[0001] The present invention relates to a magnetic matrix display device and more particularly
to a magnet for use in such a display. Yet more particularly, the present invention
linearises the magnetic field around the edge of the magnet.
[0002] A magnetic matrix display of the present invention is particularly although not exclusively
useful in flat panel display applications such as television receivers and visual
display units for computers, especially although not exclusively portable computers,
personal organisers, communications equipment, and the like.
[0003] Conventional flat panel displays, such as liquid crystal display panels and field
emission displays, are complicated to manufacture because they each involve a relatively
high level of semiconductor fabrication, delicate materials, and high tolerances.
[0004] UK Patent Application 2304981 discloses a magnetic matrix display having a cathode
for emitting electrons, a permanent magnet with a two dimensional array of channels
extending between opposite poles of the magnet, the direction of magnetisation being
from the surface facing the cathode to the opposing surface. The magnet generates,
in each channel, a magnetic field for forming electrons from the cathode means into
an electron beam. The display also has a screen for receiving an electron beam from
each channel, the screen having a phosphor coating facing the side of the magnet remote
from the cathode, the phosphor coating comprising a plurality of pixels each corresponding
to a different channel. There are grid electrode means disposed between the cathode
means and the magnet for controlling flow of electrons from the cathode means into
each channel. The two dimensional array of channels are regularly spaced on an X-Y
grid. The magnet area is large compared with its thickness.
[0005] The permanent magnet is used to form substantially linear, high intensity fields
in the channels or magnetic apertures for the purpose of collimating the electrons
passing through the aperture. The diameter of the beam so formed is largely dependent
on the flux density present in the apertures of the magnet. Changes in the aperture
flux density across the magnet body will result in changes in the electron beam diameter
in different areas of the display for identical electrical conditions. This will in
turn interfere with the electron lensing such that the beam diameter when it strikes
the phosphors under the final anode will be variable across the display surface. The
visible manifestations will be changes in luminance uniformity, or in severe cases,
a purity error.
[0006] In accordance with the present invention, there is now provided a display device
comprising: cathode means for emitting electrons; a permanent magnet; a two dimensional
array of channels extending between opposite poles of the magnet; the magnet generating,
in each channel, a magnetic field for forming electrons from the cathode means into
an electron beam; a screen for receiving an electron beam from each channel, the screen
having a phosphor coating facing the side of the magnet remote from the cathode, the
phosphor coating comprising a plurality of pixels each corresponding to a different
channel; grid electrode means disposed between the cathode means and the magnet for
controlling flow of electrons from the cathode means into each channel; deflection
means for sequentially addressing the electron beam from each channel to each pixel
of a corresponding group; and wherein the magnet extends in at least a first dimension
beyond the area occupied by said two dimensional array of channels such that the field
strength in the channels at the periphery of the array is substantially equal to the
field strength in channels at the centre of the array.
[0007] By extending the magnet beyond the area occupied by the two dimensional array of
channels, the field strength in the channels at the periphery is maintained to a value
substantially similar to the field strength in channels near to the centre of the
two dimensional array of channels. The extended area reduces the tendency of the flux
lines to take the 'easy' route of closure round the edge of the magnet in preference
to closure through the apertures or channels. By making closure round the edge of
the magnet more difficult, more of the flux lines close through the apertures and
a flux density which is more uniform between apertures is provided.
[0008] Preferably, the magnet extends in a second dimension such that the two dimensional
array of channels has a surrounding periphery of magnetic material. In a preferred
embodiment, the size of the extended magnet is such that the channels at the periphery
of the array of channels have substantially the same field strength within them as
channels at the centre of the array of channels.
[0009] The invention will advantageously provide an improved uniformity of flux density
when the magnet is extended in a single dimension only, but by providing a continuous
surrounding periphery of extended magnet, a more uniform flux density is achieved
for all of the array of channels. The size of the extended magnet is optimised through
finite element (FE) modelling or through experiment until substantially the same field
strength is obtained in channels at the periphery of the array of channels as in channels
at the centre of the array of channels.
[0010] In a preferred embodiment, the channels are cylindrical in shape, and are between
75µm and 225µm in diameter, are spaced between 100µm and 450µm apart and the magnet
is 0.5mm to 2mm in thickness.
