Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to fiber production and fiber treatment that renders
fiber soil resistant, oil repellent, and/or water repellent.
Background of the Invention
[0002] In the formation of textile materials from extruded thermoplastic polymers, such
as polypropylene, application of a spin oil to the filaments is standard practice.
Spin finish including a spin oil is a lubricating composition deposited on the surface
of the fiber to reduce the fiber-fiber friction and the friction developed as the
yarn passes over the metal machinery surfaces. Spin oil typically contains a large
number of chemical components, the major components being lubricant, antistatic agent
and emulsifier. The amount of spin finish needed depends on the producer and manufacturing
process, and typically the residual spin finish on the fiber varies between 0.7% and
5%. A major disadvantage of the use of a spin finish that includes a spin oil is that
residues of the finish on the extruded fiber attract soil. It also decreases the efficiency
of any protective treatment applied to the fiber and as such reduces the soil resistance
of the finished products.
[0003] In the industrial production of textiles, such as carpet and apparel, it is common
to treat such substrates with a composition to impart added desirable properties thereto,
such as resistance to soiling by particulate or dry soil. Fluorochemical compositions
are commercially used for this purpose. They can be applied to various substrates
by methods which include, for example, spraying, foaming, padding, and finish bath
immersion.
[0004] U.S. Patent No. 4,264,484 discloses a liquid carpet treating composition containing
a water-insoluble addition polymer that is derived from polymerizable ethylenically
unsaturated monomer that is free of non-vinylic fluorine and has at least one major
transition temperature higher than 25°C, and a water-insoluble fluoroaliphatic radical-
and aliphatic chlorine-containing ester having at least one major transition temperature
higher than 25°C.
[0005] U.S. Patent No. 4,107,055 discloses a fabric coating composition, including a polymer
having a glass transition temperature above room temperature, an ionic fluorinated
surfactant and a carrier. The polymer is preferably applied to fabric at a rate giving
a dry solids content of 0.25 to 10%, to give dry soil resistance.
[0006] U.S. Patent No. 4,043,964 discloses a coating which provides a durably soil-resistant
carpet and which contains: (a) at least one phase of a specified, water-insoluble
addition polymer derived from a polymerizable ethylenically unsaturated monomer that
is free of non-vinylic fluorine, and (b) at least one phase of a specified, water-insoluble
fluorinated component containing a fluoroaliphatic radical of at least 3 carbon atoms.
The monomer from which the fluorinated component is formed may contain dicarboxylic
acid, glycol, diamine, and hydroxyamine.
[0007] A common feature of the treating or coating compositions disclosed in the above-mentioned
U.S. patents is that they are to be applied to the carpet or fabric after its production
in a separate treating step. The application equipment and time required for such
a treating step adds to the cost of the final product.
[0008] Textile fibers and yarns can also be treated by incorporation of a fluorochemical
repellent treating agent in the spin finishing bath, for example, as disclosed in
U.S. Patent Nos. 4,190,545 and 4,192,754. A drawback of such a process is the formation
of deposits on the rolls caused by sedimentation of the fluorochemical oil- and water-repellent
agent/spin finish mixture. The deposit on the rolls can cause fiber breaks and must
be removed frequently. This is time consuming and expensive and is no longer accepted
as an application method by fiber manufacturers. Typically, the more spin finish added
to the fluorochemical treating agent, the more roll build up occurs, and the greater
the reduction in repellent properties of the finished product because of the high
level of spin oil present on the treated substrate.
[0009] Alternatively, treated textile fibers and yarns can be obtained by melt extrusion
of a blend of a synthetic fiber-forming polymer and a fluorochemical composition.
Such melt extrusion is described for example in U.S. Patent No. 3,839,312. This patent
discloses that soil and stain repellency of extruded filaments of a synthetic resin
can be improved by incorporating in the resin a small amount, 1 percent, of an amphipathic
compound having from one to four fluoroalkyl groups pendent from an organic radical.
The repellency is provided by the fluoroalkyl groups, which tend to be concentrated
at the surface of the fiber.
[0010] WO 92/18569 and WO 95/01396 disclose permanently soil resistant polymeric compositions
such as fibers and yarns that have a fluorochemical dispersed throughout the polymer.
These polymer compositions are prepared by melt extrusion of the fluorochemical with
the desired polymer. Polymers that can be used with the fluorochemical include polyester,
polypropylene, polyethylene and polyamide.
[0011] U.S. Patent No. 5,025,052 discloses certain fluoroaliphatic group-containing oxazolidinone
compositions. The patent also discloses fibers, films, and molded articles prepared,
for example, by injection molding a blend or mixture of fiber-or film-forming synthetic
organic polymers and certain fluorochemical oxazolidinones. The resulting fibers,
films, and molded articles are said to have low surface energy, oil and water repellency,
and anti-soiling properties.
[0012] European Pat. Pub. No. 0 516 271 discloses durably hydrophilic thermoplastic fibers
comprising thermoplastic polymer and fluoroaliphatic group-containing non-ionic compounds.
