[0001] The present invention relates to a particle-coated substrate (in particular, an abrasive
material formed by coating a substrate with abrasive particles) in which a substrate
is coated uniformly and in a thin layer with cohesive fine particles, a particle ejector
for fabricating the coated substrate, a coated substrate fabricating apparatus comprising
the ejector, a particle-coated substrate fabricating method (in particular, a method
of fabricating an abrasive material in which a substrate is coated with abrasive particles),
and an abrasive sheet.
[0002] The known conventional particle ejecting pump in a coating device in which particles
are fed out along with gas from a coating gun nozzle is, for example, constructed
as shown in Fig. 12. More specifically, a porous plate 2 on which particles to be
coated are placed is provided at a lower portion of a particle feed tank 7. The porous
plate 2 is provided with a straight particle feed tube 8, one end of which is opened
to the porous plate 2 and the other end of which is connected to an ejector 9. In
the pump of such a construction, particles 1 are fed to upside of the porous plate
2, and fluidizing air 6 fed to the downside of the particle feed tank 7 passes through
the porous plate 2 and agitates the particles 1 on the porous plate 2 Further, the
particles 1 are fed to the ejector 9 via the particle feed tube 8 by an internal pressure
Pa in the particle feed tank 7. Other similar examples are disclosed in JP-A-6-286872
and JP-A-6-304502.
[0003] Such a conventional particle-coated substrate fabricating apparatus has had the following
problems. Even if a proper particle size distribution of the particles 1 is obtained
by agitating the particles 1 so that they are brought into a fluidized state on the
porous plate 2 (hereinafter, the term "agitation" means an agitation for imparting
a fluidized state), the particles 1 would be subject to blocking, agglomeration or
bridging again inside the particle feed tube 8 and in the container of the ejector
9 so that the particle size of the particles would be coarsened. The above "bridging"
means that supplying particles are adhered in a certain range of size. The above "blocking"
means that the bridging particles are adhered to each other and agglomerate. As a
result, even if the particles 1 undergo shear due to a gas stream 5 fed to the ejector
9, the particles 1 would agglomerate and thereby have a coarsened particle size and
a varied particle size distribution. Consequently, the conventional coating device
has had difficulty in ejecting fine particles having a particle size distribution
of 5 µm or less without agglomeration. Furthermore, even if the particles 1 have a
relatively large particle size, their particle size distribution would vary with time,
encountering difficulty in controlling the particle size.
[0004] JP-A-55-149000 discloses an injector pump to prevent carried material from concretion
and deposition on the inner wall of a hopper. The side wall of the hopper is constructed
of an external wall and the inside is formed by a porous material. Gas flow is injected
into the hopper through a flow injection port and the inside wall. A gas layer is
formed on the inside surface of the inside wall in such a way that the concretion
and the deposition of carried material on the inside wall can be effectively avoided.
[0005] GB-A-2103959 relates to an apparatus for flame spraying a mixture of refractory and
easily combusted metal particles including the material store which holds the mixture
in a state of full or partial fluidisation and means for entraining a mixture in a
jet of relatively inert gas, such as air. The entrained mixture is supplied to a lance
where it is mixed with sufficient oxygen to combust.
[0006] The object of the present invention is, therefore, to remedy the above-described
disadvantages and to provide a particle ejector capable of attaining a uniform particle
size distribution, a particle-coated substrate fabricating apparatus comprising the
ejection and a particle-coated substrate fabricating method.
[0007] This object is solved with the features of the claims.
[0008] In particular there is provided an ejector for ejecting particles to be coated onto
a substrate, comprising
a storage container made of a porous material, the container including an interior
adapted for storing particles in the container and an outer surface;
an ejection gas nozzle extending from outside the container to the interior and provided
at a bottom portion of the storage container, in a portion thereof where the particles
are stored, adapted for feeding to the interior of the storage container an ejection
gas to be ejected to outside of the storage container;
a discharge tube arranged generally coaxially of the ejection gas nozzle at the bottom
portion of the storage container and extending from the interior of the container
to outside the container, and adapted for sending the ejection gas and the particles
from the interior to outside of the storage container; and
an agitation gas inlet in fluid communication with the outer surface of the porous
storage container adapted for feeding an agitation gas from the outside of the storage
container through the porous container to the interior of the storage container to
perform agitation for imparting a fluidized state to the particles present at least
at the bottom portion of the storage container interior where the ejection gas nozzle
and the discharge tube are disposed.
