[0001] This invention relates to a process and system for mixing fluids and particularly
to mixing fluids that are not readily dissolved together and fluids that have very
substantial differences in their relative viscosities.
[0002] For many years, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) has been making TYVEK®
spunbonded olefin. Commercial end uses for TYVEK® spunbonded olefin sheets have been
developed for mailing envelopes, housewrap, apparel, medical packaging and many other
uses. The process for making the spunbonded olefin has been the subject of numerous
patents including US 3,081,519 to Blades et al., US 3,169,899 to Steuber, US 3,227,794
to Anderson et al., US 3,484,899 to Smith, US 3,497,918 to Pollock et al., US 3,860,369
to Brethauer et al., US 4,352,650 to Marshall, US 4,554,207 to Lee, and US 5,123,983
to Marshall. The basic steps of this process are (1) forming a solution of polyolefin
polymer with Freon® 11 spin agent, and (2) flash spinning the solution in a spin cell.
Freon® is a registered trademark owned by DuPont. However, Freon® 11 spin agent is
a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and is believed to be a cause of ozone depletion. The use
of most CFC materials are targeted to be eventually banned.
[0003] DuPont has sought a substitute spin agent for use in the continued manufacturing
of spunbonded olefins. Unfortunately, there is not a readily available spin agent
that would be a simple substitute for the Freon® 11 spin agent. Although it has been
found that spunbonded olefins may be made using one of a number of different spin
agents, each potential alternative spin agent gives rise to numerous production process
or product quality issues. Among the alternative spin agents that have been found
for making TYVEK® spunbonded olefin are certain hydrocarbons, including pentane. An
important issue for hydrocarbon spin agents is their flammability whereas Freon® 11
spin agent is not at all flammable. The issues of flammability and explosivity are
substantial when one considers that the spin agents will be subjected to high pressure
and high temperature during the flash spinning processes. The solution provided to
the spin cell is approximately eighty percent spin agent by weight so the amount of
hydrocarbon that may be subjected to the high pressures and temperatures associated
with flash spinning is not minimal.
[0004] The solutioning system in the process for making spunbonded olefin is the portion
of the system that mixes the polymer with the spin agent to form a homogenous solution
suitable for spinning into plexifilaments. The solutioning system in current use is
generally illustrated in Figure 1. As illustrated, the system comprises a very large
drum 12 arranged to receive measured amounts of polyethylene pellets and spin agent.
The polyethylene pellets are supplied from a hopper 14 and the spin agent is supplied
from a tank 15. The drum 12 is sized to hold the pellets and spin agent for an extended
period of time (e.g. hours) and is approximately 5000 gallons (19m
3). The drum is closed and maintained at approximately room temperature and pressure.
The pellets are rapidly stirred by a rotating agitator 19 to form a uniform slurry.
The pellets and spin agent are drawn from the drum 12 into a pressure pump 21 which
pumps the polymer slurry so as to raise the slurry pressure while directing the slurry
through a heat exchanger 22 to raise the slurry temperature. The high pressure, high
temperature slurry is then provided to a dissolver tank 23 where the slurry is stirred
and mixed by an agitator 24 until the mixture becomes a homogeneous solution suitable
for flash spinning in a spin cell, schematically indicated at 25.
[0005] With the conventional solutioning system described above, there had been concern
about transient fluctuations in the ratio of spin agent to polymer which may significantly
effect the quality and properties of the flash spun product. Thus, there has been
considerable effort to blend the solution in the system in a manner that eliminates
or substantially reduces such transient fluctuations in the solution. As such, the
system provides for large amounts of the solution in both the dissolver tank 23 and
the drum 12 at any given time. A plant may spin anywhere from 2000 to 10,000 pounds
(910 to 4540 kg) of polymer per hour and the solution from which this polymer is spun
is ordinarily comprised of 75 to 90 percent spin agent by weight. Thus the conventional
solutioning process of Figure 1 requires that tank 23 hold very large amounts of spin
agent at high pressure and temperature for extended periods of time. When the non-flammable
spin agent is replaced with a highly flammable spin agent, such a large volume of
flammable spin agent at high pressure and temperature would raise serious safety concerns.
[0006] US-A-2845255, EP-A-0276608, US-A-3370796 and US-A-5087400 each disclose mixing apparatus
comprising a mixing element composed of different screw sections.
[0007] Accordingly, a solutioning system for a flash spinning process is needed that reduces
or avoids the safety concerns described above.
