BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention generally relates to an ultrasonic receiving apparatus. More
specifically, the present invention is directed to an optical converting type ultrasonic
receiving apparatus capable of detecting ultrasonic waves by using light.
Description of a Related Art
[0002] Conventionally, when three-dimensional images of an object to be inspected are acquired
by employing ultrasonic waves (beams), a plurality of two-dimensional images as to
sectional views along depth directions thereof have been acquired, and then the acquired
two-dimensional images have been synthesized with each other. This two-dimensional
image is acquired in such a manner that an object to be inspected is scanned by employing
a one-dimensional sensor array equipped with a position sensor. Furthermore, a plurality
of two-dimensional images acquired in a time sequential manner are synthesized with
each other, so that a three-dimensional image of this object can be obtained.
[0003] However, in accordance with this image acquisition method, there is a time lag along
the scanning direction of the one-dimensional sensor array. As a result, sectional
images acquired at different time instants are synthesized with each other, so that
a synthesized image would become burring. As a consequence, this three-dimensional
image acquisition method is not suitable for imaging an object having motion such
as a living object or a biological body.
[0004] In order to acquire a three-dimensional image in real time, while such a two-dimensional
sensor array is necessary required by which a two-dimensional image of an object can
be acquired by employing a sensor array without scanning the object, development of
such a sensor array is strongly desired.
[0005] Generally speaking, in ultrasonic diagnosing apparatus, as elements used to transmit
and receive ultrasonic waves (namely, transducer elements or ultrasonic probes), piezoelectric
ceramics typically known as PZT (lead titanate zirconate), and also polymer piezoelectric
elements such as PVDF (polyvinyl difluoride) have been employed. While these elements
are employed, such a method of manufacturing the above-described two-dimensional array
has been considered. However, in the case where the above-explained ultrasonic transmission/reception
piezoelectric elements such as PZT and PVDF are employed, theses piezoelectric elements
are necessarily required to be processed in very fine modes, and furthermore, wiring
works for a very large number of very fine piezoelectric elements are also required.
Therefore, it is practically difficult to manufacture these piezoelectric elements
in very finer modes and also in higher integration degrees, as compared with those
of the presently-available piezoelectric elements. Also, even if these technical difficulties
may be solved in near future, then other problems will apparently occur. That is,
crosstalk among these piezoelectric elements will be increased, S/N ratios will be
deteriorated due to increases of electric impedance caused by very fine wiring lines,
and/or electrode portions of very fine piezoelectric elements will be readily destroyed.
As a consequence, such a two-dimensional sensor array with employment of the above-described
PZT and PVDF can be hardly realized.
[0006] On the other hand, as ultrasonic sensors without using such piezoelectric materials
such as PZT, another detecting type of sensor (will be referred to an "optical detecting
type" hereinafter) is known by which ultrasonic signals are converted into optical
signals, while utilizing optical fibers. As such optical detecting type ultrasonic
sensors, the following sensors have been reported, namely, ultrasonic sensor with
employment of a fiber Bragg grating (will be abbreviated as an "FBG" hereinafter,
see "Underwater Acoustic Sensor with Fiber Bragg Grating" written by TAKAHASHI et.
al. of National Defense Academy in Japan, OPTICAL REVIEW Vol. 4, No. 6, in 1997. pages
691 to 694), and an ultrasonic sensor with employment of a Fabry-Pérot resonator (will
be abbreviated as an "FPR" hereinafter) structure (see "Fabrication and Performance
of a Fiber Optic Micro-Probe for Megahertz Ultrasonic Field Measurements" written
by UNO et. al., of Tokyo Institute of Technology, T. IEE Japan, Vol. 118-E, No. 11,
in 1998).
[0007] The above-mentioned document written by TAKAHASHI et. al., clearly describes such
a fact that when the fiber Bragg grating is employed as the ultrasonic sensor, this
ultrasonic sensor could sense ultrasonic waves in such a relatively low frequency
range defined on the order of 20kHz at a certain sensitivity. However, this document
never describes such ultrasonic waves in megahertz frequency ranges which are used
in actual ultrasonic diagnosing operations. As a consequence, in order that such an
ultrasonic sensor is actually available in ultrasonic diagnosing operations, ultrasonic
operations with respect to such ultrasonic waves in frequency ranges higher than that
of the ultrasonic sensor written as the example in this document should be confirmed.
Also, if required, various conditions for achieving better sensitivities in such higher
frequency ranges should also be acquired.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems, and therefore,
has an object to provide such an optical converting type ultrasonic receiving apparatus
with employment of an ultrasonic detecting element capable of satisfying a condition
under which a better ultrasonic sensitivity thereof can be obtained.