[0013] While the above-mentioned publications, U.S. Patent No. 3,839,312, WO 92/18569 and
WO 95/01396, are successful in providing soil and stain repellency to a yarn or fiber
and many currently used fluorochemical compositions have demonstrated utility in providing
carpet with soil resistance, unfortunately a significant amount of the carpet or fabric
manufactured cannot be treated to obtain the desired properties. The reason is that
significant and varying amounts of spin oil often remain on the fiber or yarn, lowering
the soiling resistance thereof or acting as contaminants which interfere with the
fluorochemical treatment and diminish or prevent the desired result thereof.
[0014] WO 97/33019 discloses a carpet yarn that contains a hydrophilicity imparting compound
dispersed in the filaments of thermoplastic polymer. Fluorochemical hydrophilicity
imparting compounds are disclosed as preferred hydrophilicity imparting compounds.
It is taught that as a result of the use of the hydrophilicity imparting compound
in the filaments of the yarn, less or no spin oil is needed in the spin finishing
bath and as a result, the carpet is less prone to soiling. Although this method is
successful, the oil and/or water repellency properties of the obtained fibers is generally
poor and there continues to be a desire to improve the soil repellency properties.
[0015] WO97/44508 discloses durably hydrophilic, thermoplastic fiber comprising a thermoplastic
polymer, such as polyamide, polyurethane, or polyolefin, e.g. polypropylene, and a
mixture of: (a) one or more fluoroaliphatic group-containing nonionic surfactants
and (b) one or more nonionic. non-fluorinated, polyoxyethylene group-containing surfactants
that contain between 20 and 80 weight percent polyoxyethylene.
Summary of the Invention
[0016] In one aspect, the invention provides a process for obtaining a fiber comprising
the steps of:
melt extruding a mixture of thermoplastic polymer and hydrophilicity imparting compound
to form a plurality of filaments;
applying a spin finish to said filaments;
and spinning said filaments into a fiber.
wherein said spin finish comprises fluorochemical. In preferred embodiments, the
fluorochemical is an effective oil and/or water repellent and it imparts good oil
and water repellency properties to the fiber.
[0017] One advantage of the invention is that roll build-up does not occur on the fibers
made according to the process even though the application of spin finishes comprising
fluorochemical to thermoplastic fibers typically results in roll build-up. Also, the
resulting fibers generally show good oil and water repellency properties and soil
resistance. Additionally, low levels of spin oil can be employed on fibers made according
to the invention without sacrificing their antistatic properties.
[0018] In another aspect, the invention provides a fiber containing a plurality of filaments
of a thermoplastic polymer having dispersed therein hydrophilicity imparting compound
characterized in that the filaments comprise on at least part of their surface fluorochemical.
As previously noted, the fluorochemical preferably is an effective oil and/or water
repellent treatment and it imports good oil and water repellency properties to the
fiber. In yet another aspect, the invention provides a carpet or textile comprising
such fibers.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0019] Thermoplastic polymers useful in the invention include fiber-forming poly(alpha)olefins,
polyesters and polyamides. Preferred thermoplastic polymers are poly (alpha)olefins.
Poly(alpha)olefins useful in the invention can include the normally solid, homo-,
co- and terpolymers of aliphatic mono-1-olefins (alpha olefins) as they are generally
recognized in the art. Usually, the monomers employed in making such poly(alpha)olefins
contain 2 to 10 carbon atoms per molecule, although higher molecular weight monomers
sometimes are used as comonomers. Blends of the polymers and copolymers prepared mechanically
or
in situ may also be used. Examples of monomers that can be employed in the invention include
ethylene, propylene, butene-1, pentane-1, 4-methyl-pentene-1, hexene-1, and octene-1,
alone, or in admixture, or in sequential polymerization systems.
[0020] Examples of preferred thermoplastic poly(alpha)olefin polymers include polyethylene,
polypropylene, propylene/ethylene copolymers, polybutylene and blends thereof. Polypropylene
is particularly preferred for use in the invention.
[0021] Processes for preparing the thermoplastic polymers useful in this invention are well
known, and the invention is not limited to a polymer made with a particular catalyst
or process.
[0022] Hydrophilicity imparting compounds useful in this invention may be fluorochemical
or non-fluorochemical, mixtures of such compounds or mixtures of fluorochemical compounds
and non-fluorochemical compounds. Non-fluorochemical hydrophilicity imparting compounds
are substantially free of fluorine (preferably containing less than 10 % by weight
and more preferably less than 5% by weight of fluorine) and are generally hydrophilic
in nature or contain at least a sufficient number of hydrophilic moieties such that
hydrophilicity or wettability is provided to the surface of the thermoplastic polymer
filaments. Included are low molecular weight compounds, oligomers and polymers. Suitable
non-fluorochemical hydrophilicity imparting compounds are preferably incompatible
with the thermoplastic polymer melt and are preferably stable at the required extrusion
temperatures.
