CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] Related subject matter is disclosed in the following application assigned to the
same assignee hereof: U.S. Patent Application entitled "Sub-Packet Adaptation In A
Wireless Communication System", Serial No. 09/725393, filed November 29, 2000.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates generally to wireless communication systems and, in
particular, to rate adaptation of data transmission in a wireless communication systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE RELATED ART
[0003] In the well-known Data Only Evolution of third generation CDMA based wireless communication
systems, hereinafter referred to as 3G-1x EVDO, voice and data services are provided
using separate frequency carriers. That is, the voice and data signals are transmitted
over separate forward links defined by different frequency carriers. Data is transmitted
over a time multiplexed frequency carrier at fixed data transmit powers but at variable
data rates. Specifically, measured Signal to Interference Ratio (SIR) at a receiver
of a pilot signal transmitted by a base station is used to determine a data rate which
can be supported by the receiver. Typically, the determined data rate corresponds
to a maximum data rate at which a minimum level of quality of service can be achieved
at the receiver. Higher measured SIR translates into higher data rates, wherein higher
data rates involve higher order modulation and weaker coding than lower data rates.
For example, if measured SIR at the receiver is 12 dB and -2dB at two different receivers,
then the data rates may be 2.4 Mb/s and 38.4 Kb/s at each of the respective receivers.
[0004] To improve system throughput, 3G-1x EVDO allows the receiver with the most favorable
channel conditions, i.e., highest measured SIR, and thereby the highest associated
data rate, to transmit ahead of receivers with comparatively less favorable channel
conditions. 3G-1x EVDO utilizes a fast rate adaptation mechanism whereby the receiver,
for every time slot, measures SIR, calculates a data rate using the measured SIR and
reports the calculated data rate to the base station. Calculated data rates from multiple
receivers are used by the base station to schedule when data transmission is to occur
for a particular receiver.
[0005] Data transmission from the base station to a particular receiver occurs when that
receiver reports the highest calculated data rate to the base station. The following
protocol is utilized in data transmissions. The base station transmits data to the
receiver in time slot n at the calculated data rate. The receiver receives the data
transmission and responds with an ACK/NACK message indicating to the base station
whether the data transmission was successfully received, i.e., no errors, by the receiver.
Specifically, if the data transmission is successfully received, the receiver responds
with an acknowledgement or ACK. Otherwise the receiver responds with a negative acknowledgement
or NACK. The ACK/NACK message is received by base station in time slot n+j, wherein
j is some known time offset. Thus, the base station can determine that an ACK/NACK
message was transmitted from a receiver to which data was transmitted j time slots
prior to receipt of the ACK/NACK message.
[0006] If an ACK was received, the base station knows that the data transmission to the
associated receiver was successful. If a NACK was received, the base station knows
that the data transmission to the associated receiver was unsuccessful. In response
to the NACK, the base station re-transmits, at the same data rate, the same data which
was earlier transmitted. Note that the term "re-transmits the same data" should be
understood to describe a retransmission of the data that may or may not be identical
to the data it is being compared to, i.e., data transmitted in a previous transmission,
so long as the data of the retransmission may be soft combined with the data to which
it is being compared. The re-transmitted data is received by the receiver in time
slot n+j+k, wherein k is some known time offset.
[0007] This prior art protocol disadvantageously utilizes the data rate of the initial transmission
for re-transmissions even if the channel conditions may have changed for the associated
receiver. Specifically, if the channel conditions degraded between the time of the
initial transmission and the re-transmission, the re-transmission will likely suffer
a higher frame error rate (FER) than the initial transmission, thereby suffering a
degradation in transmission quality. Or if the channel conditions improved, then channel
resources are being inefficiently utilized since a higher data rate could had been
used for the re-transmission.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
[0008] The present invention is a method of data rate adaptation based on channel conditions.
In the present invention, data is initially transmitted at a first data rate based
on a measured first channel condition and, if a NACK is received, the data is retransmitted.
