BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
[0001] This invention relates to a heat shielding apparatus for a vertical continuous annealing
furnace in which heat treatment is performed on a metal strip while the strip is continuously
transported.
2. Description of Related Art
[0002] Recently, an annealing process for recrystallizing steel strip after being subjected
to cold rolling and for imparting good workability to the steel strip has been primarily
carried out by continuous annealing instead of batch annealing. As a continuous annealing
furnace for carrying out the continuous annealing, there are known horizontal continuous
annealing furnaces, in which annealing is performed on a strip traveling along a horizontal
pass, and vertical continuous annealing furnaces, in which a plurality of rolls are
arranged in upper and lower portions of the furnace and annealing is performed on
a strip traveling along a vertical pass. Of these continuous annealing furnaces, the
vertical furnace is more advantageous for a mass-production process that is realized
by increasing the passing (threading) speed of the strip.
[0003] Also, at present, indirect heating using a radiant tube is prevalent as a heating
source for the vertical continuous annealing furnace, and steel strip is mainly heated
with radiant heat from the heating source.
[0004] In a vertical continuous annealing furnace wherein a plurality of rolls are arranged
in upper and lower portions of the furnace and annealing is performed on a steel strip
being transported in the vertical direction by the rolls, while changing a travel
direction from upward to downward or vice versa as the strip turns around each roll,
it is important to prevent the steel strip from snaking or mistracking and to ensure
stable passage of the strip. Generally, as shown in Fig. 11, each roll 12 arranged
in the furnace is designed to have a convex roll crown with both shoulders tapered
toward the ends. This design is intended to make the steel strip pass the furnace
so that the strip always travels in match with the roll center, by utilizing a centering
force (arrow F) acting on the strip, which has ridden over a tapered portion, in a
direction from the roll edge toward the roll center based on a self-centering motion
of the strip wound on the tapered portion of the roll with angle.
[0005] As shown in Fig. 12, however, radiant heat from a heating source (e.g., a radiant
tube) 14 provided in the furnace heats not only a steel strip 10, but also the roll
12 arranged in the furnace. Therefore, an actual crown of the roll arranged in the
furnace is given by the sum of a crown initially imparted to the roll (called an initial
crown) and a crown imparted by the radiant heat from the heating source (called a
thermal crown). As a result, when the temperature of the steel strip is lower than
the roll temperature and when the thermal crown is larger than the initial crown,
the temperature of a roll central portion is relatively reduced and the roll crown
is rendered concave as indicated by solid lines in Fig. 12. If the steel strip 10
travels over the roll 12 having such a concave crown, a force produced in the width
direction of the steel strip acts from the roll center toward the roll edge. Accordingly,
once the steel strip undergoes snaking or mistracking, the strip is forced to ride
over the roll edge beyond it at a stroke, which causes the problem during the strip
passage that the strip comes into contact with the furnace wall.
[0006] To cope with this problem, some devices are proposed to prevent the roll temperature
from being higher than the strip temperature, so, a shield plate has previously been
provided to intercept the heat radiated from the heating source 14 toward the roll
12, as disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Utility Model Application Publication No.
63-119661. Also, Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 57-79123 discloses
a shielding apparatus employing a heat-resistant tube through which air, nitrogen
gas or the like, flows for cooling.
[0007] Further, in view of the finding that a shield plate alone is not sufficient to suppress
the thermal crown, Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 52-71318
discloses a technique for spraying cooling gas to the roll to control the thermal
crown in a positive way. Moreover, for the same purpose, Japanese Unexamined Patent
Application Publication No. 53-119208 discloses a technique for water-cooling a roll
edge portion, or changing a thermal conductivity between the roll central portion
and the roll edge portion. In addition, Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No. 53-130210 and Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 57-23733 disclose techniques
for arranging, separately from the rolls, a cooling apparatus that forms a cooling
flow path.
[0008] Among the above-mentioned examples of the related art, techniques for suppressing
the thermal crown imparted to the roll in a positive way are effective in preventing
snaking of the strip, but have the problem of requiring a very large amount of equipment
investment. Another problem is that, because of an increase in size of the apparatus
itself, heat capacity of the apparatus is necessarily increased, which deteriorates
the fuel unit consumption in the heating zone.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] This invention has been made with the view of overcoming the above-described problems
of the related art. An object of this invention is to provide an inexpensive and more
efficient apparatus on the basis of the radiant heat shielding apparatus employing
a cooling tube, which is disclosed in the above-cited Japanese Unexamined Patent Application
Publication No. 57-79123, for example.
