FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates to packaging of food products, specifically food products
containing protein, and more specifically fresh red meat, that enhances the refrigerated
shelf life of such foods.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] In the modern distribution and marketing of food products, many different packaging
materials are used. One type of food packaging material is plastic film. Many different
kinds of plastic film are used, varying both in composition and structure, and depending
on the specific application.
[0003] Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) film is a predominant plastic film used to wrap retail-cut
red meat and other products like fresh fish or poultry. PVC is low-cost relative to
other plastic films and has many desirable properties such as clarity, oxygen transmission,
flexibility, toughness, heat sealability, elastic recovery and processability. Traditionally,
PVC films are used in a polystyrene foam tray/overwrap application which has several
drawbacks. The packages wrapped in this fashion have both poor seal integrity, i.e.,
they often leak, and poor abuse resistance, i.e., they often become punctured or tear.
The poor seal integrity of PVC overwrap films arises because the PVC is tack welded
rather than hermetically seated. Thus, the liquid purge or juices which exude from
the meat products will leak through a tack sealed PVC overwrapped tray and result
in a package that is unsightly and messy from a consumer viewpoint, and has limited
shelf life. Futher, the packages require absorption pads to absorb purge.
[0004] Furthermore, the shelf life for fresh red meat, wrapped in PVC is at best only a
few days. Freshly-cut red meat has a purple-red color which relatively few ultimate
consumers would associate with freshness. This color quickly changes to the generally-acceptable
bright red color when the fresh meat is oxygenated by exposure to air, which changes
myoglobins in the meat to oxymyoglobins. This change is generally referred to as "blooming."
Once red meat has "bloomed", however, the refrigerated shelf life of such meat packaged
in conventional polystyrene foam trays with PVC overwrap is relatively short, lasting
at best about 2-3 days. Thus, better alternatives to PVC are sought.
[0005] In the search for alternatives to PVC film, various monolayer olefin films, particularly
polyethylene (PE) films have been considered, but most are not as commercially acceptable
and do not provide better performance. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) is much too
inelastic and lacking in heat sealability to be useful as a commercial wrap, while
the various low density polyethylenes, e.g. low-density polyethylene (LDPE), linear
low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), ultra low-density polyethylene (ULDPE), etc., do
not possess sufficient elastic recovery, and the film retains impressions or dents
caused by handling of packaged goods by potential purchasers while inspecting the
contents, thereby reducing the sale value of the food products. The use of non-toxic
plasticizers, such as corn oil, has not proven satisfactory, particularly with respect
to temperature stability.
[0006] Besides freshness, the packages must have integrity and shelf-appeal. The packaging
of food articles such as poultry, fresh red meat, and processed meat products requires
tough, puncture resistant, yet flexible, film materials. The film materials should
be suitable for use in fabricating bags or pouches for packaging such food articles
by the shrink-wrap method. Generally, the shrink-wrap method is predicated upon the
heat-shrinking property of the bag. Food products are placed in the bag and thereafter
exposed to heat, such as a flow of hot air, infra-red radiation, hot water and the
like, thereby causing the bag to shrink and come into intimate contact with the contours
of the food article. Packages prepared by this method have desirable shelf-appeal,
which adds to sale value of the wrapped article. The package contents are kept in
a hygienic condition, and shoppers can examine the quality of the food article from
all angles.
[0007] For such shrink-wrap applications, the film material must be stretchable in order
to provide a shrinkable film that will heat-shrink within a specified range of percentages,
e.g. from about 30 to 60 percent at 90°C in both the machine and transverse directions.
Further, the film must be heat sealable in order to be able to fabricate bags from
the film, and the heat sealed seams must not pull apart during the heat shrinking
operation, In addition, the film must resist puncturing by sharp edges, such as bone
edges, during the heat-shrinking operation.
[0008] Various packaging methods are described in the art. Lustig et al., U.S. Pat. No.
4,963,419 discloses a multi-layer film for use in packaging primal and subprimal meat
cuts. The films disclosed in Lustig aim to mimimize the transmission of oxygen to
prevent spoilage. The multi-layer film comprises a first outer layer containing a
heat-sealable thermoplastic polymer; a core layer comprising an oxygen barrier film;
and a second outer layer comprising an ethylene polymer having siloxane cross-linking
bonds. In another embodiment, the multi-layer film contains a second core layer containing
an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, located between the barrier core layer and the
second outer layer.
[0009] In the mid-1970's, DuPont introduced their "Bivac®" packaging system for packaging
frozen fresh meats. The Bivac® method involved packaging freshly-cut red meat in ionomerfilm,
vacuum sealing and immediately flash-freezing the package. This method captured the
red color and freshness of the freshly-cut red meat and maintained it in this state
when stored at 0°F (-17.8°C) and not exposed to light for six months ormore. The ionomer
film used in the Bivac® was mono-layer with essentially no shrinkage. Skin-packaging
apparatus and methods covering the Bivac® process are disclosed in U.S. Patents 3,491,504,
3,706,174 and 4,069,643, the latter two aimed at packaging large items such as subprimals
of meat.
[0010] A need still exists for improved packaging materials and methods to prolong the refrigerated
shelf life of fresh foods, particularly fresh red meat, while maintaining package
integrity and shelf-appeal, and overcoming the known drawbacks of conventional PVC
packaging methods.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0011] The invention herein provides a method for packaging fresh food to enhance the refrigerated
shelf life of such food comprising:
a. enclosing the food within a film structure having one or more layers, wherein one
layer is a food contact layer that comprises a polymer selected from the group consisting
of ionomers, acid copolymers, and blends or copolymers comprising ionomers and/or
acid copolymers;
b. vacuum sealing the film structure on its perimeter to achieve a sealed pouch encasing
the food;
c. applying minimal heat for a minimal time necessary to shrink the sealed pouch and/or
effect a secondary seal, as the case may be, such that the food surface is placed
in intimate contact with the food contact layer and any purge is contained; and
d. maintaining a cold chain throughout steps a through c. and thereafter, save for
the minimum time required to heat in step c, wherein the film structure was made by
an extrusion blown process employing a blowing ratio (BUR) in the range of about 3
to about 7.
[0012] The invention also provides a package for fresh red meat or poultry to enhance the
refrigerated shelf life of such food comprising:
a. fresh red meat or poultry;
b. a vacuum-sealed film pouch encasing the raw meat or poultry, said pouch having
one or more layers, wherein one layer is a food contact layer that comprises a film
comprising a polymer selected from the group consisting of ionomers, acid copolymers,
blends or copolymers comprising ionomers and/or acid copolymers and the food contact
layer is in intimate contact with the fresh red meat or poultry wherein the film pouch
was made by an extrusion blown process employing a blow-up ratio (BUR) in the range
of 3 to 7.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURE
[0013] FIG. 1 is a graph of off-odor scores for inside round beef steaks (semimembranosus
muscle) held under simulated retail display conditions at 2-3°C. The presence and
degree of off-odor characteristics is evaluated using the following scale: 1 = no
off odor, 2 = slight off odor, 3 = small off odor, 4 = moderate off odor, 5 = extreme
off odor.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Definitions
[0014] In this disclosure, the word "copolymer" means a polymer polymerized from two or
more monomers, and includes terpolymers. The more specific descriptions, e.g. 'ethylene
carboxylic acid copolymer', and the like, are meant to include copolymers which may
also have a third monomer present. The term "direct copolymer" means a copolymer made
by polymerization of monomers together, at the same time, as distinct from a graft
copolymer where a monomer is polymerized on an existing polymer chain.
