[0001] The present invention relates to a process of metallizing phosphor screens, in particular
for cathode ray tubes (CRTs).
[0002] The electron permeable, light reflecting aluminium film on the target side of the
phosphor screen of a CRT is formed by the evaporation of aluminium onto a smooth film
of an organic material formed over the surface of a phosphor screen. This smooth film
is subsequently burnt out to leave a mirror-like film of aluminium "tenting" across
the top of the phosphor screen.
[0003] Various processes for metallizing phosphor screens have been proposed in the prior
art and these can generally be classified as solvent based systems and aqueous based
systems.
[0004] In the solvent based system, the phosphor layer is first wetted with an aqueous based
pre-wet and a solvent based lacquer, comprising an approximately 2% solution of a
polymer such as poly(iso-butylmethacrylate) in a solvent such as toluene, is floated
on the top of the pre-wet. The water and solvent are removed by heating leaving a
film of the polymeric material approximately 1µm in thickness.
[0005] The major disadvantage of this approach is that it involves the use of large quantities
of volatile organic solvents, such as toluene, with all the associated environmental
concerns.
[0006] Aqueous based systems are described in US-A-3067055, US-A-3582389 and US-A-3582390
in which a water-based emulsion of a water insoluble, film forming resin such as an
acrylate resin copolymer is coated onto the phosphor screen, the coating is dried,
the coated layer is metallized, and the coating of the resin film volatilized by heating
at a temperature of up to about 450°C. The emulsion contains about 5 to 20 weight
percent of the resin. In the latter patent specification hydrogen peroxide is added
to the emulsion, whereby it is stated that the tendency of the metal layer to blister
over the phosphor screen area during the baking-out step is reduced.
[0007] One disadvantage of the aqueous based system is that the dispersion fills all of
the spaces between the phosphor strips or dots and is thus a thicker layer than in
the solvent based system. Accordingly, the amount of polymer left on the screen is
greater than utilized in solvent based processes and is therefore more difficult to
remove. Consequently, increased energy requirements may result from the application
of extended or even multiple burn out steps.
[0008] In the solvent based system as described generally above the polymer film solution
and the aluminium are applied to the phosphor screen and then the funnel of a CRT
is attached to the screen with a glass frit in an organic binder. It is possible to
remove both the polymer film and the organic binder in one heating cycle.
[0009] In the aqueous based systems the quantities of polymer to be removed are such as
to generally necessitate the bake out of the polymer film before the addition of the
funnel of a CRT. Therefore two heating cycles are required with increased energy costs,
and greater investment required in the number of ovens and thus also the space required
on the manufacturing site. Alternatively, an oxygen rich environment may be used to
bake out the polymer in one heating cycle. This approach involves increased equipment
costs and the requirement of oxygen.
[0010] Another approach described in the prior art for metallizing phosphor screens is described
in US-A-3910806. In the method as disclosed a thin layer of a metal such as aluminium
is applied to the phosphor screen of a cathode ray tube by the transfer of a metal
layer formed on a substrate directly to the phosphor layer on the phosphor screen.
The metal layer is adhered to the phosphor layer by means of a pressure sensitive
adhesive and the substrate which is releasably attached to the metal layer is then
removed.
[0011] DE-A-3321396 discloses the application of an organic layer to a phosphor screen followed
by an aluminium layer with removal of the organic layer by heating.
[0012] EP-A-0382554 discloses a method for forming a metal backed layer using a metal film
transferring sheet. The method involves forming a metal film on a mold-releasable
sheet and either transferring the metal film to a phosphor screen, or forming a phosphor
screen on the metal film and then transferring the composite onto a face plate with
subsequent removal of the mold-releasable sheet.
[0013] We have now developed a process of metallizing phosphor screens which is more energy
efficient than the aqueous based systems of the prior art which does not involve the
use of organic solvents, as in the solvent lacquers, and which does not involve the
use of a pressure sensitive adhesive and the complicated transfer mechanism described
in the prior art.