[0010] To achieve the above object, this invention provides a radiant heat shielding apparatus
for a vertical continuous annealing furnace, in which a plurality of rolls are arranged
in upper and lower portions of the furnace and heat treatment is performed on metal
strip continuously transported by the rolls. The strip is transported in the vertical
direction by the rolls while changing the travel direction from upward to downward,
or from downward to upward, as the metal strip turns around each of the rolls. The
radiant heat shielding apparatus is disposed below the roll positioned in the upper
portion of the furnace, and/or above the roll positioned in the lower portion of the
furnace, for intercepting heat radiated from a heating source provided within the
furnace. Preferably, the radiant heat shielding apparatus is positioned just below
the roll in the upper portion of the furnace, and/or just above the roll in the lower
portion of the furnace. The radiant heat shielding apparatus comprises a double-walled
tube including an inner tube having an outside atmosphere suction port projected horizontally
or downward to be exposed to an outside atmosphere, and an outer tube having an exhaust
port projected upward to be exposed to the outside atmosphere.
[0011] In the radiant heat shielding apparatus, preferably, the outer diameter D of the
outer tube of the double-walled tube is not less than about 60 mm, the level difference
H between the outside atmosphere suction port and the exhaust port of the double-walled
tube is not less than about 150 mm, and the outer diameter D (unit: m) of the outer
tube of the double-walled tube and the level difference H (unit: m) satisfy the following
relationship:

[0012] Further, according to this invention, some embodiments of the radiant heat shielding
apparatus comprise a plurality of double-walled tubes as described above. The double-walled
tubes are horizontally arranged just below the roll positioned in the upper portion
of the furnace and/or just above the roll positioned in the lower portion of the furnace.
[0013] Alternatively, in some embodiments, the radiant heat shielding apparatus comprises
one or more double-walled tubes as described above, and the double-walled tubes are
used as support tubes and a shield plate is attached to the support tubes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014]
Fig. 1 is a vertical sectional view showing the construction of a double-walled tube
for use in a first embodiment of a radiant heat shielding apparatus according to this
invention;
Fig. 2 includes side views and front views showing, for comparison, arrangements of
a conventional example using a flat plate, a comparative example using a simple cooling
tube, and the first embodiment using a cooling tube in the form of the double-walled
tube according to this invention;
Fig. 3 is a graph showing, for comparison, the relationships between the flow rate
of cooling gas (Q) and the surface temperature of an outer tube of each double-walled
tube and a flat plate for explaining the principles of this invention;
Fig. 4 is a graph showing the relationship among the flow rate of cooling gas, the
temperature difference (ΔT) on a roll in the width direction of a strip, and the occurrence
of snaking of the strip;
Fig. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the flow rate of cooling gas and
the product of the square of an outer diameter (D) of the outer tube and the square
root of level difference (H);
Fig. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between the flow rate of cooling gas (Q)
and the level difference (H);
Fig. 7 is a side view showing the construction of a second embodiment of the radiant
heat shielding apparatus according to this invention;
Fig. 8 is a side view showing the construction of a third embodiment of the radiant
heat shielding apparatus according to this invention;
Fig. 9 is a graph showing, for comparison, the incidence of snaking in the conventional
example using a flat plate, the comparative example using a simple cooling tube, and
this invention;
Fig. 10 is a graph showing, for comparison, the replacement frequency of the radiant
heat shielding apparatus in the conventional example, the comparative example, and
this invention;
Fig. 11 is a front view showing a roll that is arranged in a furnace and has a convex
roll crown;
Fig. 12 is a front view showing a state where a strip is transported by a roll that
is arranged in a furnace and has a concave crown due to a thermal crown imparted to
the roll; and
Fig. 13 is a schematic view of an annealing furnace including an embodiment of the
radiant heat shielding apparatus of this invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0015] Embodiments of this invention will be described below in detail with reference to
the drawings.
