Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to the field of polishing slurries. In particular, this invention
relates to the field of polishing slurries for producing smooth surfaces for computer
hard disks.
Background Art
[0002] The typical manufacturing process for memory hard disk media involves plating an
aluminum disk substrate with a layer of nickel phosphorus and polishing the nickel
alloy to obtain a smooth and flat surface. This polished nickel alloy's surface is
suitable for the application of a hard disk's magnetic storage layer. The computer
industry's requirements for increased storage capacity on hard disk drives has necessitated
a substantial increase in areal density, i.e., data storage capacity per unit surface
area, on the disk media. This demand for hard disks with higher areal densities has
required several manufacturing improvements that include enhanced plating uniformity,
reduced surface roughness after polishing and enhanced texturing characteristics.
The polishing process is an important factor that influences many of these new requirements.
[0003] In addition to these new manufacturing requirements, significant improvements in
surface inspection methodology have allowed disk manufacturers to inspect for smaller
surface defects. This advanced inspection technology has led to optimization of polishing
parameters such as polishing time, pressure and revolution rate of a polishing machine's
upper and lower tables. Optimizing these parameters typically reduces surface defects
that can occur during polishing. This technique however requires a high degree of
expertise; and it is quite time consuming. Other advances have been made in the area
of consumables: polishing pads, abrasive slurry, and cleaning materials.
[0004] Although these techniques all reduce surface defects, surfaces with various types
of defects do result in uneven plating of the magnetic layer. For example, surface
defects on the magnetic layer such as nodules that reduce the clearance between the
magnetic head and the magnetic layer to less than 0.2 µm may damage or even crush
the magnetic head. Other defects such as scratches and pits may result in errors in
reading or writing information on hard disks.
[0005] Manufacturers have experienced limited success with eliminating errors that arise
from conventional aluminum oxide slurries. These high-tech slurries use aluminum oxide
of various surface area (5 to 50m
2/g) and size distribution (0.1 to 10 µm) as the polishing agent. Unfortunately, these
slurries' large particle sizes cause micro-scratches, micro-pits and nodules on nickel-plated
substrates' surface. There are several possible causes for these defects including:
1) the grinding action of aluminum oxide on substrate surfaces introduces polish scratches;
2) the accumulation of unwanted wastes from the oxidized substrate and nickel debris
mixed with the water to reduce the effectiveness of the injected polishing slurry;
and 3) agglomeration of the abraded debris in the pores of the polishing pads scratches
and pits the substrate's surface. In view of all these factors, it is difficult for
disk manufacturers to achieve their required smooth surface, i.e., a roughness (peak-to-valley
height) of less than 3Å or even 6Å with conventional alumina-based slurries.
[0006] Manufacturers have suggested that surface defects form primarily during the nickel
plating process. In an attempt to correct these plating defects, most proposed solutions
have increased the polishing rate to reduce or eliminate surface irregularities. For
example, chemical additives such as chelating agents and oxidizers promote oxidation
and accelerate the polishing rate of slurries. Others have used smaller or softer
alumina-based abrasive particles to minimize polish scratches on substrate surfaces.
[0007] These attempts for eliminating surface irregularities have primarily focused on increasing
the rate of chemical etching and mechanical abrasion of the nickel plated on the aluminum
substrate, for example, by applying a high polishing rate. It is however necessary
to increase the particle size of aluminum oxide in order to provide sufficient mechanical
abrasion. Unfortunately, the use of large particles also tends to roughen the polished
surfaces. Thus, it is often difficult, if not impossible, to achieve a high polishing
rate and low roughness simultaneously. Other slurry manufacturers have used strong
oxidizers or accelerators in slurries to increase the oxidizing rate of nickel plated
on aluminum substrates. These chemically aggressive slurries may, however, cause pitting
on the substrate surfaces and result in an undesirable buildup of slurry and nickel
debris in the polishing pads. An excessive build up of unwanted waste in polishing
pads leads to: defects on substrate surfaces; longer pad scraping between polishing
cycles; and reduced pad life.
