Government Rights
[0001] This invention was made with support by the U.S. Government. The Government may have
certain rights in this invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the invention
[0002] The present invention generally relates to prevention and extinguishment of fires
of combustible materials by utilizing a composition of matter group which is highly
efficient and environmentally friendly. More particularly, the invention relates to
prevention and extinguishment of fires of combustible materials by using a group of
fire suppressants having labile bonds between bromine atoms and atoms other than carbon.
2. Description of the Prior Art
[0003] Fire suppression by halogenated alkanes is well-established in both the scientific
literature and commercial practice as taught, for example, in R.G. Gann ed., Halogenated
Fire Suppressants, ACS Symposium Series 16 (American Chemical Society, Washington,
D.C.) 1975. The two most widely used halogenated suppressants are Halon 1301 (CF
3Br) and Halon 1211 (CF
2ClBr). These compounds are very stable, so they survive long enough in the troposphere
to be gradually transported to the stratosphere, where they are photolyzed by solar
ultraviolet radiation to produce free radicals that catalyze ozone depletion as taught,
for example, in J.G. Anderson, D.W. Toohey, and W.F. Brune, Science, 251, 39 (1991).
Production of these materials has therefore been internationally prohibited after
January, 1994 by the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.
The problem is therefore to find fire suppression materials and methods which are
at least as effective as Halon 1301 and Halon 1211 but which do not deplete the ozone
layer.
[0004] Representative of the prior art directed to the use of fluorocarbons which have no
chlorine or bromine is U.S. Pat. No. 5,236,611 (Shiflet). These fluorocarbons are
slowly transported into the stratosphere, but the catalytic efficiency of fluorine
is very much smaller than that of chlorine, bromine or iodine.
[0005] Representative of the prior art directed to the use of hydrogenated halocarbons,
which are less stable than Halon 1301 or Halon 1211 in the troposphere, are U.S. Pat.
Nos. 5,084,190 (Fernandez), 5,135,054 (Nimitz et al.); 5,093,013 (Sprague); and 5,080,177
(Robin et al.). It is well known that Halons containing chlorine or bromine will suppress
fires in smaller quantities than those which contain only fluorine. However, it is
understood by people practiced in the art of combustion that the principal source
of heat release in hydrocarbon combustion is oxidation of hydrogen atoms to form water
vapor. Thus hydrogenated halocarbons are expected to act chemically both as fuels
and as fire suppressants.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] According to one embodiment of the invention, there is provided a fire suppressant
composition consisting essentially of at least one compound with bromine bound to
atoms other than carbon selected from the group consisting of PBr
3, POBr
3, SOBr
2, BrF
3, BrF
5, PBr
5, TiBr
4, SiBr
4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, BBr
3, C
4H
4O
2NBr, and BrCI combined with a propellant wherein the ozone depletion potential of
the composition is less than 0.1. The ozone depletion potential of such a fire suppressant
composition is defined on a scale where the ozone depletion caused by CFCl
3 is 1.0.
[0007] According to another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a fire suppressant
composition consisting of at least one labile brominating compound selected from the
group consisting of PBr
3, POBr
3, SOBr
2, BrF
3, BrF
5, TiBr
4, SiBr
4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, BBr
3, and BrCI combined with a propellant selected from the group consisting of CO
2, N
2, compressed air, and HCFC-123 (CF
3 CCl
2 H). Preferably, the ozone depletion potential of the propellant of this embodiment
equals 0.016.
[0008] In accordance with the teachings of the present invention compositions of matter
having labile bromine atoms bound to atoms other than carbon have been discovered
to have improved fire suppressant properties and to be environmentally friendly. Compounds
which release bromine atoms and are commonly used as brominating agents in organic
synthesis such as phosphorous tribromide (PBr
3), thionyl bromide (SOBr
2), boron tribromide (BBr
3), and the like are very efficient at extinguishing fires. Moreover, they hydrolyze
or oxidize rapidly in the troposphere and consequently they have no stratospheric
ozone depletion potential.
