(19)
(11) EP 0 706 582 B9

(12) CORRECTED EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION
Note: Bibliography reflects the latest situation

(15) Correction information:
Corrected version no 1 (W1 B1)
Corrections, see

(48) Corrigendum issued on:
03.11.2004 Bulletin 2004/45

(45) Date of publication and mentionof the opposition decision:
17.03.2004 Bulletin 2004/12

(45) Mention of the grant of the patent:
02.05.2001 Bulletin 2001/18

(21) Application number: 94918171.3

(22) Date of filing: 25.05.1994
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC)7C23F 1/00, H01L 21/306, C09G 1/02
(86) International application number:
PCT/US1994/006091
(87) International publication number:
WO 1994/028194 (08.12.1994 Gazette 1994/27)

(54)

IMPROVED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR POLISHING

ZUSAMMENSETZUNG UND VERFAHREN ZUM POLIEREN

COMPOSITIONS ET PROCEDES DE POLISSAGE AMELIORES


(84) Designated Contracting States:
AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

(30) Priority: 26.05.1993 US 67234

(43) Date of publication of application:
17.04.1996 Bulletin 1996/16

(73) Proprietor: RODEL, INC.
Newark Delaware 19713 (US)

(72) Inventors:
  • BRANCALEONI, Gregory
    Newark, DE 19702 (US)
  • COOK, Lee Melbourne
    Steelville, PA 19310 (US)

(74) Representative: Petersen, Frank, Dipl.-Ing. 
Lemcke, Brommer & Partner Patentanwälte Bismarckstrasse 16
76133 Karlsruhe
76133 Karlsruhe (DE)


(56) References cited: : 
WO-A-94/04314
US-A- 3 385 682
US-A- 4 238 275
US-A- 4 448 634
US-A- 4 968 381
US-A- 5 244 534
JP-A- 3 256 665
US-A- 4 117 093
US-A- 4 332 649
US-A- 4 867 757
US-A- 5 051 134
US-I4- T 105 402
   
  • CHEMIC-INGENIEUR-TECHNIK; HEIMANN, "Carbon Trapped in Thin Oxide Films Produced During Polishing of Semiconductor Silicon in the System HF/HNO 3/Carboxylic Acid...."; Vol. 59, No. 5, 1987, p.p. 427-429.
  • RODEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Rodel, SURFACE TECH REVIEW; (Vol. 1): issue 5; October 1998, p.p. 1-4.
  • 1991 VMIC Conference, IEEE, C.W. KAANTA et al; "Dual Damascene: A ULSI Wiring Technology", 11-12 June 1991, pp. 144-152.
  • Morisawa et al., Hyomen Gijutsu, 44(2), 1104-1107 (1993)
   
Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).


Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION


Technical Field



[0001] The invention relates to the polishing of glasses, semiconductors, dielectric/metal composites and integrated circuits. More particularly, this invention relates to improvements in the surface preparation of composite materials where improved differences in rate between silica and other components are desired.

Background Art



[0002] Conventional polishing compositions or slurries generally consist of a solution which contains abrasive particles. The part, or substrate is bathed or rinsed in the slurry while an elastomeric pad is pressed against the substrate and rotated so that the slurry particles are pressed against the substrate under load. The lateral motion of the pad causes the slurry particles to move across the substrate surface, resulting in wear, volumetric removal of the substrate surface.

[0003] In many cases the rate of surface removal is determined solely by the degree of applied pressure, the velocity of pad rotation and the chemical activity of the slurry particle. Thus, slurry particles with a high degree of chemical activity toward the substrate (e.g., CeO2 toward SiO2) show significantly higher polishing rates than more inert particles (e.g. La2O3 toward SiO2). This enhancement of chemical activity of the polishing particle has been the basis of numerous patents, for example U.S.Patent No. 4,959,113.

