1. Field of the invention.
[0001] The present invention refers to an improved method for the removal of soluble salts
from a silver halide photographic emulsion, and more particularly to an improved method
of ultrafiltration.
2. Background of the invention.
[0002] Ultrafiltration is a useful way to concentrate and purify various liquid compositions.
Among such compositions are silver halide photographic emulsions. Ultrafiltration
is used to remove soluble silver and halide salts and other low-molecular compounds
formed during the precipitation of the silver halide.
[0003] Silver halide emulsions normally are prepared in a batch process by mixing a silver
nitrate solution with an alkali metal halide solution in a gelatin medium. The composition
is then washed to remove soluble salts. One type of ultrafiltration process is described
in
Research Disclosures Vol. 102, October 1972, item 10208 and Vol. 131, March 1975, item 13122, which are
incorporated herein by reference. The soluble impurities, e.g. alkali metal nitrates,
permeate through the ultrafiltration membrane and the permeate is discarded. Further
references on ultrafiltration include
Research Disclosure Vol. 135, July 1975, item 13577, DE 2436461 and US 2,495,918.
[0004] One problem, however, is that the membrane becomes progressively fouled and clogged
during use and as a result the rate of permeation decreases. As a consequence, a batch
of silver halide emulsion treated with a fresh membrane and one treated with a used
membrane will be subjected to different processing conditions, including reactant
concentrations, residence time in the reaction zone, fluid level in the reaction vessel,
etc. Having been subjected to different processing conditions, the silver halide emulsions
prepared in different batches will not have identical physical and photographic characteristics.
It is possible to clean the membrane and thereby partially restore its original flux
rate. However, some debris will remain after each cleaning and the membrane progressively
degrades with repeated use until it is too clogged to be of use. Such progressive
changes in the physical condition of the membrane result in inconsistent quality of
photographic emulsions.
[0005] Such irreproducible changes can only be avoided by controlling and regulating the
permeate flow rate. In theory this can be accomplished in several ways but they all
show some drawback. In a first way of doing the permeate flux rate can be increased
or decreased by adapting the flow rate of the colloidal dispersion medium containing
the emulsion to be purified through the ultrafiltration membrane. However at low flow
rates the danger for clogging of the membrane increases. Furtheron, by varying the
transmembrane pressure the permeate flow rate can be regulated. However, on surpassing
the maximal allowed transmembrane pressure damage or excessive wear of the membrane
is likely to occur. Other parameters which can influence the permeate flow rate require
an adaptation of the emulsion characteristics which is undesirable from the viewpoint
of constant grain size distribution, constant sensitometry, and coatability.
[0006] In EP 0 585 180 an improved apparatus and method are disclosed by means of which
different batches of silver halide emulsion can be prepared and purified under substantially
identical conditions. The products, therefore, are highly uniform. By this invention
constant purification cycle times throughout the lifetime of the membrane are obtained.
In this process a stream of concentrated emulsion (the concentrate or retentate) is
withdrawn from the higher pressure side of the membrane and is recycled to the first
vessel. The permeate stream is withdrawn from the lower pressure side of the membrane
and is divided into one stream which is recycled to the precipitation vessel and another
stream which is withdrawn at a constant flow rate and directed to a drain. Hence,
instead of entirely discarding the unwanted permeate, a portion is recycled into the
liquid emulsion from which it was filtered. The amount recycled into the first vessel
is dictated by the current condition of the membrane. As the membrane progressively
fouls, progressively less permeate is recycled to the first vessel. The net effect
is that there is a constant, fixed, and controlled flow of permeate withdrawn from
the precipitation vessel, regardless of the condition of the membrane.
[0007] The cited process shows the disadvantage of requiring two control valves, the first
one controlling the division of the permeate stream, the second one controlling the
amount of washing liquid as a function of the vessel liquid level. Furtheron, the
process requires an extra circuit for the portion of the permeate that is recycled.
So from a viewpoint of construction the method is cumbersome.
[0008] The present invention is concerned with a improved method for ultrafiltration alternative
to the teachings of EP 0 585 180.
[0009] It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for ultrafiltration
that overcomes the irreproducibilities connected with the aging of the ultrafiltration
membrane.
[0010] It is a further object of the present invention to provide an ultrafiltration procedure
wherein a constant purification time guarantees a constant final purification degree
and therefore constant emulsion properties, independent of the physical status of
the UF module.
[0011] It still is a further object of the present invention to provide an ultrafiltration
method which is rather simple from the viewpoint of mechanical construction.
