FIELD OF INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to compositions for protecting detectable labels from
chemical or enzymatic alteration and to their use in amplification and detection methods.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] A target nucleic acid sequence can be detected by various methods using detection
probes designed to preferentially hybridize to the target sequence over other sequences
that may be present in a sample. Examples of target sequences include sequences initially
present in a sample or produced as part of an amplification procedure.
[0003] Examples of detection probes include oligonucleotides and derivatives thereof able
to preferentially hybridize to a target nucleic acid containing a target nucleic acid
sequence over other nucleic acids that may be present in a sample. Hybridization of
detection probes to target nucleic acid sequences results in the formation of detectable
probe:target hybridization complexes under appropriate conditions.
[0004] Detecting detectable probe:target hybridization complexes is facilitated using a
labeled detection probe. Different labels and assay formats can be used to detect
the presence or amount of an analyte in a sample. Examples of detectable labels include
radioisotopes, fluorescent molecules, chemiluminescent molecules, chromophors, enzymes,
enzyme substrates and ligands. Examples of references describing the detection of
nucleic acid using fluorescent and chemiluminescent molecules include
Arnold et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,283,174 and
Becker et at. U.S. Patent No. 5,731,148,
[0005] To facilitate detection of a target nucleic acid sequence, the number of target sequences
in a sample can be increased using nucleic acid amplification techniques. Nucleic
acid amplification involves the enzymatic synthesis of nucleic acid containing a sequence
complementary to a nucleic acid sequence being amplified. Nucleic acid amplification
can be performed using different techniques such as those involving transcription-based
amplification, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), ligase chain reaction (LCR) and
strand displacement amplification (SDA).
[0006] Transcription-based amplification of a nucleic acid sequence generally employs an
RNA polymerase, a DNA polymerase, deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates, ribonucleoside
triphosphates, and a promoter-template complementary oligonucleotide. The promoter-template
complementary oligonucleotide contains a 5' sequence recognized by an RNA polymerase
and a 3' sequence that hybridizes to a template nucleic acid in a location 3' of a
sequence sought to be amplified. After hybridization of the promoter-template complementary
oligonucleotide to the template, a double-stranded promoter is formed upstream from
the target nucleic acid sequence. Double-stranded promoter formation generally involves
DNA polymerase activity. Generally, a second oligonucleotide primer is employed to
facilitate double-stranded promoter formation.
[0007] Transcription-based amplification involves the binding of an RNA polymerase to a
promoter region that is usually double-stranded. The RNA polymerase proceeds downstream
from the promoter region and synthesizes ribonucleic acid in a 5' to 3' direction.
Multiple RNA transcripts are produced by transcription-based amplification using a
single template.
[0008] Different formats can be employed for performing transcription-based amplification.
Examples of different formats are provided in publications such as
Burg et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,437,990;
Kacian et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,399,491;
Kacian et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,554,516;
McDonough et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,766,849;
Ryder et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,786,183;
Malek et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,130,238; Kacian
et al., International Application No.
PCT/US93/04015, International Publication No.
WO 93/22461; Gingeras
et al., International Application No.
PCT/US87/01966, International Publication No.
WO 88/01302;
Gingeras et al., International Application No. PCT/US88/02108, International Publication No.
WO 88/10315; Davey and Malek, European Application No.
88113948.9, European Publication No.
0 329 822 A2; and Urdea, International Application No.
PCT/US91/00213, International Publication No.
WO 91/10746.
[0009] PCR amplification is described by
Mullis et al., U.S. Patent Nos. 4,683,195,
4,683,202, and
4,800,159, and in
Methods in Enzymology, 155:335-350 (1987).
[0010] An example of LCR is described in European Patent Publication No.
320 308, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. LCR uses at least four separate
oligonucleotides. Two of the oligonucleotides hybridize to a nucleic acid template
so that the 3' end of one oligonucleotide and the 5' end of the other oligonucleotide
are positioned for ligation. The hybridized oligonucleotides are then ligated forming
a full-length complement to the target nucleic acid sequence. The double-stranded
nucleic acid is then denatured, and third and fourth oligonucleotides are hybridized
to the complementary strand and joined together. Amplification is achieved by further
cycles of hybridization, ligation, and denaturation, producing multiple copies of
the target nucleic acid sequence and the sequence complementary to the target nucleic
acid sequence.
[0011] SDA is an isothermal amplification reaction based on the ability of a restriction
enzyme to nick the unmodified strand of a hemiphosphorothioate form of its recognition
site, and on the ability of a DNA polymerase to initiate replication at the nick and
displace a downstream non-template strand. (
See, e.
g.,
Walker, PCR Methods and Applications, 3:25-30 (1993),
Walker et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 20:1691-1996 (1992), and
Walker et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89:392-396 (1991). The steps used in generating fragments for carrying out autocatalytic SDA amplification
are indicated to be adaptable for generating fragments for transcription-based amplification
or amplification carried out using Q-beta technology (
Walker et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 20:1691-1696 (1992).
US 4,766,064 discloses a diagnostic reagent containing a complex of a probe polynucleotide bound
via purine/pyramidine hydrogen bonding to a lebeled polynucleotide, wherein the probe
contains a target binding region capable of binding to a target nucleotide sequence
of a biological sample.
[0012] EP 709 466 A2 discloses methods for simultaneously or sequentially detecting multiple nucleic acid
analytes in a sample utilizing oligonucleotide hydridization probes coupled to different
chemiluminescent labeling reagents as well as specific combinations of chemiluminescent
labeling reagents suitable, when coupled to an oligonucleotide probe for use together
in methods for the detection of nucleic acid analytes.
[0013] EP 639 648 A1 features a method for assaying the ability of an oligonucleotide to form a hybrid
with a target nucleic acid seqence as well as an assay for measuring the ability of
a ribozyme to cleare a target nucleic acid sequence and an assay for measuring the
ability of an agent to alter nucleic acid.
[0014] EP 330 433 B1 discloses a method for preparing a labelled specific binding partner which uses a
peptide or nucleotide moiety, as other specific binding partner, and a chemiluminescent
label, wherein the label is protected from inactivation by preparation of a protective
adduct of the label.
[0015] US 5,591,586 describes a method for locating where upon one single-stranded target nucleic acid
molecule one as more separate single-stranded nucleic acid probe molecules hybridize.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
[0016] The present invention features compositions and methods as defined in the appended
claims that are useful for storing labeled detection probes and detecting whether
a target nucleic acid sequence is present in a sample. Preferred compositions are
made up of a detection probe containing a label susceptible to a chemical or enzymatic
alteration and a protection probe that protects the label from alteration and/or decreases
the ability of the detection probe to inhibit nucleic acid amplification. Such compositions
can be used, for example, to stabilize a detection probe label and to prevent a detection
probe from hybridizing prematurely to amplified or target nucleic acid.
[0017] Chemical and enzymatic alterations of a detection probe label are changes in chemical
identity or bonding effecting a signal produced from the altered label compared to
a signal produced from an unaltered label. Examples of chemical and enzymatic alterations
include oxidation, reduction, acid hydrolysis, base hydrolysis, alkylation and enzymatic
cleavage or hydrolysis. Preferably, the chemical or enzymatic alteration causes a
loss of signal detectability from the label.
[0018] A label susceptible to a chemical or enzymatic alteration, also referred to herein
as a "susceptible label", contains a labile group that undergoes such alteration in
an aqueous solution containing an agent normally able to act on the labile group.
Preferably, a labile group is subject to hydrolysis in an aqueous solution having
a pH between about pH 4 and about pH 9. Examples of labile groups include an ester
linkage and a thioester linkage.
[0019] A protection probe protects the label from alteration when the label is altered to
a lesser extent in the presence of the protection probe than in the absence of the
protection probe. In preferred embodiments, the difference in alteration rates in
the presence and the absence of the protection probe is at least about 10-fold, at
least about 20-fold, and at least about 40-fold.
[0020] Detection and protection probes are molecules comprising nitrogenous bases that are
purines, pyrimidines, or derivatives thereof. The nitrogenous bases are positioned
on the probes so they can hydrogen bond with purine or pyrimidine bases present on
a nucleic acid to form a hybridization complex. Such positioning also allows detection
probe nitrogenous bases to hydrogen bond to protection probe nitrogenous bases to
form a hybridization complex.
[0021] A detection probe can form a hybridization complex with a target nucleic acid sequence.
The detection probe:target hybridization complex can be detected to indicate the presence
of the target sequence. Preferred detection probes contain one or more detectable
labels that can be used to facilitate determining whether detection probe:target hybridization
complexes are present.
[0022] A protection probe can be used to protect a detection probe label susceptible to
a chemical or enzymatic alteration from such alteration by forming a detection probe:protection
probe hybridization complex. The protection probe can be removed from the detection
probe at a later time allowing the detection probe to be used to detect the presence
of a target sequence.
[0023] A detection probe:protection probe hybridization complex can also be used to reduce
hybridization of the detection probe to amplified nucleic acids during amplification.
Increasing the number of target nucleic acid sequences using nucleic acid amplification
techniques can facilitate detection of a target nucleic acid sequence. However, detection
probes present during nucleic acid amplification can inhibit amplification by hybridizing
to amplification products before amplification is finished.
[0024] Detection probes present in detection probe:protection probe hybridization complexes
are not free to hybridize to amplified nucleic acid. After amplification, the stringency
conditions can be raised to destabilize detection probe:protection probe hybridization
complexes while allowing for the formation of detection probe:target hybridization
complexes. Additionally, the presence of excess target nucleic acid produced by the
amplification helps drive the formation of detection probe:target hybridization complexes.
[0025] Thus, a first aspect of the present invention describes a composition as defined
in claim 1.
[0026] "Hybridized" and "hybridization complex" refer to stable hybridization complexes.
Stable hybridization complexes have a Tm at, or higher, than the solution temperature.
[0027] Preferably, the protection probe does not form a "hydrolysis protecting adduct" with
the label. A "hydrolysis protecting adduct" refers to an adduct formed between a protective
adduct forming molecule and a susceptible label that protects the label from hydrolysis.
[0028] Reference to a "fully complementary target nucleic acid" of the detection probe indicates
that either, or both, the DNA complement or RNA complement can be used as a reference
oligonucleotide to determine whether the detection probe has the described property.
The DNA complement is a deoxyribonucleic acid of the same length as the detection
probe where each nucleotide present can hydrogen bond to the detection probe by Watson-Crick
(e.g., A-T, G-C) hydrogen bonding. The RNA complement is a ribonucleic acid of the
same length as the detection probe where each nucleotide present can hydrogen bond
to the detection probe by Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding.
[0029] Preferably, the composition further comprises an aqueous solution able to chemically
or enzymatically alter a susceptible label, and the protection probe protects the
label from alteration. More preferably, the susceptible label can be hydrolyzed in
the aqueous solution, and the protection probe protects the label from hydrolysis.
[0030] In preferred embodiments, the susceptible label is a chemiluminescent label; the
susceptible label is an optionally substituted acridinium ester; and chemiluminescence
from the susceptible label proceeds via an electronically excited optionally substituted
N-alkyl acridone.
[0031] In additional preferred embodiments the protection probe and the detection probe
are present in an aqueous solution not containing target nucleic acid, and the composition
"consists essentially of" or "consists of" the protection probe, the detection probe
and the aqueous solution.
[0032] Herein described is a composition comprising (1) an aqueous solution, (2) a detection
probe comprising a label susceptible to a chemical or enzymatic alteration in the
aqueous solution, and (3) a protection probe that protects the label from alteration.
The detection probe and the protection probe are stored in the aqueous solution for
at least 1 day (
i.
e., 24 hours). Preferably, the protection probe does not form a "hydrolysis protecting
adduct" with the label.
[0033] Herein described is a composition comprising (1) an aqueous solution, (2) a detection
means for detecting the presence of a nucleic acid sequence, wherein the detection
means comprises a label susceptible to a chemical or enzymatic alteration in the aqueous
solution, and (3) a label protection means for inhibiting the alteration of the label.
A hybridization complex formed between the detection means and the label protection
means has a lower Tm in the aqueous solution than a hybridization complex formed between
the detection means and a fully complementary target nucleic acid. Preferably, the
label protection means does not form a hydrolysis protecting adduct with the label.
[0034] "Detection means" refers to material described in the present application and equivalents
thereof for detecting the presence of a nucleic acid target sequence.
[0035] "Label protection means" refers to material described in the present application
and equivalents thereof for inhibiting the chemical or enzymatic alteration of a detection
probe label.
[0036] Herein described is a composition comprising (1) an aqueous solution, (2) a detection
means for detecting the presence of a nucleic acid sequence, wherein the detection
means comprises a label susceptible to a chemical or enzymatic alteration in the aqueous
solution; and (3) a label protection means for inhibiting alteration of the label,
provided that the detection means and the label protection means are stored together
for at least 1 day. Preferably, the label protection means does not form a hydrolysis
protecting adduct with the label.
[0037] Herein described is a composition consisting essentially of (1) a detection means
for detecting the presence of a target nucleic acid sequence, (2) an inhibiting means
for inhibiting the ability of the detection means to hybridize to the target sequence
during an isothermal amplification reaction, and (3) an optionally present aqueous
solution. A hybridization complex formed between the detection means and the inhibiting
means has a lower Tm than a hybridization complex formed between the detection means
and a fully complementary target nucleic acid of the detection means. Preferably,
the inhibiting means does not form a hydrolysis protecting adduct with the detection
means.
[0038] "Inhibiting means" refers to material described in the present application and equivalents
thereof for inhibiting the ability of the detection means to hybridize to the target
nucleic acid sequence during an isothermal amplification reaction.
[0039] Isothermal amplification occurs under conditions of essentially constant temperature
where the temperature is not alternately raised and lowered to achieve melting then
annealing of nucleic acid, such as that occurring in PCR. In one embodiment, the temperature
does not change more than about 5°C. Preferably, isothermal amplification is performed
under conditions where the temperature is not changed by any external forces, such
as by heating or cooling.
[0040] Another aspect of the present invention describes a method of determining whether
a target nucleic acid sequence is present in a sample involving the production of
amplified target nucleic acid sequences. The method comprises the steps as defined
in the appended independent method claim.
[0041] Under amplifying conditions the detection probe is hybridized to the protection probe.
Under detection conditions the detection probe is not stably hybridized with the protection
probe, but can hybridize to the amplified nucleic acid if present. By "not stably
hybridized" is meant that the hybridization complex, if present, has a Tm less than
the temperature of the solution.
[0042] The detection probe comprises a susceptible label and the protection probe protects
the label from chemical or enzymatic alteration in the reaction mixture or under amplifying
conditions. More preferably, the protection probe does not form a hydrolysis protecting
adduct with the label.
[0043] Herein described is a method of determining whether a target nucleic acid sequence
is present in a sample comprising the steps of:
- a) producing a reaction mixture comprising a detection probe hybridized to a protection
probe, where the detection probe comprises a label susceptible to a chemical or enzymatic
alteration and the protection probe protects the label from alteration, and
- b) providing the reaction mixture to the sample and detecting whether the detection
probe is hybridized to the target sequence under detection conditions as an indication
that the target sequence is present in the sample. Preferably, the protection probe
does not form a hydrolysis protecting adduct with the label.
[0044] Various examples are described herein. These examples are not intended in any way
to limit the claimed invention. Thus, unless otherwise stated in a claim, reference
to one or more example(s) in the specification does not limit the claimed invention
to the indicated example(s).
[0045] Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following
drawings, the description of the invention, the examples, and the claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0046]
Figure 1 illustrates a loss of detectable signal with time using AE-labeled probe
SEQ. ID. No. 12 with excess protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 14 as target. The log of
the percent input RLU was plotted versus time.
Figure 2 illustrates the Tm determination of AE-labeled probe SEQ. ID. No. 12 with
excess protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 14 as target. The percent input RLU was plotted
versus temperature.
Figure 3 illustrates the ability of protection probes to affect the stability of labeled
probes during storage at different temperatures. The temperatures provided in parenthesis
are in °C. "-PPO" refers to labeled probe in the absence of a protection probe. "PPOcc"
refers to the presence of protection and detection probes.
Figure 4 illustrates the ability of different protection probes to affect the stability
of labeled probes during storage at different temperatures. The temperatures provided
in parenthesis are in °C. "-PPO" refers to labeled probe in the absence of a protection
probe. "PPOa" refers to the presence of a labeled probe and a protection probe of
SEQ. ID. No. 16. "PPOc" refers to the presence of a labeled probe and a protection
probe of SEQ. ID. No. 17.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0047] The present invention features compositions and methods as defined in the appended
claims useful for storing detection probes and detecting the presence of a target
nucleic acid sequence in a sample. The compositions contain a protection probe that
protects a label susceptible to chemical or enzymatic alteration from such alteration
and/or decreases the ability of the detection probe to inhibit nucleic acid amplification.
Label Protecting Hybridization complexes
[0048] Based on the guidance provided herein, detection probe:protection probe hybridization
complexes can be produced to protect one or more susceptible labels present on a detection
probe from alteration in an aqueous solution containing an agent able to chemically
or enzymatically alter the label. Protection of a susceptible label from alteration
is achieved by a protective hybridization microenvironment produced by a detection
probe:protection probe hybridization complex.
[0049] Preferably, a susceptible label is positioned internally within a detection probe:protection
probe hybridization complex between groups, such as nucleotide bases, involved in
hydrogen bonding. In different embodiments the detection probe:protection probe hybridization
complex contains at least 3, at least 5, or at least 7, groups involved in hydrogen
bonding on each side of any susceptible label which is present in the hybridization
complex.
[0051] The protection probe can protect a label from chemical or enzymatic alteration without
forming a hydrolysis protecting adduct with the label. The use of adduct formation
to protect a label from alteration prior to a detection method is described by
Arnold et al. U.S. Patent No. 4,950,613.
[0052] Advantages of forming a hybridization complex to protect the detection probe label,
rather than forming a protective adduct using an adduct former, include the ease with
which the detection probe label can be removed from the protecting group (the protection
probe) to facilitate the use of the detection probe to detect the presence of a target
nucleic acid.
Amplification
[0053] The present invention can be used to provide a detection probe, hybridized to a protection
probe, to a sample prior to an amplification. The ability of the detection probe to
interfere with an amplification is inhibited when it is hybridized to the protection
probe.
[0054] Preferably, this aspect of the invention employs an isothermal amplification. More
preferably, the isothermal amplification is performed at a temperature below the detection
probe:protection probe Tm. Isothermal amplification techniques are well known in the
art, and examples are provided in the "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION"
supra. More preferably, detection probe:protection probe hybridization complexes are used
in conjunction with transcription-based amplification.
[0055] More preferably, the detection probe present in a detection probe:protection probe
hybridization complex contains a label that is protected by the hybridization complex
from chemical or enzymatic alteration.
[0056] Providing the detection probe to a sample prior to an amplification simplifies a
detection method by reducing the number of steps where a reagent needs to be added.
However, the presence of a detection probe available for hybridization to amplified
nucleic acid can inhibit further amplification of the amplified nucleic acid. Detection
probes present in detection probe:protection probe hybridization complexes are not
available to hybridize to amplified nucleic acid.
[0057] After amplification, the stringency of the environment containing amplified nucleic
acid can be raised to separate the detection probe from the detection probe:protection
probe hybridization complex. For example, heat can be applied to destabilize detection
probe:protection probe hybridization complexes while providing an environment suitable
for stable detection probe:target hybridization complexes. Additionally, the increased
number of target nucleic acids produced by the amplification helps drive the formation
of detection probe:target hybridization complexes.
[0058] The detection probe:protection probe hybridization complex Tm is preferably at least
about 2°C greater than the temperature used during amplification conditions. In different
embodiments the detection probe:protection probe hybridization complex Tm is at least
about 5°C, or at least about 10°C greater than the temperature used during amplification
conditions.
Target Sequence Bias
[0059] The detection probe can be biased towards the target nucleic acid sequence to form
a more stable hybridization complex with the target sequence than with the protection
probe using different design considerations affecting hybridization complex stability.
Such considerations include the degree of complementarity, the type of complementary
recognition groups, and the backbone structure. The effects of these considerations
vary depending upon the environmental conditions.
[0060] The degree of complementarity takes into account the number of groups present on
the detection probe that hydrogen bond with groups present on the protection probe
and on the target nucleic acid. The detection probe can be designed to have a greater
degree of complementarity to the target nucleic acid than to the protection probe
using different techniques. Such techniques include, for example, designing the detection
probe to have mismatches with the protection probe, but not with the target nucleic
acid, and the use of non-nucleotide linkers. In different embodiments, the protection
probe is shorter than the detection probe, and the protection probe is not perfectly
complementary to the detection probe.
[0062] The types of groups present in a detection probe and a protection probe can be chosen
to bias the detection probe towards the target nucleic acid sequence by also taking
into account factors such as the degree of hydrogen bonding between different nitrogenous
bases. For example, G-C pairing or 2,6 diaminopurine-thymine pairing is stronger than
A-T pairing and pairing with universal bases such as inosine. The detection probe
can be designed to have increased G or C pairing with nucleotides present in a target
nucleic acid sequence compared to the protection probe.
[0063] The composition of protection and detection probe backbones can be adjusted in different
ways to bias the detection probe towards a target nucleic acid sequence. Examples
of such backbones include sugar-phosphodiester type linkages, such as those present
in ribo- and deoxyribonucleic acids, or derivative thereof; and a peptide linkage,
such as that present in peptide nucleic acid.
[0064] Peptide nucleic acid may form a more stable hybridization complex with RNA than with
the corresponding DNA sequence. Thus, the detection probe can be biased towards an
RNA target nucleic acid sequence, for example, by using a detection probe containing
peptide nucleic acid groups and a protection probe made up of DNA.
[0065] In the case of a sugar-phosphodiester type linkage, both the sugar groups and the
linkage joining two sugar groups will affect hybridization complex stability. An example
of the affect the sugar can have is that seen with 2'-methoxy substituted RNA. 2'-Methoxy
containing nucleic acids generally form more stable hybridization complexes with RNA
than with the corresponding DNA sequence. Another example, is 2'-fluoro substituted
RNA which has the same type of affect as 2'-methoxy substituted RNA.
[0066] Examples of ways in which the backbone may affect hybridization complex stability
include affecting the charge density and the physical association between two strands.
Steric interactions from bulky groups can reduce hybridization complex stability.
Groups such as phosphorothioates can reduce hybridization complex stability, whereas
uncharged groups such as methylphosphonates can increase hybridization complex stability.
Detection Conditions
[0067] Detection conditions are used to destabilize protection probe:detection probe hybridization
complexes and provide an environment allowing for the formation of detection probe:target
hybridization complexes. The selection of appropriate detection conditions takes into
account factors such as the detection probe:protection probe hybridization complex
Tm, detection probe:target hybridization complex Tm, and the difference between the
Tm of the such hybridization complexes.
[0068] Depending upon the composition of an assay, the Tm of a hybridization complex will
vary. Assay factors such as salt concentration and the presence of denaturing agents
affect the Tm of a given hybridization complex. Such factors are well known in the
art.
[0069] The detection probe:target hybridization complex Tm is preferably at least about
3°C greater than the temperature used during detection conditions. In different embodiments
the detection probe:target hybridization complex Tm is at least about 5°C, or at least
about 10°C, greater than the temperature used during detection conditions.
[0070] The detection probe:protection probe hybridization complex Tm is preferably at least
about 2°C lower than the temperature used during detection conditions. In different
embodiments the detection probe:protection probe hybridization complex Tm is at least
about 5°C, or at least about 10°C, lower than the temperature used during detection
conditions.
[0071] Preferably, the detection probe:target hybridization complex Tm is at least about
5°C greater than the detection probe:protection probe hybridization complex Tm. In
different embodiments the detection probe:target hybridization complex Tm is at least
about 8°C, at least about 10°C, or at least about 15°C, greater then the detection
probe:protection probe hybridization complex Tm.
[0072] Determining whether a label is present is performed using techniques compatible with
detectable labels that are present and may involve changing the detection conditions.
Examples of techniques for determining whether detectable labels, such as, acridinium
esters, are provided by
Arnold et al. U.S. Patent No. 5,639,604, and
Becker et al. U.S. Patent No. 5,731,148. Additional techniques that can be used to detect different types of labels are well
known in the art.
Storage and Stability
[0073] Protection probes can be used to stabilize detection probe labels susceptible to
a chemical or enzymatic alteration facilitating the storage of labeled detection probes.
Efficient hybridization of the protection probe to the detection probe during storage
can be achieved using appropriate conditions and probe concentrations.
[0074] Preferably, the protection probe is used in an excess amount to the detection probe.
In different embodiments, the protection probe is present in at least about 2-fold,
at least about 10-fold, at least about 20-fold, at least about 50-fold, or at least
about 100-fold, excess to the detection probe.
[0075] Preferably, storage is carried out in a solution at a temperature at least about
10°C, or at least about 20°C, lower than the protection probe:detection probe Tm.
[0076] Additional considerations for achieving efficient hybridization of the protection
probe to the detection probe include pH, the presence of a buffer, salt concentration,
and temperature. An example of storage conditions for acridinium ester labels is 2X
Hybridization Buffer (see Example section
infra) buffered to a pH of about 5.1 and a temperature of about 4°C. Based on the present
application other suitable storage conditions for acridinium esters and other types
of labels can readily be obtained.
[0077] In one embodiment, storage conditions employ a temperature between about 4°C and
about 42°C. Generally, a lower temperature is useful for increasing detection probe
label stability. A disadvantage of employing lower temperatures is the need for refrigeration.
Protection probes can be used to stabilize detection probe labels without employing
lower temperatures, and can be used to stabilize the detection probe label at room
temperature. In different embodiments the protection and detection probes are stored
in an environment having a temperature range of about 16°C to about 30°C, about 16°C
to about 25°C, about 18°C to about 30°C, and about 18°C to about 25°C.
[0078] The protection probe can be used to increase the time in which a detection probe
label can be stored for future use. In different embodiments the protection and detection
probe are stored together for at least about 1 day, at least about 2 days, at least
about 2 weeks, at least about two months, and at least about 6 months. In additional
embodiments, the protection and detection probe are stored no more than 6 months,
no more than 4 months, no more than 2 months, no more than one month, and no more
than 2 weeks.
Probe Construction
[0079] Protection and detection probes comprise nucleic acid binding regions made up of
nucleotide base recognition groups joined together by a backbone. The nucleotide base
recognition groups are positioned so that they can hydrogen bond to nucleotides present
in a nucleic acid.
[0080] Protection and detection probes may also contain groups not part of a nucleic acid
binding region. Examples of such groups are nucleotides, or other types of groups,
positioned on the ends of the protection and detection probe which do not participate
in a detection probe:protection probe hybridization complex or a detection probe:target
hybridization complex.
[0081] A given nucleotide base recognition group present in a detection or protection probe
may be complementary to a particular nucleotide (
e.
g., adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil), and thus, be able to hydrogen
bond with that nucleotide. A nucleotide base recognition group may also be able to
hydrogen bond with different nucleotides. For example, when inosine is a nucleotide
base recognition group it can hydrogen bond with different nucleotide bases.
[0082] Preferred nucleotide base recognition groups are nitrogenous purine or pyrimidine
bases, or derivatives thereof, able to hydrogen bond with adenine, guanine, cytosine,
thymine or uracil. Examples of such recognition groups include adenine, guanine, cytosine,
thymine, uracil, and derivatives thereof. Examples of derivatives include modified
purine or pyrimidine bases such as N
4-methyl deoxyguanosine, deaza or aza purines and pyrimidines used in place of natural
purine and pyrimidine bases, pyrimidine bases having substituent groups at the 5 or
6 position, and purine bases having an altered or a replacement substituent at the
2, 6 or 8 positions.
See,
e.
g., Cook, International Application No.
PCT/US92/11339, International Publication No.
WO 93/13121.
[0083] Additional examples include, 2-amino-6-methylaminopurine, 06-methylguanine, 4-thio-pyrimidines,
4-amino-pyrimidines, 4-dimethylhydrazine-pyrimidines, 04-alkyl-pyrimidines (
see, e.
g.,
The Glen Report, Volume 1 (1993).
[0084] Protection and detection probe backbones can each be made up of the same, or different,
groups. Examples of backbone groups include sugar-phosphodiester type backbone groups
and peptide nucleic acid backbone groups.
[0085] Structure I illustrates a sugar-phosphodiester type backbone where the sugar group
is a pentofuranosyl group. The sugar groups are joined together by a linkage such
as a phosphodiester linkage or other suitable linkage.

[0086] X represents the group joining two sugars. Examples of X include -OP(O)
2O-, -NHP(O)
2O-, -OC(O)
2O-, -OCH
2C(O)
2NH-, -OCH
2C(O)
2O-, -OP(CH
3)(O)O-, -OP(S)(O)O- and -OC(O)
2NH-. As with the other examples provided herein, other equivalents that are well known
in the art or which become available can also be used.
[0087] Y
1 and Y
2 are independently selected groups. Examples of Y
1 and Y
2 include H, OH, C
1-C
4 alkoxy, halogen, and C
1-C
6 alkyl. Preferably, Y
1 and Y
2 are independently either H, OH, F, or OCH
3. C
1-C
6 alkyl and C
1-C
4 alkoxy, may include groups which are straight-chain, branched, or cyclic.
[0088] Base
1 and Base
2 are nucleotide base recognition groups able to hydrogen bond to adenine, guanine,
cytosine, thymine, uracil, or a group that does not prevent complementary base pairing
of an adjacent base to a complementary nucleic acid. Preferably Base
1 and Base
2 are independently selected from the group consisting of: adenine, guanine, cytosine,
thymine, or uracil, or a group that does not prevent complementary base pairing of
an adjacent base to a complementary nucleic acid. Examples of groups not preventing
complementary base pairing include smaller size groups such as hydrogen, OH, C
1-C
6 alkyl, and C
1-C
4 alkoxy.
[0089] R
1 and R
2 represent independently selected groups. Examples of R
1 and R
2 include additional sugar-phosphodiester type groups, hydrogen, hydroxy, peptide nucleic
acid, phosphate, thiophosphate, C
1-C
6 alkyl, an inverted (3'-3') nucleotide, 3'-deoxynucleotide, polysaccharides, polypeptides,
peptides, and non-nucleotide linkers such as those described in Arnold
et al.
U.S. Patent No. 5,696,251.
[0090] A derivative of the Structure I molecule can also used as a component of a detection
or protection probe. For example, detection and protection probes can have cyclobutyl
moieties connected by linking moieties, where the cyclobutyl moieties have hetereocyclic
bases attached thereto.
See, e.
g., Cook
et al., International Application No.
PCT/US93/01579, International Publication No.
WO 94/19023.
[0091] In an embodiment of the present invention, the protection and detection probes are
each a polynucleotide or derivative thereof. A "polynucleotide or derivative thereof"
is made up of Structure I repeating units where X is -OP(O)
2O-; Y
1 and Y
2 are independently selected from the group consisting of H, OH, OCH
3, and F; Base
1 and Base
2 are independently selected from the group consisting of: adenine, guanine, cytosine,
thymine, and uracil; and the terminal portion of the molecule contains R
1 and R
2 independently selected from the group consisting of OH, C
1-C
6 alkyl, phosphate, thiophosphate, an inverted nucleotide, and a 3' deoxynucleoside.
[0093] An example of peptide nucleic acid, made up of N-(2-aminoethyl)glycine units, is
illustrated in Structure II.

[0094] R
1 R
2, and Base
1 is as described for Structure I type molecules.
[0095] Protection and detection probes can be produced using standard techniques. Publications
describing organic synthesis of oligonucleotides and modified oligonucleotides include
Eckstein, F., Oligonucleotides and Analogues, A Practical Approach, Chapters 1-5 (1991), which reviews organic synthesis of oligonucleotides;
Caruthers et al., In Methods In Enzymology 154:287 (1987), which describes a procedure for organic synthesis of oligonucleotides using standard
phosphoramidite solid-phase chemistry; Bhatt,
U.S. Patent No. 5,252,723, which describes a procedure for organic synthesis of modified oligonucleotides containing
phosphorothioate linkages; and Klem
et al.,
International Application No. PCT/US91/07630,
International Publication No. WO 92/07864, which describes organic synthesis of modified oligonucleotides having different
internucleotide linkages including methylphosphonate linkages.
[0096] Additional references describing techniques which can be used to produce different
types of protection and detection probes include Cook, International Application No.
PCT/US92/11339, International Publication No.
WO 93/13121; Miller
et al., International Application No.
PCT/US94/00157, International Publication No.
WO 94/15619; McGee
et al., International Application No.
PCT/US93/06807, International Publication No.
W0 94/02051; Cook
et al., International Application No.
PCT/US93/01579, International Publication No.
WO 94/19023;
Hyrup and Nielsen, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 4:5-23 (1996); and Hydig-Hielsen and Godskesen, International Application No.
PCT/DK95/00195, International Publication No.
WO 95/32305.
[0097] In an embodiment of the present invention, the protection probe and the detection
probe are each made up of optionally modified oligonucleotides. Optionally modified
oligonucleotides may contain peptide nucleic acid, altered sugar groups, altered phosphodiester
linkages, and/or altered nitrogenous bases. Preferred modifications include different
purine or pyrimidine nitrogenous bases, or derivatives thereof, able to hydrogen bond
to adenine, guanine, thymine or cytosine; different sugar moieties such as 2' alkoxy
ribose, 2' halo ribose and cyclobutyl; different internucleotide linkages such as
methylphosphonate and phosphorothioate; and a blocking group. Preferably, the 2' alkoxy
ribose, if present, is 2' methoxy ribose, and the 2' halo ribose, if present, is 2'
flouro ribose.
[0098] More preferably, the protection probe and the detection probe are each optionally
modified oligonucleotides comprising one or more modifications independently selected
from the group consisting of: 2'-methoxy ribose, 2'-halo ribose, methylphosphonate
linkage, phosphorothioate linkage, and a 3' blocking group.
[0099] Protection and detection probes present during an amplification are preferably modified
with a polymerase blocking group. Blocking groups are typically located at the terminal
3' end of a probe that is made up of nucleotides or derivatives thereof containing
a 3' OH prior to the addition or formation of the blocking group. By attaching a blocking
group to a terminal 3' OH, the 3' OH group is no longer available to accept a nucleoside
triphosphate in a polymerization reaction. A blocking group can be formed, for example,
by removing the 3' OH from a terminal nucleotide.
[0100] Numerous different groups can be added to block the 3' end of a probe from being
used in a polymerization reaction. Examples of such groups include an alkyl group,
a non-nucleotide linker, phosphorothioate, alkane-diol residue, a peptide nucleic
acid, 3' deoxynucleoside (
e.
g., cordycepin), and an inverted nucleotide.
[0101] An alkyl blocking group is a saturated hydrocarbon up to 12 carbons in length that
can be straight chain, branched, and/or cyclic. More preferably, the alkyl blocking
group is a C
2-C
6 alkyl that can be straight chain, branched, and/or cyclic.
[0102] In different embodiments concerning the overall length of the protection and detection
probes, the probes are preferably about 8 to about 40, about 8 to about 35, about
8 to about 25, or about 8 to about 20, nucleotides and/or optionally modified nucleotides
in length.
Detectable Labels
[0103] Numerous different labels can be used to detect the presence of a target nucleic
acid sequence. Examples of such labels include luminescent molecules, enzymes, cofactors,
enzyme substrates, and haptens or other ligands.
[0104] Appropriate labels should be chosen which do not prevent the detection probe from
specifically hybridizing to the target nucleic acid sequence. Thus, the label should
not prevent the detection probe from distinguishing between the target sequence and
other nucleic acids present in the sample.
[0105] Preferred labels for use with the present invention are luminescent labels such as
fluorescent or chemiluminescent labels. More preferably, chemiluminescent labels are
used.
[0106] A chemiluminescent label can be triggered to emit light by a chemical reaction such
as heating and oxidation, while fluorescent label emission can be triggered by light.
Labels that can be caused to emit light by a chemical reaction are generally able
to fluoresce, though in some cases triggering of a "chemiluminescent" label by light
may result in lesser light emission than chemiluminescence. Thus, chemiluminescent
labels are generally also fluorescent labels. Examples of luminescent labels and their
use are described by
Arnold et al. U.S. Patent No. 5,639,604, and
Becker et al. U.S. Patent No. 5,731,148.
[0107] Chemiluminescent labels are chemically induced to emit light by a triggering agent
causing the formation of an excited state molecule that decays, thereby emitting light.
To facilitate light emission, the chemiluminescent label may contain a leaving group
joined to a light emitting molecule through a labile group that is cleaved during
the chemical reaction causing light emission. Examples of such labile groups include
an ester linkage and a thioester linkage.
[0108] Examples of chemiluminescent labels, the production of such labels, the joining of
the labels to a detection probe, and factors generally affecting chemiluminescent
label stability are well known in the art. These factors include the structure of
the chemiluminescent molecule, the type and position of substituents on the chemiluminescent
portion of the molecule and on a leaving group, and the structure of the linking group
joining a leaving group to the light emitting portion of the molecule.
See,
Beheshti et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,290,936;
Campbell et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,946,958;
Law et al., U.S. Patent Nos. 4,918,192,
4,745,181,
5,110,932 and
5,241,070;
McCapra et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,281,712; and McCapra
et al., European Patent Application No.
88121915.8, European Patent Publication No.
0 322 926.
[0109] Preferred chemiluminescent molecules are those having a labile group that can be
protected by the protection probe from a chemical or enzymatic alteration affecting
label detectability and which have the following structure:
where the aryl ring system comprises one to four cyclic groups, and one of the groups
is joined to linking carbon "c", more preferably the aryl ring system is positively
charged, more preferably the aryl ring system contains a positively charged heterocyclic
aryl joined to "c"; examples of heterocyclic aryls include acridinium, benz[a]acridinium,
benz[b]acridinium, benz[c]acridinium, a benzimidazole cation, quinolinium, isoquinolinium,
quinolizinium, cyclic substituted quinolinium, pyridinium, pyrimidininium, pyridazinium,
pyrazininium, phenathridinium and quinozalinium;
R2 is selected from the group consisting of S, O, and NH, preferably R2 is O;
R3 is selected from the group consisting of O, N, S, halogen, substituted phosphorous,
substituted sulfur, preferably R3 is either O, N, or S, more preferably R3 is O or S, most preferably R3 is O;
R4 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, or is absent when
R3 is halogen, preferably R4 is an aryl, more preferably R4 is an optionally substituted phenyl; and
R5 is nothing unless R3 is N; if R3 is N then R5 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, and aryl. Preferably
R5 is nothing.
[0110] Generally, the label will be joined to the detection probe through a linker attached
to R
4. However, the label can be attached to the detection probe through a linker attached
to a group other than R
4.
[0111] Positively charged Structure III molecules are ionically associated with a counter-ion.
Various different anions such as a halogen, sulfate, alkylsulfate, halosulfate, haloborate,
haloacetate, halophosphate, and phosphate can serve as a counter-ion.
[0112] An "acetyl" refers to C(=O)-CH
3.