[0009] Additionally included in this class of fire suppressant compounds of labile bromine
atoms bound to atoms other than carbon are silicon tetrabromide (SiBr
4), titanium tetrabromide (TiBr
4), iodine bromide (IBr), phosphorous oxybromide (POBr
3), bromine trifluoride (BrF
3), bromine pentaflouride (BrF
5), N-bromosuccinimide (C
4H
4O
2NBr) {the bromine is bound to nitrogen, not carbon}, nitrosyl bromide (NOBr) chlorine
bromide (ClBr), and cuprous bromide (CuBr). These compounds are used as brominating
agents in chemical synthesis as taught, for example, in the Merck Index, ninth edition,
(Merck & Co., Rahway, N.J., 1976) or suffer thermal decomposition with liberation
of bromine at temperatures less than 200 degrees centigrade.
[0010] Examples of non-labile bromine compositions are found in such high-melting, ionically
bound salts as lithium bromide (LiBr, m.p. 547° C), calcium bromide (CaBr
2, m.p. 730° C), or chromous bromide (CrBr
2, m.p. 842° C), and other bromine-containing compositions that are thermally and oxidatively
stable according to criteria familiar to people practiced in the art of synthetic
chemistry.
[0011] In order to extinguish fires with a composition having one or more compounds of the
aforesaid class of fire suppressants, equipment for delivering the composition incorporates
such factors as specific geometry, gas flow, and flame conditions. A method of delivery
of a composition having one or more liquid compounds of the aforesaid class of fires
suppressants may employ a nonflammable, pressurized gas to propel the composition
through a nozzle to the flame. Another method of delivery of liquid compositions may
employ a deflagrating solid, gas-generating cartridge, such as is found in automotive
airbags, to propel a mist of liquid to the flame. A third method for delivery of liquid
compositions may employ a pressurized liquid propellant such as liquid carbon dioxide
or liquid argon to atomize and direct a mist of suppressant onto the flame. Other
methods for propelling powders or slurries of solid materials of the aforesaid class
may employ a deflagrating solid gas generating cartridge and a wider nozzle such as
would be used for an ordinary shotgun cartridge. Other methods for propelling gaseous
materials of the aforesaid class may employ mixtures with pressurized inert propellants
to aid transport of suppressant to the flame.
[0012] The primary advantage of the use of the class of fire suppressants of this discovery
is to extinguish fires more efficiently with smaller volumes without depleting the
stratospheric ozone layer. PBr
3, POBr
3, SOBr
2, BBr
3, and the like react rapidly with water vapor or liquid to produce mild acids which
precipitate with normal rain and are ultimately neutralized in soils. The short lifetimes
of these materials also reduce toxicity of the suppressants since their simple acid
decomposition products pose no chronic risk to pH buffered, living organisms.
[0013] These and other advantages and attainments of the present invention will become apparent
to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the detailed description wherein there
are described several embodiments of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0014] In accordance with the teachings of the present invention a class of fire suppressants
which have labile bromine atoms bound to atoms other than carbon are shown in Table
I. These compounds are more effective at suppressing fire than Halon 1301 or Halon
1211 and have no ozone depletion potential.
[0015] The effectiveness of the class of suppressants described herein is a result of the
relative ease with which bromine atoms are liberated in a flame environment. Halons
1301 and 1211 also liberate bromine atoms in a flame; however, the strength of the
C-Br bond in these materials requires higher temperatures or longer interaction times
than the compositions of matter described herein. The stability of the Halons against
oxidation or hydrolysis in the troposphere is one indication of the stability of the
C-Br bond. The compositions of matter described herein are not stable in the presence
of water, oxygen, or heat, liberating bromine atoms under these conditions and thereby
providing a catalyst for flame suppression.
[0016] Another indication of the stability of the C-Br bond is the measurement of its bond
dissociation energy of 68 kilocalories per mole as taught by A.H. Sehon and M. Szwarc
(Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), page 110, [1951]). This energy is larger
than the bond energy of typical P-Br bonds (63 kcal/mole), I-Br bonds (43 kcal/mole),
or S-Br bonds (52 kcal/mole) as taught by Streitweiser and Heathcock,
Introduction to Organic Chemistry, (Macmillian:NY), 1976 and Cotton and Wilkinson,
Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, (3rd ed. Wiley:NY), 1972. As is known to people practiced in the art of chemistry
the interpretation of bond dissociation energies involves approximations based on
the nature of the full molecular fragments (XY
n) from which bromine is liberated according to the reaction:

Thus lower average bond energies indicate the possibility of labile bonds in a group
of materials, but further experimentation with specific materials is requried to establish
the lability of the bond compared with Halons.