3. Short explanation of the drawing.
[0012]
(1) washing liquid supply ;
(2) pump ;
(3) retentate recycling circuit ;
(4) level detector ;
(5) pressure gauge ;
(6) pressure gauge ;
(7) flow rate meter ;
(8) conductivity measuring device ;
(9) control valve ;
(10) permeate drain ;
(11) emulsion precipitation vessel ;
(12) control unit ;
(13) ultrafiltration module ;
(14) pressure gauge ;
(15) vessel outlet ;
(16) ultrafiltration pump ;
(17a) optional silver salt supply ;
(17b) optional halide salt supply ;
4. Summary of the invention.
[0013] The objects of the present invention are realized by providing a method for the removal
of soluble salts by ultrafiltration from a dispersion medium contained in a precipitation
vessel (11), said dispersion medium containing precipitated silver halide or silver
halide being precipitated, said method comprising conveying by means of a pump (16)
a stream of said dispersion medium from said precipitation vessel through a ultrafiltration
module (13), one side of which is maintained at a higher pressure than the other,
said stream entering the module at the higher pressure side, whereby the pressure
difference induces liquid containing soluble salts to flow to the lower pressure side
thus forming a permeate stream which by a permeate circuit is directed to a drain
(10), and whereby the remaining liquid forms a retentate stream (3) which is recycled
to the precipitation vessel,
characterized in that,
(a) a washing liquid (1) and/or silver salt (17a) plus halide salt solutions (17b)
is (are) added to the precipitation vessel in a controlled way, and
(b) a level detector (4) is applied above the liquid surface in the precipitation
vessel that is capable of actuating a control unit (12) that itself is capable of
commanding the iterative opening and closing of a control valve (9), positioned in
said permeate circuit, in such a way that the volume of permeate drained is equal
at any moment to the volume of washing liquid and/or silver salt plus halide salt
solutions added.
[0014] In this way a reproducible end degree of desalting and therefore reproducible photographic
characteristics can be obtained independent of the physical condition of the UF module
used.
5. Detailed description.
[0015] The invention can best be explained by referring to the accompanying drawing (see
section 3 for explanation of the symbols).
[0016] The invention can be applied to two basically different situations : off-line ultrafiltration
and on-line ultrafiltration.
[0017] In off-line ultrafiltration the precipitation of the silver halide emulsion by the
addition of soluble silver and halide salts to the colloidal dipersion medium in the
precipitation vessel is already completed before the desalting procedure according
to the present invention starts. So at the start of the ultrafiltration procedure
the only liquid added is the washing liquid (1) since all silver and halide salt solutions
are already added. The supplies of silver and halide salt (17a and 17b) solutions
may be removed before the start of the ultrafiltration.
[0018] In on-line ultrafiltration the precipitation of the silver halide emulsion by the
addition of soluble silver and halide salts to the colloidal medium in the precipitation
vessel is still going on or even just started when the desalting procedure according
to the present invention starts. So at the start of the ultrafiltration according
to the invention washing liquid and silver plus halide salts are added simultaneously,
or, the addition of washing liquid can even temporarely be completely omitted. At
the moment that the complete amounts of silver and halide salts are added, the purification
procedures enters a second stage wherein the only liquid furtheron added is the washing
liquid.
[0019] For simplicity's sake the process will be explained by the off-line embodiment. However
it should be born in mind that the scope of the invention extends to a method of ultrafiltration
on-line.
[0020] The washing liquid (1) can be a diluted salt solution but preferably it will consist
just of pure water. Important is that the addition is performed in a controlled way
in a predetermined fixed period. Said control of addition can be performed e.g. by
a pump (2) or by a free outlet equipped with a particularly chosen outlet diaphragma.
The flow rate profile of the added liquid can be chosen freely. In principle a linearly
or quadratically increasing flow rate can be applied, but, preferably for most cases,
a simple constant flow rate wil be chosen.
[0021] A level detector (4) is positioned at a desired level in the reaction vessel, preferably
at a minimal distance above the liquid level before the start of the procedure. As
long as no washing liquid is added the level detector is not actuated and the control
unit (12) linked to this level detector keeps the control valve positioned in the
permeate circuit closed. At the start of the procedure washing liquid is added to
the vessel in a controlled way as explained above and the level increases up to and
above the desired level established by the positioning of the level detector. At that
moment the level detector actuates the control unit which itself actuates the control
valve (9) in the permeate circuit as a result of which this control valve is opened.
