[0001] At lifting trucks increasingly higher lifting heights have become a reality in later
years since it for economical reasons is advantagous to keep the floor area of the
ware house as small as possible. Since furthermore of the same reason the trucks must
be able to manoeuvre in narrow alleys the support area of the trucks will be comparatively
small. These factors result in increasing demands on the stability of the truck. The
stability of the truck is however not only influenced by its design, dimensions, degree
of wear e t c but also of the loads that are lifted. It is consequently important
that the driver uses his judgement and for instance does not lift too large loads
too high or execute too fast maneuvers with a too heavy load too high up. Since modern
trucks are provided with increasingly more powerful engines and higher battery capacities
it is not always certain that the driver notices or even considers how heavy load
he is handling.
[0002] In order to increase the security in view of the above problem at lifting with in
particular high lifting trucks it is in accordance with the invention suggested the
arrangement of a weight indication for the driver so that he knows how heavy loads
he handles. This weight indication is in accordance with the invention carried out
by measuring the current to the motor of the hydraulic pump. In order to eliminate
the risk that occasional variations result in an erroneous measuring preferably a
mean value of the current is taken during a certain time or this is integrated during
a fixed time interval. Obtained values are then multiplied with a conversion factor
so that the weight in for instance kg is obtained and fed to a suitable representation
device that may be digital or analogous. Possibly the calibration weight indication
may automatically control the indication in kilograms, lbs e t c. The weight may of
course also be presented in a percentage of allowed maximum load.
[0003] Since at lifting not only the load in itself is lifted up hydraulicly but also load
forks, fork carriage e t c the measuring device is preferably set to zero or calibrated
by measuring taking place during a lift without load. Since furthermore the inertia
or rolling friction of the fork carriage e t c may vary from truck to truck calibration
may as an alternative be done by lifting of a calibration weight. Preferably the calibration
weight may be of the same size as the weights prefered to have the most correct measured
value or have a slightly higher weight.
[0004] Since for instance the viscosity of the hydraulic oil may change during a work shift
the 0-position may be altered during use, that is in principal the current necessary
for an empty lift. If desired a corresponding adjustment of the measured value can
be carried out successfully since checking and comparing can be carried out by means
of a small computer or microprocessor every time that an empty lift is executed.
[0005] Preferably the weight of the load is measured during a free lift, that is the movement
when the fork carriage moves in an associated extendable mast that is in its lowest
position. During this movement the lifted weight associated with the truck is the
lowest in relation to the load and therefor the best precision at the measuring of
weight is obtained. Since it may however also be important at the lowering of a load
that is situated very high up already at the lifting of this from its storing place
to know its weight at least a rough weight indication may be very important. In order
to achieve this compensation can be made for the weight of the lifted mast, that is
the current that the engine of the hydraulic pump requires for lifting higher than
the free lift without load. Since this movement essentially has the same motion pattern
from time to time comparatively exact current values may be obtained that can be subtracted
from the current obtained when the load initially is lifted. Alternatively the current
that is then obtained is compared with the current required for the lifting of the
empty forks shortly before the intended lifting position has been reached. In other
words the load changes may be indicated.
[0006] The differentiation of the measuring device between a free lift or a higher lift
may easily be achieved by means of a switch or other sensor placed in the vicinity
of the lower end of the mast, which switch is influenced as soon the mast is in its
lowest position. When the mast is in its lowest position it is a free lift and otherwise
it is a lift in which the entire mast take part. Alternatively a switch may be used
that react at the passing of the upper end of the free lift and that at each passage
switch measuring mode. If lift height indication is present this can be used to deliver
this information.
[0007] Since the current is not a direct measurement of the weight that is lifted, but also
depend on the acceleration of the lifting movements, the measuring device preferably
during the weight evaluation controls that the movement has a constant speed. This
can for instance be done by controlling the voltage the during the measurement, which
voltage is to be essentially constant in order to indicate constant velocity, alternatively
a compensation can take place for the acceleration.
[0008] The constant speed at measuring is preferably chosen considerably lower than maximum
speed for lifting so that the influence of hydraulic flow losses is reduced. Preferably
the measurement, in any case if a good accuracy is desired, is carried out at the
same speed from measurement to measurement.
[0009] To the weight indication may be coupled a warning signal that is activated if too
big loads are on their way to be handled.
[0010] Since not only the weights of the loads but also the levels on which these are handled
influence stability relations the presentation may also indicate to which height a
particular load may be lifted. Directly when the driver lifts a load from the ground
or from a lorry he thus knows which is his highest permitted storage level in the
ware house. The indication may be given directly in permitted storage levels and one
can consider a programming that is also adapted to other trucks working in the ware
house so that no loads get out of reach for certain trucks. Preferably the truck is
also equipped with an additional indication or warning that indicates or warns if
the maximum load is exceeded. By further combining the weight measure in with a device
for the measurement of the position of the lifting forks one can obtain an indication
or warning if one tries to take a too great load to high up. Of course the driver
can keep track of this based exclusively on the weight that is lifted and his knowledge
of permitted weights for different heights, but as realized a warning system increases
the safety in the work. The position indication may for instance be obtained in the
way that is described in a simultaneously filed Swedish patent application.
[0011] When measuring of load weights takes place the remaining hydraulic power users are
disconnected and only lifting takes place with the motor at which the current is measured.
1. Method at lifting trucks for the indication of the weight of the lifted load, characterized in that the current to a motor delivering the power for the lifting is measured and
used as a measure of the lifted load.
2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that from the measured current is subtracted a current value corresponding to the
current obtained at a lift without load, alternatively comparing is made with a current
value that is obtained at the lift of a calibration weight.
3. Method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the measuring takes place at a constant lifting velocity, for instance constant
number of revolutions per minute for the motor delivering the lifting power.
4. Method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that measurement only takes place in the free lift zone.
5. Method according to any of the claims 1 - 3, characterized in detection of free lift or not and that different current values are subtracted from
measured value depending on if measurement takes place in the free lift zone or above
this.
6. Device for the execution of the method in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that it includes a current sensor arranged in the feed line to the electric motor
that drives the hydraulic pump of the truck, and that it includes a computing unit
comparing the obtained current with a previously registered current value at a lift
of a calibration weight and/or an empty lift and a presentation device for instance
a digital one.
7. Device according to claim 6, characterized in that it further includes a sensor that registers when the mast is in its lowest position
and consequently lifting only takes place with the fork carriage and that it includes
an additional memory for the current value that is obtained at an empty lift above
the free lift so that it dependent on if lift takes place in the free lift zone or
above this can subtract correspondingly at an empty lift obtained currents from the
corresponding measured values.
8. Device according to any of the claims 6 - 7, characterized in that it further includes means for monitoring that during the measurement the velocity
of the movement is constant, for instance a monitoring of the number of revolutions
per minute or control of the current while lifting, the lifting speed preferably being
chosen low at measuring and possibly also the same velocity from measurement to measurement.
9. Measurement in accordance with any of the claims 1 - 5, characterized in that a mean value is taken for the current or that the current is integrated for
a certain time.
10. Device according to any of the claim 6 - 8, characterized in that it includes a signaling device, signaling to the driver that the load exceeds
permitted load.