Field of the Invention:
[0001] This invention relates to methods whereby the efficiency of an olefin epoxidation
reaction may be enhanced. In particular, the invention pertains to an epoxidation
process wherein a titanium silicalite is utilized in the presence of hydrogen peroxide
and a low concentration of a nonbasic salt to selectively catalyze the formation of
the epoxide corresponding to the starting olefin.
Background of the Invention:
[0002] It is well known that the epoxidation of olefinic compounds with hydrogen peroxide
may be effectively catalyzed by certain synthetic zeolites containing titanium atoms
(see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,833,260). While selectivity to the desired epoxide
is generally high, U.S. Pat. No. 4,824,976 proposes that the non-selective ring-opening
reactions which take place when epoxidation is performed in a protic medium such as
water or alcohol may be suppressed by treating the catalyst prior to the reaction
or during the reaction with a suitable acid neutralizing agent. The neutralizing agent
is said to neutralize acid groups on the catalyst surface which tend to promote by-product
formation. Neutralization, according to the patent, may be accomplished with water
soluble basic substances chosen from among strong bases such as NaOH and KOH and weak
bases such as NH₄OH, Na₂CO₃, NaHCO₃, Na₂HPO₄ and analogous potassium and lithium salts
including K₂CO₃, Li₂CO₃, KHCO₃. LiHCO₃, and K₂HPO₄, alkali and/or alkaline earth salts
of carboxylic acids having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms and alkali and/or alkaline earth
alcoholates having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms.
Summary of the Invention:
[0003] We have now unexpectedly discovered that by carrying out a titanium silicalite-catalyzed
epoxidation in the presence of low concentrations of a nonbasic salt, selectivity
to epoxide may be significantly improved without detrimental effect on the rate of
hydrogen peroxide conversion. This result was surprising in view of the belief in
the art, as evidenced by U.S. Pat. No. 4,824,976, that titanium silicalite must be
treated with a basic substance or silylated in order to enhance epoxide selectivity.
Further, it had previously been reported that the presence of relatively high concentrations
of nonbasic salts such as lithium chloride and sodium nitrate during epoxidation decreases
the rate at which certain olefins are epoxidized and also adversely affects selectivity
to epoxide [(see Clerici et al.,
J. Catalysis 140, 71-83 (1993)]. Thus, the finding that such salts could be used at lower concentrations
to actually increase the yield of epoxide obtained using a titanium silicalite catalyst
could not have been predicted.
[0004] This invention provides a method of epoxidizing an olefin comprising reacting said
olefin with hydrogen peroxide in a reaction zone in the presence of a titanium silicalite
catalyst and an amount of a nonbasic salt effective to improve selectivity to epoxide.
Detailed Description of the Invention:
[0005] The hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) utilized as the oxidant in the present invention may
be obtained from any suitable source, including, for example, from autoxidation of
secondary alcohols using air or other source of molecular oxygen. Suitable secondary
alcohols include both aliphatic alcohols such as isopropanol and cyclohexanol as well
as aromatic alcohols such as alpha methyl benzyl alcohol and anthrahydroquinones (including
alkyl-substituted anthrahydroquinones). The crude reaction product thereby generated
may be either used directly in the epoxidation process of this invention or, if so
desired, purified, fractionated, concentrated, ion exchanged, or otherwise processed
prior to such use. For example, the ketone generated as an autoxidation co-product
may be separated, in whole or in part, from the hydrogen peroxide by distillation
(where the ketone is relatively volatile) or by extraction with water (where the ketone
is substantially immiscible with or insoluble in water). The hydrogen peroxide may
altematively be generated
in situ by, for example, combining oxygen, secondary alcohol, olefin, titanium silicalite
and nonbasic salt within a reaction zone under conditions effective to accomplish
simultaneous secondary alcohol autoxidation and olefin epoxidation. Generally speaking,
it will be desirable to employ initial hydrogen peroxide concentrations of from about
1 to 20 weight percent in the liquid phase within the reaction zone.
[0006] The ethylenically unsaturated substrate epoxidized in the process of this invention
is preferably an organic compound having from two to ten carbon atoms and at least
one ethylenically unsaturated functional group (i.e., a carbon-carbon double bond)
and may be a cyclic, branched or straight chain aliphatic olefin. More than one carbon-carbon
double bond may be present in the olefin; dienes, trienes, and other polyunsaturated
substrates thus may be used.