[0023] Suitable non-fluorochemical hydrophilicity imparting compounds can be anionic, cationic,
non-ionic or amphoteric. Preferred compounds include compounds which are known to
have utility as surfactants. Particularly preferred non-fluorochemical hydrophilicity
imparting compounds are those that contain at least one poly(oxyalkylene) group.
[0024] Fluorochemical hydrophilicity imparting compounds useful in the invention are hydrophilic
in nature and can include compounds, oligomers, and polymers. Such materials will
contain at least 10% by weight of fluorine (i.e., carbon-bonded fluorine). They contain
one or more fluorochemical radicals (R
f), and one or more water solubilizing polar groups (Z), which radicals and groups
are usually connected together by suitable linking groups (Q).
[0025] The fluorochemical radical, R
f, in the fluorochemical hydrophilicity imparting compound can be generally described
as a fluorinated, preferably saturated, monovalent radical of at least 4 carbon atoms.
Preferably the fluorochemical radical is a fluoroaliphatic, non-aromatic radical.
The aliphatic chain may be straight, branched, or, if sufficiently large, cyclic,
and it may include oxygen, di- or hexavalent sulfur, or trivalent nitrogen atoms bonded
only to carbon atoms. A fully fluorinated radical is preferred, but hydrogen or chlorine
atoms may be present as substituents provided that no more than one atom of either
is present for every two carbon atoms. Fluoroaliphatic radicals containing 5 to 12
carbon atoms are most preferred.
[0026] The water solubilizing polar group or moiety, Z, of fluorochemical hydrophilicity
imparting compound can be a non-ionic, anionic, cationic, or amphoteric moiety, or
combinations of said groups or moieties which may be the same or different. Preferably,
the water solubilizing group comprises a poly(oxyalkylene) group, (OR')x, where R'
is an alkylene group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, such as -CH
2CH
2-, -CH
2CH
2CH
2-, -CH(CH
3)CH
2-, and -CH(CH
3)CH(CH
3)- or mixtures thereof, and x is an integer from 6 to 20. The oxyalkylene units in
said poly(oxyalkylene) may be the same, as in poly(oxypropylene), or present as a
mixture, such as in a heteric, straight or branched chain of randomly distributed
oxyethylene and oxypropylene units (e.g., poly(oxyethylene-co-oxypropylene), or as
in a straight or branched chain of blocks of oxyethylene units and blocks of oxypropylene
units. The poly(oxyalkylene) chain can be interrupted by or include one or more catenary
linkages, providing such linkages do not substantially alter the water-solubilizing
character of the poly(oxyalkylene) chain. The Z group is terminated with hydroxyl
or lower alkyl ether for example, -OCH
3 or -OCH
2CH
3. Typical anionic groups include CO
2H, CO
2M, SO
3H, SO
3M, OSO
3H, OSO
3M, OPO(OH)
2, and OPO(OM)
2, where M is a metallic ion (such as sodium or potassium), or ammonium ion, or other
amine cation. Typical cationic groups include NR
3+A
-, where R is a lower alkyl group such as methyl, ethyl, butyl, hydroxyethyl or hydrogen
and A is an anion such as chloride, sulfate, phosphate, hydroxide or iodide. Typical
mixed or amphoteric groups would include N
+(CH
3)
2C
2H
4COO
-, N
+(CH
3)
2C
3H
6SO
3- or an amine-oxide.
[0027] The linking group, Q, is a multivalent, generally divalent, linking group such as
alkylene, arylene, sulfonamidoalkylene, carbonamidoalkylene, and other heteroatom-containing
groups such as siloxane, including combinations of such groups. In some instances,
more than one fluoroaliphatic radical may be attached to a single linking group. In
other instances, a single fluoroaliphatic radical may be linked by a single linking
group to more than one polar solubilizing group. Q can also be a covalent bond.
[0028] A particularly useful class of fluorochemical hydrophilicity imparting compounds
are represented by the formula
R
f-Q-Z
where R
f is said fluoroaliphatic radical such as a fluorinated, monovalent residue having
at least 4 carbon atoms, Q is said linking group or covalent bond and Z is said water
solubilizing group.
[0029] Hydrophilicity imparting fluorochemical non-ionic compounds useful in the present
invention can be prepared using known methods such as those described in U.S. Patent
No. 2,915,554 (Albrecht et al.). The Albrecht patent discloses the preparation of
fluoroaliphatic group-containing, non-ionic compounds from active hydrogen containing
fluorochemical intermediates, such as fluoroaliphatic alcohols, e.g. R
fC
2H
4OH, acids e.g., R
fSO
2N(R")CH
2COOH, and sulfonamides, e.g., R
fSO
2N(R")H, by reaction of the intermediates with, for example, ethylene oxide to yield,
respectively, R
fC
2H
4O(C
2H
4O)
nH, R
fSO
2N(R")CH
2CO
2(C
2H
4O)
nH, and R
fSO
2N(R")(C
2H
4O)
nH, where n is a number greater than about 3, and R" is hydrogen or lower alkyl (e.g.,
1 to about 6 carbons). Analogous compounds can be prepared by treating the intermediates
with propylene oxide or a mixture of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide. See also
the fluoroaliphatic oligomers disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,787,351 (Olson), and
certain fluorinated alcohol-ethylene oxide condensates described in U.S. Patent No.