[0008] A solutioning system for mixing the polymer with a solvent to form a spin solution
is also needed wherein the overall solutioning system has a reduced volume of spin
agent as compared to current and conventional solutioning systems.
[0009] According to the present invention there is provided a counterhelix mixing element
for a mechanical mixing apparatus as claimed in claim 1.
[0010] The mixing element may be used for mixing at least two fluid materials wherein the
two fluid materials have substantially different viscosities. The mechanical mixing
apparatus includes a generally cylindrical elongate tube forming an outer shell and
defined by a longitudinal axis and an inner wall spaced at a generally uniform distance
from the axis. The shaft of the mixing element is arranged along the axis with the
flights attached thereto. The flights are arranged to provide substantial shear forces
on the polymer and fluid mixture while generally not differentially conveying one
of the two phases, which have a viscosity ratio of more than 10,000 to 1, causing
transient fluctuations in the ratio of spin agent to polymer.
[0011] Also disclosed is a solutioning system for mixing a polymer and a spin agent wherein
the spin agent and polymer which may be chemically compatible but are not readily
miscible. The solutioning system forms a high pressure and temperature spin solution
suitable for flash spinning plexifilaments and includes a heating mechanism for melting
the polymer and a pressure creating device for raising the pressure of the molten
polymer. The system includes a mechanical mixer having a longitudinal generally cylindrical
housing having an inner wall and a shaft mounted for rotation in the housing. A mixing
element includes flights which are arranged on the shaft to provide shear forces on
the polymer and spin agent within the chamber while not causing differential conveying
of the material in the housing.
[0012] Also disclosed is a process for mixing two fluid materials which have low miscibility
and a viscosity ratio of at least 10,000 to 1, wherein the process comprises adding
the highly viscous fluid to a mechanical mixer, adding a portion of the low viscosity
fluid, and agitating the two materials in the mixer in a first mixer section wherein
the fluids are not differentially conveyed.
[0013] Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example
only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a generally schematic view of a known solutioning system used for making
flesh spun spunbonded olefin;
Figure 2 is a generally schematic view of a solutioning system;
Figure 3 is a detailed cross sectional view of a mechanical mixing apparatus comprising
a counterhelix mixing element in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a detailed cross sectional view similar to Figure 3 of a second mechanical
mixing apparatus comprising a counterhelix mixing element in accordance with an embodiment
of the present invention;
Figure 5 is an enlarged detailed cross sectional view of a portion of the mechanical
mixer taken along the line 5-5 in Figure 3, particularly illustrating the improved
arrangement for injecting spin agent into the mechanical mixer;
Figure 6 is a cross sectional view of the spin agent injection arrangement taken along
the line 6-6 in Figure 5;
Figure 7 is cross sectional view similar to Figure 6 illustrating an alternative injection
arrangement;
Figure 8 is an elevational view of a single mixer section from the mechanical mixer
which does not embody the present invention; and
Figure 9 is an elevational view of a mixer section from the mechanical mixer comprising
a counterhelix mixing element in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
[0014] Turning now to the drawing figures, a solutioning system, generally indicated by
the number 100, is schematically illustrated in Figure 2. The solutioning system 100
is used to create a homogenous solution of polyolefin fiber forming polymer and a
suitable spin agent for flash spinning plexifilaments in a spin cell 170. The solutioning
system 100 is an integrated system in that it combines a number of components and
subsystems which cooperate to provide a high pressure, high temperature environment
for forming a uniform solution which is suitable for flash spinning plexifilaments.
[0015] As illustrated in Figure 2, the solution system 100 includes a hopper 110 for storage
and delivery of the polyolefin pellets. The pellets are provided to one end of an
extruder 120 to heat and melt the pellets. In the preferred embodiment, the extruder
120 is a conventional twin screw design including an elongate tubular pressure chamber
121 with a pair of screws 122 arranged to carry the polymer along the chamber 121
while squeezing and compressing the same. The screws 122 include helical auger-like
flights 126 on a shaft which is driven by a powerful motor 124. At the end of the
chamber 121, the polymer emerges as a continuous, molten mass of very thick, highly
viscous fluid material.
[0016] The molten polyolefin is then directed to a gear pump 130. The gear pump 130 is of
conventional design to convey a thick fluid at a range of predetermined rates. In
the solutioning system 100, the gear pump 130 pushes the molten polyolefin at a predetermined
rate through the remainder of solution system 100 and also provides the high pressures
that are required to form the homogeneous solution. From the gear pump 130, the molten
polymer is then directed into the end of a mechanical mixer 140.