[0011] More preferably, the extended magnet area has circuits for control of the display
device located thereon. In a first embodiment of such a display device, the extended
magnet area includes a portion of the array of channels, said portion of the array
of channels having a grid electrode means disposed between the cathode means and the
magnet for preventing the admission of electrons from the cathode to the portion of
the array of channels. In a second embodiment of the display device, the extended
magnet area includes a portion of the array of channels, said portion of the array
of channels being physically blocked with non-magnetic material so as to prevent the
admission of electrons from the cathode to the portion of the array of channels.
[0012] Electrical connections to the grids which are part of the display device may be easily
made to circuits mounted on the extended magnet area. Additionally, driver circuits
may be so arranged that the number of connections to the display which are required
is reduced, resulting in a corresponding reduction in the number of connections which
pass through the vacuum envelope of the magnetic matrix display.
[0013] The present invention extends to a computer system comprising: memory means; data
transfer means for transferring data to and from the memory means; processor means
for processing data stored in the memory means; and a display device as hereinbefore
described for displaying data processed by the processor means.
[0014] Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example
only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a simplified cross-sectional view of an example of a Magnetic Matrix Display
device;
Figure 2 is a cutaway plan view of the example of figure 1;
Figure 3 is a view of a small magnet having 16 apertures;
Figure 4 is a graph of the magnetic flux density (Bz) along the Z axis of the magnet
of figure 3;
Figure 5 is a section through the magnet of figure 3 showing the z-directed magnetic
field;
Figure 6 is a view of a single aperture and associated magnetic material;
Figure 7 is a graph of the magnetic flux density (BZ) along the Z axis of the magnet
of figure 6;
Figure 8 is a section through the magnet of figure 6 showing the Z-directed magnetic
field;
Figure 9 is a view of a line of 64 apertures extracted from an infinite strip of apertures;
Figure 10 is a graph showing the Z-directed magnetic field for the 1st, 40th and 60th
apertures of the magnet of figure 9;
Figure 11 is a graph showing the Z-directed magnetic field for the 58th, 60th, 62nd
and 64th apertures of the magnet of figure 9;
Figure 12 is a view of the first 16 apertures of the magnet of figure 9, showing the
Z-directed flux density;
Figure 13 is a view of the second 16 apertures of the magnet of figure 9, showing
the Z-directed flux density;
Figure 14 is a view of the third 16 apertures of the magnet of figure 9, showing the
Z-directed flux density;
Figure 15 is a view of the fourth 16 apertures of the magnet of figure 9, showing
the Z-directed flux density;
Figure 16 is a section view of the magnet of figure 9 showing the field in front of
the magnet;
Figure 17 is a view of a line of 64 apertures extracted from an infinite strip of
apertures, having a keeper ring according to the present invention;
Figure 18 is a graph showing the Z-directed magnetic field for the 1st, 40th and 60th
apertures of the magnet of figure 17;
Figure 19 is a graph showing the Z-directed magnetic field for the 58th, 60th, 62nd
and 64th apertures of the magnet of figure 17;
Figure 20 is a view of the first 16 apertures of the magnet of figure 17, showing
the Z-directed flux density;
Figure 21 is a view of the second 16 apertures of the magnet of figure 17, showing
the Z-directed flux density;
Figure 22 is a view of the third 16 apertures of the magnet of figure 17, showing
the Z-directed flux density;
Figure 23 is a view of the fourth 16 apertures of the magnet of figure 17, showing
the Z-directed flux density;
Figure 24 is a view showing the keeper ring supporting the flux density near the edge
of the magnet of figure 17;
Figure 25 is a section view of the magnet of figure 17 showing the field in front
of the magnet;
Figure 26A shows a finite magnet similar to that of figure 3;
Figure 26B shows the magnet of figure 9, used to model an infinite magnet; and
Figure 26C shows a semi-infinite magnet similar to that of figure 17.
[0015] Referring to Figure 1, an example of a magnetic matrix display device 10 comprises
a plane cathode 20 facing a plane anode 30. A phosphor coating 150 is disposed on
the side of the anode 30 remote from the cathode. A permanent magnet 140 is disposed
between the anode 30 and the cathode 20. The magnet 140 is perforated by a two dimensional
matrix of channels or "wells" 160. A grid assembly is disposed between the magnet
140 and the cathode 20. The grid assembly comprises first and second electrically
isolated arrays of parallel conductors hereinafter referred to as first grids 71 and
second grids 72 respectively. The first grids 71 are arranged orthogonally to the
second grids 72 to form a lattice pattern. Apertures are formed in the first grids
71 and the second grids 72. The apertures are located at each intersection of a first
grid 71 and a second grid 72. Each aperture is aligned with a different well 160.
