[0001] The present invention relates to coated detergent tablets, especially those adapted
for use in washing machines, and to processes for making the coated detergent tablets.
[0002] Although cleaning compositions in tablet form have often been proposed, these have
not (with the exception of soap bars for personal washing) gained any substantial
success, despite the several advantages of products in a unit dispensing form. One
of the reasons for this may be that detergent tablets require a relatively complex
manufacturing process. In particular, it is often desirable to provide the tablet
with a coating and this adds to the difficulties of manufacture.
While tablets without a coating are entirely effective in use, they usually lack the
necessary surface hardness to withstand the abrasion that is a part of normal manufacture,
packaging and handling. The result is that uncoated tablets suffer from abrasion during
these processes, resulting in chipped tablets and loss of active material.
[0003] Finally, coating of tablets is often desired for aesthetic reasons, to improve the
outer appearance of the tablet or to achieve some particular aesthetic effect.
[0004] Numerous methods of tablet coating have been proposed, and many of these have been
suggested for detergent tablets. However, all of these methods have certain disadvantages,
as will be explained below.
[0005] GB-A-0 989 683, published on 22nd April 1965, discloses a process for preparing a
particulate detergent from surfactants and inorganic salts; spraying on water-soluble
silicate; and pressing the detergent particles into a solid form-retaining tablet.
Finally a readily water-soluble organic film-forming polymer (for example, polyvinyl
alcohol) provides a coating to make the detergent tablet resistant to abrasion and
accidental breakage.
[0006] EP-A-0 002 293, published on 13th June 1979, discloses a tablet coating comprising
hydrated salt such as acetate, metaborate, orthophosphate, tartrate, and sulphate.
[0007] EP-A-0 716 144, published on 12th June 1996, also discloses laundry detergent tablets
with water-soluble coatings which may be organic polymers including acrylic/maleic
co-polymer, polyethylene glycol, PVPVA, and sugar.
[0008] WO9518215, published on 6th July 1995, provides water-insoluble coatings for solid
cast tablets. The tablets are provided with hydrophobic coatings including wax, fatty
acid, fatty acid amides, and polyethylene glycol.
[0009] A disadvantage of the prior art disclosures is that a coating which is thick enough
and strong enough to withstand abrasion, also tends to be slow to break up or dissolve
in use.
[0010] The present invention provides a means by which tablets with a core which is formed
by compressing a particulate material, the particulate material comprising surfactant
and detergent builder, can be provided with a hard, thin, coating so that they can
be stored, shipped and handled, but the coating is broken when the tablet is in the
washing machine exposing the soft core which breaks up easily and rapidly, releasing
the active ingredients into the wash solution.
[0011] The objective of the present invention is to provide a tablet which completely disintegrates
and disperses, in particular in alkaline or surfactant-rich solutions such as the
wash liquor.
Summary of the Invention
[0012] The object of the present invention is achieved by providing a tablet which further
comprises a disintegrant, at least some of the disintegrant being in the coating.
It is preferred that the tablet further comprises an effervescent, for example a soluble
acid source and an alkali metal carbonate.
[0013] In a further aspect of the invention there is provided a process for making a tablet
comprising the steps of :
(a) forming a core by compressing a particulate material, the particulate material
comprising surfactant and detergent builder;
(b) applying a coating material to the core, the coating material being in the form
of a melt;
(c) allowing the molten coating material to solidify; wherein the coating material
comprises a disintegrant.
Preferably the coating materials have a melting point in the range of from 40 °C
to 200 °C.
[0014] In an alternative to this embodiment of the invention there is provided a process
for making a tablet comprising the steps of :
(a) forming a core by compressing a particulate material, the particulate material
comprising surfactant and detergent builder;
(b) applying a coating material to the core, the coating material being dissolved
in a solvent;
(c) allowing the solvent to evaporate; wherein the coating material comprises a disintegrant.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0015] Tablets to be coated in the present invention can be prepared simply by mixing the
solid ingredients together and compressing the mixture in a conventional tablet press
as used, for example, in the pharmaceutical industry. Any liquid ingredients, for
example the surfactant or suds suppressor, can be incorporated in a conventional manner
into the solid particulate ingredients. Preferably the principal ingredients, are
used in particulate form.
In particular for laundry tablets, the ingredients such as builder and surfactant
can be spray-dried in a conventional manner and then compacted at a suitable pressure.
The detergent tablets can be made in any size or shape and can, if desired, be surface
treated before coating, according to the present invention. In the core of the tablet
is included a surfactant and a builder which normally provides a substantial part
of the cleaning power of the tablet. The term "builder" is intended to mean all materials
which tend to remove calcium ion from solution, either by ion exchange, complexation,
sequestration or precipitation.
[0016] The particulate material used for making the tablet of this invention can be made
by any particulation or granulation process. An example of such a process is spray
drying (in a co-current or counter current spray drying tower) which typically gives
low bulk densities 600g/l or lower. Particulate materials of higher density can be
prepared by granulation and densification in a high shear batch mixer/granulator or
by a continuous granulation and densification process (e.g. using Lodige® CB and/or
Lodige® KM mixers). Other suitable processes include fluid bed processes, compaction
processes (e.g. roll compaction), extrusion, as well as any particulate material made
by any chemical process like flocculation, crystallisation sentering, etc. Individual
particles can also be any other particle, granule, sphere or grain.