[0017] The mechanical mixer 140 generally comprises a long, generally cylindrical chamber
141 with a rotatable shaft 142 extending generally along the center of the long chamber
141. A motor 144 rotates the shaft 142 which causes an array of elements attached
to the shaft 142 to mix and blend a low viscosity spin agent into the polymer. The
structure of the mixer 140 and the elements on the shaft 142 will be further discussed
in greater detail below. It is in the mechanical mixer 140 that the spin agent and
polymer are first contacted to begin forming the homogenous solution. The spin agent
is stored in a tank 115 and provided through a spin agent injection system, generally
indicated by the number 150 to the mechanical mixer 140. It should be noted that the
spin agent is added to the polymer in several successive stations along the mechanical
mixer 140 and further amounts of spin agent are provided to the polymer downstream
of the mechanical mixer in static mixer section 160.
[0018] The spin agent injection system 150 provides the spin agent through positive displacement
pumps 151 and 152 to provide predetermined flow rates of the spin agent that are in
accordance with the rate of the gear pump 130 to produce a solution with the ratio
of spin agent to polymer that is desired for flash spinning. The spin agent may be
heated (or cooled) as necessary by heat exchangers 154 and 155 prior to being mixed
with the molten polymer. The spin agent is directed to the polymer at several injection
stations 156, 157, and 158 along the chamber 141 of the mechanical mixer 140.
[0019] At the first injection station 156, the polymer and a small amount of spin agent
(relative to the amount that will constitute the final solution) are mixed together
in the mechanical mixer 140 and are moved along therein by the polymer being pushed
by the gear pump 130 into the mechanical mixer 140. As the polymer and spin agent
move along the mechanical mixer 140, they are blended to form a homogeneous solution
prior to reaching the second spin agent injection station 157. This first solution
has a slightly lower viscosity than the neat molten polymer and also achieves successively
lower viscosities as more spin agent is injected at the second and successive spin
agent injection stations 157 and 158. The solution is discharged from the opposite
end of the mechanical mixer 140 and directed to a static mixer section 160 wherein
more spin agent is added to bring the solution to a final polymer to spin agent ratio
for flash spinning.
[0020] The static mixer section 160 comprises one or more static mixers (also known as "motionless
mixers"), which in the preferred embodiment comprises three static mixing elements
161, 162, and 163. Immediately prior to the first static mixer 161 is the first in
a second series of spin agent injection stations which will be called the static mixer
spin agent injection stations 165 and 166. As noted above, the ratio of spin agent
to polymer increases and the viscosity of the solution decreases as the solution passes
each spin agent injection station. The static mixers 161, 162 and 163 include internal
structures to create a significantly tortuous path that effectively mixes the solution
as it moves through the static mixer. The internal structure is preferably similar
to designs commonly called "Koch Mixers SMX" which are available from Koch Industries
of Wichita, Kansas. A second static mixer spin agent injection station 166 may be
positioned between the first and second static mixers 161 and 162 after which the
solution may be subjected to two final mixing steps in static mixers 162 and 163.
From the last static mixer 163 the solution is provided to the spin cell generally
indicated by the number 170.
[0021] In the static mixing section 160, preferably each of the static mixers include a
mixing zone and a relaxation zone. For example, the second static mixer 162, in Figure
2, includes the mixing portion 162A wherein the solution at a particular cross sectional
plane is thoroughly mixed such that solution at the edges of the flow path is mixed
with fluid at the center of the flow path and vice versa. In the mixing portion 162A,
all parts of solution passing through the mixer tends to flow at a single rate whether
at the edge of the flow path or towards the center of the flow path. In the relaxation
zone 162B, the portion of the solution in the middle of the flow path moves faster
than portions of the solution near the edges of the flow path. Thus, by the time the
solution enters the next static mixer 163, the particular cross sectional plane of
solution entering the next mixer at any given time includes portions of the solution
of polymer and spin agent that were first mixed at a number of different times. In
the next static mixer 163, the solution is thoroughly mixed again across the cross
sectional plane of the flow path. The effect of the series of static mixers, each
with a mixing zone and relaxation zone, is to balance out slight variations in polymer/spin
agent ratios that naturally occur.
[0022] The description of the solution system 100 now will focus on some of the details
of the components and subsystems thereof so that they may be better understood. One
of the central components of the solution system 100 is the mechanical mixer 140.
