[0001] This invention relates to chromatographic systems and particularly to the standardization
of such systems.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Chromatography involves physically separating constituents of a sample in a carrier
fluid and measuring the separation. In gas chromatography (GC) the carrier is a gas
or at least a supercritical fluid which acts similarly in the system. In liquid chromatography
(LC) the carrier is a liquid. In either case a pulse of the sample is injected into
a steady flow of the carrier, and the constituents are adsorbed or absorbed and desorbed
by a stationary phase material in a column. At the end of the column the individual
components are more or less separated in time. Monitoring the column effluent with
a suitable detector provides a pattern of retention times which, by calibration or
comparison with known samples, indicates the constituents of the sample qualitatively
and quantitatively. The main components of such a system are the column, an injector
with a mixing chamber for introducing the sample into the carrier, a detector at the
outlet end of the column, fluid controls, and a computer for processing and displaying
the output of the detector. The display is generally in the form of retention times.
In GC an oven generally is used to elevate temperature to maintain the sample in a
volatile state, and to improve the discrimination of constituents. Various gas chromatographic
systems are disclosed in U.S. patent Nos. 5,405,432, 5,545,252 ("Hinshaw 1"), U.S.
patent application serial No. 08/734,689 filed October 21, 1996 ("Hinshaw 2"), and
an article "The Effects of Inlet Liner Configuration and Septum Purge Flow Rate on
Discrimination in Splitless Injection" by J.V. Hinshaw, J. High Resolution Chromatography
16, 247-253 (April 1993). A liquid chromatographic system is disclosed in U.S. patent
No. 4,579,663.
[0003] Interpretations of retention time patterns in chromatography tend to require skill
and experience, as different systems and particularly different columns behave differently
so as to effect different patterns for the same sample material. An operator selects
operating parameters, such as temperature and pressure, or may vary these parameters
during a run, according to judgment. Thus uses of these systems for evaluating samples
is dependent on the skills of the operators, and it has been difficult to compare
results of different systems, columns and operators.
[0004] When a chromatographic method is developed it is often desirable to transfer it to
the same system at a later time, the same system with a different column, or another
system. The task is made more complicated by other factors including different calibrations
of temperatures and pressures, and different oven geometries resulting in different
temperature gradients. Differing characteristics of columns include length, internal
diameter, phase thickness and phase chemistry, and these characteristics are difficult
to determine with precision without destroying the column. These variations in systems,
particularly columns, cause the retention times to change for different systems and
the same system at different times, even switching the order of some peaks. Recalibration
is complex and can be time consuming. Standardization would be desirable, such as
is done in optical spectroscopy, for example as disclosed in U.S. patent No. 5,303,165
(Ganz et al.) It would be particularly desirable to be able to provide a useful library
of basic standards associated with specified types of columns, so that chromatographic
results may be compared universally.
[0005] Objects of the invention are to provide a novel method and a novel means for standardizing
chromatographic systems so as to allow direct comparison of information generated
from different systems and the same system at different times, including different
chromatographic columns and the same column at different times. Particular objects
are to provide a novel method and a novel means for establishing certain operating
parameters for each chromatographic system such that retention times are substantially
identical for different systems and the same system at different times. Other objects
are to provide a novel method and a novel means for optimizing parameters for chromatographic
systems. Additional objects are to provide a novel method and a novel means for measuring
temperature of chromatographic columns, particularly to further standardization, and
also to provide a novel method and a novel means for validating chromatographic systems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The foregoing and other objects are achieved, at least in part, by a method and a
means for standardizing a target chromatographic system with a primary chromatographic
system. Each system includes carrier means for passing a fluid carrier through the
column, injection means for injecting a pulse of sample into the carrier to effect
a mixture passing through the column subject to characteristic retention times for
constituents of the sample, detector means receptive of the mixture for effecting
signals representative of the retention times, and processing means receptive of the
signals for presenting corresponding retention indicators. Each system has system
parameters and operating parameters, the operating parameters comprising a first parameter
having selectable first programming and a second parameter having selectable second
programming, each programming being with respect to time. The retention times are
related to the system parameters and the operating parameters by a mathematical function
having function parameters including thermodynamic constants associated with interactions
of the constituents with the column.
[0007] In preferred embodiments, the system is a gas chromatographic system with a gas carrier,
the first parameter is column temperature and the second parameter is inlet pressure
of the carrier to the column. Also, preferably, the retention indicators are retention
times, and the system parameters include column dimensions.
[0008] The primary system is operated with a standard sample, a selected primary second
program (e.g. pressure) for the second parameter, and a plurality of selected primary
first programs (e.g. temperature) for the first parameter, so as to generate corresponding
primary retention indicators (e.g. times). The primary retention indicators and the
first programs are fitted to the function, with the second program, so as to determine
thermodynamic constants whereby the function is representative of a virtual chromatographic
system. The thermodynamic constants are stored for future application with the target
chromatographic system.
[0009] A target chromatographic system is initially operated with the standard sample, substantially
the primary second program, and a plurality of secondary first programs, so as to
generate corresponding secondary retention indicators. Effective system parameters
(e.g. column dimensions) are established for the target chromatographic system, by
assumption, earlier measurement or a technique according to an aspect of the invention
(explained below). A secondary second program then is determined for which, with the
effective system parameters, the function yields substantially the primary retention
indicators for the primary first programs.
[0010] In an actual operation, the target chromatographic system is operated with a application
sample, the secondary second program and a selected first program, so as to generate
at least one corresponding test retention indicator. By use of such secondary program,
each test retention indicator is standardized to the virtual chromatographic system.
[0011] The function relating retention times to the parameters such as temperature and pressure
are based preferably on theoretical relationships of a chromatographic system. As
such a function generally is complex, special techniques may be required for its application,
particularly in the determination of an effective column dimension and a secondary
second (pressure) program. In an aspect of the invention, a method and a means are
provided for determining values for one or more specified parameters for a chromatographic
system. There are system parameters (e.g. column dimensions) and operating parameters
(e.g. temperature and pressure) related to retention times by a mathematical function
having function parameters including these parameters as well as others such as thermodynamic
constants related to interactions of the sample with a stationary phase in the column.
The function parameters have predetermined or assumed values except for the specified
parameters. A specified parameter may be column inlet pressure, or column length.
[0012] The system (e.g. target system) is operated so as to generate retention indicators.
An initial data base is provided, defining ranges of potential values of the specified
parameter or parameters. Theoretical retention indicators are computed with the function
for the potential values and the predetermined or assumed values, differences are
computed between the theoretical retention indicators and the secondary retention
indicators, and the differences are searched for a minimum therein, such that the
minimum establishes an effective value for each specified parameter.
[0013] In another aspect a method and a means are provided to determine column temperature
of the target chromatographic system relative to that of the primary chromatographic
system. A temperature standard is provided comprising a calibration compound having
temperature dependent retention time, and a plurality of homolog standards having
a homolog relationship between corresponding retention indicators and retention times.
The primary chromatographic system is operated with the temperature standard, a selected
primary pressure program and a plurality of selected calibration temperatures so as
to generate a primary set of retention times for each calibration temperature, each
primary set comprising homolog retention times for the homolog standards and a compound
retention time for the calibration compound. The homolog relationship and the primary
set of retention times are first utilized for each calibration temperature to determine
calibration constants for a temperature relationship relating retention indicator
for the calibration compound to column temperature for the primary system. The target
chromatographic system is operated with the temperature standard and a measured column
temperature so as to generate a test set of retention times, the test set comprising
test retention times for the homolog standards, and a test retention time for the
calibration compound. The homolog relationship and the test set of retention times
are secondly utilized to determine a secondary retention indicator for the calibration
compound. The temperature relationship is applied with the calibration constants and
the secondary retention indicator to determine a calibrated temperature corresponding
to the measured temperature.
[0014] In a further aspect a method and a means are provided for validating a target gas
chromatographic system having a calibrated temperature relationship between its column
temperature and the column temperature for a primary gas chromatographic system. A
validation standard is provided comprising selected validation constituents and a
plurality of homolog standards having a homolog relationship between corresponding
retention indicators and retention times. The primary chromatographic system is operated
with the validation standard, a selected primary pressure program, and a primary validation
temperature for the column, so as to generate primary validation retention times for
the validation constituents and homolog retention times for the homolog standards.