[0017] The particulate materials may be mixed together by any conventional means. Batch
is suitable in, for example, a concrete mixer, Nauta mixer, ribbon mixer or any other.
Alternatively the mixing process may be carried out continuously by metering each
component by weight on to a moving belt, and blending them in one or more drum(s)
or mixer(s). A liquid spray-on to the mix of particulate materials (e.g. non-ionic
surfactants) may be carried out. Other liquid ingredients may also be sprayed on to
the mix of particulate materials either separately or premixed. For example perfume
and slurries of optical brighteners may be sprayed. A finely divided flow aid (dusting
agent such as zeolites, carbonates, silicas) can be added to the particulate materials
after spraying the non-ionic, preferably towards the end of the process, to make the
mix less sticky.
[0018] The tablets may be manufactured by using any compacting process, such as tabletting,
briquetting, or extrusion, preferably tabletting. Suitable equipment includes a standard
single stroke or a rotary press (such as Courtoy®, Korch®, Manesty®, or Bonals®).
The tablets prepared according to this invention preferably have a diameter of between
40mm and 50mm, and a weight between 25 and 60 g. The compaction pressure used for
preparing these tablets need not exceed 5000 kN/m

, preferably not exceed 3000 kN/m

, and most preferably not exceed 1000 kN/m

.
[0019] According to the present invention, the tablets are then coated with a coating so
that the tablet does not absorb moisture, or absorbs moisture at only a very slow
rate. The coating is also strong so that moderate mechanical shocks to which the tablets
are subjected during handling, packing and shipping result in no more than very low
levels of breakage or attrition. Finally the coating is preferably brittle so that
the tablet breaks up when subjected to stronger mechanical shock. Furthermore it is
advantageous if the coating material is dissolved under alkaline conditions, or is
readily emulsified by surfactants. This avoids the deposition of undissolved particles
or lumps of coating material on the laundry load. This may be important when the coating
material is completely insoluble (for example less than 1 g/l) in water.
[0020] As defined herein "substantially insoluble" means having a very low solubility in
water. This should be understood to mean having a solubility in water at 25°C of less
than 20 g/L, preferably less than 5 g/l, and more preferably less than 1 g/l. Water
solubility is measured following the test protocol of ASTM E1148-87 entitled, "Standard
Test Method for Measurements of Aqueous Solubility".
[0021] Suitable coating materials are fatty acids, C2-C13 dicarboxylic acids, fatty alcohols,
diols, esters and ethers. Preferred fatty acids are those having a carbon chain length
of from C12 to C22 and most preferably from C18 to C22. Preferred dicarboxylic acids
are oxalic acid (C2), malonic acid (C3), succinic acid (C4), glutaric acid (C5), adipic
acid (C6), pimelic acid (C7), suberic acid (C8), azelaic acid (C9), sebacic acid (C10),
undecanedioic acid (C11), dodecanedioic acid (C12) and tridecanedioic acid (C13).
Preferred fatty alcohols are those having a carbon chain length of from C12 to C22
and most preferably from C14 to C18. Preferred diols are 1,2-octadecanediol and 1,2-hexadecanediol.
Preferred esters are tristearin, tripalmitin, methylbehenate, ethylstearate. Preferred
ethers are diethyleneglycol mono hexadecylether, diethyleneglycol mono octadecylether,
diethyleneglycol mono 0tetradecylether, phenylether, ethyl naphtyl ether, 2 methoxynaphtalene,
beta naphtyl methyl ether and glycerol monooctadecylether. Other preferred coating
materials include dimethyl 2,2 propanol, 2 hexadecanol, 2 octadecanone, 2 hexadecanone,
2, 15 hexadecanedione and 2 hydroxybenzyl alcohol.
[0022] However the detergent tablets are prepared and in whatever from they are, they are
then coated according to the present invention with a coating material having a melting
point preferably of from 40 °C to 200 °C.
The coating can be applied in a number of ways. Two preferred coating methods are
a) coating with a molten material and b) coating with a solution of the material.
In a), the coating material is applied at a temperature above its melting point, and
solidifies on the tablet. In b), the coating is applied as a solution, the solvent
being dried to leave a coherent coating. The substantially insoluble material can
be applied to the tablet by, for example, spraying or dipping. Normally when the molten
material is sprayed on to the tablet, it will rapidly solidify to form a coherent
coating. When tablets are dipped into the molten material and then removed, the rapid
cooling again causes rapid solidification of the coating material. Clearly substantially
insoluble materials having a melting point below 40 °C are not sufficiently solid
at ambient temperatures and it has been found that materials having a melting point
above about 200 °C are not practicable to use. Preferably, the materials melt in the
range from 60 °C to 160 °C, more preferably from 70 °C to 120 °C.
By "melting point" is meant the temperature at which the material when heated slowly
in, for example, a capillary tube becomes a clear liquid.
[0023] A coating of any desired thickness can be applied according to the present invention.
For most purposes, the coating forms from 1% to 10%, preferably from 1.5% to 5%, of
the tablet weight.
[0024] The tablet coatings of the present invention are very hard and provide extra strength
to the tablet.
[0025] In the present invention the fracture of the coating in the wash is improved by adding
a disintegrant in the coating. This disintegrant will swell once in contact with water
and break the coating in small pieces. This will improve the dissolution of the coating
in the wash solution. The disintegrant is suspended in the coating melt at a level
of up to 30%, preferably between 5 and 20%, and most preferably between 5 and 10%
by weight.
