Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to an iron golf club, and more particularly, it relates
               to an iron golf club capable of improving the carry by rendering its face readily
               deflectable at the hit.
 
            Background Art
[0002] U. S. Patent No. 5,863,261 describes first prior art related to the head of a golf
               club. This literature discloses a head part of a golf club having two face plates
               fixed to each other with a fluid for causing elastic deformation by a doubler structure
               and effectively supplying the energy of the golf club to a ball thereby improving
               the carry.
 
            [0003] As second prior art, U. S. Patent No. 5,605,511 discloses a head part of a golf club
               having an annular groove provided on the rear peripheral wall part of its face to
               enclose the central part.
 
            [0004] A golf club is required to get a carry. In particular, a long carry eases the next
               shot and influences the score. Repulsiveness of the clubface is remarkably concerned
               with the carry. Therefore, it is important to improve the repulsiveness of the clubface.
 
            [0005] According to the head part of the golf club disclosed in the aforementioned first
               prior art, it is conceivable to improve the repulsiveness to some extent. However,
               a great deal of time and labor for connection and a high cost are required for manufacturing
               the structure having two face plates in the first prior art.
 
            [0006] The head part of the golf club according to the second prior art, provided with the
               annular groove thereby reducing audible vibration, is not directed the carry of a
               golf ball. Further, a great deal of time and labor and a high cost are required for
               manufacturing the head part due to the necessity for providing the annular groove.
 
            Disclosure of the Invention
[0007] Accordingly, a principal object of the present invention is to provide an iron golf
               club having a head part capable of improving repulsiveness and increasing the carry
               of a ball by reducing the rigidity of its face without requiring a great deal of time
               and labor and a high cost for manufacturing the same.
 
            [0008] The iron golf club according to the present invention comprises a head part having
               a face, and a restitution coefficient is in the range of at least 0.81 and not more
               than 0.95 when colliding a ball against a sweet spot in the face at a speed of 44
               m/s.
 
            [0009] Thus, the carry of the ball can be increased not only when the ball is hit by the
               sweet spot but also when hit by a portion close to the sweet spot due to the high
               restitution coefficient at the sweet spot of the face. The restitution coefficient
               can be improved by reducing the thickness of the face, for example, without requiring
               a great deal of time and labor or a high cost for manufacturing the iron golf club.
 
            [0010] In the head part of the aforementioned iron golf club, an effective face area is
               preferably at least 2500 mm
2 and not more than 5000 mm
2. Throughout the specification, the term "effective face area" stands for the surface
               area of a portion of a face part substantially deflectable at the hit, such as the
               surface area of a face central portion excluding wall potions around the face part
               in a clubhead having a hollow structure, for example.
 
            [0011] In the head part of the aforementioned iron golf club, an effective deflection length
               is preferably at least 36 mm and not more than 72 mm. The term "effective deflection
               length" stands for the length of a portion of the face part substantially deflectable
               at the hit, passing through the sweet spot in a direction perpendicular to the ground,
               such as the length of a portion between wall portions around the face part, passing
               through the sweet spot in a direction perpendicular to the ground, in a clubhead having
               a hollow structure, for example.
 
            [0012] In the head part of the iron golf club according to the present invention, the thickness
               of the face is preferably at least 1.0 mm and not more than 2.5 mm at the sweet spot.
               Further, the elasticity of the face part is preferably at least 30 GPa and not more
               than 210 GPa.
 
            [0013] The aforementioned subject matters may be properly combined with each other.
 
            Brief Description of the Drawings
[0014] 
               
               Fig. 1 is an exploded perspective view of a head part of an iron golf club according
                  to the present invention;
               Fig. 2 is a sectional view taken along the line 100-100 in Fig. 1, showing a front-part
                  component and a rear-part component assembled with each other; and
               Fig. 3 shows results of a carry test made on inventive and comparative samples.
 
            Best Modes for Carrying Out the Invention
[0015] In an iron golf club according to the present invention, the thickness of a face
               in a head part is reduced, for example, thereby improving a restitution coefficient
               when colliding a prescribed ball against a face part at a prescribed speed. More specifically,
               the restitution coefficient is set in the range of at least 0.81 and not more than
               0.95 when colliding the ball against a sweet spot at a speed of 44 ± 0.5 m/s in a
               test method described later.
 
