Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a germicidal detergent composition. The term "germicidal"
in the present invention may mean bactericidal, sporicidal, sterilizing, germ-eliminating,
pasteurizing, disinfectant, microbicidal, germ-(, bacterium-, fungus-, bacillus-,
microorganism or the like) lethal or the like. That is, the present invention can
be applied to germs, bacteria, spores, funguses, microbes, microorganisms and so on.
Prior Art
[0002] Killing and sterilizing a microorganism such as a germ are a big subject in various
fields including a medical cure and a food industry, and many proposals concerning
them have been carried out already. For example, in JP-A 62-63504, a germicide composition
containing a cationic surfactant, an inorganic peroxide and an activator for the inorganic
peroxide is disclosed; in JP-A 3-131700, a detergent composition for a drainpipe having
its germ-eliminating and/or germicidal effect and containing each of an inorganic
peroxide, a nonionic surfactant and tetraacetylethylenediamine in a specific proportion
is disclosed; and, in JP-A 8-502047, use of an aqueous solution containing an aliphatic
peracid and the corresponding aliphatic acid in a specific molar ratio and containing
hydrogen peroxide as a germicidal detergent is disclosed.
[0003] Especially, in the case of a medical instrument and a furnishing used in a hospital,
a protective institution and so on, it is necessary to fully carry out the germicidal
deterging treatment from the viewpoint of prevention of infection and the like in
the hospital and so on. There have been known various germicides and disinfectants
using benzalkonium chloride, chlorhexidine gluconate, an iodine compound, an alcohol,
a hypochlorite, glutaraldehyde, peracetic acid, etc.
[0004] Examples of the germicidal deterging treatment using glutaraldehyde and/or peracetic
acid include that, in case of a germicidal deterging of an endoscope, a sterilizing
treatment is carried out by means of glutaraldehyde and/or peracetic acid after a
primary disinfection using a germicide of a quaternary ammonium salt type, an alcohol,
a super-oxidized water, an amphoteric surfactant, etc. and/or a deterging step using
an enzyme preparation, a neutral detergent, etc. and, if necessary, a disinfection
in an autoclave and/or a dry sterilization by heat is carried out.
[0005] However, the above-mentioned treatment takes so long time, therefore there has been
a demand for further reduction and simplification of the steps. At that time, it is
necessary that a reliable germicidal effect is obtained. Although the compositions
mentioned in JP-A 62-63504 and JP-A 3-131700 are relatively effective to common germs
and molds, a satisfactory effect by them in a simple operation cannot be expected
to viruses and bacterial spores having higher resistance against medicines. In addition,
glutaraldehyde has a problem that it generates toxic gas of aldehyde to deteriorate
the working environment and that it reacts with protein adhering to the medical instrument,
etc. to generate a firmly adhesive matters making the deterging difficult. On the
other hand, peracetic acid has a strong irritating smell and a strong oxidizing property,
therefore it is feared that the peracetic acid erodes a container thereof, a treated
matter thereby, etc. depending upon the material used therefor. An aqueous solution
containing peracid and hydrogen peroxide as mentioned in JP-A 8-502047 has the same
problem, too.
Disclosure of the Invention
[0006] An object of the present invention is to obtain a germicidal detergent composition
by which a sure germicidal effect is obtained by a simple operation and which is excellent
in safety and workability.
[0007] Then, the present invention provides a germicidal detergent composition comprising
(a) an inorganic peroxide, (b) tetraacetylethylenediamine and (c) protease at the
ratio of (a)/(b) by weight being from 10/1 to 1/2.
[0008] The inorganic peroxide (a) is preferably sodium percarbonate.
[0009] Further, the germicidal detergent composition of the present invention may preferably
comprise (d) a surfactant. The surfactant (d) is preferably at least one selected
from the group consisting of a nonionic surfactant, an anionic surfactant, an amphoteric
surfactant and a cationic surfactant.
[0010] Then, the germicidal detergent composition of the present invention may further comprises
(e) a salt of an alkali metal with an inorganic acid and/or of an alkaline earth metal
with an inorganic acid.
[0011] The germicidal detergent composition of the present invention is desirably an aqueous
solution having pH 6 to 9.
[0012] The germicidal detergent composition of the present invention may preferably incorporate
protease (c) in such an amount that the activity thereof is from 20 APU/L to 10 mAPU/L
during a time for use.
[0013] The present invention provides also a method of killing a germ, which comprises bringing
an aqueous solution of a germicidal detergent composition into contact with a microorganism
in the range of pH 6 to 9. The method of the invention treats medical instruments,
medical goods and other goods to wash and pasteurize. It is applied to a locus where
pasterization is intended.