Possible disintegrants are described in Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients (1986).
Examples of suitable disintegrants include starch: natural, modified or pregelatinized
starch, sodium starch gluconate; gum: agar gum, guar gum, locust bean gum, karaya
gum, pectin gum, tragacanth gum; croscarmylose Sodium, crospovidone, cellulose, carboxymethyl
cellulose, algenic acid and its salts including sodium alginate, silicone dioxide,
clay, polyvinylpyrrolidone, soy polysacharides, ion exchange resins and mixtures thereof.
[0026] Depending on the composition of the starting material, and the shape of the tablets,
the used compaction force will be adjusted to not affect the strength (Diametral Fracture
Stress), and the disintegration time in the washing machine. This process may be used
to prepare homogenous or layered tablets of any size or shape.
[0027] Diametrical Fracture Stress (DFS) is a way to express the strength of a tablet, it
is determined by the following equation :
Where F is the maximum force (Newton) to cause tensile failure (fracture) measured
by a VK 200 tablet hardness tester supplied by Van Kell industries, Inc. D is the
diameter of the tablet, and t the thickness of the tablet. (Method Pharmaceutical
Dosage Forms : Tablets Volume 2 Page 213 to 217)
[0028] The rate of disintegration of a detergent tablet can be determined in two ways :
a) In a "VAN KEL" Friabilator with "Vankel Type" drums.
- Put 2 tablets with a known weight and D.F.S in the Friabilator drum.
- Rotate the drum for 20 rotations.
- Collect all product and remaining tablet pieces from the Friabilator drum, and screen
it on 5 mm, and through 1.7 mm
- Express as % residue on 5 mm and through 1.7 mm.
- The higher the % of material through 1.7 mm the better the disintegration.
b) In a washing machine according to the following method
- Take two tablets with a known weight and fracture stress, and put them at the bottom
of a washing machine (i.e. a Bauknecht WA 950).
- Put a 3 kg mixed load on top of the tablets.
- Run a 30 °C short cycle (program 4) with city water.
- Stop the cycle after 5 min and check the wash load for undissolved tablet pieces,
collect and weigh them, and record the percent residue left.
[0029] In another preferred embodiment of the present invention the tablets further comprises
an effervescent.
Effervescency as defined herein means the evolution of bubbles of gas from a liquid,
as the result of a chemical reaction between a soluble acid source and an alkali metal
carbonate, to produce carbon dioxide gas, i.e.

Further examples of acid and carbonate sources and other effervescent systems may
be found in : (Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms : Tablets Volume 1 Page 287 to 291)
An effervescent may be added to the tablet mix in addition to the detergent ingredients.
The addition of this effervescent to the detergent tablet improves the disintegration
time of the tablet. The amount will preferably be between 5 and 20 % and most preferably
between 10 and 20% by weight of the tablet. Preferably the effervescent should be
added as an agglomerate of the different particles or as a compact, and not as separated
particles.
Due to the gas created by the effervescency in the tablet, the tablet can have a higher
D.F.S. and still have the same disintegration time as a tablet without effervescency.
When the D.F.S. of the tablet with effervescency is kept the same as a tablet without,
the disintegration of the tablet with effervescency will be faster.
Detersive surfactants
[0030] Nonlimiting examples of surfactants useful herein typically at levels from about
1% to about 55%, by weight, include the conventional C
11-C
18 alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS") and primary, branched-chain and random C
10-C
20 alkyl sulfates ("AS"), the C
10-C
18 secondary (2,3) alkyl sulfates of the formula CH
3(CH
2)
x(CHOSO
3-M
+) CH
3 and CH
3 (CH
2)
y(CHOSO
3-M
+) CH
2CH
3 where x and (y + 1) are integers of at least about 7, preferably at least about 9,
and M is a water-solubilizing cation, especially sodium, unsaturated sulfates such
as oleyl sulfate, the C
10-C
18 alkyl alkoxy sulfates ("AE
xS"; especially EO 1-7 ethoxy sulfates), C
10-C
18 alkyl alkoxy carboxylates (especially the EO 1-5 ethoxycarboxylates), the C
10-18 glycerol ethers, the C
10-C
18 alkyl polyglycosides and their corresponding sulfated polyglycosides, and C
12-C
18 alpha-sulfonated fatty acid esters. If desired, the conventional nonionic and amphoteric
surfactants such as the C
12-C
18 alkyl ethoxylates ("AE") including the so-called narrow peaked alkyl ethoxylates
and C
6-C
12 alkyl phenol alkoxylates (especially ethoxylates and mixed ethoxy/propoxy), C
12-C
18 betaines and sulfobetaines ("sultaines"), C
10-C
18 amine oxides, and the like, can also be included in the overall compositions. The
C
10-C
18 N-alkyl polyhydroxy fatty acid amides can also be used. Typical examples include
the C
12-C
18 N-methylglucamides. See WO 9,206,154. Other sugar-derived surfactants include the
N-alkoxy polyhydroxy fatty acid amides, such as C
10-C
18 N-(3-methoxypropyl) glucamide. The N-propyl through N-hexyl C
12-C
18 glucamides can be used for low sudsing. C
10-C
20 conventional soaps may also be used. If high sudsing is desired, the branched-chain
C
10-C
16 soaps may be used. Mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants are especially useful.
Other conventional useful surfactants are listed in standard texts.
