[0001] The invention relates generally to printing on mail pieces, and relates more particularly
to noncontact printing on moving mail pieces, in which the motion is detected in a
noncontact fashion, preferably by detecting the speckle pattern on a mail piece when
illuminated by a coherent, monochromatic beam of light such as a laser.
Background of the invention
[0002] Many decades of experience have permitted development of highly reliable, sturdy,
and inexpensive postage meters (franking machines). These include the many models
of postage meter developed by the same assignee as the assignee of the present invention,
such as the Smile series of meters.
[0003] Notwithstanding the high reliability, sturdiness, and inexpensiveness of such postage
meters, some postal authorities have suggested that such meters be discontinued from
use and that postage indicia be printed instead by means of digitally controlled printers,
typically employing off-the-shelf inks and printing devices. While at first blush
it might seem that such printing methods would be subject to fraud of many different
types, it has been suggested that this great risk of fraud might be protected against
by placing a machine-readable entity such as a high-resolution two-dimensional bar
code in the digitally printed indicium. The bar code would contain information that
has been cryptographically processed to permit authentication of the bar code, and
thus of the legitimacy of the postal indicium.
[0004] A critical service decision of the postal authority is what to do about mail pieces
that have postal indicia for which the bar code cannot be read completely enough to
permit its authentication. One choice is to mark all such mail "return to sender",
a choice which would be extremely undesirable if the result were the return of an
appreciable number of mail pieces which were, in fact, authentic despite having bar
codes that, for some reason, cannot be read in sufficient detail to permit authentication.
[0005] The other possibility is to deliver mail pieces for which the bar code is not sufficiently
readable, rather than to return them to the sender. If such a policy were adopted
and if it were to become generally known, then many parties would be tempted to attempt
to obtain free postal services by using conventional printers to print plausible-looking
postage indicia that contained bar codes with intentionally unreadable bar codes.
[0006] In the face of these concerns, it is immediately apparent to those skilled in the
art that the bar code must indeed be of high resolution, with very little dimensional
distortion. For the designer of a postage printer, however, this is not an easy goal
to achieve. Even the slightest inaccuracy in the measured position (and velocity)
of a mail piece will result in a printed indicium that is stretched, or compressed,
or otherwise distorted in the dimension through which the mail piece moves during
printing.
[0007] Those who are skilled in the art of postage printing will immediately appreciate
that printing on mail pieces is more difficult than other printing tasks, for example
because mail pieces are of varying thickness, are made of varying materials, and each
piece tends to be irregular in thickness. It is, by comparison, quite easy to print
on sheets of uniform thickness, dimensions, and materials. A further difficulty with
printing on mail pieces is that they often move with nonuniform velocity and are introduced
into the postage printer at irregular and unpredictable times.
[0008] A typical prior art way of measuring movement and position of a mail piece is by
means of opposing resilient rollers in gripping contact with the mail piece; a resolver
or other position transducer generates a signal indicative of movement ofthe mail
piece. Such a measurement method has numerous drawbacks. For example, the pressured
contact ofthe rollers with the mail piece can cause the mail piece to flex or otherwise
move relative to the paper path, thus disturbing its position relative to the print
head which is typically an ink-jet print head. Because an ink-jet print head requires
precise positioning relative to its target (here, a mail piece), then the flexing
and other movement caused by opposed rollers may disturb the printing.
[0009] Many other problems present themselves with contact-type movement sensing. For example,
a mail piece of irregular thickness will give rise to inaccuracies in the measured
movement, because the rollers ride up and down the irregularities ofthe mail piece.
[0010] For all these reasons, it is desirable to provide a reliable means of measurement
of movement of a mail piece, preferably a means that does not require contact with
the mail piece.
Summary of the invention
[0011] In a postage printing device according to the invention, a printer is employed to
print postage indicia on mail pieces. The printer is preferably a noncontact printer
such as an ink-jet printer. Printing occurs as the mail piece moves relative to the
print head of the printer, which requires that reliable motion information (e.g. a
print clock signal) be made available to the electronics driving the print head. The
reliable motion is provided in a noncontact way, preferably by directing a laser beam
toward the mail piece and detecting a moving speckle pattern in the light scattered
from the mail piece. In this way, a precise measurement of mail piece movement is
made which permits printing an accurate printed indicium on the mail piece.
Description of the drawing
[0012] The invention will be described with respect to a drawing in several figures, of
which:
Fig. 1 shows a side view of a generalized paper path;
Fig. 2 shows a perspective view of a generalized paper path;
Fig. 3 shows a side view of a paper path according to one embodiment of the invention;
and
Fig. 4 shows a typical speckle pattern as seen at a detector.
Detailed description
[0013] Fig. 1 shows a side view of a generalized paper path. A mail piece 30 moves laterally
(to the right in Fig. 1) past a print head 31, typically an ink-jet print head. (Other
print technologies may be employed without departing in any way from the invention.)
Resilient rollers 35, 36 are positioned opposite each other relative to the paper
path ofthe mail piece 30, and are biased toward each other. A resolver or other position
transducer, omitted for clarity from Fig. 1, may be mechanically coupled with one
of the rollers so as to provide an electrical signal indicative of the lateral movement
of the mail piece 30.