The target chromatographic system is operated with the validation standard, substantially
the primary pressure program, and the measured column temperature so as to generate
secondary validation retention times for the validation constituents and test retention
times for the homolog standards. The homolog retention times are utilized to determine
primary homolog parameters for the homolog relationship, and the test retention times
are utilized to determine secondary homolog parameters for the homolog relationship.
The homolog relationship, the primary homolog parameters and the primary validation
retention times are utilized to effect preliminary retention indicators. The homolog
relationship, the secondary homolog parameters and the secondary validation retention
times are utilized to effect secondary validation retention indicators. The preliminary
retention indicators are adjusted with the temperature relationship to a calibrated
temperature corresponding to the secondary validation temperature so as to effect
primary validation retention indicators. Differences between corresponding primary
validation retention indicators and secondary validation retention indicators are
calculated, and it is determined whether the differences are less than a predetermined
limit corresponding to whether the target chromatographic system is valid.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of a chromatographic system incorporating the invention.
[0016] FIG. 2 is a longitudinal section of a portion of a chromatographic column used in the system
of
FIG. 1.
[0017] FIG. 3A and
FIG. 3B are a flow chart of a method and a means for carrying out an embodiment of the invention
for standardization of a system of
FIG. 1.
[0018] FIG. 4 is an illustration of a series of peaks representing chromatographic retention times
of constituents such as from a sample utilized with the system of
FIG. 1.
[0019] FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a method and a means for applying a function in the embodiment
of
FIG. 3.
[0020] FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an additional method and an additional means for applying the
function in the embodiment of
FIG. 3.
[0021] FIG. 7 is a flow chart of a method and a means for calibrating temperature of the column
of the system of
FIG. 1.
[0022] FIG. 8 is a flow chart of a method and a means for validating the system of
FIG. 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0023] The invention is utilized in an otherwise conventional or other desired gas chromatographic
(GC) system such as described in the aforementioned U.S. patent No. 5,545,252 ("Hinshaw
1") and U.S. patent application serial No. 08/734,689 ("Hinshaw 2"), each being of
the present assignee and incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. A suitable
system is a Perkin-Elmer Autosystem XL (trademark).
[0024] A preferred type of GC system
10 (
FIG. 1) utilizes split flow with back pressure regulation in the manner illustrated in the
aforementioned Hinshaw article, figure 2(b) thereof. A carrier gas from a pressure-regulated
source
12 is supplied through a gas flow controller
14 to an injector device
16, each of which may be essentially any conventional or other desired type. For example,
the flow controller is of the type taught in Hinshaw 2, and the injector is of the
type taught in Hinshaw 1. A portion of the carrier is passed from the injector
16 into and through a chromatographic column
18 formed of a long tube, e.g a fused silica tube 25 m long and 0.25 mm inside diameter,
having a selected stationary phase on the inside column wall such as methyl silicone
0.25 µm thick.
[0025] Most of the remainder of the inlet flow passes out to the ambient space (normally
atmosphere) through a back pressure regulator
13, for example as taught in Hinshaw 2, so as to maintain a constant, selected pressure
of carrier into the column passage. The back pressure regulator is connected to a
split flow outlet
15 from the injector, preferably with a charcoal filter
17 in the line to protect a downstream component from clogging. In one form of pressure
controller,
a variable flow restrictor
19 follows the filter. A pressure transducer
20 is connected to measure pressure at the split flow outlet which is the pressure at
the inlet to the column. An electronic feedback device
23 connected from the transducer to the restrictor is utilized, preferably under control
by computer
30. A conventional purge gas outlet from the injector comprises, for example, a fixed
pressure regulator
27 tapped into the injector and connected to a fixed gas flow resistor
29.
[0026] A sample material is formed of chemical constituents, generally organic molecules
including those containing other elements besides carbon and hydrogen, such as chlorine,
oxygen, nitrogen and/or sulphur. A pulse of the sample is injected from a sample source
into the carrier in the injector device where a mixture is formed with the carrier
gas. The pulsed mixture passes through the column during a time period which typically
is several minutes after the sample injection. In the column
18 (
FIG. 2) a stationary phase of a suitable substance on the tube wall adsorbs from the carrier
gas
21 and then desorbs the chemical constituents of the sample.
[0027] Different constituents have different affinities for the stationary phase and thereby
exit the column at different characteristic times, known as retention times, associated
with different times for retention in the stationary phase. The velocity of the carrier
gas ("mobile phase") contributes to the total retention time; the term "retention
time" means the total time from injector to detector in the stationary and mobile
phases. A detector
26 at the column outlet measures a physical property of the carrier and mixture, the
magnitude of the property changing with each constituent passing through. Various
types of detectors are used, such as hot wire, flame ionization, electron capture,
thermionic and flame photometric. The detector effects signals on a line
28, the signals being representative of the retention times as well as concentrations.
[0028] A computer
30 receives and processes the signals into a series of peaks (called "components") representative
of the sample constituents, the plotted locations of the components representing corresponding
retention times. The computer presents (e.g. on a monitor) corresponding retention
indicators which may be the retention times directly or other indicators computed
from the times such as retention indices (explained below). The peak components may
be identified by an operator or the computer to known chemical constituents, and peak
heights provide a quantitative measure.
[0029] The computer system
30 is conventional and actually may be a combination of processing units including a
main computer such as a DEC PC LP433 incorporated into the GC by the manufacturer
thereof. Auxiliary processing units may include one for automatic sample selection,
another for controlling the oven, and another for communications and pneumatic controls.
These units communicate to the main computer via an interface processor. Each unit
may include appropriate firmware. As this computer system is conventional, and the
details are not important to the present invention, except for an oven controller
46 it is depicted as a single computer
30 in
FIG. 1. Thus the computer generally includes a central processing unit
32 (CPU) with associated memory
34 (RAM); appropriate analog/digital converters (in and/or out as required); disk memory
sections (more generally a computer readable storage medium) typically including a
hard disk
36, laser disk (CD-Rom) and/or means for accessing a floppy disk
38, a keyboard
40 for operator input, and a monitor
42 and/or a printer for presentation of the retention indicators.
[0030] The computer programs for the standard GC operations and the present invention are
written in a conventional language such as "C", "C++", Visual Basic™ and data is managed
by a spreadsheet program such as Excel™. Programming required for the present invention
will be recognized readily from the flow charts and descriptions herein, and can be
achieved by those of ordinary skill in the art.
[0031] The column
18 is enclosed in an oven
44 or the like with the controller
46 to set and regulate the temperature of the column. The temperature is measured with
a platinum resistance thermometer
48 (or other precision temperature sensor) with a temperature signal being passed on
a line
51 to the computer
30. Retention times are temperature dependent, so data usually are taken at one or a
series of known temperatures, optionally with ramping or other temperature program
during a run. Similarly, the retention times are pressure dependent, and the data
also may be taken at one or a series of known pressures, optionally with ramping or
other pressure program. With ramping, the associated parameters include start and
finish values as well as ramping rate and start or finish time for the ramping.
[0032] The term "program", as applied to temperature, pressure or other such parameter,
and as used herein and in the claims, means a fixed level (e.g. isothermal or isobaric)
or a varying of such parameter with time during a run with an injected sample. "Ramping"
is typically but not necessarily a linear change, usually increasing, and a program
may combine fixed levels and ramping, and may include several rampings.
[0033] Thus operating parameters for the system typically include isothermal or other programmed
temperature of the chromatographic column, constant or other programmed inlet pressure
to the column, and composition of carrier gas (which may be a fixed or variable mixture,
for example, of methane/argon or N
2/Ar). Other program parameters may include ramp rates, starting and final temperatures
and/ or pressures, times at each level, and/or initial and final times for the ramping.
A program may be more complex, such as with several fixed levels with ramping between,
or non-linear changes.
[0034] Pressure at the column outlet generally is atmospheric, or may be vacuum where the
GC is used, for example, in conjunction with a mass spectrometer. The outlet pressure
Po is measured with a barometer
49 but ordinarily is not regulated. However outlet pressure could be reset or varied
as part of a pressure program. Another possible operating parameter may be column
length taken from its categorization as a column dimension (described below), as the
column length is readily measured and the column may be cut successively for a series
of system runs, particularly with the primary system discussed below.