[0009] With the above construction, the agitation gas, passing through the porous material
to the inside of the storage container, is fed to at least the bottom portion of the
storage container where the ejection gas nozzle and the discharge tube are disposed,
whereby the particles are agitated within the storage container. Accordingly, the
storage container acts so that the particles to be stored will not undergo blocking,
agglomeration or bridging, and that a uniform particle size distribution of the particles
will be obtained.
[0010] In a variation of the above embodiment, there is further provided an outer container
forming a gas-pressure buffer portion defined by a clearance between the outer container
and the outer surface of at least the bottom portion of the storage container where
the ejection gas nozzle and the discharge tube are disposed, wherein the agitation
gas inlet is in fluid communication with the buffer portion. In a preferred embodiment
the gas-pressure buffer portion is formed so as to surround the storage container.
[0011] Also, according to the present invention, there is provided an apparatus including
an ejector as described above for fabricating a particle-coated substrate, the apparatus
comprising
an ejector as described above;
a particle feeder for providing particles to the interior of the ejector storage container;
and
a coating device arranged in fluid communication with the discharge tube of the ejector
for coating a substrate with the particles sent out from the ejector by means of the
ejection gas.
[0012] With the above construction, in the ejector which is fed with particles from the
particle feeder, the agitation gas passes through the inside of the storage container
so as to be fed to the particles stored at least at the bottom portion of the storage
container where the ejection gas nozzle and the discharge tube are disposed. As a
result; the particles are agitated in the storage container. Accordingly, the ejector
acts so that the particles will not undergo blocking, agglomeration or bridging and
that a uniform particle size distribution is obtained.
[0013] Also, according to the present invention, there is provided a method for fabricating
a particle-coated substrate, comprising the steps of:
(a) feeding particles to a storage container of an ejector, the ejector comprising:
a storage container made of a porous material, the container including an interior
adapted for storing particles in the container and an outer surface;
(b) agitating the particles with an agitation gas provided through an agitation gas
inlet in fluid communication with the outer surface of the porous container, through
the porous container to the interior of the storage container to perform agitation
for imparting a fluidized state on the particles present at least at the bottom portion
of the storage container;
(c) ejecting the fluidized particles from the interior of the container by providing
an ejection gas through an ejection gas nozzle extending from outside the container
to the interior and provided at a bottom portion of the container where the particles
are fluidized, the ejection gas and particles exiting the storage container through
a discharge tube arranged generally coaxially of the ejection gas nozzle; and
(d) coating a substrate with a coating device with the particles sent out from the
discharge tube by means of the ejection gas.
[0014] In the particle agitating step, the agitation gas is fed to the particles stored
at least at the bottom portion of the storage container where the ejection gas nozzle
and the discharge tube are disposed, via the inner wall of the storage container provided
to the ejector. As a result, the particles in the storage container are agitated so
as not to undergo blocking, agglomeration or bridging, and a uniform particle size
distribution can be obtained.
[0015] Also, there is provided a coated substrate fabricated by using the above-described
fabricating apparatus or fabricated by the above-described fabricating method.
[0016] In particular, the coated substrate is characterized by being coated with 5 µm or
less abrasive particles by a particle spraying process. However, the present invention
is not thereby limited and may of course also be advantageously used with particles
larger than 5 µm.
[0017] The agitation gas is fed to the particles stored at least at the bottom portion of
the storage container where the ejection gas nozzle and the discharge tube are disposed,
via the inner wall of the storage container provided to the ejector. As a result the
particles in the storage container are agitated so as not to undergo blocking, agglomeration,
or bridging, and a uniform particle size distribution can be obtained. Accordingly,
a uniform particle size distribution can be obtained on the particles ejected from
the ejector and coated onto the substrate.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0018]
Fig. 1 is a plan view of a first embodiment of an ejector according to the present
invention;
Fig. 2 is a sectional view of the ejector of Fig 1 taken along the line 2-2;
Fig. 3 is a plan view of a second embodiment of an ejector according to the present
invention;
Fig. 4 is a sectional view of the ejector of Fig 3 taken along the line 4-4;
Fig. 5 is a graph showing results determined by experiments upon relationships among
particle drawing negative pressure P3, ejection gas flow V2, and secondary absorbed gas flow V3 with respect to ejection gas pressure P2;
Fig. 6 is a view of an arrangement of a coated substrate fabricating apparatus according
to the present invention.