The data retransmitted is at a rate which is based on the condition of the channel
during or before the transmission of the NACK. The data retransmission rate can also
be based on the actual channel condition at the time of the first transmission plus
the condition of the channel before or during the transmission of the NACK.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] The features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better
understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying
drawings where:
FIG. 1 depicts a flowchart illustrating the data rate adaptation technique in accordance
with one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 depicts a flowchart illustrating a manner of varying the size of the sub-packets,
the modulation scheme and number of time slots over which the sub-packets are transmitted
in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 depicts a flowchart illustrating a manner of varying the size of the sub-packets,
the modulation scheme and number of time slots over which the sub-packets are transmitted
in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 4 is an example of rate adaptation with three slots rate feedback delay.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0010] The present invention is a method of data rate adaptation based on channel conditions.
FIG. 1 depicts a flowchart 100 illustrating the data rate adaptation technique in
accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In step 110, a base station
or transmitting equipment receives rate indication messages from a plurality of receivers
to which data transmissions are intended, wherein a rate indication message may be
a channel condition measurement at a receiver or a data rate calculated based on a
channel condition measurement at a receiver. In step 115, the base station selects
a receiver at which to transmit data, wherein the selected receiver preferably is
associated with the highest data rate. In step 120, the base station transmits a sub-packet
of data to the selected receiver at the data rate indicated by the associated rate
indication message.
[0011] In another embodiment, the sub-packet transmitted in step 120 may be transmitted
at a data rate higher than the data rate indicated in the rate indication message.
The reason for doing this is to decrease the amount of time slots over which the sub-packets
are to be transmitted in step 120. Although the transmission quality may degrade because
of the increased data rate, Hybrid ARQ may be used to soft combine the sub-packets
transmitted in step 140 with the sub-packets transmitted in step 120. Under certain
conditions, e.g. at lower data rates, when using Hybrid ARQ (soft combining) throughput
efficiency of the channel can be improved through the "aggressive" use of the channel,
i.e., transmitting at higher data rates than indicated by the receiver.
[0012] The data rate at which the encoder sub-packets are transmitted may be negotiated
between the base station and receiver anytime prior to the actual transmission of
the encoder sub-packets. For example, the receiver transmits a rate indication message
to the base station indicating a data rate of 19.2 Kb/s. The base station wants to
be aggressive with the data transmission by using a data rate of 76.8 Kb/s to transmit
an encoder sub-packet to the receiver. Accordingly, the base station transmits a new
rate message to the receiver indicating the new data rate at which the base station
will be transmitting the encoder sub-packet to the receiver, wherein the new data
rate indicated may or may not be the same as the data-rate indicated in the data rate
message. Upon receipt of the new rate message, the receiver would know the data rate
to use in decoding the encoder sub-packet.
[0013] The new data rate is based on the data rate message and the size of the encoder packet.
For larger size encoder packets, it is desirable to set the new data rate as a higher
multiple, e.g., four times, of the data rate indicated in the data rate message in
order to reduce the number of time slots utilized in the transmission and to promote
scheduling flexibility. By contrast, for smaller size encoder packets, it is desirable
to set the new data rate as a lower multiple, e.g., one times, of the data rate indicated
in the data rate message in order to utilize the channel more efficiently.
[0014] Table I depicts an example lookup table which may be used in selecting a new data
rate based on the data rate indicated by the receiver and the size of the encoder
packet. For example, suppose the data rate message indicates a data rate of 38.4 Kb/s
and the encoder packet is 1,536 bits. The new rate message would then indicate a new
data rate of 153.6 Kb/s.
TABLE I
Data Rate
Indicated In Data
Rate Message
Kb/s |
Data Rates For
7,680 Bit
Encoder Packet
Kb/s |
Data Rates For
3,072 Bit
Encoder Packet
Kb/s |
Data Rates For
1,536 Bit
Encoder Packet
Kb/s |
Data Rates For
768 Bit Encoder Packet
Kb/s |
9.6 |
38.4 |
38.4 |
38.4 |
38.4 |
19.2 |
76.8 |
76.8 |
76.8 |
76.8 |
38.4 |
153.6 |
153.6 |
153.6 |
153.6 |
76.8 |
307.2 |
307.2 |
307.2 |
307.2 |
153.6 |
614.4 |
614.4 |
614.4 |
614.4 |
307.6 |
877.7 |
819.2 |
614.4 |
614.4 |
614.4 |
1228.8 |
1228.8 |
1228.8 |
614.4 |
819.2 |
1536.0 |
1228.8 |
1228.8 |
614.4 |
1228.8 |
2048.0 |
2457.6 |
1228.8 |
614.4 |
1536.0 |
3072.0 |
2457.6 |
1228.8 |
614.4 |
2048.0 |
3072.0 |
2457.6 |
1228.8 |
614.4 |
2457.6 |
3072.0 |
2457.6 |
1228.8 |
614.4 |
[0015] In step 125, the base station receives an ACK/NACK message from the selected receiver.
