Industrial Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to a nozzle used in continuous casting of steel, such
as a submerged nozzle, a long nozzle, etc.
Prior Art
[0002] In the continuous casting of steel, conventionally, Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C nozzles having superior resistance to spalling have been the most widely used.
However, in the case where the nozzles made with Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C material are used for the casting of aluminum killed steel, there arises a problem
of blockage of the nozzle due to the adhesion of Al
2O
3 inclusions in the molten steel. Also, in the case of using the above nozzles for
casting high oxygen content steel, high manganese content steel or stainless steel,
a problem conversely arises in which the nozzles are melt-damaged. The blockage or
melt-damage of nozzles not only causes the deterioration of the service life of refractory
materials, but also hinders the operation of steel manufacture and adversely affects
the quality of steel materials. Accordingly, the development of a nozzle that is free
from blockage and has melt-damage resistance for use in continuous casting of steel
is of great importance.
[0003] Under the circumstances, as a countermeasure to this, Japanese Patent Laid-open No.
3-243258 discloses a nozzle in which materials containing a) not less than 90% by
weight of Al
2O
3; b) not less than 90% by weight of MgO; or c) not less than 90% by weight of ZrO
2 are formed into cylindrical sleeves, and one or two of them are inserted in combination
with each other to be used as a nozzle.
[0004] Further, Japanese Patent Laid-open No. 5-237610 proposes, for the purpose of decreasing
the blockage of the nozzle, the use of a refractory material, as a material for an
interior body of the submerged nozzle, in which respective contents of carbon and
SiO
2 are less than 1% by weight, spinel content is 1 to 40% by weight, MgO content is
0.5 to 15% by weight, and the rest is Al
2O
3.
Problems the Invention Aims to solve
[0005] The main mechanism that causes blockage of Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C nozzles in the casting of aluminum killed steel is as follows:
[0006] Firstly, in a refractory at high temperature, reaction of the following Equation
(1) occurs between SiO
2 and C used as raw materials. SiO (gas phase, hereinafter referred to as (g)) and
CO (g) diffuse at the interface between the nozzle and molten steel, and reactions
with Al in the molten steel occur in accordance with the following Equations (2) and
(3). As a result, a network layer of alumina is formed on the working surface of the
nozzle and melt-adhered onto the nozzle surface to initiate the adhesion of Al
2O
3 infusions thereto. As the adhesion of Al
2O
3 infusions progress, nozzle blockage will become worse.
SiO
2(s) + C(s) = SiO(g) + CO(g) (1)
3SiO(g) + 2
Al = Al
2O
3(s) + 3
Si (2)
3CO(g) + 2
Al = Al
2O
3(s) + 3
C (3)
[0007] In the above equations, (s) represents solid phase, and
Al,
Si and
C each represent the molten Al, Si and C in the molten steel.
[0008] On the other hand, the mechanism of melt-damage of Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C nozzle in the casting of high oxygen content steel, high manganese content steel
or stainless steel is as follows:
[0009] Firstly, carbon in the working surface of refractory material dissolves into the
molten steel. That is, the following Equation (4) is established, and the working
surface is rendered into Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C oxide.
C =
C (4)
[0010] Thereafter,
Mn,
O, and
Fe in the molten steel penetrate, in the form of MnO and FeO, into the working surface.
That is, the following Equations (5) and (6) are established.
Mn +
O = (MnO) (5)
Fe +
O = (FeO) (6)
[0011] Furthermore, MnO-FeO inclusions in the molten steel collide onto the working surface,
and are adhered thereonto. The MnO and FeO that have penetrated into the working surface
because of the above two reasons, react with Al
2O
3 and SiO
2 in the working surface to form a liquid slag of Al
2O
3-SiO
2-MnO-FeO. When the slag is lost in the stream of molten steel, the melt-damage of
refractory material is caused.
