FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to in-line skate wheels. More specifically, the invention
relates to the shape and construction of in-line skate wheels.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Since its inception in 1980, in-line skating has rapidly gained acceptance and popularity
to become one of the fastest growing sports in North America and elsewhere. Each year,
thousands of new in-line skaters take to this new activity as a form of fitness or
recreation. Organized events such as racing, roller hockey, recreational skating and
artistic skating are increasingly being staged in many neighbourhood communities.
[0003] Modelled after ice skating, in-line skating incorporates many of the traditional
techniques practised in its sister sport. Ice manoeuvres such as the basic 45° sideways
push out, sculling, and crossover turning are all similarly performed on wheels.
[0004] To enhance the safe performance of these manoeuvres on the road, today's in-line
skates are equipped with polyurethane wheels capable of maintaining good traction
against the ground when the skate is in motion. In addition, these relatively soft
wheels (approximately 78A durometer (hardness)) also assist in propelling the skater
by generating a spring effect as the skater pushes off the skate during his/her forward
stride and cushion the feel of the road.
[0005] Associated with these soft wheels however is an increase in the amount of rolling
resistance. Greater effort must be expended by the skater to overcome the increased
friction which causes a loss of performance particularly on straightaways. Another
disadvantage inherent to the use of softer wheels is their tendency to wear out quickly.
Harder wheels are therefore preferred because they reduce rolling resistance and it
seems that users will sacrifice a bit of comfort for improved performance.
[0006] A compromise has been proposed by Klamer in U.S. Patent No. 5,129,709 who discloses
an in-line skate wheel having a relatively hard central core body flanked symmetrically
by a pair of side wall bodies made of a softer material. Thus, when the skater is
moving straight sheed purportedly substantially only the relatively hard radially
outer surface of the central core will be in contact with the ground to minimize rolling
resistance and increase speed. On curves however, the softer side wall bodies will
contact the ground to increase traction for better grip and handling. This configuration
however funnels large amounts of shock and vibration to the wheel's hub and then to
the skater.
[0007] Moreover, despite such improvements to in-line skate wheels, there is still a considerable
performance gap between in-line and ice skates, particularly in the areas of tight
turns, T-stops and the ability to control or shed speed by snow plowing particularly
for novices and chiidren when rolling downhill or when approaching an opponent's goal
prior to shooting.
[0008] Existing brakes for in-line skates comprise a piece of hard rubber or polyurethane
affixed to the underside of the heel portion of the skate(s). To actuate this braking
mechanism, a skater usually scissors the braking leg forward to transfer most of his/her
weight on the braking leg. The scissored leg is then used to depress the brake heel
along the ground in the direction of travel. Braking in this manner is unnatural,
ineffective, and quite often unsafe. A more natural positioning and efficient stop
can be attained either by snow plowing or by turning sideways to the direction of
travel and sliding to a stop as if on ice skates. This technique is known as power
sliding or power stopping and requires a highly skilled in-line skater for its successful
performance. Attempting this manoeuvre with existing technology will send the average
skater head over heels.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved wheel for
use on in-line skates that minimizes rolling resistance and decreases the effort the
skater must expend.
[0010] It is another object of the invention to provide an improved wheel for use on in-line
skates having the beneficial shock absorption characteristics and spring effect provided
by currently available "soft" wheels while also providing the performance advantages
offered by harder wheels.
[0011] It is still another object in a preferred embodiment of the invention to provide
an improved wheel for use on in-line skates capable of lateral or sliding stop movements.
[0012] It is still a further object of the preferred embodiments of the present invention
to provide an improved wheel for use on in-line skates incorporating some or all of
the foregoing advantages for specific uses including racing, outdoor everyday skating
over uneven, non-homogenous surfaces, high performance play on smooth, homogeneous
sport surfaces and stunt skating.
[0013] According to the invention there is provided a skate wheel comprising hub means for
rotation about an axis; a plurality of layers of material disposed concentrically
about said hub, each of said plurality of layers consisting of a material having a
predetermined durometric hardness, the outermost of said layers including an outer
surface adapted for a rolling motion of said wheel over a surface.
[0014] In one embodiment, said plurality of layers comprise an inner core disposed concentrically
about said hub means and made of a material having a first durometric hardness and
an outer core disposed concentrically about said inner core and made of a material
having a second durometric hardness, said outer core being adapted for rolling over
a surface.