Builders
[0031] Detergent builders can optionally be included in the compositions herein to assist
in controlling mineral hardness. Inorganic as well as organic builders can be used.
Builders are typically used in fabric laundering compositions to assist in the removal
of particulate soils. The level of builder can vary widely depending upon the end
use of the composition.
Inorganic or P-containing detergent builders include, but are not limited to, the
alkali metal, ammonium and alkanolammonium salts of polyphosphates (exemplified by
the tripolyphosphates, pyrophosphates, and glassy polymeric meta-phosphates), phosphonates,
phytic acid, silicates, carbonates (including bicarbonates and sesquicarbonates),
sulphates, and aluminosilicates. However, non-phosphate builders are required in some
locales. Importantly, the compositions herein function surprisingly well even in the
presence of the so-called "weak" builders (as compared with phosphates) such as citrate,
or in the so-called "underbuilt" situation that may occur with zeolite or layered
silicate builders.
[0032] Examples of silicate builders are the alkali metal silicates, particularly those
having a SiO
2:Na
2O ratio in the range 1.6:1 to 3.2:1 and layered silicates, such as the layered sodium
silicates described in U.S. Patent 4,664,839, issued May 12, 1987 to H. P. Rieck.
NaSKS-6 is the trademark for a crystalline layered silicate marketed by Hoechst (commonly
abbreviated herein as "SKS-6"). Unlike zeolite builders, the Na SKS-6 silicate builder
does not contain aluminum. NaSKS-6 has the delta-Na
2SiO
5 morphology form of layered silicate. It can be prepared by methods such as those
described in German DE-A-3,417,649 and DE-A-3,742,043. SKS-6 is a highly preferred
layered silicate for use herein, but other such layered silicates, such as those having
the general formula NaMSi
xO
2x+1·yH
2O wherein M is sodium or hydrogen, x is a number from 1.9 to 4, preferably 2, and
y is a number from 0 to 20, preferably 0 can be used herein. Various other layered
silicates from Hoechst include NaSKS-5, NaSKS-7 and NaSKS-11, as the alpha, beta and
gamma forms. As noted above, the delta-Na
2SiO
5 (NaSKS-6 form) is most preferred for use herein. Other silicates may also be useful
such as for example magnesium silicate, which can serve as a crispening agent in granular
formulations, as a stabilizing agent for oxygen bleaches, and as a component of suds
control systems.
Examples of carbonate builders are the alkaline earth and alkali metal carbonates
as disclosed in German Patent Application No. 2,321,001 published on November 15,
1973.
[0033] Aluminosilicate builders are useful in the present invention. Aluminosilicate builders
are of great importance in most currently marketed heavy duty granular detergent compositions,
and can also be a significant builder ingredient in liquid detergent formulations.
Aluminosilicate builders include those having the empirical formula:
M
z(zAlO
2)
y]·xH
2O
wherein z and y are integers of at least 6, the molar ratio of z to y is in the range
from 1.0 to about 0.5, and x is an integer from about 15 to about 264.
Useful aluminosilicate ion exchange materials are commercially available. These aluminosilicates
can be crystalline or amorphous in structure and can be naturally-occurring aluminosilicates
or synthetically derived. A method for producing aluminosilicate ion exchange materials
is disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,985,669, Krummel, et al, issued October 12, 1976. Preferred
synthetic crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials useful herein are available
under the designations Zeolite A, Zeolite P (B), Zeolite MAP and Zeolite X. In an
especially preferred embodiment, the crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange material
has the formula:
Na
12[(AlO
2)
12(SiO
2)
12]·xH
2O
wherein x is from about 20 to about 30, especially about 27. This material is known
as Zeolite A. Dehydrated zeolites (x = 0 - 10) may also be used herein. Preferably,
the aluminosilicate has a particle size of about 0.1-10 microns in diameter.
Organic detergent builders suitable for the purposes of the present invention include,
but are not restricted to, a wide variety of polycarboxylate compounds. As used herein,
"polycarboxylate" refers to compounds having a plurality of carboxylate groups, preferably
at least 3 carboxylates. Polycarboxylate builder can generally be added to the composition
in acid form, but can also be added in the form of a neutralized salt. When utilized
in salt form, alkali metals, such as sodium, potassium, and lithium, or alkanolammonium
salts are preferred.
Included among the polycarboxylate builders are a variety of categories of useful
materials. One important category of polycarboxylate builders encompasses the ether
polycarboxylates, including oxydisuccinate, as disclosed in Berg, U.S. Patent 3,128,287,
issued April 7, 1964, and Lamberti et al, U.S. Patent 3,635,830, issued January 18,
1972. See also "TMS/TDS" builders of U.S. Patent 4,663,071, issued to Bush et al,
on May 5, 1987. Suitable ether polycarboxylates also include cyclic compounds, particularly
alicyclic compounds, such as those described in U.S. Patents 3,923,679; 3,835,163;
4,158,635; 4,120,874 and 4,102,903.
