BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a system for attenuation of noise for use with sound
receiving devices. More particularly, the present invention is concerned with a system
for attenuating acoustic background sounds in devices employing a microphone for receiving
and utilizing sound waves applied thereto.
[0002] As experienced by many, background sounds, which will be referred to hereinafter
as "noise", in accordance with the commonly acceptable definition thereof, which is
"undesired sound", are very disturbing when, for example, conducting a telephone conversation
from outdoor telephone booths or when using a microphone to broadcast information
from outside premises, such as sports fields or arenas, and other like locations.
[0003] There are known in the art several techniques for noise suppression. The first one
utilizes a special construction of a microphone providing different sensitivities
to sound waves, reaching the microphone from different directions. Such microphones,
known as directional microphones, suffer, however, from the obvious disadvantage of
not being able to provide a satisfactory solution to sound received from directions
other than the two preset, very distinct directions.
[0004] Another known noise cancelling technique utilizes electronic generation of "anti-noise"
signals precisely out of phase with the incoming noise signals. This technique involves
digital processing of sound signals and the irradiation of noise signals into space,
out of phase with the phase of the incoming noise signals, so as to cancel out only
the incoming noise signals.
[0005] A more common noise cancellation technique employs several individual microphones
disposed in spaced-apart relationship producing output signals corrresponding to the
sound picked up thereby, which signals are then processed and delayed in different
ways to obtain an improved signal to noise ratio. This technique is also quite involved
and necessitates special equipment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] It is therefore a broad object of the present invention to provide a system for noise
attenuation independent of direction, utilizing optically operated microphone devices.
[0007] It is a further object of the present invention to provide a system for noise attenuation
having an improved signal to noise ratio, utilizing optically operated microphone
devices.
[0008] In accordance with the present invention there is therefore provided a noise attenuation
system for use with sound receiving devices, comprising first and second relatively
small optical microphone devices having at least one sound responsive membrane operative
to produce an output signal in accordance with sound waves picked up by said microphone
devices, at least one pair of light guides affixed to said first or second microphone
devices, said pair of light guides each having an input end portion and an output
end portion, the input end portion of a first light guide being connectable to a source
of light and the output end portion of said second light guide being connectable to
a light intensity detecting means, each of the output portion of said first light
guide and input end portion of said second light guide having an axis and a rim and
being oriented with respect to each other to include an angle between said axes, and
each of said light guide rims being cut at an angle with respect to the axis of its
light guide, wherein in operation, the intensity of light reflected by said membrane
and detected by said light intensity measuring means, represents sound intensities
picked up by said first and second microphone devices, or the differences between
said intensities.
[0009] The invention will now be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments
with reference to the following illustrative figures so that it may be more fully
understood.
[0010] With specific reference now to the figures in detail, it is stressed that the particulars
shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred
embodiments of the present invention only and are presented in the cause of providing
what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles
and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show
structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental
understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent
to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied
in practice.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011]
Fig. 1 is a block diagram exemplifying principles of the system for attenuation of
noise according to the present invention;
Fig. 2 illustrates an embodiment of microphone devices coupling and orientation utilizable
with an acoustic field originating at a near distance;
Fig. 3 illustrates an embodiment of microphone devices coupling and orientation utilizable
with an acoustic field originating at a far distance;
Fig. 4 illustrates still a further embodiment of an arrangement of microphones devices
with an acoustical barrier thereinbetween;
Figs. 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d and 5e illustrate a plurality of possible dispositions of two
microphones devices with respect to each other;
Figs. 6a, 6b, 6c and 6d illustrate a plurality of possible dispositions of an acoustical
barrier for various orientations of the two microphone devices;
Fig. 7 illustrates the structure of two fiber optic-type microphone devices, utilizable
in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 8 depicts a light intensity vs. distance graph for better understanding of the
operation of the system according to the present invention, and
Figs. 9 to 11 illustrate three different arrangements of the microphone devices according
to the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0012] In Fig. 1 there is schematically illustrated the principles of a system for attenuation
of noise, according to the present invention. Seen are two optical microphone devices
2 and 4 positioned in close proximity to each other. Each microphone device leads
via an operational amplifier 6 or 8 to a substraction circuit 10 in which the signals,
representing sound intensities picked up by the microphone devices, are substracted
from each other. The subtracted output signal may then be amplified at amplifier 12,
prior to being further utilized.
[0013] The microphone devices 2 and 4 are relatively small and preferably of the type described
and illustrated in Israel Patent Specification No. 111,913, filed December 7th, 1994.
The fact that at least the sound pick up elements, e.g., a sound responsive membrane
of the microphone devices, are very small, enables the disposition of the elements
very close to each other, so that for acoustical waves originating at a far distance,
the elements are effectively located at the same place and thus substantially equally
sensing the incoming waves. This, of course, is the situation when the microphone
devices are designed to have the same sensitivity and phase characteristics. Similarly,
the amplifiers 6 and 8 are designed to provide the same amplification and phase characteristics.
Hence, the output signal from the subtraction circuit 10 or amplifier 12, will be
very small or close to zero. This can be better understood from the following mathematical
derivation.
[0014] Assuming that the intensity I of sound at the point of microphone device is

