alkali-treated gelatin (cattle, bone
or hide gelatin) or acid-treated gelatin (pigskin gelatin) and gelatin derivatives,
e.g., acetylated or phthalated gelatin.
[0027] The chemical and spectral sensitizations of this invention improve upon the best
chemical and spectral sensitizations disclosed by Maskasky I. In the practice of the
present invention tabular grains receive during chemical sensitization epitaxially
deposited silver halide forming protrusions at selected sites on the tabular grain
surfaces. The protrusions exhibit a higher overall solubility than the silver halide
forming at least those portions of the tabular grains that serve as epitaxial deposition
host sites--i.e., that form an epitaxial junction with the silver halide being deposited.
By higher overall solubility it is meant that the average solubility of the silver
halides forming the protrusions must be higher than the mole fraction weighted average
solubility of the silver halides forming the host portions of the tabular grains.
The solubility products, K
sp, of AgCl, AgBr and AgI in water at temperatures ranging from 0 to 100°C are reported
in Table 1.4, page 6, Mees,
The Theory of the Photographic Process, 3rd Ed., Macmillan, New York (1966). For example, at 40°C, a common emulsion preparation
temperature, the solubility product of AgCl is 6.22 X 10⁻¹⁰, AgBr is 2.44 X 10⁻¹ and
AgI is 6.95 X 10⁻¹⁶. Because of the large differences of silver halide solubilities
it is apparent that the epitaxially deposited silver halide must in the overwhelming
majority of instances contain a lower iodide concentration than the portions of the
host tabular grains on which epitaxial deposition occurs. Requiring the epitaxially
deposited protrusions to exhibit a higher overall solubility than at least those portions
of the tabular grains on which they are deposited reduces displacement of halide ions
from the tabular grains, thereby avoiding degradation of the tabular configuration
of the grains.
[0028] Maskasky I observed that the double jet addition of silver and chloride ions during
epitaxial deposition onto selected sites of silver iodobromide tabular grains produced
the highest increases in photographic sensitivities. In the practice of the present
invention it is contemplated that the silver halide protrusions will in all instances
be precipitated to contain at least a 10 percent, preferably at least a 15 percent
and optimally at least a 20 percent higher chloride concentration than the host tabular
grains. It would be more precise to reference the higher chloride concentration in
the silver halide protrusions to the chloride ion concentration in the epitaxial junction
forming portions of the tabular grains, but this is not necessary, since the chloride
ion concentrations of the tabular grains are contemplated to be substantially uniform
(i.e., to be at an average level) or to decline slightly due to iodide displacement
in the epitaxial junction regions.
[0029] Contrary to the teachings of Maskasky I, it has been observed that improvements in
photographic speed and contrast can be realized by adding iodide ions along with silver
and chloride ions to the tabular grain emulsions while performing epitaxial deposition.
This results in increasing the concentration of iodide in the epitaxial protrusions
above the low (substantially less than 1 mole percent) levels of iodide that migrate
from the silver iodobromide host tabular grains during silver and chloride ion addition.
Although any increase in the iodide concentration of the face centered cubic crystal
lattice structure of the epitaxial protrusions improves photographic performance,
it is preferred to increase the iodide concentration to a level of at least 1.0 mole
percent, preferably at least 1.5 mole percent, based on the silver in the silver halide
protrusions. The addition of bromide ions along with chloride and iodide ions increases
the amounts of iodide that can be incorporated in the silver halide epitaxy while,
surprisingly, increasing the level of bromide does not detract from the increases
in photographic speed and contrast observed to result from increased iodide incorporations.
The generally accepted solubilities of silver iodide in silver bromide and silver
chloride is 40 and 13 mole percent, respectively, based on total silver, with mixtures
of silver bromide and chloride accomodating intermediate amounts of silver iodide,
depending on the molar ratio of Br:Cl. It is preferred that the silver iodide in the
epitaxy be maintained at less than 10 mole percent, based on total silver in the epitaxy.
It is further preferred that the overall solubility of the silver halide epitaxy remain
higher than that of the portions of the tabular grains serving as deposition sites
for epitaxial deposition. The overall solubility of mixed silver halides is the mole
fraction weighted average of the solubilities of the individual silver halides.
[0030] It is believed that the highest levels of photographic performance are realized when
the silver halide epitaxy contains both (1) the large differences in chloride concentrations
between the host tabular grains and the epitaxially deposited protrusions noted above
and (2) elevated levels of iodide inclusion in the face centered cubic crystal lattice
structure of the protrusions.
[0031] Subject to the composition modifications specifically described above, preferred
techniques for chemical and spectral sensitization can be similar to those described
by Maskasky I, cited above. Maskasky I reports improvements in sensitization by epitaxially
depositing silver halide at selected sites on the surfaces of the host tabular grains.
Maskasky I attributes the speed increases observed to restricting silver halide epitaxy
deposition to a small fraction of the host tabular grain surface area. It is contemplated
to restrict silver halide epitaxy to less than 50 percent of the tabular grain surface
area and, preferably, to a greater extent, as taught by Maskasky I. Specifically,
Maskasky I teaches to restrict silver halide epitaxy to less than 25 percent, preferably
less than 10 percent, and optimally less than 5 percent of the host grain surface
area. When the tabular grains contain a lower iodide concentration central region
and a higher iodide laterally displaced region, as taught by Solberg et al and Daubendiek
et al II, it is preferred to restrict the silver halide epitaxy to those portions
of the tabular grains that are formed by the laterally displaced regions, which typically
includes the edges and corners of the tabular grains.
[0032] When the iodide concentrations of different portions of the tabular grains differ,
it is recognized that the iodide concentration of the epitaxial protrusions can be
higher than the overall average concentration of the host tabular grains without risking
disruption of the tabular grain structure, provided that the iodide concentrations
of the portions of the tabular grains that provide the deposition sites of the epitaxial
protrusions are higher than the iodide concentrations of the epitaxial protrusions.