[0009] To solve the above-explained problems, an ultrasonic receiving apparatus, according
to the present invention, comprises an ultrasonic detecting element for modulating
light on the basis of ultrasonic waves applied thereto, the ultrasonic detecting element
including an ultrasonic sensible portion having a length not larger than 3/4 of a
wavelength of ultrasonic waves propagated therethrough; and a photodetector for detecting
light output from the ultrasonic detecting element.
[0010] In accordance with the present invention, since the length of the ultrasonic sensible
portion is limited on the basis of the wavelength of the ultrasonic waves propagated
through this ultrasonic sensible portion, such an ultrasonic receiving apparatus can
be obtained which has the higher sensitivity with respect to the ultrasonic waves
to be detected.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] For a better understanding of the present invention, reference is made of a detailed
description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a diagram for illustratively indicating a basic idea of an ultrasonic receiving
apparatus according to a first embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a diagram for illustratively indicating an ultrasonic detecting element
of Fig. 1 in an enlarging manner;
Fig. 3A and Fig. 3B are graphic representations for representing experimental results
obtained in such a manner that while ultrasonic waves are applied to sensors having
different sensor lengths, detection signals output from these sensors are observed;
Fig. 4 is a graphic representation for representing simulation results obtained in
such a manner that while ultrasonic waves are applied to sensors having different
sensor lengths, detection signals output from these sensors are observed;
Fig. 5 is a diagram for illustratively showing a basic idea capable of detecting ultrasonic
waves by using a Bragg grating;
Fig. 6 is a diagram for indicating one modification of the above-described ultrasonic
receiving apparatus according to the first embodiment as shown in Fig. 1;
Fig. 7 is a diagram for representing another modification of the above-explained ultrasonic
receiving apparatus as shown in Fig. 1;
Fig. 8 is a diagram for showing a basic idea of an ASE optical source as shown in
Fig. 7;
Fig. 9 is a diagram for illustratively indicating a basic idea of an ultrasonic receiving
apparatus according to a second embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 10 is a diagram for illustratively showing an ultrasonic detecting element of
Fig. 9 in an enlarging manner; and
Fig. 11 is a diagram for illustratively indicating a basic idea of an ultrasonic receiving
apparatus according to a third embodiment of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0012] Referring now to drawings, various preferred embodiments of the present invention
will be described in detail. It should be understood that the same reference numerals
will be employed as those for denoting the same, or similar structural elements and
explanation thereof is omitted.
[0013] Fig. 1 illustratively shows basic idea of an ultrasonic receiving apparatus according
to a first embodiment of the present invention. This ultrasonic receiving apparatus
contains a light source 11 used to generate single mode laser light having a single
wavelength defined from, preferably, 500nm to 1600nm. The laser light (beam) generated
from the light source 11 is entered into an beam separator 12, while this beam separator
12 is constituted by employing a half mirror, an optical circulator, or a polarization
beam splitter, or the like. The beam separator 12 may cause incident light entered
from a first direction to pass therethrough along a second direction, and also may
cause reflection light returned from the second direction to pass therethrough along
a third direction different from this first direction. In this first embodiment, the
half mirror is employed as the beam separator 12. The half mirror may cause the incident
light to pass therethrough, and may cause the reflection light returned from the direction
opposite to the incident light to reflect thereon along such a direction defined at
an angle of substantially 90 degrees with respect to the incident direction.
[0014] The light which has been derived from the optical source 11 and then has penetrated
the beam separator 12 is entered into the optical fiber 13. This optical fiber 13
may be preferably made as a single mode fiber.
[0015] At a tip portion of this optical fiber 13, a Bragg grating portion containing a Bragg
grating mechanism is formed as an ultrasonic sensible portion, by which an ultrasonic
detecting element 17 is constituted.
[0016] Fig. 2 is a diagram for showing the ultrasonic detecting element of Fig. 1 in an
enlarging manner. The Bragg grating portion is constructed in such a manner that two
sorts of material layers (namely, optical transmission media) having different refractive
indexes are mutually overlapped with each other in a predetermined pitch capable of
satisfying the Bragg's reflection condition, while a total number of these overlapped
material layers is selected to be several thousands. That is, Fig. 2 indicates a material
layer "A" having a refractive index "n
1", and another material layer "B" having another refractive index "n
2". Assuming now that the pitch (interval) between periodic structures of these material
layers is selected to be "d", and also, a wavelength of incident light of this ultrasonic
detecting element 17 is selected to be "λ", the Bragg's reflection condition is expressed
by the following formula (1). It should be noted that symbol "m" indicates an arbitrary
integer in this formula (1).

In this formula (1), symbol "θ" represents an incident angle which is measured from
an incident plane. Assuming now that the incident angle "θ" is equal to π/2, the below-mentioned
formula (2) may be obtained:

The Bragg's grating portion may selectively reflect a specific wavelength component
of the incident light capable of satisfying this Bragg's reflection condition, and
may penetrate therethrough other wavelength components thereof.
[0017] When ultrasonic waves (ultrasonic beams) are propagated through the above-described
Bragg grating portion, this Bragg grating portion is distorted to change the pitch
"d" of the above-described periodic structure. As a result, the selectively reflected
wavelength component "λ" is changed. Within a reflection characteristic of the Bragg
grating portion, an inclined band where reflectance is varied is present before/after
a center wavelength at which reflectance becomes the largest value (namely, transmittance
becomes low) . While detection light having a center wavelength in a range of this
inclined band is entered into the Bragg grating portion, ultrasonic waves are applied
to this Bragg grating portion. As a result, a change in intensity of reflection light
(otherwise, transmission light) can be monitored, which occurs in response to strengths
of the applied ultrasonic waves. Thus, the intensity of the applied ultrasonic waves
can be measured by converting this intensity of the reflection light.
[0018] Referring back to Fig. 1, light entered into the optical fiber 13 is modulated by
the Bragg grating portion to be reflected. Then, this reflection light is again entered
into the beam separator 12 by which the propagation path (travel path) of this reflection
light is changed. The light derived from this beam separator 12 is entered into an
photodetector 16, while this photodetector 16 is constructed of a CCD (charge-coupled
device), an MOS (metal oxide semiconductor) type sensor, a PD (photodiode), or the
like. In this case, this reflection light may be directly entered into the photodetector
16. Alternatively, this reflection light may be entered via an optical fiber, or the
like into this photodetector 16. Furthermore, while an image focusing system 15 such
as a lens, or the like is provided at a post stage of the beam separator 12, the reflection
light may be focused via this image focusing system 15 into the photodetector 16.
[0019] In this case, generally speaking, a Bragg grating portion may be easily manufactured,
while sensitivities of this Bragg grating portion may be made high. However, Bragg
gratings, which are commercially available, cannot be directly employed as high-sensitive
sensors to be used in ultrasonic diagnosing fields. Ultrasonic sensors with employment
of fiber Bragg gratings are described in, for instance, the document "Underwater Acoustic
Sensor with Fiber Bragg Grating" written by TAKAHASHI et. al., of National Defense
Academy in Japan, OPTICAL REVIEW vol. 4, No. 6, pages 691 to 694, in 1997. This document
clearly describes that the fiber Bragg grating may achieve certain available sensitivities
with respect to such ultrasonic waves within the lower frequency range of approximately
20kHz. However, this document never describes ultrasonic waves within frequency ranges
of megahertz, which are normally utilized in ultrasonic diagnosing fields.
[0020] Under such a circumstance, Inventors of the present invention could confirm operations
of Bragg gratings which are commercially available with respect to ultrasonic waves
in frequency ranges higher than 20kHz, while these Bragg gratings were applied to
the ultrasonic receiving apparatus as shown in Fig. 1. As a result of this operation
confirmation, the following fact could be confirmed. That is, sufficiently high sensitivities
could not be achieved in such Bragg gratings with respect to ultrasonic waves entered
from an axial direction thereof. Also, while length of the Bragg grating portion was
changed, various operations of these Bragg grating portions having the different lengths
could be confirmed as follows: That is, in such a case that a length of a Bragg grating
portion was larger than approximately 3/4 of an ultrasonic wavelength "λ
s" in the Bragg grating portion, which is expressed by the below-mentioned formula
(3), the detected waveform was distorted on the lower frequency side, as compared
with the waveform of the actually received ultrasonic wave, and the sensitivity of
the sensor was lowered.

[0021] Now, this operation confirmation will be described in a more concrete manner.
[0022] First, while a length of a Bragg grating portion (sensor length) was changed, experimental
operations of comparing operations of Bragg gratings were carried out. In this experiment,
such ultrasonic waves having a frequency range of 3.5MHz generated by employing PZT
were applied to two sorts of Bragg grating portions having one sensor length of 3/4
λ
s, and also, another sensor length of 3/2 λ
s. In this case, waveforms of detection signals output from the above-described two
sorts of sensors are shown in Fig. 3A and Fig. 3B, respectively.
[0023] As indicated in Fig. 3A, in the case where the sensor length was 3/4 λ
s, amplitudes of the detection signals could be monitored in response to the applied
ultrasonic waves. To the contrary, as indicated in Fig. 3B, in the case where the
sensor length is 3/2 λ
s, substantially no change in amplitudes of the detection signals could be monitored.
As a consequence, the following fact could be revealed. That is, when the sensor length
is increased, the sensitivity of this sensor is considerably deteriorated.
[0024] Next, waveforms of detection signals output from Bragg gratings having different
sensor lengths while ultrasonic waves were applied to the Bragg gratings were simulated.
In this simulation, the following assumption was made, while 4 sorts of sensors having
sensor lengths of 1/2 λ
s, 3/4 λ
s, λ
s, and 3/2 λ
s were employed, and also, the ultrasonic waves were applied to these sensors for two
time period corresponding to two wavelength of sine wave. Also, another assumption
was made. That is, when the ultrasonic wave is applied to each sensor, stress distribution
corresponding to intensity of the ultrasonic wave is produced along the sensor length
direction, such signal intensity which is directly proportional to averaged stress
occurred within each sensor is obtained. The result of this simulation is shown in
Fig. 4.
[0025] Fig. 4 graphically shows an ideal waveform of detection signal which is identical
to the applied ultrasonic wave having a frequency of 3.5MHz for two time period in
the case where the sensor length is equal to (1/∞) λ
s, namely infinitesimal. In contrast to this ideal waveform, waveforms of detection
signals produced in the case where other sensor lengths shown in Fig. 4 are employed
are given as follows: That is, phases of the detection signals are delayed, and amplitudes
of the detection signals are decreased in accordance with such a fact that the sensor
lengths are increased. Further, when the sensor length is equal to λ
s, an amplitude of the detection signal continuously becomes zero after detected portion
of 1/2 wavelength. This may be because a state continues in which an averaged value
of the amplitudes of the detection signal portions existing in the sensor is zero
when the ultrasonic wave propagates through the sensor. In addition, when the sensor
length is equal to 3/2 λ
s, the amplitude of the ultrasonic waves are less than the above-mentioned case, and
a waveform of the detection signal has not a similar figure to that of the received
ultrasonic wave. Thus, when a sensor length is increased, performance of the sensor
is deteriorated. As a result, in order to faithfully represent waveforms of ultrasonic
waves containing phases and amplitudes by way of detection signals output from the
sensors, the sensor lengths must be shorted up infinitely. However, if a detection
signal having an amplitude which is approximately as large as that of the detection
signal in the case where the sensor length is equal to 3/4 λ
s as shown in Fig. 4 can be detected, by obtaining the phase distortion of the detection
signal in advance, it is possible to represent the detection waveform of the ultrasonic
wave by using the phase distortion. In addition, since in general-purpose ultrasonic
receiving apparatus, a detection signal is processed by phase matching process operation
and lowpass filter process operations and is converted into ultrasonic images, the
received waveform of the ultrasonic wave is not necessarily represented as a waveform
of the detection signal when the detection signal is converted into ultrasonic images.
For example, when an amplitude of distortion is approximately equal to that of the
detection signal in the case where the sensor length is equal to 3/4 λ
s as shown in Fig. 4, practically no problem exists even if the waveform of the received
ultrasonic wave can not be represented. Therefore, if the sensor length is not larger
than 3/4 λ
s, such a detection signal required to obtain ultrasonic images can be acquired.
[0026] As explained above, in the experimental operations and simulations, when the sensor
lengths are long, the waveform distortions of the detection signals are monitored.
The reason why such waveform distortions are monitored may be conceived as follows:
In this case, referring now to Fig. 5, in such a case where the length of the Bragg
grating portion is not less than the wavelength of the ultrasonic wave propagated
through the Bragg grating portion, such a portion where expansion/compression of phases
are inverted is produced in the Bragg grating portion in a stage where the ultrasonic
waves are propagated through the Bragg grating portion. As a consequence, as viewed
in the entire sensor portion, such a phenomenon that the expansion/compression of
phases are offset may be conceived as this reason.
[0027] To avoid an occurrence of such a phenomenon, the length of the Bragg grating portion
should be shorter than the wavelength of the ultrasonic wave in the Bragg grating
portion, preferably not larger than approximately 3/4 thereof or more preferably on
the order of 1/2 thereof. For example, in the case where a frequency of ultrasonic
waves to be detected is selected to be 3.5MHz, and also, a sound velocity of the ultrasonic
waves within the material of the Bragg grating portion is equal to 5500m/s, a wavelength
"λ
s" of the ultrasonic waves propagated through the Bragg grating portion may be calculated
as follows:

As a consequence, an upper limit length of the Bragg grating portion may be calculated
as follows:

As a result, assuming now that the length of the Bragg grating portion is shorter
than, or equal to 1178.5µm, for example, is selected to be approximately 1mm, the
adverse influence caused by the above-described phenomenon such that the expansion/compression
of phases are inverted within the Bragg grating portion can be suppressed. Accordingly,
the sensor of the Bragg grating portion can have high sensitivities with respect to
the ultrasonic waves propagated along, especially, the axial direction of this Bragg
grating portion.
