FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a developer composition having less tendency to
sludge formation in the developing step of the processing of light-sensitive silver
halide photographic materials.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Sludge formation in developers used in the processing of light-sensitive silver halide
photographic materials is a well-known problem clients are confronted with. In the
developer solution a deposit, known as silver sludge on the walls of the developer
tank, on the rollers and on the racks are forming an ever lasting problem. In rinsing
water microbiological growth is permanently causing dirt. Addition of fungicide-treated
water as a solution proposed in US-A 4,839,273 is however not always desired from
an ecological point of view.
[0003] The presence of these undesired precipitates gives rise to failures on the processed
film surface and, as a consequence thereof, to lowering of the diagnostic value of
the obtained images and to the need to stop the machine in order to provide a long
cleaning time, which is very expensive: silver sludge formed is not easy to oxidize
as silver is a precious metal, requiring strong oxidants. As the well-known potassium
bichromate is not desired from a point of view of ecology, weaker alternative oxidants
are even taking longer times.
[0004] When a light-sensitive photographic silver halide material becomes processed, silver
halide at the sites exposed by irradiation is transformed into metallic silver, catalyzed
by the presence of latent image centers in the silver halide crystal, by the reducing
compounds in the developer solution like hydroquinones, phenidones, ascorbic acid,
reductic acid, etc.. In order to provide rapid processing it is necessary to get a
quick dissolution of the non-exposed silver halide, e.g. by the presence of sulfite
in suitable amounts. In the developer however the dissolved silver halide becomes
also (slowly) reduced into metallic silver nuclei, acting as a catalytic center stimulating
further reduction of silver ions. Growth of those silver nuclei up to larger grey-black
particles of more than 1 µm, together with coalescence and coagulation of smaller
particles makes said particles form dirty flocculates, having the undesired effects
of sludge formation mentioned hereinbefore.
[0005] Hitherto measures have been taken in order to dissolve lower amounts of unexposed
silver halide in the developer, especially for crystals rich in silver chloride (see
e.g. US-A's 5,641,620 and 5,707,793 and EP-A 0 851 282) as the solubility product
of silver chloride is about 100 times the one of silver bromide. Use in the developer
solution of lower amounts of e.g. sulfite, promoting dissolution of silver halides,
is advantageous. This is however opposite to the advantage of rapid processing of
film materials coated with light-sensitive layers having emulsion crystals rich in
silver chloride and moreover, opposite to the thereby offered advantageous use of
lower amounts of developer replenisher. A solution for the problem of sludge formation
as has been set forth has e.g. been given in EP-A's 0 136 582, 0 223 883, 0 785 467
and 0 789 272 and in US-A 5,240,823, wherein thioctic acid, polysulfide compounds
having carboxylic acid, sulfonic acid, etc. and aminoalkane thiosulfonic acid or a
salt thereof have been used.
[0006] Another measure applied in order to reach the same effects can be obtained by making
use of a compound inhibiting dissolution by adsorption at the surface of the silver
halide crystals. Protection of the said surface by adsorption effectively inhibits
the dissolution of silver halide indeed, so that less silver ions are diffusing into
the developer solution. A disadvantage however is the simultaneous inhibition of the
velocity of the developing reaction so that a strong influence on sensitometry may
occur in that speed, maximum density and contrast may be suppressed. Useful agents
inhibiting dissolution of silver halide in a developer composition have been proposed
as e.g. thioether compounds in US-A 5,821,040; the mercapto-s-triazines from US-A
5,300,410 and the mercapto or disulfide compounds in US-A 5,364,746.
[0007] In spite of all measures silver ions may (and will) diffuse into the developer. In
order to overcome the disadvantages already mentioned hereinbefore a suitable measure
is to provide the presence of complexing agents into the said developer in order to
occlude silver ions into a complex, forming a complex ion wherein the silver ions
are protected against reduction by reducing developing agents. The said complex ion,
opposite to silver metal formed by reduction, remains in the developer solution without
causing sludge formation.
[0008] When in spite of application of an inhibitor and/or a complexing agent for silver
ions no satisfying solution can be offered for the problems situated hereinbefore,
addition of products providing (anionic) charges to the particles can be added in
order to decrease the velocity of particle growth and flocculation as has e.g. been
suggested in EP-A 0 223 883 and in US-A's 5,457,011 and 5,840,471 as well as in US-A
5,824,458 wherein mercapto-alkyl carboxylic acids, mercapto-alkylamides or compounds,
combining these two compounds have been proposed, thereby combining inhibition of
dissolution and charging dissolved silver ions.
[0009] As is evident to anyone skilled-in-the-art of photography in the processing of materials
coated with huge amounts of silver halide, problems will become more severe, as e.g.
in the processing of radiographic materials used in diagnostic imaging, and still
more in the processing of non-destructive film materials as has been set forth in
EP-A's 0 620 483, 0 620 484 and 0 621 506.
[0010] Another form of sludge formation may occur in the developer and fixer solutions during
processing as a consequence of the use of more ecologically interesting developing
agents like ascorbic acid known from EP-A's 0 731 381, 0 731 382, 0 732 619 and Research
Dislosure No. 371052, p. 185-224, published March 1, 1995, especially when the silver
halide materials are containing higher amounts of calcium, e.g. when using gelatin
rich in calcium ions: oxidized ascorbic acid developer contains considerable amounts
of oxalic acid, thereby forming calcium oxalate precipitate, as has been set forth
in US-A 5,723,267.
[0011] As already mentioned hereinbefore solving the problem of sludge formation set forth
hereinbefore may lay burden on the desirable use of low replenishing amounts, set
forth e.g. more specifically for ascorbic acid developers in EP-A 0 573 700 and in
US-A 5,503,965.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
[0012] Therefore it is an object of the present invention to provide a photographic developer
composition showing a reduced amount of sludge formation in order to eliminate the
problems caused thereby like e.g. staining of the processed photographic material,
in particular when low amounts of developer replenisher are used.
[0013] It is a further object of the present invention to postpone the formation of a precipitate
in a photographic developer during processing of an exposed silver halide photographic
material.
[0014] Another object of the present invention is to reduce the frequency of cleaning tanks
containing developer solution in an automatic processor to at most twice a year.
[0015] It is still a further object of the present invention to prevent staining of the
processed photographic film material, more particularly when said material is coated
from high amounts of silver halide and/or silver halides having a higher solubility
and/or when said material is loaded with high amounts of calcium compounds.
[0016] More in particular it is an object of the present invention to provide a developer
having ascorbic acid as an ecologically interesting developing compound in order to
process silver halide photographic film materials having low amounts of calcium compounds
without stain or sludge formation, even when low replenishing amounts of developer
are used.
[0017] Further on it is an object of the present invention to provide a method of processing
materials having a low buffering capacity in dedicated developers preventing staining
of the processed materials, even at low replenishing levels.
[0018] Further objects will become apparent from the description hereinafter.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0019] The above mentioned objects are realized by providing a black-and-white silver halide
developer composition, said composition comprising, besides one or more developing
agent(s), agent(s) preventing oxidation thereof and agent(s) providing pH buffering,
at least one silver complexing agent, characterized in that said silver complexing
agent has a silver complexing stability ratio of at least 70 %, wherein said silver
complexing stability is determined after dissolving 50 mg of the said complexing agent
in 200 ml of said developer composition, adding thereto under constant vigorous stirring
74 ml of a solution of silver nitrate having a concentration of 0.0005 moles/liter,
adding over a period of 30 minutes said solution to the said developer solution thereby
providing a total amount of added silver expressed as equivalent amount of silver
nitrate of 15 mg/l, leaving said solution unstirred in order to provide an equilibrium
state between formed precipitate and supernatant developer liquid and measuring the
silver content in the said supernatant liquid after 3 weeks; wherein said complex
stability ratio is calculated as ratio of silver content in supernatant liquid to
total amount of silver added, and wherein said composition comprises, besides said
silver complexing agent having a silver complexing stability ratio of at least 70
%, at least one agent preventing silver dissolution, characterized in that said agent
preventing silver dissolution makes silver content of the developer decrease in an
amount of more than 50 % versus in the absence thereof, without loss in speed in an
amount of more than 0.10 log Exposure after processing in said developer composition.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0020] While the present invention will hereinafter be described in connection with preferred
embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention
to those embodiments.
[0021] In the following description the developer solution one of the solutions required
in a processing cycle of black-and-white silver halide photographic materials (besides
fixer solution, rinsing solution and, optionally, stabilizer solution) may be any
of the solutions which is used in order to develop said black-and-white photographic
material, i.a. a starting solution, a seasoned developer, a developing solution ready-for-use
or the concentrated developer compositions thereof.
[0022] In order to avoid problems it is advised to make use of a developer starter solution:
in order to minimize differences of performance of the photographic system minimizing
differences in the composition between fresh and seasoned fixer solution is preferred,
in that upon starting the process with a fresh developer, the developer solution chemistry
in the processor is the replenishment developer solution chemistry, whether or not
with a supplementary additive mixed therewith, said supplementary additive being the
developer starter solution.
[0023] Said "fresh developer" is defined as the developer present in the developer unit
of the processor before any film has passed, or in the alternative, the developer
in which a very little amount of film was run, well before a steady state or equilibrium
situation is reached (e.g. resulting in a "half-seasoned" developer in "running equilibrium
conditions").
[0024] The "developer replenisher solution" is defined as the unused developer present in
the developer container which is, in the method of the present invention, mixed in
the developer unit with developer starter solution in order to prepare the "fresh
developer" solution defined hereinbefore. It is clear that said "developer replenishing
solution" is added further to the developer unit as the film is being processed, acting
as a commonly used "replenisher" too.
[0025] The "seasoned developer" is defined as the developer present in the developer unit
of the processor after processing enough film in order to reach a steady-state or
an equilibrium situation, depending on the amounts of replenisher used. In order to
reach said steady-state, the said developer is topped up with the "developer replenisher
solution" defined hereinbefore.
