FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention is directed to fabrics for paper making machines that are rendered
contamination resistant by a durable coating that lasts the entire life of the fabric,
while not overly limiting the permeability of the fabric.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The modern papermaker employs a highly sophisticated papermaking machine which is
in essence a device for removing water from the paper furnish. The water is removed
sequentially in three stages or sections of the machine. In the first or forming section,
the furnish is deposited on a moving forming fabric and water drained through the
fabric to leave a paper sheet or web having a solids content of about 18 to 25 percent
by weight. The formed web is carried into a press fabric section and passed through
one or more nip presses on a moving press fabric to remove sufficient water to form
a sheet having a solids content of about 36 to 50 percent by weight. This sheet is
then transferred to the dryer section of the papermaking machine where dryer fabrics
hold the paper sheet against hot, steam-heated dryer cylinders to obtain about 92
to 96 percent solids content. The papermaking fabrics employed on the papermaking
machine must perform a diverse range of functions, according to the position on the
machine, i.e., forming, press or dryer section.
[0003] Forming fabrics used in the papermaking process are a kind of papermaking fabric
which are used in the forming section of a papermaking machine. Forming fabrics are
generally constructed of synthetic yarns joined together, ordinarily by weaving, in
a fabric construction that is characterized by a high degree of open spaces between
the intersecting yarns. Forming fabrics must maintain a high degree of openness to
insure that they permit removal of water from the fiber slurry deposited thereon.
[0004] Since water removal capability is a critical function of the forming fabric, it is
necessary to insure that the fabric retains a high degree of openness over its lifetime.
[0005] However, the degree of openness of a fabric is continually reduced during its life.
In addition to the fiber slurry, paper pulp ordinarily contains additives such as
filler clay, pitch, and polymeric materials that clog the open spaces of the fabric.
The use of recycled fibers has introduced considerable amounts of contaminants in
the form of inks, adhesives, tars, and polymeric materials, which also clog the open
spaces of the fabric. In addition, forming fabric designs now include multilayer fabrics
that are more susceptible to contamination problems.
[0006] Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a fabric which exhibits an improved degree
of contamination resistance. One proposed prior art solution is the use of contamination
resistant yarns in the construction of the fabric. This has not proved to be wholly
satisfactory since the contamination resistance provided by such yarns is short-lived
and/or ineffective. Another proposed solution calls for coating or treating paper
making fabrics in order to improve resistance to contaminants. Again, this method
is not wholly successful because the contamination resistance provided by the coating
is short-lived and/or ineffective.
[0007] U.S. Patent nos. 5,207,873 and 5,395,868 describe papermaking fabrics claimed to
have permanent resistance to adhesion of contaminants. The fabrics are coated with
solutions having as their primary components tetrafluoroethylene, urethane copolymer
and polyacrylamide. This coating has not proven to be totally effective and/or permanent
on paper machine clothing.
[0008] One problem generally inherent to coatings or treatments is that coatings per se
are known to reduce the permeability of a fabric, an undesired result that inhibits
water removal capabilities, the primary function of a forming fabric. It is therefore
important that any coating applied to a forming fabric reduce permeability as little
as possible.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] An object of the present invention is to provide a fabric used in the forming, pressing,
or drying section of a paper making machine that exhibits an improved resistance to
contamination over the entire life of the fabric. These fabrics are referred to as
papermachine clothings by those skilled in the art, and the terms are generally interchangeable.
[0010] It is a further object of the invention to provide a durable coating that lasts the
entire life of the fabric.
[0011] It is a further object of the invention to provide a coating which does not significantly
affect the permeability of the fabric.
[0012] It is a further object of the present invention to provide a coating for a fabric
used in a papermaking machine that achieves the aforementioned objectives.
[0013] The present invention is a coated fabric used in a papermaking machine that has significantly
enhanced resistance to contamination which lasts over the entire fabric lifetime.
In another aspect, the invention is a method of coating a fabric used in a papermaking
machine in order to enhance its resistance to contamination. The coating formulations
disclosed herein have been shown to substantially improve the contamination resistance
of a fabric while not significantly reducing the permeability of the fabric, and not
increasing the mass of the fabric to any significant degree. That is, the present
invention provides a thin, low weight coating for a papermachine clothings that adds
limited mass to the fabric.
[0014] The applicants have found that a coating comprised of a silicon-epoxy resin will
render a paper machine clothing contamination resistant over the entire fabric lifetime.
Suitable silicon-epoxy coatings include aqueous mixtures that contain silicone epoxy
resins. It is believed that the silicone-epoxy resins bond with the polyester or nylon
filaments that form the clothing. A suitable line of silicone-epoxy resin compositions
are available from Decora Industries, Fort Edward, New York under the trade name Wearlon®.
A preferred formulation is Wearlon® 2020-98, a three component formulation of a resin
containing a silicone-epoxy based emulsion, a curing agent and a crosslinking agent.
The components are mixed in-situ in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations
and applied to the fabrics and can be further diluted as necessary.
[0015] Effective contamination resistant fabrics have been prepared where the fabric coating
formulation contains 5% to about 50% solids on a weight-weight basis, with a mass
add-on of 0.1 % to 10.0 % based on the weight of the uncoated fabric. The % mass add
on is:

[0016] As a general matter, a greater degree of the original permeability of a coated fabric
is retained when the solids content of the coating or mass add on of the coating is
reduced. Water, a preferred diluent for aqueous based coatings, may be used to reduce
solids content and consequently % mass add on. It has been found that fabrics having
coating formulations of a solids content in the range of 10% to 15 % (w/w) or a mass
add on of 1% to 3% maintain a high degree of their original permeability. That is,
on the order of about 90% - 99% of their original permeability, which is preferred.
In other words, permeability is reduced only about 1% - 10% as a result of the coating.
The fabrics can be coated in any conventional manner, including immersion within a
coating bath, blade or bar coating techniques, squeegee coating, transfer coating,
spray application, kiss or applicator roll, slot applicator, and brush applicator.
Application with a kiss roll has been effective. The coating can be applied in a single
pass, or it may be applied in multiple passes. Subsequent processing requires removing
excess material and then drying or curing the coating as directed by the manufacture
of that particular material. These methods are well known by those skilled in the
art.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017]
Fig. 1 is a photograph of an uncoated section of a contaminated fabric at 5X magnification.
Fig. 2 is a computer generated image of figure 1 with the fabric removed in order
to show the contaminants.
Fig. 3 is a photograph of the coated section of a contaminated fabric at 5X magnification.
Fig. 4 is a computer generated image of figure 3 with the fabric removed in order
to show contaminants, if any.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0018] The following examples illustrate the invention and its applicability.
EXAMPLE 1
[0019] A triple layer forming fabric constructed of polyester filaments was coated on part
of, but not all of its surface with a an aqueous solution of WEARLON® 2020-98 silicon-epoxy
coating (49% solids w/w) available from Decora Industries, Inc. of Fort Edward, N.Y.
The coating formulation was applied in a single layer with a Binks #7 spray gun available
from Binks Mfg. Co. of Franklin Park, Illinois. Excess liquid was removed with a vacuum.
Mass add on was determined as 8.3% based on the weight of the uncoated fabric. Portions
of the belt were not coated in order to serve as a control.
[0020] The fabric was installed on a pilot machine and run for 3 days. The machine was running
pulp consisting of 100% old corrugated container (OCC). The speed of the machine ranged
from 460-670 m/min (1500-2200 ft/min). Needle showers were used at 13.8 bars (200
psi) with no cleaning chemicals. After the trial, the fabric was removed and analyzed.
The following figures relate to the appearance and condition of the fabric after removal.
[0021] A contamination analysis was done on the sections of the fabric. Figures 1 and 3
are photographs taken at 5X magnification of each section. The pictures were then
scanned into the computer with a gray color scale. The image was converted to a bitmap
file (* bmp file), and opened in Microsoft Paintbrush (see Figs. 2 and 4), and the
contaminants were colored in blue. The gray fabric was removed from the image leaving
only the blue portion. This image was then imported into an image analysis program
which counted the blue pixels and found a % contaminated area. The results are listed
below:

[0022] All of the areas of the fabric that were coated exhibited an increase in contamination
resistance over the areas of the fabric which were not coated.
EXAMPLE 2
[0023] Silicone epoxy coating formulations of WEARLON® 2020-98 were applied to fabrics at
solids content ranging from 5% to 25% (w/w). Three coats were applied to a triple
layer fabric via kiss roll applicator. The compositions of the formulations are provided
in Table 1.
[0024] Three separate samples of the coated fabrics were measured for air permeability and
mass add on as a result of coating and the average was taken. At a coating formulation
having 15% solids, mass add on of the coating, when dry, was determined to be 11.18
g/m
2, or 2.7 % based on the weight of the uncoated fabric.
[0025] The coatings were allowed to cure for a period of one week. Three samples were cut
from each of the fabrics per given coating and subjected to high pressure showering
for a period of 8 hrs (oscillating needle showers) under the conditions set forth
below. Data is presented in Tables 2 and 3. Mass, as reported in Table 2, is the mass
of a 2" diameter sample taken from the fabrics.

[0026] Nozzle were spaced 1" apart across the length of the shower arm for uniform coverage.
[0027] Because of the demanding environment existing in a high pressure shower test and
its duration (in this case, 400 psig for 8 hours), the test is a good measure of coating
durability.
1. A contamination resistant papermachine clothing for use in the forming, pressing or
drying section of a papermaking machine comprised of a fabric coated with at least
one layer of a coating containing a silicon epoxy resin.
2. The paper machine clothing of claim 1 wherein the coating is a silicon-epoxy resin
applied from an aqueous mixture.
3. The papermachine clothing as set forth in claim 1 wherein the mass add-on of the coating
when dry is 0.1% to 10.0 % based on the mass of the clothing.
4. The papermachine clothing as set forth in claim 1 wherein the mass add-on of the coating
when dry is 1.0 % to 3.0 % based on the mass of the clothing.
5. The papermachine clothing of claim 1 wherein the coating is applied in at least two
layers.
6. The papermachine clothing as set forth in claim 1 wherein the coating applied to the
clothing is cured.
7. The papermachine clothing as set forth in claim 1 wherein the clothing is a single
layer fabric.
8. The papermachine clothing as set forth in claim 1 wherein the clothing is a multi
layer fabric.
9. A method of rendering a papermachine clothing contamination resistant comprised of
the steps of applying at least one layer of a silicon epoxy resin to a paper machine
clothing.
10. The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the coating is applied by spraying.
11. The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the coating is applied by kiss roll applicator.
12. The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the coating is applied in at least two
layers.
13. The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the coating applied to the clothing is
cured.
14. The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the fabric is a single-layer fabric.
15. The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the fabric is a multi-layer fabric.
16. The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the mass add-on of the coating, when dry,
is 0.1% to 10.0 % based on the mass of the clothing.
17. The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the mass add-on of the coating, when dry,
is 1.0 % to 3.0 % based on the mass of the clothing.