[0001] The present invention relates to match head formulations suitable for the production
of safety matches as well as matches that may be struck anywhere and to matches formed
when coated with the said formulations.
[0002] For many years match head formulations have contained chromium compounds, phosphorus
sesquisulphide, sulphur and/or sulphur compounds and zinc oxide. These compounds are
now widely recognised as having undesirable environmental properties both in relation
to the manufacture of such formulations and in relation to their use and it is therefore
an object of the present invention to provide a match head formulation in which these
compounds are substantially absent.
[0003] One type of match in common use has a match head formulation which is ignited by
an abrasive contact with any suitable roughened surface. These are referred to as
'strike anywhere' matches. A second type of match in common use has a match head formulation
which is ignited by an abrasive contact with a surface containing a formulation for
initiating ignition of the match head. These are referred to as 'safety matches'.
[0004] UK-A-2252312 discloses compositions which comprise phosphorus or ferrophosphorus
and excluding environmentally harmful components containing sulphur, chromium or zinc.
Phosphorus match compositions for safety matches as well as strike anywhere matches
are disclosed, the strike anywhere formulations comprising larger proportions of phosphorus.
Matches made using these formulations have excellent environmentally friendly properties.
The purpose of this invention is to improve the control of the sensitivity properties
whilst at the same time retaining the environmentally friendly properties of the match
head.
[0005] Control of the sensitivity influences the striking force required to be applied by
the user in order to ignite the match head. If it is too high, this may result in
breakage of the head, or alternatively breakage of the splint before ignition has
occurred. In addition if the strike force required is too high this may increase the
risk of accidents by flying heads or broken splints where the heads have ignited.
This is also the case with conventional match compositions that the matches may be
too difficult to ignite. Altematively if the match head is too easy to light this
may lead to premature ignition creating the danger of fires. It is possible to come
across matches having different properties and a problem is to achieve a guaranteed
consistent desired balance of the ignition sensitivity.
[0006] It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a match head formulation which
has sufficient sensitivity to guarantee consistent ignition. It is also an object
of the present invention to achieve precise control over the sensitivity of the match
head so that the desired consistency of sensitivity can be guaranteed. These objectives
are to be achieved without detriment to the other properties of the match head formulation
and which can be made by the same manufacturing techniques and without adding significantly
to the cost.
[0007] According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a match head
formulation suitable for the production of strike anywhere matches or safety matches
wherein the match head formulation comprises a component which is a chelating agent
such as EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid), citric acid, lactic acid, tartaric
acid, malic acid, or gluconic or other alpha hydroxy carboxylic acids, said chelating
agent being complexed with a metal which may be selected from the following: manganese,
Iron, cobalt, nickel, chromium, copper or vanadium.
[0008] Preferably the metal chelate is iron citrate which is preferably in the form of ammonium
iron III citrate which is soluble in water.
[0009] In a preferred embodiment of this first aspect of the present invention the density
of the formulation when in the form of a wet composition is in a range from 1.1 to
1.4 g/cm
3. Preferably the composition includes potassium chlorate present is in the range from
40 to 60 percent dry weight while the red amorphous phosphorus is present in a proportion
of up to 9 percent dry weight for strike anywhere matches and up to 2 per cent dry
weight for safety matches. Gelatine may provide a suitable binder if present in proportions
ranging from 3 to 18 percent dry weight or alternatively the binder may be in the
form of animal glue. The thickener is preferably a starch present in proportions of
up to 5 percent dry weight while feldspar or other siliceous minerals may be chosen
as the filler. The formulation may also include an ash improver, a pigment and a bleaching
agent. A foaming agent may be Arylan PWS an amine salt of an alkyl aryl sulphonic
acid present in proportions of up to 0.2 percent dry weight. The formulation may also
include an ash improver such as infusoria in proportions of up to 6 percent dry weight
or a cellulose flour such as olivestone flour in proportions of up to 7 percent dry
weight and a pigment such as iron oxide in proportions ranging from 3 to 10 percent
dry weight.
[0010] The composition may also include ferrophosphorus (a mixture of iron phosphides containing
typically between 18 and 25 percent phosphorus).
[0011] In a preferred embodiment of the invention the iron citrate is provided in the form
of ammonium iron III citrate. Alternatively the iron citrate is provided in the form
of Iron (III) citrate. Altematively the iron citrate is provided in the form of ferrous
citrate monohydrate.
[0012] In a preferred embodiment of the invention the proportion of iron citrate of the
match head composition is 0.01 % to 2.14 % by dry weight. In a further preferred embodiment
of the invention the proportion of iron citrate in the match head composition is 0.15
% to 1.5 % by dry weight. In a further preferred embodiment of the invention the proportion
of iron citrate in the match head composition is 0.4 % to 0.9 % by dry weight.
[0013] In a further preferred embodiment of the invention the proportion of phosphorus in
the match head composition in the range from 0.01 % to 9 % by dry weight.
[0014] Some examples of the present invention will now be described with reference to formulations
suitable for the production of safety matches and strike anywhere matches.
[0015] In the past match head formulations suitable for the production of strike anywhere
matches have contained phosphorus sesquisulphide compounds as the active ingredient.
Altematively phosphorus sesquisulphide may be replaced by red amorphous phosphorus.
Example 1
[0016] A match head formulation suitable for the production of strike anywhere matches is
prepared in which 48.34 percent dry weight of potassium chlorate is mixed with 12.43
percent dry weight of gelatine, 2.76 percent dry weight of starch, 20.72 percent dry
weight of feldspar, 0.35 percent dry weight of Eosin, 2.76 percent dry weight of titanium
dioxide, 6.90 percent dry weight of limestone, and 0.21 percent dry weight of sodium
dithionite ensuring good wetting and dispersion of all the ingredients before adding
5 percent dry weight of red amorphous phosphorus as an aqueous slurry and 0.57 per
cent dry weight iron citrate in the form of ammonium iron (iii) citrate.
[0017] The above formulation combines a satisfactory sensitivity and bum rate and has no
propensity to produce burning fragments or dropping of hot ash. The formulation also
provides cost benefits over other existing formulations. The sensitivity is improved
markedly when compared to formulations not comprising the iron citrate.
[0018] The water content of the above formulation may be in the range from 40 to 50g per
100g of solids but is typically 45.6g/100g solids.
[0019] The density of the formulation when in the form of a wet composition may be in the
range of 1.1 to 1.4 g/cm
3 but is typically 1.2 to 1.35 g/cm
3. This figure is lower than is usual for match head formulations of this type as a
result of being more highly aerated and contributes towards an improved sensitivity
and a faster drying rate. The formulation is thus able to dry even during freak spells
of high atmospheric humidity.
[0020] The proportions of potassium chlorate present may range from 40 to 60 percent dry
weight while the red amorphous phosphorus may be present in proportions of up to 9
and as low as 1 percent dry weight for the formulation to maintain a satisfactory
performance. The iron citrate may be present in proportions between 0.01 % and 2.5
% dry weight.
[0021] The following table shows the change in sensitivity measured in grams with increasing
amounts of Iron Citrate:
Table 1:
Strike anywhere composition with 5% Red Phosphorus |
% Iron Citrate |
0.00 |
0.15 |
0.43 |
0.87 |
1.43 |
2.14 |
Sensitivity (g) |
212 |
197 |
160 |
164 |
153 |
163 |
[0022] Equally the proportion of red phosphorus may be varied to attain the optimum level
for the amount of iron citrate.
Table 2:
Strike anywhere composition with 0.6% Iron citrate |
% Red Phosphorus |
0.00 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
Sensitivity (g) |
will not strike |
will not strike |
272 |
201 |
163 |
[0023] In the above experiments the iron citrate is provided in the form of ammonium iron
(III) citrate. Alternatively the iron citrate may be provided in the form of Iron
(III) citrate or ferrous citrate monohydrate.