[0015] In one embodiment said outer core exceeds the durometric hardness of said inner core.
[0016] In another embodiment the skate wheel comprises ring means annularly disposed in
said outer core, said ring means having an outer ground engaging peripheral surface,
the diameter of said ring means exceeding the diameter of said outer core such that
ground engaging surface of said ring means protrudes radially outwardly from said
outer surface of said outer core. Preferably, the coefficient of friction of said
material comprising said ring means is less than the coefficient of friction of said
material comprising said outermost layer whereby said ring means facilitates sliding
motion of said wheel relative to a surface. In one embodiment the ring means are pliant
for flexion thereof.
[0017] In another embodiment the skate includes stiffening rings disposed in said inner
core to prevent excessive flexure thereof due to torsional loading of said wheel.
[0018] In one embodiment, the durometric hardness of said inner core falls in the range
of shore 40A to 80A, and the durometric hardness of said outer core falls within the
range of shore 72A to 96A.
[0019] According to another aspect, the invention provides a wheel for an in-line skate,
comprising hub means for rotation about an axis; circular ring means disposed concentrically
about said hub means, said ring means having an outer ground engaging peripheral surface;
and core means disposed concentrically about said hub means for at least partially
supporting said ring means in a ground engaging position thereof, said core means
having an outer ground engaging peripheral surface and being made of a material having
a higher coefficient of friction compared to said ring means; wherein the diameter
of said ring means exceeds the diameter of said core means to provide a discrete radial
transition from said ground engaging surface of said core means to said ground engaging
surface of said ring means.
[0020] In the latter embodiment said core means preferably comprises at least one inner
core and an annular outer core, each of said inner and outer cores being made of a
material having a predetermined durometric hardness.
[0021] In one embodiment the durometric hardness of said outer core exceeds the durometric
hardness of said at least one inner core.
[0022] Preferably, a line tangentially intersecting said ground engaging surfaces of both
said ring means and said core means defines an angle to said wheel's axis in the range
of 15° to 35°.
[0023] According to the present invention then, there is provided a wheel for an in-line
skate, comprising hub means for rotation about an axis, circular ring means disposed
concentrically about said hub means, said ring means having an outer ground engaging
peripheral surface, and core means disposed concentrically about said hub means for
at least partially supporting said ring means in a ground engaging position thereof,
said core means having an outer ground engaging peripheral surface and being made
of a material having a higher coefficient of friction compared to said ring means,
wherein the diameter of said ring means exceeds the diameter of said core means to
provide a discrete radial transition from said ground engaging surface of said core
means to said ground engaging surface of said ring means.
[0024] According to a further aspect of the present invention then, there is provided a
skate wheel for an in-line skate comprising hub means for rotation about an axis,
a plurality of layers of material disposed concentrically about said hub, each of
said plurality of layers consisting of a material having a predetermined durometric
hardness, the outermost of said layers including an outer surface adapted for a rolling
motion of said wheel over a surface.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0025] Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described in greater detail
and will be better understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings,
in which:
Figure 1 is a front elevational, partially sectional view of the present wheel;
Figure 2 is a side elevational view of the present wheel adapted for all-terrain use;
Figure 3 is a cross-sectional view of the wheel of Figure 2 along the line A-A;
Figure 4 is a side elevational view of a slip ring forming part of the wheel of Figure
3;
Figure 5 is a cross-sectional view of the slip ring of Figure 4 along the line A-A;
Fiqure 6 is a side elevational view of an inner core forming part of the wheel of
Figure 3;
Figure 7 is a cross-sectional view of the inner core of Figure 6 along the line B-B;
Figure 8 is a side elevational view of the hub of the wheel of Figure 3;
Figure 9 is a cross-sectional view of the hub of Figure 8 along the line C-C;
Figure 10 is a side elevational view of a further modified wheel;
Figure 11 is a cross-sectional view of the wheel of Figure 10 along the line A-A;
Figure 12 is a side elevational view of the slip ring of the wheel of Figure 10;
Figure 13 is a cross-sectional view of the slip ring of Figure 12 along the line A-A;
Figure 14 is a side elevational view of a further modified wheel for racing;
Figure 15 is a cross-sectional view of the wheel of Figure 14;
Figure 16 is a side elevational view of a further modified wheel for stunt skating;