[0028] Fig. 6 illustratively shows one modification as to the ultrasonic receiving apparatus
according to this first embodiment. This modified ultrasonic receiving apparatus is
arranged in such a manner that at least one of an optical amplifier 1 and another
optical amplifier 2 is additionally provided with the first ultrasonic receiving apparatus
shown in Fig. 1. While the optical amplifier 1 is arranged between the light source
11 and the beam separator 12, this optical amplifier 1 amplifies light entered from
the light source 11, and then, projects the amplified light to the beam separator
12. On the other hand, while the optical amplifier 2 is arranged between this beam
separator 12 and the image focusing system 15 such as lens, this optical amplifier
2 amplifies light entered from the beam separator 12, and then, projects the amplified
light to the image focusing system 15. Alternatively, when the image focusing system
15 is not employed, the optical amplifier 2 is arranged between the beam separator
12 and the photodetector 16, this optical amplifier 2 amplifies the light entered
from the beam separator 12, and then, projects the amplified light to the photodetector
16.
[0029] As these optical amplifiers, for example, such an optical fiber amplifier EDFA (Er-Doped
Optical Fiber Amplifier) into which erbium (Er) has been doped is used. This EDFA
may increase intensity of light by approximately 1 digit up to 2 digits.
[0030] In the case where such an optical amplifier is arranged between the light source
11 and the optical fiber 13, the intensity of the incident light which is entered
into the ultrasonic detecting element 17 is amplified. Also, in the case where such
an optical amplifier is arranged between the optical fiber 13 and the photodetector
16, the intensity of the incident light which is entered into the ultrasonic detecting
element 17 is not changed, but the intensity of the reflection light which is entered
into the photodetector 16 is amplified. In this case, the intensity change of the
reflection light which is modulated by the received ultrasonic waves is similarly
amplified.
[0031] In any cases, since the intensity is amplified under conditions of the light, the
light amount of the reflection light which is entered into the photodetector 16 is
increased. As a consequence, the adverse influences caused by the electric noise in
the photodetector 16 can be reduced, and thus, the S/N ratio of the ultrasonic receiving
apparatus can be improved. Furthermore, when both of the above-explained cases are
combined with each other, the S/N ratio of the ultrasonic receiving apparatus may
be furthermore improved.
[0032] Referring now to Fig. 7, another modification of the ultrasonic receiving apparatus
according to the first embodiment will be explained. This modified ultrasonic receiving
apparatus shown in Fig. 7 is featured by that the light source of the first ultrasonic
receiving apparatus indicated in Fig. 1 is changed. That is, in the modification example
of Fig. 7, light emitted from a broadband light source is filtered by employing a
narrowband filter so as to obtain narrowband light.
[0033] As the broadband light source, for instance, an ASE (Amplified Spontaneous Emission)
light source capable of emitting amplified spontaneous emission light, and a broadband
fiber light source may be employed. In Fig. 7, an ASE light source 9 is used as this
broadband light source. The ASE light source 9 is manufactured in such a manner that
a construction of a broadband optical fiber amplifier is modified, by which amplified
spontaneous emission light can be produced. The broadband optical fiber amplifier
is described more in detail in, for example, "BROADBAND OPTICAL FIBER AMPLIFIERS"
written by H. OGOSHI, The Journal of The Institute of Electronics, Information and
Communication Engineers Vol. 82, No. 7, pages 718 to 724, July in 1999.
[0034] As shown in Fig. 8, the ASE light source 9 includes an optical fiber 94 for amplifying
light. While a lens 91 is mounted on one edge portion of this optical amplifying fiber
94, a Bragg grating portion 92 for reflecting excitation light is formed at the other
edge portion thereof. A laser oscillator 93 is arranged as an excitation light source
on the left side of the lens 91. The laser light generated from the laser oscillator
93 is entered via the lens 91 to this optical amplifying fiber 94 so as to be amplified.
A portion of this amplified laser light passes through the Bragg grating portion 92
as spontaneous emission light.
[0035] Referring back to Fig. 7, the light (laser light) emitted from the ASE light source
9 is entered into the beam separator 10. This beam separator 10 may cause the light
entered from a first direction to pass therethrough along a second direction, and
also may cause reflection light returned from the second direction to pass therethrough
along the third direction which is different from the first direction. In Fig. 7,
a half mirror is employed as the beam separator 10. Alternatively, an optical circulator
and/or a polarization beam splitter may be employed as this beam separator 10.
[0036] The light which has been emitted from the ASE light source 9 and then passes through
the beam separator 10 is entered into an optical fiber 20. A narrowband filter 19
constructed of a Bragg grating portion is provided at a tip portion of the optical
fiber 20. The light entered into the optical fiber 20 is reflected by the Bragg grating
portion of the narrowband filter 19, and is again entered into the beam separator
10. The spontaneous emission light produced from the ASE light source 9 passes through
this narrowband filter 19, so that the pass-band of this spontaneous emission light
is narrowed.
[0037] The light reflected by the narrowband filter 19 is again entered into the beam separator
10, so that the travel path of this reflected light is changed, and then, the reflection
light is entered into the beam separator 12. The light which has passed through this
beam separator 12 is entered into the optical fiber 13, so that this entered light
is modulated by the ultrasonic detecting element 17 provided on the tip portion of
this optical fiber 13.
[0038] In this case, as to the Bragg grating portion, the center wavelength of the reflection
light is changed by such a ratio of 0.01nm/°C in response to a change in temperatures.
As a result, when a light source capable of producing laser light having a single
wavelength is employed, the following problem may occur. That is, the sensitivity
of the ultrasonic detecting element 17 which is constructed of the Bragg grating portion
is largely changed in response to a change in temperatures.
[0039] However, as represented in Fig. 7, when the spontaneous emission light generated
from the ASE light source 9 is filtered by using the narrowband filter 19 so as to
obtain the narrowband light, such a range approximated to the laser light having the
single wavelength may be secured, and also, the change in the sensitivities of the
ultrasonic receiving apparatus caused by the change in the temperatures can be reduced.
[0040] In other words, thermal coupling effects may be achieved by employing the following
methods. That is, while both the narrowband filter 19 and the ultrasonic detecting
element 17 are manufactured by using the same material, for example, the narrowband
filter 19 is coupled to the ultrasonic detecting element 17 by employing such a material
having a high thermal conductivity. Alternatively, the narrowband filter 19 is physically
located in proximity to the ultrasonic detecting element 17. Furthermore, a heat pipe
may be arranged around both the narrowband filter 19 and the ultrasonic detecting
elment 17.
[0041] As a result, since the temperature at the Bragg grating portion of the narrowband
filter 19 can become substantially same as the temperature at the Bragg grating portion
of the ultrasonic detecting element 17, even when the reflection characteristic of
the ultrasonic detecting element 17 is shifted due to the temperature, the wavelength
of the light entered into the ultrasonic detecting element 17 is similarly shifted,
so that the change in the sensitivities of the ultrasonic receiving apparatus can
be reduced.
[0042] Referring now to Fig. 9 and Fig. 10, an ultrasonic receiving apparatus according
to a second embodiment of the present invention will be described. This second ultrasonic
receiving apparatus is featured by that the ultrasonic detecting element 17 employed
in the ultrasonic receiving apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present
invention is replaced by another ultrasonic detecting element (multi-layer film sensor)
30.
[0043] Fig. 9 is a diagram for illustratively representing a basic idea as to the ultrasonic
receiving apparatus according to this second embodiment. This second ultrasonic receiving
apparatus contains as an ultrasonic sensible unit, the ultrasonic detecting element
30 equipped with the Bragg grating structure. While this ultrasonic detecting element
30 contains a circular area having a diameter of approximately 2cm, or another diameter
larger than 2cm, the ultrasonic detecting element 30 may produce distortions by applying
thereto ultrasonic waves.
[0044] Fig. 10 illustratively indicates the structure of the ultrasonic detecting element
30 shown in Fig. 9 in an enlarging manner. The ultrasonic detecting element 30 contains
a board 31 and a multi-layer film 32, while the multi-layer film 32 is manufactured
by alternatively stacking two sorts of material layers having different refractive
indexes from each other on the board 31. In Fig. 10, both a material layer "C" having
a reflective index of "n
3", and another material layer "D" having another refractive index of "n
4" are shown. As the board 31, for example, optical glass and the like are employed,
for example, quartz glass (SiO
2) and BK7 (product name of SCHOTT Company).
[0045] As substances employed as the material layer C and the material layer D, it is preferable
to combine such materials with each other, the refractive indexes of which are different
from each other by not less than 10%. In other words, such substances are selected
which can satisfy a relationship of n
3 × 1.1 ≤ n
4 in the case where n
3 < n
4. This substance selection reason is to obtain high reflectance at a boundary surface
between the material layer C and the material layer D. Also, the material layers C
and D may be preferably made of substances which may be easily expanded/compressed.