[0008] Wang et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,239 disclose the use of submicron alumina for
chemical-mechanical polishing. Okajima et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,956,015 combine
α-alumina with boemite for improved polishing removal rates. As far as known, these
slurries lack the combination of removal rate and performance demanded by current
disk manufacturers.
[0009] Furthermore, there have been other unsuccessful attempts to prevent the formation
of surface defects by using smaller and softer conventional abrasives powders; these
slurries however, often form pits and nodules due to their slow polishing rates. In
addition, prior attempts to polish nickel-plated aluminum substrates include using
a silica-only slurry. For example, PCT Pat. Pub. No. 98/23697 discloses polishing
with slurries that contain 5 weight percent silica. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,819
to Kodama et al. discloses the use of fumed silica with malic acid. Finally, Kodama
et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,575,837, disclose a silica gel with a relatively strong
persulfate accelerator for increasing polishing removal rates. Although these fumed
silica processes obtain a smooth surface, their polishing rate are too slow for many
commercial applications--even when adding a large amount of oxidizers or accelerators
to the slurry. Furthermore, these slurries can become too acidic for safe handling
by operators on a daily basis.
[0010] It is an object of this invention to provide a polishing slurry for producing flat-smooth
surfaces.
[0011] It is a further object of this invention to provide a polishing slurry for disk manufacturers
to achieve a surface roughness of less than 6Å.
[0012] It is a further object of this invention to produce a smooth surface with removal
rates analogous to alumina-based slurries.
Summary of the Invention
[0013] A hybrid slurry mixture that polishes substrates' surfaces. The hybrid slurry includes,
by weight percent, 1 to 30 primary polishing particles, 1 to 50 dispersed colloidal
particles, 1 to 40 oxidizer and balance water. The primary polishing particles are
metal compounds selected from the group consisting of oxides, nitrides, carbides and
borides. The primary polishing particles have a particle size from about 0.1 to 2
µm mean diameter. The dispersed colloidal particles are at least one oxide selected
from the group consisting of alumina and silica. The dispersed colloidal particles
have a particle size from about 2 to 500nm mean diameter.
Detailed Description
[0014] The present invention includes a hybrid polishing composition containing a metal
compound as the primary polishing agent and a sol or gel of alumina or silica as the
secondary-polishing agent. Polishing with this combination of primary polishing particles
and dispersed colloidal particles improves substrates' surface characteristics and
minimizes or eliminates all surface defects. This hybrid polishing composition's bimodal
size distribution is most advantageous for polishing rigid hard disks plated with
nickel and nickel alloys such as, nickel-phosphorus alloys. It achieves a surface
roughness of less than 3Å with commercially acceptable nickel removal rates. This
hybrid slurry reduces the number of defective products and the cost of production.
When using colloidal silica, the nickel debris produced from the chemical etching
and the mechanical abrasion of the substrate surface react or adsorb onto silica particles'
surface. Thus, since polishers continuously remove the silica as a wash product, it
also removes adsorbed nickel debris. Therefore, this process unexpectedly reduces
pad scraping between polishing cycles and increases production capacity.
[0015] Effective primary polishing particles include at least one metal compound selected
from the group of oxides, nitrides, carbides and borides. In particular, at least
one metal oxides of silica, alumina, ceria, zirconia, titania provide excellent polishing
performance. Most advantageously, the primary polishing particles are alumina particles.
In particular, alumina particles predominately in the form of an alpha crystal structure
form the most effective primary particles.
[0016] The primary particle concentration in the polishing composition advantageously is
in the range of about 1 to 30 percent by weight, most advantageously, about 5 to 25
percent by weight. The primary particles have a particle diameter in the range of
about 0.1 to 2.0 µm mean diameter. Advantageously, the primary polishing particles
have a particle diameter of about 0.1 to 1 µm mean diameter and most advantageously,
about 0.1 to 0.3 µm mean diameter. The surface area of the primary polishing particles
typically have a surface area of about 4 to 100m
2/g. Advantageously, this has a surface area of about 5 to 60m
2/g and most advantageously, about 30 to 40m
2/g for effective polishing.
