BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
[0001] Field of Invention. This invention primarily relates to a midsole of an athletic shoe, particularly a
running shoe. More specifically, it is directed to a lightweight molded, foamless,
shock absorbing mid-sole that will adequately absorb a runner's impact forces and
simultaneously provide durability, longitudinal stability and lateral support.
[0002] Related Art. For years, the athletic shoe industry has continually sought to improve athletic
shoes. In large part, the focus has been upon comfort and absorption of the impact
forces caused by the runner's heel striking the ground. Each prior art shoe and patent
seem to focus upon the improvement of one or two important characteristics of the
shoe design. For example, Cohen, Patent No. 4,754,559 appears to focus upon energy
absorption and is primarily directed to the placement of "ribs" in the mid-sole or,
alternatively, the insertion of tubes into the midsole. Cohen recommends the use of
a "rubber like" material. Another patent, Derderian,
et.al., No. 4,535,553 focuses upon shock absorption and is directed to a midsole combination
of an elastomeric foam and resilient insert member formed of Hytrel 4056.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
[0003] Our invention is a midsole for an athletic shoe. More particularly, it is a molded
midsole formed of an elastomer whose ratio of plastic deformation to elastic deformation
is greater than 1.5 to 1. Preferably, the elastomer is a copolyester polymer elastomer
such as that manufactured and sold by E.I. duPont de Nemoirs under the trademark Hytrel.®
[0004] In the preferred embodiment, the midsole takes the shape of a flexible upper layer
separated from a lower, ground engaging layer by cylindrical shaped springs that are
integrally joined to the upper and lower layers. This midsole has a rear-foot section
in which the springs are in the shape of a plurality of truncated right cylindrical
springs that extend from outside the lateral and medial sides of the shoe to a position
underneath the shoe. Preferably, these individual cylindrical springs are not continuous,
but are interrupted underneath the rear-foot section, and in conjunction with the
lower layer, define a circumferential support surface that extends around the rear-foot
section. The midsole of our invention also includes mid-foot section as well as a
fore-foot section. As will be shown, the cylindrical springs incorporated into rear-foot
and the fore-foot sections are unique and fully provide the desired energy absorption,
longitudinal and lateral support.
[0005] Accordingly, the objectives of this invention are to provide,
inter alia,
1) a unique elastomeric compression midsole that will substantially reduce the weight
of the traditional running shoe while maintaining, if not enhancing, the ability of
the shoe to absorb the impact energy of the runner without transmitting it to his
joints;
2) an elastomeric midsole unit that will provide substantial longitudinal stability
as well as exceptional lateral support;
3) an elastomer midsole that will provide vertical softness and effectively cushion
the runner's impact with the ground while simultaneously providing lateral stiffness;
4) an energy absorbing midsole that will not loose its resiliency over time;
5) a midsole whose resiliency and energy absorbing ability is not affected by moisture
and perspiration;
6) an elastomer compression midsole that is most durable and not subject to tear propagation;
7) a midsole that will substitute stability and support for the mushy feeling left
by some of the foam, air or fluid systems; and
8) a lightweight spring unit for simultaneously absorbing impact energy and for flexing
in response to angular movements.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0006] The manner in which these objectives and other desirable characteristics can be obtained
from this invention is explained in the following specification and attached drawings
in which:
Figure 1 is a perspective view of a running shoe;
Figure 2 is a plan view of the preferred embodiment of the midsole of this invention;
Figure 3 is a sectional side elevation view of the preferred embodiment of the invention,
the view taken along the lines 3-3 of figure 2;
Figure 4 is a perspective view of the preferred embodiment of the bottom of midsole
of this invention;
Figure 5 is an elevational view taken along the lines 5-5 of figure 8;
Figure 6 is another side elevation view of a preferred embodiment depicting the invention
in the flexed position;
Figure 7 is a side elevational view of the rear-foot section of a "preform" of our
invention; and
Figure 8 is a side elevational view of the rear-foot section of the invention after
it has been compressed to eliminate compression set of the plastic material.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0007] The preferred embodiment of our invention is illustrated in one intended environment
in Figure 1. Such includes a running shoe 10 with an upper 12 that completely covers
the foot and has the usual eyelets and lacing 14 on the top with a multilayered sole
20.
[0008] In this case, the multilayered sole 20 comprises the preferred embodiment of the
midsole invention. As shown in figure 3, this midsole is divided into three sections
along its longitudinal axis. These sections include a rear-foot section 24, a mid-foot
section 26 and a fore-foot section 28. These sections and the entire midsole are molded
as one integral piece. Preferably, they are injection molded with an elastomer having
tensile characteristics such that the ratio of plastic strain to elastic strain is
greater than 1.5 to 1. One such elastomer is a copolyester polymer elastomer manufactured
and sold by E.I. du Pont de Nemoirs under the trademark Hytrel.® It is reasonably
inert and significantly, it is quite durable. Moreover, this elastomer is not subject
to tear propagation even when made in relatively thin cross sections. We prefer to
use du Pont's Hytrel® composition no. 5556. (For a more complete description of this
elastomer, see U.S. Patent No. 4,198,037 and the references cited therein).