Other useful detergency builders include the ether hydroxypolycarboxylates, copolymers
of maleic anhydride with ethylene or vinyl methyl ether, 1, 3, 5-trihydroxy benzene-2,
4, 6-trisulphonic acid, and carboxymethyloxysuccinic acid, the various alkali metal,
ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of polyacetic acids such as ethylenediamine
tetraacetic acid and nitrilotriacetic acid, as well as polycarboxylates such as mellitic
acid, succinic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, polymaleic acid, benzene 1,3,5-tricarboxylic
acid, carboxymethyloxysuccinic acid, and soluble salts thereof. Citrate builders,
e.g., citric acid and soluble salts thereof (particularly sodium salt), are polycarboxylate
builders of particular importance for heavy duty liquid detergent formulations due
to their availability from renewable resources and their biodegradability. Citrates
can also be used in granular compositions, especially in combination with zeolite
and/or layered silicate builders. Oxydisuccinates are also especially useful in such
compositions and combinations.
Also suitable in the detergent compositions of the present invention are the 3,3-dicarboxy-4-oxa-1,6-hexanedioates
and the related compounds disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,566,984, Bush, issued January
28, 1986. Useful succinic acid builders include the C
5-C
20 alkyl and alkenyl succinic acids and salts thereof. A particularly preferred compound
of this type is dodecenylsuccinic acid. Specific examples of succinate builders include:
laurylsuccinate, myristylsuccinate, palmitylsuccinate, 2-dodecenylsuccinate (preferred),
2-pentadecenylsuccinate, and the like. Laurylsuccinates are the preferred builders
of this group, and are described in European Patent Application 86200690.5/0,200,263,
published November 5, 1986.
Other suitable polycarboxylates are disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,144,226, Crutchfield
et al, issued March 13, 1979 and in U.S. Patent 3,308,067, Diehl, issued March 7,
1967. See also Diehl U.S. Patent 3,723,322.
Fatty acids, e.g., C
12-C
18 monocarboxylic acids, can also be incorporated into the compositions alone, or in
combination with the aforesaid builders, especially citrate and/or the succinate builders,
to provide additional builder activity. Such use of fatty acids will generally result
in a diminution of sudsing, which should be taken into account by the formulator.
In situations where phosphorus-based builders can be used, and especially in the formulation
of bars used for hand-laundering operations, the various alkali metal phosphates such
as the well-known sodium tripolyphosphates, sodium pyrophosphate and sodium orthophosphate
can be used. Phosphonate builders such as ethane-1-hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonate and other
known phosphonates (see, for example, U.S. Patents 3,159,581; 3,213,030; 3,422,021;
3,400,148 and 3,422,137) can also be used.
Bleach
[0034] The detergent compositions herein may optionally contain bleaching agents or bleaching
compositions containing a bleaching agent and one or more bleach activators. When
present, bleaching agents will typically be at levels of from about 1% to about 30%,
more typically from about 5% to about 20%, of the detergent composition, especially
for fabric laundering. If present, the amount of bleach activators will typically
be from about 0.1% to about 60%, more typically from about 0.5% to about 40% of the
bleaching composition comprising the bleaching agent-plus-bleach activator.
The bleaching agents used herein can be any of the bleaching agents useful for detergent
compositions in textile cleaning, hard surface cleaning, or other cleaning purposes
that are now known or become known. These include oxygen bleaches as well as other
bleaching agents. Perborate bleaches, e.g., sodium perborate (e.g., mono- or tetra-hydrate)
can be used herein.
Another category of bleaching agent that can be used without restriction encompasses
percarboxylic acid bleaching agents and salts thereof. Suitable examples of this class
of agents include magnesium monoperoxyphthalate hexahydrate, the magnesium salt of
metachloro perbenzoic acid, 4-nonylamino-4-oxoperoxybutyric acid and diperoxydodecanedioic
acid. Such bleaching agents are disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,483,781, Hartman, issued
November 20, 1984, U.S. Patent Application 740,446, Burns et al, filed June 3, 1985,
European Patent Application 0,133,354, Banks et al, published February 20, 1985, and
U.S. Patent 4,412,934, Chung et al, issued November 1, 1983. Highly preferred bleaching
agents also include 6-nonylamino-6-oxoperoxycaproic acid as described in U.S. Patent
4,634,551, issued January 6, 1987 to Burns et al. Peroxygen bleaching agents can also
be used. Suitable peroxygen bleaching compounds include sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate
and equivalent "percarbonate" bleaches, sodium pyrophosphate peroxyhydrate, urea peroxyhydrate,
and sodium peroxide. Persulfate bleach (e.g., OXONE, manufactured commercially by
DuPont) can also be used.
A preferred percarbonate bleach comprises dry particles having an average particle
size in the range from about 500 micrometers to about 1,000 micrometers, not more
than about 10% by weight of said particles being smaller than about 200 micrometers
and not more than about 10% by weight of said particles being larger than about 1,250
micrometers. Optionally, the percarbonate can be coated with silicate, borate or water-soluble
surfactants. Percarbonate is available from various commercial sources such as FMC,
Solvay and Tokai Denka.
Mixtures of bleaching agents can also be used.
Peroxygen bleaching agents, the perborates, the percarbonates, etc., are preferably
combined with bleach activators, which lead to the
in situ production in aqueous solution (i.e., during the washing process) of the peroxy acid
corresponding to the bleach activator. Various nonlimiting examples of activators
are disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,915,854, issued April 10, 1990 to Mao et al, and U.S.
Patent 4,412,934. The nonanoyloxybenzene sulfonate (NOBS) and tetraacetyl ethylene
diamine (TAED) activators are typical, and mixtures thereof can also be used. See
also U.S. 4,634,551 for other typical bleaches and activators useful herein.
