Background of the Invention
1. Field of the Invention
[0001] The invention relates to the field of papermaking, and, in particular, to an improved
papermaking process utilizing hydrophobic dispersion polymers to increase retention
of fibers onto the paper sheet.
2. Description of the Prior Art
[0002] In the manufacture of paper an aqueous cellulosic suspension or slurry is formed
into a paper sheet. The cellulosic slurry is generally diluted to a consistency (percent
dry weight of solids in the slurry) of less than 1 percent, and often below 0.5 percent,
ahead of the paper machine, while the finished sheet must have less than 6 weight
percent water. Hence, the dewatering aspects of papermaking are extremely important
to the efficiency and cost of the manufacture.
[0003] An important aspect of papermaking is retention of furnish components on and within
the fiber mat being formed during papermaking. A papermaking furnish contains particles
that range in size from about the 2 to 3 millimeter size of cellulosic fibers to fillers
measuring only a few microns. Within this range are cellulosic fines, mineral fillers
(employed to increase opacity, brightness and other paper characteristics) and other
small particles that generally, without the inclusion of one or more retention aids,
would pass through the spaces (pores) between the cellulosic fibers in the fiber mat
being formed.
[0004] One method of improving the retention of cellulosic fines, mineral fillers and other
furnish components on the fiber mat is the use of a coagulant/flocculant system, added
ahead of the paper machine. In such a system there is first added to the furnish a
coagulant, for instance a low molecular weight cationic synthetic polymer or a cationic
starch, which coagulant generally reduces the negative surface charges present on
the particles in the furnish, particularly cellulosic fines and mineral fillers, and
thereby agglomerates such particles. The coagulant is followed by the addition of
a flocculant. The flocculant is generally a high molecular weight anionic synthetic
polymer which bridges the particles and/or agglomerates, from one surface to another,
binding the particles into large agglomerates. The presence of such large agglomerates
in the furnish increases retention. The agglomerates are filtered out of the water
onto the fiber web, where unagglomerated particles otherwise would to a great extent
pass.
[0005] One system employed to provide a improved combination of retention and dewatering
is described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,753,710 and 4,913,775, inventors Langley et al.,
issued respectively June 28, 1988 and April 3, 1990, the disclosures of which are
incorporated herein by reference. In brief, such method adds to the aqueous cellulosic
papermaking suspension first a high molecular weight linear cationic polymer before
shearing the suspension, followed by the addition of bentonite after shearing. The
shearing generally is provided by one or more of the cleaning, mixing and pumping
stages of the papermaking process, and the shearing breaks down the large flocs formed
by the high molecular weight polymer into microflocs, and further agglomeration then
ensues with the addition of the bentonite clay particles.
[0006] Another system uses the combination of cationic starch followed by colloidal silica
to increase the amount of material retained on the web by charge neutralization and
adsorption of smaller agglomerates. This system is described in U.S. Patent No. 4,388,150,
inventors Sunden et all, issued June 14, 1983.
[0007] Greater retention of fines and fillers permits a reduction in the cellulosic fiber
content of the paper being formed. As pulps of less quality are employed to reduce
papermaking costs, the retention aspect of papermaking becomes more important because
the fines content of such lower quality pulps is generally greater than that of pulps
of higher quality.
[0008] Greater retention of fines, fillers and other slurry components reduces the amount
of such substances lost to the white water and hence reduces the amount of material
waste, the cost of waste disposal and the adverse environmental effects therefrom.
[0009] As described in the Langley patents, paper or paper board is generally made from
a suspension or slurry of cellulosic material in an aqueous medium, which slurry is
subjected to one or more shear stages, which stages generally are a clearing stage,
a mixing stage and a pumping stage, and thereafter the suspension is drained to form
a sheet, which sheet is then dried to the desired, and generally low, water concentration.
As disclosed in these patents, the cationic polymer generally has a molecular weight
of at least 500,000, and preferably the molecular weight is above 1,000,000 and may
be above 5,000,000, for instance in the range of from 10 to 30 million or higher.