[0016] Referring to Figure 2, column drive circuitry 170 is connected to the second grids
72. Row drive circuitry 180 is connected to the first grids 71. This has the advantage
that for a conventional display having a four to three aspect ratio, with more columns
than rows, the number of more complex expensive analog drivers is reduced at the cost
of having more simple, cheap digital switches. In operation, the anode 30 is held
at a higher potential than the cathode 20. Electrons emitted from the cathode 20 are
thus accelerated towards the anode 30. As electrons enter each of the wells 160 in
the magnet 140 they are collimated into a dense beam by the magnetic field therein.
In operation, admittance of electrons to the wells is selectively controlled via the
grid assembly. Each well 160 is addressable by appropriate voltage signals applied
by the row drive circuitry 180 and the column drive circuitry 170 to the corresponding
first grid 71 and second grid 72. Electrons are thus selectively admitted or blocked
from entering each well 160, passing through the magnet 140 and reaching the corresponding
region of the phosphor coating 150 to generate a pixel of a displayed image on the
screen. The pixels of the displayed image are scanned in a refresh pattern. To produce
the refresh pattern, a column of pixels is energised by applying an appropriate voltage,
via the column drive circuitry 170 to the corresponding second grid 72 with the voltage
on the first grids 71 set via the row drive circuitry 180 so that no beam current
flows. The voltages on the remaining second grids 72 are set by the column drive circuitry
170 so that no beam current flows for any operating voltage on the first grids 71.
The voltages on the first grids 71 are then modulated by row drive circuitry 180 as
a function of input video data corresponding to the energised column of pixels. The
process is then repeated for the next successive column. The row and column functions
may be transposed relative to that conventionally used in LCDs, that is the rows are
driven by an analog voltage and the columns are switched between two analog levels.
[0017] Before considering methods of equalising the aperture flux density across the active
display area, it is first necessary to understand more fully the factors which influence
this flux density. This is explored using a 3D finite element analysis software package
to solve the equations for the fields in the magnet and in the space in which it resides.
Small finite magnet
[0018] Figure 3 shows a small magnet 300 with 16 apertures 301-304 totally enclosed in a
volume of air. The apertures 301-304 are arranged in a square grid at 300µm centres.
Each aperture 301-304 is 200µm in diameter. The magnet 300 is 2mm thick. The boundaries
of the volume of air used in this finite element (FE) model of a magnet are a long
way from the magnet 300 to ensure that errors in the field calculation near the magnet
300 are minimised. In the FE model, the boundary conditions for the volume of air
are set such that no flux 'leaks' from the volume of air. The values chosen for the
thickness of the magnet and the aperture diameter are typical values and the present
invention is not limited to applicability to magnets having only these dimensions.
[0019] Figure 4 shows a graph of the Z-directed component of the magnetic flux density (BZ)
in Gauss (G) versus the position along the Z axis in mm. 1 Gauss is equivalent to
10
-4 Tesla (T), so the Y axis scale is equivalent to +0.04T to -0.12T. The 2 mm thick
magnet of figure 3 is located along the horizontal axis of the graph in the area labelled
as 400. The vertical dash lines at each end of the area labelled 400 represent the
boundary between the magnet and the volume of air surrounding the magnet. The graph
has three lines showing the variation of BZ through three different apertures of the
magnet. Line 401 shows the variation of Bz through aperture 301, lines 402 and 404
show the variation of BZ through apertures 302 and 304 respectively. By symmetry,
the variation of BZ through aperture 303 is identical to that through aperture 302.
[0020] From figure 4 it can be seen that:
(i) the flux density in each of the apertures is markedly different;
(ii) each of the apertures has a flux density minimum in the centre of the aperture;
and
(iii) outside of each of the apertures there is a substantial variation in the field.