Figure 17 is a cross-sectional view of the wheel of Figure 16 along the line A-A;
Figure 18 is a cross-sectional view of a modified dual durometer wheel;
Figure 19 is a side elevational view of a slip ring forming part of the wheel of Figure
18;
Figure 20 is a cross-sectional view of the slip ring of Figure 19 along the line A-A;
Figure 21 is a perspective view of a tube-style hub for use in connection with an
in-line skate wheel;
Figure 22 is a plan view of the hub of Figure 21;
Figure 23 is a side elevational view of the hub of Figure 21;
Figure 24 is a cross-sectional view of the wheel of Figure 18 in an unflexed condition;
Figure 25 is a cross-sectional view of the wheel of Figure 24 in a flexed condition;
Figure 26 is a cross-sectional view of a further modified dual durometer in-line skate
wheel;
Figure 27 is a perspective wheel of another tube-style hub for an in-line skate wheel;
Figure 28 is a perspective view of a dual durometer wheel on a spoked in-line skate
wheel hub;
Figure 29 is a sectional view of the wheel and hub of Figure 28;
Figure 30 is a partially cut-away perspective view of a further modified in-line skate
wheel; and
Figure 31 is a perspective view of the inner core of the wheel of Figure 30.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0026] With reference to Figure 1, the present wheel in its basic form comprises a hub 5,
and a pair of outer sidewalls 20 of polyurethane sandwiching a central disk or slip
ring 10 of relatively hard material, the outer ground engaging annular surface 11
of ring 10 being raised to radially protrude from the adjacent ground engaging surfaces
19 of sidewalls 20. Advantageously, a line "a" drawn tangentially to both surfaces
11 and 19 defines an angle e ideally but not necessarily of 22° or in the range of
15° to 35° measured from normally horizontal axis h. Accordingly, the raised or stepped
profile of surface 11 relative to surrounding surfaces 19 provides for a controllable
transition from the relatively hard material of slip ring 10 to the softer material
of sidewalls 20 as the wheels move from a relatively upright position to a more tilted
attitude for snow plowing and lateral stops. This allows the skater to more easily
take advantage of the different properties and characteristics offered by the inner
and outer layers and to gradually and controllably bring the softer resin of the sidewalls
into frictional contact with the ground. This avoids sending the skater headlong during
such manoeuvres. With use, slip ring 10 will of course wear down from its original
diameter but so too will sidewalls 20 so that there will remain a stepped transition
between the two for the useful life of the wheel.
[0027] Slip ring 10 is advantageously manufactured from a relatively hard material (shore
D85) having a low coefficient of friction permitting slip when performing lateral
stops or snow plowing, but which is also possessed of a high degree of impact/abrasion
resistance. Suitable materials include UHMWPE or, more preferably, a petrowax-filled
nylon 6/6, a molybdenum disulfide (MoS
2) filled nylon 6/6, a modified filled polyethylene or thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU).
The somewhat "grippier" TPU may be preferred if the wheels are to be used on homogeneous
polypropylene playing surfaces as will be described below. These latter materials
can be manufactured using injection molding techniques having a lower cost/part life
ratio compared to compression molding techniques required for UHMWPE. If UHMWPE is
used, it has been found that improved results are obtained by adding 30% by volume
glass fiber or beads for greater compressive strength and product integrity. Silicon
oil may also be added for a hydroplaning medium in order to improve slip.
[0028] Most wheels sold in the market today have a nylon hub adjoining a uniform durometer
polyurethane outer body. Conventionally, skaters like softer wheels because they provide
a comfortable ride and act like springs which, when released by the push of the leg,
rebound to convert energy back into some forward motion. Because the wheels are always
on an angle of attack normal to the annular axis of the wheel to the ground to propel
a skater, a spring effect is very useful. However, as aforesaid, softer wheels offer
a higher rolling resistance and suffer higher abrasion as the price of comfort. The
wheels simply wear much faster because of the softer durometer material used in their
manufacture. As will now be described in greater detail, Applicant's wheel improves
energy conversion in two (or more) part wheels and reduces wear due to abrasion without
sacrificing speed and comfort in a wheel that more closely mimics the lateral performance
characteristics of an ice skate in terms of permitting ice hockey stops and snow plowing.
[0029] As will be appreciated, slip ring 10 as shown in Figure 1 provides little or no rebound
or spring effect nor shock absorption or reduction of road vibration on its own due
to the hardness (Shore D85) of the material from which it is made. Rebound is poor
as well because the thickness of the ring is the only area transmitting the load back
to the hub. These disadvantages are also suffered by Klamer's wheel.