The cationic polymer is substantially linear; it may be wholly linear or it can be
slightly cross linked provided its structure is still substantially linear in comparison
with the globular structure of cationic starch. Preferably the cationic polymer has
a relatively high charge density of for instance about 0.2 and preferably at least
about 0.35, and most preferably about 0.4 to 2.5 or higher, equivalents of cationic
nitrogen per kilogram of polymer. When the polymer is formed by polymerization of
cationic, ethylenically unsaturated monomer, optionally with other monomers, the amount
of cationic monomer will normally be above 2 mole percent and usually above 5 mole
percent, and preferably above 10 mole percent, based on the total moles of monomer
used in forming the polymer. The amount of the cationic polymer employed in the process,
in the absence of any substantial amount of cationic binder, is typically at least
0.3 percent based on dry weight of the slurry, and preferably 0.6 percent in the substantial
absence of cationic binder and 0.5 percent in the presence of cationic binder, same
basis, which is from 1.1 to 10 times, and usually 3 to 6 times, the amount of cationic
polymer that would be used in conventional (dual polymer) processes, and hence is
considered "an excess amount" of cationic polymer. The cationic polymer is preferably
added to thin stock, preferably cellulosic slurry having a consistency of 2 percent
or less, and at most 3 percent. The cationic polymer may be added to prediluted slurry,
or may be added to a slurry together with the dilution water.
[0010] In the pulp and papermaking industry, the fraction of paper products which do not
meet minimum commercial specifications and therefore cannot be sold is called broke.
The broke, which usually comprises the waste or trimming from the formed web, is a
valuable source of fibers, and is returned for reuse in a papermaking operation at
the same or other mill. The broke derived from paper which contains coating is referred
as "Coated Broke". Coating is applied to paper to improve surface smoothness which
positively influences printability, and, in some cases, to provide a uniform, bright,
opaque layer to cover 'unattractive' base stock. Mills which make use of a relative
high proportion of coated broke in the furnish are confronted with several problems
due to the presence of the coating in their recycled furnish.
[0011] The coated materials contained on coated broke may account for ten (10) to about
forty (40) weight percent of the total solids in the paper furnish. Typically, 80
to 90% of the dry formulation weight of coating is composed of pigments, and 5 to
20% of binders. Coating formulations often contain a large variety of components and
are customized to meet stringent requirements with respect to both the paper coating
itself and the handling properties of the coating dispersion.
[0012] Pigments typically used in paper coating include various types of clays, various
types of calcium carbonates, and titanium dioxide. Other types of white pigments include
satin white, barium sulfate, zinc oxide, talc, plastic pigments, alumina trihydrate,
and titanium dioxide extenders. Organic or inorganic colored pigments are also used
in some cases.
[0013] Coating binders fall into three classifications: starches, proteins and synthetics.
Protein binders are either casein, soy extract, or animal glues. Synthetic binders
are mainly latexes based on vinyl alcohol, styrene butadiene, vinyl acetate and acrylic
polymers.
[0014] Mills which make use of coated broke in their furnish experience problems of sticky
deposits originating from binder materials in combination with pigments and fillers.
These deposits, often referred as "white pitch", can be found throughout the wet end,
the press section, and the dryer section of a paper mill. They may cause operational
problems such as holes or specks in the paper, felt filling, paper machine and coater
breaks, and buildup of deposits on vacuum boxes, drying cylinders and calendar rolls.
The consequence is frequent machine downtime and loss of runnability, and occasionally
also loss of efficiency of chemical additives such as retention aids.
[0015] In the past, cationic solution polymers derived from crosslinked or linear epichlorohydrin
dimethylamine (EPI-DMA), diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC), and ethylene
dichloride ammonia (EDC/NH
3) reactants have been used to treat coated broke (J.E. Pearson; M. R. St. John "Proper
Selection of Polymeric Coagulant for Coated Broke Treatment and Consequences of Selection
on Overall Wet End Chemistry", Tappi Papermakers Conference 1995, p. 523). The goal
of treating the coated broke with these polymers, referred to as "coagulants", is
to anchor white pitch onto paper fibers while the pitch particles are still small
and have not yet had the chance to combine into deposit-forming agglomerates. Coagulants
also act to neutralize the effects of dispersing agents from the coating, which are
detrimental to retention. In addition, coagulants help retain the fine coating pigments,
resulting in improved ash retention. Treatment of coated broke by coagulants is presumed
to be based on a charge neutralization mechanism and is often described as broke cationization.
However, it has been shown that other mechanisms of aggregation, such as charge patch
mechanism and bridging, may play a role in determining polymer activity.
[0016] In addition to the use of coagulants, Pearson has claimed in U. S. Patent No. 5,466,338,
the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, that high molecular weight
dispersion polymers with charge density much lower than that of coagulants can be
successfully used to treat coated broke by coagulating white pitch. These dispersion
polymers offer the advantage of requiring much less elaborate feeding equipment and
will mix more effectively into the pulp system in comparison with high molecular weight
emulsion polymers.