[0026] As already mentioned hereinbefore the said developer solution comprises a mixture
of a developer starter solution and developer replenisher solution, wherein it is
understood that both solutions have been mixed before addition to the developer unit
or tank of the automatic processor. In another embodiment an additional step is the
step of adding of a developer starter solution to the developer replenisher solution
which is present in the said developer unit or tank. In that case said developer starter
solution is preferably added before starting processing, although it is not excluded
to add the said developer starter solution during processing, i.e. after the processing
has been started, before a "running equilibrium" or "seasoned" condition or state
has been reached. In a preferred embodiment addition of the said starter developer
solution proceeds before starting the processing cycle, i.e. when adding developer
starter solution to developer replenisher solution the latter being present in a developer
unit or tank of the processor. The case wherein developer starter solution is present
in the developer tank before developer replenishing solution is added thereto and
mixed therewith is however not excluded, so that more generally during processing
the step of mixing of developer starter solution and fixer replenishing solution in
a developer unit or tank of the said processor is possible. In a preferred embodiment
however said developer starter solution is mixed with the developer replenishing solution
in the processor before starting processing.
[0027] In one embodiment the developer starter solution is a buffering solution. Said buffering
solution alters pH of the developer to the required value: so in a preferred embodiment
said developer starter solution alters pH to a value in the range from - 0.3 up to
+ 0.3 units of the pH of the developer solution after seasoning. In another embodiment
said developer starter solution is water or an alkaline solution. In still another
embodiment an amount of developer starter solution is proportional to tank volume
of the developer solution in the processor. In a further embodiment an amount of developer
starter solution is less than 10 % of volume of replenisher solution with which it
is mixed upon starting processing.
[0028] Developer solutions may contain glutardialdehyde as hardening agent but in a preferred
embodiment the developer is free thereof. It is clear that the light-sensitive black-and-white
silver halide photographic materials processed in the developer composition according
to the present invention should be hardened to such an extent that in a developing
step free from hardening agents no problems occur as e.g. "sludge formation" in form
of troubles due to lack of physical strength properties of the materials. A survey
of hardening agents available in order to foreharden coated hydrophilic gelatinous
layers of the said photographic materials has been given e.g. in Research Disclosure
38957, Chapter II.
[0029] As already set forth in the statement of the present invention a black-and-white
silver halide developer composition has been disclosed comprising, besides one or
more developing agent(s), agent(s) preventing oxidation thereof and agent(s) providing
pH buffering,
at least one silver complexing agent, characterized in that said silver complexing agent
has a silver complexing stability ratio of at least 70 %.
[0030] Generally speaking a
silver complexing agent can be defined as an agent which has the ability to form water-soluble silver complexes,
so that the silver complex thus formed is stable enough to withstand the reduction
of the silver complex to metallic silver in the photographic developer.
[0031] The
silver complexing ability of said silver complexing agent is measured by a method containing following steps:
1. dissolving 50 mg of the agent to be tested in 200 ml of developer (ready-for-use
or seasoned);
2. adding, under constant vigorous stirring, 74 ml of a solution of silver nitrate
having a concentration of 0.0005 moles/liter;
3. adding slowly said solution to the developer solution over a period of 30 minutes,
providing a total silver amount of 15 mg/l;
4. leaving the solution unstirred and measuring the silver content in the supernatant
fluid as a function of time: due to the reduction of the silver, a precipitation of
sludge will occur, and the silver content in the supernatant fluid will decrease accordingly;
5. after 3 weeks having been left unstirred the silver in the supernatant fluid is
determined analytically (AAS) and the complex stability ratio is determined: the said complex stability ratio is the ratio of the silver content
in the supernatant fluid to the total amount originally added (15 mg/l). If e.g. after
3 weeks the silver content in the supernatant fluid is 7,5 mg/l then the complex stability
ratio for that substance in that specific developer is 50%.
[0032] As defined in the statement of the present invention said silver complexing stability
is thus determined after dissolving 50 mg of the said complexing agent in 200 ml of
said developer composition, adding thereto under constant vigorous stirring 74 ml
of a solution of silver nitrate having a concentration of 0.0005 moles/liter, adding
over a period of 30 minutes said solution to the said developer solution thereby providing
a total amount of added silver expressed as an equivalent amount of silver nitrate
of 15 mg/l, leaving said solution unstirred in order to provide an equilibrium state
between formed precipitate and supernatant developer liquid and measuring the silver
content in the said supernatant liquid after 3 weeks; wherein said complex stability
ratio is calculated as ratio of silver content in supernatant liquid to total amount
of silver added.
[0033] A silver complexing agent as defined in the statement of the invention moreover makes,
in a preferred embodiment, silver content of the developer in running equilibrium
conditions increase in an amount of more than 1 mg per liter per mmole of said complexing
agent.
[0034] According to the complex stability ratio obtained after 3 weeks the silver complexing
ability of the substance in the corresponding developer is judged to belong to one
of the following categories set forth in the Table 1 hereinafter.
Table 1
| Complexing ability category |
Complex Stability ratio |
|
| Category C1 |
> 90% |
excellent complexing properties |
| Category C2 |
> 70% |
good complexing properties |
| Category C3 |
> 50% |
little complexing properties |
| Category C4 |
<50% |
no or insignificant complexing properties |
[0035] A substance which, in the conditions given above, has
a complex stability ratio of more than 80% (thus belonging to the categories C1 or C2) as described in the experiment above
is defined as a
silver complexing substance suitable for use in the developer composition of the present invention.
[0036] The design of the experiment is critical. In order to get a suitable and predictable
value of actual properties, it is important to add the silver nitrate slowly and as
a highly diluted solution, in order to prevent immediate sludging during the addition
of the silver solution. The experiment proposed gives results which are relevant for
the actual behaviour of the substances under investigation.
[0037] In the developer composition according to the present invention said silver complexing
agent is corresponding to the general formula (I)
MS-L-X (I)
wherein
L is a divalent linking group;
M is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, S-L-X, a group providing a thiolate
anion under alkaline processing conditions and a charge compensating counterion for
the said thiolate anion; and
X is an acidic solubilizing group having a pKa of 7 or less or a salt thereof.
[0038] In a preferred embodiment in the developer composition according to the present invention
in the general formula (I) MS- is linked to an aliphatic carbon atom.
[0039] In the most preferred embodiment MS- is linked to an aliphatic carbon atom and X
is a sulphonic acid or a sulphonate salt.
[0040] Typical examples of complexing agents useful in the current invention are given below.

[0041] Otherwise the agent preventing silver dissolution or the silver elution inhibiting
agent makes that upon processing of silver halide materials part of the silver halide
crystals which is attacked by the photographic developer is not dissolved and eluted
as such.
[0042] The amount of silver dissolved if no use is made from such agent preventing silver
dissolution is highly dependent on the exposure of the material to be developed. Non-exposed
materials clearly release substantially more silver into the photographic developer
solution, and thus give raise to relatively more sludge. In exposed materials however
there is a competition between development and dissolution of the silver halide crystals
and as a result there will be less sludge. The total amount of sludge is thus highly
dependent on the development conditions, on the composition of the film material and
on the developer solution.
[0043] In order to characterize the "silver elution inhibiting properties" of a chemical
compound or substance, called "inhibitor", in a specific photographic developer, following
experiment is used: 30 mg of the inhibitor to be classified is dissolved in 150 ml
of the said specific developer. The photographic developer is brought into a 'developing
tank' and is kept at 35°C. Two times 3 m of an unexposed photographic material having
a width of 48 mm is transported through the developer solution at a speed of 23 cm/min.
The contact time between the developer solution and the film is 31 seconds. Samples
of the developer solution are collected after 3 m has been running through the developer
solution (1) and after 6 m of film has been transported through the developer solution
(2). The silver content in the samples is determined immediately afterwards by AAS
(atomic absorption spectrophotometry). The silver content after having transported
3 m and 6 m of film in the processing respectively is a measure for the "silver elution
inhibition strength" of the inhibitor substance investigated for the particular combination
of film and developer solution.
[0044] A similar (blank) experiment is performed in the absence of the chemical compound
or substance under investigation. The inhibition strength is then defined by comparing
the silver content with and without the substance under investigation in the developer
solution. The "
inhibition strength ratio" of a given "inhibitor" or "silver elution inhibiting compound" (for a typical combination
of film material and developer) is defined as the ratio of the silver content in the
developer solution
containing the sludge inhibiting substance and the silver content in the developer solution
without the said substance after processing
3 m of film in the above defined conditions. According to the inhibition strength ratio,
the inhibitors are classified as represented in Table 2 hereinafter.
Table 2
| |
Inhibition Strength Ratio (3 m) |
Appreciation |
| Category I1 |
<30% |
Very strong inhibition effect |
| Category I2 |
<50% |
Strong inhibition effect |
| Category I3 |
>50% |
Limited, absent or negative inhibition effect (promotion of elution of silver) |
[0045] A substance which, in the conditions as set forth, has an inhibition strength ratio
of less than 50% in the experiment described above is defined as a silver dissolution
inhibiting substance and thus corresponds to the Categories I1 or I2.
[0046] The developer composition of the present invention thus comprises, besides the silver
complexing agent as defined before, at least one agent preventing silver dissolution
characterized in that said agent preventing silver dissolution makes silver content
of the developer decrease in an amount of more than 50 % versus in the absence thereof
(or otherwise said: has an inhibition strength ratio of less than 50 %, wherein said
"inhibition strength ratio" is defined as set forth above), without loss in speed
in an amount of more than 0.10 log Exposure after processing in said developer composition,
when the dissolution inhibitor is added in an amount in order to get a concentration
of 50 mg/l.
[0047] In the developer composition according to the present invention said agent preventing
silver salt dissolution preferably corresponds to the general formula (II)

wherein Z represents atoms necessary to form a substituted or unsubstituted 5- or
6-membered hetero-aromatic ring, provided that the said hetero-aromatic ring is not
substituted by a solubilizing group having a pK
a of 7 or less, and M is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, a group providing
a thiolate anion under alkaline processing conditions and a charge compensating counterion
for the said thiolate anion.
