[0001] This invention relates to zinc phosphate-based conversion treatment baths which can
be applied to a variety of metal substrates, for example, steel, steel sheet, glavanized
steel sheet, and the like. More particularly, this invention relates to a zinc phosphate-based
conversion bath and to a surface treatment method that are able to form a fine, dense,
and uniform conversion coating on metal surfaces and that are also able to induce
fine-crystal formation in the conversion coating.
[0002] The execution of a zinc phosphate-based conversion treatment on various metals prior
to the coating or plastic working thereof is known at present for the purpose of improving
the paint adherence and post-paint corrosion resistance and improving the lubrication
during plastic working.
[0003] The conversion treatment baths used for zinc phosphate-based conversion treatment
are essentially acidic aqueous solutions that contain zinc ions, phosphate ions, and
oxidizing agent(s). Nitrite salts, chlorate salts, hydrogen peroxide, organic nitro
compounds, hydroxylamine, and the like, are ordinarily considered for this oxidizing
agent. These oxidizing agents are typically called conversion "accelerators" because
they function to accelerate the conversion reactions. Nitrate salts may be present
in conversion baths, but - because, in the concentrations usually present in zinc
phosphate-based conversion baths, nitrate ions do not exercise an oxidizing activity
sufficient to convert ferrous ions substantially completely to ferric ions - nitrate
ions must be distinguished from the conversion accelerators.
[0004] One important role of conversion accelerators during the zinc phosphate based conversion
treatment of ferriferous metals is to oxidise the divalent iron ions eluting into
the conversion bath to trivalent iron ions. For example, the conversion reactions
are inhibited when divalent iron ions accumulate in the conversion bath during the
continuous conversion treatment of ferriferous metals, and the role of the conversion
accelerator in inhibiting this accumulation of divalent iron ions is thus crucial.
[0005] However, each of these already known conversion accelerators is associated with problems
that must be addressed. For example, in the case of the nitrite salts, which are the
most widely used conversion accelerators at the present time, these compounds are
unstable in the acid region. As a result, these compounds undergo spontaneous decomposition
and are thereby consumed even when conversion treatment is not being run (storage
period). The maintenance of a constant or prescribed concentration of these compounds
therefore requires continual replenishment to make up for the amount lost to this
consumption. It is also known that as a result of their oxidative activity and spontaneous
decomposition these nitrite salts partially convert to NO
x gas, which diffuses into and pollutes the atmosphere.
[0006] When chlorate salts are used as conversion accelerators, chloride ions are produced
as a decomposition product during conversion treatment and accumulate in the conversion
treatment bath. The corrosion resistance of the metal substrate is substantially impaired
when even a trace of chloride ions from the conversion treatment bath remains on the
surface of the metal workpiece. In addition, chlorate salts are ordinarily used in
combination with another conversion accelerator, such as nitrite salts, and when used
alone provide only a significantly reduced conversion reaction rate.
[0007] Stability in the conversion treatment bath is also a problem for the use of hydrogen
peroxide as a conversion accelerator: Hydrogen peroxide is readily decomposed by oxygen
dissolved in the conversion bath. In addition, hydrogen peroxide has a narrow optimal
concentration range for conversion treatment, which makes it difficult to manage the
conversion treatment bath. When the dissolved concentration is too high, a powdery,
poorly adherent conversion coating is deposited on the metal surface.
[0008] French Patent Specification No. 2,410,055 concerns the use of hydrogen peroxide as
a conversion accelerator in a zinc phosphate conversion coating bath but although
mention is made of a peroxide precursor, this is not illustrated. GB Patent Specification
No. 828,916 mentions the use of a large range of oxidants including hydrogen peroxide
and t-butyl peroxide.