[0004] An alternative means of increasing polishing rates is to add components to the slurries which by themselves are corrosive to the substrate. When used together with abrasive particles, substantially higher polishing rates may be achieved. This process, often termed chemo-mechanical polishing (CMP) is a preferred technique for polishing of semiconductors and semiconductor devices, particularly integrated circuits. Examples of such CMP processes for enhanced polishing of silicon wafer surfaces have been disclosed by Payne in U.S.Patent No. 4,169,337. Beyer et al. (U.S.Patent No. 4,944,836) and Chow et al. (U.S.Patent No. 4,702,792) teach the utility of CMP in improving rate selectivity in the polishing of dielectric/metal composite structures such as interconnect vias in integrated circuit structures. Specifically they teach the introduction of additives which accelerate dissolution of the metal component. The purpose of this and other related techniques is to preferentially remove the metal portion of the circuit so that the resulting surface becomes coplanar. The process is ordinarily termed planarization.

[0005] It is highly desirable to improve the selectivity of metal planarization as much as possible. Carr et al. (U.S. Patent No. 4,954,142) teach further improvements in CMP planarization of dielectric/metal composite structures by addition of a chelating agent to the slurry which is selective for the metal component of interest. This results in a further increase of the corrosion rate of the metal phase and increase selectivity of metal versus dielectric phase removal, making the planarization process much more efficient.

[0006] A number of anions have been demonstrated to chelate or complex with Si4+ in such a manner as to accelerate corrosion of silica or silicate materials. As described by Bacon and Raggon [J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. vol. 42, pp.199-205, 1959] a variety of weak acids were shown to accelerate the corrosion of silica and silicate glasses in neutral solution (pH∼7). The effect was ascribed to the ability of the free anions of the acid (conjugate base) to complex the Si4+ cation in much the same manner as the pyrocatechol-silicate complexes described by Rosenheim et al. (A. Rosenheim, B. Raibmann, G. Schendel; Z. anorg. u. allgem. Chem., vol. 196, pp. 160-76, 1931] as shown below:



[0007] The corrosive anions described by Bacon and Raggon all had similar structures which were in turn closely similar to pyrocatechol (1,2-dihydroxybenzene), namely, all were mono or dicarboxylic acids which had hydroxyl groups at secondary or tertiary carbon sites which were located at an alpha position with respect to the carboxylic acid group. An example of an active versus an inactive compound is shown below:
   HOOC-CHOH-CHOH-COOH: Tartaric acid (active) pKa1=3.02 versus
   HOOC-CH2-CH2-COOH: Succinic acid (inactive) pKa1=4.2 The pKa is the logarithm of the association constant Ka for formation of the free anion, as defined by the reaction:





[0008] Thus a lower pKa indicates a stonger acid. At equivalent pH a higher conjugate base concentration is found in solution.

[0009] Prior art corrosion literature also describes the corrosive effects of catechol in static solution. As shown by Emsberger (J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., vol. 42, pp.373-5, 1959), addition of pyrocatechol to Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA) solution produces enhanced corrosion of soda-lime-silicate glass in the pH range 10-14. The enhancement was significant with rates at least twice as high as with EDTA alone in the solution. A maximum effect was found at pH 12.5. Once again, the effect was attributed to complexation of free Si4+ cation with the catechol.

[0010] From the above, It is clear that published literature on the subject indicates that such additives have been shown to be corrosive to silica or silicates under static exposure. The mode of the corrosion is believed to be the formation of a complex or chelate with free Si4+ cations. Thus, in like manner to the teaching of U.S.Patent No. 4,954,142, a higher silica removal rate during polishing would be expected when such additives are present in the polishing solution. Consequently, these types of additives have never been used in metal planarization, as metal/silica selectivity was expected to be seriously degraded.

[0011] While the prior art CMP procedures described above appear attractive, they possess significant drawbacks. Specifically, the etchants incorporated into prior art CMP slurries are isotropic, i.e., they attack all portions of the exposed phase, regardless of position. Thus significant incorporation of etchants into CMP slurries often results in increases in surface roughness and texture when recessed features become etched. In the polishing of integrated circuits this effect is termed dishing and often occurs at the end of the process when a significant portion of the substrate surface is composed of the more durable component. It is highly undesirable, as the object of polishing is to produce a uniform plane surface free from texture.