[0048] In a more preferred embodiment, the said hetero-aromatic ring is a 5-membered hetero-aromatic
ring and in a still more preferred embodiment the said hetero-aromatic ring is selected
from the group consisting of triazoles, thiadiazoles, imidazoles and benzimidazoles.
[0049] Typical examples of silver salt dissolution inhibitors are given below :

[0050] It is clear that a number of substances actually promotes the elution of silver ions
out of the film material (negative inhibition effect) . If these substances do not
stabilize the eluted silver, they tend to promote the occurrence of sludge, and are
therefore undesired. If these substances form a silver complex which is stable enough
to stabilize the (increased) amount of eluted silver, this component may nevertheless
be effective in preventing silver sludge formation.
[0051] As has been established above, silver elution inhibitors also tend to have a photographic
influence. Therefore, the concentration of these inhibitors is important. When the
concentration is too low, the anti-sludging action will be insufficient. When otherwise
the concentration is too high, there will be significant sensitometric disadvantages.
It has been found now that in practical circumstances the amount of inhibitor required
for an optimum performance, i.a. to get a perfect balance between a desired sensitometry
and anti-sludging properties, is not the one which would be expected on the basis
of the sensitometric effect of the anti-sludging substances as assessed in laboratory
experiments. Indeed in long-term regeneration (replenishment) experiments it has been
found that an optimal performance in sludge can be achieved when
the concentration of the inhibitor in the replenisher is appreciably higher than in
the seasoned or in the fresh developer. It is assumed that this is due to the adsorption of the silver elution inhibitor
on the image silver which causes depletion of the developer. As a consequence a clear
effect on sensitometry is not observed and is smaller than expected and a higher concentration
of the substance in the developer replenisher is allowed without having a dramatic
influence on sensitometry as speed or gradation decreases.
[0052] Silver complexing agents tend to perform better in the silver complexing experiment
described above when the concentration of the silver complexing substance is increased.
From a practical point of view however an increase in the concentration of the silver
complexing agent does not necessarily improve the performance with respect to sludge
formation. Due to an increased amount of complexing agents in the developer, the amount
of eluted silver will also increase. If the stability of the complex is insufficient
or if the amount of complexing agent present is too low to stabilize the increased
amount of silver, there is often a decrease in performance with respect to sludge
in that sludge formation is not prevented as desired.
[0053] In the experiments related therewith in order to controll this statement no depletion
of the silver complexing agent was found. From the said experiments it may be concluded
that, opposite to the effects observed with respect to the silver elution inhibition
agents as described above,
complexing agents should not have a substantially increased concentration in the developer
replenisher.
[0054] Many silver elution inhibiting substances exhibit a significant sensitometric effect.
As a consequence these substances are not useful as sludge inhibitors in photographic
developers: a silver elution or dissolution inhibiting agent present in a specific
developer thereby causing a suitable effect with respect to the prevention of sludge
formation and no sensitometric effect is called a suitable substance when in the experiment
described above, it has an
inhibition strength ratio of less than 50% and when it moreover causes a sensitometric loss in sensitivity (measured at a density
of 1.0 above fog) of less than 0.10 log (Exposure), wherein said Exposure is the product
I x t, representing Exposure
Intensity and Exposure
time, upon addition of 50 mg/l of the developer. In this case, the concentration of
50 mg/l refers to the concentration as added to the fresh developer or present in
the seasoned developer and
not to the concentration in the developer replenisher.
[0055] The
combined action of inhibitor and complexant in the developer according to the present invention is explained as follows. The
inhibitor minimizes the amount of silver ions dissolved or washed out from the film
material. The complexing agent prevents the reduction of the eluted silver ions to
silver and further to silver sludge formation. The inhibitors moreover are limiting
the amount of silver ions washed out, and thereby also reduce the amount of complexing
agents to be added in order to stabilize the silver ions in the used developer solution.
The silver elution promoting properties of the complexing agents are thus limited
by the use of a suitable inhibitor.
[0056] In a preferred embodiment according to the present invention the complexing substance
in the developer composition is present in a concentration range between 10 and 2000
mg/l and, more preferably, in a concentration range between 25 and 500 mg/l.
[0057] In a further preferred embodiment the developer composition according to the present
invention has, in running equilibrium conditions, a molar ratio of silver complexing
agent to silver of more than 10:1.
[0058] In the developer composition according to the present invention said developing agents
are selected from the group consisting of hydroquinone, l-ascorbic acid, iso-ascorbic
acid, reductic acid, 1-phenyl-3-pyrazolidine-1-ones (phenidones), salts and derivatives
thereof. Said l-ascorbic acid, iso-ascorbic acid, reductic acid are the more preferred
forms from the ascorbic acid type developers according to the formula (III)
wherein in the formula (V) each of A, B and D independently represents an oxygen atom
or NR'1 ;
X represents an oxygen atom, a sulfur atom, NR'2 ; CR'3R'4 ; C=O; C=NR'5 or C=S;
Y represents an oxygen atom, a sulfur atom, NR''2 ; CR''3R''4 ; C=O; C=NR''5 or C=S;
Z represents an oxygen atom, a sulfur atom, NR'''2 ; CR'''3R'''4 ; C=O; C=NR'''5 or C=S;
n' equals 0, 1 or 2;
each of R'1 to R'5, R''2 to R''5 and R'''2 to R'''5 independently represents hydrogen, alkyl, aralkyl, hydroxyalkyl, carboxyalkyl, alkenyl,
alkynyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, aryl or heterocyclyl; and wherein R'3 and R'4, R''3 and R''4, R'''3 and R'''4, may further form a ring together; and wherein in the case that X=CR'3R'4 and
Y=CR''3CR''4, R3 and R'3 and/or R4 and R'4 may form a ring and in the case that Y=CR''3R''4 and Z=CR'''3CR'''4 with n=1 or 2, R'3 and R''3 and/or R'4 and R''4 may form a ring.
[0059] In a preferred embodiment in the formula (V) A, B and X each represent an oxygen
atom; n'=0; Y=CH-(CHOH)
m'-CH
2-R'
6 wherein m' = 1, 2, 3 or 4 and wherein R'
6 represents OH for m' = 1; and H or OH for m' = 2, 3 or 4. This formula corresponds
with (iso)ascorbic acid.
[0060] As a suitable derivative corresponding to the formula (V), iso-ascorbic acid and
l-ascorbic acid are both preferred.
In another preferred embodiment A and B each represent an oxygen atom; n' = 0 and
X and Y each correspond with C(CH
3)
2.
This formula corresponds with tetramethyl reductic acid.
[0061] The compound(s) according to the formula (V) preferably is (are) present in the developer
solution in an amount comprised between 1 g and 100 g per litre, although a preferred
amount of from 20 up to 50 g per litre is sufficient in many cases.
[0062] Examples of reducing precursor compounds have, e.g., been described in WO's 94/3834
and 94/16362.
[0063] It is clear that within the context of the present invention ascorbic acid is not
merely used in the developer as an antioxidant as e.g. described in WO 93/12463, in
JP-A's 4428673 and 55149936, in GB 1,266,533 and in US-A's 3,865,591; 4,756,997 and
4,839,259 and in the literature as, e.g., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
60 (1938), p. 99 and p. 2084;
61 (1939), p. 442;
64 (1942), p. 1561,
65 (1943), p. 1489;
66 (1944), p. 700 and
104 (1982), p. 6273. According to the method of the present invention said antioxidant
or agent preventing oxidation is selected from the group consisting of a sulfite salt,
l-ascorbic acid, iso-ascorbic acid, reductic acid, salts and derivatives and combinations
thereof. A combination of high amounts of ascorbic acid type compounds and low amounts
of sulfite is therefore highly preferred as the presence of sulfite normally leads
to undesirable odours in the processing. Low amounts of sulfite as e.g. disclosed
in EP-A 0 738 400 are therefore preferred: amounts of less than 0.4 mole per liter
of developer are satisfactory in order to prevent oxidation by air oxygen. According
to the present invention the photographic developer solution thus comprises as an
agent preventing oxidation sulfite present in a free sulfite concentration below 0.4
M.
[0064] According to the present invention besides ascorbic acid, reductic acid, stereoisomers
or derivatives thereof as developing agents the developer comprises, as auxiliary
developing compounds, one or more 1-phenyl-3-pyrazolidine-1-one or 1-phenyl-5-pyrazolidine-1-one,
commonly known as "phenidone" compound. A preferred phenidone compound used in the
method of the present invention is 4,4'-hydroxymethyl-methyl-1-phenyl-3-pyrazolidine-1-one,
which is present in amounts of from 0.5 g up to 5 g/litre of developer. Especially
if iodide ions are present in the developer solution, said preferred phenidone compound
is present in lower amounts as has been disclosed in US-A 5,296,342.
[0065] In a preferred embodiment according to the present invention said developer composition
is substantially free from any polyhydroxybenzene compound, as e.g. hydroquinone,
analogues and/or derivatives therefrom.