[0033] Like Maskasky I, nominal amounts of silver halide epitaxy (as low as 0.05 mole percent,
based on total silver, where total silver includes that in the host and epitaxy) are
effective in the practice of the invention. Because of the increased host tabular
grain surface area coverages by silver halide epitaxy discussed above and the lower
amounts of silver in tabular grains, an even higher percentage of the total silver
can be present in the silver halide epitaxy. However, in the absence of any clear
advantage to be gained by increasing the proportion of silver halide epitaxy, it is
preferred that the silver halide epitaxy be limited to 50 percent of total silver.
Generally silver halide epitaxy concentrations of from 0.3 to 25 mole percent are
preferred, with concentrations of from about 0.5 to 15 mole percent being generally
optimum for sensitization.
[0034] Maskasky I teaches various techniques for restricting the surface area coverage of
the host tabular grains by silver halide epitaxy that can be applied in forming the
emulsions of this invention. Maskasky I teaches employing spectral sensitizing dyes
that are in their aggregated form of adsorption to the tabular grain surfaces capable
of direct silver halide epitaxy to the edges or corners of the tabular grains. Cyanine
dyes that are adsorbed to host tabular grain surfaces in their J-aggregated form constitute
a specifically preferred class of site directors. Maskasky I also teaches to employ
non-dye adsorbed site directors, such as aminoazaindenes (e.g., adenine) to direct
epitaxy to the edges or corners of the tabular grains. In still another form Maskasky
I relies on overall iodide levels within the host tabular grains of at least 8 mole
percent to direct epitaxy to the edges or corners of the tabular grains. In yet another
form Maskasky I adsorbs low levels of iodide to the surfaces of the host tabular grains
to direct epitaxy to the edges and/or corners of the grains. The above site directing
techniques are mutually compatible and are in specifically preferred forms of the
invention employed in combination. For example, iodide in the host grains, even though
it does not reach the 8 mole percent level that will permit it alone to direct epitaxy
to the edges or corners of the host tabular grains can nevertheless work with adsorbed
surface site director(s) (e.g., spectral sensitizing dye and/or adsorbed iodide) in
siting the epitaxy.
[0035] It is generally accepted that selective site deposition of silver halide epitaxy
onto host tabular grains improves sensitivity by reducing sensitization site competition
for conduction band electrons released by photon absorption on imagewise exposure.
Thus, epitaxy over a limited protion of the major faces of the tabular grains is more
efficient than that overlying all or most of the major faces, still better is epitaxy
that is substantially confined to the edges of the host tabular grains, with limited
coverage of their major faces, and still more efficient is epitaxy that is confined
at or near the corners or other discrete sites of the tabular grains. The spacing
of the corners of the major faces of the host tabular grains in itself reduces photoelectron
competition sufficiently to allow near maximum sensitivities to be realized. Maskasky
I teaches that slowing the rate of epitaxial deposition can reduce the number of epitaxial
deposition sites on a host tabular grain. Yamashita et al U.S. Patent 5,011,767 carries
this further and suggests specific spectral sensitizing dyes and conditions for producing
a single epitaxial junction per host grain. When the host tabular grains contain a
higher iodide concentration in laterally displaced regions, as taught by Solberg et
al, it is recognized that enhanced photographic performance is realized by restricting
silver halide protrusions to the higher iodide laterally displaced regions.
[0036] It is a specific recognition of this invention that improvements in photographic
performance compatible with the advantages elsewhere described can be realized by
incorporating a dopant capable of increasing photographic speed by forming shallow
elec tron traps. When a photon is absorbed by a silver halide grain, an electron (hereinafter
referred to as a photoelectron) is promoted from the valence band of the silver halide
crystal lattice to its conduction band, creating a hole (hereinafter referred to as
a photohole) in the valence band. To create a latent image site within the grain,
a plurality of photoelectrons produced in a single imagewise exposure must reduce
several silver ions in the crystal lattice to form a small cluster of Ag
o atoms. To the extent that photoelectrons are dissipated by competing mechanisms before
the latent image can form, the photographic sensitivity of the silver halide grains
is reduced. For example, if the photoelectron returns to the photohole, its energy
is dissipated without contributing to latent image formation.
[0037] It is contemplated to dope the silver halide epitaxy to create within it shallow
electron traps that contribute to utilizing photoelectrons for latent image formation
with greater efficiency. This is achieved by incorporating in the face centered cubic
crystal lattice a dopant that exhibits a net valence more positive than the net valence
of the ion or ions it displaces in the crystal lattice. For example, in the simplest
possible form the dopant can be a polyvalent (+2 to +5) metal ion that displaces silver
ion (Ag⁺) in the crystal lattice structure. The substitution of a divalent cation,
for example, for the monovalent Ag⁺ cation leaves the crystal lattice with a local
net positive charge. This lowers the energy of the conduction band locally. The amount
by which the local energy of the conduction band is lowered can be estimated by applying
the effective mass approximation as described by J. F. Hamilton in the journal
Advances in Physics, Vol. 37 (1988) p. 395 and
Excitonic Processes in Solids by M. Ueta, H. Kansaki, K. Kobayshi, Y. Toyozawa and E. Hanamura (1986), published
by Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 359. If a silver chloride crystal lattice structure
receives a net positive charge of +1 by doping, the energy of its conduction band
is lowered in the vicinity of the dopant by about 0.048 electron volts (eV). For a
net positive charge of +2 the shift is about 0.192 eV. For a silver bromide crystal
lattice structure a net positive charge of +1 imparted by doping lowers the conduction
band energy locally by about 0.026 eV. For a net positive charge of +2 the energy
is lowered by about 0.104 eV.