If the message is an ACK, in step 130, flowchart 100 returns to step 110. If the message
is a NACK, in step 135, the base station receives from the selected receiver another
rate (rate adaptation) indication message. Additionally, when a NACK is transmitted
by the receiver, the receiver stores in memory the received data which was transmitted
in step 120 such that it may later be soft combined with a re-transmission of the
same data.
[0016] An example of rate adaptation is shown in FIG. 4. The transmission rate used in slot
n is based on channel condition (quality) measurements in slot (n-3) assuming three
slots feedback delay. With Hybrid ARQ, if a frame is received in error, the receiver
stores the frame and sends back a NACK to the transmitter. The transmitter performs
a retransmission and the two transmissions can be combined and the frame can be decoded
with higher success probability. The number of transmissions/retransmission across
which the hybrid ARQ operation is done can be a larger number greater than 2.
[0017] With adaptive Hybrid ARQ, the retransmissions can be performed at a different rate
compared to the original transmission. The rate at the time of retransmission is based
on the most recent channel condition information received from the receiver. The ACK/NACK
for transmission in slot n is received in slot (n+3) where 3 is the ACK/NACK feedback
delay.
[0018] If the message is a NACK, in step 135, the base station receives from the selected
receiver another rate indication message which is based on the delayed channel condition
information that is due to feedback delay in addition to the actual channel condition
at the time of the previous transmission. Stated differently, the rate of retransmission
is based on estimating the channel condition at the time of transmission of the NACK.
The rate of retransmission can also be based on estimating two conditions, one being
channel condition at the time of transmission of the NACK; and the other estimate
being the actual channel condition at the time of the transmission of the data. The
estimates enable the transmitter to make an estimate about the quality of the previously
received information and the amount of redundant information needed to successfully
decode the received data.
[0019] In step 140, the base station re-transmits the sub-packet of data to the selected
receiver at the data rate indicated in the second rate indication message received
in step 135.
[0020] In one embodiment, the sub-packet of data transmitted in steps 120 and 140 are of
the same size but the number of time slots over which the sub-packets are transmitted
or modulation scheme may vary if the data rates in steps 120 and 140 are different.
In another embodiment, such sub-packet are of different sizes if Hybrid ARQ are used
to soft combine the sub-packets transmitted in steps 120 and 140.
[0021] In an alternate embodiment, regardless of whether the ACK/NACK message transmitted
by the selected receiver is an ACK or a NACK, flowchart 100 returns to step 110 from
step 125. In this embodiment, the re-transmission to the originally selected receiver
would not occur until the selected receiver is the receiver with the highest associated
data rate.
[0022] In a preferred embodiment, the manner in which sub-packets are transmitted in steps
120 and 140 allows for Hybrid ARQ at different data rates. This embodiment is achieved
by varying the size of the sub-packets, the modulation scheme and number of time slots
over which the sub-packets are transmitted. FIG. 2 depicts a flowchart 200 illustrating
a manner of varying the size of the sub-packets, the modulation scheme and number
of time slots over which the sub-packets are transmitted in accordance with one embodiment
of the present invention. In step 210, at the connection set-up to a new receiver,
or through other broadcast means, the base station indicates to the receiver the data
transmission rate that will be used by the base station corresponding to a rate indication
message from the receiver and each of the encoder packet sizes (as shown in Table
1). Alternatively, the base station transmits a new rate message to the selected receiver
indicating the new data rate at which the base station intends to transmit data to
the selected receiver. In another embodiment, the new rate message may be included
in the header information or along with the encoder packet size indication. In step
215, an encoder packet is processed into a specific size encoder sub-packet, wherein
the encoder packet is a block of information intended for the receiver and the encoder
sub-packet is a representation of the encoder packet which is transmitted to the receiver.
