[0001] The present invention relates to railcar bogie assemblies and more specifically to
the lands between the side frames and bolster of a railcar bogie assembly. Particularly,
at each intersection of the side frames with the bolster adjacent to the friction
shoe wear plate interface, the facing lands are assembled at a gap separation distance
of less than four-tenths inch (10.16mm). Assembly of the bogie with this restriction
provides an inhibition to bogie warping with consequent improvement of bogie hunting
and curving performance during railcar operation. However, it also induces frequent
wearing contact between the sideframe column surface and the bolster stop surface.
[0002] In earlier railcar bogie assemblies, wide laterally extending stop surfaces or lands
adjacent to the side frame wear plate and bolster friction shoe pocket have been provided
to avoid rotation of the bolster about its longitudinal axis, that is bolster rotation.
In the railcar bogie assemblies, each side frame has a longitudinal axis parallel
to the truck longitudinal axis, which intersects and is normal to the bolster longitudinal
axis at an as-assembled condition. Rotation of the bolster about its central vertical
axis causes angular displacement of the intersection of the side frame and bolster
longitudinal axes from their perpendicular, as-assembled state, and this action is
considered to be bogie warping. In the case of railcar bogie warp, greater clearance
between the sideframe and bolster at their intersection aggravates bogie warp causing
the wheel flanges to attack the rail at a relatively severe angle during curving,
thus inducing excessive lateral forces. Further, if this sideframe-bolster clearance
is too great, bogie assembly hunting may be aggravated.
[0003] Railcar bogie hunting is a continuous instability of a railcar wheel-set where the
bogie weaves down the track in an oscillatory fashion, usually with the wheel flanges
striking against the rail, creating wheel drag and increased lateral forces on the
rail. A related condition referred to as lozenging is an unsquare condition of the
side frames and bolster, and it occurs where sideframes operationally remain parallel
to each other, but one sideframe moves slightly ahead of the other in a cyclic fashion;
this condition is also referred to as parallelogramming or warping. Warping results
in wheel misalignment with respect to the track; it is more pronounced on curved track
and usually provides the opportunity for a large angle-of-attack to occur. The displacement
or rotation of the bolster about the bolster vertical axis, which is accompanied by
angling of its longitudinal axis relative to the side frame, is indicative of railcar
bogie warping. The concept of bogie hunting, that is a high-speed dynamic instability
of the railcar wheel sets is manifested by the parallelogramming or lozenging of the
bogie. Further, bogie hunting is also a consequence of the lack of warp stiffness.
[0004] Wide stop surfaces on the bolster lands were provided to inhibit rotation of the
bolster in the side frame and to avoid the cited bolster rotational problems about
its longitudinal axis; to permit as-cast surfaces to function properly; and, to avoid
the wearing or eroding of the contacting surface edges between the bolster and the
columns of the side frame bolster opening.
[0005] The earlier practice of a narrow-land structure with a wide separation between the
bolster land and side-frame, column-face land is illustrated in U.S. Patent No. 2,378,415
to Light. In this patent, inboard and outboard column guide gibs are provided on the
bolster for engagement with the inboard and outboard surfaces on the adjacent column.
The outboard gibs in this structure have less depth than the widened portion of the
bolster opening. A similar gib arrangement is taught in U.S. Patent No. 2,422,201
to Lehrman. The significant separation distances between the side frame column and
the bolster are clearly discernible in the plan views of the figures of these patents.
[0006] A technical study of a number of railcar derailments between 1988 and 1992 was conducted
by a task force composed of representatives from five railroads, three railcar builders,
three bogie manufacturers, a major shipper, a major railcar fleet owner, as well as
other component suppliers and technical consultants. The task force was to determine
the cause of the derailments and to recommend both long-term and short-term solutions
for derailment prevention. The results of the study are reported in Final Report,
Testing, Evaluation & Recommendations Curving Performance of 125T DS Cars by Rail
Sciences Inc.(RSI), Atlanta, Georgia, February 12, 1993. One of the parameters considered
in the bogies was warp restraint, and as a consequence of the research it was determined
that one of the five simultaneously occurring factors leading to the derailments being
reviewed was 'warping of sideframe-bolster due to low truck warp restraint'. One of
the consequent long-term proposals resulting from the test determinations was to advocate
the development and application of bogie warp stiffening techniques. A principal finding
of the study was that frame stiffening arrangements increase the warp restraint of
the bogies and reduce lateral forces in curving. In addition, it was concluded that
the studied derailments were the result of high lateral forces rolling the low rail
or increasing total gage sufficient to allow a wheelset to drop in. One of the noted
causes of these high lateral forces was warping of the sideframe-bolster combination
due to low bogie-warp restraint caused by the presence of resilient bearing adapter
pads and a lack of friction wedge restraint. There were a plurality of other findings
and conclusions from this study, which were noted in this report, however, the present
invention only addresses the warping restraint within the railcar bogie.