[0066] According to the present invention the developer contains pH buffering agent(s),
wherein said agents are selected from the group consisting of carbonates, phosphates
and borates and combinations thereof. More particularly carbonate buffers applied
may be those described in EP-A's 0 565 459 and 0 736 802 (together with borate) and
in US-A's 5,648,205 and 5,738,979; whereas borate buffers may be those as described
in GB-A 2,292,813 and in US-A's 5,702,875; 5,756,271 and 5,853,964 and phosphate buffers
as in US-A's 5,585,610; 5,744,279; 5,858,612 and 5,876,907. It is well known that
the amount of alkali necessary during development is largely dependent on two factors,
namely the amount of silver to be developed (g/m2) and the amount of acid released
during the development reaction (mmoles of hydrogen ions released per mole of developed
silver). As has been extensively disclosed in EP-Application No. 98201862, filed June
5, 1998 it has been found that, apart from these factors, which were known before,
there is another important contribution, in particular in the case of ascorbic acid
developers used at low regeneration rates, and that the main factor which causes these
differences is the buffer capacity of the film materials as defined therein. In order
to provide a stable or constant sensitometry by making use of a developer according
to the present invention processing is performed at low replenishment rates (as e.g.
lower than 200 ml per sq.m., more preferably 150 ml per sq.m. and even lower than
100 ml per sq.m. as described in EP-A 0 874 276). It is further recommended, as described
in EP-Application No. 98201862, filed June 5, 1998, in particular for photographic
materials having silver halide, coated in an amount, expressed as an equivalent amount
of silver nitrate of less than 6 g/m
2 that the said material has a buffering capacity of less than 6 mmole/m
2, preferably of less than 4 mmole/m
2 and even more preferably less than 2.5 mmole/m
2, wherein said buffering capacity is defined as the amount of alkali, expressed in
mmole/square meter required to bridge across pH differences between the material and
the developer. In a preferred embodiment the processing making use of a developer
composition according to the present invention proceeds in a total dry-to-dry processing
time of less than 100 seconds. It is however clear that making use of the developer
of the present invention is not restricted to the processing of materials coated with
such low amounts of silver halide and that also silver halide materials rich in coated
amounts of silver, as e.g. double-side coated materials for non-destructive testing
purposes having an amount of silver up to 20 g per sq.m. and per side of the support,
said amount of silver being expressed as an equivalent amount of silver nitrate, which
have been disclosed e.g. in EP-A 0 698 817. In a preferred embodiment according to
the present invention the developer composition is buffered between a value of from
9.0 up to 11.0 by buffering compounds having a concentration of from 0.3 up to 1.0
mole/litre and more preferably from 0.3 up to 0.7 mole/litre. Particularly suitable
buffering compounds in the developer composition are carbonates as has also been shown
in EP-A 0 565 459, wherein the use of ascorbic acid developers with high concentrations
of carbonate buffering is illustrated. The high carbonate level provides a high degree
of pH buffering and also provides aeration protection via reduced oxygen solubility
in the developer solution. Use of highly buffered ascorbic acid developers as has
been disclosed e.g. in US-A 5,503,965, wherein the instability of ascorbic acid developers
has been tackled not only by the use of highly buffering solutions but in addition
by the use of replenisher solutions having a higher pH, already suggested hereinbefore,
is further recommended. The use of developers having a higher buffer capacity however
increases the likelihood of aluminum sludging in the fixer, since the pH increase
in the fixer solution due to carryover of alkaline developer will be greater. Therefore
in a preferred embodiment a compound having an α-ketocarboxylic acid structure (as
oxalic acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, gluconic acid or derivatives thereof) in
an amount of not more than 3 g per litre is present in the said fixer solution while
starting processing or in the said fixer replenisher.
[0067] In order to compensate during processing for a decrease of pH due to the oxidation
of ascorbic acid type developing agents to oxalic acid it is recommended to provide
pH of the developer replenisher to be higher as e.g. in EP-A 0 573 700 and in US-A
5, 869,218 and more particularly about 0.5 higher than the developer itself as in
US-A 5,503,965; although depending on the composition of the developer pH differences
of 0.1 to 0.3 pH units may be sufficient as disclosed in US-A 5,738,979. In the alternative
mixtures of two pyrazolidones may compensate for pH drop as has been suggested in
EP-A 0 588 408. Ascorbic-acid type developers used in the method of the present invention
preferably have a pH in the range from 9-11, but lower values as e.g. in US-A's 5,702,875;
5,756,271; 5,853,964 and 5,858,610 are not excluded. Alkalizing agents providing the
desired pH are e.g. those described in US-A 5,821,041. According with the present
invention the developer solution has a regeneration rate of less than 150 ml/m2 while
the pH of the developer solution in running equilibrium conditions is between 9.5
and 9.9, with a pH difference between the seasoned developer and the developer replenisher
between 0.3 and 0.6.
[0068] A method of processing a black-and-white silver halide photographic material has
thus, according to the present invention, also been provided wherein said method comprises
the steps of developing, fixing, rinsing and drying, and wherein in running equilibrium
conditions a developer composition according to the present invention as disclosed
hereinbefore is used in the developing step. In a preferred embodiment said developer
composition is replenished with same developer composition in an amount of less than
200 ml/m2, and even more preferably in an amount of less than 150 ml/m2. In an even
more preferred embodiment use is made in the developing step of an ascorbic acid type
developer and an equivalent developer replenisher providing a regeneration amount
of less than 200 ml/m
2 , and more preferably less than 150 ml/m
2.
[0069] From the detailed description hereinbefore it is clear that the present invention
clearly provides a developer for use in the of processing black-and-white light-sensitive
silver halide photographic materials, although the target is more severe for the processing
with less sludge formation when having in the light-sensitive layer(s) of the said
materials photosensitive emulsions rich in silver chloride, wherein said developer
is preferably an ascorbic acid type developer used in a processing which is performed
at low replenishment rates (less than 150 ml/m
2) in order to get a stable or constant sensitometry, even over long working periods
with low total amounts of materials to be developed, with moreover the specific feature
that the said material having low coating amounts of silver halide has a buffering
capacity of less than 6 mmole/m
2.
[0070] Thereby problems are thus encountered with respect to the constancy of the pH of
the ascorbic acid type developer, use of amounts of buffering agents in huge amounts
and combination of differing buffer solutions, use of developer replenishers having
a higher pH than the pH of the developer and all measures taken in order to decrease
deactivation of the developer composition when no material is processed. Especially
when the silver halide materials are containing higher amounts of calcium, e.g. when
using gelatin rich in calcium ions: oxidized ascorbic acid developer contains considerable
amounts of oxalic acid, thereby forming calcium oxalate precipitate, as has been set
forth in US-A 5,723,267. A factor which is important, particularly when making use
of ascorbic or reductic acid type developing agents as in a preferred embodiment of
the developer according to the present invention, is the calcium content of gelatin
used as a colloidal binder in emulsion preparation and/or coating. In most commercial
high-quality inert gelatins the calcium content is about 0.4 %, which corresponds
with about 100 mmole/kg, measured at the end of the preparation process of inert gelatin.
Complex-bound calcium ions strongly decrease the electric potential carried by gelatin.
Substantially "calcium free gelatin" is thus defined as gelatin with a calcium content
at a level below 40 ppm which corresponds with the analytical detection limit. Use
thereof is therefore highly preferred in the context of the present invention in order
to avoid sludging as a consequence of formation of calcium oxalate precipitate due
to generation of oxalic acid as oxidized developing agent in the processing of such
materials. Therefore in the context of the present invention recommended amounts of
calcium present in materials processed when making use of a developer composition
according to the present invention are less than 10 mg/sq.m. as in US-A 5,723,267,
more preferably of less than 5 mg/sq.m. and still more preferably of less than 3 mg/sq.m..
[0071] Materials suitable to be processed in a processing cycle, making use of a developer
composition according to the present invention are light-sensitive black-and-white
silver halide photographic material being single-side or double-side coated materials,
coated on a subbed support with one or more light-sensitive silver halide emulsion
layers, wherein said halide is selected from the group consisting of chloride, bromide
and iodide and mixtures thereof and said emulsion comprises crystals having a habit
selected from the group consisting of a {100} tabular, a {111} tabular and a cubic
habit and mixtures thereof as in BE 93001438, in EP-A's 0 288 949, 0 528 480, 0 555
897, 0 573 373, 0 574 331, 0 592 616, 0 614 111, 0 622 668, 0 581 065, 0 678 772,
0 704 750, 0 709 730, 0 724 193, 0 731 382, 0 736 797, 0 786 694, 0 770 909, 0 809
135, 0 809 139, 0 843 207, 0 851 282, 0 862 083, 0 862 088, 0 866 362, 0 890 873,
0 908 764, 0 911 687 and 0 911 688; in EP-Application No. 98200061, filed January
13, 1998, No. 98200236, filed January 27, 1998; No. 98200281, filed Januari 30, 1998,
No. 98200901, filed March 23, 1998, No. 98201093, filed April 7, 1998, No. 98201862,
filed June 5, 1998 and No. 99200295, filed February 2, 1999 and in US-A's 4,400,463;
4,434,226;4,783,398; 5,035,992; 5,061,609; 5,292,631; 5,230,994; 5,298,372; 5,378,600;
5,420,001, 5,561,038, 5,565,315, 5,607,828, 5,612,176, 5,614,359, 5,629,142; 5,641,620;
5,633,126; 5,677,119; 5,691,128; 5,693,459; 5,707,792; 5,707,793; 5,707,794; 5,712,081;
5,716,769; 5,733,715; 5,756,277; 5,759,759; 5,733,516; 5,733,718; 5,780,209; 5,780,217;
5,800,976; 5,853,972; 5,856,075; 5,871,890; 5,876,913 as well as in WO 93005442.
[0072] The said light-sensitive silver halide emulsions mentioned hereinbefore, present
individually or as a mixture of different emulsions, can be present in one or more
adjacent layers at one side or at both sides of a support material and grains or crystals
present therein may be cubic grains (whether or not with rounded corners as a consequence
e.g. of use of grain growth modifiers, such as e.g. methionin, during crystal preparation)
more rich in silver chloride or more rich in silver bromide with, preferably, in favour
of developablity, at most 3 mole % of iodide and more preferably even less than 1
mole % up to 0.1-0.01 mole % and even grains free from iodide, wherein the crystal
diameter of said cubic grains is normally between 0.10 and 2.0 µm, more preferably
between 0.15 and 1.5 µm and still more preferably between 0.15 and 1.0 µm, depending
on sensitometric requirements (especially sensitivity).
[0073] In another embodiment the said light-sensitive silver halide emulsions present individually
or as a mixture of different emulsions may be present in one or more adjacent layers
at one side or at both sides of the support material and grains or crystals present
therein and may be {111} or {100} tabular grains rich in silver bromide (more than
50 mole % of bromide) or rich in silver chloride (more than 50 mole % of chloride).