[0030] With reference to Figures 2 and 3 wherein like numerals are used to denote like elements,
these problems are overcome by means of a modified multi-durometer multiple layered
wheel including a nylon hub 15 adjoined to a softer durometer (40A-80A) middle or
inner core 40 which in turn is concentrically adjoined to an outer harder durometer
body 50. This minimizes both abrasion and rolling resistance by using a harder outer
body (for example, 72A-96A) while absorbing shock to the foot and giving maximum rebound
with every push of the leg due to the relative softness of inner core 40. In this
context, rebound is considered the height a wheel recovers from an initial drop height
when dropped on a skating surface. The higher the recovery height the better the rebound.
[0031] In the embodiment of Figure 2 and with particular reference to Figures 3 to 5, it
will be seen that a clip ring 10 is additionally included and is supported within
outer body 50. Each slip ring includes an outer ground-engaging portion 51, a plurality
of apertures 53 formed therethrough for mechanical adhesion to the polyurethane outer
50, and an inner T-ring 55 that distributes the load on the slip ring to the softer
inner body. Inner body 40 may include bellows 45 formed on opposite outer sidewalls
42 thereof for aesthetics and which might also (perhaps) improve shock absorption
and resiliency. With reference to Figure 7, each side of inner body 40, when seen
in cross-section, is roughly frusto-conical in shape including a basal surface 43
that adjoins hub 15, tapered flanks 44 and contiguous shoulders 42, and a crown 47
that abuts inner opposed surface 53 of T-ring 55. Crown 47 may be formed with a slight
outwardly convex curvature as seen
best from Figure 7 and also is advantageously slightly wider than abutting surface 53
of the T-ring for maximum load transference from the T-ring to soft core 40. A circumferentially
extending groove 46 in basal surface 43 is shaped to conformably receive annular hub
insert or nib 7 (Figure 9) thereinto to position and centre body 40 relative to the
hub. Hub 15 and body 40 may be bonded together and additional mechanical adhesion
is provided by the string of apertures 4 formed through nib 7 along its length. As
will be appreciated, the material comprising body 40 flows through and solidifies
into and about these apertures to form a strong and permanent connection with the
hub. In other respects, hub 15 is conventional in size and shape and need not be described
further herein.
[0032] It will be seen that in the embodiment of Figures 10 to 13, soft core 40 is omitted
but a wider T-ring 65 is used. This model as shown includes a more squared outer ground
engaging surface 58 on outer body 50 for use on polypropylene surfaces commonly called
SPORT COURT
1 and similar materials for roller hockey games. The slip ring is quite slippery and
the flatter wheel bottom provided by the squared profile has been found to provide
for a greater push and stop effect without excessive slipping. Because SPORT COURT
and similar surfaces are smooth and regular in nature, the shock absorbing and flexing
characteristics of soft core 40 desirable in the all-terrain wheel of Figure 2 may
not be as needed but this of course will be subject to the preferences of the user,
as will the cross-sectional shape of ground engaging surface 58. The all-terrain shape
of Figure 3 as well as the profile of Figure 15 can also be used with good results
on playing surfaces and could well be preferred by some users. Hub 15 is another conventional
configuration and will not therefore be described in greater detail. This style of
hub obviously lacks annular nib 7. Bonding between hub 15 and outer body 50 (or core
40 if present) may be conventional chemical or covalent adhesion.
1 Trade-mark
[0033] In the all-terrain wheel exemplified by the embodiment of Figures 2 and 3, the wheel's
outer profile is somewhat more rounded because more traction is inherently available
from cement, asphalt and other irregular surfaces typically found outdoors. This wheel
provides for great manoeuvrability in view of its combination of profile and dual
durometer construction. This permits the marketing of wheels having only a single
outer diameter. It's typical to use, for example, a 72 mm wheel for more manoeuvrability,
but at the cost of speed. For more speed, a wheel having a larger outer diameter (e.g.
78 mm) would be purchased. The present wheel, with or without the slip ring, can be
manufactured, if desired, in a single size of, for example, 76.5 mm to provide both
speed, manoeuvrability and enhanced braking capabilities.