[0021] Figure 5 shows a section through the magnet of figure 1 with a plot of the Z-directed
magnetic field added. This plot shows in areas a to d the variations in flux density
throughout the magnet volume. The plot of figure 5 obtained by solving the equations
associated with a FE model is accurate in terms of representing the model of the magnet
in a volume of air, but does not accurately represent the physical situation that
is experienced in a display using such a magnet. The reason is that the magnet used
in such a display is in fact much larger than the magnet which is modelled and the
flux lines will actually have to travel much further to close around the edge of the
magnet at the magnet/air interface, that is they will require greater energy.
Infinite magnet
[0022] To accurately model a full sized magnet requires constructing an FE model for every
aperture in the magnet used in the display. The number of elements required to maintain
solution accuracy will be many hundreds of millions. This level of calculation complexity
makes solution by today's computers impossible and other means must be found in order
to proceed.
[0023] Consider now a magnet of infinite extent in the X and Y dimensions, but having the
same finite thickness (2 mm) in the Z direction. The magnet has air in the apertures
and in the area along the Z dimension where the magnet is not present. By symmetry,
it can be argued that for the magnetic material associated with each identical aperture,
the magnetic field straying to adjacent associated magnetic material is exactly countered
by an equal field entering the associated magnetic material of interest. Further,
since flux lines cannot cross, it can be argued that each associated area is entirely
self contained in terms of the magnetic fields. Thus, when investigating an infinite
magnet, it is sufficient to model only a single aperture and its associated magnetic
material to provide a complete solution for the whole infinite sheet.
[0024] Figure 6 shows such an aperture and its associated magnetic material. In the FE model
of figure 6, following the reasoning given above, the boundary conditions are set
such that the outside faces are defined to not permit any flux leakage. Further, the
midplane of the magnet (the plane containing the X and Y axes) is defined to have
boundary conditions such that flux lines only pass through the boundary at right angles,
that is the field is solely a Z directed field.
[0025] Figure 7 shows a graph of the Z directed component of the magnetic field from the
model of figure 6. This graph corresponds to that of figure 4 for the model of figure
3. From figure 7 it can be seen that: (i) the flux density through the aperture is
essentially linear; and (ii) there is a very low flux density outside the immediate
volume of magnetic material.
[0026] Additionally, since only a single aperture has been modelled to represent apertures
in a magnet of infinite extent, the flux density in each of the apertures is identical.
This and (i) and (ii) above are in contrast to the graphs of figure 4.
[0027] Figure 8 shows a section through the magnet of figure 6 with a plot of the Z-directed
magnetic field added. Note now that the flux density in the aperture is essentially
unchanged over its length. Also note that the flux density in the material is substantially
lower (1442 Gauss (0.1442T) maximum rather than 3159 Gauss (0.3159T) maximum) than
in the small magnet of figure 3.
[0028] These differences are explained by considering the behaviour of the flux lines themselves.
Firstly, air has a relative permeability of 1, that is, air is a medium highly resistant
to the passage of magnetic flux. Thus, from an energy consideration, a flux line will
take the shortest possible route for closure. In the case of a finite magnet, this
is both through the aperture and around the side of the magnet, with the relative
fields balancing in an energy equilibrium. Flux lines hardly return through the magnetic
material at all. To do so would first entail overcoming the inherent energy of the
magnet and so this is not a preferred route.
Demagnetisation
[0029] With the infinite magnet of figure 6, for a flux line to close around the edge of
the magnet it would require infinite energy. This is plainly impossible and so the
fields from the magnet must balance in the volume occupied. This results in a strong
flux density in the aperture. However, there are still 'surplus' flux lines and these
have no choice but to return through the magnetic material itself, demagnetising the
magnetic material in the process. The balance between the aperture flux density and
material demagnetisation is determined by the energy of the magnet in the first instance.
This is also influenced by the ratio of the aperture area to material area. Smaller
apertures in a given volume will lead to a higher aperture flux densities, from energy
balance considerations. Note that at no time can the aperture flux density ever exceed
that of the magnetic material producing it. For example, with a vanishingly small
aperture in a magnet of field strength, say 3000 Gauss (0.3T), the aperture flux density
could never be greater than 3000 Gauss (0.3T).