TABLE I:
| Composition |
Phase |
% Br |
Comments |
| PBr3 |
liquid |
88 |
brominating agent |
| POBr3 |
liquid |
83 |
brominating agent |
| SOBr2 |
liquid |
77 |
liquid |
| BrF3 |
liquid |
58 |
reactive solvent |
| BrF5 |
liquid |
46 |
reactive solvent |
| PBr5 |
solid |
92 |
brominating agent |
| TiBr4 |
solid |
87 |
reacts with water |
| SiBr4 |
liquid |
92 |
reacts with water |
| IBr |
solid |
39 |
decomposes at 116°C |
| CuBr |
solid |
29 |
brominating agent |
| NOBr |
gas |
73 |
brominating agent |
| BrF |
gas |
81 |
boils at 20° C |
| C4H4O2NBr |
solid |
4.9 |
decomposes at 170° C |
| BBr3 |
liquid |
96 |
boils at 90° C |
| BrCI |
gas |
70 |
decomposes at 10° C |
[0017] In one embodiment of the invention liquid SOBr
2 is introduced as an air-pressurized mist into a 500,000 Btu/hr fire resulting from
kerosene flowing at a rate of 4 grams per second through a nozzle with cross-flowing
compressed air to atomize the liquid into a fine mist. The fire is contained in a
flame holder whose volume is approximately 8 liters and is further blown by an atmospheric
cross-wind of 64 km per hour (40 miles per hour). The fire is reproducibly and irreversibly
extinguished with less than one gram of SOBr
2 in less than 0.2 seconds as confirmed by videotape records of the experiments. The
same fire is not reproducibly suppressed with aliquots of 25 grams of CF
3Br added to the same location.
[0018] In another embodiment of the invention 0.2 cubic centimeters of PBr
3 is mixed with 0.7 cubic centimeters of liquid carbon dioxide. The liquid CO
2 propels the PBr
3 through a valve and into the flame zone, generated as herein above described, as
it is opened, irreversibly and completely extinguishing the flame in the presence
of flowing fuel, air, and hot surfaces.
[0019] Extinguishment of a similar fire, with a hydrocarbon fuel burn rate of 12 grams per
second, by Halon 1301 is taught by Alvarez in chapter 3 of Gann (ibid.) to require
between 90 and 130 grams per second of CF
3Br for suppression. Another example of a gasoline fire with similar heat output is
taught by Ford in chapter 1 of Gann (ibid.) to require between 500 and 1500 grams
of Halon 1301 for suppression. Another fire, in which 10 grams per second of jet fuel
are burned in fast-flowing air at the Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory Engine
Nacelle test facility (Wright-Patterson AFB, OH) requires between one and three kilograms
of Halon 1301 for reproducible suppression. In each of these examples the quantity
of Halon 1301 required to suppress a similar fire is between 100 and 1000 times greater
than that required of the compositions of matter described herein above, of which
SOBr
2 and PBr
3 are specific embodiments.
[0020] The labile bromine atoms and high proportion of bromine in the composition of matter
listed in Table I provide a more efficient fire suppression formulation than the Halons,
which typically have less bromine by weight (Halon 1301 and 1211 are 54% and 48% Br,
respectively) and lesser proclivity for liberating bromine atoms when thermally or
chemically activated in a combustion environment.
[0021] Methods for dispersing gas, liquid, or solid suppressants require designs based upon
such factors as specific geometry of the locus of the fire, flow properties of the
fire suppressants, and flame conditions of the fire. For example, fine mists of liquid
are transported by fluid-dynamical drag forces along flow streamlines in the nacelle
of an aircraft engine. The mists vaporize in hot zones, liberating bromine atoms by
pyrolysis in precisely the regions where the heat released by combustion is most intense.
Inasmuch as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the droplet diameter,
as is known to people practiced in the art of fluid dynamics, there is a range of
aerosol size distributions which most effectively deliver specific suppressants to
specific fires. Another such factor for a gaseous composition is the mixing of suppressant
flow with turbulent flames in a well-ventilated fire, which is affected by the delivery
pressure, the nozzle contour and orientation, the mass-flow rate of the suppressant,
and the fluid dynamical properties of the fire. Dispersing methods designed for suppressing
fire in the nacelle of a jet engine differ from dispersing methods designed for suppressing
fire in the engine compartment of a motor vehicle, the flu of a chimney, or the gas-handling
manifold of a semiconductor processing clean-room.
