[0001] The present invention concerns a vascular prosthesis and a method for its production.
[0002] Prostheses of this kind are formed, for example, from textiles, meshes or other porous
structures woven from PET, PTFE, or other biostable and biocompatible polymers. Porosity
is an essential requirement for these prostheses as it assists in the incorporation
of the prosthesis in the surrounding tissues and/or the newly formed tissues (the
pseudo-neointima) following implantation. However, this porosity, if not limited in
some way, would disadvantageously allow an undesirable movement of blood through the
walls of the prostheses.
[0003] In order to avoid this, the prosthesis is treated with the patient's blood before
implantation, so-called "pre-clotting", in order to render the prosthesis impermeable
by means of thrombotic deposits (principally fibrin) of autologous blood.
[0004] However, the "pre-clotting" treatment is very delicate, and its success depends upon
a number of factors that are not always easily controllable, such as the chemical
composition of the patient's blood in which the prosthesis is implanted, the possible
presence of drugs, the manner of execution of the procedure and the elapsed time between
the "pre-clotting" treatment itself and the implantation of the prosthesis. In any
case, there is always a risk of bacterial contamination associated with handling the
prosthesis and the blood.
[0005] In order to avoid these disadvantages, it has been proposed to impregnate the prosthesis
with a substance that makes it impermeable to blood, thus eliminating the need for
the "pre-clotting" treatment. This substance also acts as a temporary "scaffold" after
implantation, promoting cellular growth, the incorporation of the prosthesis in the
surrounding tissues and the "graft healing" process, becoming gradually reabsorbed
during the "healing" period and replaced by the host's tissue.
[0006] Examples of substances that have been proposed for prosthesis impregnation and which
have the aforesaid characteristics include collagen, which is the most common structural
protein in mammalian tissues, gelatine, which is the denatured form of collagen, and
albumin.
[0007] In practice, gelatine and, especially, collagen have been the substances utilised
until now for the impregnation of prostheses, while albumin has been little used because
of source limitations.
[0008] For example, US-A-4 842 575 describes a method for the impregnation of synthetic
vascular prostheses using, in particular, a PET such as Dacron (registered trade mark)
with an aqueous collagen slurry.
[0009] By virtue of the elasticity, resistance and the hydrophilic nature of the constituent
fibrils, this substance exhibits "in vivo" structural and coating functions, and has
good biocompatibility and absorbability. In fact, when it is extracted from mammalian
tissues and subjected to appropriate chemical treatment, it has a low antigenicity
(so that it is not recognised as a foreign body by the organism into which it is implanted)
and is therefore biodegraded in vivo, releasing sub-products that are metabolised
in normal biological exchange mechanisms similar to those that occur during "tissue
repair".
[0010] For the reasons described above, collagen is widely used as a prosthesis-impregnating
substance, although it also has a number of disadvantages.
[0011] In fact, collagen is very susceptible to bacterial attack and it is therefore necessary
to work under sterile conditions in order to minimise the formation of bacteria, as
this could lead to possible attack by bacterial proteases that could degrade the material,
as well as leading to difficulties in sterilising the finished product and the possible
pyrogenicity of the prostheses.
[0012] It is also difficult to obtain purified collagen having uniform characteristics because
of the different ages of the animals from which it is extracted and the complexity
of the purification process which is, in any case, very expensive. Therefore, due
to the inhomogeneity of the starting product, problems can arise during the impregnation
treatment, which is not always perfectly reproducible and repeatable.
[0013] Furthermore, there is a risk that the collagen will be extracted in Europe from animal
tissues contaminated by slow viruses, for example, BSE.
[0014] Finally, collagen can be denatured at temperatures above 40°C. Therefore, the manners
in which it is handled and transported must be strictly controlled in order to avoid
exceeding this threshold temperature.
[0015] The object of the present invention is to overcome the disadvantages described above
in relation to the known techniques for making vascular prostheses impermeable.
[0016] This object is achieved in the form of a coated vascular prosthesis as defined specifically
in the following claims which also refer to the associated methods of production.