[0009] With regard to the use of nitrogenous organic compounds as conversion accelerators,
the following problems are associated with the use of organic nitro compounds such
as nitroguanine and sodium m-nitrobenzenesulfonate: Nitroguanine, for example, has
a low solubility in water and as a result cannot be formulated as a concentrate for
addition to the conversion bath. It is also difficult to control the divalent iron
ions concentration in the conversion bath using nitroguanine because this compound
has a weak capacity to oxidize the divalent iron ions. On the other hand, sodium m-nitrobenzenesulfonate
provides a poor conversion performance when used by itself, and for this reason this
compound must ordinarily be used in combination with another, more powerful conversion
accelerator. Moreover, its concentration management requires the use of large-scale
measurement equipment, such as an ion chromatograph. Another problem with the use
of organic nitro compounds is that the accumulation of these compounds and their decomposition
products in the conversion bath causes an increase in the chemical oxygen demand ("COD")
of the conversion treatment effluent, which unfavorably affects the environment.
[0010] Hydroxylamine compounds are another type of nitrogenous organic compounds used as
conversion accelerators. These compounds, however, in order to achieve the best results,
must be added to give concentrations of at least 1,000 parts per million by weight
(hereinafter usually abbreviated as "ppm") in the conversion bath, giving rise to
the possibility of a large and economically undesirable consumption of the conversion
accelerator.
[0011] In addition, results have been reported from an investigation into the use of chromic
acid and permanganate salts as conversion accelerators for zinc phosphate-based conversion
treatment baths (Norio Sato, et al.,
Boshoku Gijutsu [English title: Corrosion Engineering], Volume 15, No. 5 (1966)). These authors report
that the formation of conversion coatings was not observed at concentrations of 5
millimoles per liter (hereinafter usually abbreviated as "mmol/L") or 10 mmol/L.
[0012] Many of the known conversion accelerators as described above are nitrogenous compounds,
and as such resist removal by chemical wastewater treatment techniques, so that in
practice they are usually removed through microbiological treatments. However, even
with the use of microbiological treatments, the elimination of high concentrations
of these nitrogenous compounds is highly problematic, while a complete elimination
cannot be achieved even at low concentrations. Nitrogenous compounds have recently
come to be thought of as one factor in the eutrophication of bodies of water, and
the discharge of nitrogenous compounds has therefore become subject to an increasingly
strict regulatory atmosphere. In view of these environmental considerations, the development
of a nitrogenous compound-free zinc phosphate-based conversion bath would be highly
desirable.
[0013] Another drawback to each of the above-described conversion accelerators is that,
in order to obtain the thin, uniform, fine, and dense conversion coatings desired
as underpaint coatings, the metal surface must in each case be conditioned by treatment
with a colloidal titanium system immediately prior to execution of the conversion
treatment. In addition to the fact that treatment bath management is quite complicated
in the case of surface conditioners, a surface-conditioning step also requires installation
of the corresponding treatment facilities and expansion of the space devoted to treatment.
As a result, strong demand has recently appeared for the development of a conversion
accelerator that is able to from high-quality conversion coatings on metal surfaces
even without the implementation of a surface-conditioning step.
[0014] The present invention seeks to solve the problems described above for conversion
accelerators. More specifically, the present invention introduces a zinc phosphate-based
conversion bath for metals and a metal surface treatment method which are able to
deposit a fine, dense, and uniform zinc phosphate-type conversion coating on the surface
of the metal substrate and which are able to induce fine-crystal formation in the
conversion coating.
[0015] As a consequence of investigations focusing on organic peroxides within the realm
of organic oxidizing agents, the inventors discovered that fine, dense, and uniform
zinc phosphate-type conversion coatings can be formed through the use of organic peroxides
soluble in the conversion bath as conversion accelerators. The following discoveries
were also made: organic peroxide conversion accelerators need not be used in combination
with nitrate salts or another conversion accelerator and thereby make possible the
elimination of nitrogenous compounds from the conversion bath; the use of organic
peroxide conversion accelerators yields fine, dense, and uniform crystals in the coating
even without the application of a surface-conditioning treatment; and the use of organic
peroxide conversion accelerators results in the formation of high-quality conversion
coatings on metal substrates without being subject to narrow limitations of temperature,
zinc concentration and the like. The present invention was developed as a result of
these discoveries.