[0113] An "alkenyl" refers to an optionally substituted hydrocarbon containing at least
one double bond, including straight-chain, branched-chain, and cyclic alkenyl groups.
Preferably, the alkenyl has 2 to 10 carbons and contains no more than 1 heteroatom.
Heteroatoms are preferably selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, sulfur,
phosphorus, and oxygen. More preferably, it is a lower alkenyl of from 2 to 6 carbons,
more preferably 2 to 4 carbons.
[0114] An "alkyl" refers to an optionally substituted saturated aliphatic hydrocarbon, including
straight-chain, branched-chain, and cyclic alkyl groups. Preferably, the alkyl has
1 to 10 carbons and contains no more than 1 heteroatom. Heteroatoms are preferably
selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, and oxygen. More
preferably, it is a lower alkyl of from 1 to 6 carbons, more preferably 1 to 4 carbons.
[0115] An "alkoxy" refers to "-O-alkyl" where "alkyl" is defined as described above and
"O" is an oxygen. Preferably, the alkoxy is a O-lower alkyl.
[0116] An "alkynyl" refers to an optionally substituted unsaturated hydrocarbon containing
at least one triple bond, including straight-chain, branched-chain, and cyclic alkynyl
groups. Preferably, the alkynyl has 2 to 10 carbons and contains no more than 1 heteroatom.
Heteroatoms are preferably selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, sulfur,
phosphorus, and oxygen. More preferably, it is a lower alkynyl of from 2 to 6 carbons,
more preferably 2 to 4 carbons.
[0117] An "amido" refers to C(=O)-NH
2.
[0118] An "amino" refers to -NH
2.
[0119] An "aryl" refers to an optionally substituted aromatic group having at least one
ring and includes carbocyclic and heterocyclic aryl structures. Examples of aryl substituents
include alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, amino, substituted amino, amido, acetyl, substituted
acetyl, carboxy, hydroxy, alkoxy, nitro, sulfonyl, halogen, optionally substituted
phenyl and optionally substituted phenoxy; wherein the optionally substituted phenyl
and optionally substituted phenoxy can have up to 5 subtituents each independently
selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, amino, substituted
amino, amido, acetyl, substituted acetyl, carboxy, hydroxy, alkoxy, nitro, sulfonyl,
and halogen.
[0120] An "aryloxy" refers to a "-O-aryl" where the "aryl" is defined as described above
and "O" is an oxygen. Preferably, the aryloxy is phenoxy.
[0121] A "carbocyclic" refers to a ring structure where all the atoms on the aromatic ring
arc carbon atoms. The carbon atoms are optionally substituted as described above for
an aryl. Preferably, the carbocyclic aryl is an optionally substituted phenyl.
[0122] A "heterocyclic aryl" refers to an aryl having 1 or more, preferably 1 to 3, heteroatoms
as ring atoms in the aromatic ring and the remainder of the ring atoms are carbon
atoms. Suitable heteroatoms include oxygen, sulfur, and nitrogen. Examples of heterocyclic
aryls include furanyl, thienyl, pyridyl, pyrrolyl, N-lower alkyl pyrrolo, pyrimidyl,
pyrazinyl, and imidazolyl. The heterocyclic aryl is optionally substituted as described
above for an aryl.
[0123] "Nitro" refers to NO
2.
[0124] A "substituted acetyl" refers to C(=O)-CH(R)
2, where each R is a non-reactive chemical atom or atoms, provided that at least one
R is not hydrogen. Examples of R include hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl, lower
alkynyl, phenyl, amino, carboxy, and alkoxy.
[0125] A "substituted amino" refers to -NH-R where R is a non-reactive chemical atom or
atoms. Examples of R include lower alkyl, lower alkenyl, lower alkynyl, phenyl, amino,
carboxy, and alkoxy.
[0126] A "substituted phosphorous" refers to -P(R)
3 where each R is a non-reactive chemical atom or atoms. Examples of R include O, =O,
S, CH
3 and alkoxy.
[0127] A "substituted sulfur" refers to the presence of an atom or atoms, other than hydrogen,
which obey chemical stoichiometry and is non-reactive.
[0128] "Sulfonyl" refers to S(O)
2-R, where R is a non-reactive atom or atoms. Examples of R include lower alkenyl,
lower alkynyl, phenyl, halogen, amino, and substituted amino.
[0129] More preferably, the chemiluminescent label is made up of an optionally substituted
acridinium joined to a leaving group as illustrated in Structure IV.
where R1 is selected from the group consisting of H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, and aryl; preferably
R1 is a lower alkyl, more preferably methyl;
n is either 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4; preferably n is either 0, 1 or 2;
m is either 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4; preferably m is either 0, 1, or 2;
each X is independently selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl,
amino, substituted amino, carboxy, hydroxy, alkoxy, nitro, sulfonyl, halogen, thiol,
amido, acetyl, substituted acetyl, optionally substituted phenyl and optionally substituted
phenoxy; wherein the optionally substituted phenyl and optionally substituted phenoxy
can have up to 5 subtituents each independently selected from the group consisting
of alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, amino, substituted amino, amido, acetyl, substituted acetyl,
carboxy, hydroxy, alkoxy, nitro, sulfonyl, and halogen. In different embodiments each
X is independently an alkyl or an alkoxy, each X is independently a lower alkyl or
a lower alkoxy, and each X is independently methyl or methoxy;
each Y is independently selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl,
amino, substituted amino, carboxy, hydroxy, alkoxy, nitro, sulfonyl, halogen, thiol,
amido, acetyl, substituted acetyl, optional substituted phenyl and optionally substituted
phenoxy; wherein the optionally substituted phenyl and optionally substituted phenoxy
can have up to 5 subtituents each independently selected from the group consisting
of alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, amino, substituted amino, amido, acetyl, substituted acetyl,
carboxy, hydroxy, alkoxy, nitro, sulfonyl, and halogen. In different embodiments each
Y is independently an alkyl or an alkoxy, each Y is independently a lower alkyl or
a lower alkoxy, and each Y is independently methyl or methoxy; and
R2, R3, R4 and R5 are defined as described above for a Structure III molecule.
[0130] Additional embodiments provide for chemiluminescent molecules joined to leaving groups
having a heterocyclic ring system selected from the group consisting of: benz[a]acridinium,
benz[b]acridinium, benz[c]acridinium, benzimidazole cation, quinolinium, isoquinolinium,
quinolizinium, cyclic substituted quinolinium, pyridinium, pyrimidininium, pyridazinium,
pyrazininium, phenathridinium and quinozalinium; where each ring of the ring system
is substituted in the same manner as a Structure IV molecule such that each available
carbon can each independently have a X/Y substituent, more preferably each ring contains
0 to 2 substituents and one of the rings is a positively charged heterocyclic ring
containing a N joined to R
1 and a carbon atom joined to a linking group; and where the molecule can be protected
from chemical or enzymatic alteration by a protection probe.
EXAMPLES
[0131] Examples are provided below illustrating different aspects and embodiments of the
present invention. The examples include techniques that can be used to determine the
suitability of different labels, protection probes and detection probes. These examples
are not intended to limit the claimed invention.
Transcription-Based Amplification Conditions
[0132] With the exception of varying target concentration, standard transcription-based
amplification reactions contained 30 pmol/reaction of the specified T7 promoter-primer,
30 pmol/reaction of the specified primer, 35 mM KCI, 75 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.5, 9 mM HEPES
pH 7.5, 20 mM MgCl
2, 1 mM dATP, 1 mM dCTP, 1 mM dGTP, 1 mM dTTP, 4 mM ATP, 4 mM CTP, 4 mM GTP, 4 mM UTP,
5% w/v PVP, 10% v/v glycerol, 12.5 mM NALC, 0.75 mM EDTA, 2.5% Triton®X-102 (Sigma),
0.0025% phenol red, 100-200 Epicentre units of reverse transcriptase (Epicentre Technologies
Inc.) and about 500 Epicentre units of T7 RNA polymerase (Epicentre Technologies Inc.)
in a 100 µl reaction volume, unless otherwise noted.
[0133] Probe-in-Amp transcription-based amplification conditions were the same as above,
with the addition of approximately 0.1 pmol of the specified acridinium ester (AE)
labeled probe, which was added to the transcription-based amplification reaction with
the enzyme reagent. When protection probes were used, the AE-labeled probe was hybridized
to the stated amount of the indicated protection probe prior to addition to the transcription-based
amplification reaction with the enzyme reagent.
[0134] For 100 µl amplification reactions, 25 µl of amplification reagent was aliquoted
to individual tubes, followed by the addition of 200 µl of mineral oil. Target RNA
(rRNA isolated from target organisms) was diluted to the appropriate copy number in
water and added in a 50 µl volume. Reactions were incubated at 95°C (in a water bath)
for 10 minutes, then transferred to 42°C for 5 minutes. Enzyme reagent (25 µl) containing
reverse transcriptase and T7 RNA polymerase, with or without labeled detection probe
or protection probe, was then added and then reaction tubes were incubated at 42°C
for an additional 60-120 minutes. Reactions were terminated by the addition of Hybridization
Buffer (0.05 M lithium succinate pH 5,0.6 M lithium chloride, 1% w/v lithium lauryl
sulfate (LLS), 10 mM EDTA, and 10 mM EGTA), which was the initial step in the amplicon
detection method.
HPA Detection
[0135] Amplicon production was detected by hybridization with AE-labeled oligonucleotide
detection probes (
e.
g. see
Arnold et al., U.S. Patent 5,283,174 ), either added after the amplification reaction, or included with the amplification
enzyme reagent (Probe-in-Amp). In some instances one or more unlabeled helper oligonucleotides
were used to facilitate hybridization to the nucleic acid having the target sequence.
(See
Hogan et al., U.S. Patent 5,030,557.)