[0017] The invention is further illustrated in the accompanying drawings, given by way of
non-limitative example, in which:
Figure 1 illustrates the variation in the glass transition and melting temperatures
of poly-(lactide-caprolactone) (DLLA-CL) copolymers as a function of the percentage
of caprolactone;
Figure 2 illustrates the variation in the maximum load of CL-DLLA copolymers as a
function of the percentage of caprolactone;
Figure 3 illustrates the variation in the coefficient of elasticity of CL-DLLA copolymers
as a function of the percentage of caprolactone;
Figure 4 illustrates the variation in a time degradation constant of CL-DLLA copolymers
as a function of the percentage of caprolactone; and
Figure 5 is a SEM photographic representation of a polymer layer according to the
invention applied to a prosthesis body made from Dacron (registered trade mark).
[0018] Since, in the prostheses of the invention, the impermeable coating layer is made
from a synthetic polymer, the risk of possible contamination by pathogenic agents
is avoided, as are the problems of reproducibility related to the use of materials
of natural origin.
[0019] These synthetic polymers are also biodegradable and biocompatible (this also includes
the products of degradation) and, as they are preferably hydrophobic and anhydrous,
they demonstrate good properties of adhesion to the prosthesis body.
[0020] Since these polymers have good elastic properties and do not penetrate deeply into
the prosthesis body, the constituent fibres of the prosthesis maintain their original
flexibility and softness which means that their suturability and the possibilities
for handling the coated prosthesis are more than satisfactory.
[0021] According to the invention, the impermeable coating can be applied to the outer surface
of the prosthesis, to its inner surface, or to both surfaces using conventional application
techniques which are reproducible, controllable and inexpensive. These techniques
can, for example, be based on coating operations, possibly performed in several stages,
or rolling, possibly at high temperatures, and/or a combination thereof and possibly
followed by or alternated with heat treatments.
[0022] Furthermore, different techniques can be used to apply the impermeable layer to areas
of a single prosthesis having different geometries, for example, the straight portions
and any branching areas that may be present.
[0023] Advantageously, the impermeable coating of the prosthesis body is between 50 and
300 µm thick.
[0024] Polymers that can be used to form the impermeable coating according to the invention
are, for example, the poly(lactide-caprolactone) copolymers having an intrinsic viscosity
[η], measured in chloroform at 25°C, of less than 4 dl/g, preferably between 0.5 and
4 dl/g, and more preferably equal to 2 dl/g. These values indicate a molecular weight
of at least 40,000 Dalton.
[0025] Advantageously, these copolymers are obtained from D,L-lactide and ε-caprolactone
in a weight ratio of between 40%/ 60% and 60%/40% and, preferably, equal to 50%/50%.
[0026] These copolymers are amorphous, having a glass transition temperature of between
0° and -30°C, a coefficient of elasticity less than 10 MPa, and an elastic breaking
strain greater than 100%. These properties are such that a coating formed from these
copolymers, once applied to a prosthesis body, has optimal characteristics of impermeability,
elasticity and speed of degradation, which make it suitable for use on an implanted
prosthesis.
[0027] This result is surprising when one considers the fact that the homopolymers both
of D, L-lactide and ε-caprolactone are rigid and degrade very slowly. However, it
must be taken into account that these properties arise from very different characteristics
and from certain opposite standpoints.
[0028] Poly-caprolactone is, in fact, a polymer having a high degree of crystallinity, with
a melting point T
m of approximately +60°C, and a low glass transition temperature T
g (approximately -60°C). The high degree of crystallinity (structural order) further
confers rigidity and limits the quantity of water that can be absorbed by the material
and the velocity at which it can defuse therein and, consequently, it slows down the
hydrolysis responsible for the biodegradation.
[0029] On the other hand, poly-D,L-lactide is an amorphous polymer, but has a T
g of +49°C. Therefore, at ambient temperature and at the temperature of use (+37°C),
it is at a temperature less than the T
g and, therefore, exists in a rigid "glassy" state with reduced molecular mobility.