[0024] The term iron citrate will be used a the general term throughout this specification
to describe chelating complexes containing iron and citrate which may not be definite
compounds. The iron content can vary widely from 15 % to 28 % depending on which form
of iron citrate is used. The water soluble complexes, for example, also contain ammonia.
The effectiveness of any particular complex depends upon and is proportional to the
iron content. The same is true if different metals are used.
[0025] The iron citrate complex may also be formed in situ by the addition of any citrate
such as for example potassium citrate to the composition and an iron salt such as
for example iron III sulphate. These two compounds will react together to form the
soluble iron citrate complex. Many other alternative compounds could be used with
the corresponding reactions producing the desired complex. This is also true for the
other complexes envisaged by the invention formed from any of the metals namely, manganese,
cobalt, nickel, chromium, copper or vanadium with the chelating agents; lactic acid,
tartaric acid, malic acid, gluconic or other alpha hydroxy carboxylic acids or EDTA.
[0026] The gelatine is present as a binder. The binder content of the formulation is lower
than is usual and consequently improves the sensitivity of the formulation as well
as the drying rate. The gelatine may be present in proportions ranging from 8 to 18
percent dry weight. In place of gelatine animal glue may provide a satisfactory binding
agent.
[0027] Starch is present as a thickener to improve the head formulation during dipping and
may be present in proportions ranging from I to 4 percent dry weight and still serve
its function satisfactorily.
[0028] Use of amorphous phosphorus makes it difficult to achieve the clear bright colours
characteristic of match head formulations based on phosphorus sesquisulphide. The
muddy colour of amorphous phosphorus in the above formulation is particularly difficult
to mask in the orange/yellow spectral region and consequently a colourant such as
Eosin may be required to be present in proportions of up to 7 percent dry weight.
An alternative colourant to produce a match head formulation in the blue/red spectral
region such as Rhodamine may not need to be present to such an extent. To assist the
colouring of the formulation sodium dithionite may be used to bleach the gelatine
while titanium dioxide may be employed as a masking agent. The titanium dioxide may
be present in proportions of up to 7 percent dry weight.
[0029] Limestone may be present in proportions ranging from 3 to 14 percent dry weight to
control the pH of the formulation while feldspar is used as a filler and serves to
make up the balance of the formulation.
[0030] It is to be noted that the above formulation is free of phosphorus sesquisulphide,
zinc oxide and di-chromates. The absence of sulphur from the formulation reduces the
smell produced on striking a match coated with the formulation. The absence of phosphorus
sesquisulphide is advantageous because it is difficult to handle during manufacture.
It is possible to include these components in the formulation in lower proportions
than conventionally used with the inclusion of iron citrate in proportions from 0.01
% to 2.5 % to improve and control the sensitivity.
[0031] In the past match head formulations suitable for the production of safety matches
have contained chromium compounds, sulphur compounds and zinc oxide and in particular
have contained potassium dichromate, sulphur powder and zinc oxide. In the second
example all these are absent from the formulation and have been replaced in the formulations
of the present invention by red amorphous phosphorus and iron citrate.
[0032] The experiments were repeated using various combinations of metal chelate complexes,
as well as the iron citrate referred to above, of citric acid, lactic acid, tartaric
acid, malic acid or EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid) as well as gluconic
acid (other alpha hydroxy carboxylic acids would also be appropriate), complexed with
manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, chromium, copper and vanadium and similar results
were obtained.
Example 2
[0033] A match head formulation suitable for the production of safety matches is prepared
in which 54.18 percent dry weight of potassium chlorate is mixed with 4.06 percent
dry weight of gelatine, 4.06 percent dry weight of starch, 20.32 percent dry weight
of feldspar, 2.71 percent dry weight of infusoria, 6.77 percent dry weight of iron
oxide, 0.09 percent dry weight of Arylan PWS, and 6.77 percent dry weight of limestone
ensuring good wetting and dispersion of all the ingredients before adding 0.5 percent
dry weight of amorphous phosphorus as an aqueous slurry and 0.5 per cent dry weight
iron (iii) citrate in the form of ammonium iron(iii) citrate.