[0015] Ethylene/acid copolymers and their corresponding ionomers are well known in the art
to be copolymers of ethylene with an olefinically unsaturated organic mono- or di-acid
such as acrylic or methacrylic acid, or maleic acid or fumaric acid or their anhydrides,
the acid (or anhydride) comprising 0.5 to 50 mole percent of the total polymeric material.
The ethylene/acid copolymers and their methods of preparation are well known in the
art and are disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. Numbers 3,264,272, 3,404,134, 3,355,319
and 4,321,337. The copolymers are termed ionomers when the acid is neutralized in
whole or in part to produce a salt. The cations for said salts are usually metal ions
such as sodium, potassium, zinc or the like. Suitable acid copolymer and ionomers
are available from the DuPont Company under the trade names Nucrel® and Surlyn®, respectively.
[0016] As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,264,272 to Rees, an ionomer may be defined as a direct
copolymer of alphaolefins having the general formula RCH=CH
2 wherein R is a radical selected from the class consisting of hydrogen and alkyl radicals
having from 1 to 8 carbon atoms, the olefin content of said copolymer being at least
50 mole percent based upon said copolymer, and an α, β-ethylenically unsaturated mono-carboxylic
acid, the acid monomer content of said copolymer being from 0.6 to 50 weight percent
(0.2 to 25 mole percent), preferably 8 to 20 weight percent, and more preferably 10
to 19 weight percent, based upon the copolymer, said copolymer having a melt index
(by ASTM 1238, condition e) within the range of 0.1 to 15, said monocarboxylic acid
copolymer containing uniformly distributed throughout the copolymer a metal ion having
an ionized valence of 1 to 3 inclusive, wherein at least 10 percent of the carboxylic
acid groups of said monovalent carboxylic acid copolymer are neutralized by said metal
ions and exist in an ionic state.
[0017] The term ionomer is also meant to include terionomers in which a third unsaturated
monomer has been copolymerized with ethylene and unsaturated acid. Examples of these
monomers are vinyl acetate and (meth)acrylate esters such as methyl acrylate, ethyl
acrylate and isobutyl acrylate. For instance, Surlyn® 1855 is a zinc-neutralized terionomer
containing 10 wt. % copolymerized isobutyl acrylate. Blends of these terionomers with
dipolymer ethylene-unsaturated acid ionomers are also included within the definition,
such as blends of Surlyn® 1855 (terionomer) with Surlyn® 1707 (dipolymer ionomer).
[0018] By "blow-up ratio" is meant the ratio of the diameter of a film tube in blown film
manufacturing after expansion to the diameter of the film prior to expansion, wherein
the expansion is typically effected by air under pressure.
[0019] By "purge" is meant any liquid, juices, blood, etc. that are expelled from meat or
poultry over time.
[0020] By "high shrinkage" is meant film shrinkage greater than 30% in each of the machine
and transverse direction.
[0021] By "cold chain" is meant maintaining the environmental temperature of the food product
and/or resulting package in the range of 0°C to 8°C, preferably 0°C to 6°C, and more
preferably 0°C to 4°C.
[0022] By "vacuum sealing" is meant any method of sealing films in an evacuated chamber,
typically achieved by a heated sealing bar or wire to seal two layers of film, but
also including applying mechanical seals, such as a metal or plastic clip, to effect
hermetic closure of the films. The resulting product is packaged and held under vacuum.
[0023] The use of "consisting essentially of" is meant to encompass recited elements and
additional unspecified ingredients that would not affect the basic and novel characteristics
of the composition defined in the balance of the claim.
Description
[0024] The invention herein provides a method for packaging fresh food to enhance the refrigerated
shelf life of such foods. Of particular interest is the packaging of protein-containing
foods such as fresh meat and poultry. Present methods of packaging fresh meat in retail
stores usually allow a maximum shelf life of 2-3 days.
[0025] The "shelf life" of food products varies and is limited. In a retail environment,
food shelf life is that finite time that a product remains of satisfactory sale quality
before retail purchase. The shelf life of a food product depends on its chemical nature
and the way it has been processed, packaged, distributed and stored. Processed foods
(canned, dried, frozen) have limited shelf life in terms of food quality. They may
lose some nutritive value and undergo subtle chemical and physical changes on long-term
storage even though they may not be spoiled. Fresh foods, being more fragile, spoil
primarily by bacterial deterioration (usually evidenced by off-odor) which reduces
their quality.
[0026] The shelf life of pre-packaged fresh meats is influenced by microbial growth and
environmental temperature. Microorganisms decrease shelf life by causing discoloration
due to the oxidation of the meat pigment myoglobin to metmyoglobin. The environmental
temperature affects the microbial growth rate, and hence the degradation of the meat
itself. A foul-smelling odor may be detected at the first signs of degradation of
the meat. The microorganisms primarily responsible for bacterial degradation in packaged
meats include: homo and heterofermentative lactobacilli, aeromonas, pyschrotrophic
enterobacteriaceae, yeasts, molds, listeria, facultative anaerobes, clostridium bacillus,
and lactobacillus. The microorganisms most likely to flourish under refrigerated conditions,
are primarily the psychrophilics, chiefly of the genus pseudomonas.
[0027] As well, the practical shelf life is affected by consumer preferences, one of which
is the preference for the bright red color of meat that has bloomed. Four parameters
are known to influence meat color: surface dehydration, temperature, oxygen requirements
of the meat and bacterial contamination. Slight dehydration may be considered helpful
for desirable fresh meat color, but is deleterious when it occurs to any great extent.
Color changes are effected in a number of ways. Sanitation in the packaging operation
is of paramount importance in maintaining satisfactory color. A close relationship
between the number of
Pseudomonas sp, present on beef cuts and the rate of discoloration has been observed. The choice
of lighting will also affect the meat color. Incandescent light in close proximity
can cause rapid discoloration because the heat generated by the lights increase the
surface temperature of the meat. Ultraviolet light can cause rapid discoloration,
even though it can control microbial growth on the meat surface. See, N.G. Marriott
et al., "Color Stability of Prepackaged Fresh Beef as Influenced by Pre-Display Environments",
Food Technology, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 104-106 (1967).
[0028] The number of
Pseudomonas sp are also known to influence the development of foul smelling odors, an indication
to the consumer of meat deterioration. Eliminating the growth of the pseudomonas should
delay the development of unpleasant odors and hence-extend the shelf life for such
meats.
[0029] Applicants have found a method for packaging fresh food, particularly fresh red meat,
and a package related thereto, wherein a combination of optimal features can prolong
the refrigerated shelf life of the packaged food. The method provides a film structure
having one or more layers, wherein one layer is a food contact layer, the food contact
layer ensures good contact and adhesion between the packaging film layer and the fresh
food (most likely due to both the composition of the food contact layer and high shrinkage
of the film structure), the film structure has an optimal rate of oxygen transmission
to the fresh food, while heating to shrink and/or seal the packaging film structure
is minimized and the packaged food is maintained in a "cold chain" under normal sanitation
procedures. The refrigerated shelf life, typically in a retail environment, is prolonged
or enhanced because, e.g., in the case of red meat, fresh odor, color and appearance
of the meat is retained for a longer time period than is possible with conventional
packaging methods. Conventional packaging, e.g. plasticized PVC, generally provides
a refrigerated shelf life for red meat of - about 2-3 days. The technology of the
invention herein can be expected to extend the refrigerated shelf life for red meat
to about 4-6 days, or perhaps even longer.
[0030] While not bound by any particular theory or explanation, Applicants believe that
the various features of their invention combine to achieve the result of enhanced
refrigerated shelf life for packaged foods. For instance, given that the film structure
comprises ionomers or acid copolymers (discussed more below), Applicants believe that
there is a corresponding optimum window for the oxygen transmission rate for such
films that allows red meat to maintain a red bloom yet also minimizes degradation
of the meat under refrigeration.
[0031] The rate of oxygen transmission to the fresh food is achieved by the use of a film
structure having one or more layers wherein one layer is a food-contact layer comprising
an ionomer or acid copolymer film, provided the other layers in a multi-layer film
have the same or higher oxygen transmission. The ionomer or acid copolymer film, and
thereby the film structure, preferably has an oxygen transmission rate ranging from
1500 to 9000 cc/m
2-day-atm, more preferably 2000 to 6000, and most preferably 2500 to 5500 cc/m
2-day-atm for a 40-55 micron thick film tested at 23°C and 50% relative humidity per
ASTM D-3985. Examples of such films are films made from DuPont Surlyn® ionomer resin,
particularly Surlyn® 1707 ionomer resin, and DuPont Nucrel® acid copolymer resin,
both commercially available from DuPont, Wilmington, DE. A monolayer film made from
a blend of Surlyn® 1707 and terionomer Surlyn®. 1855 is also suitable. Typically the
ionomer or acid copolymer film ranges from 40-70 microns in thickness.
[0032] Further, the use of ionomer or acid copolymer film is advantageous for packaging
protein-containing food products since these films adhere well to the food, and can
thereby help to minimize purge and extend shelf life. So long as the heating used
to seal and/or shrink the film in packaging the food is minimized (both in duration
and temperature), the method of packaging fresh food, particularly fresh red meat
claimed herein can extend the refrigerated shelf life of such meats. This is especially
useful for packaging meats for retail sale, though this method would be equally useful
for packaging subprimal and primal meat cuts, which are often then enclosed in oxygen-impermeable
"mother bags", for transport from slaughter houses to retail markets. Similarly, the
invention herein may also be used to package retail cuts of meat that may then be
enclosed in oxygen-impermeable "mother bags", preferably flushed with CO
2 or other inert gas. This would facilitate meat preparation at regional locations
and subsequent transport to retail markets. In this way, the packaged retail cuts
of meat prepared at the regional locations can be considered "case ready".
[0033] The film structure is preferably a monolayer film, though multilayer films are contemplated.
Additional layers of films comprising polyethylenes, ethylene vinyl acetate, and/or
polyethylenes made with metallocene catalysts may be used, often to impart bulk or
mechanical integrity. If a coextrusion is employed, the innermost layer contacting
the food ("food contact layer") should be made of acid copolymer or ionomer, and the
oxygen transmission rate of the other layers must be the same or more than that of
the food contact layer, such that the oxygen transmission rate ("OTR") of the total
film must be in the range specified above. The food contact layer is preferably an
acid copolymer film or ionomer film, more preferably an ionomer film, and most preferably
a high-shrinkable ionomer film. The ionomer resin used in the preferred films preferably
has a melt index ranging from 0.7 to 3.0 dg/min (by ASTM 1238, condition e) and density
ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 g/cc.
[0034] In addition to acid copolymers or ionomers, the food contact layer may optionally
comprise additional polymers or additives (e.g., color concentrates, UV stabilizers,
anti-stat agents or other processing aids) so long as they do not affect the basic
and novel characteristics of the food contact layer as explained herein. For example,
it is anticipated that polyolefins or olefin copolymers containing a copolymerized
unsaturated ester or higher olefin comonomer could be blended with the acid copolymers
or ionomers, so long as the key characteristics of the acid copolymer or ionomers
were not affected. It is expected that up to 30% by weight of polyolefin, based on
the total weight of the food contact layer, could be added without adverse consequences.
[0035] The films may be fabricated using blown film technology, typically covering blow-up
ratios (BURs) from 3: 1 to 4:1, as well as technology using high BURs, e.g., greater
than 4:1, and biaxial-orientation techniques, wherein the higher BUR's are preferred.
These are well-known in the art, including the "double bubble process" described in
U.S. Pat. No. 3,456,044 (Pahlke), incorporated by reference herein, among others,
though such methods have not ordinarily been applied to ionomeroracid copolymer films.
Biaxially-oriented films may also be made by a tenter-frame technique, such as that
used for oriented polypropylene.
[0036] In the method of the invention, the fresh food product is enclosed within the film
structure, the film structure being multilayer or preferably monolayer. Typically
this is accomplished by using two rolls of film structure which are draped around
the food and sealed along the longitudinal ends to form a tube, and subsequently cut
between food items to separate them, or by using bags or pouches of the film structure
having an opening to introduce the food product, among other methods. Certainly, the
same could also be accomplished by methods employing a single roll of film which is
folded to form a tube surrounding the food items, sealed along the longitudinal end,
and subsequently cut between food items.
[0037] Once the food is placed in the bag or pouch or between two rolls of film structure,
the film structure is vacuum sealed on the perimeter to achieve a sealed pouch encasing
the food. This is typically accomplished by sealing with a heated bar or wire in a
vacuum chamber. Alternatively, a metal or plastic clip can be used to effect the hermetic
closure of a pouch or tube. The vacuum is thereby applied during sealing, and after
removing the sealed pouch from the vacuum chamber, atmospheric pressure causes the
sealed pouch to collapse around the food and remains in intimate contact with the
food.
[0038] In the case of shrinkable films, heat is applied after the vacuum-sealing to shrink
the sealed pouch, e.g., by passing the sealed pouch through a hot air tunnel. This
ensures intimate contact between the food product and the sealed pouch, in addition
to that provided from the vacuum sealing. The shrinkable film preferably has a shrinkage
of at least 25% in each of the machine and transverse directions, and more preferably
has a shrinkage ranging from 30% to 70% in each of the machine and transverse directions.
[0039] In the case of non-shrinkable films, or films having a shrinkage of less than 15-25%
in each direction, a secondary seal is effected by application of heat to the sealed
pouch, which causes the two layers of the bag or pouch that are not in contact with
the fresh food product to seal, i.e. a "secondary seal" In addition to the seal on
the perimeter. Such methods are well-known and are disclosed in e.g., U.S. Pat. No.
3,491,504 to Young et al., which describes a method and apparatus for vacuum skin
packaging.
[0040] Typically the heat application will be conducted by using a heated tunnel or bath,
though any suitable method of heating is contemplated, e.g., infra-red heating. In
either case of heat application for the final sealing, the amount of heat is minimal
and is applied for a minimal amount of time. The heat is applied only for a time sufficient
to shrink shrinkable film or to effect a secondary seal for non-shrinkabib film. Immediately
following, the package is retumed to the cold chain. The time for heating is minimizedto
minimize the heat experienced by the food and any potential bacteria growth. As known
to the skilled artisan, the required temperature and time will depend on many factors,
e.g., the thickness and composition of the film structure itself, the types of heating
apparatus used, as well as the meat cut selected.
[0041] Whether the film structure comprises high-shrinkage film or not, the resulting package
has high integrity and effectively contains the purge (i.e. juices that exude from
meat over time) within the meat. This is also believed to help maintain the freshness
and maximize the refrigerated shelf life of the meat. Further, in the case of the
preferred ionomer or acid copolymer film layers, it is well-known that ionomer films
adhere well to food products containing proteins. The intimate contact between the
meat surface and the film, plus superior adherence due to the shrinking force or the
seconday sealing,-also serve to contain purge and further enhance the refrigerated
shelf life. To optimize the adherence, the cations used in the ionomer film are preferably
sodium or zinc, or mixtures thereof.
[0042] The present invention also provides a package for fresh red meat or poultry. The
foregoing description and various embodiments apply equally well to such claimed package.
The package comprises the meat or poultry encased in a sealed film pouch having one
or more layers. One layer is a food contact layer comprising an acid copolymer or
ionomer film, preferably ionomer film, wherein the film pouch has an oxygen transmission
rate of 1500 to 9000 cc/m
2-day atm (preferably 2000-6000 cc/m
2-day-atm) for a 40-55 micron thick film tested at 23°C and 50% relative humidity per
ASTM D-3985, and preferably high shrinkage. The film pouch is made by an extrusion
blown process employing a blow-up ratio (BUR) in the range of 3 to 7. The food pouch
preferably comprises a biaxially-oriented heat-shrinkable film. The shrinkage is preferably
in the range of 25% to 70% in each of the machine and transverse directions.
EXAMPLES
Examples 1-3 and Comparative Examples A-C
[0043] A six day test was run to compare the freshness of meats wrapped per the invention
herein to meats wrapped by conventional means. The cuts of red meat used were the
following: ground beef, rib eye (Delmonico cut) and round steak. Samples were taken
from the same animal for each comparison. For each cut of meat, one sample was wrapped
in a film bag made from highly shrinkable 55 micron thick film made from DuPont Surlyn®
1707 ionomer resin (Examples 1-3) and one sample was wrapped in a standard, commercially
available plasticized PVC film (Resinite), wherein the meat lays in a polystyrene
tray with an absorption pad (Examples A-C). Surlyn® is a registered trademark of DuPont.
Surlyn® ionomer resin is available from DuPont, Wilmington, DE.
[0044] The meatwas cut in a refrigerated area. Vacuum sealing and thermal shrinking of the
packages was conducted outside of the refrigerated area, though the time was kept
to a minimum, i.e., no more than a few minutes. The shrinkage time and temperature
was selected to minimize thermal damage to the meat samples.
[0045] The samples were then kept at 4°C for the length of the test inside a lighted, refrigerated
area within a commercial supermarket. Special lighting that reduces light-induced
damage to meat was used. The refrigerated chambers got two de-icing cycles per day
in which warm air at 15°C was released for 10 minutes.
[0046] Four supermarket meat managers judged the relative color and odor of all samples
every day starting one day after the test started through the fifth day after the
test started. The color was rated as either equivalent (=) or ranked 1 and 2, with
1 being the better of the two samples. Odor was rated as simply yes (Y) when a foul
odor was detected and no (N) when no foul odor was detected. The testers also judged
whether the meat could be: (1) sold as-is; (2) must be downgraded to a "bonus buy"
for quick sale; (3) must be remixed and ground for quick sale; or (4) could no longer
be sold. These results are listed in the "Sale Call" rows. The judgments of the four
testers are compiled in the results shown in Table I.
TABLE I
| |
DAY 1 |
DAY 2 |
DAY 3 |
DAY 4 |
DAY 5 |
| CO |
CO |
CO |
CO |
CO |
| Ex. 1 Ground beef |
= N |
= N |
1 N |
I N |
I N |
| Ex. A Ground beef |
= N |
= N |
2 Y |
2 Y |
2 Y |
| SALE CALL |
both (1) |
bath (1) |
Both (2) |
2-(3); A -(4) |
2-(3); A -(4) |
| Ex.2 Rib eye |
= N |
= N |
1 N |
1 N |
I N |
| Ex.B Rib eye |
= N |
= N |
2 Y |
2 Y |
2 Y |
| SALE CALL |
both (1) |
both (1) |
3 -(1); B-(2) |
3-(1); B-(2) |
3-(1); B -(2) |
| Ex.3 Top round |
= N |
= N |
1 N |
1 N |
I N |
| Ex. C Top round |
= N |
= N |
2 Y |
2 Y |
2 Y |
| SALE CALL |
both(1) |
both(1) |
Both (1) |
4-(1);C-(2) |
4-(1);C-(4) |
| C = Color |
| O = Odor |
[0047] The results in Table I show that through Day 2 (48 hours), the meat samples in either
package were essentially equivalent in color and lacked any noticeable foul odor.
By Day 3 (72 hours) the results changed. All of the comparative examples (A-C), in
which the meat was wrapped in conventional PVC, emitted noticeable foul odors on Day
3 and through the remainder of the test, evidence of degradation of the meat. None
of Examples 1-3 emitted any detectable foul odor through Day 5 (120 hours). Further,
Examples 1-3 also ranked higher in color (i.e. retained the bright red color of freshly-cut
meat) than the comparative examples. These factors show that the packaging per the
invention herein helps to extend the refrigerated shelf life, and hence saleability,
of the freshly-cut meat.
[0048] Applicants note that these refrigerated chamber tests for shelf life are less severe
than if the packaged meat had been placed on actual retail display shelves. Retail
shelf storage allows the meat packages to be exposed to slightly higher temperatures,
particularly on their top surfaces. Such higher temperature exposure, even if only
by a few degrees, is detrimental to freshness retention and even more dramatic differences
in odor and color would be expected between the PVC wrapped packages and those of
the invention.
Example 4 and Comparative Example D
[0049] Comparison of shrinkable crosslinked EVA bags (50 microns thick; commercially available
from Cryovac and other converters), Comparative Example D, and highly shrinkable monolayer
bags made from DuPont Surlyn® 1707 ionomer resin (55 micron thick), Example 4.
[0050] Meat cut selected: top round. Testing was done in triplicate samples and run for
a total of six days. Meat samples were maintained in refrigerated shelves for a period
of 6 days. The temperature of the meat in these shelves was controlled at 4-5°C. Cold
chain was well maintained during the whole process, from the cutting of the meat slices
to the storage. Special lighting (low UV) used.
[0051] The two types of packages were compared in terms of color and general appearance
of the meat, as well as odor, after opening the package, by each judge. After 36 hours,
the EVA package showed a significant presence of liquid purge (blood) and a much more
loose (less shrinking force left) appearance than the Surtyn® ionomer package. The
meat color was similar in both sets and considered acceptable by two supermarket meat
managers. All the EVA packages showed a very poor film to meat adhesion, in contrast
with the excellent adhesion observed in the Surlyn® ionomer bags.
[0052] After 3 days, the amount of purge in the EVA packages increased substantially. Both
packages were similar in outside meat color, but the inner color of the meat packaged
in EVA was darker. Excess high shrinking force of the crosslinked EVA, and lack of
adhesion to the meat, tended to accentuate the amount of purge produced. The slight
natural contraction of the meat and the poor adhesion of the EVA to the meat made
the presence of purge more visible.
[0053] Both packages showed slightly darker red color on the fourth day but when the meat
slices were cut, the ones packaged in Surlyn® were bright red in the interior while
those from EVA packages were dark red. Differences in odor were noticed on day 4,
with the meat in the Surlyn® ionomer bags smelling like fresh meat and the others
showing an acid odor.
[0054] Finally on day 6 all the samples packaged in EVA bags were discarded by the meat
managers due to unacceptable color and odor. The Surlyn® set although slightly dark
on the outside, showed still natural red color on the inside of the cut and smelled
like fresh meat. The judges for these tests were three meat managers from a supermarket
and two marketing people from converter.
Examples 5-7 and Comparative Examples E-G
[0055] Test to compare bags made with 50-55 micron thick films of EVA (Elvax® 3120-7.5%
VA, Comp. Ex. E; Elvax® 560-18% VA, Comp. Ex. F); Acid Copolymers (Nucrel® 3990, Ex.
5), metallocene (Affinity® 1881, Comp. Ex. G), and lonomer (Surlyn® 1707, Example
7; Surlyn® 1707/Surlyn® 1855 blends, Example 6) resins.
[0056] Meat cuts selected: Sirloin steaks, ground beef, eye of round and rump.
[0057] Meat packaged in plastic bags made from monolayer blown films (all at blown up ratios
of 7:1). Meat slices were placed inside the bags and vacuum-sealed on an Audionvac
vacuum packaging machine (made by Audion Elektro, Holland). Thermal shrinkage done
in a hot air tunnel at temperatures in the 165-175°C range with residence times inside
the tunnel of 6-8 seconds.
[0058] The meat packages were stored in a refrigerated area at 5+/-1 °C with special low
UV lighting. Package evaluation was done after 5 and 8 days in storage. A veterinarian,
several meat managers from a supermarket and three marketing people from the converter
participated in the evaluation of the packages. Rating was done on color, odor, texture
and general appearance of the meat. The ranking criteria was selected along the following
guidelines:
| COLOR: |
1 ― As good as when packaged. |
| |
2 ― Slight discoloration |
| |
3 ― Larger color change but still acceptable for sales |
| |
4 ― Unacceptable for sale (dark faded red) |
| |
5 ― Significant color change (dark greenish red) |
| ODOR: |
1 ― Good as fresh, just packaged meat |
| |
2 ― Very slight smell but still good |
| |
3 ― Slight acid smell |
| |
4 ― Stronger acid smell |
| |
5 ― Very strong, noticeable smell |
Results:
Day 5:
[0059] All packages were evaluated on color. All Surlyn® packages presented the best color
characteristics. The packages of the rump cut appeared to be the most sensitive and
color degradation for all sets of bags was more pronounced. The two EVA sets and the
metallocene resin set were judged questionable for sales. The sirloin packages in
Surlyn® had an almost original color without any liquid purge visible in the packages.
[0060] Packages containing ground beef were also opened and judged on meat consistency,
color and odor. The meat in the two DuPont Surlyn® sets was considered equivalent
to fresh ground meat. The other packages showed significant darkening of the meat
inside the package.
[0061] Only the Surlyn® packages maintained good meat adhesion and high shrinking force
during this period, despite the contraction of the meat.
Day 8:
[0062]
A) Sirloin
| Sample - Resin |
Odor - Ranking |
Color - Ranking |
| E |
3 |
4 |
| F |
3.5 |
3.5 |
| 5 |
4 |
4.5 |
| G |
5 |
5 |
| 6 |
2 |
2 |
| 7 |
1 |
2 |
B) Ground Beef
| Sample-Resin |
Odor - Ranking |
Color - Ranking |
| E |
4.5 |
4 |
| F |
5 |
3 |
| 5 |
3 |
2.5 |
| G |
3 |
5 |
| 6 |
2 |
2 |
| 7 |
2 |
2 |
C) Eye of round
| Sample - Resin |
Odor - Ranking |
Color - Ranking |
| E |
3 |
3.5 |
| F |
3 |
3 |
| 5 |
2 |
3.5 |
| G |
4 |
5 |
| 6 |
1 |
2 |
| 7 |
1 |
1 |
D) Rump
| Sample - Resin |
Odor - Ranking |
Color - Ranking |
| E |
5 |
5 |
| F |
5 |
3.5 |
| 5 |
2.5 |
3 |
| G |
4.5 |
5 |
| 6 |
2 |
3 |
| 7 |
1 |
3 |
The Oxygen Transmission Rates (23°C, 50% relative humidity) for these 50 micron films
were measured as:
7.5% EVA, 6500 cc/m2/day
18% EVA, 8200 cc/m2/day
Metallocene polyethylene (0.902 g/cc density), 6500 cc/m2/day
Acid copolymer resin (7% AA), 2500 cc/m2/day
Surlyn® 1707, 2800-3000 cc/m2/day
(no available data for the Surlyn® blend).
Examples 8-10 and Comparative Examples H-I
[0063] Oxygen transmission rates (OTR) were measured for various ionomer films. A film of
19% ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) was also tested as Comparative Example H. PVC film
obtained from a commercial supermarket, used to wrap meats for retail sale, was also
tested as Comparative Example I. The conditions were 23 degrees Celsius and 50% relative
humidity. The films were 50-55 microns thick, except the PVC film which wasl2 microns.
Ranges are reported for each and the results are as follows:
TABLE II
| Example/FILM |
OTR (cc/m2-day-atm) |
| 8. Surlyn® 1707 ionomer film (BUR=3) |
2400-2600 |
| 9. Surlyn® 1707 ionomer film bag (BU R=7) |
3500-6000 |
| 10. Example 8 after shrinking |
2800-5500 |
| H. 19% EVA blown film |
8100-8500 |
| 1. Commercial PVC meat wrap |
21000-24000 |
Examples 11-12 and Comparative Examples J-K
[0064] Sensory characteristics (odor, smell) and microbial counts were compared for ground
beef and sliced top round each wrapped in standard, commercial PVC wrap and vacuum,
shrink-wrapped film made from Du Pont Surlyn® ionomer resin.
[0065] A total of 56 meat samples were assayed over 7 days. This included 14 ground beef
samples wrapped in PVC film, 14 ground beef samples wrapped in Surlyn® ionomer film,
14 top round samples wrapped in PVC film, and 14 top round samples wrapped in Surlyn®
ionomer film. The packaged meat was stored under standard refrigeration conditions
(approximately 2°C) at a local supermarket. Daily, two duplicate packages of each
food and wrap were retrieved from the supermarket and transported back to the lab
under refrigerated conditions for immediate testing.
[0066] Organoleptic characteristics were noted. Approximately 10 grams(-/+ 2g) samples were
aseptically removed then diluted 1:10(w/w) in buffered peptone water, stomached for
two minutes. The mixtures were serially diluted in peptone water and plated onto BHI
[Brain Heart Infusion] agar(total mesophile) and VRBA [Violet Red Bile Agar] petrifilm
(E.coli and coliforms). BHI plates were incubated for 24 hours at 35°C. VRBA plates
were incubated for 24 hours at 42°C. Plate counts were calculated per gram of meat.
On day 4 and day 7, a second replicate of the BHI dilutions (psychrophilic counts)
were plated, then incubated for 8 days at 4°C.
[0067] Ground beef packaged in both PVC and Surtyn® ionomer film yielded similar mesophilic
microbial profiles over the course of seven days. Top round results were similar through
the first five days; day six and seven results were variable.
| |
|
Ground Beef Results mesophilic |
psychrophilic |
| Package type |
Day |
Total cfu/g |
coliform cfu/g |
Ecoli cfu/g |
Total cfu/g |
| PVC Comp. Ex. J |
1 |
1.30E+05 |
45 |
45 |
|
| |
2 |
1.90E+05 |
35 |
35 |
|
| |
3 |
4.00 E+05 |
45 |
45 |
|
| |
4 |
5.60E+05 |
45 |
45 |
1.30E+05 |
| |
5 |
8.90E+05 |
45 |
55 |
|
| |
6 |
2.60E+06 |
25 |
25 |
|
| |
7 |
1.40E+06 |
25 |
25 |
1.30E+06 |
| Surlyn® Ex. 11 |
1 |
1.10E+05 |
20 |
20 |
|
| |
2 |
2.00 E+05 |
45 |
45 |
|
| |
3 |
5.10 E+05 |
35 |
35 |
|
| |
4 |
4.10E+05 |
25 |
25 |
3.50E+04 |
| |
5 |
8.30 E+05 |
30 |
30 |
|
| |
6 |
1.10 E+06 |
35 |
35 |
|
| |
7 |
1.10E+06 |
25 |
30 |
3.00E+04 |
| PVC Comp. Ex. K |
1 |
2.30E+04 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
2 |
6.70E+04 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
3 |
4.90E+04 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
4 |
4.00 E+04 |
0 |
0 |
2.40E+04 |
| |
5 |
9.30E+04 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
6 |
1.40 E+04 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
7 |
1.10E+05 |
0 |
0 |
1.30E+05 |
| Surlyn® Ex. 12 |
1 |
1.80 E+04 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
2 |
4.30 E+04 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
3 |
6.20 E+03 |
5 |
5 |
|
| |
4 |
3.00E+04 |
5 |
5 |
<1e3 |
| |
5 |
2.40 E+04 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
6 |
1.10E+05 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
7 |
1.70E+04 |
0 |
0 |
<1e3 |
[0068] A key difference can be seen in the psychrophilic counts. They were at least an order
of magnitude lower for meats packaged in Surlyn® ionomer film v. PVC. Standard refrigeration
conditions favor the growth of these microorganisms over the others tested, and thus
the psychrophilic counts more closely reflect the difference in the two packaging
methods. Also, it is the psychrophilics, specifically the pseudomonas, that are related
to the development of a foul odor, which helps explain the odor differences noticed
in these examples and the previous examples.
Example 13 and Comparative Examples L-N
[0069] Sensory characteristics (odor, smell) were compared for 1-inch (2.54 cm) thick inside
round beef steaks (NAMP #168; Semimembranosus muscle) packaged in 1) a Surlyn® bag
produced in Argentina (Example 13), 2) a foam tray with PVC overwrap produced in Argentina
(Example L), 3) a foam tray with PVC overwrap produced in the United States (Example
M), and 4) a PVC wrap made in Argentina with no foam tray (Example N). A total of
three replications of the experiment were performed.
[0070] For steaks packaged in the Surlyn® bags, steaks were placed inside the bags and sealed
using a vacuum packager to achieve approximately 87% vacuum. Following vacuum packaging,
Surlyn® bags were passed one time through a hot air tunnel to shrink the film around
the product (Shanklin Model T-6XL Shrink Tunnel operating at a temperature setting
of 250°F (121.1°C) and a conveyor speed of 25%). For steaks packaged in PVC overwrap
(both Argentine and U.S.), steaks were placed on 2S trays with Dri Loc® 50 pads and
overwrapped with PVC. For steaks packaged in an Argentine PVC wrap with no tray, steaks
were placed on a single layer of PVC (no Dri Loc® pad used) and wrapped in a similar
manner as those with trays.
[0071] The packaged steaks were held under simulated retail display at 2-3°C for a total
of 8 display days (Day 0 through Day 7). Samples were placed in a retail refrigerated
open-top display case (8-ft (2.44-m) length, Unit Model DMF8, Tyler Refrigeration
Corporation, Niles, MI), which automatically defrosted fourtimes per day at 6 hour
intervals. Lighting parameters used during display included 1614 lux (150 ± 5 foot
candles; Model 201, General Electric, Cleveland, OH) light intensity (Philips, 40W
Deluxe Warm White). The actual display case temperatures were monitored continuously
using temperature loggers.
[0072] On each day of display (Day 0 through Day 7), the presence and degree of off-odor
characteristics was evaluated by a three member experienced panel using the following
scale: 1 = no off odor, 2 = slight off odor, 3 = small off odor, 4 = moderate off
odor, 5 = extreme off odor.
[0073] As shown in Figure 1, steaks packaged in the Surtyn® film demonstrated significantly
lower (better) off-odor scores than did steaks packaged in PVC films, Comparative
Examples L-N (p≤0.05). For the Surtyn®-packaged steaks, off-odor scores at Day 7 were
statistically equivalent to those observed at Day 1 of display. However, for all of
the comparative examples, by Day 3 to 5 of display, off-odor scores were significantly
higher (worse) than those observed at Day 1. These lower off-odor scores indicate
that the Surlyn®-packaged steaks had a more desirable odor than did the PVC-packaged
steaks. Steaks packaged in the manner set forth in Comparative Examples L-N demonstrated
plastic, styrofoam, and other odors associated with packaging material, thereby decreasing
the beefy odor.
Examples 14 and 15 and Comparative Example O
[0074] Pseudomonas sp is an important agent of deterioration in fresh red meat because the bacteria is
responsible for undesirable odors and flavors associated with spoilage. Consequently,
inhibiting the growth of
Pseudomonas sp should reduce the develpoment of a foul odor and extend the shelf life for such meats.
Sensory characteristics (odor, smell) and microbial counts were compared for beef
steaks (250-300 grams cut from fresh inside round primal) packaged and stored in a
cooling cabinet set at 4°C under fluorescent lighting (intensity 500 Lux) for a total
of 10 storage days (Day 0 through Day 9) The steaks were packaged in one of three
packaging treatments 1) Surtyn® bags (film thickness 55 microns) heat sealed and then
shrunk in a hot air tunnel for 20 sec at 150°C, fan setting #4 (Example 14) or in
a hot waterbath for 1 sec at 80 °C (Example 15), and PVC overwrap with a thickness
of 12-14 microns (Example O).
[0075] On days 0, 2, 4, 7 and 9 of storage, steaks were analyzed in duplicate at regular
time intervals for pseudomonas populations. A three member panel evaluated changes
in odor daily. Each sample was cut into 4 x 5 cm
2 pieces from the surface of the steak. This 20 cm
2 surface sample was diluted 1:10 with physiological saline and handled in a stomacher
for 1 minute. The microbial profile (TABLE III) showed that the growth of
Pseudomonas sp is significantly inhibited in the Surlyn® bags compared to the steaks packaged in
PVC over-wrap. The three member panel reported that steaks packaged in Surlyn® film
demonstrated more favorable fresh meat odor retention after two days in storage.
TABLE III
| Pseudomonas sp (cfu/cm2)* |
| Sampling Time Day |
PVC overwrap |
Surlyn® bag hot water |
Surlyn® bag hot air |
| 0 |
1.1x104 |
8.8x103 |
1.1x104 |
| 2 |
1.3x105 |
8.2x104 |
5.1x104 |
| 4 |
1.7x107 |
1.3x105 |
6.1x105 |
| 7 |
1.1x108 |
2.0x106 |
8.5x105 |
| 9 |
n.d.** |
8.8x105 |
5.5x105 |
| *pH = 5.4, determined on Pseudomonas agar base with CFC supplement (PAB. Oxoid CM559
and SR103, 2 days at 25°C) |
| ***not determined" because the meat was unfit for sale |
Example 16
[0076] Coextruded films with Surlyn® 1707 (MI 0.9) as the "food contact layer" (20% thickness),
Elvax® 3135X (MI 0.35; 12% VA, EVA resin) in the middle (60% thickness), and Affinity®
(metallocene ethylene copolymer produced by DOW, (MI1.0) as the outside layer (20%
thickness) were tested for gloss and mechanical properties. The total film thickness
of the coextruded films was 55 microns.
[0077] Samples of fresh meat (bottom round) placed in bags made with this coextruded structure
heat sealed and hot air shrunk (150°C, 12 sec) were stored at 4°C under proper lighting
and compared with cuts from the same meat packaged in PVC overwrap with foam trays
and absorption pads. Results showed lower purge production, longer color retention,
and same fresh meat odor retention differences reported with monolayer Surlyn® 1707
bags.
[0078] Several combinations of multi-layer films were tested these included the following:
"food contact layer"/middle layer/outside layer
Suriyn®/Nucrel®/Metallocene
Surlyn®/EVA/Metallocene
Surlyn®/Nucrel®/SBS
Surlyn®/Nucrel®/PP
Surlyn®/EVA/EVA
Surlyn®/EVA/Nucrel®
Surlyn®/Nucrel®/LDPE
Surlyn®/Metallocene/Metallocene
Suriyn®/Metallocene/EVA.
Resin blends, i.e., LDPE +Metallocene and LDPE+EVA were also used for a particular
layer. The structures worked favorably if the OTR was maintained in the range of 1200
to 6000 cc/m
2-day-atm for an overall film thickness of 75 to 150 microns. These structures were
designed for packaging of fresh meat and poultry, both with and without bones. They
can be made via blown film or cast film extrusion manufacturing. The blown film can
employ a blow-up ratio (BUR) in the range of 1 to 7, resulting in both shrinkable
and non-shrinkable films.
[0079] It was determined that the layer thickness distribution required the Surlyn® layer
to be 20-50% of the total thickness with the other two layers divided to provide a
good balance of desired properties, i.e., mechanical, optical, and OTR.
1. Verfahren zum Verpacken von frischem Nahrungsmittel unter Erhöhen der Kühlhaltbarkeit
von derartigem Nahrungsmittel, umfassend:
a. Einschließen des Nahrungsmittels in einer Folienstruktur mit einer oder mehreren
Schichten, wobei eine Schicht eine Nahrungsmittelkontaktschicht ist, die umfaßt ein
Polymer, ausgewählt aus der Gruppe, bestehend aus Ionomeren, Säurecopolymeren und
Mischungen oder Copolymeren, umfassend Ionomere und/oder Säurecopolymere,
b. Vakuumverschließen der Folienstruktur auf ihrer äußeren Umgrenzung unter Erzielen
eines versiegelten Beutels, der das Nahrungsmittel umhüllt,
c. Anwenden von minimaler Hitze für eine minimale Zeit, notwendig, den versiegelten
Beutel zu schrumpfen und/oder eine sekundäre Versiegelung zu bewirken, wie es der
Fall sein kann, so daß die Nahrungsmitteloberfläche in innigen Kontakt mit der Nahrungsmittelkontaktschicht
gebracht wird und eine Spülung enthalten ist, und
d. Beibehalten einer Kühlkette über Stufen a. bis c. und danach, mit Ausnahme der
minimalen Zeit, die in Stufe c. zum Erhitzen benötigt wird;
wobei die Folienstruktur durch ein Extrusionsblasverfahren unter Verwenden eines Aufblasverhältnisses
(BUR) in dem Bereich von etwa 3 bis etwa 7 hergestellt wurde.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der versiegelte Beutel in einem Sauerstoffundurchlässigen
"Mutterbeutel" eingeschlossen wird.
3. Verfahren nach einem von Ansprüchen 1-2, wobei die Nahrungsmittelkontaktschicht ein
Ionomer umfaßt.
4. Verfahren nach einem von Ansprüchen 1-3, wobei das Nahrungsmittel frisches rotes Fleisch
oder Geflügel ist.
5. Verfahren nach einem von Ansprüchen 1-4, wobei die Folienstruktur eine biaxial-gedehnte,
hitzeschrumpfbare Folie umfaßt.
6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 5, wobei die Folienstruktur einen Schrumpfwert von 25% bis
70% in sowohl den Maschinen- wie transversalen Richtungen hat.
7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, wobei das Ionomer ein Terionomer oder eine Mischung von
einem Terionomeren mit Dipolymerionomer ist.
8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, wobei die Folienstruktur Monoschicht ist und hergestellt
wurde durch ein Extrusionsblasverfahren unter Verwenden eines Aufblasverhältnisses
(BUR) in dem Bereich von 3 bis 7, die Folienstruktur umfaßt eine biaxial-gedehnte,
hitzeschrumpfbare Folie mit einem Schrumpfwert von mindestens 30% in sowohl den Maschinen-
wie transversalen Richtungen, hat eine Sauerstoffdurchlässigkeitsrate, die im Bereich
von 2000 bis 6000 cc/m2 -Tag-Atm für eine 40 - 55 Mikrometerfolie, getestet bei 23°C und 50% relative Feuchtigkeit
pro ASTM D-3985, liegt, und das Nahrungsmittel ist frisches rotes Fleisch.
9. Verpackung für frisches rotes Fleisch oder Geflügel unter Erhöhen der Kühlhaltbarkeit
von derartigem Nahrungsmittel, umfassend:
(a) frisches rotes Fleisch oder Geflügel,
(b) einen Vakuum versiegelten Folienbeutel, umhüllend das rohe Fleisch oder Geflügel,
wobei der Beutel eine oder mehrere Schichten hat, wobei eine Schicht eine Nahrungsmittelkontaktschicht
ist, die umfaßt eine Folie, umfassend ein Polymer, ausgewählt aus der Gruppe, bestehend
aus Ionomeren, Säurecopolymeren, Mischungen oder Copolymeren, umfassend Ionomere und/oder
Säurecopolymere, und die Nahrungsmittelkontaktschicht ist in innigem Kontakt mit dem
frischen roten Fleisch oder Geflügel,
wobei der Folienbeutel durch ein Extrusionsblasverfahren unter Verwenden eines Aufblasverhältnisses
(BUR) in dem Bereich von 3 bis 7 hergestellt wurde.
10. Verpackung nach Anspruch 9, wobei der Folienbeutel eine biaxial-gedehnte, hitzeschrumpfbare
Folie umfaßt.
11. Verpackung nach einem von Ansprüchen 9-10, wobei die Nahrungsmittelkontaktschicht
ein Ionomer umfaßt.
12. Verpackung nach einem von Ansprüchen 9-11, wobei der Folienbeutel eine Monoschichtfolie
ist.
13. Verpackung nach Anspruch 9, wobei der Folienbeutel Monoschicht ist und hergestellt
wurde durch ein Extrusionsblasverfahren unter Verwenden eines Aufblasverhältnisses
(BUR) in dem Bereich von 3 bis 7, der Folienbeutel umfaßt eine biaxial-gedehnte, hitzeschrumpfbare
Folie mit einem Schrumpfwert von mindestens 30% in sowohl den Maschinen- wie transversalen
Richtungen, hat eine Sauerstoffdurchlässigkeitsrate, die im Bereich von 2000 bis 5000
cc/m2-Tag-Atm für eine 50 Mikrometerfolie, getestet bei 23°C und 50% relative Feuchtigkeit,
liegt, und das Nahrungsmittelprodukt ist frisches rotes Fleisch.
14. Verfahren zum Erhöhen der Haltbarkeit von frischem Nahrungsmittel, umfassend die Stufen
von:
a. Einschließen des Nahrungsmittels in einer Folienstruktur mit einer oder mehreren
Schichten, wobei eine Schicht eine Nahrungsmittelkontaktschicht ist, ferner wobei
die Nahrungsmittelkontaktschicht im wesentlichen besteht aus einem Polymeren, ausgewählt
aus der Gruppe, bestehend aus Ionomeren, Säurecopolymeren und Mischungen oder Copolymeren,
umfassend Ionomere und/oder Säurecopolymere,
b. Vakuumversiegeln der Folienstruktur auf ihrer äußeren Umgrenzung unter Erzielen
eines versiegelten Beutels, der das Nahrungsmittel umhüllt,
c. Anwenden von minimaler Hitze für eine minimale Zeit, notwendig, den versiegelten
Beutel zu schrumpfen und/oder eine sekundäre Versiegelung zu bewirken, wie es der
Fall sein kann, so daß die Nahrungsmitteloberfläche in innigen Kontakt mit der Nahrungsmittelkontaktschicht
gebracht wird und eine Spülung enthalten ist, und
d. Beibehalten einer Kühlkette über Stufen a. bis c. und danach, mit Ausnahme der
minimalen Zeit, die in Stufe c. zum Erhitzen benötigt wird,
wobei die Folienstruktur hergestellt wurde durch ein Extrusionsblasverfahren unter
Verwenden eines Aufblasverhältnisses (BUR) in dem Bereich von 3 bis 7 und eine Sauerstoffdurchlässigkeitsrate
(OTR), entweder vor oder nach Stufe c, hat, die im Bereich von 1500 bis 9000 cc/m
2-Tag-Atm für eine 40-55 Mikrometerfolie, getestet bei 23°C und 50% relative Feuchtigkeit
pro ASTM D-3985, liegt.
1. Procédé d'emballage d'aliment frais pour augmenter la durée de stockage au réfrigérateur
de cet aliment comprenant les étapes suivantes:
a) incorporation de l'aliment dans une structure de film ayant une ou plusieurs couches,
dans laquelle une couche est une couche en contact avec l'aliment qui comprend un
polymère choisi parmi le groupe constitué d'ionomères, de copolymères acides, et de
mélanges ou de copolymères comprenant des ionomères et/ou des copolymères acides;
b) scellage sous vide de la structure de film sur son périmètre pour obtenir un sachet
scellé recouvrant l'aliment;
c) application de la chaleur minimale pendant un temps minimal nécessaire pour rétracter
le sachet scellé et/ou effectuer un second scellage, selon le cas, de sorte que la
surface de l'aliment soit placée en contact intime avec la couche en contact avec
l'aliment et ne contienne aucune purge; et
d) maintien d'une chaîne froide tout au long des étapes a. à c. et après cela, maintien
pendant le temps minimum requis à la chaleur de l'étape c,
dans lequel ladite structure de film est obtenue par un procédé d'extrusion-soufflage
utilisant un taux de soufflage (BUR) dans l'intervalle d'environ 3 à environ 7
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1 dans lequel le sachet scellé est recouvert d'un «sac
mère» imperméable à l'oxygène.
3. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 ou 2 dans lequel la couche en contact avec
l'aliment comprend un ionomère.
4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1-3 dans lequel l'aliment est une
viande rouge ou une volaille fraîche.
5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1-4 dans lequel la structure de
film comprend un film étiré de manière biaxiale rétractable à la chaleur.
6. Procédé selon la revendication 5 dans lequel la structure de film a un taux de rétraction
de 25% à 70% dans chacun des sens machine et transversal.
7. Procédé selon la revendication 3 dans lequel l'ionomère est un ter-ionomère ou un
mélange d'un ter-ionomère avec un ionomère dipolymère.
8. Procédé selon la revendication 3, dans lequel la structure de film est une monocouche
et est obtenue par un procédé d'extrusion-soufflage utilisant un taux de soufflage
(BUR) dans l'intervalle de 3 à 7, la structure de film comprend un film étiré de manière
biaxiale rétractable à la chaleur ayant un taux de rétraction d'au moins 30% dans
chacun des sens machine et transversal, présente une vitesse de transmission de l'oxygène
variant de 2000 à 6000 cm3/m2-jour-atm pour un film de 40-55 microns testé à 23°C et 50% d'humidité relative selon
la norme ASTM D-3985 et l'aliment est de la viande rouge fraîche.
9. Emballage pour de la viande rouge ou de la volaille fraîche pour augmenter la durée
de stockage au réfrigérateur d'un tel aliment comprenant:
a) de la viande rouge ou de la volaille fraîche;
b) un sachet d'un film scellé sous vide recouvrant la viande ou la volaille crue,
ledit sachet ayant une ou plusieurs couches, dans lequel une couche est une couche
en contact avec l'aliment qui comprend un film comprenant un polymère choisi parmi
le groupe constitué d'ionomères, de copolymères acides, de mélanges ou de copolymères
comprenant des ionomères et/ou des copolymères acides, et la couche en contact avec
l'aliment est en contact intime avec la viande rouge ou la volaille fraîche
dans lequel ledit sachet est obtenu par un procédé d'extrusion-soufflage utilisant
un taux de soufflage (BUR) dans l'intervalle d'environ 3 à environ 7
10. Emballage selon l'une quelconque des revendications 9 dans lequel le sachet de film
comprend un film étiré de manière biaxiale rétractable à la chaleur.
11. Emballage selon l'une quelconque des revendications 9-10 dans lequel la couche en
contact avec l'aliment comprend un ionomère.
12. Emballage selon l'une quelconque des revendications 9-11 dans lequel le sachet de
film est un film monocouche.
13. Emballage selon la revendication 9, dans lequel le sachet de film est une monocouche
et est obtenu par un procédé d'extrusion-soufflage utilisant un taux de soufflage
(BUR) dans l'intervalle de 3 à 7, le sachet de film comprend un film étiré de manière
biaxiale rétractable à la chaleur ayant un taux de rétraction d'au moins 30% dans
chacun des sens machine et tranversal, a une vitesse de transmission de l'oxygène
variant de 2000 à 5000 cm3/m2-jour-atm pour un film de 50 microns testé à 23°C et 50% d'humidité relative et le
produit alimentaire est une viande rouge fraîche.
14. Procédé pour augmenter la durée de stockage d'aliment frais comprenant les étapes
de:
a) incorporation de l'aliment dans une structure de film ayant une ou plusieurs couches,
dans laquelle une couche est une couche en contact avec l'aliment, dans laquelle en
outre la couche en contact avec l'aliment consiste essentiellement en un polymère
choisi parmi le groupe constitué d'ionomères, de copolymères acides, et de mélanges
ou de copolymères comprenant des ionomères et/ou des copolymères acides;
b) scellage sous vide de la structure de film sur son périmètre pour obtenir un sachet
scellé recouvrant l'aliment;
c) application de la chaleur minimale pendant un temps minimal nécessaire pour rétracter
le sachet scellé et/ou effectuer un second scellage, selon le cas, de sorte que la
surface de l'aliment soit placée en contact intime avec la couche en contact avec
l'aliment et ne contienne aucune purge; et
d) maintien d'une chaîne froide tout au long des étapes a. à c. et après cela, maintien
pendant le temps minimum requis à la chaleur de l'étape c;
dans lequel la structure de film est obtenu par un procédé d'extrusion-soufflage utilisant
un taux de soufflage (BUR) dans l'intervalle de 3 à 7 et présente une vitesse de transmission
de l'oxygène (OTR), soit avant soit après l'étape c, variant de 1500 à 9000 cm
3/m
2-jour-atm pour un film de 40-55 microns testé à 23°C et 50% d'humidité relative selon
la norme ASTM D-3985.