Fig. 7 is a graph showing variation in the particle size distribution of particles
from when they are fed to the fabricating apparatus shown in Fig. 6 until when they
are coated onto the substrate;
Fig. 8 is a graph showing variation in the particle size of particles from when they
are fed to a conventional fabricating apparatus until when they are coated to the
substrate, in the conventional coated substrate fabricating apparatus;
Fig. 9 is a view showing a state of the particles in the coated substrate fabricated
by the fabricating apparatus shown in Fig. 6;
Fig. 10 is a view showing another state of the particles in the coated substrate fabricated
by the fabricating apparatus shown in Fig. 6;
Fig. 11 is a view showing a state of particles in the coated substrate fabricated
by a conventional fabricating apparatus; and
Fig. 12 is a sectional view showing a conventional ejector.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0019] A particle-coated substrate, a particle ejector for fabricating the coated substrate,
a coated substrate fabricating apparatus comprising the ejector, a particle-coated
substrate fabricating method, and an abrasive sheet are described hereinbelow with
reference to the accompanying drawings. It is noted that the coated substrate is fabricated
by the fabricating apparatus comprising the aforementioned particle ejector and fabricated
by the coated substrate fabricating method.
[0020] Figs. 1 to 4 are views showing the ejector. The ejector is intended to eject particles
with which a sheet-like substrate, which is one form of a substrate, is coated. In
the present embodiment, the coated substrate is an abrasive sheet. An ejector 100
as shown in Figs. 1 and 2 comprises a storage container 110, an ejection gas nozzle
120, a discharge tube 130, an outer container 140, and a gas-pressure buffer portion
150.
[0021] The storage container 110, which has it container interior formed into a conical
shape so that particles can be easily fed from a later-described particle feeder and
ejected from the container, is to store the particles in a container interior 111.
Also, the storage container 110 is made of a porous material so as to be capable of
feeding gas from outside the container to inside the container via numerous pores.
The wall thickness of the storage container 110 is determined by taking into consideration
pressure loss due to the wall thickness as well as material strength, it is finally
determined experimentally so that gas will be ejected uniformly from an inner wall
surface 115 of the storage container 110.
[0022] The porous material preferably comprises specified-size pores irrespective of its
type. The porous material may be selected from among, for example, ceramics such as
SiC and Al
2O
3, plastics such as Teflon (trademark of Du Pont Co.), metallic materials of sintered
stainless steel, and rubber materials, depending on the conditions under which it
is used. As for the size of the pores formed in the porous material, too small a size
would result in too large resistance to passage of the gas through the pores, making
it difficult to control the gas pressure Too large a size, conversely, would make
it likely that the particles adhere to the inner wall surface 115 of the storage container
110 during or after the use of the ejector 100 and tend to clog the pores. Accordingly,
the optimum condition of the pore size is determined experimentally in connection
with other factors, for example, gas ejection pressure or the shape of the storage
container 110 and so on In experiments, for example, with a gas ejection pressure
of 0.0 1 MPa, with a particle size of 10 µm, it has been determined that the pore
diameter of the porous material should preferably be set to 20 µm to 100 µm such that
the aforementioned problems are unlikely to occur in general cases
[0023] The ejection gas nozzle 120 is a nozzle that acts to feed ejection gas into the storage
container and' eject the particles stored in the container interior 111 to outside
of the storage container. The nozzle 120 is fitted from outside of the storage container
110 to a concave portion 112 formed at a bottom portion of the conical storage container
110.
[0024] The discharge tube 130, which is disposed at the concave portion 112 and coaxially
with the ejection gas nozzle 120, is a nozzle that discharges both the ejection gas
ejected from the ejection gas nozzle 120 and the particles stored in the storage container
110 outside of the storage container 110.