[0034] The water content of the above formulation may be in the range 40 to 55g per 100g
of solids but is typically 48.8g /100g solids.
[0035] The density of the formulation when in the form of a wet composition may be in the
range from 1.0 to 1.4 g/cm
3 but is typically 1.15 g/cm
3. As in Example 1 this figure is lower than is usual for match head formulations of
this type as a result of being more highly aerated and contributes towards an improved
sensitivity and a faster drying rate.
[0036] It was found that the proportion of potassium chlorate present may range from 40
to 60 percent dry weight and the proportion of amorphous phosphorus may range from
0.01 to 2.0 percent dry weight for the formulation to maintain a satisfactory performance.
The proportion of iron citrate may range from 0.01 % to 2.5 % dry weight.
Example 3
[0037] A match head formulation suitable for the production of safety matches is prepared
in which 57.98 percent dry weight of potassium chlorate is mixed with 9.28 percent
dry weight of glue, 30.97 percent dry weight of an uncoloured pre-mixture of inert
materials including silica, alumino-silicates and alkaline earth carbonates, 0.09
percent dry weight of Arylan PWS, and 0.14 percent dry weight of Eosin dye before
adding 1.1 percent dry weight of amorphous phosphorus and 0.43 per cent dry weight
ammonium iron (iii) citrate. This example provides safety matches which red in colour.
Example 4
[0038] A match head formulation suitable for the production of safety matches is prepared
in which 55.93 percent dry weight of potassium chlorate is mixed with 8.95 percent
dry weight of glue, 33.56 percent dry weight of a brown pre-mixture of inert materials
including silica, alumino-silicates, alkaline earth carbonates and iron oxides (the
iron oxides functioning to provide the brown head colour), 0.08 percent dry weight
of Arylan PWS, before adding 1.06 percent dry weight of amorphous phosphorus and 0.42
per cent dry weight ammonium iron (iii) citrate. This example provides safety matches
which are brown in colour.
[0039] The following table shows the change in sensitivity measured in grams with increasing
amounts of Iron Citrate:
Table 3:
Safety composition with 0.86% Red Phosphorus |
% Iron Citrate |
0.00 |
0.15 |
0.43 |
0.87 |
1.43 |
2.14 |
Sensitivity (g) |
134 |
117 |
99 |
84 |
104 |
94 |
[0040] Equally the proportion of red phosphorus may be varied to attain the optimum level
for the amount of iron citrate.
Table 4:
Safety composition with 0.6% Iron citrate |
% Red Phosphorus |
0.00 |
0.29 |
.86 |
Sensitivity (g) |
416 |
135 |
86 |
[0041] In the above experiments the iron citrate is provided in the form of ferrous citrate
monohydrate. Alternatively the iron citrate may be provided in the form of Iron (III)
citrate or ammonium iron (III) citrate.
[0042] The gelatine is present as a binder. As in Example 1 the binder content of the formulation
is lower than is usual and consequently improves the sensitivity of the formulation
as well as the drying rate. Gelatine may be present in proportions ranging from 3
to 12 percent dry weight. In place of gelatine animal glue may provide a satisfactory
binding agent.
[0043] Again the presence of amorphous phosphorus makes it difficult to achieve clear bright
colours but does not hinder the production of standard brown formulations. To this
end iron oxide is used as a pigment and may be present in proportions ranging from
3 to 10 percent dry weight.
[0044] It is to be noted that the above formulation is free of potassium dichromate, sulphur
and zinc oxide. The absence of sulphur from the formulation reduces the smell produced
on striking a match coated with the formulation. The absence of potassium dichromate
is advantageous because potassium dichromate is difficult to handle during manufacture.