[0007] Exemplary olefins suitable for use in the process of this invention include ethylene,
propylene, the butenes, butadiene, the pentenes, isoprene, 1-hexene, 3-hexene, 1-heptene,
1-octene, diisobutylene, 1-nonene, the trimers and tetramers of propylene, cyclopentene,
cyclohexene, cycloheptene, cyclooctene, cyclooctadiene, dicyclopentadiene, methylenecyclopropane,
methylenecyclopentane, methylenecyclohexane, vinylcyclohexane, and vinyl cyclohexene.
[0008] Mixtures of olefins may be epoxidized and resulting mixture of epoxides either employed
in mixed form or separated into the different component epoxides.
[0009] The process of this invention is especially useful for the epoxidation of C₂-C₁₀
olefins having the general structure

wherein R¹, R, R³, and R⁴ are the same or different and are selected from the group
consisting of hydrogen and C₁-C₈ alkyl (selected so that the total number of carbons
in the olefin does not exceed 10).
[0010] The process of this invention is also suitable for use in epoxidizing olefins containing
functional groups other than aliphatic hydrocarbyl moieties. For example. the carbon-carbon
double bond can be substituted with groups such as -CO₂H, -CO₂R, -CN, or -OR wherein
R is an alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl or aralkyl substituent. The radicals R¹, R, R³, and
R⁴ in the structural formula shown hereinabove may contain aryl, aralkyl, halo, nitro,
sulfonic, cyano, carbonyl (e.g., ketone, aldehyde), hydroxyl, carboxyl (e.g., ester,
acid) or ether groups. Examples of olefins of these types include allyl alcohol, styrene,
allyl chloride, allyl methyl ether, allyl phenyl ether, methyl methacrylate, acrylic
acid, methyl acrylate, stilbene, and the like.
[0011] The amount of hydrogen peroxide relative to the amount of olefin is not critical,
but most suitably the molar ratio of olefin: hydrogen peroxide is from about 100:1
to 1:10 when the olefin contains one ethylenically unsaturated group. The molar ratio
of ethylenically unsaturated groups in the olefin to hydrogen peroxide is more preferably
in the range of from 1:2 to 10:1.
[0012] The titanium silicalites useful as catalysts in the epoxidation step of the process
comprise the class of zeolite substances wherein titanium is substituted for a portion
of the silicon atoms in the lattice framework of a molecular sieve. Such substances
are well-known in the art.
[0013] Particularly preferred titanium silicalites include the classes of molecular sieves
commonly referred to as "TS-1" (having an MFI topology analogous to that of the ZSM-5
aluminosilicate zeolites), "TS-2" (having an MEL topology analogous to that of the
ZSM-11 aluminosilicatezeolites), and "TS-3" (as described in Belgian Pat. No. 1,001,038).
Also suitable for use are the titanium-containing molecular sieves having framework
structures isomorphous to zeolite beta. The titanium silicalite preferably contains
no non-oxygen elements other than titanium and silica in the lattice framework, although
minor amounts of boron, iron, aluminum, and the like may be present.
[0014] Titanium silicalite catalysts suitable for use in the process of this invention will
generally have a composition corresponding to the following empirical formula xTiO₂:
(1-x)SiO₂, where x is between 0.0001 and 0.500. More preferably, the value of x is
from 0.01 to 0.125. The molar ratio of Si:Ti in the lattice framework of the titanium
silicalite is advantageously from 9.5:1 to 99:1 (most preferably, from 9.5:1 to 60:1).
The use of relatively titanium-rich silicalites may also be desirable.
[0015] The amount of catalyst employed is not critical, but should be sufficient so as to
substantially accomplish the desired epoxidation reaction in a particularly short
period of time. The optimum quantity of catalyst will depend upon a number of factors
including reaction temperature, olefin reactivity and concentration, hydrogen peroxide
concentration, type and concentration of organic solvent as well as catalyst activity
and the type of reactor or reaction system (i.e., batch vs. continuous) employed.