[0014] Furthermore, the present invention provides use of the composition as shown above
for germicidal deterging or for manufacturing an aqueous solution of a germicide.
Modes for Carrying Out the Invention
[0015] With regard to the inorganic peroxide (a) used in the present invention, sodium percarbonate,
sodium perborate, etc. may be exemplified and sodium percarbonate is preferable. Then,
the ratio of the component (a) to tetraacetylethylenediamine (b), i.e. (a)/(b), by
weight is from 10/1 to 1/2, preferably from 3/1 to 1/1 and particularly preferably
from 2/1 to 1/1 from the viewpoint of the germicidal effect.
[0016] With regard to the protease (c) used in the present invention, an alkaline protease
is preferable. Particularly preferable one is an alkaline protease produced by Bacillus
sp. KSM-K16, deposited as FERM BP-3376 according to Budapest Treaty dated on 19
th April 1990 in Fermentation Research Institute as the international depositary authority,
now reorganized to National Institute of Bioscience and Human-Technology Agency of
Industrial Science and Technology, at 1-3, Higashi 1 chome Tsukuba-shi Ibaraki-ken
305-8566, Japan. For example, specified one is preferably an alkaline protease K-16
described in JP-A 4-349882, and KAP 11.1G [Kao Corp.] being commercially available
may be used. It is preferable that protease (c) is incorporated in the composition
in such an amount that the activity thereof is from 20 APU/L to 10 mAPU/L and particularly
from 10 APU/L to 100 mAPU/L. The protease activity mentioned here was measured by
the following method.
〈Method for measuring the protease activity〉
[0017] It is measured by an improved method of Anson-hemoglobin method (Anson, M. L.,
J. Gen. Physiol., Vol. 22, p 79 (1938)). Thus, a reaction is carried out at the temperature of 25°C
in pH 10.5 for 10 minutes in a solution which is prepared so as to make the final
concentration of an urea-modified hemoglobin used as a reaction-substrate 14.7 mg/mL
and, after that, trichloroacetic acid is added to the reaction solution to make its
final concentration 31.25 mg/mL. The parts dissolved in trichloroacetic acid of the
reaction solution are colored by folin-ciocalteu's phenol reagent. The degree colored
by 1 mmol of tyrosine is calculated in terms of 1APU to make its calibration curve
(or line), and then the activity per ten minutes of the reaction is determined by
the calibration curve. Then, this is calculated in terms of one minute to measure
the degree colored by the above-mentioned floin-ciocalteu's phenol reagent. That is,
1APU is the amount of protease which provides the same degree colored by the parts
dissolved in trichloroacetic acid in one minute as those colored by 1mmol of tyrosine
with the folin-ciocalteu's phenol reagent.
[0018] It is preferable that the germicidal detergent composition of the present invention
comprises (d) at least one surfactant which is selected from the group consisting
of a nonionic surfactant, an anionic surfactant, an amphoteric surfactant and a cationic
surfactant.
[0019] The nonionic surfactant includes a polyoxyethylene alkyl ether, a polyoxyethylene
alkylene ether, a polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester, an alkyl polyglycoside,
a sucrose fatty acid ester and an alkyl polyglycerol ether. Among them, a polyoxyethylene
(the average number of added ethylene oxide being 2 to 300) alkyl (the number of carbon
atoms being 12 to 18) ether is preferable.
[0020] The anionic surfactant includes a higher fatty acid salt, a higher alcohol sulfate
salt, a higher alcohol sulfonate, a sulfated fatty acid salt, a sulfonated fatty acid
salt, a phosphate salt, a sulfate salt of a fatty acid ester, a sulfonate salt of
a fatty acid ester, a sulfate salt of a higher alcohol ether, a sulfonate salt of
a higher alcohol ether, an acetate substituted with a higher alcohol ether, a condensation
product of a fatty acid with an amino acid, an alkylolated sulfate salt of a fatty
acid amide, an alkylated sulfonate salt of a fatty acid amide, a sulfosuccinate salt,
an alkylbenzene sulfonate, an alkylphenol sulfonate, an alkylnaphthalene sulfonate,
an alkylbenzimidazole sulfonate, an amidoether carboxylic acid or a salt thereof,
an ether carboxylic acid or a salt thereof, N-acyl-N-methyltaurine or a salt thereof,
an amidoether sulfuric acid or a salt thereof, an N-acylglutamic acid or a salt thereof,
an N-amidoethyl-N-hydroxyethylacetic acid or a salt thereof, an acyloxyethanesulfonic
acid or a salt thereof, an N-acyl-β-alanine or a salt thereof, an N-acyl-N-carboxyethyltaurine
or a salt thereof, an N-acyl-N-carboxyethylglycine or a salt thereof and an alkyl-
or alkenyl- aminocarbonylmethylsulfuric acid or a salt thereof. Among them, a higher
alcohol sulfate salt is preferable.