[0016] Accordingly, the invention provides an acidic aqueous phosphate conversion-coating
composition for treating metal surfaces, which composition comprises water, 0.5 to
1.3 g/l zinc ions, 5 to 30 g/l phosphate ions and 50 to 1,500 ppm organic peroxide(s)
as a conversion accelerator and which composition has a free acidity of 0.1 to 0.9
points.
[0017] Since nitrogenous compounds are not included among the essential components of conversion
baths according to the present invention, treatment baths according to the present
invention can also satisfy environmental regulations concerning the amount of nitrogenous
compound in the effluent. One should note in this connection that there is very little
risk of environmental damage when the nitrogen concentration in a conversion treatment
bath is less than or equal to 20 ppm.
[0018] It is preferred to contact the metal surface with the above-described zinc phosphate-based
conversion treatment bath according to the present invention after the pH of the conversion
bath has been adjusted to 2.0 to 4.0, more preferably 2.5 to 3.5.
[0019] The described zinc phosphate-based surface treatment according to the invention method
is preferably carried out by subjecting the preliminary degreased surface of the metal
to a water rinse and consecutively thereafter to the conversion treatment.
[0020] The treatment is preferably carried out by contacting the metal surface with the
aqueous conversion coating composition at a treatment temperature of from room temperature
up to 90°C and for a period of time in the range of from 30 seconds to 15 minutes.
[0021] The appropriate range for zinc ions concentration in a bath according to the invention
will vary as a function of the service intended for the conversion coating produced.
[0022] When the conversion treatment bath according to the present invention is to be used
to provide an underpaint coating for metals and the zinc ions concentration falls
below 0.5 g/L, the resulting zinc phosphate-type conversion coating will exhibit a
reduced coverage ratio, which can cause an unsatisfactory post-paint coating adherence
and an unsatisfactory post-paint corrosion resistance. Zinc ions concentrations in
excess cause a coarsening of the crystals in the coating, which can in particular
cause a reduced post-paint coating adherence.
[0023] The phosphate ions concentration in the conversion bath according to the present
invention is preferably 5.0 to 30.0 g/L. Obtaining a normal conversion coating can
become problematic at below 5.0 g/L. No additional benefits are obtained at above
30.0 g/L, which makes such values uneconomical. The phosphate ions can be generated
by the addition of phosphoric acid or its aqueous solutions to the conversion bath
or by dissolving a salt of phosphoric acid, such as the sodium potassium, magnesium,
zinc, or the like salt, in a conversion bath.
[0024] The zinc phosphate-based conversion treatment bath according to the present invention
is an acidic aqueous solution whose pH preferably is from 2.0 to 4.0 and more preferably
from about 2.5 to 3.5. In this pH region, orthophosphoric acid (H
3PO
4) exists in equilibrium primarily with dihydrogen phosphate ions (H
2PO
4), but also with much smaller amounts of hydrogen phosphate ions (HPO
4-2) and phosphate ions (PO
43-); however, the concentrations specified herein and those of "phosphate ions" are
intended to include the stoichiometric equivalent as phosphate ions of any of the
chemical species from undissociated orthophosphoric acid to completely ionized phosphate
ions. The free acid content, measured as described in the examples below, of the compositions
according to the invention is at least, with increasing preference in the order given,
0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 0.6 point and independently is not more than 0.9 point(s).
[0025] The organic peroxides used by the present invention can be classified into, for example,
organoperoxides, such as ethyl hydroperoxides, isopropyl hydroperoxide, tert-butyl
hydroperoxide, tert-hexyl hydroperoxide, diethyl peroxide, tert-butyl peroxymaleate,
and the like, that contain a peroxy moiety without an adjacent carbonyl group; and
percarboxylic acid types such as peracetic acid, monoperphthalic acid, persuccinic
acid, and the like.
[0026] Organic peroxide molecules are used at concentrations of 50 to 1,500 ppm in a conversion
bath according to the invention. Acceleration of conversion film formation can become
unsatisfactory when the organoperoxide concentration in the conversion bath is below
50 ppm. Accordingly, the organic peroxide molecules present in the conversion bath
according to the present invention preferably contain C
1 to C
7 alkyl moieties, because a low water solubility is exhibited by organic peroxides
containing aromatic or higher molecular weight alkyl moieties, and this can result
in a failure to obtain a satisfactory oxidizing activity. On the other hand, no additional
effect is obtained at concentrations in excess of 1,500 ppm, and such values are therefore
uneconomical.