[0025] The outer container 140 is a container that surrounds the storage container 110 with
a proper clearance against an outer side face 113 of the storage container 110. The
clearance forms a gas-pressure buffer portion 150. The gas-pressure buffer portion
150 optionally may be provided between a bottom face 114 of the storage container
110 and the outer container 140. The ejection gas nozzle 120 and the discharge tube
130 are arranged to penetrate through the outer frame container 140. The outer container
140 is preferably made of a metallic material with a view to ensuring the strength
of the ejector 100, but may be any suitable strong material such as ceramics or the
like.
[0026] The gas-pressure buffer portion 150 forms a space that is closed by an upper lid
141 being screwed to the outer container 140. As a result, pressure of the gas fed
from an agitation gas inlet hole 142 opened at one or more points of the outer container
140 is applied generally uniformly to the entire outer wall of the storage container
110 without being applied directly to part of the storage container 110, so that a
uniform gas ejection at the inner wall surface 115 of the storage container 110 is
obtained. It is noted that although the gas-pressure buffer portion 150 is formed
into chambers communicating with each other in the present embodiment, it optionally
may be divided into discrete areas. In the case where the gas-pressure buffer portion
150 is divided into discrete areas, agitation gas inlet holes 142 are formed in the
outer container 140 corresponding to these areas.
[0027] The gas-pressure buffer portion 150 may be omitted as shown in an ejector 170 in
Figs. 3 and 4. In this embodiment, gas is fed directly from the agitation gas inlet
holes 142 to the outer side face 113 of the storage container 110. The fed gas, passing
through the pores of the storage container 110, is fed to the inside of the storage
container Further, without the gas-pressure buffer portion 150, it is preferable,
in particular, to arrange a plurality of agitation gas inlet holes 142 so that the
gas will be ejected through the conical inner wall 115 and concave portion 112 of
the storage container 110.
[0028] The upper lid 141 is provided with an opening 143 so that particles can be fed to
the container interior 111 of the storage container 110.
[0029] The gas to be fed to the ejection gas noble 120 and the agitation gas inlet holes
142 may comprise inert gases such as nitrogen, argon and the like, or air. Preferably
the gas is controlled for humidity and temperature, and is preferably a gas containing
a liquid having a surface tension of 40 dyne, for example, vapor of ethanol or perfluorocarbon.
[0030] Furthermore, although the storage container 110, the outer container 140, and the
like are formed into a rectangular shape as shown in the figure in the present embodiment,
they may comprise any other desired shape.
[0031] The use of the above-described ejector 100 is now described.
[0032] When agitation gas is fed to the agitation gas inlet holes 142, a generally uniform
gas pressure is applied to the outer side face 113 of the storage container 110 via
the gas-pressure buffer portion 150. The agitation gas, passing through the pores,
is fed to the storage container interior 111, where it agitates the particles present
at least in the concave portion 112 provided at the bottom portion of the storage
container 110 where the ejection gas nozzle 120 and the discharge tube 130 are disposed.
Further, the gas agitates the particles stored in the interior 111 of the storage
container 110. Meanwhile, the particles agitated by the ejection gas are also ejected
through the discharge tube 130 and ejected to outside of the ejector 100 together
with the ejection gas.
[0033] In connection to the above operation, on the assumption that a pressure of the ejection
gas fed to the ejection gas nozzle 120 is P
2, a flow of the ejection gas is V
2, a particle drawing negative pressure in the container interior 111 is P
3, and that a flow of secondary absorbed gas which is absorbed and discharged together
with the particles in the storage container interior 111 is V
3, Fig. 5 shows an example of the experimental results of relationships among the particle
drawing negative pressure P
3, the ejection gas flow V
2, and the secondary absorbed gas flow V
3, with respect to the ejection gas pressure P
2. The unit for the values of the V
2 and V
3 is "Nl/min" which means a gas flow (1) per one minute converted at standard condition
(1 atm, 0°C). The dimensions of the ejector used to generate the data presented in
Fig 5 are as follows. The storage container 110 has a square shape with each side
of approximately 56 mm and a height of approximately 38 mm. The container interior
111 has a conical shape with a maximum diameter of approximately 50 mm. The concave
portion 112 has a diameter of approximately 15 mm and a depth of approximately 13
mm. A clearance corresponding to the gas-pressure buffer portion 150 is approximately
3 mm. In the figure, white or open marks denote results from the embodiment ejector,
while black or closed marks denote results from the conventional ejector as illustrated
in Fig. 12. Fig. 5 suggests the following:
1) The section gas pressure P2 is related linearly to the spraying pressure of a coating means, for example, a corona
charge type spray gun, and therefore should be set optimally depending on the environment
under which particles are coated onto the substrate;
2) Meanwhile, in order to coat the substrate with the particles uniformly every time,
it is preferable that the feed of particles from the particle feeder to the ejector
is controlled so as to be carried out under constant conditions, and that the drawing
conditions at the orifice of the ejector, particularly the particle drawing negative
pressure P3 and the secondary absorbed gas flow V3, are maintained as constant conditions even if the ejection gas pressure P2 has changed; and
3) As shown in Fig. 5, with the ejector of the present embodiment it is found that
the particle drawing negative pressure P3 and the secondary absorbed gas flow V3 are held generally constant independently of the ejection gas pressure P2, suggesting high performance in the function of an ejector. In contrast, with the
conventional ejector it is found that the particle drawing negative pressure P3 increases monotonically toward the negative pressure with increasing ejection gas
pressure P2, while the secondary absorbed gas volume V3 increases also monotonically, with the result that the drawing conditions at the
orifice undergo a great change.