[0038] When photoelectrons are generated by the absorption of light, they are attracted
by the net positive charge at the dopant site and temporarily held (i.e., bound or
trapped) at the dopant site with a binding energy that is equal to the local decrease
in the conduction band energy. The dopant that causes the localized bending of the
conduction band to a lower energy is referred to as a shallow electron trap because
the binding energy holding the photoelectron at the dopant site (trap) is insufficient
to hold the electron permanently at the dopant site. Nevertheless, shallow electron
trapping sites are useful. For example, a large burst of photoelectrons generated
by a high intensity exposure can be held briefly in shallow electron traps to protect
them against immediate dissipation while still allowing their efficient migration
over a period of time to latent image forming sites.
[0039] For a dopant to be useful in forming a shallow electron trap it must satisfy additional
criteria beyond simply providing a net valence more positive than the net valence
of the ion or ions it displaces in the crystal lattice. When a dopant is incorporated
into the silver halide crystal lattice, it creates in the vicinity of the dopant new
electron energy levels (orbitals) in addition to those energy levels or orbitals which
comprised the silver halide valence and conduction bands. For a dopant to be useful
as a shallow electron trap it must satisfy these additional criteria: (1) its
highest energy electron
occupied molecular
orbital (HOMO, also commonly referred to as the frontier orbital) must be filled--e.g.,
if the orbital will hold two electrons (the maximum possible number), it must contain
two electrons and not one and (2) its
lowest energy
unoccupied
molecular
orbital (LUMO) must be at a higher energy level than the lowest energy level conduction
band of the silver halide crystal lattice. If conditions (1) and/or (2) are not satisfied,
there will be a local, dopant-derived orbital in the crystal lattice (either an unfilled
HOMO or a LUMO) at a lower energy than the local, dopant-induced conduction band minimum
energy, and photoelectrons will preferentially be held at this lower energy site and
thus impede the efficient migration of photoelectrons to latent image forming sites.
[0040] Metal ions satisfying criteria (1) and (2) are the following: Group 2 metal ions
with a valence of +2, Group 3 metal ions with a valence of +3 but excluding the rare
earth elements 58-71, which do not satisfy criterion (1), Group 12 metal ions with
a valence of +2 (but excluding Hg, which is a strong desensitizer, possibly because
of spontaneous reversion to Hg⁺¹), Group 13 metal ions with a valence of +3, Group
14 metal ions with a valence of +2 or +4 and Group 15 metal ions with a valence of
+3 or +5. Of the metal ions satisfying criteria (1) and (2) those preferred on the
basis of practical convenience for incorporation as dopants include the following
period 4, 5 and 6 elements: lanthanum, zinc, cadmium, gallium, indium, thallium, germanium,
tin, lead and bismuth. Specifically preferred metal ion dopants satisfying criteria
(1) and (2) for use in forming shallow electron traps are zinc, cadmium, indium, lead
and bismuth. Specific examples of shallow electron trap dopants of these types are
provided by DeWitt, Gilman et al, Atwell et al, Weyde et al and Murakima et al EPO
0 590 674 and 0 563 946, each cited above.
[0041] Metal ions in Groups 8, 9 and 10 (hereinafter collectively referred to as Group VIII
metal ions) that have their frontier orbitals filled, thereby satisfying criterion
(1), have also been investigated. These are Group 8 metal ions with a valence of +2,
Group 9 metal ions with a valence of +3 and Group 10 metal ions with a valence of
+4. It has been observed that these metal ions are incapable of forming efficient
shallow electron traps when incorporated as bare metal ion dopants. This is attributed
to the LUMO lying at an energy level below the lowest energy level conduction band
of the silver halide crystal lattice.
[0042] However, coordination complexes of these Group VIII metal ions as well as Ga⁺³ and
In⁺³, when employed as dopants, can form efficient shallow electron traps. The requirement
of the frontier orbital of the metal ion being filled satisfies criterion (1). For
criterion (2) to be satisfied at least one of the ligands forming the coordination
complex must be more strongly electron withdrawing than halide (i.e., more electron
withdrawing than a fluoride ion, which is the most highly electron withdrawing halide
ion).
[0043] One common way of assessing electron withdrawing characteristics is by reference
to the spectro-chemical series of ligands, derived from the absorption spectra of
metal ion complexes in solution, referenced in
Inorganic Chemistry: Principles of Structure and Reactivity, by James E. Huheey, 1972, Harper and Row, New York and in
Absorption Spectra and Chemical Bonding in Complexes by C. K. Jorgensen, 1962, Pergamon Press, London. From these references the following
order of ligands in the spectrochemical series is apparent:

The abbreviations used are as follows: ox = oxalate, dipy = dipyridine, phen =
o-phenathroline, and phosph = 4-methyl-2,6,7-trioxa-1-phosphabicyclo[2.2.2]octane.
The spectrochemical series places the ligands in sequence in their electron withdrawing
properties, the first (I⁻) ligand in the series is the least electron withdrawing
and the last (CO) ligand being the most electron withdrawing. The underlining indicates
the site of ligand bonding to the polyvalent metal ion. The efficiency of a ligand
in raising the LUMO value of the dopant complex increases as the ligand atom bound
to the metal changes from Cl to S to O to N to C. Thus, the ligands
CN⁻ and
CO are especially preferred. Other preferred ligands are thiocyanate (
NCS⁻), selenocyanate (
NCSe⁻), cyanate (
NCO⁻), tellurocyanate (
NCTe⁻) and azide (N₃⁻).