The mixing of the spin agent and polymer has provided considerable challenges. First,
there is a vast difference between the viscosity of polyethylene polymer (preferred
embodiment) and a hydrocarbon spin agent. For example, the hydrocarbon spin agent
pentane has a viscosity of approximately 0.2 centipoise (cP) while molten polyethylene
has a viscosity of approximately 6,400,000 cP (1 cp equals 0.001 pascal seconds).
Second, a polyolefin polymer such as polyethylene, does not readily absorb a hydrocarbon
spin agent such as pentane. The spin agent only gradually diffuses into the polymer
rich phase. Thus, the spin agent must be well blended into the polymer or polymer
solution to hasten the formation of a homogenous solution. Thirdly, throughout the
mixing process, the solution must maintain an elevated pressure and temperature suitable
for flash spinning. Thus, the mechanical mixer 140 must effect mixing without creating
an excessive pressure drop which will cause the solution to fall below the cloud point
pressure of the solution which pressure would be unsuitable for flash spinning.
[0023] Referring now to Figures 3 and 4, two arrangements of the mechanical mixer 140 are
illustrated in greater detail. Focusing on the first arrangement illustrated in Figure
3, the mechanical mixer 140 comprises a long, generally cylindrical chamber 200 with
a drive shaft 205 running generally along the axis thereof. The drive shaft 205 is
connected to a suitable drive motor 208 positioned at the left end of the chamber
200. The chamber includes a polymer inlet 210 wherein the molten polymer is directed
from the extruder 120 via the gear pump 130 (shown in Figure 2).
[0024] A threaded seal portion 211 between the polymer inlet and the drive motor 208 is
arranged to form a seal at the first end of the chamber 200 using the molten polymer.
The threaded seal portion 211 includes two sets of counter oriented threads arranged
closely spaced from the inner wall of the chamber 200. The two sets of counter oriented
threads are each oriented to push polymer toward the other set of threads. Thus, during
operation, some of the thick molten polymer will move into the annular space between
the inner wall of chamber 200 and the counter oriented threads of the threaded seal
portion 200. The molten polymer in this annular space gets squeezed between the two
sets of countered oriented threads and the proximate inner wall of the chamber 200
thereby sealing the remainder of the chamber 200 from the drive motor. The seal at
the seal portion 211 is effective if it (1) maintains the pressure in the mechanical
mixer at a level suitable for mixing spin agent and polymer, and (2) prevents leakage
of all of the lower viscosity spin agent. As can be seen in the figures, the polymer
inlet is positioned between the seal portion 211 and the first spin agent injection
station 156 which help to keep the spin agent away from seal portion 200 and the interface
between cylindrical chamber 200 and the rotating shaft 205.
[0025] The polymer moves from the inlet 210 on through the chamber 200 along the rotating
shaft 205 to the first spin agent injection station 156 where spin agent first contacts
the molten polymer. The spin agent injection system 150 is best understood by reference
particularly to Figures 5 and 6 and also to Figure 3. The first spin agent injection
station 156 includes first and second perforated injector plates 215 and 216 mounted
to the drive shaft 205. Each of the injector plates 215 and 216 include a plurality
of holes through which the polymer mass is directed and divided into a plurality of
flows creating substantial boundary areas for the spin agent to contact the polymer.
Between the two injector plates are a plurality of injector nozzles 221, 222, 223,
and 224 which are spaced about the periphery of the chamber 200. Thus, the spin agent
is well distributed about the annular space between the shaft 205 and the inner wall
of the chamber 200.
[0026] Focusing now on the portion of the spin agent injection system 150 which carries
the spin agent to the individual injectors 221, 222, 223 and 224, the first spin agent
injection station 156 is supplied with spin agent through a common feed line 181.
The feed line 181 includes a metering valve 182 which, in conjunction with similar
metering valves at the other injection stations regulates the portion of spin agent
that is injected at each station. The feed line directs the spin agent into each of
four nozzle lines 183, 184, 185 and 186 leading to each of the four injector nozzles
221, 222, 223, and 224. Each of the respective nozzle lines includes a restrictor
valve 183A, 184A, 185A, and 186A which effectively creates a generally uniform predetermined
flow for a given pressure drop through each of the nozzle lines. The restrictor valves
enable the injection system 150 to clear a clogged injector nozzle by applying a high
pressure to the clogged nozzle to clear the clog. As a nozzle clogs, the flow through
the line decreases which in turn reduces the pressure drop at the corresponding restrictor
valve. The pressure increases behind the clog until the clog is pushed out into the
chamber 200. It should be noted that restrictor valves may alternatively be replaced
by orifice plates or capillaries or the like.