[0012] However, the above-mentioned conventional nozzles are effective in some extent to
prevent the blockage of nozzles but less effective in suppressing the melt-damage
of nozzles. Conversely, some conventional nozzle may suppress the melt-damage of nozzles
but not the blockage of nozzles.
[0013] Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a nozzle for use in
continuous casting of steel, which can overcome the above-mentioned problems, and
is free from blockage and has melt-damage resistance.
Means for Solving the Problem
[0014] A nozzle for use in continuous casting of steel according to the present invention
is characterized in that at least an interior surface of the nozzle and/or portions
that come into contact with molten steel are composed of a refractory material comprising,
as mineral phase, spinel, or spinel and periclase.
[0015] Further, a nozzle for use in continuous casting of steel according to the present
invention is characterized in that the refractory material of at least the interior
surface of the nozzle and/or the portions that come into contact with molten steel
are manufactured by using spinel raw materials.
[0016] Still further, a nozzle for use in continuous casting of steel according to the present
invention is characterized in that the refractory material of at least the interior
surface of the nozzle and/or the portions that come into contact with molten steel
are composed of raw refractory material having a grain size of 1,000 µm or less and
in which the ratio of grains of 500 µm or less is at least 60% by weight.
[0017] Furthermore, a nozzle for use in continuous casting of steel according to the present
invention is characterized in that the thickness of the refractory material of at
least the interior surface of the nozzle and/or the portions that come into contact
with molten steel are 2 to 20 mm.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0018]
Fig. 1 shows an embodiment of a distribution pattern of materials in a nozzle of the
present invention;
Fig. 2 shows another embodiment of the distribution pattern of materials in the nozzle
of the present invention;
Fig. 3 shows another embodiment of the distribution pattern of materials in the nozzle
of the present invention;
Fig. 4 shows another embodiment of the distribution pattern of materials in the nozzle
of the present invention;
Fig. 5 shows another embodiment of the distribution pattern of materials in the nozzle
of the present invention; and
Fig. 6 shows a distribution pattern of materials in a conventional nozzle.
Embodiment
[0019] The present invention will now be described in detail.
[0020] A nozzle for use in continuous casting of steel according to the present invention
is characterized in that at least an interior surface of the nozzle and/or portions
that come into contact with molten steel are composed of a refractory material comprising,
as mineral phase, spinel or/and periclase.
[0021] The refractory material of the present invention does not contain carbon and SiO
2. Accordingly, when the refractory material is used in the casting of aluminum killed
steel, reactions according to the above-mentioned Equations (1) to (3) do not take
place with the result that no network layer of Al
2O
3 is formed on the working surface of the refractory material. As a result, adhesion
of Al
2O
3 inclusions onto the working surface and blockage of the nozzle due to the adhesion
of the inclusions are remarkably suppressed.
[0022] Further, the refractory material of the present invention is a mineral phase comprising
spinel, or spinel and periclase, and contains no free Al
2O
3. Accordingly, when the refractory material is used for the casting of high oxygen
content steel, high manganese content steel, and stainless steel, melt-damage of the
refractory materials may be suppressed.
[0023] These particular reasons therefor may be described based on the experimental results
in the following examples:
- Al2O3 is present in the form of composite oxide (spinel) with MgO to thereby lower the
thermodynamic activity of Al2O3 with the result that MnO and FeO from molten steel can hardly penetrate to the refractory
materials.
- The reactivity between periclase and molten steel is small with the result that MnO
and FeO from molten steel can hardly penetrate to periclase.
- The solid-phase line temperature of MgO-spinel refractory materials exceeds 2,000°C,
which is extremely high, with the result that even if MnO and FeO do penetrate, a
liquid slag phase hardly occurs.
[0024] As described above, the feature of the nozzle of the present invention is to control
the mineral composition of the refractory material to be used. In other words, even
if the refractory material has a similar chemical composition, when the mineral compositions
(crystal structure) are different from each other, the reactivity thereof with molten
steel is naturally different, resulting in a large difference in the melt-damage of
the refractory materials.