[0044] Just as the spectrochemical series can be applied to ligands of coordination complexes,
it can also be applied to the metal ions. The following spectrochemical series of
metal ions is reported in
Absorption Spectra and Chemical Bonding by C. K. Jorgensen, 1962, Pergamon Press, London:

The metal ions in boldface type satisfy frontier orbital requirement (1) above. Although
this listing does not contain all the metal ions which are specifically contemplated
for use in coordination complexes as dopants, the position of the remaining metals
in the spectrochemical series can be identified by noting that an ion's position in
the series shifts from Mn⁺, the least electronegative metal, toward Pt⁺⁴, the most
electronegative metal, as the ion's place in the Periodic Table of Elements increases
from period 4 to period 5 to period 6. The series position also shifts in the same
direction when the positive charge increases. Thus, Os⁺³, a period 6 ion, is more
electronegative than Pd⁺⁴, the most electronegative period 5 ion, but less electronegative
than Pt⁺⁴, the most electronegative period 6 ion.
[0045] From the discussion above Rh⁺³, Ru⁺³, Pd⁺⁴, Ir⁺³, Os⁺³ and Pt⁺⁴ are clearly the most
electro-negative metal ions satisfying frontier orbital requirement
(1) above and are therefore specifically preferred. To satisfy the LUMO requirements
of criterion
(2) above the filled frontier orbital polyvalent metal ions of Group VIII are incorporated
in a coordination complex containing ligands, at least one, most preferably at least
3, and optimally at least 4 of which are more electronegative than halide, with any
remaining ligand or ligands being a halide ligand. When the metal ion is itself highly
electronegative, such Os⁺³, only a single strongly electronegative ligand, such as
carbonyl, for example, is required to satisfy LUMO requirements. If the metal ion
is itself of relatively low electronegativity, such as Fe⁺, choosing all of the ligands
to be highly electronegative may be required to satisfy LUMO requirements. For example,
Fe(II)(CN)₆ is a specifically preferred shallow electron trapping dopant. In fact,
coordination complexes containing 6 cyano ligands in general represent a convenient,
preferred class of shallow electron trapping dopants.
[0046] Since Ga⁺³ and In⁺³ are capable of satisfying HOMO and LUMO requirements as bare
metal ions, when they are incorporated in coordination complexes they can contain
ligands that range in electronegativity from halide ions to any of the more electronegative
ligands useful with Group VIII metal ion coordination complexes.
[0047] For Group VIII metal ions and ligands of intermediate levels of electronegativity
it can be readily determined whether a particular metal coordination complex contains
the proper combination of metal and ligand electronegativity to satisfy LUMO requirements
and hence act as a shallow electron trap. This can be done by employing electron paramagnetic
resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. This analytical technique is widely used as an analytical
method and is described in
Electron Spin Resonance: A Comprehensive Treatise on Experi-mental Techniques, 2nd Ed., by Charles P. Poole, Jr. (1983) published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New
York.
[0048] Photoelectrons in shallow electron traps give rise to an EPR signal very similar
to that observed for photoelectrons in the conduction band energy levels of the silver
halide crystal lattice. EPR signals from either shallow trapped electrons or conduction
band electrons are referred to as electron EPR signals. Electron EPR signals are commonly
characterized by a parameter called the g factor. The method for calculating the g
factor of an EPR signal is given by C. P. Poole, cited above. The g factor of the
electron EPR signal in the silver halide crystal lattice depends on the type of halide
ion(s) in the vicinity of the electron. Thus, as reported by R. S. Eachus, M. T. Olm,
R. Janes and M. C. R. Symons in the journal
Physica Status Solidi(b), Vol. 152 (1989), pp. 583-592, in a AgCl crystal the g factor of the electron EPR
signal is 1.88 ± 0.001 and in AgBr it is 1.49 ± 0.02.
[0049] A coordination complex dopant can be identified as useful in forming shallow electron
traps in the practice of the invention if, in the test emulsion set out below, it
enhances the magnitude of the electron EPR signal by at least 20 percent compared
to the corresponding undoped control emulsion. The undoped control emulsion is a 0.45
± 0.05 µm edge length AgBr octahedral emulsion precipitated, but not subsequently
sensitized, as described for Control 1A of Marchetti et al U.S. Patent 4,937,180.
The test emulsion is identically prepared, except that the metal coordination complex
in the concentration intended to be used in the emulsion of the invention is substituted
for Os(CN₆)⁴⁻ in Example 1B of Marchetti et al.
[0050] After precipitation, the test and control emulsions are each prepared for electron
EPR signal measurement by first centrifuging the liquid emulsion, removing the supernatant,
replacing the supernatant with an equivalent amount of warm distilled water and resuspending
the emulsion. This procedure is repeated three times, and, after the final centrifuge
step, the resulting powder is air dried. These procedures are performed under safe
light conditions.
[0051] The EPR test is run by cooling three different samples of each emulsion to 20, 40
and 60°K, respectively, exposing each sample to the filtered output of a 200 W Hg
lamp at a wavelength of 365 nm, and measuring the EPR electron signal during exposure.
If, at any of the selected observation temperatures, the intensity of the electron
EPR signal is significantly enhanced (i.e., measurably increased above signal noise)
in the doped test emulsion sample relative to the undoped control emulsion, the dopant
is a shallow electron trap.
[0052] As a specific example of a test conducted as described above, when a commonly used
shallow electron trapping dopant, Fe(CN)₆⁴⁻, was added during precipitation at a molar
concentration of 50 x 10⁻⁶ dopant per silver mole as described above, the electron
EPR signal intensity was enhanced by a factor of 8 over undoped control emulsion when
examined at 20°K.
[0053] Hexacoordination complexes are preferred coordination complexes for use in the practice
of this invention. They contain a metal ion and six ligands that displace a silver
ion and six adjacent halide ions in the crystal lattice. One or two of the coordination
sites can be occupied by neutral ligands, such as carbonyl, aquo or ammine ligands,
but the remainder of the ligands must be anionic to facilitate efficient incorporation
of the coordination complex in the crystal lattice structure. Illustrations of specifically
contemplated hexacoordination complexes for inclusion in the protrusions are provided
by McDugle et al U.S. Patent 5,037,732, Marchetti et al U.S. Patents 4,937,180, 5,264,336
and 5,268,264, Keevert et al U.S Patent 4,945,035 and Murakami et al Japanese Patent
Application Hei-2[1990]-249588. Useful neutral and anionic organic ligands for hexacoordination
complexes are disclosed by Olm et al U.S. Patent 5,360,712. Careful scientific investigations
have revealed Group VIII hexahalo coordination complexes to create deep (desensitizing)
electron traps, as illustrated R. S. Eachus, R. E. Graves and M. T. Olm
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 69, pp. 4580-7 (1978) and
Physica Status Solidi A, Vol. 57, 429-37 (1980).