2,723,999 (Cowen et al.).
[0030] The hydrophilicity imparting compound is typically added in amounts between 0.05
and 5% by weight, preferably between 0.5 and 1.5% by weight, based on the total weight
of thermoplastic polymer.
[0031] Some examples of hydrophilicity imparting compounds include:
C
8F
17SO
2N(C
2H
5)CH
2CH
2O(CH
2CH
2O)
7CH
3
2 C
8F
17SO
3H
Jeffamine™ ED-600 di-salt (Jeffamine™ ED 600 is an amino terminated ethylene oxide-propylene
oxide polymer)
copolymers of fluorochemical acrylates or methacrylates
mono-acrylate or mono-methacrylates of polyethyleneoxide
C
8H
17SO
2N(C
2H
5)(CH
2CH
2O)
2-(CH(CH
3)CH
2O)
6H
polyethylene oxide
copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide
ethoxylated alkyl phenols (such as Triton™ X-100, available from Union Carbide, Danbury,
Connecticut)
[0032] A fiber or yarn can be produced in accordance with the invention by providing a mixture
comprising thermoplastic polymer and one or more hydrophilicity imparting compounds.
This mixture can be extruded to form filaments which are then preferably cooled. The
bundle of filaments is then typically treated in a spin finish bath. After receiving
the spin finish treatment, the filaments are generally stretched. Stretching may be
accomplished over a number of rolls that are at elevated temperature sufficient to
soften the thermoplastic polymer. By rotating the rolls at different speeds, stretching
of the filaments can be obtained. While stretching can be accomplished in one step,
it may be desirable to stretch the filaments in two steps. Typically, the filaments
will be stretched 3 to 4 times the extruded length. Subsequent to stretching, and
in order to obtain a carpet yarn, it will often be desirable to texture the yarn with
pressured air at an elevated temperature or steam jet and to subject it to an entanglement.
[0033] In accordance with the present invention, the spin finish comprises fluorochemical.
Preferably, such fluorochemical is an effective oil and/or water repellent. Typically,
the amount of fluorochemical in the spin finish will be between 0.1% by weight and
5% by weight, preferably between 0.5% by weight and 3% by weight. In general, the
fluorochemicals useful in the invention include any of the known fluoroaliphatic radical-containing
agents useful for the treatment of fabrics to obtain oil and water repellency. Fluorochemical
radical-containing agents such as condensation polymers like polyesters, polyamides
or polyepoxides, and vinyl polymers like polyacrylates, polymethacrylates or polyvinyl
ethers are generally effective choices. Such known agents include, for example, those
described in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,546,187, 3,544,537, 3,470,124, 3,445,491, 3,341,497
and 3,420,697.
[0034] Further examples of useful fluoroaliphatic radical-containing water and oil repellency
imparting agents include those formed by the reaction of perfluoroaliphatic glycols
or thioglycols with diisocyanates to provide perfluoroaliphatic group-containing polyurethanes.
These products are normally applied to fibers as aqueous dispersions. Such reaction
products are described, for example, in U.S. Patent No. 4,054,592. Another group of
useful fluorochemicals are fluoroaliphatic radical-containing, N-methylol condensation
products. These compounds are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,477,498. Other examples
of useful fluorochemicals include fluoroaliphatic radical containing polycarbodiimides
which can be obtained, for example, by reaction of perfluoroaliphatic sulfonamido
alkanols with polyisocyanates in the presence of suitable catalysts.
[0035] The fluorochemical can be a copolymer of one or more fluoroaliphatic radical-containing
acrylate or methacrylate monomers, and one or more fluorine-free (or hydrocarbon)
terminally ethylenically-unsaturated comonomers. Representative examples of such fluorochemical
monomers include:
CF
3(CF
2)
4CH
2OC(O)C(CH
3)=CH
2
CF
3(CF
2)
6(CH
2)
2OC(O)C(CH
3)=CH
2
CF
3(CF
2)
6(CH
2)
2OC(O)CH=CH
2
CF
3(CF
2)
7(CH
2)
2OC(O)CH=CH
2
CF
3CF
2(CF
2CF
2)
2-8CH
2CH
2OC(O)CH=CH
2

[0036] The preferred monomers to copolymerize with the above-described fluoroaliphatic radical-containing
monomers include those selected from the group consisting of octadecylmethacryate,
1,4-butanediol diacrylate, laurylmethacrylate, butylacrytate, N-methylol acrylamide,
isobutylmethacrylate, ethylhexyl acrylate, ethylhexyl methacrylate, vinylchloride
and vinylidene chloride. The relative weight ratio of the fluoroaliphatic monomer(s)
to the hydrocarbon co-monomer(s) can vary and is taught in the art.