[0025] In the present invention, the refractory material of the interior surface of the
nozzle and/or the portions that come into contact with molten steel are composed of
spinel crystal, which is a composite oxide of Al
2O
3 and MgO, or spinel crystal and periclase crystal consisting of MgO. However, when
the refractory material of the present invention is prepared by using a practical
refractory raw material, unavoidable impure minerals may exist therein, which may
be accompanied by unavoidable impure components. It is preferable to suppress the
unavoidable impure minerals as much as possible. Therefore, the content of impure
components other than Al
2O
3 and MgO, which are used for the formation of spinel and periclase, is preferably
3% or less by weight. If the content exceeds 3% by weight, the melt-damage resistance
of the impure minerals that accompany the impure components is so low that the portions
of the impure minerals is melt-damaged earlier than spinel and periclase, which is
not preferable. More preferably, the content is 1% or less by weight.
[0026] The refractory material of the present invention used in the nozzles may be preferably
applied to the interior surface and/or the portions that come into contact with molten
steel of any nozzle used in continuous casting such as long nozzles or submerged nozzles.
With respect to manufacturing the nozzle, the nozzle may be manufactured by the following
methods: A method (simultaneous molding method) may be used, in which the blend of
the refractory raw material of the present invention that forms the interior surface
and/or the portions to come into contact with molten steel and the blend of refractory
raw material that forms the main body of the nozzle are simultaneously pressure molded
to form a nozzle having a predetermined shape. Also, a method (finishing method) may
be used, in which the blend mixed with the refractory raw material of the present
invention composing the interior surface and/or the portions to come into contact
with molten steel is cast-molded or pressure molded into the main body of a nozzle
that has been preformed, then dried and occasionally sintered. In addition, Al
2O
3-C refractory material or Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C refractory material, which has been conventionally used as refractory that forms
the main body of the nozzle, may be appropriately used.
[0027] Examples of distribution patterns of the refractory materials in accordance with
the present invention are given in Figs. 1 to 5. Here, Figs. 1 to 4 show the submerged
nozzles with ZrO
2-C refractory material (3) arranged around a powder line. The powder line is a zone
that comes into contact with a highly corrosive mold powder when the submerged nozzle
is used. Accordingly, Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C refractory material (2) composing the main body of the nozzle has been replaced
in this region by the ZrO
2-C refractory material (3), which has superior corrosion resistance, to reinforce
the powder line zone. Incidentally, the Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C refractory materials and ZrO
2-C refractory materials of ordinary composition may be used, for instance, Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C refractory material composed of 30 to 90% by weight of Al
2O
3, 0 to 35% by weight of SiO
2, and 10 to 35% by weight of C, or ZrO
2-C refractory material composed of 66 to 88% by weight of ZrO
2, 2 to 4% by weight of CaO, and 10 to 30% by weight of C, for example, when CaO stabilized
ZrO
2 is used. Further, CaO stabilized ZrO
2 is widely used as the ZrO
2 raw material, but MgO stabilized ZrO
2, Y
2O
3 stabilized ZrO
2, baddeleyite, etc., may also be used. In Figs. 1 to 5, reference numeral 1 denotes
a refractory material comprising as mineral phase spinel or spinel and periclase,
that is, the refractory material according to the present invention. It should be
understood that the distribution patterns of materials in the nozzle of the present
invention are not limited to those shown in Fig. 1 to 5.
[0028] Also, when manufacturing by simultaneous molding, the raw material blend of the refractory
material such as Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C refractory material composing the main body of the nozzle, which has been mixed
with phenolic resin or polysaccharide as a binder, and the raw material blend of the
refractory material according to the present invention composing the interior surface
and/or the portions to come into contact with molten steel, may be filled into their
given positions in the mold, formed by CIP, etc., and dried to obtain an unfired or
fired product. The refractory material composing the main body of the nozzle and the
refractory material according to the present invention composing the interior surface
and/or the portions to come into contact with molten steel are preferably mixed with
the same kind of binder.