[0030] By combining the two monomers in variable percentages to form the copolymer (see
Figure 1), it is possible to identify a composition interval (corresponding to a percentage
of caprolactone of between approximately 40% and 60%) in which the degree of crystallinity
is extremely low or nil and which, at the same time, exhibits a T
g that is still significantly less than ambient temperature. Because of this, the resulting
copolymer is elastic.
[0031] These characteristics are illustrated in Figures 2, 3 and 4, which show - as a function
of the variation in composition of CL-DLLA copolymers - the respective variations
of the maximum load, the coefficient of elasticity and a time degradation constant,
defined as the inverse of the quantity Kxα, in which:
α is the exponent of the Mark-Houwing equation

which describes the correlation between the intrinsic viscosity and the molecular
weight of a polymer (M
w); K is the gradient of the straight line which, on a logarithmic scale, describes
the decrease of η over time due to the hydrolysis in polymers kept in water or aqueous
solution.
[0032] Other examples of polymers which can be used according to the invention to form an
impermeable coating on a prosthesis are provided by the aliphatic polyesters. Homopolymers
or copolymers of polyvalerolactone, ε-decalactone, polyhydroxybutyrate, polyhydroxyvalerate,
polydioxanone, can be added as plasticisers.
[0033] These plasticisers can be, for example, monomers or oligomers of the same aliphatic
polyesters, as well as lecithin, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), esters of citric acid,
esters of trimellitic acid and glycerololigolactides. The same plasticisers can also
be added to the ε-CL/DLLA copolymers described above.
[0034] Further advantages and characteristics of the present invention will become clear
from the following examples of methods for producing coated prostheses, given by way
of non-limitative example.
EXAMPLE 1
[0035] A copolymer of D,L-lactide and ε-caprolactone is prepared with a weight ratio between
the components of 50% / 50%, and an intrinsic viscosity [η], measured in chloroform
at 25°C, equal to 2 dl/g, according to methods described, for example, in:
M. Hiljanen-Vainio et al. "Biodegradable lactone copolymers. I. Characterisation and
mechanical behaviour of ε-Caprolactone and Lactide Copolymers", J. of Applied Polymer
Science (1996), 59; 1281-1288;
X. Zhang et al., "An investigation of the synthesis and thermal stability of poly(D;L-lactide)",
J.Polym. SCI. Polym. Chem. (1994), 32: 2965-2970;
D. W. Grijpma et al., "Polimerization temperature effects on the properties of L-lactide
and ε-caprolactone copolymers", Polymer Bulletin (1991), 25: 335-341;
M. P. Hiljanen-Vainio et al., "Properties of ε-caprolactone/DL-lactide (ε-CL/DLLA)
copolymers with a minor ε-CL content", J. Biomed. Mat. Res. (1997), 34: 39-46.
[0036] A 5% solution of the copolymer in acetone, 2-butanone, dimethylacetamide or mixtures
thereof is then prepared. The solution is then placed in an evaporator made from an
anti-adhesive material such as PTFE, and within a mould in order to obtain, after
the evaporation of the solvent, a copolymer sheet having a shape corresponding to
that of the mould, for example, rectangular or lozenge shape.
[0037] The sheet thus obtained is then put on a slab of polished anti-adhesive material,
on which a template of anti-adhesive material is placed, which template reproduces
the geometry of the copolymer film intended to be deposited on the body of a prosthesis
made from PET Dacron (registered trade mark). The template acts as a reference for
cutting a film from the sheet having dimensions suitable for covering the prosthesis
surface.
[0038] The prosthesis body and the cut copolymer film are then mounted on respective mandrels
of a machine having counter-rotating rollers. The mandrel on which the film is mounted
is advantageously formed from an anti-adhesive material and is heated and, during
the operation of the machine, is in pressure contact with the other mandrel. Rolling
is therefore achieved which, due to the combined action of heat and pressure, causes
the copolymer film to adhere to and partly penetrate the body of the prosthesis.