[0027] Because the conversion treatment bath according to the present invention also functions
to induce fine-crystal formation on the part of the depositing zinc phosphate-type
crystals, the instant conversion bath can produce a fine, dense, and uniform zinc
phosphate-type conversion coating even in the absence of an immediately preceding
surface-conditioning treatment for the specific purpose of inducing fine-crystal formation
in the coating.
[0028] In addition, the conversion bath according to the present invention does not require
the addition of nitric acid, nitrous acid, an organic nitro compound, or the like,
and thus can be formulated entirely free of nitrogenous compounds. In this form it
therefore offers the advantage of not requiring the inclusion of a treatment step
for nitrogenous compounds in the effluent treatment process. Nitrogenous compounds
may be added to the conversion treatment bath according to the present invention on
an optional basis, but the nitrogen concentration is preferably held to no greater
than 100 ppm and more preferably to 20 ppm or less.
[0029] Metal ions other than the zinc ions can be added to the zinc phosphate based conversion
bath according to the present invention. These metal ions can act as etchants in order
to induce a uniform etch of the surface of the metal workpiece, or can act as paintability
improvers when the conversion coating is being used as an underpaint coating.
[0030] Suitable non-zinc metal ions are exemplified by nickel ions, manganese ions, cobalt
ions, iron ions, magnesium ions, calcium ions, and so forth. Each of these ions can
be provided by dissolution in the treatment bath of the oxide, hydroxide, carbonate,
sulfate, phosphate, or the like, of the corresponding metal.
[0031] Fluoride ions or complex fluoride ions, e.g., fluosilicate ions, fluozirconate ions,
and the like, can be used as etchant. These ions can be provided, for example, by
dissolving in the conversion treatment bath one or more of the following fluorine
compounds: hydrofluoric acid, fluosilicic acid, fluozirconic acid, fluotitanic acid,
and the corresponding metal salts (e.g., sodium, potassium, magnesium).
[0032] The following process steps preferably should be consecutively executed in the sequence
given in order to form a conversion coating on metal surfaces using a zinc phosphate
based conversion bath according to the present invention: alkaline degreasing, a water
rinse, treatment with the zinc phosphate-based conversion bath, and a water rinse.
The degreasing and water rinse processes may themselves each be implemented as multistage
processes. A deionized water rinse is preferably used for the final water rinse when
the conversion coating will be used as an underpaint coating. Moreover, when the conversion
coating is produced on a metal surface for use as an underpaint coating, it is preferred
that the conversion treatment be immediately preceded by a surface conditioning process
using a colloidal titanium-containing surface conditioner for the purpose of inducing
fine-crystal formation in the coating.
[0033] Metals subjected to the above-described conversion treatment can be painted after
the final water rinse as described above or after a drying step that follows the final
water rinse.
[0034] When plastic working is the intended service for the conversion film formed on a
metal substrate using the conversion bath according to the present invention, after
the above-described degreasing and water rinse the metal workpiece is preferably subjected
to a pickling step for purposes of descaling. Again with reference to production of
the conversion film for plastic working service, the lubricity of the coating can
be improved even further by a soap treatment (lubrication treatment) after formation
of the conversion film.
[0035] Surface treatment using the zinc phosphate-based conversion bath according to the
present invention is generally executed by immersion, spraying, or a combination thereof.
When the conversion film is intended as an underpaint coating, the desired coating
can be, and preferably is, formed by conversion treatment at a treatment temperature
from about room temperature to about 60 °C and at a treatment time from about 0.5
minute to about 5 minutes. When the conversion film is intended for plastic working
service, the desired coating can be, and preferably is, formed by conversion treatment
at a treatment temperature from about 50 °C to about 90 °C and at a treatment time
from about 1 minute to about 15 minutes.