In a batch-type or slurry reaction, for example, the amount of catalyst will typically
be from 0.001 to 10 grams per mole of olefin. In a fixed or packed bed system, the
optimum quantity of catalyst will be influenced by the flow rate of reactants through
the fixed bed; typically, from about 0.05 to 2.0 kilograms hydrogen peroxide per kilogram
catalyst per hour will be utilized. The concentration of titanium in the liquid phase
reaction mixture will generally be from about 10 to 10,000 ppm.
[0016] The catalyst may be utilized in powder, pellet, microspheric, extruded, monolithic
or any other suitable physical form. The use of a binder (co-gel) or support in combination
with the titanium silicalite may be advantageous. Supported or bound catalysts may
be prepared by the methods known in the art to be effective for zeolite catalysts
in general. Preferably, the binder or support is essentially non-acidic and does not
catalyze the non-selective decomposition of hydrogen peroxide or ring-opening of the
epoxide.
[0017] Illustrative binders and supports include titania, silica, alumina, silica-alumina,
silicatitania, silica-thoria, silica-magnesia, silica-zironia, silica-beryllia, and
temary compositions of silica with other refractory oxides. Also useful are clays
such as montmorillonites, koalins, bentonites, halloysites, dickites, nacrites, and
ananxites. The proportion of titanium silicalite:binder or support may range from
99:1 to 1:99, but preferably is from 5:95 to 80:20.
[0018] A critical feature of the process of this invention is the presence of a nonbasic
salt. While the precise mechanism by which the improved epoxide selectivities of the
process are realized is not known, it is believed that the nonbasic salt interacts
in a favorable way with the titanium silicalite catalyst so as to suppress undesired
side reactions such as epoxide ring-opening. In one embodiment, the titanium silicalite
is pretreated (i.e., prior to epoxidation) with the nonbasic salt. One suitable pretreatment
method involves forming a slurry of the catalyst in a diluted solution of the nonbasic
salt in a suitable solvent for the salt such as water and/or alcohol and stirring
the slurry at a temperature of from 20°C to 100°C for a time effective to incorporate
sufficient nonbasic salt into the pores of the titanium silicalite. The catalyst is
thereafter separated from the slurry by suitable means such as filtration, centrifugation,
or decantation, washed if so desired, and then, optionally, dried of residual solvent.
In another pretreatment method, an as-synthesized titanium silicalite is impregnated
with a solution of the nonbasic salt and then calcined. In a preferred embodiment,
however, the nonbasic salt is introduced into the reaction zone separately from the
catalyst during epoxidation. For example, the nonbasic salt may be suitably dissolved
in the hydrogen peroxide feed, which typically will also contain a relatively polar
solvent such as water, alcohol, and/or ketone. In a continuous process, the concentration
of nonbasic salt in the feed entering the reaction zone may be periodically adjusted
as desired or necessary in order to optimize the epoxidation results attained. It
may, for example, be advantageous to use a constant salt concentration, to introduce
the salt at intermittent intervals, or to increase or decrease the salt concentration
over time.
[0019] A salt is a compound formed when the proton of an acid is replaced by a metal cation
or its equivalent (e.g., NH
4 +). Suitable salts for the purpose of this invention include those nonbasic substances
which comprise an anion and a cation preferably selected from ammonium (NH₄), alkali
metals (especially Li, Na, K), and alkaline earth metals. Preferred anions include,
but are not limited to, halide (especially Cl and Br), nitrate (NO₃), sulfate (SO₄),
and the anions of phosphorus-, arsenic-, antimony- and tin-containing acids such as
phosphate, arsenate, and stannate. Other anions such as formate, acetate, bicarbonate,
and the like may, depending upon the identity of the cation, also be used, provided
the resulting salt is nonbasic in character. Exemplary nonbasic salts suitable for
use include lithium chloride, lithium bromide, sodium chloride, sodium bromide, lithium
nitrate, sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, lithium sulfate, sodium sulfate, potassium
sulfate, lithium, magnesium, calcium, barium, and ammonium acetate (and other nonbasic
salts of carboxylic acids, especially C₁-C₁₀ carboxylic acids). Mixtures or combinations
of nonbasic salts may be advantageously employed. Preferably, the nonbasic salt is
soluble in the liquid phase of the epoxidation reaction mixture (which typically is
comprised of hydrogen peroxide, solvent, and olefin). "Nonbasic" in the context of
this invention means a substance which when dissolved at a concentration of 0.1N (or
to saturation, if the maximum possible concentration is less than 0.1N) in water at
25°C, provides a solution having a pH of less than 8 (more preferably less than 7.1)
but preferably greater than 4. In one embodiment, an essentially neutral salt is employed.