[0136] Hybridization of the labeled detection probes added after the transcription-based
amplification reaction or for Probe-in-Amp was performed in a solution containing
Hybridization Buffer at 60°C for 10 minutes. Hybridization Buffer was normally made
as a 2X stock containing labeled detection probe and an equal volume was added to
each amplification reaction. The same hybridization reagent without probe was added
to Probe-in-Amp reactions that included AE-labeled probe with or without protection
probe, then hybridization was conducted as above. Following the 10 minute hybridization
at 60°C, 300 µl (3X reaction volume) of selection reagent containing 0.15 M sodium
tetraborate pH 8.5, and 1% Triton®X-100 was added to each tube and the reactions were
incubated at 60°C for an additional 15 minutes.
[0137] Detection and quantitation of hybridization complexes were accomplished using a luminometer.
The luminometer automatically injects two reagents, the first being composed of 1
mM nitric acid and 0.1% hydrogen peroxide (v/v), the second being 1 N sodium hydroxide.
The reagents cause the formation of chemiluminescence from unaltered acridinium esters
present in AE-labeled oligonucleotides. Assay results were given in Relative Light
Units (RLUs), a relative measure of the number of photons detected by the luminometer.
Nucleic Acid Sequences
[0138]

[0139] Oligonucleotides of SEQ. ID. Nos. 1, 2, 9, 12, and 15 contained an AE label. AE-labeled
probes SEQ. ID. Nos. 1 and 2, as well as protection probe SEQ. ID. Nos. 7, 8, and
14 used in the examples below, were blocked at the terminal 3' OH by an n-propyl group.
Example 1: AE-Labeled Probe Is Stable In Transcription-Based Amplification Conditions
[0140] Approximately 0.1 pmol of an AE-labeled probe with either an RNA backbone, SEQ. ID.
No. 1, or DNA backbone, SEQ. ID. No. 2, was incubated for up to 60 minutes in standard
transcription-based amplification conditions at 42°C (except that T7 RNA polymerase
was excluded from the mixture so that amplification could not take place). Amplification
primers SEQ. ID. Nos. 3 and 4 were included in each reaction, but no target RNA was
added.
[0141] Aliquots of the transcription-based amplification mixture containing the probe were
withdrawn at various time points and detected directly in a luminometer to determine
the amount of RLU remaining compared to the input RLU, and thus estimate the stability
of the AE-labeled probe. The result of this experiment (data not shown) was that there
was about a 10% decrease in RLU after one hour.
Example 2: Probe-In-Amp Vs. Transcription-Based Amplification Without Probe
[0142] This example compares normal transcription-based amplification detected by adding
and hybridizing the AE-labeled probe after completion of the amplification reaction
with a Probe-in-Amp amplification. The Probe-in-Amp amplification contained an AE-labeled
probe added with the enzyme reagent and, thus, the AE-labeled probe was present during
the amplification reaction.
[0143] In this example, transcription-based amplification conditions were similar to the
standard conditions described above, except the final volume was 50 µl, 15 pmol of
each primer (SEQ. ID. Nos. 3 and 4) was used instead of 30 pmol, and the amplification
included 0.02% BSA.
[0144] Amplification reactions (6 replicates each) were prepared with 0, 5 fg or 25 fg of
M. tuberculosis rRNA target (0, 2000, or 10,000 copies). In Probe-in-Amp reactions, 0.1 pmol of RNA
probe SEQ. ID. No. I was added to the reaction mixture along with the enzyme reagent,
and thus was present during the amplification.
[0145] After amplification, 10 µl of each normal or Probe-in-Amp reaction was diluted to
100 µl with water, and detected by HPA as described above. Amplicon in the Probe-in-Amp
reactions was detected using only labeled detection probe added before amplification.
Amplicon in normal amplification reactions was detected by addition of 0.1 pmol of
RNA probe SEQ. ID. No. 1 or DNA probe SEQ. ID. No. 2 plus 2.5 pmol of DNA helper probes
SEQ. ID. Nos. 5 and 6 following the protocol described above.
[0146] Results in Table 1 show that significant amplification and detection occurs in the
Probe-in-Amp (PiA) amplification reactions, but the signal is about 5-10% of the normal
amplification reaction followed by separate HPA detection.
Table 1
| Target input |
RNA PiA |
RNA HPA |
DNA HPA + helpers |
| 0 fg |
5968 |
1349 |
1612 |
| 5 fg |
39632 |
703160 |
777808 |
| 25 fg |
126595 |
914840 |
1101539 |
[0147] The RNA probe also produces a higher background signal in the Probe-in-Amp reaction
than normal amplification and HPA. RNA probe alone and DNA probe plus helper probes
yield similar RLU values in normal amplification/HPA reactions, indicating that the
lower signals from Probe-in-Amp reactions were due to decreased amplification efficiency,
or loss of probe during amplification.
Example 3: Design and Selection of A Protection Probe for an AE-Labeled Probe
[0148] This example illustrates the use of different factors for designing a protection
probe for use with an AE label. Such factors can be applied to other types of labels.
[0149] Protection probes were designed to remain hybridized to the AE-labeled probe until
hybridization of the probe to its target, usually at 60°C. The function of the protection
probe is to stabilize the AE label to as high a temperature as required, but to avoid
interfering with hybridization to target and producing high background signals during
HPA.
[0150] A protection probe is preferably designed to be shorter than the AE-labeled probe
it will protect to help ensure that the AE-labeled probe will hybridize to its target
more readily than the protection probe during HPA. The protection probe is preferably
balanced in its calculated Tm and G:C content both 5' and 3' from the AE label. The
overall Tm of the protection probe to the detection probe will be high enough to provide
the required stability, but low enough not to interfere during HPA of the probe with
its target. In addition, if the protection probe is to be used for Probe-in-Amp, the
3' end is preferably blocked so that it can not be extended by reverse transcriptase
while hybridized to the AE-labeled probe. The protection probe is usually present
in a molar excess to the AE-labeled probe to ensure stable hybridization.
[0151] Several assays can be performed to characterize protection probes for a specific
AE-labeled detection probe. The first is to determine the molar excess of protection
probe to AE-labeled probe that gives maximum protection to the probe. This can be
done, for example, by HPA of various ratios of the detection probe:protection probe
hybridization complex at a temperature below the calculated Tm (as described above).
[0152] Table 2 illustrates the results from a quantitative HPA assay performed as described
above at 42°C on the AE-labeled probe SEQ. ID. No. 12 with protection probe SEQ. ID.
No. 14 (acting as target in this assay). The amount of protection probe SEQ. ID. No.
14 ranged in concentration from none to 100-fold molar excess over the AE-labeled
probe.
Table 2
| Fold PPO concentration |
RLU |
| 0 |
271 |
| 0.5 |
94231 |
| 1 |
193918 |
| 2 |
249342 |
| 5 |
246774 |
| 10 |
248502 |
| 50 |
255087 |
| 100 |
258335 |
[0153] Table 2 comparing the molar excess of protection probe versus the RLU shows that
signals were saturated at 2-fold excess protection probe, indicating that this concentration
produced nearly maximum protection under these conditions. Good protection probes
are preferred at low concentrations for maximum stabilizing effect; 2 fold excess
is considered very good.
[0154] Next, the stability of the label in the detection probe:protection probe hybridization
complex should be estimated and compared between protection probe candidates. The
stability of the label in the hybridization complex can be estimated by determining
the time at which RLU reaches half of the input RLU during the selection step of HPA
performed at a temperature lower than the estimated Tm. Conditions are chosen such
that the protection probe is in molar excess over AE-labeled probe, and the amount
of AE-labeled probe will produce RLU within the linear range of the luminometer.
[0155] The AE-labeled probe is hybridized to excess protection probe in hybridization buffer
as described above, then selection reagent is added and incubated at the same temperature.
Aliquots are removed at time points and the log of the percent of the remaining RLU
is plotted versus time. The point at which a line plotted through the linear range
of points passes through log(50%) is called the T
1/2 of hydrolysis of the label. A larger value for T
1/2 of hydrolysis indicates a more stable label in the detection probe:protection probe
hybridization complex.
[0156] Figure 1 provides an example of determining T
1/2 of the hydrolysis of the label. AE-labeled probe SEQ. ID. No. 12 (0.25 pmol) was
used with 10-fold excess of protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 14 as the target. Hydrolysis
was performed at 42°C, and aliquots removed and read in the luminometer at 0, 5, 10,
15, 30, and 45 minutes. "Control" refers to the same AE-labeled probe, but in the
absence of protection probe (no target). T
1/2 of the control is the point at which a line plotted through the linear range passes
through log(50%).
[0157] The Figure 1 calculated T
1/2 of the hydrolysis of the label is about 54 minutes. Other shorter protection probes
produced values for T
1/2 of the hydrolysis of the label of less than 5 minutes, so protection probe SEQ. ID.
No. 14 was considerably more stable and thus was preferable.
[0158] After protection probes with acceptable concentrations and values for T
1/2 of the hydrolysis of the label are identified, the Tm of the protection probe to
the AE-labeled probe should be determined. This is accomplished by forming the detection
probe:protection probe hybridization complex, diluting and splitting into aliquots,
incubating the aliquots at various temperatures to allow the detection probe:protection
probe hybridization complex to denature at the melt temperature, then incubation with
selection reagent at a temperature lower than the estimated Tm to hydrolyze unhybridized
probe as described above. Aliquots are read in a luminometer, the percent of input
RLU (100xRLU/input RLU) versus temperature is plotted for each point, and the temperature
at which the RLU reaches 50% of the input RLU is called the Tm.
[0159] Figure 2 illustrates the Tm determination of AE-labeled probe SEQ. ID. No. 12 (0.25
pmol) with 10-fold excess protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 14 as target. The procedure
was performed in hybridization buffer using melt temperatures from 40°C to 57.5°C
in 2.5°C steps, and selecting at 42°C. Figure 2 shows that the percent input RLU only
approached 50% in this assay, so the Tm was higher than the highest temperature tested.
An extrapolation can be made to estimate the Tm at about 58°C.