[0029] When manufacturing by finishing, a starting material blend mixed with the same binder
used in the main body of nozzle or a binder such as silicate, phosphate, etc., may
be cast around the main body of a nozzle, which has been preformed by a conventional
method, molded or pressure molded, then dried and occasionally fired.
[0030] However, it is not preferable to insert and load the interior portions (interior
surface and/or portions to come into contact with molten steel), which have been made
separately by pressure molding, cast molding or injection molding, into the main body,
which has been conventionally preformed, because the interior portions do not easily
stick to the refractory material composing the nozzle body. In particular, in order
to maintain stable adhesion when heated at a high temperature in use, the above-mentioned
simultaneous molding or finishing is preferable, because the refractory material according
to the present invention composing the interior surface and/or the portions to come
into contact with molten steel is composed of spinel, or spinel and periclase, so
that it may have a greater expansion coefficient than that of the Al
2O
3-C or Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C refractory material composing the main body of the nozzle.
[0031] Similarly, the refractory material composing the main body of the nozzle and the
refractory material composing the interior surface and/or the portions to come into
contact with molten steel are preferably mixed with the same kind of binder as described
above to yield better affinity resulting in a stable adhesion
[0032] On the other hand, in the manufacture of the refractory material according to the
present invention, it is desirable to use as raw material a spinel raw material, or
a spinel raw material and a magnesia raw material comprising periclase. When magnesia
and alumina starting materials are used simultaneously as starting materials, magnesia
reacts with alumina during the firing or use of the refractory materials to form spinel.
However, the materials expand as the reaction progresses, and there is a risk that
the materials may cracks. Incidentally, spinel raw materials, in which the ratio of
MgO : Al
2O
3 composing spinel does not correspond to the theoretical composition and spinel and
periclase coexist with an excess of MgO, or in which corundum crystals as free alumina
are not found with an excess of Al
2O
3, can be used. Both spinel and magnesia raw materials may be used irrespective of
an electro-molten or fired product.
[0033] The grain size of the starting materials blended to form the refractory material
according to the present invention is preferably 1,000 µm or less, in which the ratio
of grains having a grain size of 500 µm or less is not less than 60% by weight. If
particles having a grain size exceeding 1,000 µm are present, the grain size of the
starting material in relation to the thickness of nozzle is too large, which will
cause the refractory structure to become brittle, and will cause grains to fall out,
etc., during use. Also, if the ratio of grains having a grain size of less than 500
µm or less is less than 60% by weight, the molding property is deteriorated, especially
in simultaneous molding, and a satisfactory molded product can seldom be obtained.
Incidentally, if the raw materials having a grain size of less than 0.5 µm exceeds
20% by weight, the resistance to spoiling of the refractory material is undesirably
deteriorated, resulting in cracking.
[0034] Further, when the refractory material of the present invention is used for the interior
surface of the nozzle and /or the portions that come into contact with molten steel,
the thickness thereof is preferably with the range of 2 to 10 mm. Refractory material
with a thickness of less than 2 mm, is weak and therefore not capable of withstanding
the impact of the stream of molten steel, resulting in a risk that the nozzle will
fall-out from the main body of the nozzle. Further, if the thickness exceeds 10 mm,
the difference in thermal expansion coefficient with the refractory material composing
the main body is large. Accordingly, there is a risk that cracking will result (deterioration
of spoiling resistance), which is not desirable.
Effect of the Invention
[0035] Using the nozzle according to the present invention, blockage of the nozzle due to
the adhesion of Al
2O
3 inclusions during the casting of aluminum killed steel casting can be remarkably
suppressed. Also, in the casting of high oxygen content steel, high manganese content
steel stainless steel and Ca-treated steel, damage of the nozzles is remarkably reduced.