[0037] Further examples of useful fluorochemicals include, for example, fluorinated group
containing urethanes, ureas, esters, amines (and salts thereof), amides, acids (and
salts thereof), carbodiimides, guanidines, allophanates, biurets, oxazolidinones,
and other substances containing one or more fluorinated groups, as well as mixtures
and blends thereof. Such agents are well known to those skilled in the art, see e.g.,
Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd Ed., Vol. 24, pp. 448-451 and
many (e.g., SCOTCHGARD® Fabric Protector, 3M) are commercially available as ready-made
formulations.
[0038] In addition to the fluorochemical, the spin finish typically also includes any conventional
spin oil used on extruded thermoplastic polymers. However, the spin finish may be
aqueous without any spin oil. The spin finish can be applied using methods known in
the art. One example includes kiss roll application. The lower part of the kiss roll
dips in the finish bath, while the yarn tangentially moves over the top part. The
add-on level of spin oil can be varied by changing several parameters, such as the
geometry between yarn and roll, roll speed and the concentration of spin oil in the
spin finishing bath. When spin oil is used, the parameters will be adjusted so that
the residual amount of spin oil on the filament will be between 0.01% and 1.2% by
weight, preferably between 0.01% and 0.6% by weight, based on the total weight of
filaments and spin oil. Most preferably, the residual amount of spin oil will be less
than 0.4%.
[0039] The following examples further illustrate the invention.
EXAMPLES
[0040] All parts, and percentages, in the Examples and Comparative Examples are by weight
unless otherwise noted.
[0041] Respective data of oil and water repellency and soil resistance shown in the Examples
and Comparative Examples were based on the following methods of measurement:
Water repellency (WR) The water repellency of substrates was measured using a series of water-isopropyl
alcohol test liquids. The water repellency of the substrates are expressed in terms
of the "WR" rating. The WR rating corresponds to the most penetrating test liquid
that did not penetrate or wet the substrate surface after 15 seconds exposure to the
substrate. Substrates penetrated by or resistant to 100% water (0% isopropyl alcohol),
the least penetrating test liquid, were given a rating of 0. Substrates resistant
to 100% isopropyl alcohol (0% water), the most penetrating test liquid, were given
a rating of 10. Other intermediate ratings were calculated by dividing the percent
isopropyl alcohol in the test liquid by 10, e.g., a treated substrate resistant to
a 70%/30% isopropyl alcohol/water blend, but not to an 80%/20% blend, would be given
a rating of 7.
Oil repellency (OR) The oil repellency of substrates was measured using the AATCC procedure, standard
test method No. 118-1983. The oil repellency of the substrates are expressed in terms
of the "OR" rating.
Dry soil resistance : The dry soil resistance of substrates was measured using a method described in
US 5,370,919. A value of 5 indicates that there is no increase in soiling versus an
unsoiled sample. A dry soil rating of 1 indicates that the substrate was severely
soiled.
Determination of Fluorine in the Fiber
[0042] To determine the amount of fluorine in the extruded fiber described in the examples
the following method was used. A known weight of the sample was placed in an ignition
basket made from platinum wires. The sample was then decomposed in a sealed polycarbonate
flask in the presence of oxygen and a known volume of buffer solution, TISAB m (available
from Orion). After absorption in the buffer solution, the fluoride was measured with
an Orion 9409 (fluoride sensitive) electrode connected to a pH meter using the mV-mode
of operation. The amount of fluoride was calculated from the mV reading using a graph
plotted using data collected from measurements on standard fluoride solutions. All
samples were analyzed in duplicate and the results should show less than 10% variation
to be considered uniform. When properly calibrated, the electrode measurement is reproducible
with a deviation of 2%.
[0043] Roll Build Up: Roll build up was measured by visually observing the amount of buildup on processing
equipment during the production runs described in the examples. A scale of 0 to 5
was used to quantify the observed level of build up with 0 representing no visible
build up and 5 representing severe build up. Values of 0 and 1 would represent very
acceptable levels of roll build up.
Abbreviations
[0044] The following abbreviations and trade names are used in the examples:
PP polypropylene HG 235 J, a polypropylene with MFI 25, available from Borealis
Genapol™ UD 080 C11H23(OCH2CH2)100H (55% linear, 45% branched), available from BASF
Alfonic™ 6-8,5 C6H13(OCH2CH2)8.5OH, available from Condea-Vista, Austin
PMA polymer melt additive
PMA-1 C8F17SO2N(C2H5)CH2CH2O(CH2CH2O)7CH3
PMA-2 A 1:1 blend of Genapol™ UD 080 with MEFOSA/Alfonic™ 6-8.5 that was prepared according
to the procedure for the synthesis of fluorochemical F-18, in US 5,804,625, but using
Alfonic™ 6-8.5 instead of Triton™ X-100
MEFOSA C8F17SO2N(CH3)H
PMA-3 Genapol™ UD 080
ETFOSE N-ethyl perfluorooctyl sulfonamido ethyl alcohol
PAPI Voronate M220, polyaromatic polymethylene polyisocyanate, available from Dow Chemical
(Netherlands)
OWR Fluorochemical for use in spin finish.