[0020] In one embodiment of this invention, nonbasic salts of phosphorus-, antimony, arsenic-,
and tin-containing oxy-acids and hydrous oxides of such elements are utilized. Such
oxy-acids and hydrous oxides may be either organic or inorganic in character, including,
for example, phosphoric acids, phosphorous acids, phosphonic acids, phosphinic acids,
stannic acids, arsenic acids, antimany acids and the like. Specific illustrative examples
are ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen
phosphate, disodium dihydrogen pyrophosphate, and the alkali metal and ammonium salts
of (nitrilotris(methylene)) triphosphonic acid, aminotrimethylene phosphonic acid,
(1-hydroxyethylidene) diphosphonic acid, and (ethylene dinitrilo)-tetramethylene phosphonic
acid and the like as well as the analogous tin, arsenic, and antimony compounds.
[0021] An especially desirable embodiment of the present invention involves selecting a
nonbasic salt which not only enhances epoxide selectivity when used in combination
with a titanium silicalite catalyst but which also acts as a hydrogen peroxide stabilizer
during the oxidatior, of a secondary alcohol to generate the hydrogen peroxide to
be used in epoxidation. That is, the nonbasic salt can be introduced during secondary
alcohol oxidation and then carried forward in the hydrogen peroxide stream to the
olefin epoxidation step. Nonbasic salts of oxy-acids of phosphorus are especially
useful for such purpose, particularly those compounds which sequester ions of heavy
metals such as ferric, cupric, cobaltic, and chromic ions.
[0022] To avoid an undesirable decrease in the rate of hydrogen peroxide conversion, the
concentration of nonbasic salt in the liquid phase within the reaction zone should
generally be no greater than 0.02 M. Below 0.00001 M, little or no enhancement in
epoxide selectivity is generally observed. The optimum concentration of nonbasic salt
which is utilized will vary depending upon a number of factors, including, for example,
the chemical identity of the nonbasic salt, temperature, solvent, space velocity,
and the like, but may be readily determined by routine experimentation. Generally
speaking, the level of nonbasic salt in the liquid phase epoxidation reaction mixture
is desirably maintained from about 1 to 1000 ppm.
[0023] The epoxidation reaction temperature is preferably from 0°C to 100°C (more preferably
from 40°C to 80°C), which has been found to be sufficient to accomplish selective
conversion of the olefin to epoxide within a reasonably short period of time with
minimal non-selective decomposition of the hydrogen peroxide. It is generally advantageous
to carry out the reaction to achieve as high a hydrogen peroxide conversion as possible,
preferably at least 50%, more preferably at least 90%, most preferably at least 99%,
consistent with reasonable selectivities. The optimum reaction temperature will be
influenced by catalyst concentration and activity, substrate reactivity, reactant
concentrations, and type of solvent employed, among other factors. Reaction or residence
times of from about 10 minutes to 48 hours will typically be appropriate, depending
upon the above-identified variables. The reaction is preferably performed at atmospheric
pressure or at elevated pressure (typically, between 1 and 100 atmospheres). Generally,
it will be desirable to maintain the reaction components as a liquid mixture. For
example, when an olefin such as propylene is used having a boiling point at atmospheric
pressure which is less than the epoxidation temperature, a superatmospheric pressure
sufficient to maintain the desired concentration of propylene in the liquid phase
is preferably utilized.
[0024] The epoxidation process of this invention may be carried out in a batch, continuous,
or semi-continuous manner using any appropriate type of reaction vessel or apparatus
such as a fixed bed, transport bed, stirred slurry, or CSTR reactor. Known methods
for conducting metal-catalyzed epoxidations using hydrogen peroxide will generally
also be suitable for use. Thus, the reactants may be combined all at once or sequentially.