Example
[0036] The tests of spalling resistance, Al
2O
3 inclusions adhesion resistance and melt-damaged resistance performed on each of the
samples in the examples and comparative examples below will now be explained.
[0037] In the spalling tests, samples 40 x 40 x 230 mm in dimension preheated at 800°C for
one hour were immersed for 5 minutes in 1,580°C of molten steel that was prepared
by dissolving 200 kg of steel in a high frequency furnace, and then pulled up to be
cooled in air. Samples after cooling were evaluated on the basis of crack formation.
Ten samples were prepared and were evaluated by the total number of samples in which
creaks had formed.
[0038] In the melt-damage tests, samples of 40 mm in diameter and 230 mm in height were
immersed in molten high oxygen content steel at 1,580°C in argon and rotated for 60
minutes at a speed of 100 rpm, then evaluated by the decrease in diameter of each
sample.
[0039] In the Al
2O
3 inclusions adhesion tests, samples of 40 mm in diameter and 230 mm in height were
immersed in molten aluminum killed steel at 1, 580°C in argon, rotated for 60 minutes
at a speed of 100 rpm, then evaluated based on the thickness of Al
2O
3 adhesion layer on the working surface of each sample.
Example 1
[0040] Two percent by weight (outer percentage) of phenol resin as binder were added to
the starting material blends shown in Table 1 below, blended, CIP molded under a pressure
of 1,000 kgf/cm
2, and then dried at 250°C for 3 hours to prepare samples. In this example, a spinel
raw material having a nearly theoretical composition, in which the weight ratio of
MgO : Al
2O
3 is 28 : 72, and a magnesia rich spinel raw material, in which the weight ratio of
MgO : Al
2O
3 is 50 : 50, were used.
[0041] The samples thus obtained were subjected to the spolling, melt-damage and Al
2O
3 adhesion tests described above. The results obtained are given in Table 1.
Table 1
|
|
INVENTIVE PRODUCT |
Comparative Product |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
BLEND (wt%) |
Magnesia (0.5-300 µm) |
85 |
60 |
20 |
10 |
- |
20 |
- |
80 |
- |
78 |
|
Magnesia (<0.5 µm) |
5 |
10 |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
- |
- |
|
Spinel of theoretical composition (500-1000 µm) |
3 |
- |
20 |
10 |
35 |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
|
Spinel of Theoretical Composition (0.5-500 µm) |
7 |
28 |
50 |
70 |
60 |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
- |
|
Spinel of Theoretical Composition (<0.5 µm) |
- |
2 |
|
10 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
MgO rich Spinel (500-1000 µm) |
- |
- |
|
|
|
30 |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
|
MgO rich Spinel (0.5-500 µm) |
- |
- |
|
|
|
40 |
80 |
- |
- |
- |
|
MgO rich spinel(<0.5 µm) |
- |
- |
|
|
|
10 |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Alumina (100-500 µm) |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
65 |
22 |
|
Chemical Composition (wt%) |
MgO |
93 |
78 |
50 |
35 |
28 |
60 |
50 |
100 |
10 |
78 |
- |
Al2O3 |
7 |
22 |
50 |
65 |
72 |
40 |
50 |
- |
90 |
22 |
41 |
SiO2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
28 |
C |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
31 |
Mineral Phase |
P.S |
P.S |
P.S |
P.S |
S |
P.S |
P.S |
P |
C.S |
P.C |
C.M |
Test Results |
Spalling resistance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
Melt-damage resistance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
10 |
Al2O3 inclusions Adhesion resistance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
[0042] In Table 1, symbols in the row of 'Mineral Phase' indicate the following: P; periclase,
S; spinel, C; corundum, and M; Mullite, respectively.
[0043] From the results shown in Table 1, the following can be ascertained:
1) Comparative Product 1, which had a composition of 100% by weight of MgO, and Comparative
Product 3, which had a composition of 78% by weight of MgO, 22% by weight of Al2O3, and had periclase and corundum as mineral phase, had poor spalling resistance, but
there were no such problems with any of the other samples.