[0014] Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for the metallization of a
phosphor screen which process comprises the steps of:
either
a) applying to a phosphor screen a preformed film of a polymeric material which volatilizes
at a temperature of below 450°C, the preformed film having a layer of metal deposited
on one side thereof, to form a composite;
or
b) applying to a phosphor screen a preformed sandwich of aluminium between two layers
of a polymeric material;
and
c) heating the composite formed in step (a) or step (b) to a temperature above the
decomposition temperature of the polymeric film in order to decompose and/or volatilise
the polymeric film coating.
[0015] The films described in (a) above can be applied with the aluminium layer directly
in contact with the phosphors on the TV screen, or, with the polymer layer directly
in contact with the phosphors on the TV screen. The advantage of the first approach
is that there is no polymer layer between the aluminium layer and the phosphors. As
a result, the aluminium layer is directly in contact with the phosphors and there
is a much reduced chance of the aluminium film blistering during the burn out step.
Additionally, since the polymer burns out above the aluminium layer a thicker and
hence mechanically stronger polymer backing layer can be used to transfer the delicate
aluminium layer to the phosphor screen. This facilitates the ease of application of
the pre-formed aluminised film to the phosphor screen.
[0016] The advantage of using the sandwich approach (b) is that the important aluminium
layer is fully protected. In step (b) the polymeric material used on either side of
the aluminium layer may be the same or different.
[0017] The film of the polymeric material which is used in the process of the invention
preferably has a thickness in the range of from 0.1 to 10µm, or a film area density
of from 0.1 to 10 mg/cm
2 or more preferably 0.1 to 3.0 mg/cm
2.
[0018] A conventional solvent based lacquer will give a film in the order of one micrometre
thickness.
[0019] The polymeric film is a film which decomposes and/or volatilizes at a temperature
of below 450°C. Suitable polymeric films comprise poly(acrylate), poly(methacrylate)
poly(hydroxyalkanoate) poly(carbonate), poly(ethyleneoxide)-poly(propyleneoxide) block
copolymer, poly(alpha-methylstyrene), hydroxypropyl cellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl
methyl cellulose, alginic acid or an associative thickener, such as Rheox (Registered
Trade Mark) from Rohm and Haas and Rheovis from Allied Colloids.
[0020] The preferred polymeric film material for use in the present invention comprises
a film of a poly(hydroxyalkanoate), preferably poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), poly(3-hydroxyvalerate),
or a copolymer of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and 3-hydroxyvaleric acid. Suitable copolymers
may comprise, for example 60 to 90% by weight of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and 40 to 10%
by weight of 3-hydroxyvaleric acid. Suitable poly(hydroxyalkanoates) for use in the
present invention are supplied in granular form or in the form of a latex under the
Trade Name Biopol (Zeneca Specialities).
[0021] Biopol films are available from Goodfellow Limited, or can be prepared from Biopol
in granular form such as by the methods as disclosed in WO94/00163, EP-A-0226439,
WO91/13207 and DE-A-4040158. They can also be formed from a Biopol latex.
[0022] Optionally the following materials can be formulated into the polymeric film; hydrogen
peroxide, ammonium oxalate or the boric acid complex of poly(vinyl alcohol). These
materials are used to prevent blisters on the metal film caused by the evaporation
of the polymer during the burn out cycle. Additionally, appropriate plasticisers such
as phthalates and glycolates may be incorporated to reduce the brittleness of the
polymer film.
[0023] A metal layer may be deposited onto the film coated screen according to techniques
known in the art. For the production of CRTs the metal layer is aluminium which is
preferably deposited onto the phosphor screen by vacuum evaporation. The aluminium
layer preferably has a thickness in the range of from 0.1 to 0.3µm.
[0024] Alternatively, the film of the polymeric material may be metallized on one side thereof
to form a laminate which is applied to the phosphor screen to form a composite, or
the film of the polymeric material may be metallised on one side and an additional
polymeric film applied to form a three layered laminate which is applied to the phosphor
screen in the form of a composite.
[0025] The application of the preformed film or the metallized polymeric film to the phosphor
screen may be carried out by any suitable technique. It may be advantageous to pre-wet
the phosphor screen, for example with a sodium silicate based aqueous solution, in
order to assist in the even and uniform application of the film on the phosphor screen.
[0026] The composite formed either in step (a) or step (b) of the method of the invention
is then heated to a temperature above the decomposition and/or volatilization temperature
of the polymeric film to burn out the polymeric film. The preferred polymeric films
for use in the present invention will decompose on heating to leave no residue, preferably
at a temperature of below 350°C.