[0027] The second and third spin agent injection stations 157 and 158 are similar to the
first spin agent injection station 156 and each include four injection nozzles with
corresponding restrictor valves. Thus, detailed drawings of the second and third injection
stations are not believed necessary for explanation thereof. However, the spin agent
injection stations may be arranged in an alternative arrangement as illustrated in
Figure 7.
[0028] The second alternative arrangement of an injection station shown in Figure 7 is generally
indicated by the number 190 and includes a single sleeve 191 overlying the shaft 205
rather than the pair of perforated injector plates. The sleeve includes a radial flange
192 at the upstream end thereof to create an area of smaller annular space between
the radial flange 192 and the inner wall of the chamber 200, followed by an area of
larger annular space. Thus, as the polymer moves through the mechanical mixer 140,
it is accelerated in vicinity of the injector nozzles 195 and 196 as the polymer passes
through the reduced annular space between the sleeve 191 and the inner wall of chamber
200. It is noted that the second injection station embodiment would include injector
nozzles which are essentially the same as the injector nozzles of Figure 6.
[0029] Referring back to the movement of the molten polymer through the mechanical mixer
140, the polymer now having a first dose of spin agent is mixed or dispersed by mechanical
agitation or shearing forces generated by a series of mixing elements attached to
the shaft 205. In the preferred embodiment shown in Figure 3, the mechanical mixer
140 includes four groupings of mixing elements wherein the first grouping includes
three mixing elements 231, 232 and 233. As will be described in more detail below,
the first two mixing elements 231 and 232 of the first grouping are duplicates of
one another while the third mixing element 233 is a differently styled mixing element.
The mixing elements 231, 232 and 233 are preferably designed as interchangeable sections
such that the various sections can be switched and replaced to enable the creation
of a wide variety of different styled mixers. This has the advantage of providing
greater flexibility in design without adding tremendously to the cost.
[0030] Focusing now on the details of the particular mixing sections, a forward helical
mixing element (generally indicated by the number 300) is illustrated in Figure 8.
For purposes of clarity, three differently styled mixing "elements" will be described
which may be arranged in various combinations on the shaft 205. The forward helical
mixing element 300 comprises a hollow core shaft 305 adapted to be slipped onto the
main mixer shaft 205 A suitable arrangement may be provided to lock the hollow core
shaft 305 to the drive shaft 205 such as a conventional key way or by pins, etc. The
mixing section 300 further includes a series of helical flights 311, 312, 313, and
314 set out and away from the hollow core shaft 305 and having an outer radius slightly
smaller than the radius of the inner wall of the chamber 200. The helical flights
are fixed to the hollow core shaft by a plurality of radiating flight support legs
316. The flight support legs 316 are preferably welded onto the hollow core shaft
but may alternatively be attached by screw thread or other suitable arrangement. The
ends of the helical flights are adapted to terminate into end rings 318 and 319 which
are also spaced from the core shaft 305. There are four helical flights, each offset
by 90 degrees to the adjacent flights which is particularly easy to see when considering
where the helical flights intersect the end rings 318 and 319. The mixing element
is arranged such that the length of the mixing section 300 is approximately twice
the diameter of the periphery of the helical flights and each flight makes one complete
revolution around the core shaft 305 in a ribbon-like manner. It should be noted that
the forward helical mixing element 300 includes a space between the exterior of the
hollow core shaft and the inner portions of both the helical flights and the end rings.
[0031] The forward helical mixing element 300 rotates such that the polymer is pushed forward
in the mechanical mixer 140. As such, the illustrated mixing element 300 is characterized
as a forward helix mixing section. A reverse helical type mixing element is configured
essentially the same as a forward helical mixing element except that the flights are
oriented to push the polymer in the opposite direction.