Said tabular grains preferably account for at least 50 % of the total projective surface
area of all grains, more preferred for at least 70 % and still more preferred for
at least 90 %, further normally have an average crystal diameter (equivalent circular
diameter leading to an equal total flat surface as the preferred hexagonal {111} or
rectangular {100} grain) of from 0.3 to 3.0 µm, more preferably from 0.5 to 2.5 µm
and still more preferably from 0.5 to 1.5 µm, for an average thickness of the tabular
grain from 0.05 up to 0.30 µm, more preferably from 0.05 to 0.25 µm and still more
preferably from 0.06 to 0.20 µm. Average aspect ratios of the {111} or {100} tabular
grains obtained after calculation from the ratio of diameter to thickness measured
for each grain are in the range 2:1 to 100:1, more preferably from 5:1 to 50:1 and
still more preferably from 5:1 to 20:1 or even from 8:1 to 20:1. Variation coefficients
calculated over grain diameters or thicknesses are normally less than 0.40, more preferably
less than 0.30 and even more preferably in the range from 0.10-0.20, thereby being
indicative for the degree of homogeneity of the grain distribution in an emulsion.
[0074] It should be established that in order to stabilize the thermodynamically unstable
{111} habit of corresponding tabular grains it is recommended to add a crystal habit
modifier (being a habit stabilizer) in the preparation step (especially in the growth
step of the flat parallel twin planes). This is more preferred for {111} grains rich
in silver chloride than for grains rich in silver bromide as, due to large differences
in solubility of both silver halides (factor 100) the more soluble silver chloride
tends to crystallize in a preferred cubic habit. Preferred crystal habit modifiers
which are useful in the preparation of {111} tabular grains for use in the method
of the present invention have e.g. been described in US-A's 5,176,991; 5,178,997;
5,185,239; 5,217,858; 5,221,602; 5,252,452; 5,272,052; 5,286,621, 5,298,385; 5,298,387;
5,298,388; 5,399,478; 5,411,851, 5,411,852, 5,418,127, 5,601,969, 5,691,128 and 5,756,277.
When phases differing in silver halide composition are present over the crystal volume
said crystal is said to have a core-shell structure. More than one shell can be present
and between different phases it may be recommended to have a phase enriched in silver
iodide by applying the so-called conversion technique during preparation. Iodide ions
can be provided by using aqueous solutions of inorganic salts thereof as e.g. potassium
iodide, sodium iodide or ammonium iodide. Iodide ions can also be provided by organic
compounds releasing iodide ions as has e.g. been described in EP-A's 0 561 415, 0
563 701, 0 563 708, 0 649 052 and 0 651 284 and in WO 96/13759. Especially in order
to obtain a more homogeneous iodide distribution in the crystal lattice and over the
whole crystal population iodide ions provided by organic agents releasing iodide ions
are preferred such as mono iodide acetic acid, mono iodide propionic acid, mono iodide
ethanol and even hydrogels containing iodide ions, capable to generate iodide ions.
Another way to provide the same result has been described in US-A's 5,248,587; 5,318,887
and 5,420,007 wherein use has been made of very fine silver iodide emulsion crystals
having an average diameter of about 0.050 µm or even less (so-called Lippmann emulsions).
Although preferred with respect to intrinsic and to spectral sensitivity it is recommended
to limit average iodide concentrations to up to 1 mole %, more preferably to 0.5 mole
%, and still more preferably from 0.1 to 0.3 mole % based on the total silver amount
as higher concentrations retard development and lead to unsatisfactory sensitivities.
Moreover the velocity of fixation can be disturbed in that case and as a consequence
residual colouration may be unavoidable.
[0075] All cited references above are related with the preparation of emulsions having a
crystal habit and halide composition as set forth hereinbefore, and in more particular
references with the use of dedicated protective colloids in the precipitation thereof
(as specific gelatins and/or derivatives, colloidal silica, oxidized cationic starch,
etc.), dopants incorporated in the crystal lattice of the silver halide, built-up
of halide in the crystal volume (homogeneous or heterogeneous as in core-shell emulsions),
measures to provide more homogenous crystal size distributions of silver halide crystals
in silver halide emulsions (with respect to average crystal diameter and/or thickness
- where applied ), chemical ripening thereof (with ripening agents providing chalcogen
- sulphur, selenium, tellurium - sensitization, noble metal - gold, palladium - sensitization,
reduction sensitization, whether or not in combination with each other, spectral sensitization
before, simultaneous with or after said chemical sensitization, addition before coating
of solutions containing stabilizers, development accelerators - which may also be
added to the developer solution in the processing - non-spectrally sensitizing dyes
providing image definition or dye precursors providing shift in image tone or dye
formation, coating aids, plasticizers, antistatic agents, matting agents, sequestering
agents, image tone modifiers, agents enhancing covering power, and even anti-sluding
agents - silver complexing agents and silver dissolution inhibiting agents - as disclosed
in the developer composition of the present invention, said anti-sludging agents being
present in lower amounts than set forth hereinbefore in the processing of coated materials.
All these topics have also been extensively disclosed in Research Disclosures, further
called "RD", No. 340, P. 612-615(1992); No. 375, p. 491-495(1995); No. 377, p. 607-608(1995),
No. 381, p. 45-59(1996), No. 388, p. 509-512(1996), No. 389, p. 591-639(1996), No.
391, p. 713-723(1996),No. 394, p. 100-107(1997), No. 394, p. 120-129(1997), No. 394,
p. 83-89(1997), No. 401, p. 583-594(1997), No. 404, p. 867-868(1997), and No. 412,
p. 1058(1998).
[0076] More particular black-and-white silver halide photographic materials suitable to
be processed in developer compositions according to the present invention are radiographic
materials (as e.g. double-side coated materials for chest imaging - see US-A's 5,595,864;
5,693,370 and 5,811,229; and EP-A's 0 678 772 and 0 770 909 - or single-side coated
materials for mammography as disclosed e.g. in EP-A 0 874 275 and in US-A 5,449,599),
laser recording materials (as e.g. hardcopy materials as described in EP-A 0 610 608
and in US-A 5,712,081) and micrographic materials. (as e.g. those described in US-A
5,523,197 and in EP-A's 0 634 691, 0 634 692 and 0 634 693) .
[0077] Having described in detail preferred embodiments of the current invention, it will
now be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous modifications can be made
therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appending
claims and in following examples.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
[0078] In order to determine the complexing properties of compounds having ability to form
silver complexes as defined in the statement of the present invention following experiment
was performed, wherein as a useful substance the compound according to the formula
(C-2) was examined.

The silver complexing ability was measured as follows :
1. From compound CC-2 50 mg was added to 200 ml of the test developer the composition
of which is given hereinafter in Table 3.
2. Under constant vigorous stirring making use therefore from a magnetic stirrer,
74 ml of a 0.0005 mole/l of a silver nitrate solution was slowly added to the developer
solution over a period of 30 minutes, giving a total silver amount of 15 mg/1.
3. After addition of this silver nitrate solution, the solution was left unstirred
and the silver content in the supernatant fluid was measured (by the atomic absorption
spectrophotometric technique, also called "AAS") as a function of time.
Table 3
| Composition of the test developer |
| Components of developer |
Amount |
| Demineralized water |
400 ml |
| Potassium metabisulfite |
23 g |
| Hydroxyethyldiphosphonic Acid (60%) |
0.9 ml |
| Trilon B |
4 ml |
| Sodium erythorbate.aq |
61.5 g |
| Potassium bromide |
1 g |
| Potassium thiocyanate |
1 g |
| Polyglycol 400 |
20 ml |
| 2-Methyl-benztriazole |
30 mg |
| 4,4' -hydroxymethyl-methyl-1-phenyl-3 -pyrazolidine-1-one |
2 g |
| Potassium carbonate |
125 ml |
| Demineralized water |
400 ml |
| Acetic acid |
11.5 ml |
| Demineralized water up to |
1000 ml |
| Density of the test developer: 1.217; pH=9.65. |
[0079] Following Table 4 lists the measured silver levels in the supernatant fluid and compares
the results with a similar experiment, where no complexant was added to the developer.
Table 4
| Time |
Silver concentration AAS (mg/l) |
| |
0 mg/l of compound CC-2 |
250 mg/l of compound CC-2 |
| 1 week |
<1.0 |
17.1 |
| 3 weeks |
<1.0 |
14.0 |
| 6 weeks |
<1.0 |
3.4 |
| 9 weeks |
<1.0 |
<1.0 |
[0080] As is clear from the results in Table 4 the complexing agent has a strong influence
on the level of silver precipitation. Complexing agent C-2 stabilizes the silver ions
present in the developer for a period of approximately 3 weeks. After 3 weeks silver
starts to precipitate and starts to cause sludge formation.
[0081] In the developer without complexing agent silver is already precipitated after 1
day (visual observation). After 1 week all silver has been precipitated.
[0082] Obviously a strong difference exists in the time after which a silver precipitate
is formed in the absence or in the presence of a useful complexing agent for silver
ions as the one according to the formula C-2 hereinbefore.
Example 2
[0083] Complexing agents suitable for use in the developer composition according to the
present invention have been tested, according to the procedure described above. The
results are listed in Table 5 hereinafter.

[0084] Comparative examples without solubilizing group the formulae or which have been represented
above do not show a significant improvement with respect to the "complex stability
ratio" if compared with a reference sample without complexing agents (----). Introduction
of suitable stabilizing groups clearly improves the stability of silver ions present
in the developer.
Example 3
[0085] An experiment similar to the experiment in Example 1 was performed. In this case
however amounts of silver and complexing agent were varied. The silver concentration
in the silver nitrate solution was varied from 0.0005 mole/l up to 0.0040 mole/l,
resulting in a total amount of silver added from 15 to 120 mg/l. The concentration
of complexing agents was varying from 0 to 2000 mg/liter. As preferred complexing
agent use was always made from compound C-1.

