[0001] The invention relates to a flame extinguisher for a free-head sewer.
[0002] Sewers are generally used in the form of a pipe system for the discharge of waste
liquids from domestic, built-up and industrial environments; two main types can be
distinguished. The first type is the flooded sewer, characterised by the fact that
the sewer is at any moment entirely filled with liquid. This calls for special provisions
such as pumps and buffers for dealing with fluctuations in the supply. The second
type is the free-head sewer, in which the flow is maintained by differences in height
in the pipe system. This type does not require extra provisions like the first-mentioned
type. In the case of free-head sewers, the pipes are for a substantial part of the
time, depending on the supply of waste liquid, not entirely filled with liquid. A
layer of gas or vapour is then present above the liquid. In many cases this layer
of gas consists substantially of air, but in domestic sewers rotting processes may
lead to the formation of combustible and explosive gases. In industrial waste streams,
too, the risk of vapour formation in the discharging sewer system as a result of the
presence of combustible substances therein cannot be excluded. Chance ignition of
a combustible or explosive gas or vapour mixture in a sewer system may lead to fire
or explosion, which may then propagate through the sewer and spread over a large area.
This may lead to major hazards and considerable damage. In an industrial environment
a disaster at a certain point may be the cause of a fire or explosion, which may then
propagate through the sewer system to different locations and may there, too, lead
to hazardous situations.
[0003] There is therefore a need for provisions for preventing the propagation of fire and
explosions through free-head sewers.
[0004] The invention now meets this need because the flame extinguisher comprises two vertical
containers, each having a connection to a sewer pipe, which are connected in a communicating
manner by a connecting pipe, which in each of the containers has an outlet at a lower
level than the connection to the sewer pipe in the container concerned, the area of
a perpendicular cross-section of the connecting pipe being at most 50% of the area
of a perpendicular cross-section of each of the containers and the difference in height
between the lowest point of the connection to the sewer pipe and the highest point
of the connecting pipe's outlet being at least 0.3 m in each container.
[0005] Such a flame extinguisher incorporated in a sewer pipe proves to be capable of preventing
the propagation of fire phenomena entering the flame extinguisher via one of the connections
to the sewer pipe, via the other connection to a further part of the sewer system.
This proves to apply both for brief, intensive phenomena occurring in the system such
as explosions or detonations and for slower, relatively long-term non-explosive fire
phenomena. With the fire extinguishers according to the invention a sewer system can
be split up into compartments that are separated from one another for explosions and
fire phenomena. For a person skilled in the art it is clear that the invention may
also be embodied in systems comprising several supply or discharge sewer pipes, which
are each connected to their own container, with which more connecting pipes than the
connection between the containers provide the desired configuration.
[0006] The flame extinguisher according to the invention is incorporated in a horizontal
part of a generally underground - sewer pipe and connects the supplying part of the
sewer pipe to the discharging part thereof. The terms 'supplying' and 'discharging'
here relate to the normal flow direction of the liquid through the sewer seen from
the flame extinguisher. The supplying and discharging parts of the pipe are each connected
to one of the flame extinguisher's containers. The container extends vertically above
and beneath the sewer pipe. The top of the container is preferably at ground level,
and can at the top end be sealed with a cover, rendering the interior of the container
accessible for inspection and cleaning operations. There may also be a vent to the
atmosphere. The bottom of the container lies at a lower level than the sewer pipe
and the container hence constitutes a reservoir for the liquid flowing from the supplying
part of the sewer pipe. The container's shape is not of essential importance and may
be for example round, square or polygonal. The diameter or the smallest side of the
container is preferably at least 0.3 m larger than the corresponding dimension of
the supply or discharge pipe when the latter is between 0.2 and 0.6 m, and at least
0.4 m larger in the case of sewers with pipe diameters exceeding 0.6 m. The two containers
need not be the same, but if the flame extinguisher is to work in both directions,
each container must per se meet the requirements imposed with respect to this in the
present application. This holds both for the absolute dimensions and for the dimensions
related to the supply or discharge pipe connected to the container.
[0007] Suitable materials for the container are for example metals, such as iron, steel
or aluminium, concrete, stone and plastic. The most important requirement imposed
on the container's material is resistance to a long residence time underground and
to the substances to be discharged via the sewer.
[0008] The two containers are connected by a connecting pipe and hence constitute a system
of two communicating vessels. The area of a perpendicular cross-section of the connecting
pipe is preferably smaller than that of the supply sewer pipe. The length of the connecting
pipe is not critical, but is preferably at least 0.5 times, and more preferably at
least twice, the diameter of the container. The connecting pipe's connections to the
containers are preferably angular, which is understood to mean not curved and not
rounded. This proves to improve the flame-extinguishing properties. The connecting
pipe is preferably straight, because such a pipe proves to show a higher resistance
to flame transfer from one container to the other than for example a curved pipe.