[0054] In a specific, preferred form it is contemplated to employ as a dopant a hexacoordination
complex satisfying the formula:
(IV) [ML₆]
n
where
M is filled frontier orbital polyvalent metal ion, preferably Fe⁺, Ru⁺, Os⁺, Co⁺³,
Rh⁺³, Ir⁺³, Pd⁺⁴ or Pt⁺⁴;
L₆ represents six coordination complex ligands which can be independently selected,
provided that least four of the ligands are anionic ligands and at least one (preferably
at least 3 and optimally at least 4) of the ligands is more electronegative than any
halide ligand; and
n is -2, -3 or -4.
[0055] The following are specific illustrations of dopants capable of providing shallow
electron traps:
- SET-1
- [Fe(CN)₆]⁻⁴
- SET-2
- [Ru(CN)₆]⁻⁴
- SET-3
- [Os(CN)₆]⁻⁴
- SET-4
- [Rh(CN)₆]⁻³
- SET-5
- [Ir(CN)₆]⁻³
- SET-6
- [Fe(pyrazine) (CN)₅]⁻⁴
- SET-7
- [RuCl(CN)₅]⁻⁴
- SET-8
- [OsBr(CN)₅]⁻⁴
- SET-9
- [RhF(CN)₅]⁻³
- SET-10
- [IrBr(CN)₅]⁻³
- SET-11
- [FeCO(CN)₅]⁻³
- SET-12
- [RuF₂(CN)₄]⁻⁴
- SET-13
- [OsCl₂(CN)₄]⁻⁴
- SET-14
- [RhI₂(CN)₄]⁻³
- SET-15
- [IrBr₂(CN)₄]⁻³
- SET-16
- [Ru(CN)₅(OCN)]⁻⁴
- SET-17
- [Ru(CN)₅(N₃)]⁻⁴
- SET-18
- [Os(CN)₅(SCN)]⁻⁴
- SET-19
- [Rh(CN)₅(SeCN)]⁻³
- SET-20
- [Ir(CN)₅(HOH)]⁻
- SET-21
- [Fe(CN)₃Cl₃]⁻³
- SET-22
- [Ru(CO)₂(CN)₄]⁻¹
- SET-23
- [Os(CN)Cl₅]⁻⁴
- SET-24
- [Co(CN)₆]⁻³
- SET-25
- [IrCl₄(oxalate)]⁻⁴
- SET-26
- [In(NCS)₆]⁻³
- SET-27
- [Ga(NCS)₆]⁻³
[0056] It is additionally contemplated to employ oligomeric coordination complexes to increase
speed, as taught by Evans et al U.S. Patent 5,024,931.
[0057] The dopants are effective in conventional concentrations, where concentrations are
based on the total silver, including both the silver in the tabular grains and the
silver in the protrusions. Generally shallow electron trap forming dopants are contemplated
to be incorporated in concentrations of at least 1 X 10⁻⁶ mole per silver mole up
to their solubility limit, typically up to about 5 X 10⁻⁴ mole per silver mole. Preferred
concentrations are in the range of from about 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁴ mole per silver mole. It
is, of course, possible to distribute the dopant so that a portion of it is incorporated
in the tabular grains and the remainder is incorporated in the silver halide protrusions;
however, this is not preferred. The advantages of placing the dopant in the silver
halide protrusions are (1) the risk of dopant contributing to thickening of the tabular
grains is eliminated and (2) by locating the dopant in the protrusions it is placed
near the site of latent image formation, which generally occurs at or near the junction
of the protrusions with the tabular grains. Locating the dopant near the site of latent
image formation increases the effectiveness of the dopant.
[0058] Silver halide epitaxy can by itself increase photographic speeds to levels comparable
to those produced by substantially optimum chemical sensitization with sulfur and/or
gold. Additional increases in photographic speed can be realized when the tabular
grains with the silver halide epitaxy deposited thereon are additionally chemically
sensitized with conventional middle chalcogen (i.e., sulfur, selenium or tellurium)
sensitizers or noble metal (e.g., gold) sensitizers. A general summary of these conventional
approaches to chemical sensitization that can be applied to silver halide epitaxy
sensitizations are contained in
Research Disclosure Dec. 1989, Item 308119, Section III. Chemical sensitization. Kofron et al illustrates
the application of these sensitizations to tabular grain emulsions.
[0059] A specifically preferred approach to silver halide epitaxy sensitization employs
a combination of sulfur containing ripening agents in combination with middle chalcogen
(typically sulfur) and noble metal (typically gold) chemical sensitizers. Contemplated
sulfur containing ripening agents include thioethers, such as the thioethers illustrated
by McBride U.S. Patent 3,271,157, Jones U.S. Patent 3,574,628 and Rosencrants et al
U.S. Patent 3,737,313. Preferred sulfur containing ripening agents are thiocyanates,
illustrated by Nietz et al U.S. Patent 2,222,264, Lowe et al U.S. Patent 2,448,534
and Illingsworth U.S. Patent 3,320,069. A preferred class of middle chalcogen sensitizers
are tetra-substituted middle chalcogen ureas of the type disclosed by Herz et al U.S.