[0045] However it will be appreciated that according to the invention it is possible to
include any of these components in place of red phosphorus in lower proportions with
the addition of iron citrate. This will reduce the adverse environmental effect and
also improve the sensitivity properties. The person skilled in the art will appreciate
that the proportion of iron citrate used will vary according to the components used
in the remainder of the composition and also according to the desired final cost of
the composition.
[0046] Such safety match compositions may be formulated along the lines of the above example
to combine a satisfactory sensitivity and bum rate with no propensity to produce burning
fragments or dropping of hot ash. The formulation meets all the requirements of BS
3795 and provides cost benefits over other existing formulations.
Example 5
[0047] In order to achieve a more brightly coloured match head formulation suitable for
the production of safety matches and having properties similar to those described
with reference to Example 2 above 55.52 percent dry weight of potassium chlorate is
mixed with 4.16 percent dry weight gelatine, 4.16 percent dry weight of starch, 13.88
percent dry weight of feldspar, 5.55 percent dry weight of infusoria, 0.09 percent
dry weight of Arylan PWS, 6.94 percent dry weight of limestone, 6.94 percent dry weight
of olivestone flour, up to 7.0 percent dry weight of a chosen pigment, and 1.39 percent
dry weight of titanium dioxide ensuring good wetting and dispersion of all the ingredients
before adding 0.5 percent dry weight of amorphous phosphorus as an aqueous slurry
and 0.5 per cent dry weight of iron citrate in the form of ammonium iron (iii) citrate.
[0048] The following table shows the change in sensitivity measured in grams with increasing
amounts of Iron Citrate:
Table 5:
Safety Match 0.86 % Red Phosphorus |
% Iron Citrate |
0.00 |
0.15 |
0.43 |
0.87 |
1.43 |
2.14 |
Sensitivity (g) |
129 |
118 |
99 |
88 |
105 |
94 |
[0049] Equally the proportion of red phosphorus may be varied to attain the optimum level
for the amount of iron citrate.
Table 6:
Safety Match composition with 0.6% Iron citrate |
% Red Phosphorus |
0.00 |
0.29 |
0.86 |
Sensitivity (g) |
416 |
135 |
86 |
[0050] In the above experiments the iron citrate is provided in the form of ferrous citrate
monohydrate. Alternatively the iron citrate may be provided in the form of Iron (III)
citrate or ammonium iron (III) citrate.
[0051] This formulation is similar to that described in Example 2 above and differs essentially
only in that it may be more brightly coloured. Consequently the proportions of the
chlorate, amorphous phosphorus, gelatine, starch, infusoria, Arylan PWS, limestone,
and feldspar may vary within substantially the same ranges as disclosed in Example
2. Of the constituents not found in that Example olivestone flour acts as an ash improver
and may be present in proportions of up to 7 percent dry weight while titanium dioxide
may also be present in proportions of up to 7 percent dry weight and acts as a masking
agent as described in Example 1. Olivestone flour may be substituted by other cellulose
flours.
Example 6
[0052] The amorphous phosphorus of the formulations described in Examples 2 and 3 may be
replaced by ferrophosphorus, a mixture of iron phosphides containing typically between
18 and 25 percent phosphorus. Ferrophosphorus is relatively inexpensive and easy to
handle but is a dense black powder and therefore limits the range of colours attainable.
[0053] A match head formulation of this type suitable for the production of safety matches
is provided by mixing 52.63 percent dry weight of potassium chlorate with 3.95 percent
dry weight of gelatine, 3.95 percent dry weight of starch, 19.73 percent dry weight
of feldspar, 6.57 percent dry weight of iron oxide and 12.66 percent dry weight of
ferrophosphorus and 0.5 per cent dry weight iron citrate.