[0021] Then, the amphoteric surfactant includes an amine oxide such as an alkyldimethylamine
oxide and a betaine such as an alkyldimethylaminofatty acid betaine and an alkylcarboxymethylhydroxyethylimidazolium
betaine. A betaine is preferable.
[0022] The cationic surfactant includes an alkyl trimethyl ammonium salt such as lauryl
trimethyl ammonium chloride, stearyl trimethyl ammonium chloride and cetyl trimethyl
ammonium chloride; a dialkyl dimethyl ammonium salt such as distearyl dimethyl ammonium
chloride and a dialkyl(C
12-C
18) dimethyl ammonium chloride; an alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium salt such as an alkyl(C
12-C
14) dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride; a substituted benzalkonium salt; a mono-cationic
compound such as a benzethonium salt and, besides, a polycationic compound such as
an N-alkyl-N,N,N',N',N'-pentamethyl-propylene ammonium salt. Among them, an alkyl
trimethyl ammonium salt, a dialkyl dimethyl ammonium salt, an alkyl dimethyl benzyl
ammonium salt or a substituted benzalkonium salt is preferable. Lauryl trimethyl ammonium
chloride, stearyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, cetyl trimethyl ammonium chloride,
distearyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, a dialkyl(C
12-C
18) dimethyl ammonium chloride or an alkyl(C
12-C
14) dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride is particularly preferable.
[0023] It is preferable that the surfactant (d) is used in the amount as compared with tetraacetylethylenediamine
(b) in terms of the ratio of (b)/(d) of from 20/1 to 2/1 by weight.
[0024] Further, it is preferable that the germicidal detergent composition of the present
invention comprises (e) the salt of the alkali metal with the inorganic acid and/or
of the alkali earth metal with the inorganic acid. The component (e) includes sodium
sulfate, sodium nitrate, sodium chloride, sodium carbonate, sodium hydrogen carbonate,
magnesium sulfate, magnesium nitrate, magnesium chloride and magnesium carbonate.
Among them, sodium sulfate or magnesium sulfate is preferable. It is preferable that
the component (e) is used in an amount as compared with the inorganic peroxide (a)
in terms of the ratio by weight of (a)/(e) of from 1/1 to 4/1. Each of the salts of
the alkali metal with the inorganic acid and of the alkali earth metal with the inorganic
acid may be used solely. However, they are preferably combined and used from the viewpoint
of drying the inorganic peroxide and improving the germicidal activity.
[0025] When the germicidal detergent composition of the present invention is in a solid
form such as a powder, a granule or a tablet, it is used as an aqueous solution at
a time for use. In the case, the concentration of the organic peracid is made into
preferably 150 to 3200 ppm, more preferably 250 to 3200 ppm and particularly preferably
450 to 3200 ppm. Then, the pH of the aqueous solution is preferably 6 to 9 and particularly
preferably 6.5 to 7.5. Adjustment of the pH of the aqueous solution can be achieved
by an inorganic acid or an organic acid, and the inorganic acid or the organic acid
may be previously added to the solid composition or the inorganic acid or the organic
acid may be added to the aqueous solution. In case the acid is previously added to
the solid composition as in the former case, the rate of dissolving the acid can be
adjusted by coating the acid with a water-soluble substance such as a water-soluble
inorganic salt. It is also possible to conduct the coating by means of the above-mentioned
component (e).
[0026] The germicidal detergent composition of the present invention is suitable for germ-killing
of instruments and furnishings used in medical institutions, etc. Then, it is particularly
useful as a germicidal detergent composition for medical devices and instruments including
a device or an instrument, for an operation, such as a surgical knife, a scissors
and a surgical clamp; a device or an instrument, for a diagnosis, such as endoscope;
and a device or an instrument, for a cure, such as an instrument for blood transfusion
and a device for dialysis.
[0027] In accordance with the present invention, a germicidal detergent composition having
a high germicidal effect and being excellent in safety and workability can be obatined.
Examples
〈Germicidal detergent composition〉
[0028] The germicidal detergent compositions as shown in Table 1 were prepared and used
in the following Examples and Comparative Examples.