Highly preferred amido-derived bleach activators are those of the formulae:
R
1N(R
5)C(O)R
2C(O)L or R
1C(O)N(R
5)R
2C(O)L
wherein R1 is an alkyl group containing from about 6 to about 12 carbon atoms, R2 is an alkylene containing from 1 to about 6 carbon atoms, R5 is H or alkyl, aryl, or alkaryl containing from about 1 to about 10 carbon atoms,
and L is any suitable leaving group. A leaving group is any group that is displaced
from the bleach activator as a consequence of the nucleophilic attack on the bleach
activator by the perhydrolysis anion. A preferred leaving group is phenyl sulfonate.
Preferred examples of bleach activators of the above formulae include (6-octanamido-caproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate,
(6-nonanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate, (6-decanamidocaproyl)oxybenzenesulfonate,
and mixtures thereof as described in U.S. Patent 4,634,551, incorporated herein by
reference.
Another class of bleach activators comprises the benzoxazin-type activators disclosed
by Hodge et al in U.S. Patent 4,966,723, issued October 30, 1990, incorporated herein
by reference. A highly preferred activator of the benzoxazin-type is:

Still another class of preferred bleach activators includes the acyl lactam activators,
especially acyl caprolactams and acyl valerolactams of the formulae:
wherein R6 is H or an alkyl, aryl, alkoxyaryl, or alkaryl group containing from 1 to about 12
carbon atoms. Highly preferred lactam activators include benzoyl caprolactam, octanoyl
caprolactam, 3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl caprolactam, nonanoyl caprolactam, decanoyl caprolactam,
undecenoyl caprolactam, benzoyl valerolactam, octanoyl valerolactam, decanoyl valerolactam,
undecenoyl valerolactam, nonanoyl valerolactam, 3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl valerolactam
and mixtures thereof. See also U.S. Patent 4,545,784, issued to Sanderson, October
8, 1985, incorporated herein by reference, which discloses acyl caprolactams, including
benzoyl caprolactam, adsorbed into sodium perborate.
Bleaching agents other than oxygen bleaching agents are also known in the art and
can be utilized herein. One type of non-oxygen bleaching agent of particular interest
includes photoactivated bleaching agents such as the sulfonated zinc and/or aluminum
phthalocyanines. See U.S. Patent 4,033,718, issued July 5, 1977 to Holcombe et al.
If used, detergent compositions will typically contain from about 0.025% to about
1.25%, by weight, of such bleaches, especially sulfonate zinc phthalocyanine.
If desired, the bleaching compounds can be catalyzed by means of a manganese compound.
Such compounds are well known in the art and include, for example, the manganese-based
catalysts disclosed in U.S. Pat. 5,246,621, U.S. Pat. 5,244,594; U.S. Pat. 5,194,416;
U.S. Pat. 5,114,606; and European Pat. App. Pub. Nos. 549,271A1, 549,272A1, 544,440A2,
and 544,490A1; Preferred examples of these catalysts include Mn
IV2(u-O)
3(1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane)
2(PF
6)
2, Mn
III2(u-O)
1(u-OAc)
2(1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane)
2-(ClO
4)
2, Mn
IV4(u-O)
6(1,4,7-triazacyclononane)
4(ClO
4)
4, Mn
IIIMn
IV4(u-O)
1(u-OAc)
2-(1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane)
2(ClO
4)
3, Mn
IV-(1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane)- (OCH
3)
3(PF
6), and mixtures thereof. Other metal-based bleach catalysts include those disclosed
in U.S. Pat. 4,430,243 and U.S. Pat. 5,114,611. The use of manganese with various
complex ligands to enhance bleaching is also reported in the following United States
Patents: 4,728,455; 5,284,944; 5,246,612; 5,256,779; 5,280,117; 5,274,147; 5,153,161;
and 5,227,084.
As a practical matter, and not by way of limitation, the compositions and processes
herein can be adjusted to provide on the order of at least one part per ten million
of the active bleach catalyst species in the aqueous washing liquor, and will preferably
provide from about 0.1 ppm to about 700 ppm, more preferably from about 1 ppm to about
500 ppm, of the catalyst species in the laundry liquor.
Enzymes
[0035] Enzymes can be included in the formulations herein for a wide variety of fabric laundering
purposes, including removal of protein-based, carbohydrate-based, or triglyceride-based
stains, for example, and for the prevention of refugee dye transfer, and for fabric
restoration. The enzymes to be incorporated include proteases, amylases, lipases,
cellulases, and peroxidases, as well as mixtures thereof. Other types of enzymes may
also be included. They may be of any suitable origin, such as vegetable, animal, bacterial,
fungal and yeast origin. However, their choice is governed by several factors such
as pH-activity and/or stability optima, thermostability, stability versus active detergents,
builders and so on. In this respect bacterial or fungal enzymes are preferred, such
as bacterial amylases and proteases, and fungal cellulases.
Enzymes are normally incorporated at levels sufficient to provide up to about 5 mg
by weight, more typically about 0.01 mg to about 3 mg, of active enzyme per gram of
the composition. Stated otherwise, the compositions herein will typically comprise
from about 0.001% to about 5%, preferably 0.01%-1% by weight of a commercial enzyme
preparation. Protease enzymes are usually present in such commercial preparations
at levels sufficient to provide from 0.005 to 0.1 Anson units (AU) of activity per
gram of composition.