[0017] The dispersed colloidal particles advantageously originate from a stable dispersion
or sol of discrete particles of at least one oxide selected from the group consisting
of alumina and silica. Most advantageously, the dispersed particles are silica. Amorphous
silica forms a particularly effective colloidal dispersion. These silica dispersions
may originate from hydrolysis of silicon compounds, neutralizing soluble silicates
with acids, electrodialysis, ion exchange, etc.
[0018] The colloidal dispersion typically has a particle diameter in the range of about
2 to 500nm mean diameter. Advantageously, it has a particle diameter of about 10 to
200nm mean diameter. Most advantageously, about 20 to 60nm mean diameter for smooth
polishing with acceptable removal rates. The dispersed colloidal particle's surface
area advantageously falls within the range of about 60 to about 250m
2/g, most advantageously, about 65 to 90m
2/g. The sol or gel of alumina or silica has a solid concentration in the range of
about 1 to 50 percent by weight-it's possible to add this component directly to a
polishing slurry under agitation. Advantageously, the colloidal alumina or silica
is in the range of about 2 to 50 percent by weight and most advantageously about 10
to 40 percent by weight.
[0019] The resulting slurry also contains a chemical oxidizer, which accelerates the polishing
removal rate. Acceptable chemical accelerators include: nitric acid, nickel nitrate,
aluminum nitrate and magnesium nitrate. Advantageously, the slurry contains about
1 to 40 weight percent oxidizer. Most advantageously, it contains about 1 to 10 weight
percent oxidizer.
[0020] The advantageous blending ratio of primary alumina particles to colloidal silica
particles is about 1-to-1 to 1-to-5 by weight. Furthermore, a dilution ratio of about
three parts water to one part slurry advantageously dilutes the slurry at the point-of-use.
Final solids content at the point-of-use most advantageously ranges between about
5 and 15 percent by weight, depending on the application.
[0021] Polishing with softer and smaller particle size alumina-based slurries obtains smoother
substrate surfaces. Experimental data show that very fine alumina slurries (0.05 to
0.3 µm mean diameter) achieve a surface roughness of less than or equal to about 3.5Å.
Example
[0022] Nickel-phosphorus plated aluminum substrates of 95 mm outer diameters were polished
with a slurry consisting of three samples. Comparative Sample A (alumina only) contained:
100g aluminum oxide, 33g aluminum nitrate, 0.77g aluminum sulfate and 365g de-ionized
water. Comparative Sample B (silica only) contained 100g silica, 62g aluminum nitrate
and 108g de-ionized water.
[0023] Sample 1 contained 100g aluminum oxide, 100g silica, 33g aluminum nitrate, 0.77g
aluminum sulfate and 465g de-ionized water. Sample 2 contained: 100g alumina, 450g
silica, 33g aluminum nitrate, 0.77g aluminum sulfate and 820g de-ionized water. The
alumina of Samples A, 1 and 2 had a particle size of 0.2 µm (mean diameter) and a
surface area of 40m
2/g. The silica of Samples B, 1 and 2 had a particle size of 0.04 um (mean diameter)
and a surface area of 70m
2/g. The polisher used was a Strasbaugh 6EE--an automatic polisher that laps on both
sides. The polisher had a polyurethane-based polishing pad mounting on the upper and
lower tables of the polishing machine. The duration of the polishing cycle was 10
minutes by mutually sliding the disks and the two polishing pads under a net downforce
of 80 g/cm
2 and by injecting 350ml/min of the above-mentioned slurry between the disks and the
polishing pads. Upon completion of the polishing cycle, the disks were removed from
the polisher and cleaned in a Vtech disk cleaner to remove any residual particles
attached onto the surfaces of the disk. The weight of the disk was measured, and the
average polishing rate was determined from the reduction in weight. The roughness
of the disk was measured using a Veeco TMS 2000 laser scattering device in which the
surface measurements of 6000 points on the disk were taken to compute the average
disk roughness. The surface of the disk was also inspected visually by microscope
for various types of surface defects. The test results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Polishing Test Results |
Sample |
Al2O3: SiO2 Weight |
Polishing rate µm/min/side |
Roughness Å |
Surface Defects |
A |
1:0 |
8.64 |
3.4 |
Micro-pits and micro scratches |
B |
0:1 |
1.88 |
2.0 |
Orange-peel defects |
1 |
1:1 |
8.64 |
3.2 |
Very few micro-pits, no scratches |
2 |
1:5 |
4.83 |
2.4 |
No pits or scratches |
[0024] Hybrid Samples 1 and 2 had different water dilution ratio at point-of-use. The dilution
ratio of Sample 2 was reduced to match the polishing rate of Sample 1 in order to
compare surface quality of disks polished with these two samples.