[0039] Advantageously, there is an overlap between adjacent edges of film in order to obtain
a continuous impermeable coating on the prosthesis body. Greater pressure is exerted
in the overlapping zones than in the non-overlapping zones in order to obtain a layer
of uniform thickness.
[0040] The coated prosthesis obtained in this way is then placed in an oven for approximately
one hour at a temperature of 85°C in order to improve the regularity of the coating
layer and its adhesion to the prosthesis body.
[0041] The characteristics of the coating have been verified using the following tests:
I) Tests for verifying the impermeability of the coated prostheses, carried out with
both water and air.
In the first case, complete prostheses (closed on one side) and circular samples of
the same material were subjected to the action of a column of water - of such a height
as to exert a pressure analogous to physiological pressure (16 kPa) - and any losses
measured.
In the second case, a fluid circuit was blocked with discs of the material under examination,
pressurised, and any decrease in the pressure caused by leakage of air across the
material forming the discs was then measured.
II) Tests after stressing, carried out as in I), but utilising circular samples previously
subjected, three times, to separation stresses and laceration of the coating. These
stresses were caused by causing the coated side of the samples to adhere under pressure
to a smooth polycarbonate surface and then detaching them therefrom by means of a
pulling action reproducibly exerted by an elastic means.
[0042] Since, in some cases, vascular prostheses made from polyethyleneterephthalate are
coated with thin films of turbostatic carbon, known as "Carbofilm", in order to improve
their biocompatibility, and since this treatment, by reducing the hydrophobicity of
the surface, could reduce the adhesion of the hydrophobic, biodegradable polymer to
the prosthesis body, the adhesion of copolymer films to Carbofilm-coated surfaces
was also tested.
[0043] To this end, the sheets are caused to adhere to these surfaces by exerting pressure
and thermal treatment for one hour at 85° C. The polymer of the sheet is then incised
to form a network of incisions, following which a strip of adhesive tape is then adhered
(under pressure) to this sheet and then detached therefrom by pulling. Whether or
not total or partial separation of the copolymer sheet from the Carbofilm-coated surface
occurred, and the extent of such separation, provides a good indicator of the adhesion
between the sheet and the coated surface.
[0044] The tests demonstrated that the copolymer coating provides the prostheses with an
impermeability equal to or greater than that of analogous collagen-impregnated prostheses
currently in clinical use, that this impermeability remains even after the exertion
of forces to separate the copolymer from the textile (or mesh), and that the adhesion
between the copolymer sheet and the Carbofilm-coated surface is adequate, in that
no separation was observed following the test described.
EXAMPLE 2
[0045] This example is similar to the above example with the difference that the polymer
sheet of desired thickness made from D,L-lactide and ε-caprolactone copolymers is
produced thermo-mechanically. To this end, a suitable quantity of copolymer is inserted
in a cavity of desired depth and shape in a mould fitted in a press provided with
plates of heated anti-adhesive material. The combined action of heat and pressure
causes the excess copolymer to melt and this excess is discharged through apertures
formed in the mould. A copolymer sheet of the desired thickness is thus obtained,
a portion of which is then applied to a prosthesis body in a manner similar to that
described above.
[0046] In this case also, the tests described in Example 1 are performed, obtaining results
entirely analogous thereto.
EXAMPLE 3
[0047] A solution of between 2% and 5% concentration of D,L-lactide copolymer and ε-caprolactone
in a solvent such as, for example, acetone, 2-butanone, dimethyleacetamide or mixtures
thereof is prepared. An inert propellant is then added to this solution which is sprayed,
using known spraying techniques, onto a prosthesis body mounted on a rotating mandrel.
The drops striking the surface of this body still contain a good part of the solvent
and can therefore coalesce with each other to form a homogenous and continuous layer
that does not, however, adhere perfectly to the surface of the prosthesis body, but
traces the geometry and adheres partly thereto.