Suitable examples of proteases are the subtilisins which are obtained from particular
strains of B. subtilis and B. licheniforms. Another suitable protease is obtained
from a strain of Bacillus, having maximum activity throughout the pH range of 8-12,
developed and sold by Novo Industries A/S under the registered trade name ESPERASE.
The preparation of this enzyme and analogous enzymes is described in British Patent
Specification No. 1,243,784 of Novo. Proteolytic enzymes suitable for removing protein-based
stains that are commercially available include those sold under the tradenames ALCALASE
and SAVINASE by Novo Industries A/S (Denmark) and MAXATASE by International Bio-Synthetics,
Inc. (The Netherlands). Other proteases include Protease A (see European Patent Application
130,756, published January 9, 1985) and Protease B (see European Patent Application
Serial No. 87303761.8, filed April 28, 1987, and European Patent Application 130,756,
Bott et al, published January 9, 1985).
Amylases include, for example, α-amylases described in British Patent Specification
No. 1,296,839 (Novo), RAPIDASE, International Bio-Synthetics, Inc. and TERMAMYL, Novo
Industries.
[0036] The cellulase usable in the present invention include both bacterial or fungal cellulase.
Preferably, they will have a pH optimum of between 5 and 9.5. Suitable cellulases
are disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,435,307, Barbesgoard et al, issued March 6, 1984, which
discloses fungal cellulase produced from Humicola insolens and Humicola strain DSM1800
or a cellulase 212-producing fungus belonging to the genus Aeromonas, and cellulase
extracted from the hepatopancreas of a marine mollusk (Dolabella Auricula Solander).
suitable cellulases are also disclosed in GB-A-2.075.028; GB-A-2.095.275 and DE-OS-2.247.832.
CAREZYME (Novo) is especially useful.
Suitable lipase enzymes for detergent usage include those produced by microorganisms
of the Pseudomonas group, such as Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 19.154, as disclosed in
British Patent 1,372,034. See also lipases in Japanese Patent Application 53,20487,
laid open to public inspection on February 24, 1978. This lipase is available from
Amano Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nagoya, Japan, under the trade name Lipase P "Amano,"
hereinafter referred to as "Amano-P." Other commercial lipases include Amano-CES,
lipases ex Chromobacter viscosum, e.g. Chromobacter viscosum var. lipolyticum NRRLB
3673, commercially available from Toyo Jozo Co., Tagata, Japan; and further Chromobacter
viscosum lipases from U.S. Biochemical Corp., U.S.A. and Disoynth Co., The Netherlands,
and lipases ex Pseudomonas gladioli. The LIPOLASE enzyme derived from Humicola lanuginosa
and commercially available from Novo (see also EPO 341,947) is a preferred lipase
for use herein.
Peroxidase enzymes are used in combination with oxygen sources, e.g., percarbonate,
perborate, persulfate, hydrogen peroxide, etc. They are used for "solution bleaching,"
i.e. to prevent transfer of dyes or pigments removed from substrates during wash operations
to other substrates in the wash solution. Peroxidase enzymes are known in the art,
and include, for example, horseradish peroxidase, ligninase, and haloperoxidase such
as chloro- and bromo-peroxidase. Peroxidase-containing detergent compositions are
disclosed, for example, in PCT International Application WO 89/099813, published October
19, 1989, by O. Kirk, assigned to Novo Industries A/S.
A wide range of enzyme materials and means for their incorporation into synthetic
detergent compositions are also disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,553,139, issued January
5, 1971 to McCarty et al. Enzymes are further disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,101,457,
Place et al, issued July 18, 1978, and in U.S. Patent 4,507,219, Hughes, issued March
26, 1985, both. Enzyme materials useful for liquid detergent formulations, and their
incorporation into such formulations, are disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,261,868, Hora
et al, issued April 14, 1981. Enzymes for use in detergents can be stabilized by various
techniques. Enzyme stabilization techniques are disclosed and exemplified in U.S.
Patent 3,600,319, issued August 17, 1971 to Gedge, et al, and European Patent Application
Publication No. 0 199 405, Application No. 86200586.5, published October 29, 1986,
Venegas. Enzyme stabilization systems are also described, for example, in U.S. Patent
3,519,570.
[0037] Other components which are comonly used in detergent compositions and which may be
incorpoated into the detergent tablets of the present invention include chelating
agents, soil release agents, soil antiredeposition agents, dispersing agents, brighteners,
suds suppressors, fabric softeners, dye transfer inhibition agents and perfumes.