[0036] The invention will be explained in greater detail below with reference to the following
working and comparative examples of actual treatment. The scope of the present invention
is in no way limited by these examples.
Examples
[0037] The test materials were (1) 0.8 mm-thick cold-rolled steel sheets (SPCC-SD, abbreviated
below as "SPC") and (2) galvanized steel sheets (abbreviated below as "plated") prepared
by the zinc electroplating (20 g/m
2) of the aforementioned cold-rolled steel sheets. These were in each case cut to 70
x 150 mm and subjected to treatment in the working and comparative examples described
below.
[0038] The following treatment process steps, which are a typical example of treatment for
the purpose of producing an underpaint coating, were used in the working and comparative
examples:
(1) degreasing (alkaline degreaser, brand name: FINECLEANER™ L4460 from Nihon Parkerizing
Company, Limited, 20 g/L of constituent A, 12 g/L of constituent B);
43 °C, 120 seconds, immersion;
(2) water rinse (tap water);
ambient temperature, 30 seconds, spray;
(3) surface conditioning (colloidal titanium surface conditioner, brand name: PREPALENE®
ZN from Nihon Parkerizing Company, Limited, 1 g/L aqueous solution);
ambient temperature, 30 seconds, spray;
(4) zinc phosphate-based conversion treatment (as described below for the individual
working and comparative examples);
43 °C, 120 seconds, immersion;
(5) water rinse (tap water);
ambient temperature, 30 seconds, spray;
(6) deionized water rinse (deionized water, conductivity = 0.2 microS/cm)
ambient temperature, 20 seconds, spray;
(7) drain and dry;
hot air at 110 °C, 180 seconds,
except that the surface-conditioning step was not carried out in Examples 5 and 7
or in Comparative Example 3, and in these cases the zinc phosphate-based conversion
treatment step (4) was therefore carried out directly after the degreasing (1) and
ensuing water rinse (2) steps.
[0039] The free acidity in the zinc phosphate-based conversion baths in Examples 1 to 8
and Comparative Examples 1 to 4 was adjusted to specific values using sodium hydroxide.
The free acidity was measured by titrating 10 milliliters (hereinafter usually abbreviated
as "mL") of the particular treatment bath to neutrality with 0.1 N aqueous sodium
hydroxide, using bromophenol blue as the indicator. The number of mL of the 0.1 N
aqueous sodium hydroxide required for the color change from yellow to blue was determined
and is reported as "points" of free acidity. The fluoride ions concentration in the
conversion bath was measured using a fluoride sensitive electrode.
[0040] The coating weight was measured as follows: The weight (W1) in grams of the treated
sheet after conversion treatment was first measured, and the treated sheet was then
subjected to a film stripping treatment using the stripping solution and stripping
conditions reported below. The weight of the stripped sheet was measured to give W2
in grams, and the coating weight was calculated from the following equation:
| Treatment for cold-rolled steel sheets |
| stripping solution |
5 % aqueous chromic acid solution |
| stripping conditions |
75 °C, 15 minutes, immersion |
| Treatment for galvanized steel sheets |
| stripping solution |
2 % by weight (hereinafter usually abbreviated as "wt%") of ammonium dichromate +
49 wt% of 28 wt% aqueous solution of ammonia + 49 wt% pure water |
| stripping conditions |
ambient temperature, 15 minutes, immersion. |
[0041] The appearance of the coatings was inspected visually, and the morphology and size
of the grains in the conversion coating was evaluated by inspection with a scanning
electron microscope (SEM).
Example 1
[0042]
| Composition of the conversion bath |
| phosphate ions |
15 g/L (from addition of 75% phosphoric acid) |
| zinc ions |
1.3 g/L (from addition of zinc oxide) |
| nickel ions |
1.0 g/L (from addition of nickel carbonate) |
| manganese ions |
0.5 g/L (from addition of manganese carbonate) |
| fluoride ions |
100 ppm (from addition of 55 % hydrofluoric acid) |
[0043] 450 ppm of tert-butyl hydroperoxide (organoperoxide component) was added to the conversion
bath with the above composition, and the free acidity of the conversion bath was then
adjusted to 0.9 point. A cold-rolled steel test sheetpon was subjected first to the
colloidal titanium surface-conditioning treatment and then to conversion treatment
(conversion temperature = 43 °C, treatment time = 120 seconds) using the above-described
conversion bath. The resulting conversion coating weight was 1.2 g/m
2. The coating crystals were plates with an average grain size of 6 micrometers. The
conversion coating was grayish black and was uniform, fine, and dense.