[0016] A radiant heat shielding apparatus of this invention is disposed below (preferably
just below) a roll positioned in an upper portion of a vertical continuous annealing
furnace, and/or positioned above (preferably just above) a roll positioned in a lower
portion of the furnace, for intercepting heat radiated from a heating source that
is provided within the furnace, and the heat shielding apparatus is almost parallel
to the roll.
[0017] In a first embodiment of this invention, as shown in Fig. 1, the radiant heat shielding
apparatus has a structure of a double-walled tube 20 comprising an inner tube 22 having
an outside atmosphere suction port 23 projected downward to be exposed to an outside
atmosphere, and an outer tube 24 having an exhaust port 25 projected upward to be
exposed to the outside atmosphere. With such a structure, an inexpensive and more
efficient radiant heat shielding apparatus can be realized by effectively utilizing
natural convection of the outside atmosphere (e.g., air).
[0018] Further, as a result of repeated experiments on the relationship among the flow rate
of cooling gas (air) flowing through the double-walled tube 20, a radiant heat shielding
effect, and high-temperature creep resistance of the double-walled tube, the inventors
discovered a condition range suitable for intercepting the radiant heat in which an
outer diameter D of the outer tube 24 of the double-walled tube 20 is not less than
about 60 mm, a level difference (distance) H between the outside atmosphere suction
port 23 and the exhaust port 25 is not less than about 150 mm, and the outer diameter
D (unit: m) of the outer tube 24 of the double-walled tube and the level difference
H (unit: m) satisfy the following formula (1):

[0019] Heat-resistant alloy steel is an exemplary suitable material for forming the double-walled
tube 20. For example, stainless steel having a Cr content of not less than about 18
wt% and a Ni content of not less than about 8 wt%, or special steel having high heat
resistance, are preferred materials.
[0020] The inventors discovered that the radiant heat shielding apparatus employing a conventional
cooling tube, disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No.
57-79123, has a limitation in its cooling capability utilizing natural convection
of an outside atmosphere (air). Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No. 57-79123 discloses that air for cooling is forced to flow into the cooling tube
by a suction blower, or by a pressure blower. However, when a blower is provided on
the suction side, the blower sucks exhaust gas at high temperatures, and therefore
the blower must itself be made heat-resistant, or else a device for cooling suction
gas must be provided upstream of the blower. In any case, the equipment cost is necessarily
increased. On the other hand, when a pressure blower is used to force the cooling
air to flow into the cooling tube, there is risk that a metal (or steel) strip is
oxidized due to leakage of the air from the cooling tube into the furnace.
[0021] Based on the above findings, the inventors fabricated radiant heat shielding apparatuses
having three types of structures shown in Fig. 2, and conducted tests on those actual
apparatuses.
[0022] The left side of Fig. 2 represents a conventional example using a shield plate 16
in the form of a simple flat plate. A strip 10 (typically, a steel strip); a roll
12 arranged in a furnace; and a heating source 14 (typically, a radiant tube) are
shown. The center of Fig. 2 represents a comparative example using a cooling tube
18 in the form of a simple straight double-walled tube. The right side of Fig. 2 represents
the first embodiment of this invention including a cooling tube 20 in the form of
the double-walled tube shown in Fig. 1.
[0023] Fig. 3 is a graph showing test results obtained by measuring a surface temperature
of an outer tube of each double-walled tube and a flat plate (on the side facing the
roll 12 arranged in the furnace), which is represented by the vertical axis, relative
to a flow rate of cooling gas (air) measured at the exhaust port of the outer tube
of each double-walled tube, which is represented by the horizontal axis. Measurement
conditions were set such that the furnace temperature was 900°C, the temperature of
the outside atmosphere (cooling gas) was 300°C, the outer tube diameter of the double-walled
tube was 100 mm, the inner tube diameter of the double-walled tube was 40 mm, and
the level difference H between the outside atmosphere suction port 23 and the exhaust
port 25 of the double-walled tube was 200 mm.
[0024] In the comparative example using the cooling tube (simple straight double-walled
tube) in which no improvements were made on the outside atmosphere suction port and
the exhaust port, as indicated by marks Δ in Fig. 3, the flow rate of the cooling
gas due to natural convection was small and the outer tube surface temperature of
the double-walled tube reached 800°C.
[0025] In the conventional example (using the flat plate), as indicated by marks □, the
surface temperature of the flat plate reached 860 °C.