The container preferably extends to below the bottom of the connecting pipe's outlet.
The distance from said bottom to the container's base is preferably at least 0.1 times,
and more preferably at least 0.2 and even 0.5 times, the container's diameter or smallest
dimension. The presence of an amount of sewer liquid below the lowest point of the
connecting pipe's outlet proves to provide better flame extinction. It is suspected
that such a structure will cause inflowing gas bubbles to split up into smaller bubbles
than in a structure in which no liquid is present below the level of said outlet.
The application of irregularities in the connecting pipe's wall, for example in the
form of ridges or teeth, proves to have a comparable favourable effect.
[0009] The supplying and discharging parts of the sewer pipe are connected to one another
by the containers and the connecting pipe. The liquid that flows from the supply pipe
into one of the containers flows through the connecting pipe into the other container
and, when the level in that container becomes sufficiently high, out of the other
container into the discharging part of the sewer pipe. Because the lowest point of
the connection to the sewer pipe lies at a higher level than the highest point of
the connecting pipe's outlet, the supplying and discharging parts of the sewer pipe
are separated from one another by a liquid plug which fills the connecting pipe and
the lowest parts of the containers. It has been found that the difference in height
between said highest and lowest points must be at least 0.3 m for the flame extinguisher
to perform its flame- and explosion-extinguishing function as required. Preferably
this difference in height is at least 0.5 m.
[0010] In a normally operating sewer system the area between said highest and lowest points
will be entirely filled with liquid. If for some time no or little liquid is supplied
through the sewer, the liquid level may become lower, for example as a result of evaporation.
For the flame extinguisher to perform efficiently, the liquid level may not drop to
a level less than 0.15 m above the highest point of the connecting pipe's outlet.
Preferably this minimum level is at least 0.25 m. In a sewer that involves a risk
of explosion or fire it will hence have to be ensured that sufficient liquid is supplied
to maintain the liquid level required for efficient performance of the flame extinguisher.
[0011] If a non-explosive fire should now break out for example in the supplying part of
the sewer pipe, it will also propagate in the direction of the flame extinguisher.
The gases released in the combustion and the heat produced by the combustion will
force the gases present in the sewer pipe between the flame front and the flame extinguisher
in the direction of the flame extinguisher. These gases, which will not be burning
at first, will exert pressure on the surface of the liquid in the container on the
side of the flame extinguisher facing the fire. This surface will consequently be
pressed down, as a result of which the surface in the other container will rise, and
a portion of the liquid present there will flow into the sewer pipe connected to this
container. If the surface of the liquid in the first container has now been pressed
down so far that the highest point of the connecting pipe's outlet comes to lie above
the surface of the liquid in one container, the inflowing gas will be forced to the
other container via the connecting pipe. It has been found that this non-burning gas
will rise through the liquid present in the second container, forming bubbles in the
process. When the gas reaches the surface of the liquid it will enter the free area
above the surface of the liquid and from there the sewer. At a certain moment the
flame front may reach the other container via the open area in the connecting pipe.
At that moment all the non-combusted gas has already been expelled, as described above.
The burning gas at the flame front then proves to rise through the liquid as it flows
into the second container, disintegrating into bubbles, just like the non-burning
gas. If the liquid level in the other container meets the requirements imposed above,
the combustion will be extinguished during the formation of the bubbles and the further
rising through the liquid. The first burning gas hence arrives non-burning and cooled
at the surface of the liquid in the other container and proves to be incapable of
igniting the gas present there. This ensures that the combustion phenomena cannot
pass the flame extinguisher.
[0012] If combustion phenomena of an explosive character occur on one side of the flame
extinguisher, the liquid mass in the flame extinguisher according to the invention
having the critical dimensioning described above proves to possess a resistance to
rapid displacements such that it constitutes a very great resistance to the shock
wave accompanying explosive combustion. The shock wave proves to be virtually completely
reflected by the surface of the liquid and no, or virtually no, gas transport takes
place through the connecting pipe between the two containers. The small amount of
burning gas that may after all reach the other container via the connecting pipe proves
to be split up into bubbles as described above and to extinguish on its way up through
the liquid.
[0013] The flame extinguisher according to the invention thus constitutes an effective barrier
against combustion phenomena, ensuring that these phenomena are isolated in the part
of a sewer in which they originated.
[0014] The invention will be elucidated will reference to the following figures, in which
Fig. 1 is a vertical cross-section of a flame extinguisher according to the invention
in the case of regular flow and Fig.2 is the same flame extinguisher in which the
liquid in one container has been pressed down to just below the top of the connecting
pipe.
