Background of the Invention
[0001] At the present time, golf balls are manufactured using various materials for cores,
inner cores, outer covers and covers. These materials are each of a different density
and thus, if they are not perfectly centered about one another, there can be a heavy
side and a light side to the ball. If a straight line is drawn between the light and
heavy points in a golf ball, and this line is parallel to the desired direction of
travel, then when striking the ball towards the target, the ball's travel will be
true and straight to the target. If this imaginary line is perpendicular to the target
and the ball is struck towards that target, then the ball's travel will veer slightly
in the direction of the heavy side of the ball.
[0002] Golf balls currently are usually made of a core comprised of polybutadiene and a
zinc monomer material with a total typical density of 1.18 grams per cubic centimeter.
The golf ball core thus formed is centerless ground to achieve near perfect roundness.
The next is the most difficult step and that is to center this core in the final mold
and keep it centered while the cover material is injection molded around the core.
This is usually done by using retractable steel pins in the mold. The extremely high
injection pressure and viscosity of the cover material creates very high pressures
on the core and even with steel pins, movement is almost impossible to avoid. Thus,
it is not unusual to see differences of cover thickness of 0.005 inches to 0.020 inches
from one side of the ball to another. In fact a standard inspection method in golf
ball production is to x-ray or cross section balls to note differences in cover thickness.
This produces a heavy side and a light side to the ball with the attendant disadvantages
mentioned above.
[0003] Low-cost, one-piece balls have long been manufactured for driving ranges and these
are thought to be weight balanced. However, compromises are made to the material of
construction and thus the balls distance performance and "feel" is generally recognized
as inferior. Because of the poor performance, these balls are not generally sold to
the general public. Around the turn of the century, one piece balls were also manufactured
but again their performance did not compete with multi-material constructed balls
introduced later.
Brief Summary of the Invention
[0004] This invention involves: (1) making one or more covering layers of the golf ball
of the same density as the "standard" core material (1.18gm/cc) ― resulting in a ball
that is heavier than the standard, but weight balanced; (2) making the cover heavier
and the core lighter (for example, both 1.13gm/cc) ― resulting in a ball of the desired
weight and properly weight balanced; and (3) making the core lighter, matching the
density of a typical cover material (0.99gm/cc) resulting in a ball that is lighter
than the standard, but properly weight balanced. Thus, if there are variations of
thickness of the layer or layers of materials surrounding the core because of the
difficulties of injection molding, such thickness differences will have no effect
on the balance of the golf ball.
[0005] It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a multi-layer golf ball which
will have improved characteristics and it is a further object of this invention to
provide a multi-layer golf ball which has uniform density throughout.
[0006] This, together with other objects of the invention, will become apparent from the
following detailed description of the invention and the accompanying drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0007]
Figure 1. A perspective view of conventional golf ball.
Figure 2. A cross section of a conventional golf ball in which the core 10 and the
outer layer 11 are perfectly centered.
Figure 3. A cross section of a typical golf ball in which the core 10 has an outer
layer 11 which is thicker on the right side of the core than the left side.
Figure 4. A cross section of a typical multi-layer golf ball in which the core 10
has outer layers 11 and 12 which are thicker on the right side than on the left side.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0008] Figure 1 is a perspective view of a conventional golf ball. Figure 2 is a cross section
of a conventional golf ball in which the core 10 and the outer layer 11 are perfectly
centered. Figure 3 is a cross section of a typical golf ball in which the core 10
has an outer layer 11 which is thicker on the right side of the core than the left
side. Figure 4 is a multi-layer golf ball wherein the layers 11 and 12 are thicker
on the right side than on the left side.
[0009] Applicant's invention preferably involves making the density of the core material
and the density of the cover materials the same. For example, utilizing a core having
a density of 1.13 gm/cc, the initial layer and each succeeding layer can be constructed
of suitable materials that have been formulated with constituents that bring the density
of the layer to exactly match the 1.13 gm/cc of the core. In this manner, assuming
the finished ball is perfectly spherical, it is not critical that the cover and core
be concentric since the ball will always be perfectly balanced.
[0010] Currently, golf balls with off center weight as a result of the difficulties of manufacturing
are the norm. Applicant recently tested over 12 dozen balls from leading domestic
manufacturers. There was not one ball that was perfectly centered. A putting robot
was used and as many as 49 out of 50 twelve foot robotic putts missed the hole due
to rolling off line caused by lack of weight centering. Based on the putting tests
that had been concluded, it is projected that a 250 yard drive would be effected by
as much as 36 feet deviation from the intended target.
[0011] In contrast utilizing golf balls based on Applicant's invention and using a robotic
putter at the same 12 foot distance, 43 out of 50 putts were sunk in the hole. Furthermore,
it is reasonable to expect that similar results are to be realized using drivers and
irons hitting balls a much greater distance.
[0012] In addition, in manufacturing a golf ball according to Applicant's invention, it
is not necessary to utilize the centerless grinding operation and this results in
lower cost.
[0013] While this invention has been shown and described with respect to a detailed embodiment
thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in
form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the scope of the claims
of the invention.
1. A golf ball comprising
a spherical core,
one or more layers of material completely covering said core
wherein the density of the core and the density of said one or more layers surrounding
said core are essentially identical
2. The golf ball of Clam 1 wherein said core has been prepared by centerless grinding.
3. The golf ball of Claim 1 wherein said core is a blend of polybutadiene and a zinc
monomer.
4. The golf ball of Claim 1 wherein said core is completely covered by at least one layer
of a suitable material which contains density altering constituents so that its density
is essentially identical to the density of said core.
5. The golf ball of Claim 1 wherein said core is covered by one or more layers of a material
selected from the group consisting of urethane, balata, and an ionomer resin or any
combination of these materials, which have been modified with density altering constituents
such that the density of the core, said one or more layers, and the complete ball
will be essentially the same.