[0160] The high Tm estimated from Figure 2 suggested a stable detection probe:protection
probe hybridization complex and predicted good stability at higher temperatures. However,
it should be confirmed that the protection probe does not interfere with normal HPA
of the probe to its real target. To test this, AE-labeled probe SEQ. ID. No. 12 (0.01
pmol) was hybridized in Hybridization Buffer with protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 14
at a concentration range from equimolar to 100-fold excess. The detection probe:protection
probe hybridization complex was then used in a normal HPA reaction at 60°C as described
above; negative reactions contained no added target and positive reactions contained
excess oligonucleotide target of SEQ. ID. No. 13. An acceptable result would be that
positive and negative HPA signals were about the same in the presence or absence of
protection probe; especially that the negative reactions were not significantly increased
due to the presence of protection probe.
[0161] Table 3 provides results showing that protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 14 did not interfere
with positive or negative HPA for AE-labeled probe SEQ. ID. No. 12 in normal HPA conditions.
Positive HPA signals were about the same in the presence or absence of protection
probe, and negative HPA signals were not significantly increased with up to 100-fold
excess of protection probe compared to no protection probe.
Table 3
| PPO conc./ HPA |
0x |
1x |
2x |
5x |
10x |
50x |
100x |
| Negative |
362 |
352 |
351 |
371 |
398 |
430 |
401 |
| Positive |
91270 |
89089 |
91463 |
94903 |
94845 |
98583 |
93776 |
[0162] For optimal performance, it is very useful to design and choose a protection probe
matched for its required function, as demonstrated in Tables 1-3 and Figures 1 and
2. Protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 14 performed well in these assays for AE-labeled
probe SEQ. ID. No. 12, and would be expected to perform well in either Probe-in-Amp
or stabilizing the probe for long term storage in liquid hybridization buffer.
Example 4: Efficiency of Probe-In-Amp Transcription-Based Amplification Is Improved
With Protection Probe
[0163] A Probe-in-Amp experiment was done similar to Example 2, except that in some of the
reactions, the AE-labeled probe included at the beginning of the amplification was
prehybridized with a 5-fold or 10-fold excess of protection probe before being added
to the amplification reaction. The employed protection probe was designed to remain
hybridized to the AE-labeled probe during amplification. Hybridization of the detection
probe to the protection probe prevents the detection probe from hybridizing to the
amplicon during transcription-based amplification so it will not interfere with the
reverse transcriptase extension reaction on the amplicon template.
[0164] The AE-labeled RNA probe SEQ. ID. No. 9 specific for
M. avium rRNA amplicon generated with transcription-based amplification primers SEQ. ID. Nos.
10 and 11 was either a) added in Hybridization Buffer after amplification for a normal
HPA detection; b) added by itself to the reaction mixture in the enzyme reagent prior
to amplification; or c) prehybridized with a 5-fold or 10-fold excess of protection
probe SEQ. ID. No. 7 or 8 for 30 minutes at 42°C before to being added to the reaction
mixture in the enzyme reagent prior to amplification. Hybridization and detection
were performed for normal HPA or for Probe-in-Amp as described above. Results are
shown in Table 4.
Table 4
| Target input |
Normal HPA |
0x PPO |
5x PPO1 |
10x PPO1 |
5x PPO2 |
10x PPO2 |
| 0 fg |
7391 |
4149 |
4149 |
4149 |
4149 |
4149 |
| 25 fg |
264489 |
26958 |
68639 |
357306 |
523427 |
424783 |
| 250 fg |
1290650 |
626945 |
611522 |
522248 |
601930 |
605679 |
| "PPO1" refers to SEQ. ID. No. 8 and "PPO2" refers to SEQ. ID. No. 7. "Target input"
refers to amount of M. avium rRNA amplified. |
[0165] The effectiveness of the protection probe in decreasing inhibition of Probe-in-Amp
amplification is apparent especially when pre-hybridized to the probe in 10-fold excess
amplified at the 25 fg target level. Signal from Probe-in-Amp without protection probe
was about 27,000 RLU, but when the AE-labeled probe was protected with protection
probe 1 or protection probe 2, signals rose to about 350,000 to about 500,000 RLU,
a 20-fold increase in amplification efficiency. Signals at 250 fg of rRNA target were
not much higher, probably because the probe was reaching saturation with amplicon.
Normal HPA signals arc shown for comparison.
Example 5: Protection Probe Extends Stability of AE-Labeled Probe during Storage in
Solution
[0166] AE-labeled probes hybridized to complementary protection probes are more stable during
storage in solution. This example illustrates the increased stability in long term
storage of labeled detection probes with the labeled probe/protection probe combination
characterized and predicted to be acceptable in Example 3.
[0167] AE-labeled probe SEQ. ID. No. 12 (0.01 pmol) was prehybridized to a two-fold excess
of protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 14 at 42°C for 30 minutes and stored in 2x Hybridization
Buffer at 4°C and 25°C for up to 6 months. Stability of labeled probe hybridized to
protection probe was compared to probe without labeled probe stored in 2x Hybridization
Buffer at -20°C, 4°C and 25°C.
[0168] Aliquots were withdrawn at various time points, and the stability of the labeled
probe was quantitatively determined by HPA with excess complementary target (SEQ.
ID. No. 13). The amount of RLU remaining was plotted as the percentage of RLU remaining
compared to the initial signal on day 0. Two different aliquots of probe from each
storage condition were maintained, and 3 replicates for each were assayed by HPA at
each time point (RLUs from the 6 replicates for each condition were averaged). Results
for the 6 month stability study are shown in Figure 3.
[0169] A dramatic increase in stability in the AE-labeled probe is apparent by comparing
time points of AE-labeled probe alone versus AE-labeled probe hybridized to protection
probe. The AE-labeled probe was relatively stable at -20°C without protection probe.
However, at 4°C, labeled probe without protection probe degraded to 80% of original
signal after about 1 week, while with protection probe, the same AE-labeled probe
retained greater than 80% of its original RLU after 6 months. In addition, when hybridized
to the protection probe, the AE-labeled probe retained greater than 80% of its original
RLU at 6 months even at 25°C. Without protection probe, the probe lost 50% of its
original signal within 3 days (the first time point) at 25°C.
Example 6: Stability Of AE-Labeled Probe With Two Different Protection Probes
[0170] This example presents an experiment similar to Example 5, but with a different AE-labeled
probe, and compares stability in solution when hybridized to one of two complementary
protection probes. AE-labeled probe SEQ. ID. No. 15 (0.01 pmol) was prehybridized
to a 20-fold excess of protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 16 (PPOa in Figure 4) or a 10-fold
excess of protection probe SEQ. ID. No. 17 (PPOc in Figure 4) at 50°C for 8 minutes,
followed by a hybridization at 42°C for 8 minutes and storage in 2x Hybridization
Buffer at 4°C and 25°C for up to 6 months.
[0171] Stability of labeled probe hybridized to protection probes was compared to labeled
probe without protection probe stored in 2x Hybridization Buffer at -20°C, 4°C and
25°C. Aliquots were withdrawn at various time points, and the stability of the probe
was quantitatively determined by HPA with excess complementary target (SEQ. ID. No.
18). The amount of RLU remaining was plotted as the percentage of RLU remaining compared
to the initial signal on day 0. Two different probe aliquots from each storage condition
were maintained, and 3 replicates for each were assayed by HPA at each time point
(RLUs from the 6 replicates for each condition were averaged). Results for the 6 month
stability study are shown in Figure 4.
[0172] AE-labeled probe hybridized with protection probe was much more stable during storage
than labeled probe without protection probe. Labeled probe with protection probe ("PPOa"
in Figure 4) retained greater than 80% of its original signal after 6 months at 4°C
or 25°C. Labeled probe with protection probe ("PPOc" in Figure 4) retained greater
than 80% of its original signal after six months at 4°C, but dropped below 80% at
25°C after about 3 weeks. These results are compared to labeled probe without protection
probe, which lost 80% of original signal after less than a week at 25°C and after
about three weeks at 4°C.
[0173] In this study, protection probe "a" stabilized the AE-labeled probe significantly
better than protection probe "c"; and the labeled probe was about as stable at 25°C
with protection probe "a" as with protection probe "c" at 4°C. This was probably because
protection probe "a" is longer and had a higher Tm when hybridized to detection probe,
than protection probe "c".