In this way a permeate stream to a drain (10) is generated and the level of the vessel
liquid is lowered until the desired level is reached again and the control valve is
closed. In this way the opening and closing steps of the control valve are intermittently
repeated. So the permeate flow rate follows the washing liquid flow rate with a certain
delay. But after a certain time a steady state situation is established wherein the
cumulative amount of permeate passed to the drain is practically equal to the cumulative
amount of washing liquid added to the vessel. At the end of the washing procedure
the total amount of permeate drained is equal to the total amount of washing liquid
added.
[0022] The level detector can be an on/off detector, e.g. a device comprising two pins measuring
conductivity changes. Alternatively, it can be a continuous detector such as a floater
the level of which is measured by conductivity contact or distance control by infra-red.
The latter method is less disturbed by foaming.
[0023] The control unit (12), actuated by the level detector (4) opens and closes the control
valve (9) according to a certain control algorithm the nature of which is immaterial
to the present invention. This algorithm can be a simple on/off regulation, or a so-called
Proportional Integral Differentiation (PID) control mechanism, or any other regulating
mechanism.
[0024] The colloidal medium in the reaction vessel (11) containing precipitated silver halide
and a colloid binder, preferably gelatin, is, in a preferred way of doing, sucked
off via an outlet (15) in the vessel bottom by means of the UF pump (16), preferably
a centrifugal pump such as a FRISTAM FK25 pump, and conveyed to the entry of the ultrafiltration
module (13). When the liquid comes in contact with the semipermeable membrane of the
ultrafiltration module a pressure difference is built up across the membrane. The
membrane contains pores sized to permit penetration by molecules below a particular
size while retaining larger molecules, such as the gelatin binder molecules and silver
halide grains in the dispersion medium. Suitable membranes can be selected from among
those exhibiting penetration cutoff in the molecular weight range of from about 500
to 300,000 or more preferably from about 500 to 50,000. By a proper choice of this
cutoff range the soluble inorganic salt molecules being of low molecular weight go
over to the permeate stream while silver halide grains and peptizer molecules remain
in the so-called retentate or concentrate.
[0025] The membranes employed in ultrafiltration are typically anisotropic membranes which
comprise a very thin layer of extremely fine pore texture supported upon a thicker
porous stucture. Useful membranes can be formed of a variety of polymeric materials
such as poly(vinyl chloride), poly(vinyl carboxylate), poly(vinyl formate), poly(vinyl
acetate), poly(vinyl alcohol), polysulfones, poly(vinyl ether), polyacrylamides, polymethacrylamides,
polyimides, polyesters, polyfluoroalkylenes, e.g. polytetrafluoroethylene and polyvinylidene
fluoride, and cellulosic polymers such as cellulose and cellulose esters, e.g. cellulose
acetate, cellulose butyrate and cellulose acetate butyrate. Also ceramic membranes
are possible (Al
2O
3, ZnO
2).
[0026] According to their mechanical construction different types of UF modules exist and
are commercially available. In the "plate and frame" type the membrane is positioned
between plates that support it ; this type allows high pressures but has a big dead
volume. In the "spiral wound" type the membrane is spirally wound together with the
supporting parts ; this type allows reasonable pressures with a lower volume. In the
"hollow fibre" type round membrane fibres are positioned in a vertical container without
support ; this type allows only low presuures but has a very small dead volume. For
the practice of this invention a hollow fibre type UF module is preferred. A useful
commercially available UF module according to this type is the ROMICON HF-5-43-PM10
type showing a pore size of 10,000 Dalton. A lot of other types with varying pore
size are available.
[0027] In principle, instead of employing a single ultrafiltration unit two or more ultrafiltration
units can be used in series but in most cases just one module will be sufficient.
[0028] The retentate liquid (or concentrate) which leaves the outlet of the UF module is
recycled by circuit (3) to the precipitation vessel. The retentate preferably contains
a pressure gauge (5) as illustrated in fig. 1. The permeate circuit which is directed
to a drain preferably comprises, as again illustrated in fig 1., a pressure gauge
(6), measuring devices for flow rate (7) and conductivity (8), and at about the end
of the circuit the control valve (9) which is opened and closed iteratively when actuated
by the control unit.
[0029] The input pressure of the UF module is typically about 1 to 3 bar. When no special
measures are taken the outlet pressure is only about 0.1-0.2 bar. When a higher outlet
pressure is desired this can be accomplished by means of the pressure gauge (5) at
the retentate outlet. However, since the UF pump (16) (so-called bleed pump) is typically
a centrifugal pump an increase of the outlet pressure can dramatically decrease the
pumps flux rate. If this is to be avoided an auxiliary circuit can be built in into
the ultrafiltration loop which comprises the bleed pump. The emulsion is then fed
into this circuit at a high pressure by means of an extra pump, the so-called feed
pump, and recycled from this circuit through a pressure gauge that reduces the high
pressure of the retentate to about zero.