[0027] In putting the process of the present invention into practice, the heating of the
composite in step (c) may be combined with the step of sealing the funnel of a cathode
ray tube to the phosphor screen, i.e. a separate baking step to volatilise the polymeric
film coating becomes unnecessary. The sealing of a cathode ray tube funnel to a metallized
phosphor screen is well known in the art, the seal generally being effected by using
a frit sealing process in which a glass frit in an organic binder is used to seal
the components together. The oxygen which is present in the cathode ray tube is generally
sufficient to assist in the burn out of the polymeric film coating, although it will
be understood that additional air or oxygen-enriched air may be introduced into the
cathode ray tube, as necessary. The frit sealing of the metallized phosphor screen
to the cathode ray tube will generally occur at a temperature of about 450°C. The
conventional temperature profile for the sealing cycle is termed a Lehr cycle.
[0028] The present invention also includes within its scope a phosphor screen which has
been metallized by the process of the invention and a cathode ray tube which includes
at least one phosphor screen which has been metallized by the process of the invention.
[0029] The present invention will be further described with reference to the following Examples
in which the following definitions are used.
Lehr Cycle
[0030] The Lehr cycle used in the following Examples is as follows: heat from room temperature
to 450°C at 10°C/min, hold at 450°C for 45 minutes and then cool to room temperature.
Aluminised
[0031] Aluminised refers to the vapour deposition of a 1 inch piece of 99.99% pure aluminium
wire (0.58 mm diameter) at 1.5 x 10
-5 mbar using an Edwards coating system E306A (Registered Trade Mark) to produce an
aluminium coating on the substrate.
EXAMPLE 1
The preparation of pre-formed aluminised from 1µm mean particle size Biopol latex
[0032] A 7.6cm x 7.6cm (3" x 3") square piece of glass plate was spun horizontally on its
axis at a rate of 160 rpm for 20 seconds. During this time, ca 10 ml of 29% solids
containing Biopol latex (supplied by Zeneca Specialities, Batch Number: BPL No. 505/1001)
was slurried directly onto the spinning glass slide. The glass slide was spun again
for a further 20 seconds at 160 rpm to remove any excess latex and to leave a thin
even thickness wet latex coat on the glass slide. The slide was dried at room temperature
to leave a translucent plastic coating on the slide (film area density = 0.34 mg/cm
2). The plastic film was aluminised and then peeled off the slide ready for further
use.
The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed aluminised and non-aluminised Biopol
films made from 1µm mean particle size Biopol latex
EXAMPLE 2
[0033] A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based
pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-formed aluminised film as
made in Example 1 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of
the film facing away from the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature
and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering
to the phosphors.
EXAMPLE 3
[0034] A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based
pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-formed aluminised film as
made in Example 1 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of
the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and
heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering
to the phosphors.
EXAMPLE 4
The preparation of pre-formed aluminised films from 0.5µm mean particle size Biopol
latex
[0035] A 7.6cm x 7.6cm (3" x 3") square piece of glass plate was spun horizontally on its
axis at a rate of 160 rpm for 20 seconds. During this time, ca 10 ml of 41% solids
containing Biopol latex (supplied by Zeneca Specialities, Batch Number: BPL No. 510/0301)
was slurried directly onto the spinning glass slide. The glass slide was spun again
for a further 20 seconds at 160 rpm to remove any excess latex and to give a thin
even thickness wet latex coat on the glass slide. The slide was dried at room temperature
to leave a translucent polymeric coating on the slide (film area density = 2.83 mg/cm
2). The polymeric film was then aluminised and peeled off the glass backing slide ready
for further use.
The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed aluminised Biopol films made from
0.5µm mean particle size Biopol latex
EXAMPLE 5
[0036] A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based
pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-formed aluminised film as
made in Example 4 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of
the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and
heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering
to the phosphors.
EXAMPLE 6
The preparation of pre-formed aluminised films from poly(propylene carbonate)
[0037] A 7.6cm x 7.6cm(3" x 3") square piece of glass plate was spun horizontally on its
axis at a rate of 160 rpm for 20 seconds. During this time, ca 10 ml of a 5% w/w solution
of poly(propylene carbonate) (supplied by PAC Polymers Inc., grade 40 M, lot number
20507-72-21) in dichloromethane was slurried directly onto the spinning glass slide.