[0034] Next described is an embodiment of the particle-coated substrate fabricating apparatus
incorporating the above-described ejector 100 or ejector 170 of the present invention
(hereinafter, typified by the ejector 100).
[0035] As shown in Fig. 6, the fabricating apparatus 200 comprises the ejector 100 as described
above, a particle feeder 210 provided upstream of the ejector 100 and serving for
feeding particles to the storage container 110, and a coating device 230 provided
downstream of the ejector 100 and serving for coating a sheet-shaped substrate 250
with the particles.
[0036] The particle feeder 210 has a vibrative air slider 211. The vibrative air slider
211 has a vibration floor 212 that serves to vibrate a floor surface to which the
particles are fed, and to eject gas from the floor surface, so that the particles
are dispersed and then fed to the ejector 100. In this way, the particle feeder 210
fluidizes fine particles measured and fed to the feed side of the vibration floor
212 by vibrating the vibration floor 212 and ejecting the gas.
[0037] In one preferred embodiment, the V-20B made by Shinko Electric Co., Ltd. is used
as the vibration source of the vibrative air slider 211, and the vibration floor 212
is made of stainless steel having a 9 µm mesh. The pressure of the gas fed to the
vibration floor 212 is 0.01 MPa.
[0038] Other embodiments of the particle feeder comprise reciprocative type feeders, rotating
vertical spindle type feeders, rotating horizontal spindle type feeders, screw type
feeders, endless belt type feeders, volumetric type feeders, and fluidized type feeders,
or combinations of these feeders.
[0039] The coating device 230 is given by a corona charge type spray gun in the present
embodiment. In one preferred embodiment, a corona charge type spray gun made by Ransburg
Industry Co., Ltd., model number MPS1-F is used
[0040] In one preferred embodiment, the material of the storage container 110 of the ejector
100 is Teflon (trademark of Du Pont Co.), and the agitation gas pressure is 0.01 MPa.
Also, the ejection gas pressure P
2 is 0.3 MPa.
[0041] Other embodiments of the coating device include hybrid type spray guns and triboelectric
charge type spray guns
[0042] In addition, a dispersing apparatus may be arranged by mechanically connecting the
vibrative air slider 211 and the ejector 100 with each other, so that the ejector
100 is also vibrated by the vibration of vibrative air slide 211.
[0043] It may also be arranged that a particle transfer tube between the ejector 100 and
the coating device 230 is vibrated.
[0044] The fabricating apparatus 200 having the above-described arrangement operates in
the following manner. Fine particles 260 fed to the vibrative air slider 211 are fed
to the storage container 110 of the ejector 100 while they are controlled so as not
to undergo blocking, agglomeration, or the like due to vibrations of the vibrative
air slider 211 and ejection of the gas. In the storage container 110 of the ejector
100, the particles are agitated and then ejected from the discharge tube 130 with
ejection gas, and thus fed to the coating device 230. The coating device 230 applies
the fed particles onto the sheet, which is the substrate 250, by an electrostatic
coating method.