[0007] U.S. Patent no. 4,274,340 to Neumann et al. specifically teaches a frictional snubbing
arrangement having inner and outer gibs, which gibs are bowed to aid in the prevention
of bolster roll and to maintain control of the bolster. There is no other known bowed
element structure in the friction shoe pocket and bolster end arrangement.
[0008] As a consequence of the more narrow gap between the contact surfaces there is more
friction and wear between the surfaces during the operation of the railcar bogie assembly.
The wear on the bolster column-stop surface is the result of the contact, and also
the consequence of the ongoing effort to reduce bogie hunting and railcar warping.
The restraints or constraints on the railcar bogie produce increased contact and wear.
Therefore, suppliers of railcar bogies are continuously searching for methods and
components to reduce the wear on the bogies and bogie components to increase the bogie
or component useful life along with improved operating performance.
[0009] In one aspect the present invention provides a bolster land structure for the bolster
of a railcar bogie assembly, which land structure has been hardened to increase the
surface hardness of the contact surface. More particularly, the surface is preferably
provided with a contacting surface that has Brinell hardness between about 375 BHN
and 515BHN with an effective hardness depth of about 0.12 inch (3.05mm), which hardness
is significantly greater than the as-cast steel hardness of 137BHN to 208BHN of AAR-specified
M-210 Grade B+ steel. Preferably the surface hardness is increased by flame-hardening.
The resultant bolster surface produces a significant increase in bolster contact-surface
wear reduction when contacting the sideframe column contact surface or the wear plate
generally mounted on the column surface. This wear reduction is further amplified
in those cases where a hardened wear plate is mounted on the column wear surface and
contacts the bolster contact-surface. Although the increased hardness is directly
reflected in the improved wear life of the bolster land or contact-surface, an ancillary
benefit, or consequent result of the improved wear life is an improvement of friction
shoe wear and increase of the useful life of the associated friction shoe.
[0010] The present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference
to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is an oblique view of a representative three-piece railcar bogie assembly;
Figure 2 is an enlarged oblique view in partial section of a portion of the side frame
and bolster connection in Figure 1 at the columns of the side frame;
Figure 3 is a plan view of a side frame and bolster connection at a reference and
normal position;
Figure 3A is a plan view of a side frame and bolster connection with a column wall
and bolster wall contact surface;
Figure 4 is a plan view of the side frame and bolster connection of Figure 3 wherein
the bolster and side frame are angularly displaced from the reference position;
Figure 5 is a partial section of a plan view segment of a side frame and bolster intersection
of prior art wide land arrangements;
Figure 6 is an elevational view of the side frame column, as noted in Figure 5;
Figure 7 is a side elevational view of a representative interface between a wear plate
on a side frame column and the friction shoe;
Figure 8 is a side view of a bolster land segment noting the convex central portion;
Figure 9 is a front elevational view of a three-piece railcar bogie bolster pocket
with the flame-hardened sections noted thereon; and,
Figure 10 is a plan view of a three-piece railcar bogie at a reference or normal position
and illustrating the various moments and forces acting on such bogie assembly.
[0011] Railcar bogie assembly 10 in Figure 1 is a representative three-piece bogie assembly
for a freight railcar (not shown). Assembly 10 has first side frame 12, second side
frame 14 and bolster 16 extending between generally central openings 18 and 20, which
openings 18 and 20 in Figure 2 are between forward sideframe column 17 and rearward
sideframe column 19, of first and second side frames 12 and 14, respectively. In Figure
1, railcar longitudinal axis 34 is parallel to both first and second side frame longitudinal
axes 36 and 38. Bolster longitudinal axis 40 is generally perpendicular to railcar
axis 34 and, side frame longitudinal axes 36 and 38 at the railcar as-assembled reference
position. First axle and wheel set 22, and second axle and wheel set 24 extend between
side frames 12 and 14 at their opposite forward ends 26 and rearward ends 28, respectively,
which side frames 12 and 14 are generally parallel at a reference, as-assembled condition.