The Table 6 lists the concentration of the silver nitrate solution, the total amount
of silver added (in mg/l), the amount of complexing agent C-1 added (in mg/l) and
the molar ratio of complexing agent to silver. In the said Table 6 also the amount
of silver measured in the supernatant fluid after 3 weeks and the relative procentual
amount of silver in the solution after 3 weeks has been summarized. When the relative
amount is close to 0, all silver has been precipitated.
[0086] When the relative amount is close to 100%, this means that all silver ions are still
in solution (only a limited amount or even no precipitation has taken place). As appears
from the Table 6, the molar ratio of complexing agent to silver must be larger than
a factor of 5 (for the time of 3 weeks as set forth hereinbefore). The smaller the
ratio, the less stable is the solution. If the ratio of complexing agent to silver
is higher than 10, the stability is much better.
Table 6
| [AgNO3] (molar) |
[Ag]St (molar) |
CC-1 (molar) |
CC-1/Ag |
[Ag] (3 weeks) |
% rest (3 weeks) |
| 0.0005 |
0.14 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
3 |
| 0.0020 |
0.56 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
1 |
| 0.0040 |
1.11 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
0 |
| 0.0005 |
0.14 |
0.51 |
3.6 |
8.8 |
59 |
| 0.0010 |
0.28 |
0.51 |
1.8 |
0.6 |
2 |
| 0.0020 |
0.56 |
0.51 |
0.91 |
0.5 |
1 |
| 0.0005 |
0.14 |
1.27 |
8.5 |
15.2 |
101 |
| 0.0020 |
0.56 |
1.27 |
2.3 |
8.5 |
14 |
| 0.0005 |
0.14 |
3.30 |
23.6 |
15.2 |
101 |
| 0.0010 |
0.28 |
3.30 |
11.8 |
30.2 |
101 |
| 0.0020 |
0.56 |
3.30 |
5.9 |
51.4 |
86 |
| 0.0040 |
1.11 |
3.30 |
3.0 |
8.3 |
7 |
| 0.0020 |
0.56 |
5.1 |
9.1 |
61.1 |
102 |
| 0.0040 |
1.11 |
5.1 |
4.6 |
123.1 |
103 |
| 0.0020 |
0.56 |
6.6 |
11.8 |
59.0 |
98 |
| 0.0040 |
1.11 |
6.6 |
6.0 |
112.5 |
94 |
| 0.0040 |
1.11 |
10.2 |
9.2 |
122.9 |
102 |
[0087] As is clear from the Table the molar ratio of complexing agent to silver should preferably
exceed a value of 5:1. The lower this value the less stable the solution with the
silver complexing agent.
Example 4
[0088] A tabular {111} silver chloroiodide emulsion was prepared as follows, starting from
the solutions given hereinafter:
-3 l of a dispersion medium (C) containing 0.444 moles of sodium chloride, 15 g of
inert gelatin and 270 mg of adenine; temperature was established at 45 °C and pH was
adjusted to 5.5;
-a 2.94 molar silver nitrate solution (A);
-a solution containing 4.476 moles of sodium chloride and 420 mg of adenin (B1).
[0089] A nucleation step was performed by introducing solution A and solution B1 simultaneously
in dispersion medium C both at a flow rate of 30 ml/min during 30 seconds. After a
physical ripening time of 15 min during which the temperature was raised to 70 °C
and 97.5 g of gelatin and 1500 ml of water were added and the mixture was stirred
for an additional 5 minutes. Then a growth step was performed by introducing by a
double jet during 66 minutes solution A starting at a flow rate of 7.5 ml/min and
linearly increasing the flow rate to an end value of 37.5 ml/min, and solution B1
at an increasing flow rate as to maintain a constant mV-value, measured by a silver
electrode versus a saturated calomel electrode (S.C.E.), of +92 mV. In order to get
an average iodide content in the {111} tabular silver chloroiodide crystals of 1.3
mole % a further amount of 0.8 mole % of iodide was added at the end of the preparation
stage by addition of a KI-solution. A {111} tabular silver chloroiodide emulsion was
thus obtained the average equivalent circular crystal diameter of which was 1.25 µm
and the average thickness of which was 0.17 µm.
[0090] To this dispersion medium an amount of 1.25 mmole per mole of silver chloride was
added of the dye anhydro-5,5'-dichloro-3,3'-bis (n-sulphobutyl)-9-ethyloxacarbocyanine
hydroxide. After cooling to about 40 °C the pH value of the said dispersing medium
was adjusted to a value of 3.0 with sulphuric acid, and after the addition of 55.5
ml of polystyrene sulphonic acid the obtained flocculate was decanted and washed three
times with an amount of 6 l of demineralized water in order to remove the soluble
salts present.
[0091] Chemical ripening agents were gold thiocyanate, sodium thiosulphate as a source of
sulphur and toluene thiosulphonic acid was used as predigestion agent. The amounts
of each chemical ripening were optimized in order to obtain an optimal fog-sensitivity
relationship after 2 hours at 57°C.
[0092] Before coating each emulsion was stabilized with 1-p-carboxyphenyl-5-mercaptotetrazole
and after addition of the normal coating additives the solutions were coated simultaneously
together with a protective layer containing 1.3 g gelatine per m
2 per side on both sides of a polyethylene terephthalate film support having a thickness
of 175 µm.
[0093] The resulting photographic material contained per side an amount of silver halide
corresponding to 4.5 grams of AgNO
3 per m
2 and an amount of gelatin corresponding to 3.55 g/m
2.
[0094] Samples of these coatings had been exposed with green light of 540 nm during 0.1
seconds using a continuous wedge and had been processed during the 98 seconds cycle
described hereinbefore.
[0095] The density as a function of the light dose was measured and therefrom were determined
the following parameters:
-fog level F (with an accuracy of 0.001 density),
-the relative speed S at a density of 1 above fog (an increase of the said speed with
a factor of 2 gives a speed value that is 0.30 lower as the relation is logarithmic
and as less light is needed to get the desired density),
-the contrast expressed as gradation G, calculated between the densities 0.25 and
2.0 above fog,
-the maximum density DMAX
[0096] The processing was run in the the test developer the composition of which has been
given hereinbefore in Table 3. To the developer, different amounts of complexing agents
were added and developing was followed by fixing in the hardener free test fixer the
composition of which has been given hereinafter in Table 7, further followed by rinsing.
The whole processing cycle was run in a Curix HTU 330 processing machine, marketed
by Agfa-Gevaert N.V. .The total processing cycle was run in 60 s at 35°C as developing
temperature.
Table 7
| Test Fixer |
| -Ammonium thiosulphate (60 % solution, wherein 1 ml comprises 0.778 g) |
710 ml |
| -Sodium metabisulphite |
80 g |
| -Sodium acetate |
130 g |
| -Acetic acid |
31 ml |
| pH ready-for-use (after dilution 1+3) |
4.90 |
[0097] From the sensitometric data given in the Table 8 hereinafter it can be concluded
that, in general, there is only a limited influence of the complexing agent on sensitometry,
even for relatively high concentrations of complexing agents the formulae of which
have been given hereinbefore.
Table 8
| Complexing agent |
amount mg/l |
F |
S |
G |
| C-11 |
0 |
0.226 |
1.67 |
3.59 |
| 50 |
0.225 |
1.70 |
3.55 |
| 200 |
0.224 |
1.72 |
3.34 |
| 1000 |
0.220 |
1.75 |
2.98 |
| C-3 |
0 |
0.219 |
1.70 |
3.58 |
| 50 |
0.222 |
1.68 |
3.59 |
| 200 |
0.221 |
1.70 |
3.51 |
| 1000 |
0.252 |
1.76 |
3.02 |
| C-1 |
0 |
0.224 |
1.70 |
3.56 |
| 50 |
0.225 |
1.69 |
3.56 |
| 200 |
0.226 |
1.69 |
3.47 |
| 1000 |
0.228 |
1.74 |
3.00 |
Example 5
[0098] In following experiment it was a goal to determine the silver elution properties
of a substance added to a specific photographic developer solution, namely for component
I-1.
[0099] 30 mg of said compound was dissolved in 150 ml of developer. The photographic developer
was brought into a 'developing tank' and was kept at 35 °C. 2 lengths of 3 m of unexposed
photographic material strips having a width of 48 mm were transported through the
developer solution at a speed of 23 cm/min. The contact time between the developer
solution and the film is 31 seconds. Samples of the developer solution were taken
after 3 m and 6 m of film strip were transported.
[0100] The silver content in the samples was determined immediately afterwards by AAS. The
silver content after 3 and 6 meters of film processing has been shown in the next
Table 9.
[0101] A similar experiment was performed in the absence of the substance under investigation.
The inhibition strength was defined by comparing the silver content with and without
the substance under investigation.
Table 9
| Film |
Silver content (mg/l determined by AAS) |
| |
Reference |
200 mg of compound I-1/l |
| 3 m |
12.5 |
2.9 |
| 6 m |
30.2 |
9.8 |
[0102] In the present Example 5, an inhibition strength ratio of 2.9/12.5 = 23% as defined
in the detailed description hereinbefore was calculated.
[0103] As is clear from this experiment the inhibition strength ratio, which is preferably
as low as possible, is about 23 %, which means that inhibition by the compound according
to the formula I-1 is about 4 times stonger than the inhibition in its absence (without
inhibiting compound I-1 the inhibition strength ratio is 100 %).
Example 6
[0104] A number of compounds classified as inhibitors was tested with respect to their inhibiting
properties, according to the method described above in the detailed description. In
the test developer the compounds showed significant inhibiting properties, as can
be derived from the data summarized in Table 10 hereinafter.

comp. 4 20.0 160
[0105] For the other chemical compounds useful as inhibitors in these experiments the structure
has already been given hereinbefore.
[0106] From the results obtained it is concluded unambiguously that introducing solubilizing
groups severely decreases the inhibiting properties or even transforms the compound
into a compound providing silver halide solvent action.