Semi-infinite magnet
[0030] We now have the situation where we have considered the small magnet of figure 3 in
a volume of air, and the infinite magnet of figure 6 with air above, below and within.
whilst these two models bound all possible models, they do not provide any insight
to the behaviour of a real, finite, but large, magnet. of particular interest are
the edge effects and the way in which the field varies across the magnet.
[0031] Consider a magnet of infinite extent in Y but of finite extent in X, that is, a magnet
of infinite length, but of finite width. By symmetry considerations, it may be argued
that a single horizontal line of pixels may be extracted from an infinite strip and
by setting the appropriate boundary conditions on the computer simulation, an accurate
assessment of fields made. Further, since the number of elements required to undertake
this modelling is manageable, the magnet/air interface may be included in the model
such that the edge effects on aperture flux density may be examined. Increases in
the total number of pixels that may be modelled are to be found by using all planes
of symmetry. These planes are:
1. Modelling only half of the horizontal strip, from the centre of the strip to the
magnet/air interface. This is a plane in the YZ dimensions.
2. Modelling only half the depth of the strip. The field above the magnet will be
equal in magnitude, but opposite in direction to that below the magnet. This is a
plane in the XY dimensions.
3. Modelling only half the width of the aperture. Cut the aperture and magnet in two
across the diameter of the apertures. This is a plane in the XZ dimensions.
[0032] These measures provide an eight-fold reduction in the number of elements required,
or conversely, provide an eight-fold increase in the number of pixels that can be
modelled as part of the strip. For example, if without symmetry a line of 64 pixels
can be modelled, then with the addition of symmetry planes, 512 pixels can be modelled.
An important point to note is that this represents half the width of a 1024 x 768
pixel display.
[0033] Figure 9 shows a magnet 900 having a line of 64 apertures extracted from an infinitely
long strip of apertures. In figure 9 only two planes of symmetry have been used. A
plane 930 in YZ has been used, so that only half of the strip from the centre at 920
to the magnet/air interface at 910 has been modelled. By symmetry plane 930, the line
of 64 apertures is really modelling a line of 128 apertures. A plane 940 in XY has
also been used, so that only half the depth of the strip has been modelled. The apertures
are numbered from 1 at the end 920 nearest the plane of symmetry to 64 at the end
nearest the magnet/air interface 910.
[0034] Figure 10 shows three graphs 901, 940, 960 of the Z directed field in Gauss for the
1st, 40th and 60th apertures respectively of the magnet of figure 9 versus the position
along the Z axis in mm. The magnet 900 of figure 9 is located along the horizontal
axis of the graph in the area labelled as 900. The vertical dash lines at each end
of the area labelled 900 represent the boundary between the magnet and the volume
of air surrounding the magnet 900 at the upper and lower faces. The apertures have
their longitudinal axis along the horizontal axis of the graph. As can be seen, the
field at the first aperture is fairly close to that seen in the infinite magnet model
of figure 6. However, as the edge of the magnet is approached, so the field tends
to change towards that of the small but finite magnet of figure 3. The change in the
graphs of the Z directed field for the 1st and 40th aperture (901 and 940) is small,
indicating that any changes across the display area tend to be near the magnet edges.
[0035] Figure 11 shows four graphs 958, 960, 962, 964 of the Z directed field for the 58th,
60th, 62nd and 64th apertures respectively of the magnet of figure 9. These graphs
show the changes in aperture flux near the magnet edge in greater detail. As can be
seen, the flux density reduction increases rapidly near the edge of the magnet 900.
A magnet having the Z directed fields shown in the graphs would result in a severe
beam disturbance when used in a magnetic matrix display. This would lead to the unwanted
effects described earlier.
[0036] Figure 12 shows the Z directed flux density just above the surface of the magnet
of figure 9. In figure 12 the apertures numbered 1 to 16 are shown. As can be seen
the Z directed flux density does not vary to any great extent between aperture 1 and
aperture 16. The flux density above the apertures has a peak value of -1163G (-0.1163T)
and above the magnetic material has a peak value of 408G (0.0408T).
[0037] Figure 13 shows the Z directed flux density just above the surface of the magnet
of figure 9. In figure 13 the apertures numbered 17 to 32 are shown. As can be seen
the Z directed flux density does not vary to any great extent between aperture 17
and aperture 32, although a gradual decrease in the peak value of the flux density
above the apertures to - 1156G (-0.1156T) can be seen accompanied by an increase in
the peak value of the flux density above the magnetic material itself to 437G (0.0437T).