2) Damage resistance was poorest in Comparative Product 4 (conventional Al2O3-SiO2-C refractory material), followed by Comparative Products 2 and 3, but there were
no such problems with any of the other samples.
3) Al2O3 inclusions adhesion was poor in Comparative Product 4, but Al2O3 adhesion layer was not observed in any of the other samples.
[0044] Consequently, in the nozzle of the present invention, the refractory material disposed
in the interior surface of the nozzle and/or the portions that come into contact with
molten steel can be seen to simultaneously provide spalling resistance, damage resistance,
and Al
2O
3 inclusions adhesion resistance.
Example 2
[0045] The blend of starting material shown in Table 2 below was used to prepare samples
by the same method as in Example 1, and spalling, damage, and Al
2O
3 inclusions adhesion tests were performed. The results obtained are given in Table
2.
Table 2
|
INVENTIVE PRODUCT |
Comparative Product |
|
|
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
5 |
6 |
BLEND (wt%) |
Magnesia (>1000 µm) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
Magnesia (0.5-300 µm) |
65 |
60 |
60 |
52 |
50 |
54 |
Magnesia (<0.5 µm) |
5 |
10 |
10 |
18 |
10 |
16 |
Spinel of Theoretical composition (>1000 µm) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
Spinel of Theoretical Composition (500-1000 µm) |
10 |
- |
5 |
15 |
23 |
14 |
Spinel of Theoretical Composition (0.5-500 µm) |
18 |
28 |
20 |
15 |
5 |
10 |
Spinel of Theoretical Composition (<0.5 µm) |
2 |
2 |
5 |
- |
- |
6 |
Chemical Composition (wt%) |
MgO |
78 |
78 |
78 |
78 |
78 |
78 |
Al2O3 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
Mineral Phase |
P.S |
P.S |
P.S |
P.S |
P.S |
P.S |
Test Results |
Spalling resistance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* |
4 |
Melt-damage resistance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* |
0 |
Al2O3 inclusions Adhesion resistance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
*The falling-out of coarse particles was detected. |
[0046] From the results shown in Table 2, the following can be ascertained.
1) When the maximum grain size of the starting material exceeds 1,000 µm, coarse particles
fall out of the surface of the samples.
2) When the ratio of starting materials of less than 0.5 µm is not more than 20% by
weight, the spalling resistance is barely affected, but when it exceeds 20% by weight,
the spalling resistance lowers remarkably.
3) The particle size has little effect on the resistance to melt-damage and the adhesion
of Al2O3 inclusions.
Example 3
[0047] Using a main body of the nozzle composed of the Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C refractory material of Comparative Product 4 shown in Table 1 above, nozzles (external
diameter of nozzle; 130 mm, internal diameter; 70 mm, length; 600 mm) with the interior
material of the nozzle of Inventive Product 1 shown in Table 1 above were prepared
while varying the thickness of the interior materials (1 mm, 2 mm, 5 mm, 8 mm, 10
mm, and 12 mm, but the thickness of the main body of the nozzle was constant). The
samples were simultaneously molded by CIP method, left for 24 hours, and then dried
at 105°C for 24 hours. The distribution pattern of the materials was as shown in Fig.
5.
[0048] The nozzle test samples thus obtained were immersed for 1 hour in 200 kg of molten
steel, which was melted at 1,580°C in a high frequency furnace, and then compared
for spalling resistance by crack formation. Ten test samples were prepared and the
spalling resistance was evaluated by the number of test samples, in which cracks were
formed. The test results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
|
Inventive Product |
Comparative Product |
|
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
7 |
8 |
Thickness of interior material (mm) |
2 |
5 |
8 |
10 |
1 |
12 |
Spalling resistance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* |
4 |
*The falling-out of interior material was detected. |
[0049] From Table 3, it became clear that the interior material may be in danger of falling-out
when the thickness of the interior surface is less than 2 mm, and that the spalling
resistance deteriorates markedly when the thickness exceeds 10 mm.