[0035] Use is made of theoretical relationships that describe operation of a GC, in the
form of a mathematical function. A suitable function is expressed by or derived from
an integral:

and
tR is retention time,
T is column temperature,
∩(T) is carrier gas viscosity as a known function of temperature,
L is column length (
FIG. 2),
rc is column radius,
pi is inlet pressure and
po is outlet pressure. The term
t0, variously called dead time, mobile phase time or gas holdup time, represents the
time of the pulse in the carrier gas. The term β, called phase ratio, is the ratio
of volume of the mobile phase (carrier gas) to that of the stationary phase, such
that

where
df is thickness of the stationary phase on the column tube wall. Column dimensions for
the column geometry are in the function as
L,
rc and β. The thermodynamic constants
a and
b are related to enthalpy and entropy and, without the constant
c, were discovered to be slightly temperature dependent. To substantially remove this
dependency, the additional thermodynamic constant
c is introduced, and all of
a,
b and
c are deemed to be constant for each sample component, (but generally are different
for different components and stationary phases. However,
c may be quite small and even assumed to be zero if resulting accuracies are sufficient.
Eq. 1 is used conventionally without the
c term which is added according to an aspect of the present invention. Temperature
and/or pressure may vary with time during a run, so solution or application of the
integral depends on which and how these parameters are so varied during the integrating
time from 0 to
tR.
[0036] For constant temperature and pressures the function may be integrated to a form:

[0037] This may used for constant (isobaric and isothermal) conditions or fixed portions
of programs. Otherwise
Eq. 1 is solved by a conventional computational technique such as with Simpson's rule using,
for example, 20 steps.
[0038] Any other suitable function that describes chromatography may be used in place of
these equations. Such function preferably is based on the physics of chromatography
but may include or be based on empirical factors. For example a modification of the
function may be made to compensate for slight leakage of the carrier gas through the
column wall, such as taught in copending provisional U.S. patent application serial
No. filed April 15, 1997 [Docket No. ID4531] entitled "Method and Apparatus to Compensate
for Chromatograph Column Permeativity", by inventors Jerry E. Cahill and David H.
Tracy of the present assignee and incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
[0039] The function (e.g.
Eq. 1 or
2) is stored in computer memory in the form of program code (for the function itself)
and data code (for the parameter data). With either form of the function, the independent
variable of the function preferably (and in the present example) is the column temperature
T (or program thereof), with function parameters including the inlet and outlet pressures
Pi and
Po, the column geometry β,
L and
rc, and the thermodynamic constants
a,b,c. Alternatively, the inlet pressure may be useful as the independent variable in place
of temperature which becomes a function parameter. More broadly, any of the operating
parameters may be used for the independent variable, and there may be more than one
independent variable such as temperature and its ramp rate, or temperature and pressure.
[0040] To implement the invention, with reference to the flow chart
FIG. 3, a primary chromatographic system
52 is provided which should be of the same general type as a target system (discussed
below) including substantially the same type of column. The primary system has established
(assumed or known) primary column dimensions for its chromatographic column. Such
dimensions include the average thickness
df of the stationary phase on the column wall (
FIG. 2), the column length
L, and the column radius
rc, thereby establishing the phase ratio

The thickness may be measured, for example, by weighing of the tube during manufacture
(before and after packing). Alternatively, the column dimensions may be determined
after initial measurements with the primary system, by destruction of the column for
measurement of the thickness and radius, as this column will no longer be needed.
For a packed column, the volume of the stationary phase may be used as a geometry
dimension.
[0041] A standard sample
54 is selected to contain suitable constituents to span the range of expected interactions
of actual samples with the stationary phase. A standard with about 8 to 10 compounds
is useful. The compounds should be selected for suitability with the stationary phase,
for example in a manner taught in an article "Characterization of Some Liquid Phases"
by W.O. McReynolds, J. of Chromatographic Science
8, 685-693 (Dec. 1970), incorporated herein by reference. A suitable standard for a
stationary phase of methyl silicone contains the following: n-nonane, 2-octanone,
n-decane, 1-octanol, n-undecane, 2,6-dimethyphenol, 2,4-dimethylanaline, naphthalene,
n-dodecane, and 2-propanol as solvent.
[0042] The primary system
52 is operated
53 with the standard sample
54, a primary inlet pressure
56 (or, more broadly, a primary pressure program), and with a successive plurality of
selected temperatures
58 for the temperature. Each temperature program may simply be an isothermal temperature
level, or may consist of programming parameters for a run such as initial and final
temperatures, ramping rate and initial and final times for the ramping; any one or
more of these parameters may be varied for successive runs. Selection of temperature
programs should depend on such factors as intended types of application samples and
intended temperature ranges and programming. Examples of four programs are as follows;
the first also shows how the selected programs can be useful for auxiliary purposes
explained below:
1) 120°C for temperature calibration, phase ratio, selectivity validation; 250°C for
temperature calibration; Ramp 80°C to 250°C at 5°C/min, for effective column length.
2) Isothermals at 80°C to 100°C in 10°C steps.
3) Isothermals at 250°C to 300°C in 10°C steps.
4) Ramp from 80°C to 250°C at 5°C/min; ramp from 80°C to 250°C at 10°C/min; ramp from
80°C to 250°C at 15°C/min.
[0043] This operation generates a set of primary retention times (RT's)
60 (which may be converted to other related retention indicators) for each temperature
program, which may be plotted as a primary chromatogram (e.g.
FIG. 4) with a component
61 (peak) for each constituent in the standard sample. These components are identified
62 by operator or a computer program in the conventional manner by comparison with a
list of expected times in a pre-established order, accounting for temperature and
rejecting noise peaks. It is advantageous to pick one standard time and ratio the
other times to that for the selection process.
[0044] For each component from the standard, the primary retention times and the primary
temperatures (or programs) are fitted
64 to the function
66 (
Eq. 1 or
2). The computations for the fitting determine the thermodynamic constants
a,b,c (
68), such that the function relates retention time to column temperature, pressure and
column geometry. All other function parameters are known, including the primary column
dimensions
70. The thermodynamic constants are different for each component, i.e. each constituent
of the sample, and are specific to the chemistry of the stationary phase. The number
of temperature programs needed for a fit is at least as many as there are number of
thermodynamic constants. (A fitting technique - "Application of Function" - is set
forth below.)
[0045] The function with the computed set of thermodynamic constants may be identified to
a virtual (hypothetical) chromatographic system
69, with the pressure and column dimensions being adjustable according to variations
in target systems. The primary system and its column are no longer needed. This virtual
system is deemed to be a standard to compare with other GC systems (herein designated
"target chromatographic systems") that are similar to the primary system, particularly
with the same type of column including stationary phase.
[0046] A combined plot from the functions for all components yields a simulated chromatogram
of the virtual system which essentially will look like
FIG. 4. (Peak heights may be selected arbitrarily to be different for the components to
aid in identification. Peak width is programmed to be similar to that of actual peaks.)
A floppy disk
71 (or other computer readable storage medium such as a CD-ROM or tape) containing the
thermodynamic constants may be provided along with an associated column and a standard
sample. The storage medium may also contain the program base for the function if this
is not already in the instrument computer.
[0047] A target chromatographic system
72 is operated
73 with the standard sample
54 (meaning the original or a substantial duplicate thereof), and with a pressure program
setting
56' substantially as the same primary inlet pressure
56 (or other pressure program); this pressure may not be quite the same as the primary
due to variations in system and settings. However a pressure calibration step is desirable
for example by fully opening the flow valve
19 (FIG. 1) at the split flow exit and stopping carrier flow with the flow control
14 so as to expose the pressure gage to atmospheric pressure and use this as a zero
calibration point
75 (gage pressure).
[0048] A set of temperature values
74 is selected, which do not need to be the same as the primary temperatures. Suitable
temperature programs are two fixed (isothermal) levels at 120°C and 250°C, and a ramping
from 80°C to 250°C at 5°C/minute. Corresponding secondary retention times
76 (or other retention indicators) are determined for the selected temperature programs.
The isothermal retention times have several uses including standardization of systems,
temperature calibration, validation and determination of phase ratio.
[0049] The temperature scale of the target system should be calibrated
78 to effect calibrated temperatures
79, for example in a manner described below using a secondary retention time for an
isothermal for a specified component. Also, at this stage, a validation
80 of the target system (primarily to validate the stationary phase composition) is
desirable, also as described below. If validation does not pass, further procedures
are terminated to locate and fix
82 the problem, e.g. change columns.
[0050] It is necessary to determine the parameters associated with column dimensions of
the target system. There may be circumstances where the column dimensions for the
target system are already established, e.g. in a prior run or by measurements during
manufacture such as measuring the exact amount of stationary phase retained in the
column. In this case the following procedure to determine column dimensions with the
function may be skipped.