This material selection is to increase the distortion amount occurred when the ultrasonic
waves are applied to these material layers, and also to eventually increase the system
sensitivity. As combination examples of substances capable of satisfying such a condition,
SiO
2 may be combined with a titanium oxide (Ti
2O
3), and SiO
2 may be combined with a tantalum oxide (Ta
2O
5). For instance, in the former combination case, the refractive index of SiO
2 with respect to laser light having a wavelength of 1520nm is nearly equal to 1.45,
whereas the refractive index of Ti
2O
3 is nearly equal to 2.0 with respect to this laser light. Accordingly, this may sufficiently
satisfy the above-described condition, namely the refractive indexes are different
from each other by higher than, or equal to 10%.
[0046] A layer thickness (film thickness) of each of these material layers C and D is preferably
selected to be approximately 1/4 of a wavelength "λ" of light which is entered into
the ultrasonic detecting element 30. In this case, a film thickness implies an optical
distance which is expressed by a product defined by multiplying a refractive index
(n) of a material layer by a thickness (t) of the material layer. In this case, nt
= λ/4 constitutes the condition. As a result, while a pitch of a periodic structure
of the multi-layer film 32 is nearly equal to 1/2 of a wavelength of incident light,
this multi-layer film 32 may selectively reflect such a wavelength component capable
of satisfying the Bragg's reflection condition formula (2), and may penetrate therethrough
other wavelength components.
[0047] Alternatively, while both the material layers C each having the layer thickness of
λ/4 and the material layers D each having the layer thickness of λ/4 are alternately
stacked, either such a material layer C having a layer thickness of λ/2 or such a
material layer D having a layer thickness of λ/2 may be occasionally stacked.
[0048] The above-described material layers "C" and "D" are formed in a multi-layer form
(for example, 100 layers of each of materials C/D) on the board 31 by way of the vacuum
vapor deposition method, or the sputtering method or the like.
[0049] In this case, similar to the first embodiment, also in this second ultrasonic receiving
apparatus, the length of the ultrasonic sensible portion, namely, the thickness of
the multi-layer film 32 is preferably selected to not larger than 3/4 of a wavelength
of propagated ultrasonic waves in such a manner that phases of expansions/compressions
are made substantially coincident to each other within the sensor.
[0050] Such an ultrasonic detecting element was manufactured by using SiO
2 as the board, and both SiO
2 and Ti
2O
3 as the material layers. A total layer number of this multi-layer film 32 was determined
as follows. That is, 100 layers of each of these materials were employed, and thus,
200 layers of these materials were stacked in total. When a simulation was carried
out under such a condition that laser light was entered into this ultrasonic detecting
element, the below-mentioned results could be obtained. That is, as to an inclination
of reflectance with respect to a change contained in wavelengths of incident laser
light was 2.8dB/0.01nm at the reflectance of 25%.
[0051] As explained above, since the total layer number of this multi-layer film 32 is increased,
the reflectance is increased, and also, the reflectance represents such a steep change
with respect to the change contained in the wavelengths, so that the sensitivity of
the ultrasonic sensor can be increased.
[0052] Referring again to Fig. 9, the laser light emitted from the light source 11 passes
through the beam separator 12, and then, is entered into the multi-layer film 32 of
the ultrasonic detecting element 30. In this case, the incident laser light may be
alternatively enlarged by using a beam expander 33 before this incident laser has
passed through the beam separator 12.
[0053] On the other hand, when ultrasonic waves are propagated through the ultrasonic detecting
element 30, this ultrasonic detecting element 30 is distorted in connection with the
propagation of the ultrasonic waves, so that the pitch of the periodic structures
of the multi-layer film 32 is changed. Since the wavelength component of the light
which is selectively reflected in connection with this pitch variation is also changed,
a change contained in the intensity of the reflection light in response to strengths
of the ultrasonic waves can be monitored. In this case, since the ultrasonic detecting
element 30 receives the ultrasonic waves by way of the face thereof, two-dimensional
strength distribution information as to the ultrasonic waves can be acquired.
[0054] The light reflected from the ultrasonic detecting element 30 is reflected by the
beam separator 12, and then, is entered into the photodetector 34. While the photodetector
34 is such a two-dimensional array detector which is constituted by a plurality of
CCDs, or a plurality of PDs, the reflection light is detected for respective pixels.
At this time, the reflection light may be directly entered into the photodetector
34, or may be entered via an optical fiber or the like to this photodetector 34. Alternatively,
while the image focusing system 15 such as a lens is provided at a post stage of the
beam separator 12, the reflection light may be focused onto the photodetector 34 via
this image focusing system 15.