OWR-1 A 50/50 blend of FC 398 and FC 399 Scotchgard™ Carpet Protectors, 24% solids, both
commercially available from 3M.
OWR-2 Scotchgard™ Protector FC 248, 30% solids, commercially available from 3M.
OWR-3 Scotchgard™ Protector FC 3548, 30% solids, commercially available from 3M.
OWR-4 Scotchgard™ Protector FC 5102, 30% solids, commercially available from 3M.
OWR-5 Scotchgard™ Protector FC 3860, 15% solids, commercially available from 3M.
OWR-6 Scotchgard™ Protector FC 3583, 20% solids, commercially available from 3M.
OWR-7 PAPI/ETHYLFOSE 1/3, prepared by heating PAPI and ETFOSE at 60°C in ethylacetate,
until completion of isocyanate reaction. The product was emulsified with Rew IM/OA
(6% on solids) and Atpol E 5721 (2% on solids) at 20% solids.
OWR-8 Scotchgard™ Protector FC 1374, 20% solids, commercially available from 3M.
Rewopon IM/OA Imidazoline type surfactant, available from Rewo, Germany
Atpol E 5721 Alkylethoxylate, available from ICI, Wilton, UK.
SF Spin finish
FA 2820 Spin finish available from Zschimmer und Schwartz (Germany).
FA 2825 Spin finish available from Zschimmer und Schwartz (Germany).
Lurol™ NF-6239-20 Spin finish available from Devan NV (Belgium).
Lurol™ PP-3919 Spin finish available from Devan NV (Belgium).
rpm Revolutions per minute
Ex. Example
General Procedure for Producing Yarn
[0045] In a first step, masterbatches of polypropylene containing 25% (unless indicated
otherwise) hydrophilicity imparting compound were prepared and extruded into granules.
The granules were further blended with additional polypropylene to obtain an extrudable
polypropylene composition comprising the desired level of hydrophilicity imparting
compound. The so-formed blends were extruded with a Thermo Alfa single screw extruder
(triply extruder-one end) at 230°C over spin plates with a trilobal cross section.
After leaving the extruder, the filaments passed through a cooling zone over a kiss
roll where an aqueous mixture of spin oil and fluorochemical (spin finishing bath)
was applied. The amount of spin oil and fluorochemical applied to the yarn was varied
by adjusting the kiss roll speed and the concentration of the compounds in the spin
finishing bath. The carpet yarn was then drawn to 3-4 times the extruded length to
obtain a yarn with a tex (weight (g)/1000 m) of 165. During the production of the
yarn, there was little or no roll build up when a hydrophilicity imparting compound
was added to the extrudable composition. Without the use of a hydrophilicity imparting
compound , a sticky layer was deposited on the guidance rolls of the cooling unit
which caused major problems and delays in the production of treated yarn. The yarn
was textured at a temperature of 140°C to 180°C to produce a bulked yarn that would
be particularly useful for carpets. The bulked yarn was visually inspected for mechanical
quality after spinning and texturing and bulked yarn made in accordance with the invention
had no visible broken filaments. In order to create a substrate to test oil and water
repellency and soil resistance, yarns were wrapped closely together around a piece
of cardboard so there were no gaps between the yarns and a flat surface comprising
one layer of yarn was obtained.
Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Example C-1
[0046] Examples 1 to 3 were made by using 0.4% PMA-1 as hydrophilicity imparting compound.
The spin finishing bath contained different amounts of FA 2820 and OWR-1. Comparative
Example C-1 was made without the use of PMA-1. In this case, it will be noted that
a higher level of spin finish was needed in order to avoid too much static build up.
Fiber composition and extrusion parameters of fibers are recorded in Table 1.
Table 1 :
Composition and Extrusion Parameters of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex. |
SF* (%) |
OWR-1 (%) |
Screw Speed (rpm) |
Roll Build Up |
1 |
7 |
8 |
85 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
12 |
85 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
85 |
1 |
C-1 |
10 |
8 |
52 |
5 |
* This value represents the percentage of spin finish used in the spin finishing bath,
not the residual amount of spin finish on the fiber. |
[0047] The data shows that samples prepared using PMA-1 had low or no roll build up despite
the fact that a fairly low concentration of PMA-1 was used. During the run to produce
Comparative Example C-1, severe roll build up occurred almost immediately, and the
problem was more severe than would have been expected given the fact that only a slightly
higher level of spin finish was used to make the C-1 fiber than was used to prepare
the fibers of Examples I to 3.
[0048] The fibers were tested to determine their oil and water repellencies and dry soil
resistance. The results are recorded in Table 2.
