[0001] The present invention relates to a process of producing a higher degree of olefin
oligomerization.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Synthetic lubricants produced by the oligomerization of alpha-olefins are well-known.
The nature of the alpha-olefin from which these oligomers are produced prescribes
the properties of the resultant lubricant.
[0003] While it has been reported that even fairly large amounts of internal or branched-chain
olefins may be present without extremely adverse effect on the alpha-olefin oligomerization,
the resultant lubricants have restricted utility and do not justify their usage as
a replacement for naturally occurring petroleum fluids.
[0004] In general, linear olefins of from eight to twelve carbons have proven most effective.
Normal alpha-olefins are generally preferred.
[0005] Oligomerization may be achieved with a wide variety of catalysts. Representative
catalyst include such Friedel-Crafts agents as AlCl
3, AlBr
3, BF
3, BCl
3, GaCl
4, and the like. Although each such agent facilitates oligomerization, the activity
of the catalyst will differ widely. The very active catalyst, such as AlCl
3, will produce extremely high molecular weight polymers in conjunction with use of
appropriate promoters. Other Friedel-Craft catalysts, such as SnCl
4 or GaCl
3 may present disposal problems after use. Moreover, solid catalysts present difficulties
with respect to control of the exothermic oligomerization reaction due to the heterogeneous
nature of the reaction system.
[0006] A preferred catalyst has been boron trifluoride (BF
3), which forms a liquid complex with the necessary promoters, and thus lends itself
to conventional reaction systems.
[0007] Boron trifluoride and the other catalysts must be used in combination with a promoter.
The promoter complexes with the BF
3 and, in so doing, provides an activated system needed for initiation of the oligomerization
reaction. Among the most widely used promoters are the alkanoic and/or inorganic acids
which are suitable for selective formation of oligomers ranging from two to four monomeric
units.
[0008] Conventional practice for conducting the oligomerization reaction has been to admix
the promoter with the monomeric olefin in the presence of an imposed atmosphere of
BF
3, which is normally gaseous. The presence of excess BF
3 necessary for the reaction is delineated by the observed pressure of BF
3 in the reaction vessel.
[0009] The rate of oligomerization is related to some degree to the BF
3 pressure, since the probability of excess BF
3 in the liquid reactants is directly related to its pressure.
[0010] The use of a variety of alcohols as promoters is disclosed by Shubkin in U.S. Patent
No. 3,780,128 entitled "Synthetic Lubricants by Oligomerization and Hydrogenation."
There is no discussion on the pros and cons of the various alcohols, but the preferred
alcohol is propanol.
[0011] The use of variety of alcohols as promoters is also disclosed by Cupples et al. in
U.S. Patent No. 4,045,508 entitled "Method of Making Alpha-Olefin Oligomers," but
that reference does not discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of each
promoter.
[0012] A two-step process using a mixture propanol and hexanol is disclosed by Pratt in
U.S. Patent No. 4,587,368 entitled "Process for Producing Lubricant Material," where
an aliquot of monomer is added to an intermediate oligomer. Example 2 shows that a
75:25 mixture of hexanol and propanol leads to a heavier product than a 50:50 mixture
of hexanol and propanol
[0013] U.S. Patent Nos. 3,780,128; 4,045,508; and 4,587,368 are hereby incorporated by reference
for all purposes.
[0014] The subsequent refining processes can be modified to yield particular product compositions.
Where, for example, a lubricant consisting chiefly of higher oligomers is desired,
one may remove unreacted monomer and low boiling dimer by distillation at atmospheric
pressure. Trimer has also been removed in this manner, but through conditions of high
vacuum distillation.
[0015] After hydrogenation, the substantially saturated lubricant material is then ready
for compounding. Depending upon its composition and properties, it may be used directly
in a wide variety of known applications. Alternatively, known lubricant additives
may be incorporated. The material may be mixed with other available lubricants, to
achieve the characteristics necessary for given conventional utilities.
[0016] Products of many of these known oligomerization reactions have been primarily designed
for specialized applications. Aircraft hydraulic or turbine oils, for example, possess
low viscosity requirements requiring oligomerization limited to dimers, trimers and
tetramers (with emphasis on the trimer). Polymers resulting from such a procedure,
however, have limited application as conventional lubricants. Lubricants for higher
temperature, e.g., motor oils and industrial lubricants use, require considerably
higher viscosities.
[0017] In general, higher viscosity fluids can only be made with a severe production rate
penalty, since longer residence times are required to achieve the target viscosity
with current technology.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0018] The present invention provides a process for producing a high degree of olefin oligomerization.