[0032] During development of the mechanical mixer 140, a mechanical mixer was tested in
which all of the mixing elements were either forward helical mixing elements or reverse
helical mixing elements. With such a mechanical mixer, diffculties relating to slow
spin agent absorption rates and great differences in viscosity between the polymer
and spin agent became most pronounced. It was found that the forward helical mixing
element 300 did little to disperse spin agent into the polymer and, in some tests,
appeared to substantially retard mixing. The observed action was that the heavier
thicker polymer was being conveyed forward in the mechanical mixer 140 by the helical
blades 311, 312, 313 and 314 while the spin agent was being expressed from the mass
and actually backing up in the chamber along the hollow core shaft 305. As a result,
the polymer was pushed through the mechanical mixer 140 without absorbing the predetermined
amount of spin agent suitable for flash spinning. This separation process is referred
to herein as differential conveying. Where differential conveying exists, the thicker,
more viscous fluid in the mixer is conveyed at a different speed or even in a direction
opposite from the lighter less viscous fluid. It should be understood that differential
conveying applies to the polymer and spin agent while they are still dispersed and
not to the homogeneous solution once it is formed.
[0033] On the other hand, a reverse helical mixing element was better at dispersing the
spin agent and polymer so as to enhance absorption. However, the reverse helical mixing
element opposes the forward progress of the solution through the chamber 200. This
resistance creates a substantial pressure drop in the solution. As noted above, the
cloud point of the solution, particularly in the initial high viscosity zones, is
at a relatively high pressure. Thus, any substantial pressure drop risks bringing
the pressure of the solution to a level which risks counteracting the effects of the
mixing. Once the pressure of the solution falls to the cloud point, the spin agent
and polymer that has already formed a homogeneous solution will separate. Thus, although
satisfactory mixing may be achieved with a reverse helical mixing element, the solutioning
system can only tolerate a certain amount of pressure drop.
[0034] Referring now to Figure 9, there is illustrated a preferred embodiment of counterhelix
mixing element 400 in accordance with the present invention which has been found to
generate the desired dispersion without creating differential conveying or excessive
pressure drop. The counterhelix mixing element 400, comprises a hollow core shaft
405, flight support legs 416 and end rings 418 and 419. The counterhelix mixing element
400, similar to the forward helical mixing element 300, also includes four helical
blades 411,412,413 and 414 which are spaced from the hollow core shaft 405.
[0035] As can be more clearly seen in the drawing, the counterhelix mixing element 400 includes
additional structure not found in the forward helical mixing element 300. In particular,
two peripheral reverse oriented helical blades 421 and 422 are interlaced through
the forward oriented helical blades 411, 412, 413 and 414. The reverse oriented helical
blades are, like the forward oriented helical blades, each spaced from the hollow
core shaft 405. The mixing element 400 further includes two additional reverse oriented
helical blades called shaft mounted helical blades 425 and 426 which are positioned
effectively between the reverse peripheral helical blades 421 and 422 but are mounted
directly onto the hollow core shaft 405. The shaft mounted reverse oriented helical
blades 425 and 426 extend radially outwardly slightly more than half the distance
from the hollow shaft to the inner wall of the chamber 200. The radial projection
of the shaft mounted helical blade is also greater than the spacing of the peripherally
mounted forward and reverse helical blades 411, 412, 413, 414, 421 and 422 from the
core shaft 405. The shaft mounted reverse oriented helical blades 425 and 426 are
also segmented, or not continuous, having breaks corresponding to about every other
intersection with a forward oriented helical blade. The peripheral mounted forward
and reverse oriented blades 411, 412, 413, 414, 421 and 422 are all continuous and
where they intersect are welded or otherwise configured to meld together.
[0036] One aspect to note is that the shaft mounted helical blades 425 and 426 limit the
availability of a direct flow path along the hollow core shaft 405. In this manner,
differential conveying is thus reduced by creating a rather tortuous path through
the mixing element 400. Without wishing to be limited by theory, it is believed that
the greatest amount of shearing that causes the mixing of the polymer and spin agent
is at the peripheral edges of the helical blades adjacent the inner wall of the chamber
200. It is further believed that the shaft mounted helical blades 425 and 426 prevent
the polymer solution from bypassing or avoiding the most productive portions of the
mixer where the greatest amount of shearing is generated.
[0037] A further preferred structural feature of the counterhelix mixing element 400 is
that the forward oriented peripheral blades include peripheral notches 431 cut therein
to relieve pressure at the inner wall of the chamber 200. The sizes of the notches
are preferably cut such that the respective opposite notch faces 432 do not overlap
in the longitudinal direction. In other words, a line may be drawn parallel to the
axis of the hollow shaft core 405 that extends through the notch 431 without intersecting
either of the opposite notch faces 432. Preferably, the notches are arranged on the
forward oriented blades 411, 412, 413, and 414 in a manner such that the notched portion
of each blade is followed by a solid portion on the next blade as the mixing element
400 rotates. With this arrangement, matter that passes through any notch will be impacted
by the next one of the forward oriented rotating blades and polymer, spin agent and
solution are not allowed to build up on the inner wall of chamber 200.