SEQUENCE LISTING
[0174]
<110> GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED
<120> PROTECTION PROBES
<130> GP102-PCT
<140> to be assigned
<141> 2000-02-11
<150> 60/120,019 US
<151> 1999-02-12
<160> 18
<170> PatentIn Ver. 2.1
<210> 1
<211> 23
<212> RNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic detection probe with its terminal
3'OH blocked by an n-propyl group
<400> 1
ggaggauaug ucucagcgcu acc 23
<210> 2
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic detection probe with its terminal
3'OH blocked by an n-propyl group
<400> 2
ggaggatatg tctcagcgct acc 23
<210> 3
<211> 47
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic amplification primer
<400> 3
aatttaatac gactcactat agggagacca ggccacttcc gctaacc 47
<210> 4
<211> 24
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic amplification primer
<400> 4
cgcggaacag gctaaaccgc acgc 24
<210> 5
<211> 38
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic helper probe
<400> 5
cggctgagag gcagtacaga aagtgtcgtg gttagcgg 38
<210> 6
<211> 36
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic helper probe
<400> 6
gggtaaccgg gtaggggttg tgtgtgcggg gttgtg 36
<210> 7
<211> 13
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic protection probe with its terminal
3'OH blocked by an n-propyl group
<400> 7
atgcgtcttg agg 13
<210> 8
<211> 11
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic protection probe with its terminal
3'OH blocked by an n-propyl group
<400> 8
tgcgtcttga g 11
<210> 9
<211> 19
<212> RNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic detection probe
<400> 9
ggaccucaag acgcauguc 19
<210> 10
<211> 55
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic amplification primer
<400> 10
gaaattaata cgactcacta tagggagacc acagccgtca ccccaccaac aagct 55
<210> 11
<211> 31
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic amplification primer
<400> 11
gggataagcc tgggaaactg ggtctaatac c 31
<210> 12
<211> 24
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic detection probe
<400> 12
gtcttgtggt ggaaagcgct ttag 24
<210> 13
<211> 47
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic target sequence
<400> 13
ctaaagcgct ttccaccaca agacatgcat cccgtggtcc tatccgg 47
<210> 14
<211> 17
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic protection probe with its terminal
3'OH blocked by an n-propyl group
<400> 14
gctttccacc acaagac 17
<210> 15
<211> 24
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic detection probe
<400> 15
agagtccgta gagcgatgag aacg 24
<210> 16
<211> 15
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic protection probe
<400> 16
catcgctcta cggac 15
<210> 17
<211> 14
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic protection probe
<400> 17
cgctctacgg actc 14
<210> 18
<211> 24
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: a synthetic target sequence
<400> 18
cgttctcatc gctctacgga ctct 24
1. Eine Zusammensetzung zum Nachweis des Vorhandenseins einer Zielnukleinsäure in einer
Probe umfassend:
einen Nachweissonde: Schutzsonde Hybridisierungskomplex bestehend aus einer Nachweisoligonukleotidsonde
umfassend einen Marker der gegenüber chemischer oder enzymatischer Veränderung empfänglich
ist, und
eine Schutzoligonukleotidsonde umfassend eine 3' Block-Gruppe,
wobei die Schutzsonde und die Nachweissonde aneinander hybridisiert sind,
wobei die Schutzsonde kürzer als die Nachweissonde ist oder kürzer und derart nicht
vollständig komplementär zu der Nachweissonde ist, dass eine oder mehrere Nukleotidbasen
der Schutzsonde nicht über Watson-Crick Wasserstoffbrückenbindung Wasserstoffbrücken
mit der Nachweissonde bilden,
wobei der Marker eine labile Esterbindung oder eine labile Thioesterbindung umfasst
und in dem Hybridisierungskomplex nicht empfänglich gegenüber der Veränderung ist,
und
wobei der Hybridisierungskomplex, der aus der Nachweissonde und der Schutzsonde gebildet
wird, eine niedrigere Tm besitzt, als ein Hybridisierungskomplex, der aus der Nachweissonde
und der Zielnukleinsäure gebildet wird, so dass die Nachweissonde geneigt ist, einen
stabileren Komplex mit der Zielnukleinsäure zu bilden als mit der Schutzsonde.
2. Die Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1 ferner umfassend eine wässrige Lösung, wobei der
Marker in Abwesenheit des Nachweissonde: Schutzsonde Hybridisierungskomplexes gegenüber
der Veränderung in der Lösung empfänglich ist und die Veränderung einen Verlust der
Nachweisbarkeit des Markersignals verursacht.
3. Die Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 2, wobei der Hybridisierungskomplex, der aus der
Nachweissonde und der Schutzsonde gebildet wird, in einer Lösung, die 0,05 M Lithiumsuccinat,
pH 5,0, 0,6 M LiCl, 1% w/v LLS, 10 mM EDTA und 10 mM EGTA enthält, eine Tm besitzt,
die mindestens ungefähr 4°C niedriger ist, als ein Hybridisierungskomplex, der sich
aus der Nachweissonde und einer vollständig komplementären Zielnukleinsäure bildet.
4. Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 3, wobei der Hybridisierungskomplex, der aus der Nachweissonde
und der Schutzsonde gebildet wird, in der Lösung eine Tm besitzt, die mindestens 5°C
niedriger ist, als der Hybridisierungskomplex der sich aus der Nachweissonde und der
vollständig komplementären Zielnukleinsäure bildet.
5. Die Zusammensetzung nach einem der Ansprüche 2 - 4, wobei der Marker bei 37°C in einer
Lösung, die aus 0,05 M Lithiumsuccinat, pH 5,0, 0,6 M LiCl, 1% w/v LLS, 10 mM EDTA
und 10 mM EGTA besteht, hydrolysiert werden kann und die Schutzsonde den Marker vor
der Hydrolyse schützt.
6. Die Zusammensetzung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 - 5, wobei der Marker ein Lumineszenzmarker
ist.
7. Die Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 6, wobei der Marker ein Chemolumineszenzmarker ist.
8. Die Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 7, wobei die Chemolumineszenz des Markers über ein
elektronisch angeregtes ggf. substituiertes N-Alkylacridon erzeugt wird.
9. Die Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 8, wobei der Marker einen ggf. substituierten Acridiniumester
umfasst.
10. Die Zusammensetzung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 - 9, wobei die Nachweissonde ein modifiziertes
Nachweisoligonukleotid ist, wobei jede Modifikation unabhängig ausgewählt wird aus
der Gruppe bestehend aus:
einer 2'-modifizierten Ribose,
einer modifizierten Internukleotidbindung,
einer modifizierten stickstoffhaltigen Base,
einer Peptidnukleinsäure, und
einer 3' Block-Gruppe.
11. Die Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 10, wobei jede Modifikation an dem modifizierten
Nachweisoligonukleotid unabhängig auswählt wird aus der Gruppe bestehend aus: 2'-Methoxyribose,
2'-Haloribose, einer Methylphosphonatbindung, einer Phosphorothioatbindung, einer
Alkyl-Block-Gruppe, einem 3'-3' invertierten Nukleotid und einem 3' Desoxynukleosid.
12. Die Zusammensetzung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 - 11, wobei die Schutzsonde eine oder
mehrere weitere Modifikation umfasst, die unabhängig ausgewählt werden aus der Gruppe
bestehend aus: 2'-Methoxyribose, 2'-Haloribose, einer Methylphosphonatbindung und
einer Phosphorothioatbindung.
13. Die Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 12, wobei die Schutzsonde kürzer als die Nachweissonde
ist.
14. Die Zusammensetzung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 - 13, wobei die Schutzsonde gegenüber
der Nachweissonde in mindestens einem ungefähr 2-fachen Überschuss vorhanden ist.
15. Die Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 14, wobei die Schutzsonde gegenüber der Nachweissonde
in mindestens einem 4-fachen Überschuss vorhanden ist.
16. Die Zusammensetzung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 - 15, ferner dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Hybridisierungskomplex die Nachweissonde daran hindert an die Zielnukleinsäure
oder an das Komplementär der Zielnukleinsäure zu hybridisieren, wenn er während einer
enzymatischen Amplifikationsreaktion der Zielnukleinsäure anwesend ist.
17. Ein Verfahren zum Nachweis, ob eine Zielnukleinsäuresequenz in einer Probe vorhanden
ist, umfassend die Schritte:
a) Erzeugen einer Reaktionsmischung, die eine Zusammensetzung umfasst, die einen Nachweissonde:
Schutzsonde Hybridisierungskomplex umfasst, der aus
einer Nachweissonde, die einen Marker umfasst, der gegenüber chemischer oder enzymatischer
Veränderungen empfänglich ist und
einer Schutzsonde besteht,
wobei die Schutzsonde und die Nachweissonde aneinander hybridisiert sind,
wobei die Schutzsonde kürzer als die Nachweissonde und/oder derart nicht perfekt komplementär
zu der Nachweissonde ist, dass eine oder mehrere Nukleotidbasen der Schutzsonde mit
der Nachweissonde nicht über Watson-Crick Wasserstoffbrückenbindungen Wasserstoffbrücken
bilden,
wobei der Marker in dem Hybridisierungskomplex nicht empfänglich gegenüber der Veränderung
ist, und
wobei der Hybridisierungskomplex, der aus der Nachweissonde und der Schutzsonde gebildet
wird eine niedrigere Tm besitzt als ein Hybridisierungskomplex der aus der Nachweissonde
und der Zielnukleinsäuresequenz gebildet wird, so dass die Nachweissonde geneigt ist,
mit der Zielnukleinsäure einen stabileren Komplex zu bilden als mit der Schutzsonde,
b) Hinzugeben der Reaktionsmischung zu der Probe, und
c) Nachweis ob die Nachweissonde an die Zielsequenz hybridisiert ist unter Nachweisbedingungen
als Hinweis darauf, dass die Zielsequenz in der Probe vorhanden ist, wobei die Nachweissonde
unter den Nachweisbedingungen nicht stabil an die Schutzsonde hybridisiert ist.
18. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, wobei die Reaktionsmischung vor dem Nachweisschritt
c) Amplifizierungsbedingungen ausgesetzt wird, so dass die Zielsequenz, wenn vorhanden,
verwendet wird um amplifizierte Nukleinsäure zu bilden, wobei unter den Amplifikationsbedingungen
die Nachweissonde an die Schutzsonde hybridisiert ist und Nachweis im Nachweisschritt,
ob die Nachweissonde an die amplifizierte Nukleinsäurezielsequenz hybridisiert ist.
19. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 18, wobei die Amplifikationsbedingungen transkriptions-basierte
Amplifikationsbedingungen sind.
20. Das Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 17 - 19, wobei unter den Nachweisbedingungen
eine Nachweissonde: Zielnukleinsäure Tm mindestens 5°C größer ist als eine Nachweissonde:
Schutzsonde Tm.
21. Das Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 17 - 20, wobei die Temperatur der Nachweisbedingungen
mindestens ungefähr 3°C niedriger ist, als die Nachweissonde: Zielnukleinsäure Tm,
vorausgesetzt, dass die Nachweissonde: Schutzsonde Tm mindestens ungefähr 2°C niedriger
ist als die Temperatur der Nachweisbedingungen.
22. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 21, wobei die Nachweissonde: Zielnukleinsäure Tm mindestens
8°C größer ist als die Nachweissonde: Schutzsonde Tm.
23. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 22, wobei die Temperatur der Nachweisbedingungen mindestens
5°C niedriger ist als die Nachweissonde: Zielnukleinsäure Tm.
24. Das Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 17 - 23, wobei der Marker ein chemolumineszentes
Molekül ist und die Veränderung einen Verlust der Nachweisbarkeit des Markersignals
verursacht.