We have found that the oligomer distribution can be affected by the size of the primary
alcohol that is used as promoter. A higher degree of oligomerization can be achieved
by increasing the carbon to hydroxyl ratio for alcohol promoters. Moreover, we have
also found that by using longer straight chain alcohols, we can produce a heavier
product viscosity with greater BF
3 efficiency.
[0019] In our process, a synthetic lubricant material is produced by oligomerizing a C
8-16 α-olefin monomer in the presence of a boron trifluoride catalyst and a straight-chain
alcohol promoter, wherein substantially all of the alcohol promoter has a carbon number
of at least four, and at least 80 wt.% of the alcohol promoter has a carbon number
of at least five.
[0020] Preferably, the olefinic monomer contains predominately 10 to 12 carbon atoms.
[0021] Preferably, substantially all of the alcohol promoter has a carbon number of at least
five, and least 80 wt.% of the alcohol promoter has a carbon number of at least six.
Most preferably, the alcohol promoter is 1-hexanol.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0022] In order to assist the understanding of this invention, reference will now be made
to the appended drawings. The drawings are exemplary only, and should not be construed
as limiting the invention.
[0023] The Figure shows the effect of longer chain alcohols on the oligomer distribution
of the product. It shows the data from Examples 6 through 8 and Comparative Example
B.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0024] In its broadest aspect, the present invention involves the oligomerization of an
olefinic monomer by contacting that monomer with boron trifluoride and a straight-chain
alcohol promoter. Substantially all of the alcohol promoter has a carbon number of
at least four, at least 80 wt.% of the alcohol promoter has a carbon number of at
least five.
OLEFINIC MONOMER
[0025] The olefins used in making the oligomer are predominately (at least 50 mole %) C
8-C
16 straight-chain, mono-olefinically unsaturated hydrocarbons in which the olefinic
unsaturation occurs at the 1- or α-position of the straight carbon chain. Straight-chain
α-olefins are used because they are more reactive and commercially available. Such
α-olefins can be made by the thermal cracking of paraffinic hydrocarbons or by the
well known Ziegler ethylene chain growth and displacement on triethyl aluminum. Individual
olefins may be used, as well as mixtures of such olefins. Examples of such olefins
are 1-octene, 1-decene, 1-dodecene, 1-hexadecene and 1-tetradecene. The preferred
normal α-olefin monomers are those containing about 10 to 12 carbon atoms. The olefin
monomers can also contain minor amounts of up to about 50 mole %, and usually less
than 25 mole %, of internal olefins and vinylidene olefins.
OLIGOMERIZATION REACTION
[0026] The alcohol promoter can be either a single straight-chain alcohol or a mixture of
straight-chain alcohols. Examples of preferable single alcohols are 1-pentanol, 1-hexanol,
1-octanol, 1-decanol, 1-dodecanol, and 1-tetradecanol. Most preferably, the alcohol
promoter is 1-hexanol.
[0027] Substantially all of the alcohol promoter has a carbon number of at least four, and
at least 80 wt.% of the alcohol promoter should have a carbon number of at least five.
In other words, the promoter should have no ethanol or propanol, and should have no
more than 20% butanol.
[0028] Preferably, substantially all of the alcohol promoter has a carbon number of at five,
and at least 80 wt.% of the alcohol promoter should have a carbon number of at least
six. In other words, the promoter preferably should have no ethanol, propanol, or
butanol and should have no more than 20% pentanol.
[0029] The alcohol promoter is used in minor but effective amounts. For example, the total
amount of alcohol promoter used can be from about 0.001 to 0.04 moles per mole of
monomer (0.1 to 4.0 mole percent). In general, the boron trifluoride is used in molar
excess to the amount of promoter. This can be accomplished by using a closed reactor
and maintaining a positive boron trifluoride pressure over the reaction mixture.
[0030] The alcohol can be mixed with the olefin feed and the reaction can be carried out
in a batch or continuous process at temperatures of about 0° to 200° C and pressures
ranging from atmospheric up to, for example, 1,000 psig. The reaction temperature
will change the oligomer distribution, with increasing temperatures favoring the production
of dimers. Preferred reaction temperatures and pressures are about 20° to 90° C and
5 to 100 psig.
[0031] When a desired oligomer distribution is reached, the reaction is terminated by venting
off excess boron trifluoride gas and purging with nitrogen gas to replace all boron
trifluoride gaseous residue. The reaction product, unreacted monomer, and boron trifluoride-promoter
complex residue are removed from the reactor for further processing. The reactor product
is then washed with an aqueous caustic solution and followed by several water washes
to ensure neutralization.