[0015] In Fig. 1, 1 is a supply pipe of a sewer that is connected to a container 2. This
container 2 is connected to a second container 4 via a connecting pipe 3. Container
4 is connected to discharging sewer pipe 5. The containers have covers 6 and 7, whose
tops are flush with ground level 8. The lowest parts 9 and 10 of containers 2 and
4 and connecting pipe 3 are filled with liquid to the surfaces of the liquid 11 and
12. The bases 13 and 14 of the containers 2 and 4 are at a lower level than the bottom
15 of connecting pipe 3, as a result of which an amount of liquid is present in both
containers below the lowest point of the connecting pipe.
[0016] Fig. 2 shows the situation in which the surface of the liquid 11 in container 2 has
been pressed down to below the top of the connecting pipe 3. Consequently, gas can
flow in the direction indicated by arrow 17 to container 4, where it disintegrates
into bubbles 18, which are discharged in an extinguished and cooled condition to sewer
pipe 5.
[0017] It is clear from both figures that the flame extinguisher has a symmetrical design
and performs its function irrespective of the direction from which the combustion
phenomena arrive. As already indicated above, a symmetrical design is in fact not
necessary for efficient performance in two directions.
[0018] The invention will be further elucidated with reference to the following examples.
Example I
[0019] The flame-extinguishing properties were tested of a flame extinguisher as shown in
Figure 1 having the following dimensions:
- diameters of sewer pipes 1 and 5: 600 mm;
- diameters of containers 2 and 4: 1200 mm;
- diameter and length of connecting pipe 3: 600 and 1000 mm, resp.
- distance from bottom of supply pipes to top 16 of connecting pipe: 1000 mm;
- distance from bottom 15 of connecting pipe to bases 13 and 14 of the containers: 200
mm;
- total height of containers: 3500 mm.
[0020] The flame extinguisher was filled with water up to the bottom of pipes 1 and 5. The
area between the surface of the liquid and the covers 6 and 7 was filled with an explosive
mixture of propane and air. The mixture in one, first, container was ignited and it
was investigated whether the mixture in the other, second, container would also be
ignited. The sewer pipe was blinded on the first side to prevent the discharge of
pressure from the flame extinguisher. Water and gas could be freely discharged on
the second side. The tests were carried out at different propane-air ratios of 4:96,
6.5:93.5 and 7.5:92.5. Each of the tests was carried out both by igniting the propane-air
mixture at the top of the first container and immediately above the surface of the
liquid. A same series of tests was carried out with the difference that the containers
were now filled with water to a level 250 mm above the top 16 of the connecting pipe.
In this second series only the situation in which the gas mixture was ignited immediately
above the surface of the water was investigated, which situation had emerged as the
most critical case from the first series. All the tests were carried out in three-fold.
In all cases the explosive mixture in the second container was not ignited and the
flame extinguisher thus prevented propagation of the explosion.
[0021] As the propane concentration decreased, the rate at which the pressure in the first
container built up and the ultimate maximum pressure on the surface of the water proved
to increase, but in all cases the connecting pipe proved to remain virtually entirely
filled with water and the other container up to the bottom of the sewer pipe, and
the burning gas mixture forced to the other container was effectively extinguished.
Ignition of the explosive mixture immediately above the surface of the water proved
to lead to a higher pressure build-up than ignition immediately beneath the cover.
When the mixture is ignited beneath the cover, a portion of the mixture escapes uncombusted
to the other container and then no longer takes part in the combustion.
[0022] With the lower water level the pressure build-up proved to be substantially smaller
than with a maximally filled container, probably because the burning gas mixture could
flow more easily to the other container owing to the smaller water column through
which it had to travel. The water level of 250 mm in each container however proved
sufficient to effectively extinguish the burning gas mixture.
Example II
[0023] The flame extinguisher of Example I was on the side blinded in that example fitted
with a 20-metre-long sewer pipe with a diameter of 600 mm, which was entirely filled
with a propane-air mixture, like the flame extinguisher itself. The concentrations
in the various tests were as in Example I. The mixture was each time ignited at the
end furthest removed from the container. It was found that when the propane concentration
decreased, the propagation rate of the flame increased, even to 100 m/s. The flame
extinguisher proved effective under all the tested conditions and it was found that
no transfer of the combustion to the other container took place.
1. Flame extinguisher for a free-head sewer comprising two vertical containers, each
having a connection to a sewer pipe, which are connected in a communicating manner
by a connecting pipe, which in each of the containers has an outlet at a lower level
than the connection to the sewer pipe in the container concerned, the area of a perpendicular
cross-section of the connecting pipe being at most 50% of the area of a perpendicular
cross-section of each of the containers and the difference in height between the lowest
point of the connection to the sewer pipe and the highest point of the connecting
pipe's outlet being at least 0.3 m in each container.
2. Flame extinguisher according to Claim 1, with the difference in height being at least
0.5 m.
3. Flame extinguisher according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, with the container extending to
below the bottom of the connecting pipe's outlet.