Specifically, the encoder packet is channel coded and subsequently punctured and/or
repeated to obtain a sub-packet. The size of the sub-packet being dependent on the
data rate at which the sub-packet is to be transmitted and the size of the encoder
packet.
[0023] FIG. 3 depicts an example 30 of a sub-packet formation scheme in accordance with
this embodiment of the present invention. An encoder packet comprising of 3,072 bits
is turbo coded at 1/5 rate into 15,360 bits. Note that, in this example, a same channel
coder is used to channel code the encoder packet regardless of the size of the sub-packet.
The channel coded encoder packet, i.e., 15,360 bits, then undergoes different puncturing
and/or repetition techniques to obtain four different size encoder sub-packets, wherein
the original encoder packet may be derived from each of the encoder sub-packets. Specifically,
the channel coded encoder packet is punctured and/or repeated to produce two 13,824
bit encoder sub-packets, one 24,576 bit encoder sub-packet, two 12,288 bit encoder
sub-packets and/or three 6,144 bit encoder sub-packets. The two 13,824 bit encoder
sub-packet may or may not be identical to each other. Likewise for the two 12,288
bit encoder sub-packets and three 6,144 bit encoder sub-packets. Each of the encoder
sub-packets may be soft combined with each other.
[0024] Note that each of the encoder sub-packets are associated with different data rates.
That is, the two 13,824 bit encoder sub-packets are associated with a data rate of
819.2 Kb/s; the 24,576 bit encoder sub-packet is associated with data rates of 38.4
Kb/s, 76.8 Kb/s, 153.6 Kb/s and 307.2 Kb/s; the two 12,288 bit encoder sub-packets
are associated with data rates of 614.4 Kb/s and 1288.8 Kb/s; and the three 6,144
bit encoder sub-packets are associated with a data rate of 2457.6 Kb/s. Thus, if the
data rate at which the sub-packet was to be transmitted was 153.6 Kb/s, the sub-packet
size would be 24,576 bits. Note that there exists a single sub-packet format for a
given data rate and encoder packet size. Although FIG. 3 depicts all eight different
sub-packets being simultaneously produced, all eight of the encoder sub-packets need
not be produced at the same time.
[0025] Returning to FIG. 2, in step 220, an encoder packet size identifier is added to the
encoder sub-packet, wherein the encoder packet size identifier indicates the size
of the packet from which the encoder sub-packet was derived. Based on the encoder
packet size identifier and the transmission data rate, the receiver can determine
the format of the sub-packet such that the receiver can correctly soft combine and
jointly decode the associated encoder sub-packet with a re-transmission or a prior
transmission of an encoder sub-packet derived from the same encoder packet (although
the latter sub-packet may be in a different format). Recall that there exists a single
sub-packet format for a given data rate and encoder packet size. The data rate is
known to the receiver based on one of many alternate embodiments discussed above.
The transmission data rate is mapped from the rate indication message from the receiver,
either based on a mapping that is indicated to the receiver at connection set-up,
or on a broadcast channel. Otherwise, the transmission data rate is transmitted in
a message or in data header information to the receiver.
[0026] In another embodiment, whether or not there exists a single sub-packet format for
a given data rate and encoder packet size, an encoder sub-packet format identifier
may be added to the encoder sub-packet in lieu of, or in conjunction with, the encoder
sub-packet size identifier. The encoder sub-packet format identifier indicating a
format of the associated encoder sub-packet such that the receiver knows how to derive
the encoder packet from the encoder sub-packet.
[0027] In step 225, the encoder sub-packet is modulated and transmitted to the receiver
over one or more time slots. The type of modulation scheme used to modulate the encoder
sub-packet depends on the new data rate. Table II depicts an example lookup table
which may be used in selecting a modulation scheme based on the new data rate. As
can be seen, higher modulations (with more bits per symbol) are required to achieve
the higher data rates. For example, if the new data rate is 307.2 Kb/s, then the modulation
scheme used to transmit the encoder sub-packet would be QPSK.