[0014] In some prior-art printing systems the print head 31 moves perpendicularly to- the
movement of the target 30, that is, in and out of the page in Fig. 1. With such a
printer, the usual design decision is to hold the target 30 motionless when printing
is happening, and then to refrain from printing during times when the target 30 is
moving laterally, for example to the right in Fig. 1. Such a system leads to jerky
movement of the target 30, rather than continuous movement thereof. For lightweight
individual sheets of paper this is not unacceptable and indeed many commercially successful
ink-jet printers employ just such a jerky motion of paper through the printer. Because
the paper is motionless at the time of printing, it is a relatively easy matter to
determine when drops of ink should be fired to the paper, because it is only necessary
to monitor the position of the print head as it moves across the paper, and such monitoring
is not mechanically difficult. For example, a plastic tape may be held along the path
of the print head, with an optosensor detecting stripes in the tape. The detected
stripes are used to clock data to the firing actuators of the print head.
[0015] In some other prior-art printing systems the print head 31 is motionless and the
target 30 moves relative to the print head 31 at the time that the print head 31 is
printing. In such a case, a resolver or encoder is used to pick up and measure rotation
of one of the rollers 35, 36, and a signal derived from the resolver or encoder is
used to clock data to the firing actuators of the print head.
[0016] Fig. 2 shows a perspective view of a generalized paper path of a prior-art printing
system of the type in which the print head moves perpendicularly to the movement ofthe
target. The target 30 moves along its paper path as shown by arrow 33. The print head
moves along a guide rail 32, for example in the direction indicated by arrow 34. The
movement of the target 30 stops and starts repeatedly, to permit printing by the print
head 31 during the stopped intervals.
[0017] Fig. 3 shows a side view of a paper path according to one embodiment of the invention.
In this embodiment, an ink-jet print head 31 is positioned relative to the paper path
ofthe mail piece 30. Laser 37 is positioned relative to the paper path and directs
a monochromatic, coherent beam of light 39 toward the mail piece 30. Scattered light
goes in many directions and gives rise to constructive and destructive interference,
sensed in direction 40 by sensor 41.
[0018] The assumption is that the mail piece has a surface that is not shiny, that is, its
roughness is greater than the illuminating wavelength. In this case, the phenomenon
of speckles is observed. The monochromatic laser light is diffusely reflected in all
directions in a random way. This diffuse reflection causes phase shifts in the reflected
light that are highly dependent on the surface structure; the result is a surface
phenomenon.
[0019] When an imaging device is used, it is seen that there are regions of constructive
and destructive interference formed on the device. When a retina of a human eye is
employed as the imaging device, the regions of constructive and destructive interference
are perceived as a pattern of speckles. It is also noted that the speckle pattern
moves if the reflection surface (here, a mail piece) moves. Movement of the speckle
pattern is directly correlated with movement of the mail piece. Fig. 4 shows a typical
speckle pattern as seen at a detector.
[0020] In the system according to the invention, the speckle detection may be in a single
photodetector, such as a photodiode or a phototransistor, or in any arbitrary array
thereof. The photodetector used is not limited to a specific shape or size. CCD-type
sensors of any shape may also be employed. With any of these detectors, a signal may
be derived that is indicative of motion of the mail piece, and may be used to clock
data to the firing actuators of the print head 31.
[0021] Another detection approach is simply to sense the light intensity at a detection
point. As regions of constructive and destructive interference pass by the point,
and the detected signal is a fast sequence of bright and dark events. This sequence
may be evaluated as a frequency. A calibration may be performed that is a function
of the geometrical setup of the apparatus and of the wavelength of light employed.
[0022] The laser 37 is preferably a laser diode. The laser diode may emit visible or infrared
light, as desired.
[0023] While the invention has been described with respect to particular embodiments, it
is not limited thereto. For example, the light source is shown as a laser but the
benefits of the invention present themselves with any source of a monochromatic, coherent
light beam. Those skilled in the art will have no difficulty appreciating that there
are numerous obvious variations which nonetheless fall within the scope of the invention,
as defined by the claims that follow.
1. A method of printing on a mail piece, comprising the steps of directing a laser beam
toward the mail piece whereby light is scattered therefrom, said scattered light defining
a speckle pattern, detecting the apparent motion of the speckle pattern, and operating
a printer opon the mail piece in accordance with said apparent motion.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the printer is a noncontact printer.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the printer is an ink-jet printer.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the laser beam has a source and the detection is performed
at a detector, wherein the printer remains fixed in position relative to the source
and the detector, wherein the mail piece moves relative to the source, the detector,
and the printer, and wherein the printing is performed relative to a clock said clock
depending upon said detected apparent motion.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the laser emits visible light.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the laser emits red light.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the laser is infrared.
8. Apparatus for printing on a mail piece, said mail piece movable within said apparatus,
said mail piece motion defining a paper path, said apparatus comprising a laser positioned
relative to the paper path and directed theretoward, a detector positioned relative
to the paper path to detect laser light scattered from the mail piece, said scattered
light defining a speckle pattern, and a printer positioned relative to the paper path
for printing on the mail piece, said detector disposed to detect apparcnt motion in
the speckle pattern, said printer operatively coupled with said detector to print
in accordance with said apparent motion.
9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the printer is a noncontact printer.
10. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the printer is an ink-jet printer.
11. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the laser beam has a source and the detection is
performed at a detector, wherein the printer remains fixed in position relative to
the source and the detector, wherein the mail piece moves relative to the source,
the detector, and the printer, and wherein the printing is performed relative to a
clock, said clock depending upon said detected apparent motion.
12. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the laser emits visible light.
13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the laser emits red light.
14. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the laser is infrared.