[0038] Figure 14 shows the Z directed flux density just above the surface of the magnet
of figure 7. In figure 14 the apertures numbered 33 to 48 are shown. As can be seen
the Z directed flux density does not vary to any great extent between aperture 33
and aperture 48, although a further decrease in the flux density above the apertures
to a peak value of - 1131G (-0.1131T) can be seen accompanied by a significant increase
above the flux density in the magnetic material itself to a peak value of 526G (0.0526T).
[0039] Figure 15 shows the Z directed flux density just above the surface of the magnet
of figure 9. In figure 15 the apertures numbered 49 to 64 are shown. As can be seen
the Z directed flux density does vary to a considerable extent between aperture 49
and aperture 64. A yet further decrease in the flux density above the apertures to
a peak value of - 1052G (-0.1052T) can be seen accompanied by almost double the flux
density above the magnetic material itself at a peak value of 1040G (0.104T).
[0040] Figure 16 shows the modulus of the field intensity in front of the magnet 900. The
magnet 900 is shown in cross section with aperture 1 at the left hand edge and aperture
64 at the right hand edge. The contour shading clearly shows the field non-linearity.
[0041] This part of the description has shown how it is possible, by using the boundary
conditions and by problem symmetry, to investigate the behaviour of a large area magnet
by consideration of small sections of the magnet. The fields of the magnets of figures
3, 6 and 9 have been described. The way in which the field varies as the edge of the
magnet is approached can be quantified and the present invention now to be described
provides a means by which this variation can be reduced.
Semi-infinite magnet with keeper ring.
[0042] The edge effects in a large area magnet such as that of figure 9 are due to the closure
of flux lines taking the easiest route. By making closure of the flux lines around
the edge of the magnet more difficult, this preferential route will be avoided, causing
more of the flux lines to close through the apertures and providing a flux density
which is more uniform between apertures.
[0043] Figure 17 shows a magnet 1700 according to the present invention. The magnet 1700
is similar to the magnet 900 of figure 9, but with the addition of a 'keeper' ring
1710 between the last aperture (aperture 64) and the edge of the magnet 1720. The
purpose of the keeper ring is to produce a region of strong field which will tend
to dominate at the edge of the magnet, so making it more difficult for lines of magnetic
flux associated with the pixels to close around the edge of the magnet. In other words,
its function is to linearise the field in the active region of the display.
[0044] Figure 18 shows three graphs 1701, 1740, 1760 of the Z directed field in Gauss for
the 1st, 40th and 60th apertures respectively of the magnet 1700 of figure 17 versus
the position along the Z axis in mm. The magnet 1700 of figure 17 is located along
the horizontal axis of the graph in the area labelled as 1700. The vertical dash lines
at each end of the area labelled 1700 represent the boundary between the magnet and
the volume of air above and below the magnet 1700. The graphs correspond to those
of figure 10 for the magnet 900 of figure 9, but are for the magnet 1700 of figure
17. In this graph, the field reduction from the 1st aperture to the 40th aperture
to the 60th aperture has been converted into a field increase. That is, the field
in the 60th aperture is greater than that of the 1st aperture. This indicates that
the strength of the keeper ring is too great. Reducing the width of the keeper ring
reduces this effect to the point where an equilibrium can be found. At this equilibrium
point, the field for the 1st, 40th and 60th aperture as well as for the other apertures
will be approximately equal. The exact size of keeper ring required for any given
magnet depends on all the other factors associated with the magnet such as the magnet
energy, the thickness, the overall area and the ratio of aperture to magnet area per
pixel. Each magnet design will require a unique keeper dimension for optimum flux
linearity in the active display area. The dimension can be determined by iteratively
modelling the keeper dimension until the equilibrium point is found.
[0045] Figure 19 shows four graphs 1758, 1760, 1762, 1764 of the Z directed field in Gauss
for the 58th, 60th, 62nd and 64th apertures respectively of the magnet of figure 17
versus the position along the Z axis in mm. These graphs show the changes in aperture
flux near the magnet edge in greater detail.