EXAMPLES
[0038]
| |
Ex. 1 |
Ex. 2 |
Comp. Ex. 3 |
Comp. Ex. 4 |
| Anionic Agglomerates |
24.48 |
19.59 |
25.00 |
20.00 |
| Nonionic Agglomerate |
5.40 |
4.32 |
5.53 |
4.42 |
| Bleach Activator Agglomerates |
5.56 |
4.45 |
5.69 |
4.55 |
| Zinc Phthalocyanine sulphonate encapsulate |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
| Suds Suppressor |
3.15 |
2.52 |
3.23 |
2.58 |
| Dried Zeolite |
6.16 |
4.93 |
6.30 |
5.04 |
| Layered Silicate |
13.38 |
10.70 |
13.69 |
10.95 |
| Dye transfer Inhibitor Agglomerate |
0.12 |
0.09 |
0.13 |
0.10 |
| Perfume Encapsulates |
0.22 |
0.18 |
0.23 |
0.18 |
| Nonionic Paste Spray-on |
5.30 |
4.24 |
5.43 |
4.34 |
| Fluorescer |
0.25 |
0.20 |
0.26 |
0.21 |
| Sodium carbonate |
4.57 |
3.66 |
4.68 |
3.74 |
| Sodium percarbonate |
19.38 |
15.50 |
19.78 |
15.86 |
| Sodium HEDP |
0.77 |
0.62 |
0.79 |
0.63 |
| Soil Release polymer |
0.17 |
0.14 |
0.18 |
0.14 |
| Perfume |
0.32 |
0.25 |
0.33 |
0.26 |
| Protease |
0.85 |
0.68 |
0.86 |
0.69 |
| Cellulase |
0.24 |
0.19 |
0.25 |
0.20 |
| Lipase |
0.21 |
0.16 |
0.21 |
0.17 |
| Amylase |
0.68 |
0.55 |
0.70 |
0.56 |
| Adipic Acid |
7.88 |
7.88 |
6.70 |
6.70 |
| Effervescency Compact |
- |
18.25 |
- |
18.66 |
| Disintegrant NYMCEL ZSB-16 |
0.88 |
0.88 |
- |
- |
| TOTAL |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
Anionic agglomerates comprise 38% anionic surfactant, 22% zeolite and 40% carbonate.
Nonionic agglomerates comprise 26% nonionic surfactant, 48% zeolite and 26% carbonate.
Bleach activator agglomerates comprise 81% TAED, 17% acrylic/maleic copolymer (acid
form) and 2% water.
Zinc Phthalocyanine sulphonate encapsulates are 10% active.
Suds suppressor comprises 11.5% silicone oil (ex Dow Corning), and 88.5% starch.
Layered silicate comprises 78% SKS-6, ex Hoechst, 22% citric acid.
Dye transfer inhibitor agglomerates comprise 21% PVNO/PVPVI, 61% zeolite and 18% carbonate.
Perfume encapsulates comprise 50% perfume and 50% starch.
Nonionic paste spray-on comprises 67% C12-C15 AE5 (alcohol with an average of 5 ethoxy
groups per molecule), 24% N-methyl glucose amide and 9% water.
Effervescent compact comprises 54.5% sodium bicarbonate and 45.5% citric acid. |
[0039] All the particulate materials of Example 1, except for the dried zeolite, were mixed
together in a mixing drum to form a homogeneous particulate mixture, during this mixing
the spray-ons were carried out. After the spray-ons the dusting was carried out with
the dried zeolite.
A first series of tablets were made the following way, about 37.5 g. of the mixture
was introduced into a mould of circular shape with a diameter of 4.5 cm, and compressed
with a force of 0.5 kN. or about 30 Newton/cm2, to give tablets of about 2.2 cm height and a density of about 1.1 g./cc. The tensile
strength of the tablet was 3.5 kPa.
Adipic acid was heated in a thermostatic bath till 170°C with gentle stirring until
molten. The disintegrant, Nymcel ZSB-16®, was then added with continuous stirring
to the adipic acid to form a suspension. The tablets prepared as above were then dipped
into the liquid to give the final coated tablet, this tablet had a total weight of
41.1 g, and a tensile strength of 12.6 kPa.
An second series of tablets was made with a compaction force of 1kN. or about 65 N/cm2 to give tablets of about 2.0 cm height, a density of about 1.2 g./cc, and a tensile
strength of 9.0 kPa.
After coating with Adipic Acid the tablets had a weight of 41.2 g, and the tensile
strength was 21.2 kPa.
A third series of tablets was made with a compaction force of 1.5 kN. or about 95N/cm2 to give tablets of about 1.9 cm height, a density of about 1.3 g./cc, and a tensile
strength of 12.9 kPa. After coating with Adipic Acid the tablets had a weight of 41.1
g, and the tensile strength was 31.5 kPa.
Example 2
[0040] Mixing according to the method described in Example 1, after the dusting the effervescency
granules were added to the mix drum, and a final mix was made.
Tabletting and coating was carried out according to the method described in Example
1
A first series of tablets was made with a Compaction Force of 1 kN. or about 63 Newton/cm2, to give tablets of about 2.2 cm height, a density of about 1.1 gr./cc, and a tensile
strength of 4.5 kPa.
After coating with Adipic acid the tablets had a weight of 41.1 g, and the tensile
strength was 14.4 kPa.
A second series of tablets was made with a compaction force of 1.5 kN. or about 95
N/cm2 to give tablets of about 2.2 cm height, a density of about 1.2 gr./cc, and a tensile
strength of 8.5 kPa.
After coating with Adipic Acid the tablets had a weight of 41.1 g, and a tensile strength
was 22.2 kPa.
An third series of tablets was made with a compaction force of 2.5 kN. or about 160
N/cm2 to give tablets of about 2.0 cm height, a density of about 1.2 g./cc, and a tensile
strength of 15.7 kPa.
After coating with Adipic Acid the tablets had a weight of 41.1 g, and the tensile
strength increased to 31 kPa.
[0041] In Comparative Example 3, the process of example 1 was repeated but without the disintegrant.
The final tensile strength of the three series of tablets was 6.5 kPa, 15.5 kPa and
19.5 kPa respectively.
[0042] In Comparative Example 4, the process of example 4 was repeated but without the disintegrant.
The final tensile strength of the three series of tablets was 10.4 kPa, 14.5 kPa and
21.3 kPa respectively.