For example, the hydrogen peroxide and/or the olefin may be added incrementally to
the reaction zone.
[0025] Epoxidation may be performed in the presence of a suitable solvent in order to dissolve
or disperse the reactants and to facilitate temperature control. Suitable solvents
include, but are not limited to, water, alcohols (especially C₁-C₁₀ aliphatic alcohols
such as methanol and isopropanol), ketones (especially C₃-C₁₀ ketones such as acetone),
and mixtures of such solvents.
[0026] Once the epoxidation has been carried out to the desired degree of conversion, the
epoxide product may be separated and recovered from the reaction mixture using any
appropriate technique such as fractional distillation, extractive distillation, liquid-liquid
extraction, crystallization, or the like. After separating from the epoxidation reaction
mixture by any suitable method such as filtration (as when a slurry reactor is utilized,
for example), the recovered titanium silicalite catalyst may be economically re-used
in subsequent epoxidations. Prior to such re-use, the catalyst may, if so desired,
be retreated with the nonbasic salt. Where the catalyst is deployed in the form of
a fixed bed, the epoxidation product withdrawn as a stream from the epoxidation zone
will be essentially catalyst free with the catalyst being retained within the epoxidation
zone. Similarly, any unreacted olefin or hydrogen peroxide may be separated and recycled
or otherwise disposed of. In certain embodiments of the instant process where the
epoxide is produced on a continuous basis, it may be desirable to periodically or
constantly regenerate all or a portion of the used catalyst in order to maintain optimum
activity and selectivity. Suitable regeneration techniques are well-known and include,
for example, calcination and solvent treatment. Regeneration can also include retreatment
or reimpregnation with the nonbasic salt.
[0027] From the foregoing description, one skilled in the art can readily ascertain the
essential characteristics of this invention, and, without departing from the spirit
and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to
adapt it to various usages, conditions, and embodiments.
EXAMPLES
Comparative Example 1
[0028] An isopropanol oxidate that has been fractionated to remove acetone was simulated
by combining isopropanol (86g) with 50% aqueous hydrogen peroxide (14g). The oxidate
was found to contain 6.87 wt % hydrogen peroxide by iodiometric titration. The oxidate
(33 g; 0.067 mol H₂O₂) and "TS-1" titanium silicalite catalyst (0.37g) were charged
to a 120ml stainless steel Parr reactor and fitted with a head containing a dip tube
attached to a propylene cylinder, a thermocouple, pressure gauge, and pressure relief
valve. Propylene (32 mL; 0.39 mol) was added and the reactor thereafter submerged
in a preheated oil bath. The reaction mixture was held at 55°C for 1 hour. The reactor
was transferred to an ice bath and vented at 5°C. The reaction product was iodiometrically
titrated and analyzed by gas chromatography, yielding the following results:
| Hydrogen peroxide, % conversion |
94 |
| Selectivity (based on H₂0₂), % |
|
| Propylene oxide |
74 |
| Acetone |
8 |
| Solvolysis products |
18 |
Example 2
[0029] An isopropanol oxidate was simulated by combining isopropanol (43 g), methanol (43
g), and 50% aqueous hydrogen peroxide (14 g); the oxidate contained 6.75 wt % H₂O₂.
The oxidate (33 g), TS-1 titanium silicalite catalyst (0.37 g), and lithium chloride
(0.0029 g) were reacted as described in Comparative Example 1. The following results
were obtained:
| Hydrogen peroxide, |
99 |
| % conversion % Selectivity (based on H₂0₂) |
|
| Propylene oxide |
93 |
| Acetone |
1 |
| Solvolysis products |
6 |
Comparative Example 3
[0030] Example 2 was repeated using lithium acetate dihydrate (0.0025 g) instead of lithium
chloride. The following results were obtained:
| Hydrogen peroxide, % conversion |
99 |
| % Selectivity (based on H₂0₂) |
|
| Propylene oxide |
91 |
| Acetone |
2 |
| Solvolysis products |
7 |
[0031] Examples 2 and 3 demonstrate that a nonbasic salt such as lithium chloride is contrary
to expectation, as effective as lithium acetate (one of the basic substances suggested
by U.S. Pat. No. 4,824,976) in improving the selectivity of a titanium silicalite
epoxidation catalyst.