Table 2 :
Properties of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex |
OR |
WR |
Dry soil |
F-Analysis (ppm) |
1 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
1652 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3.5 |
2663 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
3.5 |
1878 |
C-1 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
707 |
[0049] Although the repellent properties of C-1 were acceptable, there was such severe roll
build-up during production that the process would be considered unacceptable for commercial
manufacturing. Examples 1 and 2 had good dry soil values and acceptable oil and water
repellencies. Example 3 had rather low oil and water repellency values but a good
dry soil resistance.
Examples 4 to 11 and Comparative Examples C-2 to C-6
[0050] In Examples 4 to 11, PP containing 0.45 % PMA-1 was extruded. Different spin finishes
and amounts of OWR-1 were added to the spin finishing bath. Comparative Examples C-2
to C-6 were made with 0.45% PMA-1 in the melt, but without the use of any fluorochemical
in the spin finishing bath. The amounts and types of spin finish and OWR-1 used, level
of roll build up, oil and water repellencies and dry soil resistances, and fluorine
content are given in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3
Composition and Extrusion of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex |
Spin Finish (%) |
OWR-1 (%) |
Roll Build Up |
4 |
7% FA 2825 |
8 |
0 |
5 |
7% FA 2820 |
8 |
0 |
6 |
7% FA 2820 |
12 |
0 |
7 |
7% Lurol™ NF-6239-20 |
12 |
0 |
8 |
12% Lurol™ NF-6239-20 |
12 |
0 |
9 |
20% Lurol™ NF-6239-20 |
12 |
1 |
10** |
7% Lurol™ PP-3919 |
12 |
0 |
11 |
7% Lurol™ PP-3919 |
12 |
0 |
C-2 |
7% FA 2825 |
-- |
0 |
C-3 |
7% FA 2820 |
-- |
0 |
C-4 |
7% Lurol™ NF-6239-20 |
-- |
0 |
C-5 |
20% Lurol™ NF-6239-20 |
-- |
0 |
C-6 |
7% Lurol™ PP-3919 |
-- |
0 |
** This trial was run with a kiss roll speed of 18 rpm instead of the standard 13.5
rpm. Yet the increased speed did not cause any major problems, indicating that processes
conducted according to the invention are not as sensitive to an increase in spin finish
add-on level as fiber spinning processes conducted without hydrophilicity imparting
compound. |
Table 4
Evaluation of Oil and Water Repellency and Dry Soil Resistance |
Ex |
OW |
WR |
Soll Resistance |
F-Analysis |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3.5 |
2243 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
2512 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2.5 |
2910 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
3.5 |
2442 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
2258 |
9 |
3 |
7 |
3.5 |
2613 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
1.5 |
3122 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
2.5 |
2524 |
C-2 |
0 |
0 |
3.5 |
1574 |
C-3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1474 |
C-4 |
0 |
0 |
3.5 |
1898 |
C-5 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1827 |
C-6 |
0 |
0 |
2.5 |
1871 |
[0051] The data shows that fibers prepared with PMA-1 and OWR-1 in most instances possessed
acceptable oil and water repellency properties and fairly good dry soil resistance
properties, yet produced little or no roll build up.
Examples 12 to 15 and Comparative Example C-7
[0052] Examples 12 to 15 were made using various amounts of PMA-1. The spin finishing bath
contained different amounts of spin finish Lurol™ NF-6239-20 and 12% OWR-1. The composition
and extrusion parameters for the examples are reported in Table 5 and the fiber properties
are reported in Table 6. In Comparative Example C-7, no PMA was added.
Table 5
Composition and Extrusion Parameters of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex. |
SF* (%) |
PMA (%) |
Screw Speed (rpm) |
Roll Build Up |
12 |
20 |
0.1 |
48 |
3 |
13 |
20 |
0.2 |
63 |
1 |
14 |
10 |
0.2 |
63 |
2 |
15 |
10 |
0.3 |
79 |
1 |
C-7 |
20 |
0 |
50 |
5 |
* This value represents the percentage of spin finish used in the spin finishing bath,
not the residual amount of spin finish on the fiber. |
[0053] The data shows that the use of PMA-1 in the melt, even at very low concentrations,
reduces roll build up.
Table 6
Properties of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex |
OR |
WR |
Dry Soil Resistance |
12 |
2 |
5 |
3.5 |
13 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
14 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
15 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
C-7 |
1 |
6 |
3.5 |
[0054] Although some of the repellent properties of C-7 were good, severe roll build up
rendered the process used to make the fiber unacceptable. Examples 12 to 15 possessed
reasonably acceptable oil and water repellent properties and good dry soil resistance
values.
Examples 16 to 26 and Comparative Example C-8
[0055] In these examples, a more diluted PMA/PP master batch (3%) was used to prepare the
fibers than was used in the other examples. The total amount of PMA-1 to prepare each
Example is reported in Table 7. The spin finishing bath contained 8% OWR-1 and the
type and amount of spin finish reported in Table 7. Comparative Example C-8 was made
without the use of PMA-1. The compositions of the fibers are presented in Table 7
and the fiber properties are presented in Table 8.