[0051] The secondary retention times
76 are identified as target times for the function (
Eq. 1 and/or
2). The target system (particularly the target column) is characterized
84 by reverse application of the function
66, to determine effective column dimensions
86 for which a computation with the function yields substantially each secondary retention
time for the temperature at which the target system was run, using the previously
determined thermodynamic constants
68 and the primary inlet pressure
56. The phase ratio may be determined with the function; however, as explained below,
the phase ratio β advantageously is determined from retention times, so only a parameter
associated with length
L (viz.
L itself or aspect ratio
L/rc) needs to be determined with the function.
[0052] Next, an effective secondary program for inlet pressure
88 is determined
90, again by reverse application of
Eq. 1 and/or
2, for which, with the effective column dimensions
86 and the previously determined thermodynamic constants
68, the function yields substantially the primary retention times
60 for any temperature program, preferably one of the nominal selected temperature programs.
A fixed pressure may be suitable, or a pressure program such as ramping may be advantageous
to achieve suitable equality of retention times. This secondary pressure program
88 may be used
87 in subsequent system operations, or a selected program may be used by calibration.
[0053] For such a selected pressure program, a fixed pressure for the program
88 also provides a second calibration point for effective inlet pressure of the target
system, compared to the pressure setting for the target system. With this point and
the first calibration "zero" point
75 determined as described above, and with assumed linearity, a pressure calibration
87 is established. Any operating pressure
89 (
Pi, fixed or otherwise) may be selected for subsequent operations of the target system.
The proper pressure program setting corresponding to the operating pressure program
is ascertained from the calibration. Using the same procedures with other chromatographic
systems operated for the same selected, calibrated pressure, retention times may be
compared directly The actual pressure settings for the other systems would be determined,
calibrated and scaled in the same manner as in the present case.
[0054] In the foregoing, an ideal goal is to determine the effective column dimensions and
the secondary inlet pressure such that the function yields retention times exactly
equal respectively to the secondary and primary retention times. As this generally
is not quite attainable, the clarification "substantially" is intended to mean within
practical limits of attainability. Details for application of the function are provided
below.
[0055] The target chromatographic system
72 then is operated
91 for sample analysis, using an application sample
92 (usually unknown). For operating parameters, the selected pressure program
89, and any selected program (fixed or ramping) for the temperature
94 are used, preferably with temperature calibration
78. Such operation generates at least one test retention time
96 for each component and each temperature program. By use of the secondary pressure
program (fixed or ramping), the test retention times are thereby standardized to the
virtual chromatographic system
69, and may be utilized for analysis
98 of the application sample. Similar operations with other application samples and
other target systems provide retention times that, after normalization to a selected
temperature by use of the function, may be compared directly. This also allows computer
comparison and identification with a library of such times for selected chemical constituents.
[0056] In the foregoing, temperature is selected conveniently as the independent variable
with the pressure program as a parameter in the function. These roles could be reversed,
with pressure as the independent variable. More broadly, any of the other operating
parameters could be used in these roles, namely outlet pressure, ramping rates and
times (or other program parameters), carrier gas composition (affecting viscosity
∩), column length, and even another column parameter such as stationary phase composition
or thickness if such can be varied controllably for a set of runs. Moreover, more
than one of these variables could be used in each role at the same time, e.g. adding
ramping to temperature. As used herein and in the claims the term "first parameter"
means the independent variable (temperature in the above example), and "second parameter"
means the parameter (e.g. inlet pressure) that is adjusted to standardize the target
system to the virtual system.
[0057] As the function (
Eq. 1 or
2) of the present embodiment includes inlet pressure, it is preferable that the system
utilize back pressure regulation of the split flow so that inlet pressure be controlled
and known directly. However, the invention could be utilized with flow regulation
of the split flow such as disclosed in Hinshaw 1, provided inlet pressure to the column
is measured and preferably is reproducible. Alternatively, with such a flow regulation
system, a function may be derived with column flow rate as a first or second parameter
in place of pressure, such flow rate being reproducible and measured directly or ascertained
by subtraction.
[0058] The invention may be used with a supercritical fluid for the carrier. In this case
the term "gas" herein includes such fluid and the procedures are substantially the
same as described herein including use of the same or other suitable function that
describes the chromatography. The invention also may be utilized in a liquid chromatographic
(LC) system with a liquid carrier such as the type described in the aforementioned
U.S. patent No. 4,579,663. For LC additional consideration is given to interactions
of the sample with the liquid carrier.
Column Dimensions
[0059] Characterizing
84 the effective column dimensions
86 (
FIG. 3) for the target column conveniently has two aspects. The phase ratio β may be determined
directly from a retention time. Other column dimensions are ascertained as described
below by application of the function.
[0060] Phase ratio

in the primary dimensions
70 for the primary column (β
p) preferably is determined from actual measurements on the column, by destruction
if necessary. Although the measurements should be as accurate as practical, absolute
accuracy is not necessary because, in the characterization
84 for target column dimensions
86, the phase ratio for target columns (β
t) is determined relative to a known β
p. The phase ratio also has a relationship

where
k is a capacity factor and
K is a partition coefficient that is constant for a given component, stationary phase
and temperature, so that β is inversely proportional to
k. The latter is calculated from

where
tR and
to respectively are retention time and mobile phase time as defined above. The capacity
factor
k can be calculated from any of the isothermal retention times taken with the primary
and secondary system in the course of the other procedures. The phase ratio for the
target column is related to that of the primary column by

This is used to compute the phase ratio for the column of each target system and
is entered into the function prior to determination of the aspect ratio. The latter
is determined from the function as explained below.
Application of Function
[0061] The integral function (
Eq. 1) is sufficiently complex for there to be no apparent analytical solution, so that
special techniques generally are required for its application. Any standard or other
desired mathematical techniques may be used. In one preferred approach, the dead time
t0 is first determined by using a set of certain homologous standards such as n-alkanes,
the set advantageously being included in the standard sample
54 (
FIG. 3). Each homologous standard has a unique homolog number, such number being an integer
number
Cn of carbon atoms for the n-alkanes. About five or six such alkanes with contiguous
numbers are suitable, such as those having known
Cn numbers from 6 to 10. Retention time
tR is related to this number by a homolog relationship:

where
to is time in the mobile phase ("dead time"), and
g and
h are homolog parameters that are potentially temperature dependent. Other homologous
standards may be used, provided they have identifiable equivalent numbers (not necessarily
integers) in a similar relationship. Determination of standard retention times
tR for the alkanes is included in the operations of the primary system, for at least
one selected temperature. The dead time and constants are determined by fitting the
equation to the measurements of
tR.
[0062] To do this (
FIG. 5), the primary system
52 is operated
53 as before with a sample
200 containing the n-alkane standards (or other homologous standards) using the primary
pressure
156 and one of the selected temperatures
201 to generate alkane retention times
158. Utilizing
Eq. 3 (
164) an algorithm inserts a selected initial value
202 for
t0 and performs a linear least squares (or other statistical) computation to fit
204 the data to generate the constants and a statistical error factor
206 for the fit. The dead time is changed incrementally
207 to a new
t0 208 and the process is iterated
210 until a first value of
t0 214 for each selected temperature is found
212 that minimizes the error within a preset limit and thereby gives a "best" statistical
fit. This also determines the parameters
g and
h (
163).
[0063] As pressures are the same for the several isothermal operations, it may be seen from
Eq. 1a that
t0 is proportional to carrier gas viscosity
∩(T) which is temperature dependent. A data base is stored
216 in the computer for the viscosity over the desired temperature range, conveniently
in the form of parameters for a function relating viscosity to temperature. Values
for other dead times
t0 are obtained for the other relevant temperatures in proportion to the viscosities
at the original and the other temperatures to effect the temperature dependent
t0(T). With these dead times,
Eq. 1 is integrated (e.g. with Simpson's method) over the three temperature programs for
the standard compounds, to provide three equations to solve
218 for the three thermodynamic constants
a,b,c.
[0064] For the dimensions
86 (
FIG. 3) of the target column, the phase ratio β is determined as explained above. The column
length appears in
Eqs. 1 and
2 via
Eq. 1a as an aspect ratio

Thus either this ratio may be determined as a length parameter, or
rc may be estimated and an effective value for
L determined (which corrects for any inaccuracy in
rc). Conveniently the length
L is taken to be the parameter.