[0054] The following table shows the change in sensitivity measured in grams with increasing
amounts of Iron Citrate:
Table 7:
Safety composition with 12% Ferrophosphorus |
% Iron Citrate |
0.00 |
0.15 |
0.43 |
0.87 |
1.43 |
2.14 |
Sensitivity (g) |
128 |
115 |
97 |
84 |
101 |
93 |
[0055] In the above experiments the iron citrate is provided in the form of ferrous citrate
monohydrate. Alternatively the iron citrate may be provided in the form of Iron (III)
citrate or ammonium iron (III) citrate.
[0056] The experiments were repeated using various combinations of metal chelate complexes
of citric acid, lactic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid or EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra-acetic
acid) as well as gluconic acid (other alpha hydroxy carboxylic acids would also be
appropriate), complexed with manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, chromium, copper and
vanadium and similar results were obtained.
[0057] The ferrophosphorus is preferably ground to a particle size of up to 100 microns.
The preferred size for the formulation given in example 6 is less than 5 microns.
It is to be noted that with a particle size between 20 and 65 microns it is possible
to produce a composition with a colour other than black by using dyes. Ferrophosphorus
in this range of particle size has been found to be beneficial in a range of pyrotechnic
applications.
[0058] While it was found that the proportion of potassium chlorate present may range from
40 to 60 percent dry weight the proportion of ferrophosphorus was required to exceed
5 percent dry weight in order to maintain a satisfactory performance.
[0059] The proportion of gelatine present in the formulation was found to be able to range
from 3 to 12 percent dry weight while the starch could be present in proportions of
up to 10 percent dry weight. As in previous examples feldspar is used as a filler
and serves to make up the balance of the formulation.
[0060] If despite the nature of ferrophosphorus a more brightly coloured formulation is
required the iron oxide may be omitted and replaced by titanium dioxide and a suitable
pigment each in proportions of up to 7 percent dry weight.
[0061] It will be understood that it may be possible in all the above examples to include
higher amounts of iron citrate, or the metal chelate complex concemed, which may not
improve the sensitivity nor adversely effect the properties of the composition in
other ways but would add unnecessarily to the cost of the formulation.
[0062] Of all the metal chelate complexes, iron citrate was shown to be effective as a controller
of the sensitivity of the match head composition and also is the most environmentally
friendly and the most cost effective.
1. A match head formulation suitable for the production of strike anywhere matches or
safety matches wherein the match head formulation comprises a component which is a
chelating agent such as EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid), citric acid, lactic
acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, or gluconic or other alpha hydroxy carboxylic acids,
said chelating agent being complexed with a metal which may be selected from the following:
manganese, Iron, cobalt, nickel, chromium, copper or vanadium.
2. A match head formulation according to claim 1, characterised in that the metal chelate
complex is iron citrate.
3. A match head formulation according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that it comprises
potassium chlorate and red amorphous phosphorus, the balance being made up of a binder,
a thickener, a filler, and a foaming agent to the exclusion of phosphorous sesquisulphide.
4. A match head formulation in accordance with any of the preceding claims 2 to 5, characterised
in that the iron citrate is provided in the form of ferrous citrate monohydrate.
5. A match head formulation in accordance with any of the preceding claims 2 to 5, characterised
in that the iron citrate is provided in the form of Iron (III) citrate.
6. A match head formulation in accordance with any of the preceding claims 2 to 5, characterised
in that the iron citrate is provided in the form of ammonium iron (III) citrate.
7. A match head formulated in accordance with any of the preceding claims 1 to 5, characterised
in that the metal chelate complex is formed in situ by adding a chelate compound,
such as potassium citrate, with a metal salt, such as iron III sulphate, said chelate
compound and metal salt reacting together when added to the composition to form the
desired metal chelate.
8. A match head formulation in accordance with claim 1, characterised in that the proportion
of the metal complex of the match head composition is 0.01 % to 2.14 % by dry weight.
9. A match head formulation in accordance with claim 1, characterised in that the proportion
of the metal complex of the match head composition is 0.15 % to 1.5 % by dry weight.
10. A match head formulation in accordance with claim 1, characterised in that the proportion
of the metal complex of the match head composition is 0.4 % to 0.9 % by dry weight.