[0045] Referring to the above fabricating apparatus 200, the particle size distribution
of the particles 260 in the process from when the particles are fed to the vibrative
air slider 211 until coated to the substrate 250 is explained with reference to Figs
7 and 8, based on a comparison between a case where the ejector 100 of the present
invention is used and another case where the conventional ejector as illustrated in
Fig. 12 is used. It is noted that the particles to be coated to the substrate 250
comprise abrasive particles.
[0046] The abrasive particles to be coated to the substrate 250, after milling, are classified
and then have a specified particle size distribution Then, the particles are granulated
and temporarily stored. The particles may tend to cohere while stored The particle
size obtained over the process is assumed as "a'"
[0047] Meanwhile, in the state that the abrasive sheet 251 has been begun to be fabricated,
the particles 260 are fed to the vibrative air slider 211 in a predetermined quantity,
where they are fluidized by gas ejection and vibrations derived from the vibration
floor 212 of the vibrative air slider 211. As a result the cohered particles are re-divided
into a coarse particle size of "b" Then with the particle size distribution of "b"
, the particles are fed to the storage container 110 in of the ejector 100.
[0048] Within the storage container 110 of the ejector 100 of the present embodiment, as
described above, the particles are agitated with agitation gas so as to be kept in
a fluidized state, with their particle size distribution maintained in the fine particle
state, without causing blocking or agglomeration which would occur in the conventional
case. The particle size distribution obtained in this case is indicated by "c" as
shown in Fig. 7.
[0049] In the conventional ejector, on the other hand, fed particles are deposited in the
ejector and undergo blocking and agglomeration among particles which results in coarser
particles. The resulting particle size distribution is indicated "c'" as shown in
Fig. 8.
[0050] The particles in the ejector 100 of the present embodiment are subjected to a shear
force when entering the high-speed gas stream of the agitation gas at the orifice
of the ejector 100, such that they are crushed. Thus, its particle size distribution
results in "e" as shown in Fig. 7. Accordingly, when the ejector 100 of the present
embodiment is used, there will not occur blocking or agglomeration among particles
within the ejector 100. As a result, the particle size distribution "e" of the coating
particles becomes a fine and constant distribution, and one approximate to the particle
size distribution "a" of the primary particle can be easily attained.
[0051] On the contrary, when the conventional ejector is used, blocking and agglomeration
tends to occur in the ejector. Accordingly, as shown in Fig 8, the particle size distribution
"e'" of the coating particles is inferior to the particle size distribution "a" of
the primary particles
[0052] As seen above, with the use of the ejector 100 of the present invention, the particles
remain in a fluidized state within the ejector container. Accordingly, blocking, agglomeration
or the like is unlikely to occur, making it easy to maintain fine particle size distribution.
Also, drawing of the particles at the orifice of the ejector can be made constant
irrespectively of the particle drawing negative pressure P
3, allowing uniform coating of the particles to be achieved.
[0053] Using the above-described fabricating apparatus 200 allows the abrasive sheet to
be fabricated under processes of various conditions. One preferred embodiment of the
particle-coated substrate fabricating method is shown below.
[0054] Abrasive kraft paper is used as the substrate 250.
[0055] The adhesive comprises the following components:
| Epoxy resin |
100 |
parts by weight |
| Curing agent |
3.0 |
parts by weight |
| Xylene |
34.3 |
parts by weight |
| |
137.3 |
parts by weight |
[0056] First, the above adhesive is coated onto the substrate 250 at 22°C, 110 g/m2.
[0057] Particle coating is performed on the adhesive coated to the substrate 250 under the
following conditions.
[0058] Aluminum oxide #4000 is used as the particles. A table type feeder (made by Funken
Powtechs, Inc., 25 g/min feed) is used as the feeder to the vibrative air slider 211.
With the use of the vibrative air slider 211, the ejector 100, and the coating device
230, the particle spray coating is performed on the substrate 250. The particle spray
coating method is performed in two ways, one with electric field applied and the other
not.
[0059] The layer subjected to the particle spray coating is dried in a ventilated furnace
at 140°C for 5 min. Then, the same adhesive is further coated onto the dried layer
under the same conditions and dried under the same conditions.