where
Io is the intensity of the sound source, and
L is the distance to the sound source, and
supposing that the distance to the far (noisy) source of sound from the first microphone
device is L
1 and from the second microphone device is L
2, the distance from both microphone devices to the source of near (informative) sound
is L
3 and L
4, so that

where, L is the distance between two microphone devices,
and assuming that L << L
1, L
2;
and that

,

, L
2,
then, under these suppositions, the difference in sound intensities between both microphone
devices will be:

If the intensities of sound near both microphone devices from the far source and
from the near source will be the same:

sound signal/noise ratio k, will be:

[0015] Assuming that the intensity of the far (noisy) sound is the same as the intensity
of the near (informative) sound, the devised sound attentuation system will suppress
the far sound in comparison with the near sound at the ratio of the two distances
and the greater the distance to the far sound source relative to the distance to the
near sound source, the stronger the attenuation or suppression.
[0016] In practice, a source of sound may be considered to be at a far distance if the distance
between the sound pick up elements of the microphone devices is 8 to 10 times smaller
than the length of the sound waves. Hence, if, e.g., microphone devices are of the
type described hereinbefore, wherein, the sound pick up elements of the microphone
devices, each having a diameter of about 3 mm, sound arriving from all directions
from sources as close as 1 meter and having frequencies up to 10 KHz, will be cancelled.
[0017] Referring to Fig. 2, there is illustrated a characteristic curve of a sound intensity
vs. distance from sources of sound, depicted in relation to the microphone devices
of the type according to the present invention.
[0018] As seen, the sound waves originate at a mouth of a speaker, distant a short distance
therefrom, i.e., the sounds originate at a close distance from the microphone devices.
The speaker's voice at the near field has the characteristic of a spherical field,
as depicted by the spherical curves. Other prevailing sounds, originating at far greater
distances and regarded as far field sounds, possess characteristics of a plane field.
Hence, while the sound intensity of the spherical waves are substantially the same
along the sphere's surface or envelope and changes along the sphere's radius, this
is not the case with a plane field. In the latter case the sound intensity is substantially
the same on all points of the plane.
[0019] Referring to Fig. 3, there is seen that when the microphone devices 2 and 4, each
having a membrane 5, are placed in close proximity to each other at a distance ΔL,
where L is the distance from a source of sound, then the sound intensities I
2 and I
4 respectively, in each microphone device are:

where

hence

[0020] Since the desired sound originates at the speaker's mouth and the sound waves or
pressure change from point to point along the radius of the acoustical spherical field,
a barrier 14 (Fig. 4) placed across the acoustical wave travel path and located between
the two microphone devices 2 and 4, will increase the difference between the output
signals of the microphone devices, thereby improving the sound to noise ratio. Thus,
as seen in Fig. 4, the barrier 14 in the form of a small and thin plate, disc, or
the like element, affixed in between the two microphone devices 2 and 4, increase
the difference in the sound intensities picked up by each microphone device.
[0021] Referring now to Figs. 5a to 5e, there are illustrated a plurality of possible relative
dispositions of the pair of microphone devices with respect to each other, while maintaining
close proximal relationship between their active sound pick up elements, e.g., membranes.
As seen in Fig. 5a, the microphone devices 2 and 4 are disposed with the plane of
their membranes substantially parallel with respect to each other. In Fig. 5b, the
microphone devices are also disposed with their membranes 5 substantially at the same
plane, however, the microphone devices are oppositely oriented. In Fig. 5c, the microphone
devices 2 and 4 are disposed along the same axis with their membranes 5 in close proximity
to each other, but in opposite directions. Seen in Fig. 5d are the microphone devices
2 and 4 disposed with their axis at the same plane, however, at an angle with respect
to each other, while the membranes 5 are disposed in close proximity to each other.
Finally, in Fig. 5e there are seen the two microphone devices 2 and 4, under a common
housing, namely, having two separate membranes 5 enveloped in a single housing.
[0022] Similar to the embodiment shown in Fig. 4, in order to increase the difference in
the intensities picked up by each of the pair of microphone devices, a barrier is
affixed onto the devices in a disposition suitable to the relative dispositions of
the microphone devices. As seen, the barrier 14 can be affixed in a plane traversing
the plane of the two microphone membranes 5 (Fig. 6a); in a plane parallel to and
in between the pair of membranes 5 (Fig. 6b); in a plane parallel to the two membranes
5 (Fig. 6c), or in a plane traversing the planes of the membranes 5 and in between
the two membranes (Fig. 6d).
[0023] The more detailed structure of preferred microphone devices according to the present
invention are illustrated in Figs. 7 to 10. In Fig. 7 there are shown a pair of microphone
devices 2 and 4 composed of a two-part housing 20,22 and 24,26, respectively. Interposed
between the housing parts is a membrane 5 dividing the interior of the housing into
two spaces or chambers 28,30 and 32,34, respectively. The housing parts 20 and 24
are provided with members 36, 38 serving as mounts for an optical guide 40,42 leading
to light sources 44 and 46. Similarly, there are provided light guides 48,50 leading
to light detectors 52,54. The light guides 40,48 and respectively 42,50, each have
an end portion affixed in members 36 and 38 and slightly protruding into chambers
30,34. These end portions have an axis and a rim and are disposed with respect to
each other to include an angle between the axes and each of the light guide rims is
cut at an angle with respect to the axis of its light guide. For further description
of the structure and operation of each microphone device, attention is directed to
Israel Patent Specification No. 111,913, the teachings of which are herein incorporated
by reference.
[0024] Further seen in Fig. 7 are the different distances d
1 and d
2 at which the rims of light guides of each microphone device is spaced-apart from
its membrane 5. It can thus be understood that upon operation, when sound waves impinge
upon the membranes 5, in the direction of arrow A, the latter bulges into chambers
30,34 as depicted by the broken lines. Referring now also to Fig. 8 it is noted that
whereas the light intensity in microphone device 2 is increased by ΔI as the sound
wave is picked up by the device, and the membrane 5 is moved by a distance d, for
the same movement of the membrane 5 in device 4, the light intensity I
2 is decreased. The output signals from devices 2 and 4 are thus fed to an operational
amplifier. This type of an arrangement may also be utilized with the two optical microphone
devices in which the membrane 5 is equally distant from the rims of the light guides.
In this case, the output signals have to be processed by means of an electronic circuit
shown in Fig. 1, for summing up of the respective signals, producing an improved signal
having a higher signal to noise ratio.
[0025] Instead of utilizing two light sources and two light intensity detectors as shown
in the embodiment of Fig. 7, it is more efficient to utilize a single light source
56 and a single light intensity detector 58, as shown in Fig. 9. Hence, both microphone
devices 2 and 4 are optically connected to a single light source and a single light
intensity detector.
[0026] Similarly, in a modification of the embodiment of Fig. 9, in Fig. 10 it can be seen
how the ouput light guide 48 of the microphone device 2 is utilized as an input light
source via light guide 42 of the microphone device 4, thereby requiring only a single
light source 60 and a single light intensity detector 62.
[0027] Fig. 11 illustrates a still further modification in which the two microphone devices
2 and 4 share a single membrane 5. The member 66 on which light guides 68 and 70 lead,
respectively, to a light source 72 and a light detector 74. Since the single membrane