Examples 1 to 6 and Comparative Examples 1 to 2
[0029] The compositions as shown in Table 1 were diluted stepwise by a sterilized water
into 0.5 to 0.01 % by weight to make preparations. Protease [KAP11.1G, manufactured
by Kao Corp.] was added into each of the preparations to make it 1APU/L and then Staphylococcus
aureus (IFO 12732, being shown in LIST OF CULTURE, MICROORGANISMS 10
TH EDITION 1996 published by INSTITUTE FOR FERMENTATION, OSAKA at 17-85, Juso-honmachi
2-chome, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532, Japan) was added in the concentration of 1.0 × 10
7 cells/mL thereto. Incidentally, all of Examples were adjusted to pH 7.0 with citric
acid. The resultant solution was allowed to stand at 25°C for 30 minutes, 100µL from
this solution were taken, 0.9 mL of a 1% aqueous solution of sodium thiosulfate was
added to inactivate the preparation, and 5µL of the resultant mixture were inoculated
on an incubating medium (200µL of an SCDLP medium) and incubated at 35°C. Then, the
minimum lethal concentration (MLC) was determined. The concentration of the produced
organic peracid in each of the preparations was 15 to 800 ppm and then the concentration
of the produced organic peracid in the preparation showing the MLC is shown in Table
2. Here, a method for quantitating the concentration of the organic peracid is as
follows (and that is the same in the succeeding Examples as well).
〈Method for quantitating the concentration of the organic peracid〉
(α) A method for quantitating the hydrogen peroxide
[0030] About 2 g of the diluted preparation are precisely weighed in a conical beaker having
its capacity of 200mL, the solution is cooled by adding 10 mL of 20% sulfuric acid
and 2 or 3 pieces of ice thereto, and then 1 or 2 drops of a saturated aqueous solution
of manganese sulfate as catalyst are added. Further, a titration is carried out using
an N/2 solution of potassium permanganate. When the solution colors in pale pink for
1 to 10 seconds, the titration is made into finish. The concentration of hydrogen
peroxide is calculated by the following Formula (1-1).
- T1:
- Amount (mL) required for the titration of potassium permanganate
- F1:
- Factor of potassium permanganate
- W1:
- Weight (g) of the preparation
(β) Method for quantitating the organic peracid
[0031] About 1 g of the diluted preparation is precisely weighed in an Erlenmeyer flask
having its capacity of 300mL and having its connective stopper therewith. Then, 10
mL of 20% sulfuric acid, 20 mL of pure water and 2 mL of a saturated aqueous solution
of potassium iodide are added thereto and the flask is tightly closed and gently shaken.
This is allowed to quietly stand in a cool and dark place for 5 minutes and then titrated
with an N/5 solution of sodium thiosulfate. When the solution colors in light yellow,
a few drops of a 2% solution of starch were added thereto and the titration is continued.
When violet color of the solution disappears, the titration is made into finish. The
concentration of the organic peracid is calculated as the concentration of peracetic
acid by the following Formula (1-2).
- T2:
- Amount (mL) required for the titration of sodium thiosulfate
- F2:
- Factor of sodium thiosulfate
- W2:
- Weight (g) of the preparation
- H:
- The concentration (%) of hydrogen peroxide calculated from Formula (1-1)

[0032] From the result of Table 2, it is recognized that the preparations of Examples 1
to 6 are more excellent in the germicidal effect than those of Comparative Examples
1 to 2.
Examples 7 to 12 and Comparative Examples 3 to 4
[0033] The following tests were carried out by using the composition of Table 1. The result
is shown in Table 3.
〈Spores for the test〉
[0034] Bacillus cereus (IFO 13494, being available in same way as IFO 12732 mentioned above) was heated
by a conventional manner and the obtained spores were used for the test.
〈Test method〉
[0035] The compsitions as shown in Table 1 were diluted stepwise by a sterilized water into
5 to 0.1 % by weigtht to make preparations. Protease [KAP11.1G, manufactured by Kao
Corp.] was added into each of the preparations to make it 1APU/L and then the above-mentioned
spores were added in concentration of the 1.0 × 10
7 cells/mL thereto. Incidentally, all of Examples were adjusted to pH 7.0 with citric
acid. The resultant solution was allowed to stand at 25°C for 30 minutes, 100µL from
this solution were taken, 0.9 mL of a 1% aqueous solution of sodium thiosulfate was
added to inactivate the preparation, and 5µL of the resultant mixture were inoculated
on an incubating medium (200µL of an SCDLP medium) and incubated at 35°C. Then, the
minimum lethal concentration (MLC) was determined. The concentration of the produced
organic peracid in each of the preparations was 150 to 10000 ppm and then the concentration
of the produced organic peracid in each of the preparations showing the MLC is shown
in Table 3.

