[0001] This invention relates to a safe for storage of valuables.
[0002] It is known to provide a safe in the form of a heavy lockable enclosure, often of
steel, and often with one or more sensors to detect an attack on the safe, by sensing
heat, sound, vibration or movement; the physical resistance of the safe is the source
of such signals which are detected by respective different sensors.
[0003] A disadvantage of such safes is that positions of the sensors become known to criminals,
so that they can be disarmed, e.g. by cutting or tampering with wiring, selecting
a preferred attack method depending on the known type of sensor, or otherwise disabling
the alarms.
[0004] It is an object of the invention to provide a safe having an alarm system which is
less easily bypassed than existing alarm systems.
[0005] According to the invention there is provided a security enclosure comprising a hollow
body; electrical signal sensing means contained within the hollow body; and response
means to respond to an attack on the enclosure, characterized in that the hollow body
comprises a material which provides an electrical signal in response to an attack.
[0006] Said material may be a layer of a piezoelectric material which will provide electrical
signals in response to mechanical attacks, or a layer of a pyroelectric material which
will provide electrical signals in response to thermal attacks, or a combination.
Advantageously, the material is a layer of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) which responds
to both mechanical and thermal attacks.
[0007] Preferably there is also provided discrimination means to determine the type of attack
on the safe, and in response to some types of attack to select at least one of a plurality
of response means. The discrimination means may for example be a neural network.
[0008] It is an advantage of a safe according to the invention that it is impossible to
disable the response to an attack on the safe without opening the safe.
[0009] The invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the
accompanying drawings in which:-
Figure 1 is a view of a safe according to the invention incorporated in an automated
teller machine (ATM); and
Figure 2 illustrates the operation of the safe.
[0010] In Figure 1 an ATM 10 has a card insertion slot 12, a keypad 14, a display screen
16, and a cash delivery slot 18. Within the ATM is a safe 20 enclosing the currency-containing
parts (not shown) of the ATM such as currency cassettes. Within the safe is a computer
22, connected to electrical signal sensing circuitry 24.
[0011] The walls of the safe 20 are constructed of a composite which includes a layer of
PVDF; the PVDF may be sandwiched between inner and outer layers or may itself form
the inner wall of the safe. The other layer or layers of the composite may be metal
or plastics material or both. If the safe is attacked physically, e.g. by hammer blows
or with a thermal tool, the wall under attack generates an electric current which
is sensed by the circuitry 24; an attack on the casing of the ATM 10 generates a smaller
current. The circuitry 24 provides an indication of the current level to the computer
22.
[0012] The computer 22 incorporates a neural network which is trained to recognise different
types of attack on the safe 20. For example, if someone kicks the ATM 10, one type
of electrical signal will be generated by the safe 20, while if it is hit with a hammer,
a different type of signal arises. The neural network can then act appropriately,
such as a) giving no response to a kick; b) silently alerting the police or a security
centre in response to a single hammer blow; and c) initiating an audible alarm, and
a dye spray to mark the stored currency, in response to several hammer blows. Such
an intelligent response is more effective than a simple threshold detection and response
system, and will provide fewer false alarms. Thus, for example, the police will only
be warned of any genuine attacks, and currency will only be disabled by dye-marking
when the ATM is under serious threat.
[0013] Figure 2 shows the electrical sensing system 24 connected to a neural network 22,
which controls a silent alarm 26, which provides a radio signal to a security centre,
an audible alarm 28, such as a bell or siren, and a dye spray 30.
[0014] As an alternative to the use of a layer of PVDF alone as the sensor, there may also
be provided an additional layer of a pyroelectric material which will provide a further
signal in response to a thermal attach, additional to the pyroelectric response of
the PVDF layer.
[0015] A safe according to the invention can be used in any circumstances when secure storage
of valuables is required.
[0016] The use of a polymeric material even as part of a composite construction provides
a safe which is less physically resistant to attack than a steel safe; however many
grades of steel safe are required to resist attack for a relatively short period,
e.g. 30 minutes. The fact that a safe according to the invention constitutes an alarm
system which cannot be by-passed has the advantage of ensuring that an alarm signal
is always provided, giving an early indication of a serious attack.
1. A security enclosure comprising a hollow body (20); electrical signal sensing means
(22,24) contained within the hollow body; and response means (26,28,30) to respond
to an attack on the enclosure, characterized in that the hollow body (20) comprises
a material which provides an electrical signal in response to an attack.
2. A security enclosure according to claim 1, characterized in that said body (20) comprises
a layer of a piezoelectric material.
3. A security enclosure according to claim 1, characterized in that said body (20) comprises
a layer of pyroelectric material.
4. A security enclosure according to claim 1, characterized in that said body (20) comprises
a layer of polyvinylidene fluoride.
5. A security enclosure according to any preceding claim, characterized by comprising
a plurality of different response means (26,28,30).
6. A security enclosure according to claim 5, characterized in that the response means
include a silent alarm (26), an audible alarm (28) and banknote disable means (30).
7. A security enclosure according to claim 6, characterized in that the electrical signal
sensing means (22,24) is arranged to distinguish between different types of attack
on the enclosure, and to activate a selected one or more response means (26,28,30)
in accordance with the type of attack.
8. A security enclosure according to claim 7, characterized by comprising a computer
(22) connected between the electrical sensing means (24) and the response means (26,28,30).
9. A security enclosure according to claim 8, characterized in that the computer comprises
a neural network (22).