Patents 4,749,646 and 4,810,626. Preferred compounds include those represented by
the formula:

wherein
X is sulfur, selenium or tellurium;
each of R₁, R₂, R₃ and R₄ can independently represent an alkylene, cycloalkylene,
alkarylene, aralkylene or heterocyclic arylene group or, taken together with the nitrogen
atom to which they are attached, R₁ and R₂ or R₃ and R₄ complete a 5 to 7 member heterocyclic
ring; and
each of A₁, A₂, A₃ and A₄ can independently represent hydrogen or a radical comprising
an acidic group,
with the proviso that at least one A₁R₁ to A₄R₄ contains an acidic group bonded
to the urea nitrogen through a carbon chain containing from 1 to 6 carbon atoms.
[0060] X is preferably sulfur and A₁R₁ to A₄R₄ are preferably methyl or carboxymethyl, where
the carboxy group can be in the acid or salt form. A specifically preferred tetra-substituted
thiourea sensitizer is 1,3-dicarboxymethyl-1,3-dimethylthiourea.
[0061] Preferred gold sensitizers are the gold(I) compounds disclosed by Deaton U.S. Patent
5,049,485. These compounds include those represented by the formula:
(VI) AuL₂⁺X⁻ or AuL(L¹)⁺X⁻
wherein
L is a mesoionic compound;
X is an anion; and
L¹ is a Lewis acid donor.
[0062] Kofron et al discloses advantages for "dye in the finish" sensitizations, which are
those that introduce the spectral sensitizing dye into the emulsion prior to the heating
step (finish) that results in chemical sensitization. Dye in the finish sensitizations
are particularly advantageous in the practice of the present invention where spectral
sensitizing dye is adsorbed to the surfaces of the tabular grains to act as a site
director for silver halide epitaxial deposition. Maskasky I teaches the use of J-aggregating
spectral sensitizing dyes, particularly green and red absorbing cyanine dyes, as site
directors. These dyes are present in the emulsion prior to the chemical sensitizing
finishing step. When the spectral sensitizing dye present in the finish is not relied
upon as a site director for the silver halide epitaxy, a much broader range of spectral
sensitizing dyes are available. The spectral sensitizing dyes disclosed by Kofron
et al, particularly the blue spectral sensitizing dyes shown by structure and their
longer methine chain analogous that exhibit absorption maxima in the green and red
portions of the spectrum, are particularly preferred for incorporation in the tabular
grain emulsions of the invention. The selection of J-aggregating blue absorbing spectral
sensitizing dyes for use as site directors is specifically contemplated. A general
summary of useful spectral sensitizing dyes is provided by
Research Disclosure, Dec. 1989, Item 308119, Section IV. Spectral sensitization and desensitization,
A. Spectral sensitizing dyes.
[0063] While in specifically preferred forms of the invention the spectral sensitizing dye
can act also as a site director and/or can be present during the finish, the only
required function that a spectral sensitizing dye must perform in the emulsions of
the invention is to increase the sensitivity of the emulsion to at least one region
of the spectrum. Hence, the spectral sensitizing dye can, if desired, be added to
an tabular grain according to the invention after chemical sensitization has been
completed.
[0064] Aside from the features of spectral sensitized, silver halide epitaxy sensitized
tabular grain emulsions described above, the emulsions of this invention and their
preparation can take any desired conventional form. For example, in accordance with
conventional practice, after a novel emulsion satisfying the requirements of the invention
has been prepared, it can be blended with one or more other novel emulsions according
to this invention or with any other conventional emulsion. Conventional emulsion blending
is illustrated in
Research Disclosure, Item 36544, Section I, E. Blends, layers and performance categories.
[0065] The emulsions once formed can be further prepared for photographic use by any convenient
conventional technique. Additional conventional features are illustrated by
Research Disclosure Item 36544, cited above, Section II, Vehicles, vehicle extenders, vehicle-like addenda
and vehicle related addenda; Section III, Emulsion washing; Section V, Spectral sensitization
and desensitization; Section VI, UV dyes/optical brighteners/luminescent dyes; Section
VII, Antifoggants and stabilizers; Section VIII, Absorbing and scattering materials;
Section IX, Coating physical property modifying addenda; Section X, Dye image formers
and modifiers. The features of Sections VI, VIII, IX and X can alternatively be provided
in other photographic element layers. Other features which relate to photographic
element construction are found in Section XI, Layers and layer arrangements; XII,
Features applicable only to color negative; XIII, Features applicable only to color
reversal; XIV, Scan facilitating features; and XV, Supports.
[0066] The novel epitaxial silver halide sensitized tabular grain emulsions of this invention
can be employed in any otherwise conventional photographic element. The emulsions
can, for example, be included in a photographic element with one or more silver halide
emulsion layers. In one specific application a novel emulsion according to the invention
can be present in a single emulsion layer of a photographic element intended to form
either silver or dye photographic images for viewing or scanning.
[0067] In one simple form the photographic elements can be black-and-white (e.g., silver
image forming) photographic elements in which the underlying (first) emulsion layer
is orthochromatically or panchromatically sensitized.
[0068] In an alternative form the photographic elements can be multicolor photographic elements
containing blue recording (yellow dye image forming), green recording (magenta dye
image forming) and red recording (cyan dye image forming) layer units in any coating
sequence. A wide variety of coating arrangements are disclosed by Kofron et al, cited
above, columns 56-58.
Examples
[0069] The invention can be better appreciated by reference to following specific examples
of emulsion preparations, emulsions and photographic elements satisfying the requirements
of the invention. Photographic speeds are reported as relative log speeds, where a
speed difference of 30 log units equals a speed difference of 0.3 log E, where E represents
exposure in lux-seconds. Contrast is measured as mid-scale contrast. Halide ion concentrations
are reported as mole percent (M%), based on silver.