[0065] A searching technique may be used for solving the function to determine one or more
parameters such as the length
L. A suitable technique (
FIG. 6) for solving the function involves utilizing a stored initial parameter data base
102 defining tentative values of the length (or other parameter) within a predetermined
range over expected operating conditions, such as from 20 m to 40 m in 1 m increments
for a column having a nominal length of 30 m. (The data actually stored may be the
lowest and highest lengths plus increment value.) Other parameters
104 are known, namely the thermodynamic constants
68 (
FIG. 3), set pressure
56, calibrated temperature
79 and phase ratio β. With the function
66 (e.g
Eq. 1), theoretical retention times
106 are computed
108. Differences
110 ("errors" or "residuals") between the theoretical times and measured times
76 are calculated
112. This is done for each value in the length base and for each of the sample components,
and is presented advantageously in the form of root-mean-square ("rms") residuals.
[0066] The residuals may be plotted against the parameter if desired, or as contours if
there are several parameters in the search, using conventional techniques. Such plot
may be useful in visualizing a search, but is not important to the present invention.
[0067] A search for the minimum may be done manually (e.g. by pointing and clicking an appropriate
monitor display of a plot of the residuals vs. length) or with any available or other
desired computer program. An initial coarse search
122 is advantageous, if not done previously
124, to find the region containing the lowest minimum. There may be mathematically forbidden
areas in the range ("fractal space") which, if found, are assigned an arbitrarily
high value such as 1000. The minimum residual
120 then is determined. (Although not likely for the length
L, in other applications for the searching there may be several minima, and the coarse
search should find the lowest.) A revised (narrowed) length data base
126 with a smaller range such as 2 m around the minimum residual is selected
129,
Eq. 1 is applied again to compute
108 theoretical retention times
106, and residuals
110 from the measured values
76 are recalculated
112.
[0068] When a coarse search cycle
123 is determined
124 to have been done a set number of times (once should be sufficient), a fine search
128 is effected in the revised matrix
126 for the selected region so as to zero in on the minimum in the selected well. This
may be done conventionally such as with linear programming, simulated annealing or,
advantageously, an adaptive non-parametric search such as an algorithm for a downhill
simplex method described in "Numerical Recipes in C" by W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky,
W.T. Vetterling and B.P. Flannery, The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed., Cambridge
University Press (1992). A conventional simplex search program determines the average
of the residuals for two proximate points that define a short line. The program flips
the line over one of the points, redetermines the average and whether it has reduced;
if not the line is flipped over to the other way. The procedure is repeated in search
of lower residuals
129. An advantageous modification to the simplex search shortens the point separations
by a preset factor when the residual average is reduced, or lengthens the separations
by such a factor when a residual average increases, for example by a factor of two
in each case. The starting points may the previously determined minimum and the next
best point.
[0069] When a low residual
129 is found reflecting a "well", a test
130 for a nearly flat bottom of the well is made for the rms residual not to change more
than a preset limit such as 0.00001. If this is not met, the simplex cycle is repeated
133 with a revised data base
126 of lengths selected
129 in smaller intervals around the latest region. If the number of simplex cycles exceeds
a limit
134 such as 500 cycles, a problem is assumed to exist and the program is terminated
136. Otherwise the last low residual is selected as the minimum
131 and this determines
137 the corresponding column length
L or other parameter.
[0070] A similar procedure may be used to apply the function with coarse and fine searching
to determine
90 a secondary pressure program
88 (
FIG. 3). If this is a fixed pressure, an initial data base of a range of potential pressures
is used for the initial parameter base
102 (
FIG. 6) in place of the initial length base, the length
L and radius
rc replace the initial pressure as predetermined parameters, and the measured retention
times are the primary retention times. Otherwise the procedures of
FIG. 6 are substantially the same. In the case of pressure or some other parameters, there
may be several minima from which the coarse search serves to select a lowest minimum
before the simplex search.
[0071] In the case of a pressure program with ramping, the procedures are effected with
a matrix of parameters associated with the program such as ramp rate and initial and
final pressures (thus a 3-dimensional matrix). More broadly, the matrix has as many
axes as variables being considered, e.g. one, two, three or more. Residuals are computed
for all of the compatible combinations in the matrix. For the coarse search, the residuals
are searched by computer program to find the low in the same manner as described above.
For a simplex search with a two-axis matrix, three proximate points are used in place
of two for the averaging of residuals, and a triangle is visualized in place of the
short connecting line. In the search the triangle is flipped over one of its sides
for recomputation of an average. For a three-axis matrix, a pyramid is visualized
with similar flips over an edge.
[0072] The plotting and searching technique may be used for broader purposes, for example
for an operator of a chromatographic system to optimize selected operating parameters
without necessarily being for the forgoing standardization to a virtual system. In
the broader case, the system has operating parameters including selected parameters
for optimization and remaining parameters, and operation of the chromatographic system
is represented by a mathematical function having function parameters including the
operating parameters. The primary chromatographic system is operated with a sample
and selected values for the operating parameters so as to generate corresponding measured
retention indicators. A data set or matrix is provided comprising potential values
of the selected operating parameters over predetermined ranges of such parameters
in predetermined increments, the data set representing combinations of such parameters.
Theoretical retention indicators are computed with the function for the combinations
of such parameters and for the remaining parameters which are known or assumed for
the purpose of the computation. Differences (residuals) between the measured retention
indicators and the theoretical retention indicators are computed. The residuals are
searched for a minimum in the differences, such that the minimum establishes optimized
selected parameters. The system then is operated with the optimized parameters.
[0073] It may be desirable for a plot of the retention times (actual and simulated) at each
stage to be displayed on the monitor for operator viewing. Operator instructions for
proceeding may be entered by way of pop up menus. Software (or firmware) with the
function and the residual plotting and searching means for applying the function,
along with matrix data, may be incorporated into the computer programming of the system,
or may be provided separately such as on a floppy disk.
[0074] It is intended, as an aspect of this invention, that the foregoing searching technique
may also be used directly for determining one or more optimum operating parameters
for a chromatographic system, independently of any standardizing.
Column Temperature
[0075] Temperatures for the primary chromatographic system should be measured as accurately
as practical by conventional means, such as with several thermocouples distributed
in the oven near the column and allowing the system to stabilize at each temperature.
Ultimately, however, the primary system temperatures may be considered to be standard,
and absolute accuracy is not critical, as long as temperatures of subsequent system
columns are accurate relative to the original temperature scale of the primary.
[0076] The operating temperatures of the target column should be determined with precision
relative to the temperature scale of the primary system. Calibration of temperature
for the target column, according to an aspect of the invention, is made with use of
a selected calibration compound. For this, it is advantageous to express the retention
indicator in an alternate form "retention index"
RI, also known as "Kovats Index", as for example in the following references: E. Kovats,
Helv. Chim. Acta 41, 1915-1932 (1958); E. Kovats, Z. anal. Chem. 181, 351-366 (1961);
P. Toth, E. Kugler, and E. Kovats, Helv. Chim. Acta 42, 2519-2530 (1959); A. Wehrli
and E. Kovats, Helv. Chim. Acta 42, 2709-2736 (1959); L. S. Ettre, Anal. Chem. 36
(8), 31A-47A (1964); E. Kovats, in Advances in Chromatography vol. 1 (J. C. Giddings
and R. A. Keller, eds.), M. Dekker, Inc., New York, 1965; pp. 229-247. Retention index
is defined as

where
Cn is a number associated with n-alkanes (or other standards) described above with respect
to the homolog relationship
Eq. 3 which thereby becomes:

[0077] Any arbitrary compound (other than an n-alkane) has a retention index corresponding
to a generally non-integer
Cn determined from
Eq. 4 by measurement of retention time. The retention index for such a compound thus is
relative to the alkane standards, and is substantially independent of most parameters
except temperature. This allows the retention index to be used in systems with varying
parametric conditions while determining temperature dependence. To the extent that
the retention index has a minor dependence on such parameters as pressure, such parameters
should be repeated as closely as practical for successive runs.
[0078] For an aspect of the present invention, at least one temperature calibration compound
is selected, the compound preferably having a retention index that has a relatively
strong dependence on temperature. This compound is included in a temperature standard
sample with the several homologous standards (e.g. alkanes). To cover a desired temperature
range it may be desirable to utilize two or more such compounds such as naphthalene
and anthracene, each being most effective in a separate, narrower range for the temperature
calibration, e.g. 120
°C and 250
°C respectively.