[0012] It is clear from the above discussion that if the polishing rate of the silica phase of a composite structure could be reduced in a controlled manner, selectivity could be significantly improved. This would allow use of solutions which are less aggressive to the other (metal) phase, thus permitting efficient CMP processing of metal/silica composites with reduced dishing.

[0013] Accordingly, it is the object of this invention to provide a solution for polishing silicon, silica, sllicon- or silica-containing articles wherein the polishing rate of the silicon or silica phase is modulated or controlled by the addition of specific additive or complexing agents.

[0014] It is also the object of this invention to provide an improved polishing slurry and polishing method for composite articles which results in improved selectivity during the polishing process, particularly for metal dielectric composites such as those occurring in integrated circuit structures.

[0015] These and other objects of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art after referring to the following description and examples.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION



[0016] The object of this invention has been achieved by providing a use of a composition for polishing silicon, silica or silicon-containing articles, including a composite of metal and silica, according to the features of the enclosed claim 1.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION



[0017] In the present invention we have discovered the unexpected ability of a class of compounds to suppress the polishing rate of objects whose surfaces are composed of silicon and silicates. incorporation of these compounds into a polishing slurry allows control of the polishing rate of said surfaces, thus allowing unprecedented levels of selectivity when said surface is a component of a composite article, e.g., a dielectric/metal composite. What is even more unexpected is that the prior art teaches that these same compounds act as accelerants to the corrosion of silica and silicate surfaces under static conditions.

[0018] As discussed above, the rate-suppressing compounds in question are those which dissociate in solution to produce free anions of a specific class, said anions are believed to complex or bond to the silicon, silica or silicate surface via interaction with surface hydroxyl groups (Si-OH).

[0019] Unexpectedly, we have discovered that the opposite is true; the introduction of this class of anions in to the polishing composition actually presses t removal of silica during the polishing process. This suppression effect is clearly demonstrated in the examples set forth below.

[0020] More specifically, we observe that said anions of the rate suppressing compounds must have two characteristics simultaneously in order to suppress the SiO2 polishing rate. First, they must have at least two acid groups present in the structure which can effect complexation to the silica or silicate surface, and, second, the pKa of the first dissociable acid must not be substantially larger than the pH of the polishing composition for efficient silica rate suppression to occur. Substantially is herein defined as 0.5 units (pKa or pH).

[0021] Acid species are defined as those functional groups having a dissociable proton. These include, but are not limited to, carboxylate, hydroxyl, sulfonic and phosphonic groups. Carboxylate and hydroxyl groups are preferred as these are present in the widest variety of effective species.

[0022] The pKa of the first dissociable acid is strongly influenced by structure. It is our finding that a wide variety of structures are effective, as long as the two necessary conditions set forth above are met. Particularly effective are structures which possess two or more carboxylate groups with hydroxyl groups in an alpha position, such as straight chain mono- and di-carboxylic acids and salts including, for example, malic acid and malates, tartaric acid and tartrates and gluconic acid and gluconates. Also effective are tri- and polycarboxylic acids and salts with secondary or tertiary hydroxyl groups in an alpha position relative to a carboxylate group such as citric acid and citrates. Also effective are compounds containing a benzene ring such as ortho di- and poly-hydroxybenzoic acids and acid salts, phthalic acid and acid salts, pyrocatechol, pyrogallol, gallic acid and gallates and tannic acid and tannates. The reason for the effectiveness of these compounds lies in the extensive electron delocalization observed in the structures. This delocalization leads to a high degree of stability for the conjugate base in solution, as evidenced by the low pKa values:

Gallic acid: pKa1=4.4

Malic acid: pKa1=3.4

Tartaric acid: pKa1=3.02

Citric acid: pKa1=3.1

Phthalic acid: pKa1=2.95



[0023] The pKa limitations set forth in the present invention are due to the requirement that the free anion or conjugate base must be present in reasonable concentration for the rate suppressing effect to occur. At pH<<pKa little free anion is present. At pH=pKa, the acid is 50% dissociated. At pH>>pKa, essentially all of the acid is present as the anion. Thus the dissociation constant must be chosen to reflect the range of pH values normally encountered in polishing. Ideally, the pH of the polishing composition should be equal to or greater than a value equal to the pKa1 of the additive used for silica rate suppression. If the pKa1 of the additive is substantially greater than the composition pH, insufficient free anion is produced in solution and the suppression effect does not occur. Thus additives such as tartaric, citric and phthalic acid (pKa≤3.1) should be effective over a pH range corresponding to the normal pH range encountered in polishing silicates (pH∼4-11) and would be preferred. In contrast, addition of pyrocatechol (pKa1∼10) would only be useful at very high solution pH, such as might be found in the polishing of Si wafers, and would have a more restricted utility.

[0024] Effective amounts of the compound which suppresses the rate of removal of silica are usually 0.1 molar and greater, up to the solubility of the compound in the polishing composition at the temperature of use.

[0025] The abrasive particles in the polishing compositions of this invention may be any of those commonly used for fine polishing such as SiO2, ZrO2, CeO2, Al2O3 and diamond. Typically, the amount of abrasive particles used in polishing compositions ranges from about 1% to 15% solids by weight in the polishing composition. In the examples which follow the abrasive particles used are submicron particles of alumina (Al2O3).

[0026] The oxidizing agent in the polishing compositions of this invention may be any oxidant soluble in the aqueous medium provided that the oxidation potential of the oxidizing agent is greater than the oxidation potential of the metal in the composite being polished. Common oxidizing agents are chlorates, perchlorates, chlorites, nitrates, persulfates and peroxides. In the following examples hydrogen peroxide is used as the oxidizing agent and was found to be effective for accelerating the rate of removal of tungsten. The metals normally contained in the composites for which the polishing compositions of this invention are effective are tungsten, copper and aluminum, however, any metal would fall within the scope of the invention. Oxidizing agents might be used in amounts up to 50% of the weight of the polishing composition, but most typically be in the range of 10% to 40%.

[0027] Several examples of compositions as used in the present invention are set forth below in order to demonstrate and clarify the essential features. They are not meant to be restrictive in any way.

EXAMPLE 1



[0028] Two polishing compositions were prepared as shown below. The compositions differed only in that the second composition contained 0.3 Molar potassium hydrogen phthalate as an additive introduced to suppress the polishing rate of SiO2. Both compositions were used to polish samples of CVD-deposited tungsten metal film on Si substrates, and thermally grown SiO2 on Si substrates, using identical conditions on a Strasbaugh 6DS Polishing Machine. Polishing conditions were:

Pressure: 7 psi (7 × 6895 Pa)

Spindle speed: 40 rpm

Platen speed: 50 rpm

Pad type: Rodel IC1000, 38" diam

Slurry flow: 150 ml/min

Composition 1

1000g submicron alumina slurry (33% solids)

1000g H2O

2000ml 50% H2O2

pH=5.6

Polishing rate of W metal=436 Angstroms/min

Polishing rate of SiO2=140 Angstroms/min

Selectivity (W/SiO2)=3.1:1

Composition 2

1000g submicron alumina slurry (33% solids)

1000g H2O

2000ml 50% H2O2

221.6g potassium hydrogen phthalate

pH=2.9

Polishing rate of W metal=1038 Angstroms/min

Polishing rate of SiO2=68 Angstroms/min

Selectivity (W/SiO2)=15.3:1



[0029] Addition of the phthalate salt resulted in a reduction of slurry pH to approximately the pKa1 of phthalic acid. The lowered pH led to an increase in the tungsten polishing rate. Phthalate addition resulted in a reduction of the SiO2 polishing rate by a factor of 2. This resulted in a five-fold improvement in the selectivity of removal fortungsten relative to silica, a highly desirable result. In this example, hydrogen peroxide was introduced into the composition to accelerate the removal of tungsten. The high degree of effectiveness of composition 2 at such low pH is surprising. This is in direct opposition to the teaching of U.S. Patent No. 4,956,313 and U.S.Patent No. 4,992,135, both of which teach the efficacy of using solution pH above 6 to obtain optimum selectivity for tungsten vs. silica removal. Thus composition no. 2 of this example represents a preferred embodiment of the present invention as it applies to the polishing of metal/dielectric composites.

EXAMPLE 2



[0030] To more clearly show that the rate inhibition of silica was not due to incorporation of hydrogen peroxide, the test of Example 1 was repeated without peroxide addition where an inactive salt (ammonium nitrate) was added in equinormal concentration relative to the phthalate salt. Wafers and polishing conditions were identical to those used in Example 1. As shown below, while tungsten rates were identical, silica rates were depressed by a factor of ∼2 when phthalate was added to the composition. In this example, the pH of the phthalate-containing composition is substantially above pKa1.

Composition 3

1000g submicron alumina slurry (33% solids)

3000g H2O

177g NH4NO3 (0.6 normal)

pH=7.6

Polishing rate of W metal=71 Angstroms/min

Polishing rate of SiO2=227 Angstroms/min

Composition 4

1000g submicron alumina slurry (33% solids)

3000g H2O

221.6g potassium hydrogen phthalate (0.6normal)

pH=3.6

Polishing rate of W metal=71 Angstroms/min

Polishing rate of SiO2=119 Angstroms/min


EXAMPLE 3



[0031] In order to demonstrate yet further the effect of anions of the present invention on the rate of silica polishing, varying concentrations of potassium hydrogen phthalate were added to portions of a freshly prepared lot of composition no. 1 above. Wafers and polishing conditions were again the same as in Examples 1 and 2. Test results are summarized below:
TABLE 1
Test 1 2 3 4
Moles Potassium hydrogen phthalate added 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.20
pH 6.0 3.6 3.5 3.3
W polishing rate Angstroms/min 444 978 1164 1164
SiO2 polishing rate Angstroms/min 167 137 93 76
Selectivity (W/SiO2) 2.7 7.1 12.5 15.3


[0032] Both tungsten polishing rate, silica polishing rate, and selectivity forthe composition without phthalate addition agree well with the data of Example 1. Silica polishing rate decreases directly with increasing phthalate concentration, while the rate of tungsten polishing remains relatively constant at phthalate additions above 0.05 molar. These data are also in good agreement with the data for the phthalate-containing composition no.2 of Example 1. These data clearly indicate that the effect of compositions of the present invention is to suppress the polishing rate of silica with corresponding improvements in polishing selectivity relative to a metal phase. In this example, a critical concentration of ∼0.1 molar is required for effectiveness. Additions of compounds above such a critical concentration also represent a preferred embodiment of this invention. They, of course, are only useful up to a concentration equal to their solubility in the composition at the temperature of use. For potassium hydrogen phthalate the solubility limit is about 0.5 molar at room temperature.

EXAMPLE 4



[0033] A portion of composition 2 of Example 1 above was prepared and used to polish samples of both sheet tungsten, sheet SiO2 and samples of integrated circuits. The integrated circuits consisted of a device containing interlevel connections (studs) and a silica dielectric layer covered with approximately 2000 angstroms of tungsten metal. The composition of the sheet wafers was identical to that contained in the integrated circuit. All samples were polished on a Strasbaugh Model 6DS Planarizer using conditions set forth below:

Pressure: 7 psi

Carrier speed: 25 rpm

Platen speed: 25 rpm

Pad type: IC-1000

Slurry flow: 100 ml/min



[0034] Sheet tungsten wafers showed removal rates of 900 Angstroms/min, while the rate for sheet SiO2 was 70 Angstroms/min, giving a selectivity of 12.9:1. This is close to the selectivity observed using the different machine conditions of Example 1. Polishing of the integrated circuit samples was continued until all visible traces of metal coverage had disappeared. Visual observation of metal features after polishing at 50X showed clean lines and studs. No evidence of dishing was observed. The oxide layer looked very smooth, with no evidence of scratches, pits or haze. Examination at 200X showed sharp lines and smooth metal surfaces. No damage to the oxide layer was observed. Measurement of surface topology using a Tencor P1 Wafer Profilometer indicated that the Total Indicated Runout (TIR) of wafers was between 1200 Angstroms and 4000 Angstroms over a 500 µm scan length, depending on location and feature, indicating that the circuit had been successfully planarized. TIR is the difference between maximum and minimum surface features over the scan length and is a commonly accepted measure of wafer planarity.


Claims

1. A use of a composition for polishing a composite of metal and a silicon component selected from silicon, silica and silicate, the composition comprising:

an aqueous medium,

abrasive particles,

an oxidising agent exhibiting an oxidation potential greater than the oxidation potential of the said metal; and

at least one compound having at least two acid species,

each acid species having a dissociable proton and forming anions, the anions being capable of bonding or complexing with the silicon component,

wherein the pKa of the first acid species is not larger by more than 0,5 units than the pH of the polishing composition,
the compound thereby selectively suppressing the rate of removal of the silicon component.
 
2. A use of a composition according to claim 1
wherein the compound contains a benzene ring.
 
3. A use of a composition according to claim 1
wherein the compound is selected from a straight chain mono- or di-carboxylic acid and salt which has secondary hydroxyl groups in an alpha position relative to the carboxylate group.
 
4. A use of a composition according to claim 1
wherein the compound is a poly-carboxylate.
 
5. A use of a composition according to claim 4
wherein the compound is a tri-carboxylate
 
6. A use of a composition according to claim 1
consisting essentially of water, abrasive particles, hydrogen peroxide and potassium hydrogen phthalate, where the solution concentration of the phthalate component is at least 0,1 molar.
 
7. A use of a composition according to claim 6
consisting essentially of, in parts by weight: 3,2 parts water, 0,33 parts abrasive particles, 1,5 parts hydrogen peroxide and 0,22 parts potassium hydrogen. phthalate.
 
8. A method of polishing a composite, one component of which is silicon, silica or silicate in which the polishing composition as defined in any one of claims 1 to 7 is used.
 
9. A method according to claim 8,
wherein the composite is comprised of metal and silica.
 
10. A method according to claim 9,
wherein the composite is a surface of an integrated circuit.
 


Ansprüche

1. Ein Gebrauch einer Zusammensetzung zum Polieren eines Verbundes aus Metall und einer Siliziumkomponente, ausgewählt aus Silizium, Siliziumoxid und Silikat, wobei die Zusammensetzung aufweist:

ein wässriges Medium,

abrasive Teilchen,

einen Oxidationswirkstoff, der ein Oxidationspotential aufweist, das größer ist als das Oxidationspotential des besagten Metalls, und

zumindest einen Zusatz mit zumindest zwei Säurenspezies,

wobei jede Säurespezies ein dissozierbares Proton aufweist und Anionen bildet,
wobei die Anionen fähig sind, sich mit der Siliziumkomponente zu verbinden oder einen Komplex zu bilden,
wobei der pKa der ersten Säurespezies nicht mehr als 0,5 Einheiten größer ist als der pH der Polierzusammensetzung,
wobei der Zusatz dadurch die Abtragrate der Siliziumkomponente selektiv unterdrückt.
 