First bolster end 30 is nested in first side-frame opening 18 and second bolster end
32 is nested in second side-frame opening 20.
[0012] The connection of bolster 16 in openings 18 and 20 is similarly configured for either
of side frames 12 and 14. Therefore, the following description will be provided for
the connection of bolster first end 30 at first side frame opening 18, but the description
will also be applicable to the connection of bolster second end 32 in second side
frame opening 20. Opening 18 and bolster first end 30, which are illustrated in an
enlarged and partially sectioned view in Figure 2, have exposed bolster columns 42
and 44 between gibs 50 and 52. Friction shoe pockets are provided within bolster columns
42 and 44 with respective friction shoes 46 and 48 therein. At each end of bolster
16, friction shoe-pockets and friction shoes 46 and 48 as well as bolster columns
42 and 44 are longitudinally arranged on forward side and rearward side of bolster
16, respectively, which bolster columns also provide lands 96 noted in Figure 3A.
As bolster columns 42, 44 and friction shoe-pockets and shoes 46, 48 at each bolster
end are similar, only one arrangement will be described, but the description will
be applicable to various sets of friction shoe-pockets and friction shoes and bolster
columns 42,46 and 44,48. Bolster gibs or lugs 50 and 52 in Figures 2 and 5 project
from bolster side wall 54 and are arranged outboard and inboard, respectively, on
both the forward and rearward bolster columns 42 and 44, which gibs 50, 52 act to
maintain the position of the sideframe therebetween on either side of bolster 16 at
each side frame. Although gibs 50 and 52 are shown as relatively independent elements,
these elements may be cast or formed as enlarged protrusions of bolster 16.
[0013] The general configuration of friction shoe 48 in a friction shoe pocket provided
within bolster column 44 is more clearly illustrated in the sectional view of Figure
7 with bolster wall 60 in proximity to friction shoe sloping surface 62. Side frame
column wall 66 has wear plate 68 with vertical wall frictional surface 70 to contact
vertical surface 72 of friction shoe vertical wall 73.
[0014] Gap distance 86 is particularly shown in Figures 3A and 5. In Figure 3A, gap distance
86 is noted between side frame column wall 66 and bolster column wall 54 and in Figure
5, gap 86 is noted between land 96 on bolster column 54, and surface 92 of side frame
land 94. The specific locating point may vary with the design of the bolster column
and side frame column arrangement. However, the gap distance 86 is generally about
three-eighths inch (9.55mm) up to approximately one inch in present railcar bogie
assemblies.
[0015] In a specific prior art embodiment, the railcar bogie arrangement in Figure 5 has
separation gap 86 between projections 94 and bolster sidewall 54. However, in the
structure of Figure 5, projections 94 have a longitudinal width significantly greater
than predecessor arrangements, and this structure has been dubbed the wide-land arrangement.
This wide-land structure was intended to reduce rotation of the bolster about bolster
longitudinal axis 40 relative to the side frame, and to reduce wear on the side frame
and bolster surfaces which come into contact during service operations. In this embodiment,
surfaces 92 of lands 94 were to contact surfaces 96 of bolster 16. Lands 94 were elongated
projections on the column of side frame 12 with wear surfaces 92 closely adjacent
spaced guide surfaces or lands 96 of column 54 of bolster 16.
[0016] The angular displacement between side frame 12 and bolster 16 is illustrated in Figure
4 by the angular displacement or warp angle 98 between side frame longitudinal axis
36 and bolster transverse axis 41. In one measured arrangement, this angular displacement
was noted as 1.540. During operation, railcar bogie 10 is displaced from its reference
position with longitudinal axes 38 of sideframes 12 normal to longitudinal axis 40
of bolster 16. The angular displacement has been referred to as warping of the railcar
bogie. The forces affecting or impacting the warping characteristics are noted in
Figure 10 by the various arrows, wherein a turning moment is noted at the center plate
region of the bolster, lateral forces are acting at the ends of the bolster and longitudinal
forces are inducing steering moments.