[0030] The silver halide emulsions that can be purified according to the present invention
are not limited to any particular type. They can be selected from i.a. silver chloride,
silver bromide, silver iodide, silver chlorobromide, silver bromoiodide, and silver
chlorobromoiodide. The content of silver iodide is equal to or less than 20 mol%,
preferably equal to or less than 5 mol%, even more preferably equal to or less than
3 mol%.
[0031] The photographic emulsions can be prepared from soluble silver salts and soluble
halides according to different methods as described e.g. by P. Glafkides in "Chimie
et Physique Photographique", Paul Montel, Paris (1967), by G.F. Duffin in "Photographic
Emulsion Chemistry", The Focal Press, London (1966), and by V.L. Zelikman et al in
"Making and Coating Photographic Emulsion", The Focal Press, London (1966). They can
be prepared by mixing the halide and silver solutions in partially or fully controlled
conditions of temperature, concentrations, sequence of addition, and rates of addition.
The silver halide can be precipitated according to the single-jet method, the double-jet
method, or the conversion method.
[0032] The silver halide particles may have a regular crystalline form such as a cubic or
octahedral form or they may have a transition form. They may also have an irregular
crystalline form such as a spherical form or a tabular form, or may otherwise have
a composite crystal form comprising a mixture of said regular and irregular crystalline
forms. They may have a multilayered grain structure. According to a simple embodiment
the grains may comprise a core and a shell, which may have different halide compositions
and/or may have undergone different modifications such as the addition of dopes. Besides
having a differently composed core and shell the silver halide grains may also comprise
different phases inbetween.
[0033] The average size of the silver halide grains may range from 0.05 to 1.0 µm, preferably
from 0.2 to 0.5 µm. The size distribution may be homodisperse or heterodisperse. A
homodisperse size distribution is obtained when 95% of the grains have a size that
does not deviate more than 30% from the average grain size.
[0034] The silver halide crystals can be doped with metal ions, e.g. Rh
3+, Ir
4+, Cd
2+, Zn
2+, Pb
2+.
[0035] Besides the silver halide another essential component of a light-sensitive emulsion
is the peptizer or binder. The binder is a hydrophilic colloid, preferably gelatin.
Gelatin can, however, be replaced in part or integrally by synthetic, semi-synthetic,
or natural polymers. Synthetic substitutes for gelatin are e.g. polyvinyl alcohol,
poly-N-vinyl pyrrolidone, polyvinyl imidazole, polyvinyl pyrazole, polyacrylamide,
polyacrylic acid, and derivatives thereof, in particular copolymers thereof. Natural
substitutes for gelatin are e.g. other proteins such as zein, albumin and casein,
cellulose, saccharides, starch, and alginates. In general, the semi-synthetic substitutes
for gelatin are modified natural products e.g. gelatin derivatives obtained by conversion
of gelatin with alkylating or acylating agents or by grafting of polymerizable monomers
on gelatin, and cellulose derivatives such as hydroxyalkyl cellulose, carboxymethyl
cellulose, phthaloyl cellulose, and cellulose sulphates.
[0036] The gelatin can be lime-treated or acid-treated gelatin. The preparation of such
gelatin types has been described in e.g. "The Science and Technology of Gelatin",
edited by A.G. Ward and A. Courts, Academic Press 1977, page 295 and next pages. The
gelatin can also be an enzyme-treated gelatin as described in Bull. Soc. Sci. Phot.
Japan, N° 16, page 30 (1966).
[0037] The practice of the present invention provides several advantages. A fixed purification
time can be used repeatedly for several batches with excellent reproducibility. This
fixed desalting time can be chosen freely, e.g. in relation to some predetermined
final degree of purification, which, for instance, is controlled by a continuous conductivity
measurement. The method is insensitive to variations in the permeate flux rate and
independent of the maximally attainable permeate drain. By on-line filtration the
addition of washing water can be omitted in a first stage until the end of the precipitation.
The method demands an uncomplicated mechanical construction. But most of all, the
method gives reproducible results over the whole lifetime of the UF module.
[0038] The present invention will now be illustrated by the following examples without however
being limited thereto.
EXAMPLES
1. Ultrafiltration method according to the conventional method (comparative example).
[0039] A mechanical construction was set up according to fig. 1. However, in this comparative
example the control unit which opens and closes the permeate circuit valve is shut-off.