[0038] With all these features and structural elements, the counterhelix mixing element
400 in accordance with the preferred embodiment has been found empirically not to
differentially convey fluids of different viscosity. This is also accomplished by
the design of the mixing element 400 that does not impart any forward motion or reverse
motion on the fluid in the chamber 200. Solution passing through the counterhelix
mixing element 400 experiences the same pressure drop regardless of whether the element
is rotating and regardless of the rotational speed. While it is known that the design
described above achieves the objective of mixing fluids of very different viscosities
without significant differential conveying of the fluids being mixed, the ranges of
the parameters have not yet been extensively explored. Clearly, the potential parameters
and variability of the parameters are considerable. Suffice it to note that the counterhelix
mixing element of the present invention creates substantial dispersion of the fluids
such that the fluids have the opportunity for ready absorption while substantially
not rendering effects that have the strong consequence of undoing the intended object.
[0039] Returning again to Figure 3 to continue the description of the first arrangement
of the mechanical mixer 140, the first mixing element 231 comprises a counterhelix
mixing element 400 according to the preferred embodiment. The second mixing element
232 also comprises a counterhelix mixing element 400 according to the preferred embodiment.
Between the first and second mixing elements 231 and 232 is a first intervening perforated
plate 235 which is essentially of the same construction as the perforated injection
plates 215 and 216. The intervening perforated plate 235 provides substantial shear
on the mass of polymer and spin agent to hasten the absorption of the free spin agent
therein.
[0040] It is believed that the polymer and spin agent are well dispersed by the time they
pass through the end of the second mixing section and that further dispersion is unnecessary.
Thus, the third mixing element 233 is a forward helical mixing element 300 so as to
reduce the amount of further pressure drop in the solutioning system 100. As noted
above, the forward oriented helical mixing elements 300 are believed to not necessarily
render good mixing and in some circumstances tend to separate the fluids. However,
once the spin agent is thoroughly mixed with the polymer, and the temperature and
pressure are above the cloud point, a stable solution is formed and a forward helical
mixing element 300 is not going to separate the spin agent from the polymer unless
the pressure falls below the cloud point. Between the third mixing element 233 and
the second mixing element is a second intervening perforated plate 236 similar to
the first perforated plate 235.
[0041] The first arrangement of the mechanical mixer 140 further includes a second grouping
of three mixing elements 251, 252 and 253 which follows the second injection station
157. The second grouping is very similar to the first. The fourth and fifth mixing
elements 251 and 252 are counterhelix mixing elements 400 according to the preferred
embodiment. The sixth mixing element 253 is a forward oriented helical mixing element
300. Third and fourth intervening perforated plates 255 and 256 are positioned between
the fourth, fifth and sixth mixing elements 251, 252 and 253.
[0042] The mechanical mixer further includes a third grouping of three mixing elements 271,
272 and 273 which follow the third injection station 158. In this third grouping,
the seventh, eighth and ninth mixing elements 271,272 and 273 are all counterhelix
mixing elements 400 according to the preferred embodiment with intervening perforated
plates 275 and 276 positioned thereinbetween. The mechanical mixer includes one further
injection station 159 for flexibility of design; however, it is closed off and not
used at present. The fourth and last injection station provides demarcation between
the third grouping and the last grouping of mixing elements. The mechanical mixer
140 includes a final grouping of mixing elements, this last grouping includes four
mixing elements 291, 292, 293, and 294. The mixing elements of the last group are
reverse helical mixing elements as described above. The reverse helical mixing elements
are essentially constructed the same as the forward helical mixing element 300 except
the flights are oriented in the opposite direction to push the fluid backwards in
the mechanical mixer 140. The reverse oriented helical elements tend to provide good
mixing. The mixing elements 291, 292, 293, and 294 provide some final mixing before
the solution is discharged to the static mixer system 160. Intervening perforated
plates 295, 296 and 297 are positioned between the elements as in the previous groupings.
A discharge plate 298 is arranged at the end of the shaft 205 to center the same.
Once the polymer passes the discharge plate, it is discharged through outlet 299.