[0017] In Figure 3, the interface between the contact surfaces of the lands, conventional
or wide-land designs or rotation stops are provided in contact with each other, or
at a negligible separation distance 86. It has been found that providing this close
proximity of the lands at the interface of bolster 16 and side frame 12 or at the
bolster columns, limits or improves warping of bogie assembly 10. In this embodiment
of Figure 3, gap or spacing 86 has been closed for direct contact between wear plate
68 and lands 96 on bolster 16. Lands 96 are formed on the surface adjacent to the
friction shoe pockets. In this embodiment, wear plate 68 extends across the width
of side frame column wall 66. However, it is noted that projections or lands 94 are
provided on either side of wear plate 68 in Figure 5, and land or front face 92 of
these lands may be coplanar with the surface 70 of wear plate 68.
[0018] Figure 3A shows the bolster column wall or spaced guide surface 96 as a continuum
between gibs 50 and 52. Similarly, vertical walls 66 of the side frame column are
each noted as a single vertical wall. In this embodiment, the utilization of a friction
shoe and friction pocket have been obviated. In a further enhancement of this embodiment,
the vertical surfaces 66 and 96 may be hardened surfaces.
[0019] Although wear plate surface 70 in Figures 5 and 7 is noted in contact with surface
96 in Figure 3, tests have noted that control of the angling between bolster 16 and
side frames 12 or 14, can be accommodated when gap distance 86 is less than four-tenths
(0.40) inch (10.16mm), and preferably closer to fifteen thousandths (0.015) inch (0.38mm).
In an experiment on a railcar bogie with the requisite reduction in gap distance 86,
the bogie warping or lateral stability of the bogies was maintained to meet AAR Chapter
XI stability criteria (0.26G rms at 70mph) for a Super Service Ridemaster® Truck Assembly
with double roller side bearings, as was another railcar truck assembly with constant
contact side bearings (CCSB). Control of the angling-warping condition in the truck
assembly by increasing the warp stiffness improves the lateral stability and reduces
the lateral curving forces at the wheel to rail interface, thereby improving the hunting
and curving performance of bogie assemblies especially in a particular freight railcar,
a bulk-head flat railcar. Limiting the gap separation distance minimizes or limits
the permitted warping angle to an angular displacement between about 0.1° (1.7 milliradians)
and 2.0° (35 milliradians). All of these attempts to control warping or bogie hunting
result in increased wearing contact between the contact surfaces of the sideframe
columns and the bolster contact surfaces.
[0020] In Figure 8, bolster land or contact-surface 96 is noted in a side view with upper
edge 110, lower edge 112 and inner gib 50. However, contact surface 96 has a bowed
or convex contour. A projected planar surface is outlined by dashed line 114, but
as indicated surface 96 includes upper tapered surface 116, lower tapered surface
118 and central surface 120. Tapered surfaces 116, 118 extend from upper surface 110
and lower surface 112, respectively, to intersect central surface 120. Tapered surfaces
116 and 118 may be of equal length, but this is not a requisite. Further, in the illustration
of Figure 8, tapered surfaces 116, 118 are longer in length than flat segment 120,
as an illustrative embodiment. The specific slope of the surfaces 116 and 118 allows
for limited movement between the sideframe and bolster 16 at the bolster pockets.
[0021] This bowed element structure provides for equalization of the travel or ride of the
sideframe relative to the bolster. Failure to provide at least a nominal degree of
freedom for travel between the sideframe and bolster would inhibit the sideframe from
following the wheelset or wheelsets in their vertical travel as the railcar progresses
down the track. Potentially wheelset 22 or 24 could literally drop out of the pedestal
jaw at forward end 26 or rearward end 28 in an extreme condition. The relative degree
of movement or freedom between the bolster and sideframe accommodates the rock between
the bolster and sideframe. This concern was analyzed in an empirical test, which relieved
the load from one of wheels 23 of a bogie assembly to analyze the impact on the remaining
wheels within bogie assembly 10.
[0022] The primary contact between bolster land 96 and sideframe column contact surface
92, or a wear plate 68 on column surface 92, is borne at central and flat segment
120. Although noted in a flat configuration, it is recognized that segment 120 may
be contoured or bowed, and thus flat 120 is not a limitation. In Figure 8, the bowed
central surface 120, which can be flat as shown, has been hardened by a flame hardening
process to elevate its temperature above a transformation temperature, and thereafter
the surface is quenched. The resultant surface hardness of the hardened region is
in the range of Brinell hardness 375BHN and 515BHN. This is significantly higher than
the as-cast regions of tapered regions 116, 118, which are generally in the range
of 137BHN to 208 BHN for AAR specified steel M-210, Grade B+. Although it is preferred
to merely harden the local region 120, it is recognized that the entire length of
land 96 could be hardened. Further, it is recognized that region could be hardened
by alternative means such as induction hardening or by provision of a hard coating
from a process like flame-spraying. The latter condition must accommodate variations
in dimensional shifts. In addition, it is acknowledged that other base materials such
as AAR Grades B and C may be used in the manufacture of the bolster or sideframe and
hardened in a similar manner.