[0034] As stopping is not as important a requirement in racing, applicant's dual durometer
racing wheel as exemplified by the embodiment of Figures 14 and 15 is shown without
a slip ring. In other respects, this wheel is similar to applicant's all-terrain wheel
shown in Figure 2 apart from the curvature of outer ground engaging surface 58 of
outer body 50. For racing, the cross-sectional profile of surface 58 is advantageously
more parabolic in shape as best seen from Figure 15.
[0035] A similar embodiment with a soft core 40 but without a slip ring which is particularly
useful for stunt skating is shown in Figures 16 and 17. This wheel is somewhat wider
and is also quite squat in shape, with ground engaging surface 58 of outer body 50
having a relatively large radius of curvature for maximum ground contact. The hardness
of outer body 50 will advantageously be in the range of 88A to 96A.
[0036] Another wheel construction is shown with reference to Figure 18 wherein once again
like numerals are used to denote like elements. As will be seen, the wheel is of dual
durometer construction including a relatively soft inner core 40, a harder polyurethane
outer core 50 and a hub 115 which in this instance is a simple tube-type hub which
is shown in greater detail in Figures 21 to 23 and is commercially available from
B.F. Goodrich as the ESTALOC™ 59300. With this sort of hub, the hub's outer peripheral
surface 116 is covalently bonded to the polyurethane wheel material to form a permanent
connection therebetween.
[0037] In this embodiment, it will be seen that slip ring 100 "floats" in outer core 50
and therefore lacks a T-ring 55 that contacts crown 47 of core 40 for load transfer.
This permits ring 100 to be more flexible. It has been found that the stiffer the
slip ring, the greater the wheel's loss of rebound (bounce), speed, vibration damping
and enjoyment of ride. It remains desirable nevertheless that the slip ring present
a uniform and non-segmented configuration to the ground. O'Donnell in U.S. Patent
No. 5,401,037 attempts to retain a larger ring while addressing the flexibility problem
by using a relatively large disk with segmented, spiralled or wavy sections. O'Donnell
purports for example that separated disk Sections remain flexible because they are
jointed at only one end. The problem with these configurations however is that segments,
waves and spirals all present a non-smooth and patterned configuration to the ground
that sets up a high frequency vibration as the outer surface of the wheel transitions
between relatively hard disk material and relatively soft wheel material between the
disk segments as it rolls along. Users of this sort of wheel find the feel unacceptable
after as little as five minutes of skating.
[0038] With reference to Figures 19 and 20, slip ring 100 retains its outer ground engaging
portion 51 that is radially raised relative to the surrounding ground engaging surfaces
of outer core 50. The radius of curvature of surface 51 may vary considerably but
will typically fall in the range of .050 to .250 inched. Seen best from Figure 20,
the ring's side walls 101 include circumferentially extending preferably continuous
grooves 102 to augment chemical and mechanical connection to the surrounding and supporting
polyurethane of outer layer 50.
[0039] Although slip ring 100 is advantageously as flexible as possible, it should also,
in order to provide the advantages of power stopping, etc. have a lower coefficient
of friction than that of the material comprising outer core 50. To date, the best
known material for the construction of a more flexible ring 100 is polybutylene terephthalate
and a soft (amorphous) segment based on long-chain polyether glycol sold commercially
by DuPont™ under the trade-mark HYTREL. For outdoor applications, HYTREL 6356 is proposed
whereas for indoor applications particularly on uniform and/or homogenous playing
surfaces HYTREL 5526 is proposed. HYTREL has a higher coefficient of friction than
UHMWPE, TEFLON™ or the other ring materials mentioned above, but is nevertheless "slippery"
enough to provide the advantages sought from a slip ring. Moreover, having a higher
coefficient of friction than scome other materials means a reduction in slip when
slip is not wanted. The lateral width of the slip ring will vary for optimal results
depending upon the material used. For example, a narrower or thinner slip ring is
appropriate when using a relatively "slippery" material. Conversely, a wider ring
provides better results when using a less slippery material. Thus, the width of the
ring will be chosen depending upon the material used in order to obtain the desired
balance between slip and grip. When using HYTREL, a ring width of .200'' has been
found to provide good results but even this may vary depending upon the type or grade
of HYTREL being employed.
[0040] The raised profile of the slip ring makes it easier for first time users to adapt
to the wheels. The wheels will also "break in" to the style and wear pattern of each
individual user. For example, the ring will wear to the individual angle of braking
for each skater.