Example 4
[0050] An actual machine test run was performed to evaluate the effect of the nozzle according
to the present invention. The submerged nozzle of Inventive Product 13 shown in Table
3 as well as a conventional nozzle as comparison, which was made of the combination
of Al
2O
3-SiO
2-C refractory material of Comparative Product 4 of Table 1 and ZrO
2-C refractory material (80% by weight of CaO stabilized ZrO
2 and 20% by weight of graphite) with a distribution pattern of materials shown in
Fig. 6, were tested. The tests were performed at a casting temperature of 1,580°C
by using a low carbon aluminum killed steel (composition (wt%): C; 0.08, Si; 0.03,
Mn; 0.2, P; 0.01, Al; 0.05, and O; 10 ppm). After casting for 250 minutes, the thickness
of the maximum Al
2O
3 inclusions adhesion layer in the comparative nozzle was 15 mm, whereas it was only
3 mm in the nozzle of the present invention, showing a significant reduction effect
in the Al
2O
3 adhesion. Further, there was no cracking and falling-out of the interior material
of the nozzle, and safe operation could be carried out.
Example 5
[0051] The test was performed by using two submerged nozzles similar to those in Example
4 for continuous casting of high oxygen content steel (composition (wt%): C; 30 ppm,
Si; 20 ppm, Mn; 0.3, P; 0.01, S; 0.01, Al; 10 ppm, and O; 600 ppm). As a result of
testing, the maximum thickness damaged of the interior pipe after casting for 230
minutes in the comparative nozzle was 11 mm, whereas it was only 1 mm in the nozzle
of the present invention, showing a significant decrease in damage in the submerged
nozzle. In this case, too, there was no cracking and falling-out of the interior material
of the nozzle, and safe operation could be carried out.
Example 6
[0052] The test was performed by using two submerged nozzles similar to those in Example
4 for continuous casting of high manganese content steel (composition (wt%): C; 0.04,
Si; 0.02, Mn; 1.5, P; 0.01, S; 0.01, and O; 100 ppm). As a result of testing, the
maximum thickness damaged of the interior pipe after casting for 210 minutes in the
comparative nozzle was 13 mm, whereas it was only 1.5 mm in the nozzle of the present
invention, showing a significant decrease in damage in the submerged nozzle. In this
case, too, there was no cracking and falling-out of the interior material of the nozzle,
and safe operation could be carried out.
Example 7
[0053] The test was performed by using two submerged nozzles similar to those in Example
4 for continuous casting of stainless steel (composition (wt%): C; 0.05, Si; 0.5,
Mn; 1.0, P; 0.04, S; 0.02, Ni; 8.0, Cr; 18.0, and O; 50 ppm). As a result of testing,
the maximum thickness damaged of the interior pipe after casting for 260 minutes in
the comparative nozzle was 9 mm, whereas it was only 0.5 mm in the nozzle of the present
invention, showing a significant decrease in damage in the submerged nozzle. In this
case, too, there was no cracking and falling-out of the interior material of the nozzle,
and safe operation could be carried out.
Example 8
[0054] The test was performed by using two submerged nozzles similar to those in Example
4 for continuous casting of calcium treating steel (composition (wt%): C; 0.05, Si;
0.3, Mn; 0.8, P; 0.01, S; 0.01, Al; 0.02, Ca; 30 ppm, and O; 20 ppm). As a result
of testing, the maximum thickness damaged of the interior pipe after casting for 200
minutes in the comparative nozzle was 8 mm, whereas it was only 1 mm in the nozzle
of the present invention, showing a significant decrease in damage in the submerged
nozzle. In this case, too, there was no cracking and falling-out of the interior material
of the nozzle, and safe operation could be carried out.