[0043] Referring to Figure 4, a second arrangement of the mechanical mixer 140 is shown
which is quite similar to the arrangement shown in Figure 3 . Thus, for purposes of
brevity, the discussion will be limited to the differences between the first and second
arrangements. Corresponding components in Figure 4 are indicated with similar reference
numbers except that the hundredths place includes a "5" rather than a "2". Referring
to Figure 4, the second intervening plate is replaced with a spacer 536. By eliminating
the perforated plate, some of the pressure drop through the mechanical mixer 140 is
reduced. Similarly the fourth, sixth, eighth, ninth and tenth perforated plates are
substituted with spacers in the arrangement shown in Figure 4. The mechanical mixer
of the second arrangement should result in less pressure drop and slightly less mixing
than the first mixer arrangement of Figure 3. The number of perforated plates may
be adjusted if more or less thorough mixing is necessary to provide a solution suitable
for flash spinning.
[0044] It should be noted that some of the perforated plates used in the mechanical mixer
140 may have different sizes of perforations and different numbers of openings. Generally,
the larger size perforations are used at the first end of the mixer where the polymer
has a higher viscosity. Plates having a larger number of smaller perforations are
typically used later in the mixer 140 where the viscosity of the solution is lower
and it is desired to be sure that all the spin agent is adsorbed into the polymer.
[0045] The foregoing description and drawings were intended to explain and describe the
invention so as to contribute to the public base of knowledge. In exchange for this
contribution of knowledge and understanding, exclusive rights are sought and should
be respected. The scope of such exclusive rights should not be limited or narrowed
in any way by the particular details and preferred arrangements that may have been
shown. Clearly, the scope of any patent rights granted on this application should
be measured and determined by the claims that follow.
1. Gegenläufiges Mischelement (400) für einen mechanischen Mischapparat (140), das zur
Rotation im Inneren eines im allgemeinen zylindrischen Gehäuses (200) geeignet ist
und strömungsfähige Medien miteinander mischt, wobei das Mischelement (400) eine Aufnahmewelle
(405) und Gänge auf dem Mischerrohr (411, 412, 421, 422) einschließt, die sich von
der Aufnahmewelle (405) nach außen erstrecken, wobei das Mischelement (400) einen
Druckabfall bewirkt, wenn durch das zylindrische Gehäuse (200) strömungsfähiges Medium
durchläuft, wobei jedoch der Druckabfall unabhängig von der Drehzahl, mit der das
Mischelement (400) im Inneren des zylindrischen Gehäuses (200) rotiert, weitgehend
gleich ist und wobei die Gänge des Mischrohres (411, 412, 421, 422) aufweisen:
erste helikale Gänge des Mischrohres (411, 412), um strömungsfähige Medien in eine
erste Richtung zu fördern, wenn das Element (400) in dem Gehäuse in Rotation versetzt
wird;
zweite helikale Gänge des Mischrohres (421, 422), die so angeordnet sind, dass sie
strömungsfähige Medien in die entgegengesetzte Richtung fördern, wobei die zweiten
helikalen Gänge des Mischrohres (421, 422) mit den ersten helikalen Gängen des Mischrohres
(411, 412) verschachtelt sind;
dritte helikale Gänge des Mischrohres (413, 414), die so angeordnet sind, dass sie
strömungsfähige Medien in die erste Richtung fördern;
vierte helikale Gänge des Mischrohres (425, 426), die so angeordnet sind, dass sie
strömungsfähige Medien in die entgegengesetzte Richtung fördern, wobei die ersten,
zweiten und dritten helikalen Gänge des Mischrohres (411, 412, 413, 414, 421, 422)
von der Aufnahmewelle (405) durch Haltestege (416) beabstandet sind und die vierten
helikalen Gänge des Mischrohres (425, 426) an der Aufnahmewelle (405) angrenzend befestigt
sind und in Segmente unterteilt sind und welche sich nicht so weit radial nach außen
von der Aufnahmewelle (405) erstrecken wie die ersten, zweiten und dritten helikalen
Gänge des Mischrohres (411, 412, 413, 414, 421, 422).
2. Mischelement nach Anspruch 1, bei welchem die ersten und dritten helikalen Gänge des
Mischrohres (411, 412, 413, 414), die von der Aufnahmewelle (405) beabstandet sind
und die so angeordnet sind, dass sie strömungsfähige Medien in die erste Richtung
fördern (431), entlang ihrer Peripherie Kerben einschließen.