The glass slide was spun again for a further 20 seconds at 160 rpm to remove any excess
liquid and to leave a thin even thickness wet polymeric coat on the glass slide. The
slide was dried in an oven at 55°C for 1 hour, aluminised and peeled off the glass
backing slide ready for further use. (Film area density = 0.65mg/cm
2).
The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed aluminised poly(propylene carbonate)
films
EXAMPLE 7
[0038] A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based
pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-aluminised poly(propylene
carbonate) film as made in Example 6 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the
aluminised side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at
room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium
film adhering to the phosphors.
The preparation of pre-formed aluminised films made from poly(isobutyl methacrylate)(PIBMA)
EXAMPLE 8
[0039] A stock solution was made by dissolving 5g of poly(isobutyl methacrylate) [PIBMA]
(supplied by ICI Acrylics, under the trade name Elvacite, grade 2045) in 45g of toluene.
To this stock solution was added 10 drops of di-n-butylphthalate as plasticizer and
10 drops of Disperbyk 164 as wetting agent (supplied by BYK). 2ml of this stock solution
was coated onto a Teflon tile covering ca. 40 cm
2 of the Teflon. The tile was left to dry in an oven at 45°C for 3 hours, then, ca.
30 cm
2 of the resulting plastic film was peeled off the Teflon backing tile, placed flat
onto a glass slide and aluminised. (Film area density = 5.2mg/cm
2).
The preparation of pre-formed aluminised films made from hydroxypropylcelluose
EXAMPLE 9
[0040] A 7.6cm x 7.6cm(3" x 3") piece of Mylar sheet was spin coated with 10 ml of the following
aqueous stock solution: 40g of 5wt% hydroxypropylcellulose (supplied by Hercules Ltd,
Aqualon division under the trade name Klucel (viscosity type L) in water containing
5 drops of BYK024 wetting agent, supplied by BYK). The sheet was dried in an oven
for 2 days at 45°C, aluminised and peeled off its Mylar backing sheet ready for further
use. (Film area density = 1.7mg/cm
2).
EXAMPLE 10
[0041] A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based
pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-aluminised cellulose film
as made in Example 9 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminium side of
the film facing away from the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature
and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave in the main part an aluminium
film adhering to the phosphors.
EXAMPLE 11
[0042] A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based
pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-aluminised cellulose film
as made in Example 9 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminium side of
the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and
heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave in the main part an aluminium
film adhering to the phosphors.
EXAMPLE 12
The formation of pre-formed Biopol/Aluminium/PIBMA film sandwiches
[0043] A piece of pre-aluminised Biopol film as made in Example 4 whilst adhered to its
glass backing slide, was spin coated (160 rpm, 20 seconds) with 10ml of a 5% w/w solution
of Elvacite (PIBMA) in toluene (slurried on). The slide was re-spun (160 rpm, 20 seconds).
The resulting film was dried in an oven at 55°C for 1 hour, then the whole film sandwich
was peeled off the glass backing slide ready for further use. (Film area density =
3.1mg/cm
2).
The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed Biopol/Aluminium/PIBMA film sandwiches
EXAMPLE 13
[0044] A piece of TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet.
Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of Biopol/Aluminium/PIBMA sandwich as made
in Example 12 was placed onto the phosphors with the PIBMA side of the film facing
towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the
conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
EXAMPLE 14
The preparation of pre-formed poly(propylene carbonate) aluminium/PIBMA film sandwiches
[0045] A pre-aluminised poly(propylene carbonate) film as made in Example 6 whilst still
on its glass backing side was spin coated (160 rpm, 20 seconds) with 10ml of a 5%
w/w solution of Elvacite (PIBMA) in toluene (slurried on). The slide was re-spun (160
rpm, 20 seconds). The resulting film was dried in an oven at 55°C for 1 hour, then
the film sandwich was peeled off the glass backing slide ready for further use. (Film
area density = 1.08mg/cm
2).
The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed poly(propylene carbonate)/Aluminium/PIBMA
film sandwiches
EXAMPLE 15
[0046] A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based
pre-wet. Whist the screen was still wet, a piece of poly(propylene carbonate)/aluminium/PIBMA
film as made in Example 14 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the PIBMA side
of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried in air at room temperature
and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave in the main an aluminium
film adhered to the phosphors.
1. A process for the metallization of a phosphor screen which process comprises the steps
of:
either
a) applying to a phosphor screen a preformed film of a polymeric material which volatilizes
at a temperature of below 450°C, the preformed film having a layer of metal deposited
on one side thereof, to form a composite;
or
b) applying to a phosphor screen a preformed sandwich of aluminium between two layers
of a polymeric material;
and
c) heating the composite formed in step (a) or step (b) to a temperature above the
decomposition temperature of the polymeric film in order to decompose and/or volatilise
the polymeric film coating.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the film of polymeric material has a thickness
in the range of from 0.1 to 10µm.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the film of polymeric material
has a film area density of from 0.1 to 10 mg/cm2.
4. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the polymeric film
comprises a film of a poly(acrylate), poly(methacrylate), poly(hydroxy-alkanoate),
poly(carbonate), poly(ethyleneoxide), poly(propyleneoxide) block copolymer, poly(alpha-methylstyrene)hydroxypropyl
cellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, alginic acid or an associative
thickener.
5. A process as claimed in claim 4 wherein the poly(hydroxyalkanoate) is a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate),
a poly(3-hydroxyvalerate) or a copolymer of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and 3-hydroxyvaleric
acid.
6. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the phosphor screen
is pre-wetted before step (a) or (b).
7. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the metal which is
deposited upon the film coated screen or upon the polymeric film is aluminium.
8. A process as claimed in claim 7 wherein the layer of aluminium is deposited by vacuum
evaporation.
9. A process as claimed in claim 8 wherein the layer of aluminium has a thickness in
the range of from 0.1 to 0.3µm.
10. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the decomposition
and/or volatilisation of the polymeric film is effected at a temperature of below
350°C.
11. A process claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the heating of the composite
in step (c) is effected during the sealing of the funnel of a cathode ray tube to
the phosphor screen.
12. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the maximum temperature reached during the
sealing step is about 450°C.
13. A phosphor screen which has been metallized by a process as claimed in any one of
the preceding claims.
14. A cathode ray tube which includes at least one phosphor screen which has been metallized
by a process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12.
1. Verfahren zur Metallisierung eines Bildschirms, wobei das Verfahren folgende Schritte
aufweist: entweder
a) Aufbringen einer vorgefertigten Schicht eines Polymermaterials auf den Bildschirm,
dass sich unterhalb einer Temperatur von 450°C verflüchtigt, wobei auf eine Seite
der Schicht Metall aufgebracht ist, um ein Verbundmaterial zu bilden;
oder
b) Aufbringen einer Sandwich-Verbundjschicht aus Aluminium zwischen zwei Schichten
Polymermaterials auf einen Bildschirm;
und
c) Aufheizen des in Schritt (a) oder Schritt (b) gebildeten Verbands auf eine Temperatur
oberhalb der Zersetzungstemperatur der Polymerschicht, um die Polymerbeschichtung
zu zersetzen und/oder zu verflüchtigen.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem das Polymermaterial eine Schichtdicke in dem Bereich
von 0,1 µm bis 10µm aufweist.
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, bei dem das Polymermaterial eine flächenbezogene
Schichtdichte (Flächengewicht) von 0,1 mg/cm2 bis 10 mg/cm2 aufweist.
4. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Polymerschicht eine
Schicht aus einem Polyacrylat, Polymethacrylat, Polyhydroxyalkanoat, Polycarbonat,
Polyethylenoxid, Polypropylenoxid-Blockcopolymer, Poly(alphamethylstyren) hydroxypropylzellulose,
Methylzellulose, Hydroxypropylmethylzellulose, Alginsäure oder ein assoziatives Verdickungsmittel
ist.
5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 4, bei dem das Polyhydroxyalkanoat ein Poly-3-Hydroxybutyrat,
ein Poly-3-Hydroxyvalerat oder ein Copolymer aus 3-Hydroxybuttersäure und 3-Hydroxyvaleriansäure
ist.