Table 7
Ex |
Spin Finish |
SF* (%) |
PMA-1 (%) |
Roll Build Up |
16 |
Lurol™ NF 6239-20 |
20 |
0.13 |
1 |
17 |
Lurol™ NF 6239-20 |
20 |
0.26 |
2 |
18 |
Lurol™ NF 6239-20 |
15 |
0.26 |
0 |
19 |
Lurol™ NF 6239-20 |
15 |
0.34 |
0 |
20 |
Lurol™ NF 6239-20 |
15 |
0.45 |
0 |
21 |
FA 2825 |
10 |
0.13 |
3 |
22 |
FA 2825 |
10 |
0.26 |
4 |
23 |
FA 2825 |
10 |
0.34 |
3 |
24 |
FA 2820 |
10 |
0.34 |
3 |
25 |
FA 2820 |
10 |
0.45 |
0 |
26 |
FA2820 |
7 |
0.45 |
1 |
C-8 |
Lurol™ NF 6239-20 |
20 |
0 |
5 |
* This value represents the percentage of spin finish used in the spin finishing bath,
not the residual amount of spin finish on the fiber. |
Table 8
Properties of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex. |
OR |
WR |
Dry Soil Resistance |
16 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
17 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
18 |
1 |
2 |
2.5 |
19 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
20 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
21 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
22 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
23 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
24 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
25 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
26 |
2 |
3 |
3.5 |
C-8 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
[0056] The data shows that the process of the invention can be optimized to minimize roll
build up by proper selection of spin finish, spin finish level and PMA concentration.
Examples 27 to 34 and Comparative Example C-9
[0057] In Examples 27 to 34, PP fibers were extruded using 0.4% PMA-1. The spin finishing
bath contained 15% Lurol™ NF 6239-20 and the various fluorochemicals listed in Table
9. Comparative Example C-9 was made without hydrophilicity imparting compound or fluorochemical.
The composition of the fibers and roll build up values are set forth in Table 9 and
the fiber properties are set forth in Table 10.
Table 9 :
Composition and Extrusion Parameters of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex. |
Fluorochemical |
Fluorochemical (%) |
Roll Build Up |
27 |
OWR-1 |
8 |
2 |
28 |
OWR-2 |
6.7 |
0 |
29 |
OWR-3 |
6.7 |
0 |
30 |
OWR-4 |
10 |
0 |
31*** |
OWR-5 |
6.7 |
0 |
32*** |
OWR-6 |
10 |
0 |
33 |
OWR-7 |
10 |
1 |
34 |
OWR-8 |
10 |
0 |
C-9 |
-- |
0 |
0 |
*** Slight static build up observed during production. |
Table 10
Properties of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex |
OR |
WR |
27 |
2 |
5 |
28 |
1 |
0 |
29 |
1 |
0 |
30 |
5 |
4 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
2 |
6 |
34 |
0 |
0 |
C-9 |
0 |
0 |
[0058] The data shows that the oil and water repellency values achieved by each spin finishing
bath composition is, to some extent, a function of the type of fluorochemical used
to prepare the bath.
Examples 35 to 38 and Comparative Example C-10
[0059] In Examples 35 to 38, PMA-2 was used as hydrophilidty imparting compound, at concentrations
of either 0.4 or 0.8% as indicated in Table 11. The spin finishing bath contained
15% Lurol™ NF 6239-20 and the type and amount of fluorochemical given in Table 11.
The fiber compositions and roll build up values are presented in Table 11 and the
fiber properties are presented in Table 12.
Table 11
Ex |
Fluorochemical |
Fluorochemical (%) |
PMA (%) |
Roll Build Up |
35 |
OWR-1 |
8 |
0.4 |
3 |
36*** |
OWR-1 |
8 |
0.8 |
0 |
37 |
OWR-3 |
6.7 |
0.4 |
0 |
38 |
OWR-3 |
6.7 |
0.8 |
0 |
*** Some static build up observed during processing. |
Table 12 :
Properties of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex |
OR |
WR |
35 |
2 |
1 |
36 |
2 |
3 |
37 |
1 |
0 |
38 |
1 |
1 |
[0060] The data shows that roll build up and oil and water repellency can be optimized by
proper selection of the type and amount of PMA and the type and amount of fluorochemical.
Examples 39 and 40
[0061] Examples 39 and 40 were made using 0.4% PMA-3. The spin finishing bath contained
15% Lurol™ NF 6239-20 and the type and amounts of fluorochemical reported in Table
13. The fiber compositions and roll build up values are reported in Table 13 and the
fiber properties are reported in Table 14.
Table 13
Ex |
Fluorochemical |
Fluorochemical (%) |
Roll Build Up |
39 |
OWR-1 |
8 |
2 |
40 |
OWR-3 |
6.7 |
0 |
Table 14
Properties of Polypropylene Fibers |
Ex. |
OR |
WR |
39 |
1 |
4 |
40 |
1 |
2 |