[0026] By contrast, in the first embodiment of this invention in which the double-walled
tube was improved to have the outside atmosphere suction port and the exhaust port
projected respectively downward and upward to be exposed to the outside atmosphere,
as indicated by marks ○ in Fig. 3, the flow rate of the cooling gas reached to 5.0
× 10
-3 (Nm
3/s) and the surface temperature of the outer tube was reduced down to about 500°C.
[0027] Fig. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the flow rate of cooling gas (air)
measured at the exhaust port of the outer tube of the double-walled tube according
to this invention and a temperature difference ΔT developed on a temperature measuring
roll in the width direction of a strip. The roll temperature measured had thermocouples
embedded therein in the width direction of the roll and was positioned just above
the radiant heat shielding apparatus which is almost paralell to the roll. Measurement
conditions were set such that the length of a roll barrel was 2000 mm, the average
width of steel strips passed through the furnace was 1260 mm, and the average furnace
temperature was 900°C. Herein, the temperature difference ΔT was defined by ΔT = Te
(roll surface temperature at a point spaced 100 mm from the roll edge) - Tc (roll
surface temperature at the roll center). The graph of Fig. 4 shows that the minimum
temperature difference ΔT, at which the roll crown is rendered concave and the steel
strip undergoes snaking, is about 150°C, and that the flow rate of the cooling gas
required for preventing snaking of the steel strip is not less than 3.0 × 10
-3 (Nm
3/s).
[0028] In the above-described first embodiment of this invention, the outside atmosphere
suction port is described as being projected downward. However, the outside atmosphere
suction port is not limited to such an arrangement. The outside atmosphere suction
port may alternatively be projected at a different orientation, e.g., horizontally.
[0029] In the radiant heat shielding apparatus according to this invention, which comprises
a double-walled tube having an outside atmosphere suction port projected horizontally
or downward to be exposed to the outside atmosphere, and an exhaust port projected
upward to be exposed to the outside atmosphere, the chimney effect developed on a
flow in the double-walled tube from suction of the outside atmosphere to exhaust thereof
is utilized to satisfy the above-mentioned required flow rate of the cooling gas.
[0030] From the law of conservation of mass for a fluid, the flow rate Q (m
3/s) of the cooling gas is given by the following equation:

where Vg is the flow speed (m/s) of the cooling gas at the exhaust port and D is
the outer diameter (m) of the outer tube.
[0031] Also, from the law of conservation of energy for a fluid, the flow speed (m/s) of
the cooling gas at the exhaust port is given by the following equation:

where g is the acceleration of gravity (= 9.8 m/s
2) and H is the level difference (m) between the outside atmosphere suction port and
the exhaust port of the double-walled tube.
[0032] Combining formulae (2) and (3) results in the formula:

[0033] According to formula (4), the flow rate Q of the cooling gas is proportional to the
outer diameter D of the outer tube and is also proportional to the square root of
the level difference H between the outside atmosphere suction port and the exhaust
port of the double-walled tube.
[0034] Fig. 5 is a graph plotting actually measured data representing the relationship between
the parameter D
2 ×

indicated by the horizontal axis, and the flow rate Q (Nm
3/s) of the cooling gas, indicated by the vertical axis. The graph of Fig. 5 shows
that D
2 ×

≥ 2.2 × 10
-3 is needed to satisfy the required flow rate Q of the cooling gas that is not less
than about 3.0 × 10
-3 (Nm
3/s). Stated otherwise, it is known that the furnace temperature ranges from about
500°C to about 900°C during actual operation, and when the furnace is within this
temperature range, the flow rate of the cooling gas not less than the above-mentioned
value is sufficient to achieve the desired cooling. Thus, if D
2 ×

≥ 2.2 × 10
-3 is satisfied, a sufficient cooling effect can be provided during actual operation.
[0035] Fig. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between the flow rate Q (Nm
3/s) of the cooling gas and the level difference H (mm) between the outside atmosphere
suction port and the exhaust port of the double-walled tube. The graph of Fig. 6 shows
that if the level difference is less than about 150 mm, the cooling gas becomes difficult
to flow because the level difference H is substantially at the same level as that
corresponding to the diameter of the double-walled tube. Therefore, the level difference
H between the outside atmosphere suction port and the exhaust port of the double-walled
tube is preferably set to be not less than about 150 mm.