5 is exposed at both of its surfaces to the incoming sound waves and designed to be
substantially equal (by virtue of the configurations of the housings of the devices),
when the membrane 5 of the microphone devices are oriented with respect to the travelling
sound waves to traverse the direction of travel, the difference between the sound
wave pressures upon the two sides of the membrane 5 will be optically detected by
the system, thereby improving the signal to noise ratio as explained hereinbefore.
[0028] It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited
to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention
may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential
attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all
respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated
by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which
come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended
to be embraced therein.
1. A noise attenuation system for use with sound receiving devices, comprising:
first and second relatively small optical microphone devices having at least one sound
responsive membrane operative to produce an output signal in accordance with sound
waves picked up by said microphone devices;
at least one pair of light guides affixed to said first or second microphone devices;
said pair of light guides each having an input end portion and an output end portion;
the input end portion of a first light guide being connectable to a source of light
and the output end portion of said second light guide being connectable to a light
intensity detecting means;
each of the output portion of said first light guide and input end portion of said
second light guide having an axis and a rim and being oriented with respect to each
other to include an angle between said axes, and each of said light guide rims being
cut at an angle with respect to the axis of its light guide,
wherein, in operation, the intensity of light reflected by said membrane and detected
by said light intensity measuring means, represents sound intensities picked up by
said first and second microphone devices or the differences between said intensities.
2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein there are provided two optical microphone
devices at least indirectly coupled in close proximity to each other, so as to diminish
the effective distance thereinbetween, and each microphone device leading to a signal
subtraction circuit for effecting the substraction of said first signal from said
second signal, to produce a third, output signal.
3. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said first and second optical microphone
devices comprise a membrane and said microphone devices are coupled to each other
with said membranes substantially located in a single plane.
4. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said first and second optical microphone
devices comprise a membrane and said microphone devices are coupled to each other
with said membranes substantially located in different planes.
5. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said membranes as mounted in said optical
microphone devices are disposed in opposite directions with respect to each other.
6. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said optical microphone devices are disposed
with their axes at the same plane, but at an angle with respect to each other.
7. The system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a partition disposed between
said first and second optical microphone devices.
8. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rims of said input and output portions
of the light guides in each of said microphone devices are located at a different
distance from the membrane when in rest, whereby, in operation, upon said membrane
in the first microphone optical device approaching said rims, the reflected light
intensity is increased and the movement of the membrane in a direction away from said
rims causes a decrease in the detected light, and upon said membrane in the second
optical microphone device approaching said rims, the reflected light intensity is
decreased and the movement of the membrane in a direction away from the rims, causes
an increase in the detected light.
9. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first optical microphone device producing
in its output light modulated in phase with surrounding sound waves, said second optical
microphone device producing in its output light modulated out of phase with surrounding
sound waves, both outputs being connected to said light intensity detecting means
to sum up said output signals for producing a third signal, having a signal to noise
ratio higher than that in each of said first and second microphone devices.
10. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the pair of light guides of said first and
second optical microphone devices are connectable to the same source of light and
the same light intensity detecting means.
11. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein one of said pair of light guides of the
first and second microphone devices are optically interconnected so that in operation
the light reflected by the membrane of the first microphone device and directed into
the input end portion of the associated light guide, serves as a source of light to
the second microphone device.
12. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein there are provided two optically microphone
devices sharing a single membrane, and, in operation, said membrane is oriented with
its surfaces traversing the direction of travel of sound waves to be picked up, whereby
the difference of sound intensities picked up by the microphone devices are optically
detected.