Example 2
[0044] A galvanized steel test sheet was subjected first to the same surface conditioning
treatment as in Example 1 and then to conversion treatment using the same conversion
treatment bath as in Example 1. The resulting conversion coating weight was 2.8 g/m
2. The crystals were plates with an average grain size of 4 micrometers. The conversion
coating was grayish white and was uniform, fine, and dense.
Example 3
[0045] A cold-rolled steel test sheet was subjected first to the same surface-conditioning
treatment as in Example 1 and then to conversion treatment using the same conversion
treatment bath as in Example 1, except that the organoperoxide addition consisted
of 80 ppm tert-butyl hydroperoxide and the free acidity was adjusted to 0.6 point.
The resulting conversion coating weight was 0.9 g/m
2. The coating crystals were plates with an average grain size of 8 micrometers. The
conversion coating was grayish black and was uniform, fine, and dense.
Example 4
[0046] A cold-rolled steel test sheet was subjected first to the same surface conditioning
treatment as in Example 1 and then to conversion treatment using the same conversion
treatment bath as in Example 1, except that 1,200 ppm of tert-butyl hydroperoxide
was added as the organoperoxide and sufficient 65.5% nitric acid was added to give
a nitrogen component content of 500 ppm. The free acidity of the conversion bath was
adjusted to 0.9 point. The resulting conversion coating weight was 1.1 g/m
2. The coating crystals were plates with an average grain size of 7 micrometers. The
conversion coating was grayish black and was uniform, fine, and dense.
Example 5
[0047] A cold-rolled steel test sheet was subjected to conversion treatment as in Example
1, except that there was no surface-conditioning treatment and only 400 ppm of tert-hexyl
hydroperoxide was added as the organoperoxide. The free acidity was adjusted to 0.9
point. The resulting conversion coating weight was 1.0 g/m
2. The coating crystals were plates with an average grain size of 6 micrometers. The
conversion coating was grayish black and was uniform, fine, and dense.
Example 6
[0048] A cold-rolled steel test sheet was subjected first to the same surface conditioning
treatment as in Example 1 and then to conversion treatment using the same conversion
treatment bath as in Example 1, except that 100 ppm of peracetic acid was added as
the organoperoxide, and the free acidity was adjusted to 0.6 point. The resulting
conversion coating weight was 1.3 g/m
2. The coating crystals were plates with an average grain size of 10 micrometers. The
conversion coating was grayish black and was uniform, fine, and dense.
Example 7
[0049] A cold-rolled steel test sheet was subjected to conversion treatment using the same
conversion bath as in Example 1, except that the surface conditioning treatment was
not used, 500 ppm of tert-butyl hydroperoxide was added as the organoperoxide, and
the free acidity was adjusted to 0.6 point. The resulting conversion coating weight
was 1.1 g/m
2. The coating crystals were plates with an average grain size of 10 micrometers. The
conversion coating was grayish black and was uniform, fine, and dense.
Example 8
[0050]
| Composition of the conversion bath |
| phosphate ions |
15 g/L (from addition of 75 % phosphoric acid) |
| zinc ions |
1.3 g/L (from addition of zinc oxide) |
| nickel ions |
1.0 g/L (from addition of nickel nitrate) |
| manganese ions |
0.5 g/L (from addition of manganese carbonate) |
| fluoride ions |
100 ppm (from addition of 55 % hydrofluoric acid) |
| nitrate ions |
7.2 g/L (from addition of sodium nitrate and nickel nitrate) (nitrogen concentration
= 1.4 g/L). |
[0051] 450 ppm of tert-butyl hydroperoxide (organoperoxide component) was added to the conversion
bath with the above composition, and the free acidity of the conversion bath was then
adjusted to 0.9 point. A cold-rolled steel test sheetpon was subjected first to the
colloidal titanium surface-conditioning treatment and then to conversion treatment
(conversion temperature = 43 °C, treatment time = 120 seconds) using the above-described
conversion bath. The resulting conversion coating weight was 1.1 g/m
2. The coating crystals were plates with an average grain size of 5 micrometers. The
conversion coating was grayish black and was uniform, fine, and dense.