[0009] From top to bottom, the midsole 20 of this invention includes a generally flat top
ply or layer 32 of elastomeric material from which depends generally cylindrical springs
34 that are integrally joined to a flat ply or bottom layer 36 as shown in figures
3 and 4. The top layer 32 is also directly joined to the bottom layer 36 at the front
33 of the midsole 26, at the mid-foot section 26 and at the rear 35 of the midsole
as shown in figure 3.
[0010] In the rear-foot section, the cylindrical springs 34 are preferably truncated, right
cylinder sections. These springs 34 need not and do not extend completely across the
rear-foot section 24. Instead, these springs 34 are positioned in a generally U-shaped
configuration about the circumference of the rear-foot section, leaving a void or
recess 40 in the center of the rear-foot. The void and the resulting elimination of
material provides substantial weight reduction. Significantly, the recess 40 and the
weight reduction is permitted by the selected material and the manufacturing process
described herein.
[0011] The illustrated interconnections of the upper layer 32 and the lower layer 36 provide
excellent longitudinal stability. In addition, the outward extensions 35 of the cylindrical
springs 34 beyond the circumference of the upper 12 provides a wider platform for
the runner's foot. Significantly, these design of these extensions 35, their length
and the direction of the cylinder sections 34 is used, in part, to control the "roll"
of the runner's foot. In addition and as reflected in figure 4, the wall thickness
of the cylindrical springs 34 of the rear-foot section is thicker on the medial side
of the shoe than on the lateral side. This increased thickness is also used to provide
the desired control of the motion of the foot.
[0012] The extension of the recess or void section 40 from the rear-foot section into the
fore-foot section also provides torsional flexibility to the midsole and to the shoe.
The forward extension of this recess is permitted since the strength of the material
around the circumference of the shoe is more than adequate.
[0013] Support for the fore-foot section of the midsole is also provided by cylindrical
springs as shown in figures 3,4 and 6. These springs 42 have a construction that is
slightly different from the cylindrical springs 34 of the rear-foot section. One difference
is that the springs 42 extend across the entire width of the midsole. In addition,
they are slightly tapered from the medial to the lateral side of the shoe,
i.e., the cross sectional thickness of the cylinder walls is greater on the medial side.
In addition and to provide added flexibility, the cylinder springs of the fore-foot
section are slit as at 44. As best illustrated in figure 6, this slit along the bottom
surface of the cylinder spring and the midsole provides substantial, added flexibility
to the fore-foot. Indeed, as the foot rolls farther forward, the cylinder sections
34 are permitted to open and enhance the flexibility of the shoe.
[0014] In the manufacture of the invention, the midsole 20 is preferably injection molded.
However, it is well known that the Hytrel® material will take a compression set. For
this reason, our invention is molded into a preform, and is subsequently compressed
to take that set. As is taught in U.S. Patent Application, Serial No. 07/823,930 entitled
Radial Elastomer Compression Spring, now U.S. Patent No. 5,280,890, compression of
the Hytrel® material not only causes the material to take a set, the compression also
results in orientation of the molecular structure and enhances the spring characteristics
of the material. The information of that patent is incorporated herein by reference.
[0015] The effect of this compression is illustrated in Figures 7 and 8. Figure 7 illustrates
this taller preform that has been molded but not compressed. After the preform has
been removed from the mold and allowed to coil and stabilize for up to twenty-four
hours, it is then compressed, preferably to a solid position. Upon release of the
compressive force, the upper and lower layers 32 and 36 will partially spring back,
leaving the cylindrical springs 34 in an oval configuration as shown in figure 8.
The midsole takes a "set" in this position. Thereafter, these springs 34 may be partially
compressed during use by the runner, but as his weight is removed, the springs will
return to the "set" oval position shown in figure 8.
[0016] In as much as individuals vary in weight and size, there is no one manufacturing
design for our invention that will accommodate all individuals. Consequently, some
experimentation for each potential application will be required. Nevertheless, a primary,
desirable design procedure to obtain the desired cylindrical wall thicknesses is to
make two or more units with different dimensions, correlate their dimensions to their
resulting spring rate and then interpolate or modify the dimensions until the desired
spring rate is obtained.
[0017] Persons skilled in the art of plastic forming and compression spring design will
discover that many modifications of our invention will also produce satisfactory results.
Elastomers other than Hytrel® may be acceptable for some applications. Similarly,
the dimensions of the cylinders and their wall taper as well as thickness may vary
from design to design. In addition, the process of molding the compression spring
of our invention can also include various modifications. As noted in figures 2 and
3, a lip 22 that conforms to the outer surface of the upper may be added around the
circumference of the midsole. In addition, the top ply 32 of the midsole may extend
completely across the recess to eliminate any void in the heel support. In addition,
an abrasive resistant surface may be added to the lower surface 36 of the midsole.
Finally, the recess 40 may extend throughout a major portion of the fore-foot. These
and other variations, which will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, are within
the intended scope of our invention as claimed below.