[0041] It has been found that an additional advantage of applicant's unique dual durometer
wheel is its ability to flex sideways under bend-inducing torsional loads. This has
been found to contribute to a significant reduction in wear, particularly to outer
core 50, and to provide better contact with the ground surface at all times. A conventional
wheel, particularly one made of a harder material, tends not to flex under such loads,
which therefore transfers the load to a narrower width side wall portion of the wheel
which then begins to wear quickly and unevenly. Moreover, at such high angles of attack
to the ground with the normal force being vectored at a correspondingly higher angle,
instability sets in with the wheel eventually losing grip altogether causing the skater
to fall. This is comparable to "losing an edge" on an ice skate.
[0042] The ability of the present wheel to flex is most clearly illustrated in Figures 24
and 25. As shown, inner core 40, being of a softer material, can actually flex sideways
under torsional loads so that outer layer 50, as seen most clearly in Figure 25, remains
more on the sidewall radii relative to the ground for a more even and secure contact
therewith. This advantage flows whether or not slip ring 100 is present in the wheel.
[0043] Actually, it has been found that if the inner core flexes too much, the wheels may
no longer track straight. Such over-flexing is usually avoided when using the sort
of hub 15 illustrated in Figures 8 and 9 which includes nib 7. The nib acts as a stiffening
spine to prevent or at least minimize over-flexion of core 40. However, not all wheel
manufacturers use this sort of hub and the presence of nib 7 itself reduces the amount
of relatively soft urethane in inner core 40 disposed between the outer ground engaging
surfaces of core 50 and hub 15. Some manufacturers prefer simple tube type hubs 115
such as those shown in Figures 21 to 23 and in Figure 27. Hub 115 in Figure 27 in
particular includes a circumferentially extending middle recess 117. Although the
urethane and the hub are normally bonded together covalently, the recess provides
additional semi-mechanical undercut so that the urethane also mechanically adheres
to the hub for an added margin of safety to the connection.
[0044] To avoid over-torsioning in a wheel using a simple tube hub, one approach is to increase
the hardness of the inner core's polyurethane (or other material) from, for example,
shore 72A to Shore 76A. The use of the harder material in the inner core is at least
partially offset in terms of the loss of damping by the added thickness of the core
due to the elimination of nib 7. Thus, good results have been obtained in a wheel
with an inner core having a hardness of Shore 76A, and an outer core having a hardness
of Shore 86A or 87A.
[0045] Another approach is to change the cross-sectional shape of inner core 40 as shown
in Figure 26. As will be seen, in this embodiment, inner core 40 presents a flatter
and shallower profile. This profile reduces unwanted torsion under bending loads,
and, if desired, the reduction in its thickness can, for damping purposes, be offset
in whole or in part by using a softer material, e.g., shore 72A or perhaps lower.
[0046] With reference to Figures 28 and 29, applicant's dual durometer wheel is shown in
combination with a spoked hub 125. Spoked hubs are popular because of their "look".
Spoked hubs are primarily a variation on simple tube hubs but may, as shown in Figure
29, lack a central recess 117. As will therefore be seen best from Figure 29, inner
core 40, which, as shown in this figure, is of the shallow type described above with
reference to Figure 26, is bonded covalently to the hub in the manner known in the
art.
[0047] Yet another approach to reducing torsional flex is shown with reference to the wheel
of Figures 30 and 31 wherein like numerals are once again used to denote like elements.
The wheel once again comprises an outer core 50 of relatively hard material, a concentrically
inner core 40 of relatively softer material (the material for the inner and outer
cores typically being a polyurethane), and a hub 115. A plurality of stiffening spokes
132 extend between outer layer 50 and hub 115. The spokes can be of the same material
as the outer layer and may be formed integrally therewith when the outer core is formed
onto the inner core. In this regard, inner core 40 is formed with cavities 133 corresponding
in shape to spokes 132 so that these cavities fill with the harder polyurethane of
the outer core during its formation. In the embodiment shown, four trapezoidally shaped
spokes are formed at 90° intervals on each side of core 40. Depending upon the degree
of stiffening required, there may be more or fewer of such spokes, and the shape and
thickness thereof may vary as well.