[0022] Methods for preventing and extinguishing fires of jet fuel using a composition of
matter class which is highly efficient and environmentally friendly is also disclosed
by the present inventors in Final Technical Report FR-4021 (US Air Force Phase I SBIR
Contract F33615-94-C-5005, Nov. 1994).
[0023] Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be understood
that within the scope of this invention various changes may be made in the amount
of fire suppressant, the composition of a fire suppressant mixture, and the method
for dispersing fire suppressants which is generally stated consist of a class of fire
suppressants and methods of dispersing such fire suppressants capable of carrying
out the objects set forth as disclosed in the appended claims.
[0024] While the foregoing description includes detail which will enable those skilled in
the art to practice the invention, it should be recognized that the description is
illustrative in nature and that many modifications and variations will be apparent
to those skilled in the art having the benefit of these teachings. It is accordingly
intended that the invention herein be defined solely by the claims appended hereto
and that the claims be interpreted as broadly as permitted in light of the prior art.
1. A fire suppressant composition consisting essentially of at least one compound with
bromine bound to atoms other than carbon selected from the group consisting of PBr3, POBr3, SOBr2, BrF3, BrF5, PBr5, TiBr4, SiBr4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, BBr3, C4H4O2NBr, and BrCl combined with a propellant wherein the ozone depletion potential of
the composition is less than 0.1, wherein ozone depletion potential is defined on
a scale where the ozone depletion caused by CFCl3 is 1.0.
2. A fire suppressant composition consisting of at least one labile brominating compound
selected from the group consisting of PBr3, POBr3, SOBr2, BrF3, BrF5, TiBr4, SiBr4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, BBr3, and BrCl combined with a propellant selected from the group consisting of CO2, N2, compressed air, and HCFC-123 (CF3 CCl2 H).
3. The fire suppressant composition of claim 2 wherein ozone depletion potential of the
propellant equals 0.016.
1. Zusammensetzung für eine Feuerlöschsubstanz, im wesentlichen enthaltend zumindest
eine Verbindung die Brom gebunden an ein anderes Atom als Kohlenstoff enthält, ausgewählt
aus der Gruppe, die gebildet wird von PBr3, POBr3, SOBr2, BrF3, BrF5, PBr5, TiBr4, SiBr4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, BBr3, C4H4O2NBr und BrCl, in Kombination mit einem Treibmittel, wobei das Potential der Zusammensetzung
zur Vernichtung von Ozon weniger als 0,1 beträgt, wobei das Vernichtungspotential
für Ozon auf einer Skala definiert ist, auf der die Ozonvernichtung durch CFCl3 als 1,0 definiert ist.
2. Zusammensetzung für eine Feuerlöschsubstanz enthaltend zumindest eine labile Bromierungsverbindung
ausgewählt aus der Gruppe, die gebildet wird von PBr3, POBr3, SOBr2, BrF3, BrF5, TiBr4, SiBr4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, BBr3, und BrCl in Kombination mit einem Treibmittel ausgewählt aus der Gruppe, die gebildet
wird von CO2, N2, komprimierter Luft und HCFC-123 (CF3CCl2H).
3. Zusammensetzung für eine Feuerlöschsubstanz nach Anspruch 2, wobei das Ozonvernichtungspotential
des Treibmittels 0,016 beträgt.
1. Composition extinctrice consistant essentiellement en au moins un composé comportant
du brome, lié à des atomes autres que ceux de carbone, choisi dans le groupe constitué
par PBr3, POBr3, SOBr2, BrF3, BrF5, PBr5, TiBr4, SiBr4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, BBr3, C4H4O2NBr et BrCl, combiné avec un propulseur dans laquelle le potentiel de déplétion d'ozone
de ladite composition est inférieur à 0,1 ; le potentiel de déplétion d'ozone étant
défini sur une échelle dans laquelle la déplétion d'ozone provoquée par le CFCl3 est 1,0.
2. Composition extinctrice consistant en au moins un composé bromant labile choisi dans
le groupe constitué par PBr3, POBr3, SOBr2, BrF3, BrF5, TiBr4, SiBr4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, BBr3 et BrCl, combiné avec un propulseur choisi dans le groupe constitué par CO2, N2, l'air comprimé et HCFC-123 (CF3 CCl2 H).
3. Composition extinctrice selon la revendication 2 dans laquelle le potentiel de déplétion
d'ozone du propulseur est égal à 0,016.