2. Ein Gebrauch einer Zusammensetzung gemäß Anspruch 1,
wobei der Zusatz einen Benzolring enthält.
 
3. Ein Gebrauch einer Zusammensetzung gemäß Anspruch 1,
wobei der Zusatz ausgewählt ist aus einer geradkettigen Mono- oder Dicarbonsäure und Salz, das sekundäre Hydroxylgruppen in einer Alphaposition relativ zu der Carboxylatgruppe aufweist.
 
4. Ein Gebrauch einer Zusammensetzung gemäß Anspruch 1,
wobei der Zusatz ein Polycarboxylat ist.
 
5. Ein Gebrauch einer Zusammensetzung gemäß Anspruch 4,
wobei der Zusatz ein Tricarboxylat ist.
 
6. Ein Gebrauch einer Zusammensetzung gemäß Anspruch 1,
die im Wesentlichen besteht aus Wasser, abrasiven Teilchen, Wasserstoffperoxid und Kaliumhydrogenphthalat, in der die Lösungskonzentration der Phthalat-Komponente zumindest 0,1 molar ist.
 
7. Ein Gebrauch einer Zusammensetzung gemäß Anspruch 6,
nach Gewichtsanteilen im Wesentlichen bestehend aus: 3,2 Teilen Wasser, 0,33 Teilen abrasiven Teilchen, 1,5 Teilen Wasserstoffperoxid und 0,22 Teilen Kaliumhydrogenphthalat.
 
8. Verfahren zum Polieren eines Verbundes, dessen eine Komponente Silizium, Siliziumoxid oder Silikat ist,
in dem die Polierzusammensetzung benutzt wird, die in einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 7 definiert wird.
 
9. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 8,
wobei der Verbund aus Metall und Siliziumoxid besteht.
 
10. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 9,
wobei der Verbund eine Oberfläche eines integrierten Schaltkreises ist.
 


Revendications

1. Utilisation d'une composition pour le polissage d'un composite d'un métal et d'un composant du silicium choisis parmi le silicium, une silice et un silicate, la composition comprenant :

un milieu aqueux,

des particules abrasives,

un agent oxydant présentant un potentiel d'oxydation supérieur au potentiel d'oxydation dudit métal, et

au moins un composé présentant au moins deux espèces acides,

chaque espèce acide présentant un proton dissociable et formant des anions,

les anions étant capables de se lier ou de se complexer avec le composant du silicium, dans laquelle le pKa de la première espèce acide n'est pas supérieur de plus de 0,5 unité au pH de la composition de polissage,

le composé abaissant ainsi de façon sélective la vitesse d'enlèvement du composant du silicium.


 
2. Utilisation d'une composition selon la revendication 1,
dans laquelle le composé contient un cycle benzénique.
 
3. Utilisation d'une composition selon la revendication 1,
dans laquelle le composé est choisi parmi un acide et un sel mono- ou dicarboxylique à chaîne droite qui comporte des groupements hydroxyle secondaires en position alpha par rapport au groupement carboxylate..
 
4. Utilisation d'une composition selon la revendication 1,
dans laquelle le composé est un polycarboxylate.
 
5. Utilisation d'une composition selon la revendication 4,
dans laquelle le composé est un tricarboxylate.
 
6. Utilisation d'une composition selon la revendication 1,
constituée essentiellement d'eau, de particules abrasives, de peroxyde d'hydrogène et d'hydrogéno phtalate de potassium, dans laquelle la concentration de la solution en composant de phtalate est au moins 0,1 molaire.
 
7. Utilisation d'une composition selon la revendication 6,
constituée essentiellement, en parties en poids, de : 3,2 parties d'eau, 0,33 partie de particules abrasives, 1,5 parties de peroxyde d'hydrogène et 0,22 partie d'hydrogéno phtalate de potassium.
 
8. Procédé de polissage d'un composite, dont un composant est le silicium, une silice ou un silicate, dans lequel la composition de polissage conforme à l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7 est utilisée.
 
9. Procédé selon la revendication 8, dans lequel le composite est constitué de métal et de silice.
 
10. Procédé selon la revendication 9, dans lequel le composite est une surface d'un circuit intégré.