[0107] In order to be practically useful as an inhibitor it is clear that the inhibitors
may have only limited influence on sensitometry. At a concentration of 50 mg/l loss
in speed of 0.10 log E(xposure) should be considered as an acceptable limit. Results
obtained with respect to sensitometry (parameters of F(og), S(peed) and G(radation)
defined hereinbefore) have been summarized in Table 11.
Table 11
| Inhibitor |
mg/l |
F |
S |
G |
| I-3 |
0 |
0.227 |
1.68 |
3.52 |
| 50 |
0.222 |
1.73 |
3.36 |
| I-1 |
0 |
0.224 |
1.70 |
3.53 |
| 50 |
0.219 |
1.70 |
3.34 |
| I-5 |
0 |
0.225 |
1.69 |
3.62 |
| 50 |
0.226 |
1.69 |
3.42 |
| I-4 |
0 |
0.226 |
1.68 |
3.58 |
| 50 |
0.224 |
1.76 |
3.12 |
| I-2 |
0 |
0.224 |
1.70 |
3.60 |
| 50 |
0.225 |
1.71 |
3.60 |
| I-6 |
50 |
0.218 |
1.71 |
3.55 |
| I-7 |
50 |
0.220 |
1.75 |
3.58 |
[0108] From the Table 11 it can be concluded that all inhibitors classified as suitable
for use in the developer composition according to the present invention have an acceptable
influence on sensitometry.
Example 7
[0109] The silver complexing agents according to the present invention form soluble silver
complexes and are expected to show, to a certain extent, silver ion elution properties.
Said elution properties are evaluated in the same type of experiment as the evaluation
of the inhibiting properties of the inhibitors (see therefore Examples 5 and 6).
[0110] Results of the silver elution experiments are summarized in Table 12. The elution
percentage (% elution) is calculated from the formula
Table 12
| Complexing agent |
Silver content (mg/l determined by AAS) (after running 3 m) |
Percentage of inhibition. |
| C-3 |
24.7 |
198 % |
| C-10 |
26.8 |
214 % |
| C-11 |
27.1 |
217 % |
| C-2 |
57.0 |
456 % |
| ref. exp. |
12.5 |
--- |
[0111] From Table 12 it is clear that good complexing agents have good elution properties:
if compared with the percentage of inhibition in the reference experiment (ref.exp.)
those agents are outstanding.
Example 8
[0112] Example 8 shows the influence of inhibitor depletion in a situation where the processing
is performed by making use of a replenisher. In many cases where film processing is
performed in an automatic processing apparatus, fresh developer is added on the basis
of the amount of film processed (e.g. 200 ml/m2), with an optionally time and temperature
related oxidation (stand-by) regeneration.
[0113] Following Table 13 is illustrative for the sensitometric influence of increasing
concentrations of compound I-1 on the sensitometry of the material the composition
of which has been given in Example 4 hereinbefore. The material was again developed
in the test developer the composition of which has been given hereinbefore. Significance
of sensitometric data given have also been explained in the Example 4 hereinbefore.
Table 13
| I-1 (mg/l) |
F |
S |
G |
| 0 |
0.224 |
1.70 |
3.53 |
| 50 |
0.219 |
1.70 |
3.34 |
| 200 |
0.234 |
1.79 |
2.01 |
| 500 |
0.192 |
>3.00 |
|
[0114] The inhibitors clearly tend to show larger sensitometric effects than the complexing
agents in particular for concentrations above 200 mg/l.

[0115] In this replenishment experiment wherein an appreciable amount of inhibitor was present
(180 mg/l of inhibitor compound I-1) it has surprisingly been established that no
expected remarkable decrease of the linear contrast or gradation G appears in the
sensitometric curve as long as the inhibitor concentration does not rise to 200 mg/l
or more. An explanation of the observed effect may be a selective depletion in the
developer solution of the said inhibitor. Following Table 14 represents the sensitometric
data resulting from a long-term experiment. In that experiment 120 m2 of film was
processed in a prototype processor which was improved for developer oxidation and
evaporation. The developer in the tank before film processing took place was the test
developer described hereinbefore with addition of 100 mg/1 of compound I-1 (starter
developer). The processed film material was the same material as described hereinbefore.
The developer replenisher solution had the same composition as the developer apart
from a higher pH (10.25 instead of 9.65) and for the presence of extra 180 mg/l of
compound I-1, with a replenishing rate of 165 ml/m2.
Table 14
| Number of m2 |
F |
S |
G |
| start |
0.265 |
1.53 |
3.38 |
| 5 |
0.257 |
1.53 |
3.58 |
| 10 |
0.253 |
1.54 |
3.58 |
| 20 |
0.250 |
1.54 |
3.43 |
| 30 |
0.255 |
1.55 |
3.52 |
| 40 |
0.268 |
1.56 |
3.40 |
| 60 |
0.283 |
1.57 |
3.16 |
| 80 |
0.259 |
1.58 |
3.07 |
| 100 |
0.261 |
1.60 |
3.13 |
| 120 |
0.271 |
1.59 |
3.05 |
[0116] On the basis of sensitometric data in fresh developers, one would expect a decrease
of the contrast by addition of 180 mg/l of compound I-1 in a fresh starting developer
even up to a value of about 2.00. Surprisingly this decrease does not take place and
contrast does not decrease to a value below 300. This is probably caused by a selective
depletion of concentration of compound I-1 in the developer solution. After analysis
of the developer with respect to the amount of compound I-1 this was confirmed as
has been shown in Table 15.
Table 15
| m2 of processed film |
Compound I-1 (mg/l) in developer in tank |
| starting solution |
100 |
| 5 |
79 |
| 20 |
63 |
| 40 |
33 |
| 80 |
33 |
| 120 |
25 |
[0117] Although the concentration in the replenishing solution was 180 mg/l, the actual
concentration in the steady state developer was appreciably lower (25 mg/l).
Example 9
[0118] This example shows that a combination of a complexing agent and an inhibitor perform
better when both of them are present. In this example the inhibition experiment was
performed using the test developer containing moreover a combination of complexing
agent C-1 and inhibitor I-3.
[0119] Sample 1 should be considered as comparative example as no complexing agent and no
inhibitor were added.
[0120] In the development of samples 2 and 3, only inhibiting or complexing agent are added
respectively and as such also these examples should be considered as comparative examples.
[0121] Silver levels were measured immediately after processing. The sludge level was visually
examined, immediately after the processing. Samples having cloudiness or precipitation
are judged to be
not O.K. (indicated in the Table 16 as "NOK"); samples having no sludge are considered
to be "OK".
[0122] It is clear from the said Table 16 that, in particular, a combination of a complexing
agent (C-1) and art inhibitor (I-3) perform well with respect to the prevention of
silver sludge.
Table 16
| Sample No. |
|
I-3 (mg/l) |
C-1 (mg/l) |
Silver level (mg/l) |
Sludge |
| 1 |
comp |
0 |
0 |
30.2 |
NOK |
| 2 |
comp |
200 |
0 |
7.9 |
NOK |
| 3 |
comp |
0 |
200 |
76.1 |
NOK |
| 4 |
inv |
200 |
200 |
37.6 |
OK |
| 5 |
inv |
200 |
600 |
2.7 |
OK |
| 6 |
inv |
600 |
200 |
14.5 |
OK |
| 7 |
inv |
600 |
600 |
5.2 |
OK |
[0123] As is clear from the present experiment combination of an inhibitor compound as the
one according to the formula I-3 and a silver complexing agent as C-1 leads to an
improvement in avoiding sludge formation in the developer, the more when the silver
complexing agent is present in an excessive amount versus the amount of inhibitor.
(see low silver level for ratio amounts by weight of 3:1; as can be expected higher
ratio amounts will make perform the system even better, although higher absolute amounts
of inhibitor have a suppressing effect on silver level as well) .
Example 10
[0124] This example shows that a combination of a complexing agent and an inhibitor perform
better when they are both present. In this example the inhibition experiment was performed
making use of the same test developer as in the Examples hereinbefore and making use
a combination of complexing agent C-1 and inhibitor I-2. Sample 1 was a comparative
example, where no complexant and no inhibitor were added. In samples 2 and 3, only
inhibitor and complexing agent were added respectively and these samples should thus
be considered as comparative samples too. The silver levels were measured immediately
after processing. The sludge level was visually judged immediately after the processing.
Samples showing sludge (cloudiness or precipitates) were judged to be
not OK ("NOK") as has been made clear in the Table 17.
Table 17
| Sample No. |
|
I-2 (mg/l) |
C-1 (mg/l) |
Silver level (mg/l) |
Sludge |
| 1 |
comp |
0 |
0 |
30.2 |
NOK |
| 2 |
comp |
200 |
0 |
8.6 |
NOK |
| 3 |
comp |
0 |
200 |
76.1 |
NOK |
| 4 |
inv |
200 |
100 |
16.8 |
OK |
| 5 |
inv |
200 |
300 |
20.7 |
OK |
| 6 |
inv |
200 |
600 |
17.2 |
OK |
| 7 |
inv |
300 |
100 |
3.9 |
OK |
| 8 |
inv |
300 |
300 |
6.5 |
OK |
| 9 |
inv |
300 |
600 |
13.9 |
OK |
| 10 |
inv |
500 |
100 |
1.1 |
OK |
[0125] As in the previous Example 9, it appears from the Table 17 above that the
combination of an inhibitor and a complexing agent provides superior results, compared with the separate use of complexing agent or
inhibitor.
[0126] An inhibitor used separately actually makes decrease the silver content in the developer
but due to the absence of a complexing agent the (low amount of) silver readily precipitates
and gives rise to sludge formation.
[0127] A complexing agent tends to stabilize silver ions, but when too high amounts of silver
are eluted, the concentration of complexing agent is not high enough to provide enough
complexation and resulting anti-sludge action. Additional increase of the concentration
of complexing agent will further make the amount of washed out silver increase.
