[0001] This invention relates to an ink jet recording element, more particularly to a porous
ink jet recording element and a printing method.
[0002] In a typical ink jet recording or printing system, ink droplets are ejected from
a nozzle at high speed towards a recording element or medium to produce an image on
the medium. The ink droplets, or recording liquid, generally comprise a recording
agent, such as a dye or pigment, and a large amount of solvent. The solvent, or carrier
liquid, typically is made up of water, an organic material such as a monohydric alcohol,
a polyhydric alcohol or mixtures thereof.
[0003] An ink jet recording element typically comprises a support having on at least one
surface thereof an ink-receiving or image-forming layer. The ink-receiving layer may
be a porous layer which imbibes the ink via capillary action or a polymer layer which
swells to absorb the ink.
[0004] Ink jet prints, prepared by printing onto ink jet recording elements, are subject
to environmental degradation. They are especially vulnerable to water smearing and
light fade. For example, since ink jet dyes are water-soluble, they can migrate from
their location in the image layer when water comes in contact with the receiver after
imaging. Highly swellable hydrophilic layers can take an undesirably long time to
dry, slowing printing speed, and will dissolve when left in contact with water, destroying
printed images. Porous layers speed the absorption of the ink vehicle, but often suffer
from insufficient gloss and severe light fade. Porous layers are also difficult to
coat without cracking.
[0005] U.S. Patent 4,849,457 discloses a porous membrane for use as a recording medium for
ink jet printing comprising a mixture of two water-insoluble polymers and 9% of polyvinylpyrrolidone.
However, there is a problem with this element in that the density obtained with an
element having less than 25% by weight of a water-absorbent polymer is too low, as
will be shown hereafter. Further, this membrane is made by coating the two materials
from a solvent, and then passing the coated element through a nonsolvent bath. The
porous membrane employed in this invention is formed solely upon drying of the coated
solution without the need for a nonsolvent bath.
[0006] JP95040647A discloses a porous membrane for use as a recording medium for ink jet
printing comprising a mixture of a hydrophobic binder containing cationic conductive
macromolecules. However, there is a problem with this element in that the density
and dye lightfastness obtained with an element having less than 25% by weight of a
water-absorbent polymer is too low, as will be shown hereafter.
[0007] U.S. Patent 5,374,475 discloses a porous layer for ink jet printing comprising a
thermoplastic polymer free of filler. However, there is a problem with this element
in that the density obtained with an element without a water-absorbent polymer is
too low, as will be shown hereafter.
[0008] U.S. Patent 5,759,639 discloses a printing medium for ink jet printing which uses
a polymeric dope solution. A porous layer is formed using a phase inversion technique.
Although a second polymer is used in the process, most of it is washed out in a coagulation
step. There is a problem with this element in that the density obtained with an element
having less than 25% by weight of a water-absorbent polymer is too low, as will be
shown hereafter.
[0009] EP 940,427 discloses a method for making a microporous film for an ink jet recording
element in which a hydrophobic polymer and a second hydrophilic polymer or copolymer
of N-vinylpyrrolidone is dissolved in a certain solvent system, partially dried, and
then washed to extract at least 50% by weight of the second polymer. There is a problem
with the elements formed by this process in that a separate washing step is employed
which adds to the complexity of the coating process.
[0010] It is an object of this invention to provide an ink jet recording element which will
provide improved ink uptake speed. Another objective of the invention is to provide
an ink jet recording element having a receiving layer that when printed upon has an
excellent image quality. Another object is to provide an ink jet printing method.
[0011] These and other objects are provided by the present invention comprising an ink jet
recording element comprising a support having thereon an image-receptive layer capable
of accepting an ink jet image, said layer comprising an open-pore membrane of a mixture
of a water-insoluble polymer and a water-absorbent polymer, the mixture containing
at least 25% by weight of the water-absorbent polymer, the image-receiving layer being
made by dissolving the mixture of polymers in a solvent mixture, the solvent mixture
comprising at least one solvent which is a good solvent for the water-insoluble polymer
and at least one poor solvent for the water-insoluble polymer, the poor solvent having
a higher boiling point than the good solvent, coating the dissolved mixture on the
support, and then drying to remove approximately all of the solvents to obtain the
open-pore membrane.
[0012] Using the invention, a recording element is obtained which will provide improved
ink uptake speed and when printed upon has an excellent image quality.
[0013] Another object of the invention relates to an ink jet printing method comprising
the steps of:
A) providing an ink jet printer that is responsive to digital data signals;
B) loading the printer with an ink jet recording element as described above;
C) loading the printer with an ink jet ink composition; and
D) printing on the ink jet recording element using the ink jet ink in response to
the digital data signals.
[0014] In order for the image-receptive layer to be sufficiently porous, the water-insoluble
polymer must be coated from a solvent mixture combination such that an open-pore membrane
structure will be formed when the solution is coated and dried, in accordance with
the known technique of dry phase inversion. The formation of an open-pore membrane
is accomplished by using a mixture of a good and poor solvent for the water-insoluble
polymer. As noted above, the poor solvent has a boiling point that is higher than
that of the good solvent. When the solution is coated or cast onto a support and dried,
the good solvent evaporates faster than the poor solvent, forming the membrane structure
of the layer when the polymer phase separates from the solvent mixture. The open-pore
structure results when the good solvent and poor solvent are removed by drying.
[0015] The water-insoluble polymer that can be used in the invention may be, for example,
a cellulose ester such as cellulose diacetate, cellulose triacetate, cellulose acetate
propionate or cellulose acetate butyrate, cellulose nitrate, polyacrylates such as
poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(phenyl methacrylate) and copolymers with acrylic or
methacrylic acid, or sulfonates, polyesters, polyurethanes, polysulfones, urea resins,
melamine resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, polyacetals, polybutyrals, epoxies and
epoxy acrylates, phenoxy resins, polycarbonates, vinyl acetate polymers and copolymers,
vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymers, vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate-vinyl-alcohol
copolymers, vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate-maleic acid polymers, vinyl chloride-vinylidene
chloride copolymers, vinyl chloride-acrylonitrile copolymers, acrylic ester-acrylonitrile
copolymers, acrylic ester-vinylidene chloride copolymers, methacrylic ester-styrene
copolymers, butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymers, acrylonitrile-butadiene-acrylic or
methacrylic acid copolymers, or styrene-butadiene copolymers. Cellulose ester derivatives,
such as cellulose diacetates and triacetates, cellulose acetate propionate, cellulose
acetate butyrate, cellulose nitrate, and mixtures thereof are preferred.
[0016] The water-absorbent polymer that is used in the invention may be, for example, polyvinylpyrrolidone
and vinylpyrrolidone-containing copolymers, polyethyloxazoline and oxazoline-containing
copolymers, imidazole-containing polymers, polyacrylamides and acrylamide-containing
copolymers, poly(vinyl alcohol) and vinyl-alcohol-containing copolymers, poly(vinyl
methyl ether), poly(vinyl ethyl ether), poly(ethylene oxide), hydroxyethylcellulose,
hydroxpropylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, methylcellulose, and mixtures
thereof.
[0017] The choice of a good and poor solvent for the water-insoluble polymer will be effectively
determined by the specific choice of polymer. The good solvent that can be used in
the invention includes alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, n-propyl alcohol, isopropyl
alcohol, isobutyl alcohol, Dowanol® solvents, glycols, ketones such as acetone, 2-butanone,
3-pentanone, cyclopentanone, and cyclohexanone, ethyl acetate, methylacetoacetate,
diethylether, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide,
pyridine, chlorinated solvents such as methylene chloride, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride,
and dichloroethane, hexane, heptane, cyclopentane, cyclohexane, toluene, xylenes,
nitrobenzene, and mixtures thereof.
[0018] The poor solvent that can be used in the invention may be, for example, alcohols
such as ethanol, n-propyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, isobutyl alcohol, 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol,
and Dowanol® solvents, glycols, ketones such as 2-butanone, 3-pentanone, cyclopentanone,
and cyclohexanone, ethyl acetate, methylacetoacetate, diethylether, tetrahydrofuran,
acetonitrile, dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, pyridine, chlorinated solvents
such as carbon tetrachloride, and dichloroethane, hexane, heptane, cyclopentane, cyclohexane,
toluene, xylenes, nitrobenzene, water, and mixtures thereof.
[0019] Since the image recording element may come in contact with other image recording
articles or the drive or transport mechanisms of image recording devices, additives
such as filler particles, surfactants, lubricants, crosslinking agents, matte particles
and the like may be added to the element to the extent that they do not degrade the
properties of interest.
[0020] Filler particles may be used in the open-pore membrane such as silicon oxide, fumed
silica, silicon oxide dispersions such as those available from Nissan Chemical Industries
and DuPont Corp., aluminum oxide, fumed alumina, calcium carbonate, barium sulfate,
barium sulfate mixtures with zinc sulfide, inorganic powders such as γ-aluminum oxide,
chromium oxide, iron oxide, tin oxide, doped tin oxide, alumino-silicate, titanium
dioxide, silicon carbide, titanium carbide, and diamond in fine powder, as described
in U.S. Patent 5,432,050.
[0021] A dispersing agent, or wetting agent can be present to facilitate the dispersion
of the filler particles. This helps to minimize the agglomeration of the particles.
Useful dispersing agents include, but are not limited to, fatty acid amines and commercially
available wetting agents such as Solsperse® sold by Zeneca, Inc. (ICI). Preferred
filler particles are silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, calcium carbonate, and barium
sulfate. Preferably, these filler particles have a median diameter less than 1.0 µm.
The filler particles can be present in the amount from 0 to 80 percent of the total
solids in the dried open-pore membrane layer, most preferably in the amount from 0
to 40 percent.
[0022] The open-pore membrane layer may include lubricating agents. Lubricants and waxes
useful either in the open-pore membrane layer or on the side of the element that is
opposite the open-pore membrane layer include, but are not limited to, polyethylenes,
silicone waxes, natural waxes such as carnauba, polytetrafluoroethylene, fluorinated
ethylene propylene, silicone oils such as polydimethylsiloxane, fluorinated silicones,
functionalized silicones, stearates, polyvinylstearate, fatty acid salts, and perfluoroethers.
Aqueous or non-aqueous dispersions of submicron size wax particles such as those offered
commercially as dispersions of polyolefins, polypropylene, polyethylene, high density
polyethylene, microcrystalline wax, paraffin, natural waxes such as carnauba wax,
and synthetic waxes from such companies as, but not limited to, Chemical Corporation
of America (Chemcor), Inc., Michelman Inc., Shamrock Technologies Inc., and Daniel
Products Company, are useful.
[0023] The open-pore membrane layer may include coating aids and surfactants such as nonionic
fluorinated alkyl esters such as FC-430®, FC-431®, FC-10®, FC-171® sold by Minnesota
Mining and Manufacturing Co., Zonyl® fluorochemicals such as Zonyl-FSN®, Zonyl-FTS®,
Zonyl-TBS®, Zonyl-BA® sold by DuPont Corp.; other fluorinated polymer or copolymers
such as Modiper F600® sold by NOF Corporation, polysiloxanes such as Dow Coming DC
1248®, DC200®, DC510®, DC 190® and BYK 320®, BYK 322®, sold by BYK Chemie and SF 1079®,
SF1023®, SF 1054®, and SF 1080® sold by General Electric, and the Silwet® polymers
sold by Union Carbide; polyoxyethylene-lauryl ether surfactants; sorbitan laurate,
palmitate and stearates such as Span® surfactants sold by Aldrich; poly(oxyethylene-co-oxypropylene)
surfactants such as the Pluronic® family sold by BASF; and other polyoxyethylene-containing
surfactants such as the Triton X® family sold by Union Carbide, ionic surfactants,
such as the Alkanol® series sold by DuPont Corp., and the Dowfax® family sold by Dow
Chemical.
[0024] The open-pore membrane layer may include crosslinking agents, such as organic isocyanates
such as tetramethylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, diisocyanato dimethylcyclohexane,
dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, dimethylbenzene diisocyanate,
methylcyclohexylene diisocyanate, lysine diisocyanate, tolylene diisocyanate, diphenylmethane
diisocyanate; aziridines such as taught in U. S. Patent 4,225,665; ethyleneimines
such as Xama-7® sold by EIT Industries; blocked isocyanates such as CA BI-12 sold
by Cytec Industries; melamines such as methoxymethylmelamine as taught in U. S. Patent
5,198,499; alkoxysilane coupling agents including those with epoxy, amine, hydroxyl,
isocyanate, or vinyl functionality; Cymel® crosslinking agents such as Cymel 300®,
Cymel 303®, Cymel 1170®, Cymel 1171® sold by Cytec Industries; and bis-epoxides such
as the Epon® family sold by Shell. Other crosslinking agents include compounds such
as aryloylureas, aldehydes, dialdehydes and blocked dialdehydes, chlorotriazines,
carbamoyl pyridiniums, pyridinium ethers, formamidinium ethers, and vinyl sulfones.
Such crosslinking agents can be low molecular weight compounds or polymers, as discussed
in U. S. Patent 4,161,407 and references cited.
[0025] The useful thickness range of the open-pore membrane layer used in the invention
is from 1 µm to 100 µm, preferably from 2 µm to 50 µm.
[0026] In the present invention, the base support for the open-pore membrane layer of the
recording element can be opaque resin coated paper, plain paper, coated paper, synthetic
paper, or a transparent material, such as cellulose derivatives, e.g., a cellulose
ester, cellulose triacetate, cellulose diacetate, cellulose acetate propionate, cellulose
acetate butyrate; polyesters, such as polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene naphthalate,
poly-1,4-cyclohexanedimethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, and copolymers
thereof; polyimides; polyamides; polycarbonates; polystyrene; polyolefins, such as
polyethylene or polypropylene; polysulfones; polyarylates; polyether imides; and mixtures
thereof. The papers listed above include a broad range of papers, from high end papers,
such as photographic paper to low end papers, such as newsprint.
[0027] The support used in the invention may employ an undercoat or an adhesive layer such
as, for example, a vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate-itaconic acid terpolymer or
a vinylidene chloride-acrylonitrile-acrylic acid terpolymer. Other chemical adhesives,
such as polymers, copolymers, reactive polymers or copolymers, that exhibit good bonding
between the open-pore membrane layer and the support can be used. Other methods to
improve the adhesion of the layer to the support include surface treatment such as
by corona-discharge, plasma-treatment in a variety of atmospheres, UV treatment, etc,
which is performed prior to applying the layer to the support.
[0028] The recording element of the invention can contain one or more conducting layers
such as an antistatic layer to prevent undesirable static discharges during manufacture
and printing of the image. This may be added to either side of the element. Antistatic
layers conventionally used for color films have been found to be satisfactory, such
as those in U.S. Patent 5,147,768. Preferred antistatic agents include metal oxides,
e.g., tin oxide, antimony doped tin oxide and vanadium pentoxide. These antistatic
agents are preferably dispersed in a film-forming binder.
[0029] The layers described above may be coated by conventional coating means onto a support
material commonly used in this art. Coating methods may include, but are not limited
to, wound wire rod coating, knife coating, slot coating, slide hopper coating, gravure
coating, spin coating, dip coating, skim-pan-air-knife coating, multilayer slide bead,
blade coating, curtain coating, multilayer curtain coating and the like. Some of these
methods allow for simultaneous coatings of more than one layer, which is preferred
from a manufacturing economic perspective if more than one layer or type of layer
needs to be applied. The support may be stationary, or may be moving so that the coated
layer is immediately drawn into drying chambers.
[0030] Ink jet inks used to image the recording elements of the present invention are well
known in the art. The ink compositions used in ink jet printing typically are liquid
compositions comprising a solvent or carrier liquid, dyes or pigments, humectants,
organic solvents, detergents, thickeners, preservatives, and the like. The solvent
or carrier liquid can be solely water or can be water mixed with other water-miscible
solvents such as polyhydric alcohols. Inks in which organic materials such as polyhydric
alcohols are the predominant carrier or solvent liquid may also be used. Particularly
useful are mixed solvents of water and polyhydric alcohols. The dyes used in such
compositions are typically watersoluble direct or acid type dyes. Such liquid compositions
have been described extensively in the prior art including, for example, U.S. Patents
4,381,946; 4,239,543 and 4,781,758.
[0031] The following examples further illustrate the invention.
Example 1 (Shows need for water-absorbent polymer)
Preparation of Element 1
[0032] A homogeneous solution was prepared from 8 wt. % cellulose diacetate, CDA, (CA398-30,
Eastman Chemical Company), 4 wt. % polyvinylpyrrolidone, PVP, (K25 from Aldrich Chemical
Co.), 52.8 wt. % acetone (good solvent), and 35.2 wt. % 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
(poor solvent). The solution was metered to a slot-die coating apparatus and coated
onto a plain paper support moving at a speed of 15 m/min. The coated support immediately
entered the drying section of the coating machine to remove substantially all solvent
components and form an image receiving element comprised of a microporous membrane.
The thickness of the dry microporous membrane layer was measured to be 9 µm.
Preparation of Element 2
[0033] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 1 except that the CDA was
6 wt. %, the PVP was PVP-360 (Sigma-Aldrich Company) at 2 wt. %, the acetone was 55.2
wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol was at 36.8 wt. %.
Preparation of Element 3
[0034] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 1 except that the CDA was
6 wt. %, polyethyloxazoline, PEOx (Polysciences Inc.) was employed instead of PVP
at 2 wt. %, the acetone was 59.8 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol was at 32.2
wt. %.
Preparation of Control Element C-1 (no water-absorbent polymer)
[0035] A homogeneous solution was prepared from 9 wt. % cellulose diacetate, CDA, (CA398-30,
Eastman Chemical Company), 52.3 wt. % acetone (good solvent), and 38.7 wt. % 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
(poor solvent). This element was coated and dried as in Element 1.
Preparation of Control Element C-2 (no water-absorbent polymer)
[0036] A homogeneous solution was prepared from 9 wt. % CDA (CA398-30), 3 wt. % poly(methyl
methacrylate), PMMA, (Scientific Polymer Products, Inc), 50.6 wt. % acetone, and 37.4
wt. % 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol. The solution was coated onto a plain paper support
using a calibrated coating knife, and dried to remove substantially all solvent components
to form a microporous membrane.
Preparation of Control Element C-3 (no water-absorbent polymer)
[0037] This element was prepared and coated the same as Control Element C-2 except that
poly(vinyl acetate), PVAc, (Scientific Polymer Products, Inc.) was used instead of
PMMA
Printing
[0038] A cyan ink jet ink was prepared using a standard formulation with Direct Blue 199
as the dye. Using an Epson 200® ink jet printer, a series of square patches of varying
dye density were printed onto the above elements. The density of each patch was read
using an X-Rite 820® densitometer. The red channel density of the cyan patch at D-max
(the highest density setting) is reported in the following Table 1:
Table 1
Element |
Polymers (Wt. Ratios) |
D-max |
1 |
CDA / PVP (67/33) |
1.5 |
2 |
CDA / PVP (75/25) |
1.3 |
3 |
CDA / PEOx (75/25) |
1.3 |
Control C-1 |
CDA (100) |
1.0 |
Control C-2 |
CDA / PMMA (75/25) |
0.6 |
Control C-3 |
CDA / PVAc (75/25) |
0.5 |
[0039] The above results show that the elements of the invention all had higher densities
as compared to the control elements.
Example 2 (Shows need for at least 25 wt. % water-absorbent polymer)
Preparation of Element 4
[0040] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the acetone was 50.6
wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol was at 37.4 wt. %. The solution was coated
the same as Control C-2.
Preparation of Element 5
[0041] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 4 except that the CDA was
5 wt. %, the PVP was at 3 wt. %, the acetone was 52.9 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
was at 39.1 wt. %.
Preparation of Element 6
[0042] This element was prepared the same as Element 4 except that the CDA was 6 wt. %,
the PVP was at 2 wt. %, the acetone was 59.8 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
was at 32.2 wt. %. The element was coated the same as Element 1.
Preparation of Element 7
[0043] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 6 except that Polymer M-1
(see below) was added at 4 wt. %, the acetone was 52.8 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
was at 35.2 wt. %.
Preparation of Element 8
[0044] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 4 except that the CDA was
6 wt. %, polymer M-2 (see below) was employed instead of PVP at 2 wt. %, the acetone
was 55.2 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol was at 36.8 wt. %.
Preparation of Element 9
[0045] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 8 except that the polymer
M-2 (see below) was at 4 wt. %, the acetone was 54.0 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
was at 36.0 wt. %.
Preparation of Element 10
[0046] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 1 except that the CDA was
6 wt. %, polymer M-1 (see below) was employed instead of PVP at 3 wt. %, the acetone
was 52.3 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol was at 38.7 wt. %.
Preparation of Control Element C-4 (water-absorbent polymer less than 25 wt. %)
[0047] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 4 except that the CDA was
9 wt. %, the PVP was at 2 wt. %, the acetone was 51.2 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
was at 37.8 wt. %.
Preparation of Control Element C-5 (water-absorbent polymer less than 25 wt. %)
[0048] This element was prepared and coated the same as Control Element C-4 except that
the PVP was at 1 wt. %, the acetone was 51.8 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
was at 38.2 wt. %.
Preparation of Control Element C-6 (water-absorbent polymer less than 25 wt. %)
[0049] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 10 except that the polymer
M-1 (see below) was at 1.2 wt. %, the acetone was 53.4 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
was at 39.4 wt. %.
Printing
[0050] The above elements of Example 2 were printed the same as in Example 1, except that
Elements 8-10 and Control Element 6 were printed on a Lexmark Z-51 Printer and an
additional ink was used: a magenta ink containing Dye 6 from U.S. Patent 6,001,161.
The following results were obtained:
Table 2
Element |
Polymers (Wt. Ratios) |
Total wt. % water-absorbent polymer |
Cyan D-max |
Magenta D-max |
4 |
CDA/PVP (67/33) |
33.3 |
1.5 |
|
5 |
CDA/PVP (62.5/37.5) |
37.5 |
1.3 |
|
6 |
CDA/PVP (75/25) |
25.0 |
1.3 |
|
3 |
CDA/PEOx (75/25) |
25.0 |
1.3 |
|
7 |
CDA/PVP/M-1 (50/17/33) |
50.0 |
1.4 |
|
8 |
CDA/M-2 (75/25) |
25 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
9 |
CDA/M-2 (60/40) |
40 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
10 |
CDA/M-1 (67/33) |
33 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
Control C-4 |
CDA/PVP (81.8/18.2) |
18.2 |
0.8 |
|
Control C-5 |
CDA/PVP (90 /10) |
10.0 |
0.8 |
|
Control C-6 |
CDA / M-1 (83/17) |
17 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
[0051] The above results show that the elements of the invention all had a higher D-max
than the control elements with less than 25 wt. % water-absorbent polymer.
Preparation of M-1
[0052] Compound M-1 is a water-absorbent polymer and is a random copolymer of 1-vinylimidazole
and ethyl acrylate and was synthesized as follows. A 3-L three-necked, round-bottomed
flask fitted with a mechanical stirrer, reflux condenser and nitrogen inlet, was charged
with 1200 g of N,N-dimethylformamide, 193.8 g of 1-vinylimidazole, and 206.2 g of
ethyl acrylate. The solution was sparged with dry nitrogen for 30 min, and then 2.0
g of 2,2'-azobis(isobutyronitrile) was added and the flask was immersed in a 60°C
constant temperature bath under a slight positive pressure of nitrogen and stirred
for 24 hr. The polymer was precipitated into diethyl ether, filtered, and dried in
vacuo for several days, resulting in an off-white solid.
Preparation of M-2
[0053] Compound M-2 is a water-absorbent polymer and is a random copolymer of 1-vinylimidazole
and 1-vinylpyrrolidone and was synthesized as follows. A 1-L three-necked, round-bottomed
flask fitted with a mechanical stirrer, reflux condenser and nitrogen inlet adapter,
was charged with 320 mL of pH 7 buffer, 45 mL of isopropyl alcohol, 8.7 g of 1-vinylimidazole,
and 82.5 g of 1-vinylpyrrolidone. This solution was sparged with dry nitrogen for
30 min, and then 0.67 g of 4,4'-azobis(4-cyanovaleric acid) was added. The flask was
immersed in a 60°C constant temperature bath under a slight positive pressure of nitrogen
and stirring begun. A solution of 40 mL of pH 7 buffer, 6 mL of isopropyl alcohol,
8.7 g of 1-vinylimidazole, and 0.67 g of 4,4'-azobis(4-cyanovaleric acid) was prepared
in a similar way and pumped into the reaction flask over 210 min. The polymerization
was allowed to proceed for a total of 7 hours. The polymer was then dialyzed in Membra
Cel® tubing with a 12,000 - 16,000 molecular weight cutoff for 16 hours, and then
freeze-dried, giving an off-white solid.
Example 3 (Shows need for at least 25 wt. % water-absorbent polymer)
Preparation of Element 11
[0054] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the CDA was 6 wt. %,
the PVP was at 2 wt. %, the acetone was 53.0 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol
was at 39.0 wt. %. The element was coated the same as Control Element C-2.
Preparation of Element 12
[0055] This element was prepared the same as Element 3 except that the acetone was 53.0
wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol was at 39.0 wt. %. The element was coated
the same as Control Element C-2.
Printing and dye light stability testing
[0056] The above elements of Example 3 and Element 10 and Control Elements C-1 and C-6 were
printed the same as in Example 1, except that a Lexmark Z51 ink jet printer was used,
with a magenta ink jet ink prepared using a standard formulation with Dye 6 from U.S.
Patent 6,001,161, and a yellow inkjet ink prepared using a standard formulation with
Direct yellow 132 dye. The density of each patch was read using an X-Rite ® 820 densitometer.
[0057] The printed elements were then subjected to 2 weeks exposure to 50 Klux high intensity
daylight. The density of each patch was read after the light exposure test using an
X-Rite ® 820 densitometer. The % dye retention was calculated as the ratio of the
density after the light exposure test to the density before the light exposure test.
The results for magenta D-max and yellow D-max were as follows:
Table 3
Element |
Polymers (Wt. Ratios) |
% dye retention magenta D-max |
% dye retention yellow D-max |
11 |
CDA/PVP (75/25) |
87.8 |
84.1 |
12 |
CDA/PEOx (75/25) |
90.2 |
89.5 |
10 |
CDA/M-1 (67/33) |
91.6 |
88.3 |
Control C-1 |
CDA (100) |
33.6 |
38.7 |
Control C-6 |
CDA/M-1 (83/17) |
91.6 |
53.6 |
[0058] The above results show that the elements of the invention all had greater dye lightfastness
of the printed image for both magenta and yellow dyes than the control elements with
less than 25 wt. % water-absorbent polymer.
Example 4 (Shows varying proportions of good and poor solvent and proportion of water-absorbent
to water-insoluble polymer)
Preparation of Element 13
[0059] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 1 except that the CDA was
6 wt. %, the PVP was at 2 wt. %, the acetone was 55.2 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol,
MPD, was at 36.8 wt. %.
Preparation of Element 14
[0060] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 13 except that acetone was
62.1 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol was at 29.9 wt. %.
Preparation of Element 15
[0061] This element was prepared and coated the same as Element 13 except that the CDA was
7.33 wt. %, the PVP was K30 (Aldrich Chemical Co.) at 3.67 wt. %, the acetone was
62.3 wt. % and the 2-methyl-2,4,-pentanediol was at 26.7 wt. %.
Printing and evaluation
[0062] The above elements of Example 4 were printed the same as in Example 3, except that
a cyan ink jet ink, prepared using a standard formulation with Direct Blue 199 as
the dye, was also used. The red channel density (cyan), green channel density (magenta),
and blue channel density (yellow) patches at D-max (the highest density setting) are
reported in Table 4. The gloss of the top surface of the unprinted image receiving
layer was measured using a BYK Gardner gloss meter at an angle of illumination/reflection
of 60°. The results are related to a highly polished black glass with a refractive
index of 1.567 that has a specular gloss value of 100. The following results were
obtained:
Table 4
Element |
Polymers (Wt. Ratios) |
Acetone / MPD |
60° gloss |
Cyan D-max |
Magenta D-max |
Yellow D-max |
13 |
CDA/PVP (75/25) |
60/40 |
38 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
14 |
CDA/PVP (75/25) |
67.5/32.5 |
47 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
15 |
CDA/PVP (67/33) |
70/30 |
65 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
[0063] The above results show that the surface gloss and printed image density of the elements
of the invention can be controlled by varying the relative proportions of good and
poor solvent for the water-insoluble polymer, as well as the proportion of water-absorbent
to water-insoluble polymer within the confines of the invention.