[0032] The oligomer mixture from the reaction contains monomer, which can be removed by
distillation. The monomer has been found to contain appreciable amounts of less reactive,
isomerized material. However, this monomer can be recycled because it will react to
form oligomers in the presence of fresh α-olefin monomer. For example, portions of
up to about 25 wt. %, and preferably 5 to 15 wt. % recycled monomer, based on total
monomer, can be mixed with fresh monomer. The product mixture can be further separated
by distillation to provide one or more product fractions having the desired viscosities
for use in various lubricant applications such as drilling, hydraulic or metal working
fluids, gear oils and crankcase lubricants.
[0033] The oligomer product can be hydrogenated by conventional methods to increase the
oxidation stability of the product. Supported nickel catalysts are useful. For example,
nickel on a Kieselguhr support gives good results. Batch or continuous processes can
be used. For example, the catalyst can be added to the liquid and stirred under hydrogen
pressure or the liquid may be trickled through a fixed bed of the supported catalyst
under hydrogen pressure. Hydrogen pressures of about 100 to 1,000 psig at temperatures
of about 150° to 300° C are especially useful.
EXAMPLES
[0034] The invention will be further illustrated by following examples, which set forth
particularly advantageous method embodiments. While the Examples are provided to illustrate
the present invention, they are not intended to limit it.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE A
BF3:1-BUTANOL BATCH PROCESS
[0035] The oligomerization reaction was carried out in an autoclave reactor equipped with
a packless stirrer; and all wetted surfaces were made of 316 stainless steel. The
reactor had an external electrical heater and an internal cooling coil for temperature
control. The reactor was equipped with a dip tube, gas inlet and vent valves, and
a pressure relief rupture disc. Prior to the monomer charge, the reactor was cleaned,
purged with nitrogen and tested for leaks.
[0036] One thousand grams of 1-decene was charged into the reactor. The promoter, 1-butanol,
was added to a concentration of 3.2 mole % based on feed. The entire reactor content
was under vacuum. Boron trifluoride gas was then sparged slowly with agitation and
controlled at 30° C via a cooling coil to avoid reactor temperature overrun. Additional
boron trifluoride was added as necessary to maintain a reactor pressure of 60 psig.
The reaction was terminated after two hours by venting off excess boron trifluoride
gas and purging with nitrogen. The reaction product was then washed with a 4 wt. %
aqueous sodium hydroxide solution followed by several water washes to ensure neutralization.
The product was saved for further treatments such as hydrogenation and fractionation.
EXAMPLES 1 THROUGH 5
EFFECT OF LONGER CHAIN ALCOHOLS IN BATCH MODE
[0037] In these examples the following alcohols are substituted one at a time for the n-butanol
promoter employed in Comparative Example A and the rest of the procedure of Comparative
Example A was carried through in the same manner.
(1) n-hexanol
(2) n-octanol
(3) n-decanol
(4) n-dodecanol
(5) n-tetradecanol
Table 1.
Effects of Longer Chain Alcohols on 100°C Kinematic Viscosity (1 Hour Batch Reactions) |
Example |
Type of Promoter |
Percent Monomer |
Percent Dimer |
Trimer+ Calculated Viscosity |
A |
n-butanol |
2.67 |
6.74 |
5.66 |
1 |
n-hexanol |
3.30 |
12.36 |
5.83 |
2 |
n-octanol |
1.58 |
14.12 |
6.21 |
3 |
n-decanol |
2.85 |
13.82 |
6.40 |
4 |
n-dodecanol |
3.41 |
13.51 |
6.30 |
5 |
n-tetradecanol |
2.91 |
12.06 |
6.46 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE B
BF3:1-BUTANOL IN CONTINUOUS PRODUCTION MODE
[0038] The continuous monomer feed reactor was equipped with monomer, promoter and gas inlet
ports, vent valves, and a pressure relief rupture disc. At the onset of oligomerization
reaction, the reactor was cleaned, purged with nitrogen and tested for leaks. A 1-dodecene
monomer flow rate of 2000 grams per hour, a reactor temperature of 30°C and a reactor
pressure of 60 psig were controlled throughout the reaction period. The reactor had
a gas cap and its liquid volume was controlled through a level control device and
approximately one half of the reactor volume. A preformed BF
3:n-butanol complex was added at a concentration of 0.3 mole % based on feed. The reaction
product was discharged to a low pressure flash tank to remove the gaseous reactant.
The liquid product stream was then subjected to neutralization and washing steps.
The product was saved for further treatments such as hydrogenation and fractionation.