Emulsion A
[0070] This emulsion was precipitated in a two part process. Part 1 effected the formation
of nine moles of a Ag(Br,I) emulsion having mean diameter and thickness values of
ca. 1.9 µm and 0.047µm, respectively. A portion of this emulsion was then used as
a seed emulsion for further growth in Part 2, during which additionally precipitated
silver bromide was deposited mainly on the {111} major faces of the tabular grains--i.e.,
thickness rather than lateral growth was fostered in Part 2 of the precipitation.
Part 1
[0071] A vessel equipped with a stirrer was charged with 6 L of water containing 3.75 g
lime-processed bone gelatin, 4.12 g NaBr, an antifoamant, and sufficient sulfuric
acid to adjust pH to 1.8, at 39°C. During nucleation, which was accomplished by balanced
simultaneous, 4 second addition of AgNO₃ and halide (98.5 and 1.5 M% NaBr and KI,
respectively) solutions, both at 2.5 M, in sufficient quantity to form 0.01335 mole
of silver iodobromide, pBr and pH remained approximately at the values initially set
in the reactor solution. Following nucleation, the reactor gelatin was quickly oxidized
by addition of 128 mg of Oxone™ (2KHSO₅·KHSO₄·K₂SO₄, purchased from Aldrich) in 50
mL of water, and the temperature was raised to 54°C in 9 min. After the reactor and
its contents were held at this temperature for 9 min, 100 g of oxidized methionine
lime-processed bone gelatin dissolved in 1.5 L H₂O at 54°C were added to the reactor.
Next the pH was raised to 5.90, and 43.75 mL of 2.8 M NaBr were added to the reactor.
Twenty five minutes after nucleation the growth stage was begun during which 2.5 M
AgNO₃, 2.8 M NaBr, and a 0.108 M suspension of AgI (Lippmann) were added in proportions
to maintain (a) a uniform iodide level of 4.125 M% in the growing silver halide crystals
and (b) the reactor pBr at the value resulting from the cited NaBr additions prior
to the start of nucleation and growth, until 0.813 mole of silver iodobromide had
formed, at which time the excess Br⁻ concentration was increased by addition of 37.5
mL of 2.8 M NaBr; the reactor pBr was maintained at the resulting value for the balance
of the growth. The flow of the cited reactants was then resumed and the flow was accelerated
such that the final flow rate at the end of grwoth, which took at total of 127 minutes,
was approximately 13 times that at the beginning; a total of 9 moles of silver iodobromide
(4.125 M%I) was formed.
Part 2
[0072] Six moles of the emulsion formed in Step 1 were removed, and additional growth was
carried out on the 3 moles which were retained in the reactor and which served as
seed crystals for further thickness growth. Before initiating this additional growth,
34 grams of oxidized, lime-processed bone gelatin, dissolved in 500 mL water at 54°C,
were added and the reactor pBr was adjusted to ca. 2.05 by slow addition of AgNO₃.
Next, growth was begun using double jet addition of 3.0 M AgNO₃ and 5.0 M NaBr with
relative rates such that the reactor pBr was further adjusted to 3.3 over the next
10 min. While maintaining this high pBr value and a temperature of 54°C, growth was
continued by adding the cited AgNO₃ and NaBr solutions until an additional 9.0 moles
of silver bromide was deposited onto the host grains; flow rates were accelerated
1.85x during the 162 min growth of Part 2.
[0073] The final overall composition of the resulting silver iodobromide tabular grain emulsion
was ca. 98.97 M% Br and 1.03 M% I. When growth was completed, pBr was lowered to ca.
2, and the emulsion was coagulation washed. After washing, pH and pBr were adjusted
to 6.0 and 3.1, respectively, prior to storage.
[0074] The resulting emulsion was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mean
grain area was determined from the resulting grain pictures using a
Summagraphics SummaSketch Plus sizing tablet that was interfaced to an
IBM Personal Computer: More than 98% of total grain projected area were provided by tabular
crystals. The mean ECD of the emulsion grains was 1.37 µm (coefficient of variation
= 43). During Part 2 the mean ECD of the tabular grain emulsion was actually reduced
from its value at the end of Part 1. Assuming a constant number of particles, this
indicated that negative lateral growth occurred, suggesting that ripening had occurred
at the edges of the tabular grains and that deposition of silver halide had occurred
primarily on the {111} major faces of the tabular grains. Since the grain population
of the final emulsion consisted almost exclusively of tabular grains, the grain thickness
was determined using a dye adsorption technique: The level of 1,1'-diethyl-2,2'-cyanine
dye required for saturation coverage was determined, and the equation for surface
area was solved assuming the solution extinction coefficient of this dye to be 77,300
L/mole cm and its site area per molecule to be 0.566 nm. This approach gave a mean
grain thickness of 0.175 µm.
Epitaxial Sensitizations
[0075] Samples of the emulsions were next sensitized with and without silver salt epitaxy
being present.
Control
[0076] A 0.5 mole sample of Emulsion A was melted at 40°C and its pBr was adjusted to ca.
4 with a simultaneous addition of AgNO₃ and KI solutions in a ratio such that the
small amount of silver halide precipitated during this adjustment was 12% I. Next,
2 M% NaCl (based on the original amount of silver iodobromide host) was added, followed
by addition of spectral sensitizers Dye 1 [anhydro-9-ethyl-5',6'-dimethyoxy-5-phenyl-3'-(3-sulfopropyl)-3-(3-sulfobutyl)oxathiacarbocyanine
hydroxide] and Dye 2 [anhydro-5,5'-dichloro-9-ethyl-3,3'-bis(3-sulfopropyl)thiacarbocyanine
hydroxide, sodium salt], after which epitaxy was formed by sequential additions CaCl₂,
NaBr, AgI and AgNO₃. This procedure produced epitaxial growths mainly on the corners
and edges of the host tabular grains. The epitaxy amounted to 6 M% of the silver in
the starting tabular grain emulsion. The nominal composition of the tabular grain
host--that is, the halide added to form the host grains, and the actual composition
of the host grains are set out in Table I. The nominal composition of the epitaxy
and the actual composition of the epitaxy are set out in Table II.