[0060] Next, a coated substrate (hereinafter, referred to also as "abrasive paper"), which
is one form of the coated substrate fabricated by the fabricating method with the
use of the above-described fabricating apparatus 200, is described with a comparison
to a coated sheet fabricated by the conventional fabricating apparatus
[0061] When a sheet is fabricated by using the conventional ejector, in which a contact
surface at which particles are brought into contact with the ejector is not formed
of a porous material, particles composed of less cohesive particles. i.e., larger
particles can be coated by using the conventional ejector whereas particles composed
of smaller particle size (e.g., 5 µm or less), adhere to and are deposited onto the
contact surface of the conventional ejector by their cohesion. The particles deposited
in this way, when reaching some amount, will be absorbed into a gas stream of the
ejection gas fed to the conventional ejector by the action of gravity or the like,
and dispersed by the shearing action of the ejection gas. However, the particles drawn
into the ejector in cohered state are not dispersed sufficiently, and the cohered
particle are drawn into the gas stream irregularly. As a result, the particles in
the gas ejected from the conventional ejector cannot be maintained at a constant concentration
within the spray stream.
[0062] As seen above, when the conventional ejector is used, cohered particles are present
on the surface of the sheet and the concentration of particles ejected from the ejector
is not uniform. Thus, products obtained in this case would include variations in the
coating thickness of the particles.
[0063] On the contrary, when the above-described ejector of the present invention is used,
such problems described above do not occur. Therefore, products of various abrasive
particle sizes can be fabricated over the range of from coarse to fine particles without
any difficulties.
[0064] Table 1 shows results of comparison between a case where the ejector of the present
invention is used and another case where the conventional ejector is used, with respect
to a rate of non-defective products for abrasive papers of various abrasive particle
sizes. It is noted that particles were coated onto the sheets by the electrostatic
coating method. In a column for the ejector of the present invention in Table 1, "A"
denotes the embodiment of the ejector 170 in which the gas-pressure buffer portion
150 is not provided but a plurality of agitation gas inlet holes 142 are provided.
while "B" and "C" denote embodiments of the ejector 100 in which the gas-pressure
buffer portion 150 is provided. Further, in the cases of "A" and "B", the coating
process involves the action of electric field, and in the case of "C", an electric
field was not used.
TABLE 1
| Type of abrasive sheet |
Rate of non-defective products with the use of the embodiment ejector |
Rate of non-defective products by the conventional method |
| Abrasive particle size (µm) |
Item |
A (%) |
B(%) |
C(%) |
|
| 15 |
1000 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| 9 |
2000 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
85 |
| 5 |
3000 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
0 |
| 3 |
4000 |
98 |
98 |
97 |
0 |
| Cannot be fabricated |
| 1 |
8000 |
96 |
95 |
80 |
0 |
| Cannot be fabricated |
| 0.5 |
- |
90 |
93 |
70 |
0 |
| Cannot be fabricated |
| 0.1 |
- |
53 |
54 |
51 |
0 |
[0065] Table 2 shows results of comparison between an abrasive efficiency of the abrasive
paper fabricated by the conventional method (slurry method) in which abrasive particles
are previously mixed with an adhesive and coated onto the substrate, and another abrasive
efficiency of the abrasive paper fabricated by using the ejector of the present invention.
It is noted that the abrasive paper fabricated by using the ejector of the present
invention is applied by the electrostatic coating method and that an ejector with
the gas-pressure buffer portion 150 provided is used. Further, the abrasive efficiency
refers to one which shows a change in weight between before and after the abrasion
of 4 x 6 inch rectanglar samples when the samples are rubbed 1000 times of reciprocation,
the abrasive efficiency showing that the larger a value of the abrasive efficiency
is, the more successfully abrasion can be achieved. In Table 2, the abrasive paper
as shown in Fig 9 is used in methods numbered "1" to "4" of this embodiment whereas
the abrasive paper as shown in Fig. 10 is used in the methods numbered "5" and "6"
of this embodiment.

[0066] As will be understood from the comparison between Fig. 9, which shows the abrasive
paper in the cases of the present embodiment. and Fig. 11, which shows an abrasive
paper in the case of the conventional abrasive paper, the reason that the abrasive
efficiency of the abrasive paper according to the present embodiment is better than
that by the conventional method is due to the form of abrasive particles 252 on the
substrate 250. In other words, in the conventional method, because of strong cohesion
of the particles ejected from an ejector, the particles cannot be coated in a dry
state. So, a mixture of the particles with an adhesive is coated onto the substrate
by using a spatula or the like. Accordingly, as shown in Fig. 11, edge portions 252a
of the abrasive particles 252 are not generally perpendicular to the substrate but
result in a lateral arrangement generally parallel to the substrate.