Comparative Example 1
[0052] A cold-rolled steel test sheet was subjected to the same surface conditioning treatment
as in Example 1 and was then submitted to the same conversion treatment as in Example
1, except that the organoperoxide addition consisted of 5 ppm of tert-butyl hydroperoxide.
The conversion coating weight was 0.5 g/m
2, and the development of yellow rust was observed.
Comparative Example 2
[0053] A galvanized steel test sheet was subjected to conversion treatment as in Example
1, except that the organoperoxide addition consisted of 5 ppm of tert-butyl hydroperoxide.
The conversion coating weight was 0.9 g/m
2, the average grain size was 15 micrometers, and the coating was sparse.
Comparative Example 3
[0054] A cold-rolled steel test sheet was subjected to conversion treatment as in Example
8, except that there was no surface-conditioning treatment and 150 ppm of nitrite
salt was added to the conversion bath in place of the organoperoxide. The conversion
coating weight was 0.1 g/m
2, which indicated that almost no conversion coating deposition had occurred. Yellow
rust had developed over the entire surface.
Comparative Example 4
[0055] A cold-rolled steel test sheet was subjected to conversion treatment as in Example
1, except that sodium chlorate was added to the conversion bath in place of the organoperoxide.
The sodium chlorate was added to give a chlorate ions concentration of 1.5 g/L. The
conversion coating weight was 0.9 g/m
2. The coating crystals were columnar and the average grain size was 15 micrometers.
The conversion coating was sparsely deposited, and yellow rust was observed.
[0056] The conditions and results of these examples are summarized in Table 1 below.
[0057] The organoperoxide concentrations used in Examples 1 to 8 were 50 to 1,500 ppm. It
was thereby demonstrated that this concentration range produced a good-quality conversion
coating on cold-rolled steel sheet as well as galvanized steel sheet. A uniform, dense,
and fine coating was obtained even when the surface conditioning treatment was not
used.
[0058] In contrast, Comparative Examples 1 and 2 used organoperoxide concentrations below
50 ppm, and it was found that in these cases the oxidation activity by the conversion
accelerator was inadequate, resulting in the deposition of scattered coating crystals.
The uniformity of the coating on the basis metal was therefore diminished.
[0059] Comparative Examples 3 and 4 used non-organoperoxide conversion accelerators. In
Comparative Example 3, a nitrite salt was used as the conversion accelerator and no
surface-conditioning treatment was carried out. It was found

that in this case conversion coating deposition was entirely absent.
[0060] A chlorate salt was used by itself as the conversion accelerator in Comparative Example
4. It was found that in this case the conversion reaction rate was substantially slowed.
[0061] The zinc phosphate-based conversion bath according to the present invention for application
to metal substrates contains 50 to 1500 ppm of organoperoxide as conversion accelerator.
In consequence thereof, this bath yields uniform, fine, and dense conversion coatings
with coating weights appropriate for the intended applications. This bath at the same
time also acts to induce fine crystal formation in the conversion coating. As a result,
the bath has such good effects that a surface-conditioning treatment is no longer
a necessity.
[0062] We have found that the organic peroxides used by the present invention react under
mild conditions and are more stable than the generally used inorganic accelerators,
and as a consequence have very good economic attributes. Since the presence of nitrogenous
compounds in the conversion treatment bath is also no longer a necessity, environmental
regulations relating to the levels of nitrogenous compound discharge can now be fully
satisfied, and on this point the conversion bath according to the present invention
represents a major practical development.