TABLE II
New Data Rate |
Modulation Scheme |
9.6 |
QPSK |
19.2 |
QPSK |
38.4 |
QPSK |
76.8 |
QPSK |
153.6 |
QPSK |
307.2 |
QPSK |
614.4 |
QPSK |
819.2 |
8-PSK |
1228.8 |
QPSK/16-QAM |
1536.0 |
16-QAM |
2048.0 |
16-QAM |
2457.6 |
16-QAM |
3072.2 |
16-QAM |
[0028] The number of time slots used in the transmission of the encoder sub-packet depends
on the new data rate and the size of the encoder packet (or encoder sub-packet). Table
III depicts an example lookup table which may used in determining the number of time
slots required for transmitting a particular size encoder packet at the new data rate.
TABLE III
7,680 Bit
Encoder Packet |
3,072 Bit
Encoder Packet |
1,536 Bit
Encoder Packet |
768 Bit
Encoder Packet |
Data
Rate |
Time
Slots |
Data
Rate |
Time
Slots |
Data
Rate |
Time
Slots |
Data
Rate |
Time
Slots |
38.4 |
160 |
38.4 |
64 |
38.4 |
32 |
38.4 |
16 |
76.8 |
80 |
76.8 |
32 |
76.8 |
16 |
76.8 |
8 |
153.6 |
40 |
153.6 |
16 |
153.6 |
8 |
153.6 |
4 |
307.2 |
20 |
307.2 |
8 |
307.2 |
4 |
307.2 |
2 |
614.4 |
10 |
614.4 |
4 |
614.4 |
2 |
614.4 |
1 |
877.7 |
7 |
819.2 |
3 |
614.4 |
2 |
614.4 |
1 |
1228.8 |
5 |
1228.8 |
2 |
1228.8 |
1 |
614.4 |
1 |
1536.0 |
4 |
1228.8 |
2 |
1228.8 |
1 |
614.4 |
1 |
2048.0 |
3 |
2457.6 |
1 |
1228.8 |
1 |
614.4 |
1 |
3072.0 |
2 |
2457.6 |
1 |
1228.8 |
1 |
614.4 |
1 |
3072.0 |
2 |
2457.6 |
1 |
1228.8 |
1 |
614.4 |
1 |
3072.0 |
2 |
2457.6 |
1 |
1228.8 |
1 |
614.4 |
1 |
[0029] Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference
to certain embodiments, other versions are possible. For example, the present invention
is also applicable to encoder packets which are not 3,072 bits in size; the encoder
sub-packet sizes may vary; the data rate at which particular encoder sub-packets may
vary; etc. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the present invention should not be
limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein.
1. A method of transmitting data
characterized by the steps of:
a) transmitting data in a time slot n;
b) receiving channel condition information during a different time slot from a receiver
to which the data was intended, indicating that receipt of the transmitted data was
not successful; and
c) determining a data rate for retransmission of the data based on the received channel
condition information.
2. The method of claim 1, characterized in that the step of determining the data rate for retransmission comprises the step of estimating
the channel condition prior to retransmission.
3. The method of claim 1, characterized in that the step of determining the data rate for retransmission comprises estimating the
amount of redundancy of data needed for successful decoding.
4. The method of claim I further
characterized by the step of:
receiving channel quality information for a second time slot from the receiver, and
using the channel quality information for the first and second time slots to determine
the data rate for retransmission.
5. The method of claim 4 characterized in that the second time slot is a slot that is subsequent to the first time slot.
6. The method of claim 4 characterized in that the first and second data transmissions are identical.
7. The method of claim 4 characterized in that the first data transmission may be soft combined with the second data transmission.
8. The method of claim 4
characterized by the additional step of:
receiving, prior to the step of determining the first data rate, a rate indication
message indicating the first data rate for the receiver.
9. The method of claim 4
characterized by the additional step of:
receiving, after the step of determining the first data rate and prior to the step
of determining the second data rate, a rate indication message indicating the second
data rate for the receiver.
10. The method of claim 4 characterized in that the first data rate is a higher data rate than a data rate indicated in a received
rate indication message.