[0128] Sludge results after 1 week leaving unstirred the developer solutions used were judged
to be identical. Experiments wherein both complexing agent and inhibitor were used
together were OK, whereas the others were not. On the longer term of weeks and even
months it appeared that the samples 6 and 9 tend to form precipitates more readily
than the other inventive examples (which was still appreciably better than it was
for the comparative examples). It was thought that this was due to the relatively
high amount of silver in the developer, while the concentration of complexing agent
was relatively low (e.g. compared to sample 8, having a high silver level, but also
containing a higher amount of complexing agent.

[0129] It has thus been affirmed that a combination of a silver complexing agent and an
inhibitor as presented in the present Example has a positive influence on sludge formation
in the developer, even for a long period of time as presented herein.
Example 11
[0130] Preferred complexing agent/inhibitor combinations were tested in a processing experiment.
The processor used was a Fuji Cepros-P processor. The developer starting solution
was the same as the test developer given hereinbefore with in addition thereto 300
mg/l of inhibiting compound I-2 and 300 mg/l of complexing compound C-1. The replenishing
solution had following composition.
Table 22
| Composition of the developer replenisher. |
| Components of developer |
Amount |
| Demineralized water |
700 ml |
| Potassium metabisulfite |
46 g |
| Hydroxyethyldiphosphonic Acid (60%) |
1.8 ml |
| Trilon B |
8 ml |
| Sodium erythorbate.aq |
140.0 g |
| Potassium thiocyanate |
2 g |
| 2-Methyl-benztriazole |
60 mg |
| 4,4'-hydroxymethyl-methyl-1-phenyl-3-pyrazolidine-1-one |
5.5 g |
| Potassium carbonate |
175 ml |
| C-1 |
0.6 g |
| I-2 |
0.6 g |
| Density: 1.215; pH= 10.55 (adjusted with potassium hydroxide) |
[0131] 120 m2 of film were processed over a period of 2 weeks. The replenishing amount was
approximately 165 ml/m2 of a ready-for-use solution. The developer was provided as
a concentrate (1+1) in order to achieve the desired developer composition after dilution
in the processor. The hardener free fixer concentrate described hereinbefore was used.
[0132] A film material having {111} tabular silver bromo(iodide) grains was prepared as
follows. Emulsions comprising said grains were prepared as follows.
[0133] To a solution of 5.5 g of an oxidized gelatin in 3 l of demineralized water at 51°C,
adjusted to a pH of 2.5 by adding H
2SO
4, stirred up to a rate of 600 r.p.m., were added by a double jet method aqueous solutions
of 1.96 M AgNO
3 (hereinafter referred to as A1) and 1.96 M KBr (hereinafter referred to as B1): 16
ml of A1 and 16 ml of B1 were added in a time interval of 30 seconds. During this
period, the reaction mixture was maintained at 51°C. When the addition was completed,
stirring continued during 60 seconds, UAg was measured (normal value 28 mV ± 5 mV
vs. a Ag/AgCl (sat.) reference electrode and 6 minutes later, temperature was increased
up to 70°C over a period of 25 minutes: UAg was controlled again and should be in
the range from 40.1 ± 5 mV at a temperature of 70°C ± 1°C. 6 minutes later pH was
set to a value of 5.0 ± 0.3 and immediately thereafter a solution of 50 g of inert
gelatin in 500 ml of demineralized water of 70°C was added. 330 seconds later B1 was
added at a rate of 7.5 ml/min. during 148 seconds, followed during 1 minute by the
simultaneous addition of A1 (at a rate of 7.5 ml/min.) and B1 (at a rate of 7.6 ml/min.)
during 60 seconds. In a further double jet addition A1 and B1 were added during 2675
seconds at a linearly increasing rate going from 7.5 up to 15 ml/min. for A1 and from
7.6 up to 15.21 ml/min. in order to maintain a constant UAg potential of + 10 mV in
the reaction vessel. After 5 minutes A1 was added during 263 seconds at a rate of
7.5 ml/min. in order to increase the UAg value to 60 mV. At that moment a further
double jet addition was performed for 100 seconds at a rate of 7.5 ml/min., whereafter
the rate was increased linearly during 2518 seconds up to 36.8 ml/min. for A1 and
up to 36.73 ml/min. for B1 in order to hold a constant UAg potential of + 60 mV in
the reaction vessel. When said double jet addition was running 4 minutes an amount
of an emulsion, dissolved in 20 g of demineralized water at 40°C, having ultrafine
(Ca. 0.050 µm) 100 % AgI crystals was added to the reaction vessel in order to get
a total AgI content at the end of precipitation of 1 mole % vs. silver precipitated.
[0134] After a physical ripening time of 20 min. stirring was ended in the reaction vessel.
The average grain size of the silver bromoioide tabular {111} emulsion grains thus
prepared, expressed as equivalent volume diameter, was 0.57 µm, the average thickness
was 0.16 µm.
[0135] After washing, gelatin and water were added in order to obtain a silver halide content
of 236 g/kg, expressed as AgNO
3, and a gelatin content of 74 g/kg. To 3370 g of this emulsion, of which pH was adjusted
to 5.5, were added consecutively 4 ml of a 10 wt.% KSCN solution, 0.2 ml of a 4.76x10
-3 M solution of sodium toluenethiosulphonate in methanol, 18 ml of compound (V) (0.4
wt %) followed by addition after 30 minutes of 1200 ml of a 0.25 wt.% solution of
anhydro-5,5'-dichloro-3,3'-bis(n-propyl-3-sulphonate)-9-ethyl-benzoxa-carbocyanine
triethylammonium salt, 7 mg of sodium thiosulphate (0.1 wt.%), 8 ml of a 0.001 wt.%
solution of compound (IV) (2-carboxyethyl-N-benzothiazine selenide), 15 ml of a solution
containing 1.456x10
-3 M chloro auric acid and 1.58x10
-2 M ammonium rhodanide, and finally 10 ml of a 1 wt.% solution of 1-(p-carboxyphenyl)-5-mercapto-tetrazole
(compound VI) and this mixture was chemically ripened during 4 hours at 50°C. After
cooling, a preservative was added.

[0136] The film material comprising the emulsions prepared hereinbefore was prepared and
coated as follows. Before coating each emulsion was stabilized with 1-p-carboxy-phenyl-5-mercapto-tetrazole
and after addition of the normal coating additives the solutions were coated simultaneously
together with a protective layer containing 1.3 g gelatine per m
2 per side on both sides of a polyethylene terephthalate film support having a thickness
of 175 µm.
[0137] Samples of these coatings were exposed with green light of 540 nm during 0.1 seconds
using a continuous wedge and were processed The processing was run in the developer,
the composition of which has been given hereinbefore in Table 3 - see Example 1, followed
by fixing in fixer, the composition of which has been given hereinbefore in Table
7 - see Example 4, and rinsing at the indicated temperature of 35°C for a total processing
time of 60 s.
[0138] Following Table 19 represents the silver level in the developer solution in the processor
tank as well as the visually observed sludging level. From the said Table 19 it becomes
clear that even after running a substantial amount of film, there is little silver
deposit in the developer solution in the tank and sludge level is judged to be excellent
(++). Examination of the developer solution one week later is confirming the results
with respect to sludge as they remain excellent.
Table 19
| Film in m2 |
[Ag]DEV mgAg / l |
Sludging |
| 0 m2 |
0.3 |
++ |
| 1 m2 |
0.7 |
++ |
| 5 m2 |
0.9 |
++ |
| 10 m2 |
1.0 |
++ |
| 20 m2 |
1.0 |
++ |
| 30 m2 |
1.0 |
++ |
| 40 m2 |
1.1 |
++ |
| 60 m2 |
0.8 |
++ |
| 75 m2 |
0.6 |
++ |
| 90 m2 |
0.7 |
++ |
| 105 m2 |
0.8 |
++ |
| 120 m2 |
0.9 |
++ |
| ++ : excellent (= low level of sludging) |
Example 12
[0139] Following experiment was performed using the developer G135, trademarked product
from Agfa-Gevaert N.V., with the addition of 100 mg/l of inhibiting compound I-1 and
650 mg/l of complexing compound C-1. The experiment was performed according to the
description in Example 5, using non-destructive film material STRUCTURIX D7, trademarked
product from Agfa-Gevaert, having huge coating amounts of silver (symmetrical double-side
coated material coated at a silver amount, equivalent with 26 g of silver nitrate
per square meter and per side). Following Table 20 lists the silver levels after 3
m and 6 m of highly silver coated film have been processed. Without addition of complexing
and inhibiting compounds precipitation is formed in the developer within one hour
(comp.). When both compounds are added (inv.), sludging is postponed .
Table 20
| Developer |
Total silver amount (mg/l) |
Time of occurrence of silver precipitation |
| |
3 m |
6 m |
|
| G135® (comparative) |
9.6 |
19.0 |
After 1 hour |
| G135® + 100 mg I-2 + 650 mg C-1/l |
4.7 |
10.9 |
After 3 days |
Example 13
[0140] The present example is similar with Example 12. It is illustrative for a comparison
made between a material rich in silver bromide (AgBr-Film) as described in Example
12 and a material material rich in silver chloride (AgCl-Film) described in Example
4, when both materials are developed in the test developer the composition of which
has been given in the same Example 4 and wherein said developer contains ascorbic
acid as main developing agent. Additives added thereto have been given in the Table
21 given hereinafter.
Table 21
| Developer |
Ag-contents |
Sludge occurrence |
| |
3 m |
6 m |
|
| AgCl-Film (comp.) |
12.5 |
30.2 |
After 1 hour |
| AgCl-Film + 300 mg I-2/300 mg C-1/l |
1.2 |
2.4 |
> 3 weeks |
| AgBr-Film (comp.) |
7.6 |
13.0 |
After 1 hour |
| AgBr-Film + 300 mg I-2/300 mg C-1/l |
0.7 |
1.2 |
> 3 weeks |
[0141] As can be concluded from Table 21 the AgBr-film is superior with respect to sludging
if compared with the material rich in silver chloride. The addition of the preferred
complexing agent and of the preferred inhibitor provides a substantial improvement
in both cases.