EXAMPLES 6 THROUGH 8
EFFECT OF LONGER CHAIN ALCOHOLS IN CONTINUOUS MODE
[0039] In these examples the following alcohols are substituted one at a time for the n-butanol
promoter employed in Comparative Example B and the rest of the procedure of Comparative
Example B was carried through in the same manner.
(6) n-hexanol
(7) n-octanol
(8) n-decanol
Table 2.
Effects of Longer Chain Alcohols on 100°C Kinematic Viscosity for Continuous Production |
Example |
% Monomer |
% Dimer |
Trimer+ Calculated Viscosity |
B |
0.3 |
1.0 |
6.88 |
6 |
1.3 |
2.1 |
7.76 |
7 |
4.0 |
5.0 |
8.12 |
8 |
6.6 |
6.9 |
8.19 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES C THROUGH G
EFFECT OF MIXED ALCOHOLS
[0040] In these examples the following alcohols are substituted one at a time for the n-butanol
promoter employed in Comparative Example A and the rest of the procedure of Comparative
Example A carried through in the same manner.
(C) n-propanol
(D) 2.30 mole % n-propanol and 0.77 mole % n-hexanol
(E) 0.77 mole % n-propanol and 2.30 mole % n-hexanol
(F) 2.30 mole % n-butanol and 0.77 mole % n-hexanol
(G) 0.77 mole % n-butanol and 2.30 mole % n-hexanol
Table 3
Mixed Alcohols with n-Hexanol (1 Hour Batch Reactions) |
Example |
Type of Lighter Alcohol |
Ratio Lighter Alcohol to Hexanol |
Percent Monomer |
Percent Dimer |
Trimer+ Calculated Viscosity |
C |
n-propanol1 |
- |
1.84 |
9.71 |
5.37 |
D |
n-propanol |
75:25 |
2.83 |
11.98 |
5.26 |
E |
n-propanol |
25:75 |
3.81 |
12.91 |
5.39 |
|
A |
n-butanol1 |
- |
2.67 |
6.74 |
5.66 |
F |
n-butanol |
75:25 |
2.58 |
12.82 |
5.20 |
G |
n-butanol |
25:75 |
2.56 |
12.75 |
5.44 |
|
1 |
n-hexanol |
- |
3.30 |
12.36 |
5.83 |
[0041] Table 3 shows the results of mixtures of alcohols as promotors on the calculated
100° C kinematic viscosity of the trimer and higher oligomers. As this invention teaches,
n-hexanol gives a heavier product than n-butanol, which in turn produces a heavier
product than n-propanol. One would expect that mixtures would produce products with
viscosities bounded by that which is produced from the pure alcohols (i.e., propanol
and hexanol). However, this data shows that mixtures produce lower viscosities than
that produced by the lighter of the two alcohols. For example, a 25:75 mixture of
propanol:hexanol gives a product viscosity of less than that produced by propanol
alone. Butanol and hexanol mixtures behave in a similar manner.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE H AND EXAMPLES 9 AND 10
EFFECT OF LONGER CHAINED ALCOHOLS ON BF3 CONSUMPTION
[0042] In Comparative Example H, n-butanol was substituted as the promoter for the promoter
complex employed in Comparative Example B. Furthermore, the feed was 1-decene instead
of 1-dodecene, the BF
3 pressure was 80 psig and the mole % promoter was 2.21. The rest of the procedure
was carried through in the same manner as Comparative Example B.
[0043] In Examples 9 and 10, n-hexanol was substituted for the n-butanol promoter used in
Comparative Example H. In Example 9, 1.63 mole % of n-hexanol was used and in Example
10, 2.24 mole % of n-hexanol was used. The rest of the procedure was carried through
in the same manner as Comparative Example H.
Table 4
BF3 Consumption |
Example |
Type of Promoter |
Mole % Promoter of Feed |
Trimer+ Calculated Viscosity cSt |
BF3 wt% of Feed |
H |
n-butanol |
2.21 |
8.5 |
1.16 |
9 |
n-hexanol |
1.63 |
8.3 |
0.92 |
10 |
n-hexanol |
2.24 |
9.6 |
1.17 |
[0044] Table 4 shows the effect of n-hexanol as compared to n-butanol in producing near
equivalent product viscosity with a savings of the amount of BF
3 consumed. Comparative Example H and Example 9 show that if n-hexanol is used instead
of n-butanol, a 8.3 cSt product can be produced with about 20% savings in BF
3. Conversely, a 9.5 cSt can be produced with near equivalent use of BF
3 by using n-hexanol instead of n-butanol at equivalent mole % of the promoter.
[0045] While the present invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments,
this application is intended to cover those various changes and substitutions that
may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope
of the appended claims.