Examples 4-6
[0032] Additional epoxidation runs were performed as described in Example 2 using 0.37 g
TS-1 titanium silicalite catalyst and different nonbasic salts. The concentration
listed is the concentration of nonbasic salt in the oxidate.
| Example No. |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| Nonbasic salt (ppm) |
Na₂SO₄(114) |
LiNO₃(106) |
NaCl(87) |
| Hydrogen peroxide, % conversion |
99 |
96 |
99 |
| Selectivity (based on H₂0₂), % |
|
|
|
| Propylene oxide |
89 |
90 |
87 |
| Acetone |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| Solvolysis products |
10 |
9 |
11 |
[0033] The above results show that a variety of alkali metal salts containing nonbasic anions
can be used at low concentrations to enhance selectivity to epoxide.
Comparative Examples 7-9
[0034] Examples 4-6 were repeated using certain of the basic substances described in U.S.
Pat. No. 4,824,976 instead of the nonbasic salts employed in the process of this invention.
In general, selectivity to propylene oxide was approximately the same no matter which
additive was employed.
| Example No. |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| Basic substance (ppm) |
Na₂HPO₄(61) |
NaOAc(36) |
NaOH(740) |
| Hydrogen peroxide, % conversion |
92 |
96 |
97 |
| Selectivity (based on H₂0₂), % |
|
|
|
| Propylene oxide |
90 |
90 |
89 |
| Acetone |
3 |
2 |
3 |
| Solvolysis products |
7 |
8 |
8 |
Examples 10-11
[0035] Examples 4-6 were repeated using magnesium acetate and ammonium acetate as the nonbasic
salt. Despite the fact that these salts are essentially neutral or slightly acidic,
in contrast to the basic sodium acetate used in Comparative Example 8, comparable
epoxidation results were obtained. This result was unexpected in light of the teaching
of U.S. Patent No. 4,824,976 that
basic substances are needed to improve epoxide selectivity.
| Example No. |
10 |
11 |
| Nonbasic salt (ppm) |
Mg(OAc)₂(213) |
NH₄OAc(82) |
| Hydrogen peroxide, % conversion |
96 |
96 |
| Selectivity (based on H₂0₂), % |
|
|
| Propylene oxide |
87 |
91 |
| Acetone |
2 |
2 |
| Solvolysis products |
11 |
7 |
Comparative Example 12
[0036] An isopropanol oxidate that has been fractionated to remove acetone and diluted with
methanol was simulated by combining isopropanol (43g), methanol (43g), 50% aqueous
H₂O₂ (14g), acetic acid (0.60g) and formic acid (0.15). The oxidate contained 6.88
wt. % H₂O₂ by iodometric titration. The oxidate (33g; 0.065 mol H₂O₂) and TS-1 titanium
silicalite catalyst (0.37g) were reacted as described in Comparative Example 1, with
the following results:
| Hydrogen Peroxide, % conversion |
99 |
| Selectivity (based on H₂O₂), % |
|
| Propylene Oxide |
79 |
| Acetone |
2 |
| Solvolysis Products |
19 |
Example 13
[0037] Comparative Example 12 was repeated, but with lithium nitrate (0.0038g; 114ppm) added
to the oxidate:
| Hydrogen Peroxide, % conversion |
99 |
| Selectivity (based on H₂O₂), % |
|
| Propylene Oxide |
88 |
| Acetone |
2 |
| Solvolysis Products |
10 |
[0038] The addition of the nonbasic salt resulted in a 9 point increase in epoxide selectivity,
but no loss of catalyst activity, as compared to Comparative Example 11.
Examples 14-20
[0039] A series of batch propylene epoxidations was performed using ammonium or sodium dihydrogen
phosphate as the nonbasic salt. The liquid feed (33g) to the reactor contained 82%
isopropanol, 15% water, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 0.2% acetic acid, and 0.025% formic
acid. The catalyst used was TS-1 titanium silicalite in powder form (0.20g). The results
obtained, shown in Table I, confirm that selectivity to propylene oxide is significantly
improved when nonbasic salt is present as compared to the control run (Example 14)
with no salt added. Surprisingly, the amount of ring-opened by-products formed is
reduced despite the fact that the phosphate salts are somewhat acidic in character.