[0040] The washing experiments were performed on an AgClBr emulsion having 0.5 mole of bromide,
showing an average grain size of 0.58 µm and containing 1,5 % of inert gelatin. In
each experiment the precipitation vessel contained 3 l of emulsion. A FRISTAM FK25
pump was used as circulation pump. The ultrafiltration module used was a commercially
available ROMICON HF5-43-PM10 module. Two experiments were performed, one with a brand
new UF module and one with an old used UF module. Due to a higher degree of clogging,
reflected by a higher pressure at the module inlet, the used module tends to give
rise to a lower permeate flow rate as will become clear from the table hereinafter.
In both experiments the washing time was fixed at 60 min at 45 °C. Pure water was
used. The UAg value in the vessel, being the potential difference between a silver
electrode and an INGOLD reference electrode, and the conductivity of the permeate
were measured continuously.
In the comparison experiments the drain of permeate occurs freely, depending on the
hydrodynamic pressure gradients existing in the circuit which themselves depend on
the pressure generated by the UF pump, on the physical status of the membrane, etc..
Therefore the permeate flux rate will vary during the purification cycle and will
be different in the case of an old UF module compared to the case of a new one. Due
to the level adjustment mechanism the total amount of washing liquid will be equal
to the total amount of permeate drained but both amounts are unknown a priori and
can only be determined by measurement of the permeate flux. This is illustrated by
a typical experiment summarized in table 1.
TABLE 1
| Time |
Property |
New module |
old module |
| Start |
UAg |
+92 mV |
+92 mV |
| conductivity |
66.2 mS/cm |
65.2 mS/cm |
| pressure inlet UF mod. |
1.65 bar |
1.95 bar |
| pressure outlet UF mod. |
0.40 bar |
0.40 bar |
| pressure permeate side |
0.05 bar |
0.05 bar |
| flow rate permeate |
146 ml/min |
100 ml/min |
| End (60 min) |
UAg |
+144 mV |
+133 mV |
| conductivity |
14.5 mS/cm |
21.6 mS/cm |
| pressure inlet UF mod. |
1.50 bar |
1.80 bar |
| pressure outlet UF mod. |
0.30 bar |
0.35 bar |
| pressure permeate side |
0.05 bar |
0.05 bar |
| flow rate permeate |
130 ml/min |
92 ml/min |
[0041] As it is clear from the table the end values of UAg and conductivity are different
for both experiments. In other words, a constant washing time is unsuitable for the
comparison method since it leads to irreproducible and unpredictable end values of
UAg and conductivity and therefore to uncontrollably varying emulsion properties.
2. Ultrafiltration method according to the invention.
[0042] The same mechanical set-up was used as in the comparative example. However, in this
example according to the invention the control unit which opens and closes the permeate
circuit valve was working.
[0043] The experiments were performed on exactly the same emulsion type and under the same
conditions as the comparison experiments. Again the same new and used UF modules were
employed. A constant washing water flow rate of 80 ml/min was established. Since the
washing time again was 60 min the total washing water added was 4800 ml. So the total
amount of permeate drained was also exactly 4800 ml since the amount of permeate drained
was linked to the amount of washing water by the mechanism of the present invention.
The relevant parameters of the experiments are summarized in table 2.
TABLE 2
| Time |
Property |
New module |
old module |
| Start |
UAg |
+105 mV |
+105 mV |
| conductivity |
50.7 mS/cm |
50.4 mS/cm |
| pressure inlet UF mod. |
1.40 bar |
1.90 bar |
| pressure outlet UF mod. |
0.50 bar |
0.35 bar |
| pressure permeate side |
0.05 bar |
0.05 bar |
| flow rate permeate |
80 ml/min |
80 ml/min |
| End (60 min) |
UAg |
+146 mV |
+146 mV |
| conductivity |
14.2 mS/cm |
14.5 mS/cm |
| pressure inlet UF mod. |
1.40 bar |
1.80 bar |
| pressure outlet UF mod. |
0.35 bar |
0.30 bar |
| pressure permeate side |
0.05 bar |
0.05 bar |
| flow rate permeate |
80 ml/min |
80 ml/min |
[0044] As it is clear from the table, by using the method of the present invention the same
end values for conductivity and UAg are obtained both for the new and for the used
UF module. In other words, when using the method of the present invention a constant
washing time guarantees the same degree of emulsion purification and consequently
of photographic properties, independent of the physical status of the UF module.