6. Verfahren nach einem der vorausgehenden Ansprüche, bei dem der Bildschirm vor Schritt
(a) oder (b) vorbefeuchtet ist.
7. Verfahren nach einem der vorausgehenden Ansprüche, bei dem das Metall, das auf dem
beschichteten Schirm oder auf der Polymerschicht abgelagert wird, Aluminium ist.
8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 7, bei dem das Aluminium durch Vakuumverdampfung abgelagert
wird.
9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8, bei dem die Aluminiumschicht eine Dicke in dem Bereich
von 0,1 bis 0,3 µm aufweist.
10. Verfahren nach einem der vorausgehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Zersetzung und/oder
Verflüchtigung der Polymerschicht bei einer Temperatur unterhalb 350°C bewirkt wird.
11. Verfahren nach einem der vorausgehenden Ansprüche, bei dem das Aufheizen des Verbundmaterials
in Schritt (c) während des Aufsiegelns des Trichters oder einer Kathodenstrahlröhre
auf den Bildschirm bewirkt wird.
12. Verfahren nach Anspruch 11, bei dem die bei dem Aufsiegelschritt erreichte Maximaltemperatur
ungefähr 450°C beträgt.
13. Bildschirm der durch ein Verfahren nach einem der vorausgehenden Ansprüche metallisiert
ist.
14. Kathodenstrahlröhre die wenigstens einen Bildschirm aufweist, der durch ein Verfahren
nach wenigstens einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 12 metallisiert worden ist.
1. Procédé de métallisation d'un écran phosphorescent, lequel procédé comprend les étapes
consistant à :
soit
a) appliquer sur l'écran phosphorescent un film préformé en un matériau polymère qui
se volatilise à une température inférieure à 450°C. le film préformé ayant une couche
de métal déposée sur l'une de ses faces, de manière à former un composite ;
ou
b) appliquer sur l'écran phosphorescent un sandwich préformé d'aluminium compris entre
deux couches de matériau polymère ;
et
c) chauffer le composite formé dans l'étape (a) ou l'étape (b) à une température supérieure
à la température de décomposition du film polymère de manière à décomposer et/ou volatiliser
le revêtement formé par le film polymère.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le film de matériau polymère a une épaisseur
dans la gamme de 0,1 à 10 µm.
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou la revendication 2 dans lequel le film de matériau
polymère a une densité surfacique de film de 0,1 à 10 mg/cm2.
4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le film
polymère comprend un film de poly(acrylate), poly(méthacrylate), poly(hydroxy-alcanoate),
poly(carbonate), poly-(oxyde d'éthylène), copolymère bloc de poly(oxyde de propylène),
poly(alphaméthylstyrène)hydroxypropyl cellulose, méthylcelulose, hydroxy propyl méthylcellulose,
acide alginique ou un épaississant associatif.
5. Procédé selon la revendication 4 dans lequel le poly(hydroxyalcanoate) est un poly(3-hydroxybutyrate),
un poly(3-hydroxyvalérate) ou un copolymère d'acide 3-hydroxybutyrique et 3-hydroxyvalérique.
6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'écran
phosphorescent est prémouillé avant l'étape (a) ou l'étape (b).
7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le métal
qui est déposé sur l'écran revêtu du film ou sur le film polymère est de l'aluminium.
8. Procédé selon la revendication 7 dans lequel la couche d'aluminium est déposée par
évaporation sous vide.
9. Procédé selon la revendication 8 dans lequel la couche d'aluminium a une épaisseur
dans la gamme de 0,1 à 0,3 µm.
10. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la décomposition
et/ou volatilisation du film polymère est effectuée à une température inférieure à
350°C.
11. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le chauffage
du composite dans l'étape (c) est effectué pendant le scellage de l'entonnoir du tube
à rayons cathodiques à l'écran phosphorescent.
12. Procédé selon la revendication 11 dans lequel la température maximale atteinte durant
l'étape de scellage est d'environ 450°C.
13. Ecran phosphorescent métallisé par un procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications
précédentes.
14. Tube à rayons cathodiques comprenant au moins un écran phosphorescent qui a été métallisé
par un procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 12.