Normally, ring-opening of an epoxide is promoted by the presence of acidic substances.

1. A method for epoxidizing an olefin comprising reacting said olefin with hydrogen peroxide
in a reaction zone in the presence of a titanium silicalite catalyst and an amount
of a nonbasic salt effective to improve selectivity to epoxide.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the nonbasic salt is selected from ammonium, alkali
metal, and alkaline earth halides, ammonium, alkali metal, and alkaline earth nitrates,
ammonium, alkali metal, and alkaline earth sulfates, ammonium, lithium, barium, calcium
and magnesium salts of C₁-C₁₀ carboxylic acids, and ammonium, alkali metal, and alkaline
earth salts of phosphorus-containing oxy-acids.
3. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein said reacting is performed at a temperature
of from 0°C to 100°C.
4. The method of any preceding claim wherein said reacting is performed in a liquid phase.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the liquid phase is comprised of a solvent selected
from water, C₁-C₁₀ alcohols, C₃-C₁₀ ketones, and mixtures thereof.
6. The method of any preceding claim wherein the olefin is a C₂-C₁₀ aliphatic olefin.
7. The method of any preceding claim wherein said reacting is carried out continuously.
8. The method of any preceding claim wherein the titanium silicalite catalyst is deployed
in the reaction zone in the form of a fixed bed.
9. The method of any preceding claim wherein the titanium silicalite catalyst is deployed
in the reaction zone in the form of a slurry.
10. The method of any preceding claim wherein the salt is present at a concentration of
from 0.00001M to 0.02M in the liquid medium.
11. A method according to any preceding claim wherein the nonbasic salt comprises a cation
selected from NH₄, Li, Na, K, Mg, and Ca and an anion selected from Cl, Br, NO₃, SO₄,
phosphate, and acetate.
12. A method for epoxidizing a C₂-C₁₀ aliphatic olefin comprising reacting said C₂-C₁₀
aliphatic olefin with hydrogen peroxide in a liquid phase within a reaction zone in
the presence of a solvent, a titanium silicalite catalyst, and a nonbasic salt comprising
a cation selected from NH₄, Li, Na, K, Mg, and Ca and an anion selected from Cl, Br,
NO₃, SO₄, phosphate, and acetate, subject to the proviso that when the anion is acetate,
the cation is a cation other than Na and K, said nonbasic salt being present at a
concentration of from 0.00001 M to 0.02 M in said liquid phase.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the titanium silicalite catalyst is deployed in the
form of a fixed bed within the reaction zone.
14. The method of claim 12 or claim 13 wherein the C₂-C₁₀ aliphatic olefin, hydrogen peroxide,
solvent, and nonbasic salt are introduced into the reaction zone and a product stream
comprised of an epoxide corresponding to the C₂-C₁₀ aliphatic olefin is withdrawn
from the reaction zone.
15. The method of claim 12 wherein the nonbasic salt is combined with the titanium silicalite
catalyst prior to introduction of the titanium silicalite catalyst into the reaction
zone.
16. The method of any of claims 12 to 15 wherein the solvent is selected from water, C₁-C₁₀
alcohols, C₃-C₁₀ ketones and mixtures thereof.
17. The method of any preceding claim wherein the nonbasic salt is selected from lithium
chloride, sodium sulfate, lithium nitrate, magnesium acetate, ammonium acetate, ammonium
dihydrogen phosphate, and sodium dihydrogen phosphate.
18. The method of any preceding claim wherein the olefin is propylene.
19. The method of any preceding claim wherein the temperature is from 40°C to 80°C.
20. The method of any preceding claim wherein the titanium silicalite catalyst has an
MFI, MEL, or zeolite beta topology.
21. The method of any preceding claim wherein the titanium silicalite catalyst has a composition
corresponding to the chemical formula xTiO₂:(1-x)SiO₂ wherein x is from 0.01 to 0.125.
22. The method of claim 20 wherein the titanium silicalite has an MFI topology and a composition
corresponding to the chemical formula xTiO₂:(1-x) SiO₂, wherein x is from 0.01 to
0.125.