[0048] The foregoing descriptions of the present wheels having two concentric layers 40
and 50 are intended to be exemplary of multi-layered, multi-durometer wheels as contemplated
by the present invention. It is intended however that alternative configurations including
three or more layers of the same or differing hardnesses and types of material should
also fall within the scope of the present invention. For example, a wheel might have
three concentric cores or layers (excluding the slip ring) of material, comprising
two relatively hard layers sandwiching a relatively softer layer. Or there might be
multiple layers of material grading in hardness from the hardest at the outer perimeter
to softer and softer layers proceeding towards the hub. There may be instances as
well in which it might be useful to use a softer material for the outer core with
the harder material being used for the inner core (or cores). Cores of the same relative
hardness might be used as might cores of different materials having the same or differing
relative hardnesses. Nor is it intended that the cross-sectional shapes of the layers
themselves as disclosed herein be limitative. Other shapes are possible without departing
from the inventive scope of the present invention.
[0049] Providing the improved wheels an described above simplifies choices for consumers
who will no longer be put to the election between soft and hard, short or long wearing
and so forth. Applicant's wheels provide speed, comfort and durability as well as
improved performance in areas of stopping, snow plowing and turning having regard
to the scope permitted for lateral movements of the wheels provided by the slip ring.
[0050] Hub materials can also be chosen for chemical bonding to the polyurethane outer body..
[0051] In one embodiment constructed by the applicant, the radius of curvature of surface
11 of slip ring 10 is 0.100 inch.
[0052] For aesthetic purposes, the polyurethane outer bodies can be transparent so that
the slip ring is visible. This provides a "high tech" look to the wheel's appearance
useful for marketing purposes.
[0053] The above-described embodiments of the present invention are meant to be illustrative
of preferred embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the
scope of the present invention. Various modifications, which would be readily apparent
to one skilled in the art, are intended to be within the scope of the present invention.
The only limitations to the scope of the present invention are set out in the following
appended claims.
1. A skate wheel for an in-line skate comprising:
hub means for rotation about an axis;
a plurality of layers of material disposed concentrically about said hub, each of
said plurality of layers consisting of a material having a predetermined durometric
hardness, the outermost of said layers including an outer surface adapted for a rolling
motion of said wheel over a surface.
2. The wheel of claim 1 wherein said plurality of layers comprise an inner core disposed
concentrically about said hub means and made of a material having a first durometric
hardness and an outer core disposed concentrically about said inner core and made
of a material having a second durometric hardness, said outer core being adapted for
rolling over a surface.
3. The wheel of claim 2 wherein the durometric hardness of said outer core exceeds the
durometric hardness of said inner core.
4. The wheel of claims 2 or 3 including ring means annularly disposed in said outer core,
said ring means having an outer ground engaging peripheral surface, the diameter of
said ring means exceeding the diameter of said outer core such that ground engaging
surface of said ring means protrudes radially outwardly from said outer surface of
said outer core.
5. The wheel of claim 4 wherein the coefficient of friction of said material comprising
said ring means is less than the coefficient of friction of said material comprising
said outermost layer whereby said ring means facilitates sliding motion of said wheel
relative to a surface.
6. The wheel of claims 4 or 5 wherein said ring means are pliant for flexion thereof.
7. The wheel of any preceding claim including stiffening means disposed in said inner
core to prevent excessive flexure thereof due to torsional loading of said wheel.
8. The wheel of any preceding claim wherein the durometric hardness of said inner core
falls in the range of Shore 40A to 80A, and the durometric hardness of said outer
core falls within the range of Shore 72A to 96A.
9. A wheel for an in-line skate, comprising:
hub means for rotation about an axis;
circular ring means disposed concentrically about said hub means, said ring means
having an outer ground engaging peripheral surface; and
core means disposed concentrically about said hub means for at least partially supporting
said ring means in a ground engaging position thereof, said core means having an outer
ground engaging peripheral surface and being made of a material having a higher coefficient
of friction compared to said ring means;
wherein the diameter of said ring means exceeds the diameter of said core means to
provide a discrete radial transition from said ground engaging surface of said core
means to said ground engaging surface of said ring means.
10. The wheel of claim 9 wherein said core means comprise at least one inner core and
an annular outer core, each of said inner and outer cores being made of a material
having a predetermined durometric hardness.
11. The wheel of claim 10 wherein the durometric hardness of said outer core exceeds the
durometric hardness of said at least one inner core.
12. The wheel of any preceding claim wherein a line tangentially intersecting said ground
engaging surfaces of both said ring means and said core means defines an angle to
said wheel's axis in the range of 15° to 35°.