[0036] Also, if the outer diameter of the outer tube of the double-walled tube is small,
the outer tube is more easily susceptible to creep due to the radiant heat. From the
actual operation of the invention experienced so far, it has been confirmed that the
outer diameter of the outer tube is preferably not less than about 60 mm.
[0037] Further, the outer diameter ratio between the outer tube and the inner tube of the
double-walled tube is preferably in the range of from about 2.0 to about 4.0.
[0038] The outer tube is preferably made of stainless steel having a Cr content of not less
than about 18 wt% and a Ni content of not less than about 8 wt%, which is represented
by, for example, SUS304, SUS316 and SUS316L according to the JIS (Japanese Industrial
Standards).
[0039] When installing the double-walled tube, the outside atmosphere suction port of the
double-walled tube is preferably spaced about 100 mm or more from the furnace wall.
[0040] When the roll arranged in the furnace has a diameter several times as large as that
of the double-walled tube of the radiant heat shielding apparatus, it is difficult
to sufficiently intercept the heat radiated from the heating source toward the roll
surface by using the radiant heat shielding apparatus that comprises one unit of double-walled
tube. In such case, the radiant heat can be effectively intercepted by other embodiments
of this invention shown in Figs. 7 and 8. In the second embodiment of the invention
shown in Fig. 7, a plurality of double-walled tubes 20 are arranged side-by-side horizontally
just below the roll positioned in the upper portion of the furnace, and/or positioned
just above the roll positioned in the lower portion of the furnace.
[0041] In the third embodiment of the invention shown in Fig. 8, one or more (two are shown)
double-walled tubes 20 are used as support tubes and a shield plate 30 is attached
to the support tubes as illustrated. Figs. 7 and 8 also show the arrangement of rolls
12, heating sources 14 and strips 10.
Example
[0042] Based on the above-described results obtained from the tests performed on actual
apparatuses, the double-walled tube shown in Fig. 1 was fabricated using SUS316 stainless
steel. The double-walled tube had an outer diameter D of the outer tube of 114.3 mm,
an inner diameter of the outer tube of 97.1 mm, an outer diameter of the inner tube
of 48.0 mm, and an inner diameter of the inner tube of 41.2 mm. The level difference
H between the outside atmosphere suction port and the exhaust port of the double-walled
tube was 200 mm. A plurality of radiant heat shielding apparatuses each comprising
the double-walled tube thus fabricated were installed in upper and lower stages of
a heating zone of a vertical continuous annealing furnace, as shown in Fig. 13. The
radiant heat shielding apparatus was installed in the upper stage of the heating zone
at a level spaced 400 mm from each roll just below it. Also, the radiant heat shielding
apparatus was installed in the lower stage of the heating zone at a level spaced 400
mm from each roll just above it. The shielding effect of the actually installed radiant
heat shielding apparatus was measured by operating the furnace for about two years
under ordinary conditions.
[0043] Results of the measurement are shown in Fig. 9 (incidence of snaking) and Fig. 10
(replacement frequency of the radiant heat shielding apparatus). In this invention,
as shown in Fig. 9, the incidence of snaking is reduced down to about 1/3 as compared
with both the conventional and comparative radiant heat shielding apparatuses using
respectively a flat plate and a simple cooling tube. Also, as shown in Fig. 10, the
useful life of the radiant heat shielding apparatus is greatly prolonged in this invention
as compared with both the conventional and comparative apparatuses, because the cooling
action is enhanced in this invention by effectively utilizing the chimney effect developed
on a flow in the cooling tube from suction of the outside atmosphere to exhaust thereof.
[0044] Additionally, in the arrangement of Fig. 13, the radiant heat shielding apparatus
of this invention including double-walled tubes 20 is disposed in the upper stage
at a position between adjacent passes, i.e., at a position not just below each roll
12, as well. The shielding effect can be increased by so arranging the radiant heat
shielding apparatus.
[0045] As described above, this invention can provide a radiant heat shielding apparatus,
which is inexpensive, effective in preventing snaking of a strip, and has the prolonged
useful life, because of effective utilization of the chimney effect that is developed
for flow in a double-walled cooling tube from suction of an outside atmosphere to
exhaust thereof.