[0046] Figure 20 shows the Z directed flux density just above the surface of the magnet
of figure 17. In figure 20 the apertures numbered 1 to 16 are shown. In figure 21
the apertures numbered 17 to 32 are shown. In figure 22 the apertures numbered 33
to 48 are shown. In figure 23 the apertures numbered 49 to 64 are shown. The peak
value of flux above the apertures varies from -1174G (-0.1174T) in figure 20 to -1172G
(-0.1172T) in figure 21 to -1162G (-0.1162T) in figure 22 and to -1141G (-0.1141T)
in figure 23. The peak value above the magnetic material varies from 390G (0.0390T)
in figure 20 to 401 (0.0401T) in figure 21 to 425G (0.0425T) in figure 22 to 586G
(0.0586T) in figure 23.
[0047] As can be seen, the Z directed flux density does not vary to any great extent between
aperture 1 and aperture 48, although there is a small increase from 390G (0.0390T)
to 425G (0.0425T) above the flux density in the magnetic material itself. Between
aperture 48 and aperture 64, although the Z directed flux density above the magnetic
material itself increases from 425G (0.0425T) to 586G (0.0586T), the Z directed flux
density above the aperture itself decreases only slightly between apertures 49 and
64 (-1174G (-0.1174T) to -1141G (-0.1141T)).
[0048] Figure 24 shows the Z directed flux in the keeper ring area and the way in which
the keeper ring 'supports' the flux density near to the magnet edge. The Z directed
flux in figure 24 is represented by the depth of the lattice frame structure shown
in front of the magnet 1700. The 63rd and 64th apertures are shown in the diagram
labelled as 63 and 64.
[0049] Figure 25 shows the modulus of the field in front of the magnet 1700. The magnet
1700 is shown in cross section with aperture 1 at the left hand edge and aperture
64 at the right hand edge. The contour shading clearly shows a small, but improved,
amount of field non-linearity associated with aperture 64, but not with apertures
58 to 63. This contrasts with figure 16 which showed the Z directed field in front
of magnet 900 with considerable field non-linearity near the magnet edge.
[0050] Figure 26 summarises the three cases considered. In figure 26A, the shaded area indicates
the extent of the complete magnet and associated apertures. The magnet is of finite
extent. In figure 26B, the shaded area indicates a single aperture and associated
magnetic material extracted from a sheet of infinite extent. In figure 26C, the dark
area indicates a strip of pixels and associated magnetic material extracted from a
strip with finite width, but infinite length. Note that from symmetry considerations,
only half of the total row of pixels need be examined. Also note that the magnet/air
interface is included at the edge of the strip remote from the plane of symmetry.
[0051] What has been described above is the way in which the magnetic fields balance in
space about the magnet, and methods by which these fields may be evaluated by use
of finite element methods. The findings indicate the presence of edge effects, leading
to field non-linearities near the magnet edges. The use of a 'keeper ring' according
to the present invention to counter this non-linearity has been described.
[0052] The use of such a keeper ring has a further benefit. It provides a means of mounting
the magnet used in the display without obscuring any of the apertures used to form
the active display area. It also provides a region outside the display area where
electrical connections to the tracks formed on the magnet may be easily made. It is
expected in some applications that the width of the keeper ring will be such that
the driver circuits may be mounted in this region, connected to the control grids,
so that the number of connections passing through the vacuum envelope is significantly
reduced.
[0053] The exact dimensions of the keeper ring, having no apertures, required for any given
magnet are determined by the factors mentioned above such as the magnet energy, the
thickness, the overall area and the ratio of aperture to magnet area per pixel. Each
magnet design will require a unique keeper dimension for optimum flux linearity in
the active display area. In the event that only a small keeper ring is required to
linearise the magnetic field over the active display area, additional rows and columns
of apertures may be formed near the edge of the magnet surrounded by the keeper ring.
These rows and columns of apertures are not used in the display for electron beam
collimation purposes, but serve only to assist in field linearisation, whilst making
the keeper ring large enough to allow its use for the mounting of driver circuits.
[0054] In order to ensure that no electrons are admitted to such apertures, thereby disrupting
display operation, a grid 1 track may be added to these apertures and the track held
at a non-select level thereby ensuring that no electrons are admitted to such apertures.
Alternatively, the apertures may be physically blocked by a non-magnetic material
such that the magnetic fields associated with the apertures is essentially unchanged,
but that the passage of electrons is prevented.