Summary of the Invention
[0017] An improved papermaking process comprising forming an aqueous cellulosic papermaking
slurry and adding a blend of a water-soluble dispersion polymer and a coagulant to
the slurry to increase retention and/or drainage is disclosed. The water-soluble polymer
is formed by polymerizing a water-soluble mixture which comprises: (a) a first cationic
monomer represented by the following formula (I):

wherein R
1 is H or CH
3 each of R
2 and R
3 is an alkyl group having 1 to 3 carbon atoms: A is an oxygen atom or NH: B is an
alkylene group of 2 to 4 carbon atoms or a hydroxypropylene group: and X
- is an anionic counterion, and/or a second cationic monomer represented by the following
general formula (II):

wherein R
4 is H or CH
3: each of R
5 and R
6 is an alkyl group having 1 to 2 carbon atoms: R
7 is H or an alkyl group of 1 to 2 carbon atoms: A is an oxygen atom or NH: B is an
alkylene group of 2 to 4 carbon atoms or a hydroxypropylene group: and X
- is an anionic counterion: and (b) (meth)acrylamide in a aqueous solution of a polyvalent
anion salt, wherein the polymerization is carried out in the presence of either an
organic high-molecular multivalent cation comprising a water-soluble polymer containing
at least one monomer of formula (II) or an alkyl ester of acrylic acid. After addition
of the polymers, the slurry is drained to form a sheet, and the sheet is dried.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0018]
FIG. 1 is a graph comparing turbidity reduction data for a solution polymer referred
to as "coagulant", dispersion polymers, and blends of the two polymers as described
in the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a graph comparing turbidity reduction data for a solution polymer referred
to as "coagulant", dispersion polymers, and blends of the two polymers as described
in the present invention.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0019] It has now been discovered that products obtained by blending a high molecular weight
dispersion polymer and a high charge coagulant show improved activity in improving
retention in the manufacture of paper in comparison with the single components by
themselves. Both high molecular weight and charge are polymer characteristics which
have been previously found to be important for coagulating white pitch. Surprisingly,
a synergistic effect is obtained by blending the two components, and the ability of
these products to coagulate fibers in a papermaking slurry is higher than that obtained
with the two components added at the same time but separately to the papermaking furnish.
[0020] These blends, similarly to their components, do not require the elaborate feeding
equipment utilized by emulsion polymers. The blended composition may also be applied
to the treatment of wastepaper furnish containing adhesives and deinked fiber.
[0021] The blend contains from 5 to 95 weight % dispersion polymer as product. The most
preferred blends contain 25 to 75 weight % dispersion polymer as product, although
the weight % of dispersion polymer contained in the blend which is efficient to treat
the papermaking slurry depends on the nature of the slurry itself.
[0022] The blend is added to the slurry in an amount of from about 0.1 kg product per ton
of total broke solids to about 5 kg product per ton of total broke solids. Most preferably,
the effective treatment rages are between 0.25 kg product per ton of total slurry
solids to about 3 kg per ton, although the treatment level demand for the blends can
vary with the type of slurry being treated.
[0023] Preferably, the dispersion polymer and coagulant are blended as concentrated products
prior to diluting to use levels and adding to the slurry. Alternatively the dispersion
polymer and coagulant may be diluted separately and then added to the slurry.
[0024] The coagulants of the invention are preferably selected from the group consisting
of epichlorohydrin dimethylamine, diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride, polyaluminum
chloride, alum, polyethylenimine, dicyandiamide, ethylene dichloride ammonia and mixtures
thereof.
[0025] The following examples are presented to describe the preferred embodiments and utilities
of the invention and are not meant to limit the invention unless otherwise stated
in the claims appended hereto.
Examples
[0026] Coated broke slurry was prepared in the laboratory from dry broke pulped in Synthetic
Chicago Tap Water # 13 for 1 hour and 45 minutes by using a high consistency pulper,
and successively disintegrated in a standard disintegrator for 10000 to 45000 revolutions
according to the type of broke.
[0027] Reduced specific viscosity/intrinsic viscosity (RSV/IV) measurements were carried
out by capillary viscosimetry under standard conditions (0.125 M NaNO
3, 30°C,). RSV is the polymer reduced specific viscosity at 0.045 % polymer weight.
IV of the polymer is the intercept of the best line calculated from RSV points at
three different polymer weight concentrations. Viscosity of the blends was calculated
on the basis of percent weight of dispersion polymer present in the blend. Such a
calculation allows measurement of viscosity changes that the dispersion polymer undergoes
upon its blending with the coagulant.