[0067] In contrast to this, in the present invention, the particles in the ejector can be
made less cohesive so that only the abrasive particles 252 are coated to the substrate
250. In other words, there can be fabricated an abrasive paper in which the abrasive
particles are coated onto the adhesive on the surface of the substrate 250 as shown
in Fig. 9, and moreover another abrasive paper in which a second adhesive 253 is coated
onto the particles as shown in Fig. 10. Accordingly, in the abrasive paper according
to the present invention, the edges 252a of the abrasive particles 252 are arranged
irregularly with respect to the substrate 250, so that the surface of the abrasive
paper is not formed into a flat plane unlike the conventional method. This accounts
for a significant difference in abrasive efficiency as much as approximately three
times that of the conventional method. Yet, as shown in Table 2, some differences
of the abrasive efficiency are recognized among the embodiments, due to the orientation
of the abrasive particles 252 on the substrate 250 (when the electrostatic coating
is used, the major axes of to abrasive particles are more likely to be arranged as
they are aligned along a direction of the electric field), as well as due to a degree
of coating of the adhesive. However, the differences are small as compared with the
conventional examples, such that the advantages of the present invention can be remarkable
in each case. In addition, the reason why even the abrasive paper shown in Fig. 10
is superior in abrasive efficiency to the conventional examples is that the adhesive
253, even if it has covered the entire surface of the abrasive particles 252, will
be compressed during abrasion, causing the abrasive particles 252 to act upon an abraded
object. A further reason is that, in the abrasive sheet of the present invention the
edges 252a of the abrasive particles 252 are oriented toward an abraded surface of
the abraded object, as compared with the conventional examples.
[0068] When particles made of Al
2O
3 with a particle size of 3 µm are coated onto an nonwoven fabric made of nylon resin,
the abrasive fabric in the case of the present invention has the substrate 250 coated
with the particles more finely and more uniformly than in the conventional examples.
[0069] As described above, according to the ejector of the present invention, the agitation
gas, passing through the storage container, is fed to the particles present at least
at the bottom portion of the storage container where the ejection gas nozzle and the
discharge tube are disposed. Thus, the particles are agitated in the storage container
in order not to cause blocking, agglomeration, or bridging, making it possible to
obtain a uniform particle size distribution of the particles ejected from the ejector.
[0070] Also, according to the fabricating apparatus of the present invention, in the ejector
to which particles are fed from the particle feeder, the agitation gas, passing through
in the storage container, is fed to the particles present at least at the bottom portion
of the storage container where the ejection gas nozzle and the discharge tube are
disposed. Thus, the particles are agitated in the storage container in order not to
cause blocking, agglomeration or bridging, making it possible to obtain a uniform
particle size distribution of the particles ejected from the ejector.
[0071] Further, according to the fabricating method of the present invention, in the particle
agitating process, the agitation gas is fed to the particles present at least at the
bottom portion of the storage container where the ejection gas nozzle and the discharge
tube are disposed, via the inner wall of the storage container comprised to the ejector.
Thus, the particles in the storage container are agitated in order not to cause blocking,
agglomeration or bridging, making it possible to obtain a uniform particle size distribution
of the particles ejected from the ejector.
[0072] Furthermore, by the arrangement that the agitation gas is fed to the particles present
at least at the bottom portion of the storage container where the ejection gas nozzle
and the discharge tube are disposed, via the inner wall of the storage container comprised
to the ejector, the particles in the storage container are agitated in order not to
cause blocking, agglomeration or bridging, making it possible to obtain a uniform
particle size distribution of the particles ejected from the ejector. Therefore, the
coated substrate can be made into a particle-coated substrate in which particles are
coated onto the substrate with a uniform particle size distribution.
[0073] The present invention has now been described with reference to several embodiments
thereof. The foregoing detailed description and examples have been given for clarity
of understanding only. No unnecessary limitations are to be understood therefrom.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many changes can be made in the
embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, the
scope of the present invention should not be limited to the exact details and structures
described herein, but rather by the structures described by the language of the claims.