[0079] Advantageously the temperature standard sample (with alkanes and calibration compounds)
is included with in the standard sample with the constituents used to define the virtual
system, so only one set of runs is necessary, and temperature is calibrated simultaneously
with test operations. All or some of the calibration compounds and alkanes may even
be used for such constituents, except to define the virtual system it may be advantageous
to use other constituents that have less temperature dependence. Moreover, such other
constituents may better simulate the range of application sample materials likely
to be tested.
[0080] To establish temperatures, (
FIG. 7), the primary chromatographic system
52 is operated
53 with the temperature standard
152 at a plurality of selected calibration temperatures
154 for the column and with a selected pressure program
56. (For convenience these are included in the same conditions as for the standardizing
runs, with the temperatures used here being one of the isothermal runs. The number
of temperatures depends on the number of constants in
Eq. 5 below, being three in the present case.) This generates a primary set of retention
times for each temperature, comprising homolog (e.g. n-alkane) retention times
158 for each of the calibration compounds and a compound retention time
160 for the temperature calibration compound. After peak identification (not shown) the
homolog retention times and the known retention indices
Cn for the standards are used to determine
162 homolog parameters
g and
h (
163) for the established relationship
164 (
Eq. 3), relating homolog numbers to retention indicators (e.g. indices), these parameters
being temperature dependent. A primary retention index
166 for the calibration compound is calculated
168 from the relationship
164 (
Eq. 4) with the parameters
g,
h and the compound retention time
160 for the each calibration temperature, thereby relating a homolog number at each temperature
for the calibration compound to its retention index. The term
t0 in
Eq. 4 is determined as described above. This homolog number is associated with the calibration
temperature
Tc (
154). A temperature relationship
170 between retention index and temperature is close to being linear with temperature,
but a quadratic fit may be used for accuracy:

where
u,
v and
w are calibration constants
174 that are calculated
172 from the retention indices and temperature data. Several (three in the present case)
primary temperature runs with different calibration temperatures are needed to get
these constants; again these may be combined with the original runs. These constants
may be included in a data disk (or other such medium) along with the program base
for
Eq. 5 if necessary. Advantageously this is the disk that also contains the data base for
the virtual system.
[0081] The target chromatographic system then is operated
73 with the primary pressure program
56 and a selected secondary temperature
180 (or two such temperatures if two calibration standards are used), and with the sample
152, so as to generate a corresponding test set of retention times. The temperature
180 is measured with the scale (which may be arbitrary) associated with the target system.
This operation is a temperature calibration run that for convenience could be the
same as one of the runs for the standardization. These times comprise alkane retention
times
182 and a compound retention time
184. The alkane retention times are used to redetermine
162 new homolog parameters
g and
h (
188) for the established relationship (
Eq. 3), and calculate
190 a secondary compound retention index
192 from the relationship
193 (
Eq. 4) and the new parameters. The calibration relationship
Eq. 5 (
170,
FIG. 7), with its earlier-determined constants
174, is applied with the calculated retention index
192 to determine
194 the calibrated column temperature
79 for continuing with other procedures (
FIG. 3), related to the primary system, that existed at the time of operation the target
chromatographic system. If desired, a series of these temperatures may be determined
to calibrate the temperature sensing system on the target system, so that the sensor
may be used directly thereafter.
[0082] Although retention index is a preferred form of retention indicator for the temperature
calibration, as it simplifies the computations, other forms could be used. The retention
indicator is advantageously in a form that is substantially independent of system
parameters and operating parameters other than temperature, the homologous standards
each having a predetermined retention indicator in such form. Also, the temperature
calibration may be achieved with one or more other homologous standards in place of
the n-alkanes described above, provided such standards have a known, established relationship
to their retention indicators.
[0083] It is intended, as an aspect of this invention, that the foregoing technique for
temperature calibration may also be used directly for calibrating a chromatographic
system, independently of any standardizing.
Validation
[0084] It is desirable to validate the target system, to ensure particularly that the target
column is of the type intended and in satisfactory condition, and more particularly
that the stationary phase chemistry ("selectivity") is satisfactory. Such validation
(
80 in
FIG. 3) may be effected with reference to
FIG. 8. A validation sample
250 has a set of selected validation constituents which may be included in the standard
sample, and advantageously are the same as the constituents used for standardizing.
[0085] Thus, as before, and conveniently during respective operations
53,
73 of standardizing runs with the primary and target system
52,
72, the primary validation retention times
60 and the secondary validation retention times
76 are obtained and identified
62 for the validation sample constituents
250. The temperature programs
58,
74 each preferably includes an isothermal run (advantageously one of the original runs)
with a primary validation temperature for the present case.
[0086] Preliminary retention indices
252 are calculated
168 with
Eq. 4 (
193) (in the same manner as for the temperature calibration with reference to
FIG. 7) and, similarly, secondary validation retention indices
258 are calculated
190. The primary indices are adjusted
254 to the secondary temperature
74 with
Eq. 5 (
170) to effect primary validation retention indices
256.
[0087] The differences
260 between the primary and secondary validation indices are calculated
262. The test for validation
80 is whether all of the differences are within predefined limits; if so, procedures
are continued from the validation
80 with respect to
FIG. 3 or, if not, the procedures are stopped to investigate and fix
82 the problem.
[0088] It is intended, as an aspect of this invention, that the foregoing validation technique
may also be used directly for validating a chromatographic system, independently of
any standardizing.
[0089] While the invention has been described above in detail with reference to specific
embodiments, various changes and modifications which fall within the spirit of the
invention and scope of the appended claims will become apparent to those skilled in
this art. Therefore, the invention is intended only to be limited by the appended
claims or their equivalents.
1. A method of standardizing a target chromatographic system with a primary chromatographic
system, each system including carrier means for passing a fluid carrier through the
column, injection means for injecting a pulse of sample into the carrier to effect
a mixture passing through the column subject to characteristic retention times for
constituents of the sample, detector means receptive of the mixture for effecting
signals representative of the retention times, and processing means receptive of the
signals for presenting corresponding retention indicators, wherein each system has
system parameters and operating parameters, the operating parameters comprising a
first parameter having selectable first programming and a second parameter having
selectable second programming, each programming being with respect to time, and the
retention times being related to the system parameters and the operating parameters
by a mathematical function having function parameters including thermodynamic constants
associated with interactions of the constituents with the column; the method comprising
steps of:
operating the primary chromatographic system with a standard sample, a selected primary
second program for the second parameter, and a plurality of selected primary first
programs for the first parameter, so as to generate corresponding primary retention
indicators;
fitting the primary retention indicators and the primary first programs to the function,
with the primary second program, so as to determine thermodynamic constants whereby
the function is representative of a virtual chromatographic system; and
storing the thermodynamic constants for future application with the target chromatographic
system.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the retention indicators consist of retention times
or retention indices.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the first parameter is temperature of the column.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein each system is a gas chromatographic system, the fluid
carrier is a gas carrier, and the second parameter is inlet pressure of the carrier
to the column.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the system parameters comprise column dimensions.
6. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
initially operating a target chromatographic system with the standard sample, substantially
the primary second program, and a plurality of secondary first programs, so as to
generate corresponding secondary retention indicators;
establishing effective system parameters for the target chromatographic system;
determining a secondary second program for which, with the effective system parameters,
the function yields substantially the primary retention indicators for the primary
first programs; and
further operating the target chromatographic system with an application sample, the
secondary second program and a selected first program, so as to generate at least
one corresponding test retention indicator, whereby each test retention indicator
is standardized to the virtual chromatographic system.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of establishing effective system parameters
comprises characterizing the target chromatographic system with effective system parameters
for which the function yields substantially the secondary retention indicators for
the primary first programs and the primary second program.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the system parameters comprise column dimensions, and
the step of characterizing comprises, for at least one specified column dimension,
further steps of:
providing an initial data base defining a range of potential values of the specified
column dimension;
computing theoretical retention indicators with the function for the potential values,
with the secondary temperature programs, the thermodynamic constants and the primary
pressure program;
computing differences between the theoretical retention indicators and the secondary
retention indicators for the secondary temperature programs; and
searching the differences for a minimum therein, such that the minimum establishes
an effective value for the specified column dimension.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the step of searching comprises adaptive non-parametric
searching.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the step of searching further comprises, preceding the
non-parametric searching, a further step of coarse searching to select a narrowed
data base for the non-parametric searching.
11. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of determining comprises further steps of:
providing an initial data base defining a range of potential values of at least one
parameter for a secondary second program;
computing theoretical retention indicators with the function for the potential values,
with the secondary first programs, the thermodynamic constants and the effective system
parameters;
computing differences between the theoretical retention indicators and the primary
retention indicators; and
searching the differences for a minimum therein, such that the minimum establishes
an effective value for the at least one parameter.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of searching comprises adaptive non-parametric
searching.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of searching further comprises, preceding
the non-parametric searching, a further step of coarse searching to select a narrowed
data base for the non-parametric searching.
14. A method of standardizing a target chromatographic system with a primary chromatographic
system, each system including a gas chromatographic column with associated column
dimensions and a column inlet, carrier means for passing a gas carrier through the
column, injection means for injecting a pulse of sample into the carrier to effect
a mixture passing through the column subject to characteristic retention times for
constituents of the sample, detector means receptive of the mixture for effecting
signals representative of the retention times, and processing means receptive of the
signals for presenting corresponding retention indicators, wherein the systems have
operating parameters comprising temperature programs for column temperature and at
least one pressure program of carrier pressure at the column inlet, each program being
with respect to time, and the retention times being related to the operating parameters
by a mathematical function having function parameters including column dimensions
and thermodynamic constants associated with interactions of the constituents with
the column; the method comprising steps of:
establishing primary column dimensions for the column of the primary chromatographic
system;
operating the primary chromatographic system with a standard sample, a selected primary
pressure program, and a plurality of selected primary temperature programs, so as
to generate corresponding primary retention indicators;
fitting the primary retention indicators and the primary temperature programs to the
function, with the primary pressure program, so as to determine thermodynamic constants
whereby the function is representative of a virtual chromatographic system; and
storing the thermodynamic constants for future application with a target chromatographic
system.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein the retention indicators comprise retention times or
retention indices.
16. The method of claim 14 wherein each temperature program consists of a fixed temperature
or includes temperature ramping, and the pressure program consists of a fixed pressure
or includes pressure ramping.
17. The method of claim 14 wherein the injector has a split flow with regulation of back
pressure constituting the pressure at the column inlet.
18. The method of claim 14 wherein the function is in a form of Eq. 1 where tR is retention time, T is column temperature, a, b and c are thermodynamic constants, β is phase ratio of column dimensions, and t0 is a dead time having a temperature dependence in a proportionality to carrier gas
viscosity having a predetermined temperature dependence.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein the step of fitting comprises further steps of:
providing a plurality of homolog standards having an established relationship between
retention time and retention indicator, the relationship being in a form of Eq. 3 where Cn is a homolog number identified to each homolog standard and g and h are constants potentially dependent on temperature;
operating the primary chromatographic system with the homolog standards at a selected
temperature so as to generate corresponding standard retention times;
fitting the homolog numbers and the standard retention times to the relationship with
a preselected trial value for the dead time to effect a statistical error factor for
the fit;
iterating the previous step with incrementally changed dead times until a first value
of dead time is ascertained that minimizes the error factor, whereby the first value
corresponds to the selected temperature;
determining other values of dead time for the temperature programs from the proportionality
to gas viscosity; and
utilizing the function with the values of dead time to determine the thermodynamic
constants.
20. The method of claim 14 further comprising:
initially operating the target chromatographic system with the standard sample, substantially
the primary pressure program, and a plurality of secondary temperature programs, so
as to generate corresponding secondary retention indicators;
establishing effective column dimensions for the column of the target chromatographic
system;
determining an effective secondary pressure program for which, with the effective
column dimensions, the function yields substantially the primary retention indicators
for the primary temperature programs;
ascertaining a pressure program setting corresponding to the secondary pressure program
from the calibration; and
further operating the target chromatographic system with an application sample, the
pressure program setting and a selected temperature program, so as to generate at
least one corresponding test retention indicator, whereby each test retention indicator
is standardized to the virtual chromatographic system.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein the pressure program setting is the secondary pressure
program.
22. The method of claim 20 wherein the primary pressure program is a fixed primary pressure,
the secondary pressure program is a fixed secondary pressure, and the step of ascertaining
comprises utilizing the fixed pressure as a calibration point for calibrating effective
pressure against pressure settings for the target system, selecting an operating pressure
program, and ascertaining the pressure program setting corresponding to the operating
pressure program.
23. The method of claim 20 wherein the step of establishing effective column dimensions
comprises characterizing the target chromatographic system with effective column dimensions
for which the function yields substantially the secondary retention indicators for
the primary pressure program and the selected value sets.
24. The method of claim 23 wherein the column comprises a stationary phase having an effective
phase thickness, and the column dimensions comprise the phase thickness, column length,
and column radius.
25. The method of claim 24 wherein the step of characterizing comprises, for at least
one specified column dimension, further steps of:
providing an initial data base defining a range of potential values of the specified
column dimension;
computing theoretical retention indicators with the function for the potential values,
with the secondary temperature program, the thermodynamic constants and the primary
pressure program;
computing differences between the theoretical retention indicators and the secondary
retention indicators for the secondary temperature programs; and
searching the differences for a minimum therein, such that the minimum establishes
an effective value for the specified column dimension.
26. The method of claim 25 wherein the step of searching comprises adaptive non-parametric
searching.
27. The method of claim 26 wherein the step of searching further comprises, preceding
the non-parametric searching, a further step of coarse searching to select a narrowed
data base for the non-parametric searching.
28. The method of claim 20 wherein the step of determining comprises further steps of:
providing an initial data base defining a range of potential values of at least one
secondary pressure program parameter;
computing theoretical retention indicators with the function for the potential values,
with the secondary temperature program, the thermodynamic constants and the column
dimension including the effective value for the specified column dimension;
computing differences between the theoretical retention indicators and the primary
retention indicators; and
searching the differences for a minimum therein, such that the minimum establishes
effective values for the secondary pressure program parameters.
29. The method of claim 28 wherein the step of searching comprises adaptive non-parametric
searching.
30. The method of claim 29 wherein the step of searching further comprises, preceding
the non-parametric searching, a further step of coarse searching to select from potentially
more than one minimum in the contour plot.
31. The method of claim 20 wherein, to determine column temperature of the target chromatographic
system relative to that of the primary chromatographic system, the method further
comprises steps of:
providing a temperature standard comprising a calibration compound having temperature
dependent retention time, and a plurality of homolog standards having a homolog relationship
between corresponding retention indicators and retention times;
operating the primary chromatographic system with the temperature standard, a selected
primary pressure program and a plurality of selected calibration temperatures so as
to generate a primary set of retention times for each calibration temperature, each
primary set comprising homolog retention times for the homolog standards and a compound
retention time for the calibration compound;
first utilizing the homolog relationship and the primary set of retention times for
each calibration temperature to determine calibration constants for a temperature
relationship relating retention indicator for the calibration compound to column temperature
for the primary system;
operating the target chromatographic system with the temperature standard and a measured
column temperature so as to generate a test set of retention times, the test set comprising
test retention times for the homolog standards, and a test retention time for the
calibration compound;
second utilizing the homolog relationship and the test set of retention times to determine
a secondary retention indicator for the calibration compound; and
applying the temperature relationship with the calibration constants and the secondary
retention indicator to determine a calibrated temperature corresponding to the measured
temperature.
32. The method of claim 31 wherein the retention indicator is in a form that is substantially
independent of system parameters and operating parameters other than temperature,
the homolog standards each having a predetermined retention indicator in such form.
33. The method of claim 32 wherein the retention indicator is retention index.
34. The method of claim 31 wherein:
the step of first utilizing comprises further steps of utilizing the standard retention
times from the primary sets to determine primary homolog parameters for the homolog
relationship, and calculating a primary retention indicator for the calibration compound
from the homolog relationship, the compound retention time and the primary homolog
parameters for each calibration temperature, thereby relating retention indicator
for the calibration compound to column temperature for the primary system; and
the step of second utilizing comprises further steps of utilizing the test retention
times from the test set to redetermine homolog parameters for the homolog relationship,
and calculating the secondary retention indicator from the homolog relationship, the
redetermined homolog parameters and the measured retention time.