[0077] Analytical electron microscopy (AEM) techniques were employed to determine the actual
as opposed to nominal (input) compositions of the silver halide epitaxial protrusions.
The general procedure for AEM is described by J. I. Goldstein and D. B. Williams,
"X-ray Analysis in the TEM/STEM",
Scanning Electron Microscopy/1977; Vol. 1, IIT Research Institute, March 1977, p. 651. The composition of an individual
epitaxial protrusion was determined by focusing an electron beam to a size small enough
to irradiate only the protrusion being examined. The selective location of the epitaxial
protrusions at the corners of the host tabular grains facilitated addressing only
the epitaxial protrusions. Each corner epitaxial protrusion on each of 25 grains was
examined for each of the sensitizations. The results are summarized in Table I.
Table I
| Halide in Tabular Grains |
| Sample |
Halide Added |
Halide Found (Std. Dev.) |
| |
|
Cl |
Br |
I |
| Cont. |
Br 99% |
4.6% |
93.9% |
1.5% |
| |
I 1% |
(0.4) |
(0.6) |
(0.2) |
Table II
| Halide in Epitaxy |
| Sample |
Halide Added |
Halide Found (Std. Dev.) |
| |
|
Cl |
Br |
I |
| |
Cl 42% |
|
|
|
| Cont. |
Br 42% |
39.8% |
54.6% |
5.6% |
| |
I 16% |
(9.9) |
(9.1) |
(1.6) |
[0078] The minimum AEM detection limit was a halide concentration of 0.5 M %.
Example 1
[0079] The preparation procedure employed in preparing the Control was repeated, except
that K₄Ru(CN)₆ in the amount of 4 X 10⁻⁵ mole per mole Ag forming the host grains
was introduced during formation of epitaxy as a separate aqueous solution, added between
NaBr and AgI additions.
Post-Epitaxy Preparation
[0080] The epitaxially sensitized emulsions were each divided into smaller portions to determine
optimal levels of subsequently added sensitizing components and to test effects of
level variations. To these portions were added additional portions of Dyes 1 and 2,
60 mg NaSCN/mole Ag, sulfur Sensitizer 1, gold Sensitizer 2, and 11.44 mg 1-(3-acetamidophenyl)-5-mercaptotetrazole
(APMT)/mole Ag. After all components were added the mixture was heated to 50°C to
complete the sensitization, and after cool-down, 114.4 mg additional APMT was added.

[0081] Based on photographic element constructions and sensitometric evaluations identical
to those reported below using portions of the emulsions, the optimum levels of Dyes
1 and 2 in each of the Control and Example 1 emulsions were determined to be 87.7
and 358.7 mg/mole Ag, respectively. Optimum levels of Sensitizers 1 and 2 in mg/mole
Ag were determined to be 2.7 and 0.8 (Control) and 3.1 and 0.95 (Example 1), respectively.
[0082] The resulting optimally sensitized emulsions were coated on a cellulose acetate film
support over a gray silver antihalation layer, and the emulsion layer was overcoated
with a 4.3 g/m gelatin layer containing surfactant and 1.75 percent by weight, based
on total weight of gelatin, of bis(vinylsulfonyl)methane hardener. Emulsion laydown
was 0.646 g Ag/m and this layer also contained 0.323 g/m and 0.019 g/m of Couplers
1 and 2, respectively, 10.4 mg/m of 4-hydroxy-6-methyl-1,3,3a,7-tetraazaindene (Na⁺
salt), and 14.4 mg/m 2-(2-octadecyl)-5-sulfohydroquinone (Na⁺ salt), surfactant and
a total of 1.08 g gelatin/m.

Sensitometry
[0083] The emulsions so coated were given 0.01 sec Wratten 23A ™ filtered (wavelengths >560
nm transmitted) daylight balanced light exposures through a calibrated neutral step
tablet, and then were developed using the color negative Kodak Flexicolor™ C41 process.
Speed was measured at a density of 0.15 above minimum density.
[0084] Granularity measurements were made according to the procedures described in the
SPSE Handbook of Photo- graphic Science and Engineering, W. Thomas, Ed., pp. 934-939. The granularity readings at each step were divided by
the gamma (Δ D ÷ Δlog E, where D = density and E = exposure in lux-seconds) at each
step and plotted vs. log E. In these plots there is typically a minimum. The minimum
of this gamma-normalized granularity allows a comparison of coatings having differing
contrast. Lower values indicate lower granularity. Granularity readings reported were
averages of observations from four adjacent exposure steps near the speed point and
extending to higher exposure levels. These four readings were typically near the minimum
granularity.
[0085] The contrast normalized granularities obtained as described above are reported in
Table III below in grain units (g.u.), in which each g.u. represents a 5 percent change;
positive and negative changes correspond to grainier and less grainy images, respectively.
In other words, negative differences in granularity, indicate granularity reductions.
[0086] The results are summarized in Table III.
Table III
| Sample |
Dmin |
Relative Log Speed |
Midscale Contrast |
Δ Normalized Granularity (g.u.) |
| Cont. |
0.14 |
100 |
0.58 |
Check |
| Ex. 1 |
0.15 |
109 |
0.55 |
0.6 |
[0087] From Table III it is apparent that adding a shallow electron trapping site providing
dopant in the epitaxy increased photographic speed without a corresponding increase
in granularity. Applying the generally accepted standard that each increase of 30
speed units costs an increase of 7 g.u., it is noted that the Example 1 emulsion exhibited
a speed advantage over the control of 9 speed units with only a 0.6 g.u. increase,
rather than the 2.1 g.u. increase that would have been predicted. Thus, the presence
of the shallow electron trapping site providing dopant offered a significant improvement
in performance.