            [0016] When the thickness of the face is reduced as described above, the face part is rendered
               readily deflectable, i.e., readily elastically deformable to be capable of exhibiting
               a spring effect and improving repulsiveness of the face. More specifically, the thickness
               of the face is set to at least 1.0 mm and not more than 2.5 mm.
 
            [0017] The term "the thickness of the face" stands for the board thickness of the face part
               in a direction perpendicular to the face at the sweet spot. The elasticity of the
               face part is preferably at least 30 GPa and not more than 210 GPa.
 
            [0018] The repulsiveness of the face can be further improved by increasing an effective
               face area, i.e., the area of a deformed region at the center of the face. More specifically,
               the effective face area is at least 2500 mm
2 and not more than 5000 mm
2.
 
            [0019] In the present invention, the term "effective face area" stands for the surface area
               of a portion of the face part substantially deflectable at the hit. In an iron golf
               club having a head part of a hollow structure, for example, the effective face area
               corresponds to the area of a face center portion excluding wall portions around the
               face, such as the area of a portion shown by slant lines in Fig. 1.
 
            [0020] The repulsiveness of the face can be improved by increasing the effective deflection
               length, i.e., the length between a sole part and a top edge part at the center of
               the face. More specifically, the effective deflection length is at least 36 mm and
               not more than 72 mm.
 
            [0021] In the present invention, the term "effective deflection length" stands for the length
               of a portion of the face part substantially deflectable at the hit, passing through
               the sweet spot of the face in a direction perpendicular to the ground. In an iron
               golf club having a head part of a hollow structure, for example, the effective deflection
               length corresponds to the length of a portion between wall portions around the face,
               passing through the sweet spot (center of a face score line) in a direction perpendicular
               to the ground. Referring to Figs. 1 and 2, symbol L denotes the effective deflection
               length.
 
            [0022] In the iron golf club head part having the head part of a hollow structure, the wall
               portions around the face conceivably serve as support portions deforming the face
               at the hit, and hence the region enclosed with the wall portions can be readily elastically
               deformed by increasing the length between the support portions. Consequently, the
               repulsiveness is improved as described above.
 
            [0023] Further, the amount of elastic deformation is reduced if the length between the support
               portions is small on the portion colliding with the ball regardless of the effective
               face area, and hence the length between the support portions must be increased. Thus,
               the repulsiveness of the face can be further improved by increasing the aforementioned
               effective deflection length.
 
            [0024] A method of measuring the restitution coefficient is now described.
 
            [0025] First, the face of the iron golf club head part is stood perpendicularly to the ground
               and the golf ball to be collided therewith, and the golf ball is collided against
               the center of the score line of the clubhead or the sweet spot, for measuring the
               ball speed Vin (Vin = 44 ± 0.5 m/s in this method) before collision and the ball speed
               Vout after collision with a speed meter having an optical sensor.
 
            [0026] The restitution coefficient COR is calculated from the measured speeds Vin and Vout
               and the following numerical formula (1):

 Where M represents the mass of the head part of the iron golf club, and m represents
               the mass of the golf ball. Pinacle Gold LS by Acushinet Company is employed as the
               golf ball. The golf ball, having an average weight of 45.4 ± 0.4 g, is kept in a room
               maintained at a temperature of 23 ± 1°C during the test.
 
            [0027] An embodiment of the present invention is now described with reference to Figs. 1
               to 3. Fig. 1 is an exploded perspective view of a head part 1 of an iron golf club
               according to the present invention. Fig. 2 is a sectional view taken along the line
               100-100 in Fig. 1 showing a front-part component 10 and a rear-part component 11 assembled
               with each other. Referring to Figs. 1 and 2, illustration of a shaft and a grip of
               the iron golf club is omitted.
 
            [0028] As shown in Fig. 1, the head part 1 is formed by integrally assembling the front-part
               component 10 and the rear-part component 11 with each other. The front-part component
               10 has a concave part 13b provided on its center, a connection part 6 (wall portion)
               provided on its peripheral edge, and a hosel 5. The rear-part component 11 has a concave
               part 13a provided on its center and a connection part 6 provided on its peripheral
               edge. The front-part component 10 and the rear-part component 11 are integrated with
               each other by welding the peripheral edges of the connecting parts 6. Welding margins
               are 2 mm, for example.
 
            [0029] Referring to Fig. 1, the area of the bottom surface of the concave part 13b, i.e.,
               the area of the region shown by slant lines, corresponds to the aforementioned effective
               face area. According to this embodiment, the effective face area is 2930 mm
2.
 
            [0030] Further, the length L shown by arrow in Fig. 1 corresponds to the aforementioned
               effective deflection length, which is 36.5 mm in this embodiment.
 
            [0031] As shown in Fig. 2, the head part 1 of the iron golf club according to this embodiment
               is provided in a cavity back structure with a sole part 2 having a larger thickness
               than a top edge part 3, and has a hollow structure with a space 12 defined between
               the front-part component 10 and the rear-part component 11.
 
            [0032] The thickness (face thickness) t of a face part having a face 4 serving as a hitting
               surface is 2.3 mm. This thickness corresponds to that at a sweet spot.
 
            [0033] The front-part component 10 and the rear-part component 11 are formed by forging
               stainless steel SUS 630, for example.
 
            [0034] The material for the face is not restricted to the aforementioned stainless steel
               but may alternatively be prepared from another stainless steel such as austenite-based
               SUS 301, 303, 304, 304N1, 304N2, 305, 309S, 310S, 316, 317, 321, 347 or XM7, martensite-based
               SUS 410, 420, 431 or 440, precipitation-hardened SUS 630, ferrite-based SUS 405, 430
               or 444, soft iron such as S15C, S20C, S25C, S30C or S35C, or special steel such as
               high tension steel, ultrahigh tension steel, ausforming steel, maraging steel or spring
               steel. Further alternatively, the material can be prepared from a titanium alloy such
               as pure titanium I, II, III or IV, an α alloy of 5Al-2.5V, an α-β alloy of 3Al-2.5V,
               6Al-4V, 4.5Al-3V-2Fe-2Mo, a β alloy of 15V-3Cr-3Sn-3Al, 10V-2Fe-3Al, 13V-11Cr-3Al,
               15Mo-5Zr, 15V-6Cr-4Al, 15Mo-5Zr-3Al, 20V-4Al-lSn, 22V-4Al or 3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-3Zr, an
               aluminum alloy such as pure aluminum, 2017, 2024, 7075, 3003, 5052, 5056, 6151, 6053
               or 6061 or a magnesium-based alloy such as AZ63A, AZ81A, AZ91A, AZ91C, WE54 or EZ33A,
               while a doubler formed by any combination of these materials is employable.
 
            [0035] The material for the parts other than the face can be prepared from a material generally
               employed for manufacturing a clubhead such as iron, stainless steel, aluminum, titanium,
               magnesium, tungsten, copper, nickel, zirconium, cobalt, manganese, zinc, silicon,
               tin, chromium, FRP, synthetic resin, ceramic or rubber, which may be singularly employed.
               Alternatively, a combination of at least two of these materials may be employed.
 
            [0036] The face and the remaining parts can be manufactured by precision casting, which
               can be carried out with high dimensional accuracy at a low cost. Alternatively, the
               head body can be manufactured by die casting, pressing or forging. Further alternatively,
               the respective parts can be manufactured by pressing, forging, precision casting,
               metal injection, die casting, cutting or powder metallurgy and connected with each
               other by bonding, press fitting, engaging, pressure connection, screwing, brazing
               or the like for forming the clubhead.
 
            [0037] Characteristics of inventive sample of the aforementioned head part and comparative
               samples A to D of conventional head parts are now described with reference to Table
               1 and Fig. 3.
 
            [0038] Table 1 shows restitution coefficients, sizes and areas of the inventive sample and
               the comparative samples A to D. Referring to Table 1, the comparative sample D, for
               example, is the so-called cavity back iron clubhead, which is made of soft iron S25C.
               
               
               
 Table 1
                  
                     
                        
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                        
                        
                           
                              | No.5 | 
                              Inventive Sample | 
                              Comparative Sample A | 
                              Comparative Sample B | 
                              Comparative Sample C | 
                              Comparative Sample D | 
                           
                        
                        
                           
                              | Face Thickness (mm) | 
                              2.3 | 
                              3.4 | 
                              3.2 | 
                              2.8 | 
                              3 | 
                           
                           
                              | Effective Face Area (mm2) | 
                              2930 | 
                              2080 | 
                              1760 | 
                              2410 | 
                              1820 | 
                           
                           
                              | Effective Deflection Length (mm) | 
                              36.5 | 
                              31.4 | 
                              31.9 | 
                              35.5 | 
                              29.6 | 
                           
                           
                              | Restitution Coefficient | 
                              0.815 | 
                              0.771 | 
                              0.785 | 
                              0.804 | 
                              0.784 | 
                           
                        
                     
                   
                
            [0039] Comparing the inventive sample with the aforementioned comparative sample D in particular,
               the face thickness is reduced by 23 %, the effective face area is increased by 61
               % and the effective deflection length is increased by 23 %. In the inventive sample,
               the restitution coefficient of 0.815 is improved by 4 % as compared with that of 0.784
               of the comparative sample D.
 
            [0040] Also as compared with the remaining comparative samples A to C, the restitution coefficient
               of the inventive sample is extremely high as shown in Table 1.
 
            [0041] Fig. 3 shows the carries of the inventive sample and the comparative sample D. Number
               five irons with a loft of 26 degrees were employed for making a robot test at a head
               speed of 35 m/s. Fig. 3 shows an average value of six shots as to each sample. As
               shown in Fig. 3, the inventive sample exhibits a carry of 146.7 m and a total carry
               of 151.7 m inclusive of roll, while the comparative sample exhibits a carry of 135.2
               m and a total carry of 137.1 m inclusive of roll. Thus, it is understood that the
               carry and the total carry of the inventive sample are improved by 8.5 % and 10.6 %
               respectively as compared with the comparative sample D.
 
            [0042] According to the present invention, as hereinabove described, the repulsiveness of
               the clubface can be improved by reducing the rigidity of the face without requiring
               a great deal of time and labor and a high cost for manufacturing the head part of
               the iron golf club, for increasing the carry of the ball.
 
            Industrial Applicability
[0043] The present invention can be effectively applied to an iron golf club.
 
          
         
            
            1. An iron golf club comprising a head part (1) having a face (4), wherein
                  a restitution coefficient is in the range of at least 0.81 and not more than 0.95
               when colliding a ball against a sweet spot in said face at a speed of 44 m/s.
 
            2. The iron golf club according to claim 1, wherein
                  an effective face area being the surface area of a portion of said face (4) deflectable
               at the hit is at least 2500 mm2 and not more than 5000 mm2.
 
            3. The iron golf club according to claim 1, wherein
               
               
said head part (1) has a hollow structure,
               
               wall portions (6) are provided on the peripheral edge of a face part in said head
                  part (1), and
               
               the surface area of a central portion of said face (4) located between said wall portions
                  (6) is at least 2500 mm2 and not more than 5000 mm2.
  
            4. The iron golf club according to claim 1, wherein
                  an effective deflection length being the length of a portion of said face (4) deflectable
               at the hit, passing through said sweet spot of said face (4) in a direction perpendicular
               to the ground, is at least 36 mm and not more than 72 mm.
 
            5. The iron golf club according to claim 1, wherein
               
               
said head part (1) has a hollow structure,
               
               wall portions (6) are provided on the peripheral edge of a face part in said head
                  part (1), and
               
               an effective deflection length being the length between said wall portions (6), passing
                  through said sweet spot of said face (4) in a direction perpendicular to the ground,
                  is at least 36 mm and not more than 72 mm.
  
            6. The iron golf club according to claim 1, wherein
                  the thickness of a face part is at least 1.0 mm and not more than 2.5 mm at said
               sweet spot of said face (4).
 
            7. The iron golf club according to claim 1, wherein
                  the elasticity of a face part in said head part (1) is at least 30 GPa and not
               more than 210 GPa.