[0055] The ultrasonic receiving apparatus according to this second embodiment may be apparently
modified. That is, similar to the modification as indicated in Fig. 6, the optical
amplifiers 1 and 2 may be further employed. Alternatively, similar to another modification
as shown in Fig. 7, the broadband light source may be employed for the narrowband
purpose. In the latter-mentioned modification, while the ultrasonic detecting element
in this second embodiment is employed as the Bragg grating portion of the narrowband
filter 19, this ultrasonic detecting element may be thermally coupled to such an ultrasonic
detecting element capable of detecting the ultrasonic waves.
[0056] In accordance with this second embodiment, since the multilayer film sensor is employed,
the ultrasonic waves can be detected in the two-dimensional manner. The cost of such
a multi-layer film sensor can be made lower than the cost of such a sensor that fiber
Bragg gratings are manufactured in an array form. As a result, the resulting cost
required when the two-dimensional sensor is manufactured can be reduced. Also, the
multi-layer film is manufactured one layer by one layer by way of the vacuum vapor
deposition, or the sputtering method or the like, so that such material members having
a large difference between refractive indexes thereof can be selected. As a consequence,
the inclination of the reflectance can be increased, and therefore, the sensitivity
of this second ultrasonic receiving apparatus can be improved.
[0057] Referring now to Fig. 11, an ultrasonic receiving apparatus according to a third
embodiment of the present invention will be described. This third ultrasonic receiving
apparatus is featured by that the ultrasonic detecting element 17 employed in the
ultrasonic receiving apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present invention
is replaced by another ultrasonic detecting element 18.
[0058] As shown in Fig. 11, the ultrasonic detecting element 18 is provided at a tip portion
of an optical fiber 13. This ultrasonic detecting element 18 contains both a Bragg
grating portion 17 and a Fabry-Perot resonator 14. In other words, the Bragg grating
portion 17 is formed at the tip portion of the optical fiber 13, and furthermore,
the Fabry-Perot resonator 14 containing a half mirror (right side as viewed in Fig.
11) and a total reflection mirror (left side as viewed in Fig. 11) is formed at a
portion in front of the above-explained tip portion. Also, in this third embodiment,
in order that an adverse influence caused by expansions/compressions of phases is
suppressed, it is assumed that a length of an ultrasonic sensible portion containing
both the Bragg grating portion 17 and the Fabry-perot resonator 14 may be selected
to not to be larger than 3/4 of a wavelength of ultrasonic waves propagated through
this ultrasonic sensible portion, preferably, selected to be approximately 1/2 of
this wavelength.
[0059] Now, a Fabry-Perot resonator will be explained. That is, this Fabry-Perot resonator
is manufactured as follows. While a half mirror is formed on a tip portion of a single
mode optical fiber by vapor-depositing gold or the like, a cavity made of polyester
resin, or the like is formed at a tip portion of this half-mirror-forming portion.
Furthermore, a total reflection mirror is formed at a tip portion of this cavity-forming
portion by vapor-depositing gold or the like. The material member for forming this
cavity may receive geometrical displacement by applying ultrasonic waves to this material
member.
[0060] In the case where detection light is entered from the half mirror side into this
Fabry-Perot resonator and also ultrasonic waves are applied to this Fabry-Perot resonator
from the total reflection mirror side, since the optical path length of the cavity
is changed based upon sound-pressure changes of the ultrasonic waves, intensity of
light which is reflected by the Fabry-Perot resonator is changed. As a result, since
this light intensity change is converted, intensity of the ultrasonic waves can be
measured. This Fabry-Perot resonator owns such a feature that since the length of
the sensor is short, resolution of this sensor along the axial direction thereof may
become high.
[0061] When such a Fabry-Perot resonator 14 is employed to be combined with the Bragg grating
portion 17, the light which is not reflected by this Bragg grating portion 17 can
be reflected by the Fabry-Perot resonator 14.
[0062] As previously described in detail, according to the present invention, since the
length of the ultrasonic sensible portion is limited on the basis of the wavelength
of the ultrasonic waves propagated through this ultrasonic sensible portion, such
an ultrasonic receiving apparatus having the higher sensitivity with respect to, especially,
the ultrasonic waves propagated along the axial direction of this ultrasonic sensible
portion can be realized, while suppressing the adverse influence caused by such a
phenomenon that the expansions/compressions of the phases are inverted in this ultrasonic
sensible portion. As a consequence, there are many possibilities that two-dimensional
sensors, ultrasonic diagnosing apparatus or the like by using such an ultrasonic receiving
apparatus may be realized.