[0048] In order to obtain perfect adhesion, the prosthesis coated with this imperfectly
adhered layer is mounted on a mandrel of a machine having counter-rotating rollers.
During the operation of the machine, this mandrel, which acts as a first roller, comes
into pressure contact with a second, counter-rotating roller made of heated anti-adhesive
material, to obtain the perfect adhesion of the copolymer layer to the prosthesis
body due to the combined action of heat and pressure.
[0049] The thickness of the coating layer can be increased by spraying further coats of
the copolymer solution.
[0050] The coated prosthesis thus obtained is then placed in an oven for approximately four
hours at a temperature of 55°C in order to improve the regularity and homogeneity
of the coating layer (see Figure 5).
[0051] Tests, including tests following stressing, were then performed on the coated prosthesis
as described in Example 1, obtaining confirmation, in this case also, of its good
impermeability.
EXAMPLE 4
[0052] This is similar to Example 3 with the differences that a less volatile solvent (or
solvent mixture) such as 2-butanone is used, and that the prosthesis body is preliminarily
impregnated using the same solvent. By virtue of these measures, the first layer deposited
by means of spraying adheres to and partly penetrates the prosthesis body. It is not
therefore necessary to perform the hot rolling stage in this case. Instead, one proceeds
directly to a thermal stabilisation treatment at 55°C for 90 minutes and, finally,
to spraying successive layers until the desired thickness of approximately 150 mm
is reached.
[0053] Tests, also following stressing - as described in Example 1 - are then performed,
which have confirmed, in this case also, its good impermeability.
[0054] Naturally, with the principle of the invention remaining the same, the details of
construction and the embodiments can be widely varied with respect to that described
purely by way of example, without by this departing from the ambit of the invention.
1. A vascular prosthesis having a body made from biostable and biocompatible polymeric
material, characterised in that at least a surface portion thereof is coated with
at least one impermeable layer based on a synthetic, biodegradable and biocompatible
polymer having a coefficient of elasticity less than 10 MPa.
2. A prosthesis according to Claim 1, characterised in that the said polymer is hydrophobic
and anhydrous.
3. A prosthesis according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, characterised in that the said polymer
is a poly-(lactide-caprolactone) copolymer having an intrinsic viscosity [η], measured
in chloroform at 25°C, of less than 4 dl/g.
4. A prosthesis according to Claim 3, characterised in that the said copolymer is obtained
from D,L-lactide and ε-caprolactone in a weight ratio of between 40%/60% and 60%/40%.
5. A prosthesis according to Claim 4, characterised in that the said weight ratio is
equal to 50%/50%.
6. A prosthesis according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, characterised in that the said polymer
is a homopolymer or copolymer of polyvalerolactone, ε-decalactone, polyhydroxybutyrate,
polyhydroxyvalerate or polydioxanone.
7. A prosthesis according to Claim 6, characterised in that the said polymer is supplemented
by monomers or oligomers of the same polymer, lecithin, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP),
esters of citric acid, esters of trimellitic acid and/or glycerololigolactides.
8. A prosthesis according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the said at least
one impermeable layer is between 50 and 300 µm thick.
9. A method for the production of a prosthesis according to any preceding claim, characterised
in that the said at least one impermeable layer is applied to the said body using
coating techniques, in particular, spraying.
10. A method for the production of a prosthesis according to any of Claims from 1 to 8,
characterised in that the said at least one impermeable layer is applied to the body
using rolling techniques.
11. A method according to Claim 9 or Claim 10, characterised in that the said application
is effected at temperatures higher than room temperature.
12. A method according to any of Claims from 9 to 11, characterised in that the said application
is followed by a heat treatment.
13. A method according to any of Claims from 9 to 12, characterised in that it provides
for the combination or successive utilisation of coating and rolling techniques for
applying the said at least one impermeable layer.
14. A method according to any of Claims from 9 to 13, characterised in that it provides
for the utilisation of various techniques for the application of the at least one
impermeable layer on areas of a single prosthesis having different geometries.