[0025] The hybrid slurries readily produce flat-smooth surfaces having a surface roughness
of less than about 4Å. Furthermore, the hybrid slurries produce smooth surfaces with
removal rates analogous to alumina-based slurries. For example, primary alumina/colloidal
silica slurries remove electrodeposited nickel-phosphorus coatings at a rate of at
least about 7.5 µm/min/side.
[0026] Although the invention has been described in detail with reference to a certain preferred
embodiment, those skilled in the art will recognize that there are other embodiments
of the invention within the spirit and the scope of the claims.
1. A hybrid slurry mixture for polishing surfaces comprising by weight percent about
1 to 30 primary polishing particles, said primary polishing particles being at least
one metal compound selected from the group consisting of oxides, nitrides, carbides
and borides and said primary polishing particles having a particle size from about
0.1 to 2 µm mean diameter, about 1 to 50 dispersed colloidal particles being at least
one oxide selected from the group consisting of alumina and silica, said dispersed
colloidal particles having a particle size from about 2 to 500nm mean diameter, about
1 to 40 oxidizer and balance water.
2. The hybrid slurry mixture of claim 1 wherein said primary polishing particles are
alumina and said dispersed colloidal particles are silica.
3. A hybrid slurry mixture for polishing surfaces comprising by weight percent about
5 to 25 primary polishing particles, said primary polishing particles being at least
one oxide selected from the group consisting of silica, alumina, ceria, zirconia and
titania, said primary polishing particles having a particle size from about 0.1 to
1 µm mean diameter and a surface area from about 4 to 100m2/g, about 2 to 50 dispersed colloidal particles, said dispersed colloidal particles
being at least one oxide selected from the group consisting of alumina and silica,
said dispersed colloidal silica having a particle size from about 10 to 200nm mean
diameter and a surface area from about 60 to 250m2/g, about 1 to 40 oxidizer and balance water.
4. The hybrid slurry mixture of claim 3 wherein said primary polishing particles are
alumina.
5. The hybrid slurry mixture of claim 3 wherein said dispersed colloidal particles are
silica.
6. A hybrid slurry mixture for polishing surfaces comprising by weight percent about
5 to 20 alumina polishing particles, said alumina polishing particles having a particle
size from about 0.1 to 0.3 µm mean diameter and a surface area from about 5 to 60m2/g, about 10 to 40 silica, said silica having a particle size from about 20 to 60nm
mean diameter and a surface area from about 65 to 90m2/g, about 1 to 10 oxidizer and balance water.
7. The hybrid slurry mixture of claim 6 wherein said oxidizer is selected from the group
consisting of nitric acid, nickel nitrate, aluminum nitrate and magnesium nitrate.
8. The hybrid slurry mixture of claim 6 wherein said alumina polishing particles have
a surface area from about 30 to 40m2/g.
9. The hybrid slurry mixture of claim 6 having a ratio of said alumina to said silica
of about 1 to 1 to 1 to 5 by weight.
10. The hybrid slurry mixture of claim 6 wherein the slurry mixture removes electrodeposited
nickel-phosphorus coatings at a rate of at least about 7.5 µm/min/side and produces
a finished surface roughness of less than about 4Å.