[0036] From the result of Table 3, it is recognized that the preparations of Examples 7
to 12 are more excellent in the sporicidal effect than those of Comparative Examples
3 to 4.
Examples 13 to 24 and Comparative Examples 5 to 8
[0037] The following tests were carried out using the compositions of Table 1. The result
is shown in Tables 4 and 5.
〈Viruses for use〉
[0038]
① Poliovirus: poliovirus type 3, vaccinal strain (Sabin strain)
② Herpes simplex virus: HF strain
Here, FL cells were used for measuring the growth of the virus and the infection value
with the virus.
〈Test method〉
[0039]
① Each of the compositions as shown in Table 1 was diluted with a sterilized water
to the concentration as shown in Tables 4 and 5 to prepare the preparations for the
poliovirus and for the herpes simplex virus.
② Each of the preparations was mixed with protease [KAP11.1G, manufactured by Kao
Corp.] to make it 1 APU/L. Incidentally, all of Examples were adjusted to pH 7.0 with
citric acid. The concentration of the produced organic peracid in each of the preparations
was 160 to 3200 ppm for Examples 13 to 24 and 210 to 3500 ppm for Comparative Examples
6 and 8. No organic peracid was produced in Comparative Examples 5 and 7.
③ 50µL of the protease-containing preparation were mixed with 50µL of a virus solution.
④ The resultant mixture was allowed to stand at 25°C for 30 minutes and then 50µL
of a 2% aqueous solution of sodium thiosulfate were added thereto.
⑤ The resultant solution as a mixed system of the above-mentioned 3 components was
diluted stepwise at the interval of 10-fold to measure the infection value with virus.
Incidentally, 50µL of a 2% aqueous solution of sodium thiosulfate were added to 50µL
of the preparation containing no protease, the resultant mixture was allowed to stand
for 30 minutes and then 50µL of a virus solution was added thereto to prepare a virus
control.


[0040] From the result of Tables 4 and 5, it is recognized that the preparations of Examples
13 to 24 are more excellent in the inhibitory property from both infections with poliovirus
and with herpes simplex virus than those of Comparative Examples 5 to 8.
Examples 25 to 30 and Comparative Examples 9 to 22
〈Preparation of the test pieces〉
[0041] A dirt model by protein (a 30% aqueous solution of a skim milk) is applied on a piece
of SUS 304 cut into the size of 2 cm × 3 cm, and modified by heating at 110°C for
2 hours. Then, 100µL of spores (1.0 × 10
7 spores/mL) of
Bacillus cereus (IFO 13494) are applied thereon to obtain a test piece.
〈System for the test〉
① System 1 for the test (a system to which no protease was added)
[0042] Using the preparations which were prepared by diluting the compositions of Table
1 directly to the concentrations shown in Table 6, the following tests were carried
out. All of Comparative Examples were adjusted to pH 7.0 with citric acid except those
using the compositions a and b. Then, the concentration of the produced organic peracid
in each of the preparations was 240 to 2500 ppm for Comparative Examples 10 to 16.
For Comparative Example 9, no organic peracid was produced.
② System 2 for the test (a system to which protease was added)
[0043] The composition of Table 1 was mixed with protease [KAP11.1G, manufactured by Kao
Corp.] to make it 1 APU/L, the resultant mixture was diluted to the concentration
as shown in Table 6. Using the resultant preparation, the following tests were carried
out. All of Examples and Comparative Examples were adjusted to pH 7.0 with citric
acid except those using the compositions a and b. Then, the concentration of the produced
organic peracid in each of the preparations was 240 to 450 ppm for Examples 25 to
30 and 2500 to 3000 ppm for Comparative Examples 18 to 19. For Comparative Examples
17 and 20 to 22, no organic peracid was produced.
〈Test method〉
① Germicidal evaluation
[0044] A test piece was dipped for 30 minutes in 10 mL of each of the preparations and then
the surface of each of the test pieces was washed with 2 mL of a 1% aqueous solution
of sodium thiosulfate. In case there were residual protein components, they were physically
peeled off and dispersed in 2 mL of a 1% aqueous solution of sodium thiosulfate. 5
µL from this solution were taken and inoculated on an incubating medium (200µL of
an SCDLP medium) whereupon the germicidal effect was evaluated.
② Detergent evaluation
[0045] A test piece was dipped for 30 minutes in 10 mL of each of the preparations and then
the residual protein components were dyed with erythricin B. The evaluation was carried
out according to the following criteria.
- ○:
- Completely washed (not dyed)
- △:
- Incompletely washed (dyed areas were noted)
- X:
- Rarely washed (almost whole areas were dyed)