[0028] Polymers were diluted to 0.2-0.4% product for activity testing. Polymer activity
was tested in wet coated broke slurry collected at the paper mill or in coated broke
slurry prepared in the laboratory from dry broke as outlined above. A simple turbidity
test used to evaluate polymer activity. To 200 ml of broke in a 400-ml beaker, stirred
at 500 rpm by using a Britt Jar mixer, blends of a dispersion polymer and solution
polymer or individual components were added at 10 seconds. In any case, stirring was
stopped at 30 seconds, and the mixture was filtered through a 100-mesh sieve to the
same volume of filtrate each time. By this method, retention of coated broke particles
is a result of polymer activity and not filtration by the filter medium. The filtrate
turbidity was measured by a standard turbidity meter (2100 N Turbidimeter by Hach
Company) calibrated by using Formazin Primary Standard as suggested by the manufacturer.
Retention was expressed in terms of % turbidity reduction of the filtrate from broke
with no polymer treatment (blank).
Example 1
[0029]
- Polymer A:
- EPI-DMA solution polymer
- Polymer B:
- 90/10 AcAm/DMAEA·BCQ
- Polymer C:
- 50/50 blend polymer A/polymer B
- Polymer D:
- 25/75 blend polymer A/polymer B
- Polymer E:
- 75/25 blend polymer A/polymer B

Dosage curves based on turbidity reduction for polymers A, B, C, D, and E are presented
in Figure 1. The polymers in the example were calculated as product weight, and their
dosage is based on dry weight of coated broke. Figure 1 clearly demonstrates that
polymer C, polymer D and polymer E, which are blends of polymer A and B in various
ratios, exhibit the highest % turbidity reduction per product dose. In particular,
polymers C, D and E have a higher efficiency (retention obtained at a fixed polymer
dosage) than polymers A and B individually. The activity of the blends depends on
the weight % ratio of their product components, the optimal one depending on the nature
of the coated broke treated. Furthermore, it was found that the retention activity
of polymers A and B added separately to the broke is lower than that of polymers C,
D and E, in which the two products are premixed. In particular, addition of 1 kg/ton
of polymer C produces a turbidity reduction of 76.6%, whereas polymer A and polymer
B added at the same time, but separately, to the broke at a dosage of 0.5 kg/ton each,
give a turbidity reduction of only 53.5%. Addition of polymer E at a dosage of 2 kg/ton
produces a turbidity reduction of 92.8%, whereas individual addition of polymer A
(1.5 kilogram/ton) and polymer B (0.5 kilogram/ton) to the broke reduces the turbidity
of only 88.8%.
[0030] As can be seen from the viscosity data reported in Table I, the viscosity of polymer
B varies when this polymer is present in blends with polymer A. Therefore, the viscosity
data suggest the existence of specific interactions between premixed polymer A and
dispersion polymer B. These interactions may explain the enhancement of retention
activity observed for the blend in comparison with the retention activities produced
by the two components added at the same time but separately to the broke.
Example 2
[0031]

[0032] Polymers A, F and G were tested on fresh wet broke used at the mill immediately after
its collection. As shown in Figure 2, polymer G, which is a blend of the coagulant
A and dispersion polymer F, has efficiency and effectiveness considerably higher than
those of the single components of the blend, polymers A and F. The polymers in the
example are calculated as product weight, and their dosage is based on dry weight
of coated broke.
[0033] Also in this case, the viscosities of the dispersion polymer which has been blended
with polymer A is different from that of the dispersion polymer alone. (Table II)
This change in viscosity indicates the presence of specific interactions between the
coagulant and the dispersion polymer. These interactions may explain the retention
activity benefits obtained by using the blends over the single products alone.
Example 3
[0034] The activity of four polymers was tested in a wet coated broke slurry. Polymer A
was an EPI-DMA solution polymer; polymer B was a 90/10 AcAm/DMAEA·BCQ dispersion polymer;
polymer H was a 50/50 blend of polymer A and B, Polymer H and J had the same composition
but differ in the method of preparation. Polymer H was prepared by mixing polymer
A and B as concentrated products. This mixture was diluted to a working concentration
of 0.285 wt % before testing. Polymer J was prepared by mixing diluted solutions of
polymer A and polymer B at 0.285 wt %. Polymers H and J had the same activity. Both
products outperformed their single Components. Additionally, these blends outperformed
their single components added at the same time but separately to the broke. These
results suggest that the dispersion polymer-coagulant interactions invoked to explain
activity enhancement of the blends, are favored regardless of the concentration of
the dispersion polymer and coagulant.
[0035] Changes can be made in the composition, operation and arrangement of the method of
the present invention described herein without departing from the concept and scope
of the invention as defined in the following claims: