FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to an improved process for making granular detergent
compositions which have superior solubility, especially in cold temperature laundering
solutions (i.e., less than about 30°C), excellent flow properties (even after storage),
and aesthetics/appearance. More particularly, the present process relates to the manufacture
of detergent compositions via the use of a fluidized bed granulator having recycle
of improperly sized particles.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Recently, there has been considerable interest within the detergent industry for
laundry detergents which have the convenience, aesthetics and solubility of liquid
laundry detergent products, but retain the cleaning performance and cost of granular
detergent products. The problems, however, associated with past granular detergent
compositions with regard to aesthetics, solubility, flowability after standard storage
conditions and user convenience are formidable. Such problems have been exacerbated
by the advent of "compact" or low dosage granular detergent products which typically
do not dissolve in washing solutions as well as their liquid laundry detergent counterparts.
These low dosage detergents are currently in high demand as they conserve resources
and can be sold in small packages which are more convenient for consumers prior to
use, but less convenient upon dispensing into the washing machine as compared to liquid
laundry detergent which can be simply poured directly from the bottle as opposed to
"scooped" from the box and then dispensed into the washing solution.
[0003] As mentioned, such low dosage or "compact" detergent products unfortunately experience
dissolution problems, especially in cold temperature laundering solutions (i.e., less
than about 30°C). More specifically, poor dissolution results in the formation of
"clumps" which appear as solid white masses remaining in the washing machine or on
the laundered clothes after conventional washing cycles. These "clumps" are especially
prevalent under cold temperature washing conditions and/or when the order of addition
to the washing machine is laundry detergent first, clothes second and water last (commonly
known as the "Reverse Order Of Addition" or "ROOA"). Such undesirable "clumps" are
also formed if the consumer loads the washing machine in the order of clothes, detergent
and then water. Similarly, this clumping phenomenon can contribute to the incomplete
dispensing of detergent in washing machines equipped with dispenser drawers or in
other dispensing devices, such as a granulette. In this case, the undesired result
is undissolved detergent residue in the dispensing device.
[0004] It has been found that the at least a portion of the dissolution profile of a granular
detergent composition is impacted by the process used to manufacture that detergent.
For instance, the dissolution profile of a detergent composition may be impacted by
the uniformity of the particles in the composition with respect to both density and
size of the particles. This uniformity in turn is dictated in large part by the process
by which the detergent is manufactured. However, to date manufacturing processes have
been largely unsatisfactory in delivering compositions of the desired uniformity.
[0005] Accordingly, the need remains for a process for the manufacture of detergent compositions
which can provide compositions of the desired uniformity and as such exhibits improved
solubility, is more aesthetically pleasing to consumers, has improved flowability
and exhibits improved cleaning performance.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] This need has been met by the present invention wherein a process for the manufacture
of a detergent composition in a fluidized bed granulator with selected recycle of
the improperly sized particles is provided. The present invention meets the aforementioned
needs by controlling the size of the particles within the process to a greater extent
than current detergent manufacturing processes. Via the present invention the amount
of undersized particles or fines present in a detergent composition are reduced via
the use of fluidized bed granulation and the amount of oversized particles are also
reduced via the screeing and re-introduction of these oversized particles to the process.
The result is a detergent composition with improved solubility or dissolution in laundering
solutions, especially in solutions kept at cold temperatures (i.e., less than about
30°C), is aesthetically pleasing to consumers and has improved flowability.
[0007] In accordance with a first aspect of present invention, a process for making a granular
detergent composition as defined in claim 1 is provided.
The process may comprise various alternative scenarios such as re-introduction to
any combination of the fluid bed or when present, to a premixer or finishing step.
The oversized particles may be optionally milled or ground before re-introduction
to the process. Undersized particles may be removed from the fluidized bed and re-introduced
to the process such as to the premixer or fluidized bed or may be re-circulated within
the fluid bed via the use of an internally recycling fluidized bed.
[0008] Accordingly, it is an advantage of the invention to provide a process for making
granular detergent compositions which exhibit improved solubility, are more aesthetically
pleasing to consumers, have improved flowability and exhibit improved cleaning performance.
It is a further advantage of the present invention to provide a process for making
a granular detergent composition wherein selected recycle of improperly sized particles
is employed to provide a more uniform detergent composition.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0009] As used herein, the word "particles" means the entire size range of a detergent final
product or component or the entire size range of discrete particles, agglomerates,
or granules in a final detergent product or component admixture. It specifically does
not refer to a size fraction (i.e., representing less than 100% of the entire size
range) of any of these types of particles unless the size fraction represents 100%
of a discrete particle in an admixture of particles. For each type of particle component
in an admixture, the entire size range of discrete particles of that type have the
same or substantially similar composition regardless of whether the particles are
in contact with other particles. For agglomerated components, the agglomerates themselves
are considered as discrete particles and each discrete particle may be comprised of
a composite of smaller primary particles and binder compositions.
[0010] As used herein, the phrase "geometric mean particle diameter" means the geometric
mass median diameter of a set of discrete particles as measured by any standard mass-based
particle size measurement technique, preferably by dry sieving. As used herein, the
phrase "geometric standard deviation" or "span" of a particle size distribution means
the geometric breadth of the best-fitted log-normal function to the above-mentioned
particle size data which can be accomplished by the ratio of the diameter of the 84.13
percentile divided by the diameter of the 50
th percentile of the cumulative distribution (D
84.13/D
50); See Gotoh et al,
Powder Technology Handbook, pp. 6-11, Marcel Dekker 1997.
[0011] As used herein, the phrase "builder" means any organic or inorganic material having
"builder" performance in the detergency context, and specifically, organic or inorganic
material capable of removing water hardness from washing solutions and/or having dispersion
or peptization properties. As used herein, the term "bulk density" refers to the uncompressed,
untapped powder bulk density, as measured by pouring an excess of powder sample through
a funnel into a smooth metal vessel (e.g., a 500 ml volume cylinder), scraping off
the excess from the heap above the rim of the vessel, measuring the remaining mass
of powder and dividing the mass by the volume of the vessel.
[0012] As used herein, "composition" and "granular detergent composition" are intended to
include both final products and additives/components of a detergent composition. That
is, the compositions produced by the processes claimed herein may be complete laundry
detergent compositions or they may be additives that are used along with other detergent
ingredients for laundering fabrics and the like.
[0013] The present invention is directed toward the use of selected recycle streams of improperly
sized particles to advantageously produce a detergent that is more uniform in appearance
and presents improved dissolution and aesthetic features as well. Via the use of a
fluidized bed to control undersized particles and screening and reintroduction of
oversized particles superior detergent compositions are produced.
[0014] In general, the process of the present invention comprises the addition of a granular
feed stream into a fluidized bed granulator to achieve at least partial granulation
of the feed stream. Of course, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that
multiple feed streams are possible within the scope of the present invention. The
feed stream of the present invention may comprise granules of conventional detergent
adjunct ingredients, wet detergent agglomerates, dry detergent agglomerates or spray-dried
detergent granules. Detergent adjunct ingredients includes but is not limited to,
carbonates, phosphates, sulfates, zeolites or the like. Of course, other conventionally
known ingredients may be included as well. Spray-dried detergent granules include
those particles which are manufactured via a conventional spray-drying technique wherein
a slurry of detergent materials is prepared and sprayed downward into a upwardly flowing
stream of gas to dry the particles. A dry free flowing material is produced from the
process. Wet detergent agglomerates includes those particles that are manufactured
via a granulation type process wherein detergent adjunct ingredients such as described
above are admixed with a liquid binder material such as a surfactant or precursor
thereof in a mixer or series of mixer to form granules of detergent materials. These
particles are known as "wet agglomerates" until dried and as dry agglomerates upon
exiting a drying and optionally a conditioning stage. The conditioning stage may include
sizing, grinding and cooling stages in any combination, Granulation processes are
well know in the detergent art. Some non-limiting examples include the process as
described in U.S Patent Nos. 5,489,392. 5,516,448 to Capeci et al.
[0015] Accordingly, the present invention entails the introduction of both raw material
ingredients to form a detergent agglomerate or the introduction of previously formed
detergent granules for continued processing of the granules. In a preferred embodiment
of the present invention, the granular feed stream comprises at least two of the differing
types of granules such as spray-dried granules and wet or dry detergent agglomerates.
In one highly preferred embodiment, the feed stream is comprised of spray-dried detergent
granules, dry detergent agglomerates and detergent adjunct ingredients.
[0016] Optionally, the granular feed stream may be processed to remove particles having
geometric mean particle diameter of from 500 microns to 1500 microns with a geometric
standard deviation of from 1 to 2. These "in-spec" particles can be fed directly to
the resulting granular detergent composition. The processing of the feed streams can
be accomplished by, for example "screening", to remove the particles that have the
desired geometric mean particle diameter. By feeding these "in-spec" particles directly
to the resulting granular detergent composition, the granular detergent making process
is by-passed. This reduces the load on the granular detergent making equipment and
increases the yield of particles within the desired size range.
[0017] The fluidized bed granulator comprises a fluid bed dryer into which a detergent binder
is added to agglomerate particles within the fluid bed. As stated earlier, the fluid
bed of the present invention contributes to the overall uniformity of the detergent
of the present invention via the granulation of the undersized particles. Undersized
or "fine particles" are defined as particles that have a geometric mean particle diameter
that is less than 1.65 standard deviations below the chosen geometric mean particle
diameter of the granular detergent composition at a given span or geometric standard
deviation. Oversized or large particles may also exist wherein "large particles" are
defined as particles that have a geometric mean particle diameter that is greater
than 1.65 standard deviations above the chosen geometric mean particle diameter of
the granular detergent composition at a given span or geometric standard deviation.
[0018] While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the undersized particles
of the present invention are significantly reduced via the use of fluid bed granulation.
Undersized particles are fluidized and circulated within the bed where they come into
contact with the liquid binder material sprayed into the fluid bed. As the undersized
particles circulate within the bed at a higher rate than other particles, these undersized
particles come into contact with the binder material at a higher rate. Accordingly,
the undersized particles are agglomerated or bound to other particles thereby reducing
the total number of undersized particles. Via the use of fluidized bed granulation,
the amount of undersized particles are reduced by as much as 10% more preferably 25%
than conventional detergent processing techniques.
[0019] Undersized particles remaining after the fluid bed granulation step of the present
invention may then be separated from the granular detergent during the process and
re-introduced to the process. The undersized particles may be extracted from the process
via elutriation from the exhaust gases of the fluidized bed or via other conventional
processing means such as an air lift or screen. These undersized particles may then
be added to any unit operation in the process. These unit operation may include a
premixer or series of premixers, fluid bed granulator, fluid bed coater, fluid bed
or bulk heat exchanger for cooling, grinder or milling equipment for oversize and
screens used for sieving. In this manner, the process may be controlled for optimum
reduction of undersized particles by selectively re-introducing the particles to various
processing steps where they may be agglomerated to build size of the particles. Alternatively,
undersized particles are controlled via the use of an internally recirculating fluidized
bed wherein undersized particles are captured before exiting the fluidized bed and
remain within the bed until agglomerated to acceptable sizes.
[0020] Preferably, the fluid bed granulator of the present invention has multiple internal
"stages" or "zones". A stage or zone is any discrete area within the fluid bed, and
these terms are used interchangeably herein. The process conditions within a stage
may be different or similar to the other stages in the fluid bed. It is understood
that two adjacent fluid beds are equivalent to a single bed having multiple stages.
The granular feed stream is at least partially agglomerated within the fluid bed via
the addition of a liquid binder material to the fluid bed. The granular feed stream
or streams can be sized and split if desired and added at different stages, depending
on, for example, the particle size and moisture level of the feed stream. Feeding
different streams to different stages can minimize the load on the fluid bed, and
optimize the particle size and shape as defined herein. Liquids are typically added
to a bed through nozzles above or within the product flowing through the bed, and
the nozzles can spray upward, across or downward depending on their position within
the fluid bed. Manufacturers of such fluidized beds include Niro, Bepex, Spray Systems
and Glatt.
[0021] The liquid binder material is added for purposes of enhancing granulation by providing
a "binding" or "sticking" agent for the detergent components such as undersized particles.
The binder is preferably selected from the group consisting of water, anionic surfactants
and their precursors, nonionic surfactants, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone,
polyacrylates, citric acid and mixtures thereof. Other suitable binder materials including
those listed herein are described in Beerse et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,108.646 (Procter
& Gamble Co.).
[0022] Typical conditions within a fluidized bed granulator of the present invention include
(i) from 1 to 20 minutes of mean residence time. (ii) from 100 to 600 mm of depth
of unfluidized bed. (iii) a droplet spray size of less than 2 times the particles
size, preferably not more than 100, more preferably not more 50 micron, (iv) from
150 to 1600 mm of spray height from the fluid bed plate, (v) from 0.1 to 4.0 m/s of
fluidizing velocity, preferably 1.0 to 3.0 m/s and (vi) from 12 to 200 °C of bed temperature,
more preferably 15-100 °C. Once again, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize
that the conditions in the fluid bed may vary depending on a number of factors.
[0023] The fluid bed granulator of the present invention is preferably operated such that
it has a flux number of from 2.5 to 4.5. Flux number (FN) is a ratio of the excess
velocity (U
e) of the fluidization gas and the particle density (p
p) relative to the mass flux (q
liq) of the liquid sprayed into the bed at a normalized distance (D
o) of the spraying device. The flux number provides an estimation of the operating
parameters of a fluidized bed to control granulation within the bed. The flux number
may be expressed either as the mass flux as determined by the following formula:

or as the volume flux as determined by the formula:

where q
vlig is the volume of spray into the fluid bed. Calculation of the flux number and a description
of its usefulness is fully described in WO 98/58046.
[0024] In addition, the fluid bed granulator of the present invention is operated such that
it has a Stokes number of less than one (1), more preferably from 0.1 to 0.5. The
Stokes number is a measure of particle coalescence for describing the degree of mixing
or agglomerating occurring to particles in a piece of equipment such as the fluid
bed. The Stokes number is measured by the formula:

wherein p is the apparent apparent particle density, v is the excess velocity, d
is the mean particle diameter and u is the viscosity of the binder. The Stokes number
and a description of its usefulness is described in detail in WO 99/03964.
[0025] Optionally, the feed stream of present invention can be processed in at least one
pre-mixer before the addition of the feed stream to the fluidized bed granulator to
form detergent premix. The pre-mixer may be one or a series of low, moderate or high
speed mixers as is conventionally known in the art. The particular mixer used in the
present process should preferably include pulverizing or grinding and granulation
tools although such tools are not required. To that end, it has been found that the
preferred process of the present invention employs as a pre-mixer a Lodige KM™ (Ploughshare)
moderate speed mixer, Lodige CB™ high speed mixer, or mixers made by Fukae, Drais,
Schugi or similar brand mixer. The Lodige KM™ (Ploughshare) moderate speed mixer,
which is a preferred mixer for use in the present invention, comprises a horizontal,
hollow static cylinder having a centrally mounted rotating shaft around which several
plough-shaped blades are attached. Preferably, the shaft rotates at a speed of from
15 rpm to 140 rpm, more preferably from 80 rpm to 120 rpm. The grinding or pulverizing
is accomplished by cutters, generally smaller in size than the rotating shaft, which
preferably operate at 3600 rpm. Other mixers similar in nature which arc suitable
for use in the process include the Lodige Ploughshare™ mixer and the Drais® K-T 160
mixer. Generally, in the process of the present invention, the shear will be no greater
than the shear produced by a Lodige KM mixer with a tip speed of the ploughs below
30 m/s or even below 10 m/s or even lower.
[0026] The detergent agglomerates from the fluidized bed granulator may be further processed,
if necessary to dry or cool the agglomerated particles.
[0027] Preferably, the mean residence time of the various detergent ingredients in the low,
moderate or high speed mixer is preferably in range from 0.1 seconds to 30 minutes,
most preferably the residence time is 0.1 seconds to 5 minutes. In this way, the density
of the resulting detergent agglomerates is at the desired level.
[0028] The processes of this invention may comprise the step of spraying an additional binder
material as hereinbefore described in the pre-mixer or series of pre-mixers in order
to enhance granulation of the various materials in the feed stream.
[0029] In an optional embodiment of the present invention, the process may additionally
include a finishing step including but not limited to, admix and/or spray-on of additional
ingredients such as enzymes, bleach perfumes, etc or a packaging step.
[0030] Upon exiting from the fluid bed granulator (or any suitable stage therein), the detergent
agglomerates may be sized to separate oversized particles from detergent agglomerates
in the desired range. The oversized particles may be sized according to conventionally
known technology such as via screening. The oversized particles are then re-introduced
into the process at appropriate locations in order to achieve the more uniform detergent
composition as disclosed herein. Via the control of oversized particles in conjunction
with the undersized particles as described hereinbefore, a detergent process for producing
a superior performing detergent composition is controlled. As mentioned previously,
the control of these oversized particles leads to better overall properties of the
composition such as particle density and span as described herein which contribute
to the overall superiority of the detergent composition.
[0031] Preferably, but by no means required, the oversized particles may be optionally milled
or ground before re-introduction to the process. The milling or grinding may be preformed
in conventional grinding equipment as is well known in the art of detergent processing.
The oversized particles may be re-introduced to the process to any desired stage suitable
for control of the process such as the fluid bed, the pre-mixer or series of pre-mixers
or the finishing step, when present. The oversized particle stream may be split and
particles re-introduced into a combination of locations disclosed above. In preferred
embodiments of the present invention, the oversized particles are passed through a
grinding step where the ground product is once again sized and acceptable particles
passed through to a coating step as described herein or to the resulting final detergent
composition while the improperly sized particles are re-introduced to process as described
above. In preferred embodiments, the oversized particles are re-introduced into the
pre-mixer or series of pre-mixers.
[0032] In an optional embodiment, the feed stream may be sized as well before entering the
fluid bed granulator. When an optional pre-mixer or series of pre-mixers is present,
the sizing may occur before or after any or all of the pre-mixers. Thus, oversized
particles may be removed at any stage of the process. These oversized particles may
then be combined for re-introduction into the process, particularly after a preferred
grinding or milling step. Of course, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize
that by re-introduction into a mixer of the present invention for both undersized
and oversized particles, it is intended to include re-introduction to the feed streams
entering the mixer or granulator in question as well re-introduction directly into
the mixer or granulator.
[0033] The particles of this inventio may be further processed in an optional step by adding
a coating agent to improve the particle color, increase the particle "whiteness",
or improve the particle flowability after the particles exit the mixer or the dryer
to obtain the granular detergent composition produced by the present invention. Coating
agents herein may include dry inorganic materials such as zeolites, carbonates, sulfates
etc. Alternatively, the coating process may include the spray of a liquid coating
agents such as anionic surfactant, slurries or solutions of inorganic or organic salts,
and various other materials. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a wide
variety of methods may be used to dry as well as cool the exiting detergent particles
without departing from the scope of the invention. Since the mixer can be operated
at relatively low temperatures, the need for cooling apparatus is not required by
the present process, which thereby further reduces manufacturing costs of the final
product.
[0034] Another optional processing step includes continuously adding a coating agent such
as zeolites and fumed silica to the mixer to facilitate free flowability of the resulting
detergent particles and to prevent over granulation.
[0035] The granular detergent composition achieves the desired benefits of solubility, improved
aesthetics and flowability via the process of the present invention and the control
or selection of the geometric mean particle diameter of certain levels of particles
in the composition. By "improved aesthetics", it is meant that the consumer prefers
a granular detergent product which has a more uniform appearance of particles as opposed
to past granular detergent products which contained particles of varying size and
composition. To that end, at least 50%, more preferably at least 75%, even more preferably
at least 90%, and most preferably at least 95%, by weight of the total particles in
the detergent product, have the selected mean particle size diameter. In this way,
a substantial portion of the granular detergent product will have the uniform size
so as to provide the aesthetic appearance desired by consumers.
[0036] Preferably, the geometric mean particle diameter of the particles is from 500 microns
to 1500 microns, more preferably from 600 microns to 1200 microns, and most preferably
from 600 microns to 1000 microns. The particle size distribution is defined by a relative
tight geometric standard deviation or "span" so as not to have too many particles
outside of the target size. Accordingly, the geometric standard deviation is preferably
from 1 to 2, more preferably is from 1.0 to 1.7, even more preferably is from 1.0
to 1.4, and most preferably is from 1.0 to 1.2. The bulk density of the particles
is preferably in the range of from 400 g/L to 850g/L, more preferably from 550 g/l
to 800 g/l and even more preferably from 600 g/L to 750 g/L. As can be recognized
by one of ordinary skill in the art, the control of improperly sized particles via
the present invention contributes to the tight span of the composition produced by
the present invention.
[0037] While not intending to be bound by theory, it is believed that solubility and compositional
quality are enhanced as a result of the particles in the detergent composition being
more of the same size. Specifically, as a result of the particles being more uniform
in size, the actual "contact points" among the particles in the detergent composition
is reduced which, in turn, reduces the "bridging effect" commonly associated with
the "lump-gel" dissolution difficulties of granular detergent compositions. Previous
granular detergent compositions contained particles of varying sizes which leads to
more contact points among the particles. For example, a large particle could have
many smaller particles in contact with it rendering the particle site ripe for lump-gel
formation. The level and uniform size of the particles in the granular detergent composition
of the present invention avoids such problems.
[0038] By "a portion" of the particles, it is meant that at least some particles in the
detergent composition contain a detersive surfactant and/or a detergent builder to
provide the fundamental building blocks of a typical detergent composition. The various
surfactants and builders as well as their respective levels in the composition are
set forth hereinafter. Typically, the detergent composition will contain from 1% to
50% by weight of a detersive surfactant and from 1% to 75% by weight of a detergent
builder.
[0039] A particularly important attribute of detergent powders is color. Color is usually
measured on a Hunter Colorimeter and reported as three parameters "L", "a" and "b".
Of particular relevance to the powdered detergent consumer is the whiteness of the
powder determined by the equation L-3b. In general, whiteness values below 60% are
considered poor. Whiteness can be improved by a number of means known to those of
ordinary skill in the art. For example, coating granules with Titanium Dioxide.
[0040] Preferably the granular detergents of this invention have whitenesses of 60-100,
preferably 75-100, more preferably, 85-100 and most preferably 92-100. Also preferred
are granular detergents where all components have a whiteness difference (maximum
- minimum) of less than 40, preferably less than 30, more preferably less than 20
and most preferably less than 10.
[0041] Another important attribute of the granular detergent products of this invention
is the shape of the individual particles. Shape can be measured in a number of different
ways known to those of ordinary skill in the art. One such method is using optical
microscopy with Optimus (V5.0) image analysis software. Important calculated parameters
are:
"Circularity" which is defined as (measured perimeter length of the particle image)2/(measured area of the particle image). The circularity of a perfectly smooth sphere
(minimum circularity) is 12.57; and
"Aspect Ratio" which is defined as the length/width of the particle image.
[0042] Each of these attributes is important and can be averaged over the bulk granular
detergent composition. And the combination of the two parameters as defined by the
product of the parameters is important as well (i.e. both must be controlled to get
a product with good appearance). Preferably, the granular detergent compositions produced
by the process of the present invention have circularities less than 50, preferably
less than 30, more preferably less than 23, most preferably less than 18. Also preferred
are granular detergent compositions with aspect ratios less than 2, preferably less
than 1.5, more preferably less than 1.3 most preferably less than 1.2.
[0043] Additionally, it is preferred to have a uniform distribution of shapes among the
particles in the composition. Specifically, the granular detergent compositions of
this invention have a standard deviation of the number distribution of circularity
less than 20, that is preferably less than 10, more preferably less than 7 most preferably
less than 4. And the standard deviation of the number distribution of aspect ratios
is preferably less than 1, more preferably less than 0,5, even more preferably less
than 0.3, most preferably less than 0.2.
[0044] In an especially preferred process of the present invention, granular detergent compositions
are produced wherein the product of circularity and aspect ratio is less than 100,
preferably less than 50, more preferably less than 30, and most preferably less than
20. Also preferred are granular detergent compositions with the standard deviation
of the number distribution of the product of circularity and aspect ratio of less
than 45, preferably less than 20, more preferably less than 7 most preferably less
than 2.
Detergent Components
[0045] The detergent composition of the present invention, preferably include surfactants
such as anionic, nonionic, zwitterionic, ampholytic and cationic classes and compatible
mixtures thereof. Detergent surfactants are described in U.S. Patent 3,664,961. Norris,
issued May 23, 1972, and in U.S. Patent 3,919,578, Laughlin et al., issued December
30, 1975). Cationic surfactants include those described in U.S. Patent 4,222,905,
Cockrell, issued September 16, 1980, and in U.S. Patent 4,239,659, Murphy, issued
December 16, 1980.
[0046] Nonlimiting examples of surfactant systems include the conventional C
11-C
18 alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS") and primary, branched-chain and random C
10-C
20 alkyl sulfates ("AS"), the C
10-C
18 secondary (2,3) alkyl sulfates of the formula CH
3(CH
2)
x(CHOSO
3-M
+) CH
3 and CH
3 (CH
2)
y(CHOSO
3-M
+) CH
2CH
3 where x and (y + 1) are integers of at least 7, preferably at least 9, and M is a
water-solubilizing cation, especially sodium, unsaturated sulfates such as oleyl sulfate,
the C
10-C
18 alkyl alkoxy sulfates ("AE
xS"; especially EO 1-7 ethoxysulfates), C
10-C
18 alkyl alkoxy carboxylates (especially the EO 1-5 ethoxycarboxylates), the C
10-18 glycerol ethers, the C
10-C
18 alkyl polyglycosides and their corresponding sulfated polyglycosides, and C
12-C
18 alpha-sulfonated fatty acid esters. If desired, the conventional nonionic and amphoteric
surfactants such as the C
12-C
18 alkyl ethoxylates ("AE") including the so-called narrow peaked alkyl ethoxylates
and C
6-C
12 alkyl phenol alkoxylates (especially ethoxylates and mixed ethoxy/propoxy), C
12-C
18 betaines and sulfobetaines ("sultaines"), C
10-C
18 amine oxides, and the like, can also be included in the surfactant system. The C
10-C
18 N-alkyl polyhydroxy fatty acid amides can also be used. Typical examples include
the C
12-C
18 N-methylglucamides. See WO 9,206,154. Other sugar-derived surfactants include the
N-alkoxy polyhydroxy fatty acid amides, such as C
10-C
18 N-(3-methoxypropyl) glucamide. The N-propyl through N-hexyl C
12-C
18 glucamides can be used for low sudsing. C
10-C
20 conventional soaps may also be used. If high sudsing is desired, the branched-chain
C
10-C
16 soaps may be used. Mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants are especially useful.
Other conventional useful surfactants are listed in standard texts.
[0047] The detergent composition can, and preferably docs, include a detergent builder.
Builders are generally selected from the various water-soluble, alkali metal, ammonium
or substituted ammonium phosphates, polyphosphates, phosphonates, polyphosphonates,
carbonates, silicates, borates, polyhydroxy sulfonates, polyacetates, carboxylates,
and polycarboxylates. Preferred are the alkali metal, especially sodium, salts of
the above. Preferred for use herein are the phosphates, carbonates, silicates, C
10-18 fatty acids, polycarboxylates, and mixtures thereof. More preferred are sodium tripolyphosphate;
tetrasodium pyrophosphate; citrate, tartrate mono- and di-succinates, sodium silicate,
and mixtures thereof (see below).
[0048] Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders are sodium and potassium tripolyphosphate,
pyrophosphate, polymeric metaphosphate having a degree of polymerization of from 6
to 21, and orthophosphates. Examples of polyphosphonate builders are the sodium and
potassium salts of ethylene diphosphonic acid, the sodium and potassium salts of ethane
1-hydroxy-1, 1-iphosphonic acid and the sodium and potassium salts of ethane, 1,1,2-triphosphonie
acid. Other phosphorus builder compounds are disclosed in U.S. Patents 3,159.581:
3,213,030: 3,422,021; 3,422,137; 3,400,176 and 3,400,148.
[0049] Examples of nonphosphorus, inorganic builders are sodium and potassium carbonate,
bicarbonate, sesquicarbonate, tetraborate decahydrate, and silicates having a weight
ratio of SiO
2 to alkali metal oxide of from 0.5 to 4.0, preferably from 1.0 to 2.4. Water-soluble,
nonphosphorus organic builders useful herein include the various alkali metal, ammonium
and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates and polyhydroxy
sulfonates. Examples of polyacetate and polycarboxylate builders are the sodium, potassium,
lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid,
nitrilotriacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, mellitic acid, benzene polycarboxylic acids,
and citric acid.
[0050] Polymeric polycarboxylate builders are set forth in U.S. Patent 3,308,067, Diehl,
issued March 7, 1967. Such materials include the water-soluble salts of homo- and
copolymers of aliphatic carboxylic acids such as maleic acid, itaconic acid, mesaconic
acid, fumaric acid, aconitic acid, citraconic acid and methylenemalonic acid. Some
of these materials are useful as the water-soluble anionic polymer as hereinafter
described, but only if in intimate admixture with the nonsoap anionic surfactant.
[0051] Other suitable polycarboxylates for use herein are the polyacetal carboxylates described
in U.S. Patent 4,144,226, issued March 13, 1979 to Crutchfield et al., and U.S. Patent
4,246,495, issued March 27, 1979 to Crutchfield et al.. These polyacetal carboxylates
can be prepared by bringing together under polymerization conditions an ester of glyoxylic
acid and a polymerization initiator. The resulting polyacetal carboxylate ester is
then attached to chemically stable end groups to stabilize the polyacetal carboxylate
against rapid depolymerization in alkaline solution, converted to the corresponding
salt, and added to a detergent composition. Particularly preferred polycarboxylate
builders are the ether carboxylate builder compositions comprising a combination of
tartrate manosuccinate and tartrate disuccinate described in U.S. Patent 4,663,071,
Bush et al., issued May 5, 1987.
[0052] Water-soluble silicate solids represented by the formula SiO
2•M
2O. M being an alkali metal, and having a SiO
2:M
2O weight ratio of from 0.5 to 4.0. are useful salts in the detergent granules of the
invention at levels of from 2% to 15% on an anhydrous weight basis, preferably from
3% to 8%. Anhydrous or hydrated particulate silicate can be utilized, as well.
[0053] Any number of additional ingredients can also be included as components in the granular
detergent composition. These include other detergency builders, bleaches, bleach activators,
suds boosters or suds suppressors, anti-tarnish and anti-corrosion agents, soil suspending
agents, soil release agents, germicides, pH adjusting agents, nonbuilder alkalinity
sources, chelating agents, smectite clays, enzymes, enzyme-stabilizing agents and
perfumes. See U.S. Patent 3,936,537, issued February 3, 1976 to Baskerville, Jr. et
al..
[0054] Bleaching agents and activators are described in U.S. Patent 4,412,934, Chung et
al., issued November 1, 1983, and in U.S. Patent 4,483,783, Hartman, issued November
20, 1984. Chelating agents are also described in U.S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al.,
from Column 17, line 54 through Column 18, line 68, incorporated herein by reference.
Suds modifiers are also optional ingredients and are described in U.S. Patents 3,933,672,
issued January 20, 1976 to Bartoletta et al., and 4,136,045, issued January 23, 1979
to Gault et al..
[0055] Suitable smectite clays for use herein are described in U.S. Patent 4,762,645, Tucker
et al., issued August 9, 1988, Column 6, line 3 through Column 7, line 24. Suitable
additional detergency builders for use herein are enumerated in the Baskerville patent,
Column 13, line 54 through Column 16, line 16, and in U.S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush
et at., issued May 5, 1987.
EXAMPLES
[0056] The following examples are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not to
be construed as limiting the scope of the appended claims in any way.
EXAMPLE 1.
[0057] This example illustrates a process according to the present invention which produces
uniform, free flowing detergent granules with good dissolution profiles. Two feed
streams of spray dried granules and dry agglomerates are continuously fed to a Lodige
KM-600 moderate speed mixer at a rate of 600 Kg/hr at equal parts. 50 kg/hr of a solution
of PEG 4000, 35 wt. % solids is added to the KM. The resulting granules are fed into
a fluid bed granulator, dryer, cooler with a gas fluidization velocity of approximately
1.5 m/s
2. An additional 50 kg/hr of PEG 4000, 35 wt. % solids is sprayed in the fluid bed.
The fluid bed is operated with a superficial velocity of 2.0 m/s
2 at the plate and a disengagement velocity of 1.4 m/s
2. Approximately, 50 kg/hr of undersized material is ellutriated in the fluid bed,
collected in a baghouse and re-introduced to the KM-600 pre-mixer. Following the fluid
bed, the product is passed through a Morgensen screener set up to remove particle
larger than 1200 microns. The oversized particles are then ground in a mill and returned
to the fluid bed granulator. The resulting product has a geometric mean particle diameter
of 600 microns and a span of 1.4.
[0058] Having thus described the invention in detail, it will be obvious to those skilled
in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the
invention and the invention is not to be considered limited to what is described in
the specification.