35. The method of claim 34 wherein, to validate the target chromatographic system, the
method further comprises steps of:
providing a validation sample comprising selected validation constituents;
operating the primary chromatographic system with the validation sample, a selected
primary pressure program, and a primary validation temperature, so as to generate
corresponding primary validation retention times;
utilizing the homolog relationship, the primary homolog parameters corresponding to
the primary validation temperature, and the primary retention times, to effect preliminary
retention indicators;
operating the target chromatographic system with the validation sample, substantially
the primary pressure program, and the measured column temperature so as to generate
corresponding secondary validation retention times;
utilizing the homolog relationship, the redetermined homolog parameters corresponding
to the measured column temperature, and the secondary validation retention times,
to effect secondary validation retention indicators;
adjusting the preliminary retention indicators, with the temperature relationship
and corresponding primary homolog parameters to a calibrated temperature corresponding
to the secondary validation temperature so as to effect primary validation retention
indicators;
calculating differences between corresponding primary validation retention indicators
and secondary validation retention indicators; and
determining whether the differences are less than a predetermined limit corresponding
to whether the target chromatographic system is valid.
36. The method of claim 35 wherein the retention indicator is in a form that is substantially
independent of system parameters and operating parameters other than temperature,
the homolog standards each having a predetermined retention indicator in such form.
37. The method of claim 36 wherein the retention indicator is retention index.
38. A method of calibrating column temperature of a target chromatographic system relative
to that of a primary chromatographic system, each system including a gas chromatographic
column, carrier means for passing a gas carrier through the column, injection means
for injecting a pulse of sample into the carrier to effect a mixture passing through
the column subject to characteristic retention times for constituents of the sample,
detector means receptive of the mixture for effecting signals representative of the
retention times, and processing means receptive of the signals for processing corresponding
retention times; the method comprising steps of:
providing a temperature standard comprising a calibration compound having temperature
dependent retention time, and a plurality of homolog standards having a homolog relationship
between corresponding retention indicators and retention times;
operating the primary chromatographic system with the temperature standard, a selected
primary pressure program and a plurality of selected calibration temperatures for
the column so as to generate a primary set of retention times for each calibration
temperature, each primary set comprising homolog retention times for the homolog standards
and a compound retention time for the calibration compound;
first utilizing the homolog relationship and the primary set of retention times for
each calibration temperature to determine calibration constants for a temperature
relationship relating retention indicator for the calibration compound to column temperature
for the primary system;
operating the target chromatographic system with the temperature standard and a measured
column temperature so as to generate a test set of retention times, the test set comprising
test retention times for the homolog standards, and a test retention time for the
calibration compound;
second utilizing the homolog relationship and the test set of retention times to determine
a secondary retention indicator for the calibration compound; and
applying the temperature relationship with the calibration constants and the secondary
retention indicator to determine a calibrated temperature corresponding to the measured
temperature.
39. The method of claim 38 wherein the retention indicator is in a form that is substantially
independent of system parameters and operating parameters other than temperature,
the homolog standards each having a predetermined retention indicator in such form.
40. The method of claim 39 wherein the retention indicator is retention index.
41. The method of claim 38 wherein:
the step of first utilizing comprises further steps of utilizing the standard retention
times from the primary sets to determine primary homolog parameters for the homolog
relationship, and calculating a primary retention indicator for the calibration compound
from the homolog relationship, the compound retention time and the primary homolog
parameters for each calibration temperature, thereby relating retention indicator
for the calibration compound to column temperature for the primary system; and
the step of second utilizing comprises further steps of utilizing the test retention
times from the test set to redetermine homolog parameters for the homolog relationship,
and calculating the secondary retention indicator from the homolog relationship, the
redetermined homolog parameters and the measured retention time.
42. The method of claim 41 wherein, to validate the target chromatographic system, the
method further comprises steps of:
providing a validation sample comprising selected validation constituents;
operating the primary chromatographic system with the validation sample, a selected
primary pressure program, and a primary validation temperature, so as to generate
corresponding primary validation retention times;
utilizing the homolog relationship, the primary homolog parameters corresponding to
the primary validation temperature, and the primary retention times, to effect preliminary
retention indicators;
operating the target chromatographic system with the validation sample, substantially
the primary pressure program, and the measured column temperature so as to generate
corresponding secondary validation retention times;
utilizing the homolog relationship, the redetermined homolog parameters corresponding
to the measured column temperature, and the secondary validation retention times,
to effect secondary validation retention indicators;
adjusting the preliminary retention indicators, with the temperature relationship
and corresponding primary homolog parameters to a calibrated temperature corresponding
to the secondary validation temperature so as to effect primary validation retention
indicators;
calculating differences between corresponding primary validation retention indicators
and secondary validation retention indicators; and
determining whether the differences are less than a predetermined limit corresponding
to whether the target chromatographic system is valid.
43. The method of claim 42 wherein the retention indicator is in a form that is substantially
independent of system parameters and operating parameters other than temperature,
the homolog standards each having a predetermined retention indicator in such form.
44. The method of claim 43 wherein the homolog standards are n-alkanes, and the retention
indicator is retention index.
45. A method of validating a target chromatographic system by utilization of a primary
chromatographic system, each system including a gas chromatographic column, carrier
means for passing a gas carrier through the column, injection means for injecting
a pulse of sample into the carrier to effect a mixture passing through the column
subject to characteristic retention times for constituents of the sample, detector
means receptive of the mixture for effecting signals representative of the retention
times, and processing means receptive of the signals for processing the retention
times, the target chromatographic system having a calibrated temperature relationship
between its column temperature and column temperature for the primary chromatographic
system; the method comprising steps of:
providing a validation standard comprising selected validation constituents, and a
plurality of homolog standards having a homolog relationship between corresponding
retention indicators and retention times;
operating the primary chromatographic system with the validation standard, a selected
primary pressure program, and a primary validation temperature for the column, so
as to generate primary validation retention times for the validation constituents
and homolog retention times for the homolog standards;
operating the target chromatographic system with the validation standard, substantially
the primary pressure program, and the measured column temperature so as to generate
secondary validation retention times for the validation constituents and test retention
times for the homolog standards;
utilizing the homolog retention times to determine primary homolog parameters for
the homolog relationship, and the test retention times to determine secondary homolog
parameters for the homolog relationship;
utilizing the homolog relationship, the primary homolog parameters and the primary
validation retention times to effect preliminary retention indicators;
utilizing the homolog relationship, the secondary homolog parameters and the secondary
validation retention times to effect secondary validation retention indicators;
adjusting the preliminary retention indicators with the temperature relationship to
a calibrated temperature corresponding to the secondary validation temperature so
as to effect primary validation retention indicators;
calculating differences between corresponding primary validation retention indicators
and secondary validation retention indicators; and
determining whether the differences are less than a predetermined limit corresponding
to whether the target chromatographic system is valid.
46. The method of claim 45 wherein the retention indicator is in a form that is substantially
independent of system parameters and operating parameters other than temperature,
the homolog standards each having a predetermined retention indicator in such form.
47. The method of claim 46 wherein the homolog standards are n-alkanes, and the retention
indicator is retention index.
48. A method of determining values for one or more specified parameters for a chromatographic
system, the system including carrier means for passing a fluid carrier through the
column, injection means for injecting a pulse of sample into the carrier to effect
a mixture passing through the column subject to characteristic retention times for
constituents of the sample, detector means receptive of the mixture for effecting
signals representative of the retention times, and processing means receptive of the
signals for presenting corresponding retention indicators, the system having system
parameters and operating parameters related to retention times by a mathematical function
having function parameters including the system and operating parameters, and the
function parameters having predetermined or assumed values except for the specified
parameters; the method comprising steps of:
operating the system so as to generate retention indicators, providing an initial
data base defining ranges of potential values of the specified parameters, computing
theoretical retention indicators with the function for the potential values and the
predetermined or assumed values, computing differences between the theoretical retention
indicators and the secondary retention indicators, and searching the differences for
a minimum therein, such that the minimum establishes an effective value for each specified
parameter.
49. The method of claim 48 wherein the step of searching comprises adaptive non-parametric
searching.
50. The method of claim 49 wherein the step of searching further comprises, preceding
the non-parametric searching, a further step of coarse searching to select a narrowed
data base for the non-parametric searching.
51. The method of claim 48 wherein the system is a gas chromatographic system with a gas
carrier.
52. The method of claim 51 wherein the operating parameters include program parameters
of inlet pressure to the column, the system parameters include column dimensions,
and the specified parameters consist of one or more of the program parameters and
the column dimensions.