[0023] In Figure 9, it is noted that both bowed sections 120 of each bolster shoe pockets
are hardened across the width of contact surface 96. At this elevated hardness, the
wear rate of bowed section 120 is reduced from its rubbing and frictional contact
with wear plate 68 or column contact surface 66. Wear plates 68 have a Brinell hardness
of approximately 400BHN, thus the wear rate between plate 68 and bowed section 120
is now provided at relatively equivalent and higher hardness rather than having a
high-hardness wear plate 68 rubbing on a softer surface of as-cast bowed section 120.
[0024] Further, the increased longevity of bowed section 120 helps to reduce the total load
and subsequent wear on a friction shoe, such as shoe 46, in the bolster pocket by
maintaining its conformation relative to wear plate 68.
[0025] In Figure 7, the bowed or convex shape of the friction shoe and bolster pocket are
noticeable. However, the convex region 120 of the vertical bolster contact surface
is more clearly illustrated in Figure 8. In this figure, bolster land or contact surface
96 has generally centrally located region 120 convex from base surface 96 noted by
the partial dashed vertical line 114. In the illustration, the vertical length of
the region 96 is less than one-third of the total length of bolster 1 and 96.
[0026] In Figure 9, the bolster pocket with friction shoe 46 and lands 96 are noted in a
front elevational view having both contact lands 96 and friction shoe 46. It is noted
that friction shoe face 72 contacts column surface 70 on wear plate 68 as shown in
Figure 5. In these figures, the present structure of the bolster of a railcar bogie
assembly is specified by the Association of American Railroads, AAR, as a steel alloy
with AAR specification M-210, Grade B+ with an as-cast Brinell hardness between 137BHN
and 208BHN.
[0027] The flame hardening process may utilize a natural gas, acetylene or other high-temperature
gas source. The bolster land regions 120 of each bolster pocket are elevated above
a transition temperature of about 1700°F and thereafter quenched to maintain the hardness
and underlying microstructure. Although the illustration of the increased hardness
zone in Figure 8 is noted with an uniform depth, it is recognized that there is a
gradient between the surface hardness and the hardness below the surface, which gradient
will be within the cited hardness range.
[0028] In the present case, the effective hardness has been measured to extend to a depth
of at least 0.12 inch (3.05mm) while providing a Brinell hardness of at least 300BHN
at that depth. This is an increased hardness range to provide a surface hardness better
able to resist the frictional wear from contact with column contact surface 66 or
wear plate 68, which wear plates 68 are known to have a hardness of about 400BHN.
The bolster land region is an adjunct member of the friction shoe damping structure
and avoidance of its premature wear by contact with a harder, and thus more aggressive,
surface enhances the longevity of the damping structure.
[0029] While only specific embodiments of the invention have been described and shown, it
is apparent that various alterations and modifications can be made therein. It is,
therefore, the intention in the appended claims to cover all such modifications and
alterations as may fall within the scope of the invention.
1. A railcar bogie assembly, said bogie assembly having a bolster, a first sideframe,
a second sideframe and a bogie longitudinal axis,
each said railcar bogie first and second sideframe having a sideframe opening, a forward
column and a rearward column,
each said forward column having a forward-column surface and a column stop-surface,
and each said rearward column having a rearward-column surface and a column stop-surface,
said bolster having a first end, a second end, a forward bolster side with a bolster
stop-surface at each said first and second end, a rearward bolster side with a bolster
stop-surface at each said first and second end, and a bolster longitudinal axis,
one of said bolster first and second ends mated with an opening of one of said first
and second sideframes and the other of said bolster first and second ends mated with
the opening in the other of said first and second sideframes,
said forward bolster side and rearward bolster side at each of said mated first and
second bolster ends in proximity, respectively, to a forward-column surface and a
rearward-column surface in said respective mated first and second sideframe opening,
said sideframe column stop-surfaces at said forward and rearward column surfaces in
proximity to said bolster stop surfaces, which bolster stop-surfaces are operable
to contact said respective proximate sideframe column-stop surface to maintain control
of the warp angle between said bolster end and said sideframe during curving of the
railcar bogie assembly for utilization of said railcar-bogie bolster and, first and
second sideframe to reduce hunting of said railcar bogie assembly,
said bolster column stop-surface being hardened to increase said bolster column stop-surface
hardness above an as-cast hardness to reduce the rate of wear of said bolster column
stop-surface.
2. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in Claim 1 wherein said bolster stop-surface is
hardened to a hardness between about 375BHN and 515BHN to a depth of about twelve
hundredths inch (0.021mm) below said stop surface.
3. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in
Claim 1 wherein said bolster has a stop-surface for mating contact with a sideframe
column stop-surface during operation, said bolster stop-surface being as-cast to a
surface hardness between about 137BHN to 208BHN,
said bolster column stop-surface operable to contact said column stop-surface,
said bolster stop-surface hardened to elevate said surface hardness to a hardness
between 375BHN and 515BHN to reduce the rate of wear on said bolster stop-surface
from contact with said column stop-surface and increase operational life of said bolster
stop-surface.
4. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in
Claim 1 wherein said bolster has a stop-surface for mating contact with a sideframe
column stop-surface, said bolster stop-surface hardened to a hardness between about
375BHN and 515BHN to reduce the wear rate between said sideframe column and bolster
stop-surfaces and to maintain closer clearances between said stop-surfaces to increase
warp stiffness and decrease high-speed instability in said bogie assembly over the
life-cycle of said bogie assembly.
5. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in any preceding claim having a bolster, a first
sideframe, a second sideframe and a bogie longitudinal axis, further
comprising a plurality of wear plates, a wear plate secured on each said column stop-surface,
said bolster stop-surface operable to contact at least one of said wear plate and
sideframe column stop surface during operation of said bogie assembly,
each said bolster having a top side and a bottom side,
each said bolster stop-surface having a convex region generally centrally located
on said bolster stop surface between said bolster top side and said bottom side,
said convex region hardened to approximately between 375BHN to 515BHN to increase
the wear life of said convex region,
said convex region operable to contact at least one of said sideframe column stop
surface and a wear plate on said column stop surface.
6. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in any of claims 1 to 4 having a bolster,
a first sideframe, a second sideframe and a bogie longitudinal axis, further comprising
a plurality of wear plates, a wear plate secured to each said column stop-surface,
said bolster stop-surface operable to contact at least one of said wear plate and
sideframe column stop surface during operation of said bogie assembly,
each said bolster column stop surface having a friction-shoe pocket, an inner stop-surface
and an outer stop-surface,
each said bolster inner and outer stop-surface having a convex region generally centrally
located on said bolster stop surface, said convex region operable to contact at least
one of said sideframe column stop surface and a wear plate on said column stop surface
to inhibit bogie hunting and permitting constrained generally vertical movement of
said bolster stop-surface relative to said sideframe stop-surface.
7. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in claim 6 having a bolster, a first sideframe,
a second sideframe and a bogie longitudinal axis, said bolster stop-surface operable
to contact at least one of said wear plate and sideframe column stop surface during
operation of said bogie assembly,
said bolster having a top side and a bottom side,
each said convex region being generally flat and about centrally located between said
bolster top side and bottom side,
each said stop surface having an upper tapered region extending from said top side
to said convex region, and a lower tapered region extending from said bottom side
to said convex region.
8. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in claim 7 having a bolster, a first sideframe,
a second sideframe and a truck longitudinal axis,
said generally flat region having a first length,
said upper tapered region having a second length, and said lower tapered region having
a third length, said second length and said third length being about equal.
9. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in claim 7 having a bolster, a first sideframe,
a second sideframe and a bogie longitudinal axis,
said generally flat region having a first length,
said upper tapered region having a second length, and said lower tapered region having
a third length,
said bolster defining a vertical length between said top side and said bottom side,
said first length being less than one-third said vertical length.
10. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in claim 9 having a bolster, a first sideframe,
a second sideframe and a bogie longitudinal axis,
said generally flat region having a first length,
said upper tapered region having a second length, and said lower tapered region having
a third length,
said first length being less than any of said second length and said third length.
11. A railcar bogie assembly as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said bolster column
stop-surface is hardened by flame-hardening.
12. A bolster column stop-surface as claimed in any preceding claim.