TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a refiner force sensor for refiners used in the
pulp and paper industry, to a refining apparatus, and to a method of measuring forces
acting on a refiner bar in a refiner.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] Refiners are used to produce pulp from wood chips or to modify the mechanical properties
of wood fibres by repeatedly applying forces to the material processed by means of
bars mounted on two opposing surfaces that move relative to one another.
[0003] Refiners are commonly used in the pulp and paper industry to repeatedly subject wood
fibres or wood chips to stresses and strains. In the case where wood chips are processed,
the purpose is usually to separate wood fibres from one another to produce pulp that
can later be used to manufacture paper or composite wood products such as hardboard.
This process is generally conducted at high temperature and pressure in a steam environment,
because a large amount of steam is produced in the refiner from the heat dissipated
while processing the material. Coarse pulps produced in such a way can also be further
processed in a similar way to improve some of the properties of fibres. Examples of
this are the commonly used practice of subjecting pulp to a second stage of refining,
or to screening followed by reject refining. Low-consistency or flow-through refiners
are also used to process pulp slurries at consistencies up to approximately 5%. In
this case, the aim is generally to stress and strain wood fibres in order to improve
some of their properties.
[0004] A vast array of operating conditions are used in industrial refining systems, but
a number of design features are common to all refiners. Refiner discs are fitted with
plates having alternating patterns of bars and grooves. The bars of opposing plates
are separated by a small gap that can be adjusted, and at least one of the discs rotates.
Pulp travels through a refiner in the form of fibre agglomerates that are repeatedly
compressed and sheared between the bars of opposing plates as these travel past each
other. Hence, all refiners expend energy on fibres through a repeated application
of compression and shear forces acting on fibre agglomerates.
[0005] To quantify the effects that these forces have on the individual pulp fibres, some
measure of the degree of refining must be taken. Traditionally, this measure has simply
been the specific energy, which is the total energy put into the pulp per oven dry
mass of fibre. However, it is widely known that this parameter is not sufficient,
to fully characterize the refining action, since vastly different pulp properties
can be obtained at the same level of specific energy under different refining conditions.
Several methods have been proposed to use an additional parameter to characterize
the action of refiners. The additional parameter usually aims to quantify the severity
of bar impacts. This is achieved in different ways with each method, but the severity
of bar impacts is generally expressed as a specific energy per impact. However, energy-based
characterizations have shortcomings when it comes to identifying the mechanisms by
which refining occurs. Energy can be expended on pulp fibres in numerous ways and
the method of energy application - the forces - can have a substantial influence on
the final pulp properties. Giertz, H.W. ("A new way to look at the beating process",
Norske Skogindustri 18(7):239-248, 1964) suggested that different refining effects could be explained
by the relative magnitude of the forces applied. Similarly, Page, D.H. ("The beating
of chemical pulps - The action and the effects", In
Fundamentals of Papermaking: Transactions of the Fundamental Research Symposium held
at Cambridge, F. Bolam editor, Fundamental Research Committee, British Paper and Board Makers'
Association, Volume 1, pp. 1-38, 1989), has suggested that a complete understanding
of the refining process would require knowledge of the average stress-strain history
of individual fibres.
[0006] Early work on forces focused on measuring the pressure on refiner bar surfaces. Two
of these studies were in low-consistency applications (Goncharov, V.N., "Force factors
in a disk refiner and their effect on the . beating process", English translation,
Bum. Promst. 12(5):12-14, 1971; and Nordman, L., Levlin, J.-E., Makkonen, T., and Jokisalo, H.,
"Conditions in an LC-refiner as observed by physical measurements",
Paperija Puu 63(4): 169-180, 1981), while one was at high consistency (Atack, D., "Towards a theory
of refiner mechanical pulping",
Appita Journal 34(3):223-227, 1980). The harsh conditions that exist within the refining zone of
commercial refiners have proven too severe for standard pressure sensors. These generally
fail within a few minutes of operation in these conditions.
[0007] Despite the shortcomings of standard pressure sensors, a method has been proposed
by Karlström (International Patent Publication No. WO 97/38792) to use them, in conjunction
with temperature sensors, to regulate the operation of high-consistency chip refiners.
In the control scheme proposed, the mass flow rate of chips and the dilution water
flow rate to the refiner, as well as the pressure applied to regulate the gap between
refining discs, are adjusted in response to measured values of pressure and temperature
in the refining zone. The aim of the method is to control the temperature and the
pressure profile across the refining zone in order to maintain desired values of these
parameters. WO 97/38792 also claims a method to control specific pulp properties by
raising or lowering the temperature in the refining zone. In International Patent
Publication No. WO 98/48936, Karlstrom proposes an arrangement of such temperature
and pressure sensors for installation in a refiner. WO 97/38792 and WO 98/48936 relate
only to the chip refining process.
[0008] The pressure measured in the way prescribed by the above method is not due directly
to mechanical forces imposed on pulp in the refining zone. It is rather due to the
presence of steam produced as a result of the large amount of mechanical energy expended
in the refiner that is dissipated as heat. While the steam pressure depends on the
amount of energy dissipated locally in the refining zone, it is also strongly dependent
on the ease with which steam can escape the refiner along the radial direction.
[0009] U.S. Patent No. 5,747,707 of Johansson and Kjellqvist proposed the use of one or
more sensor bars in a refiner. The sensor bars are equipped with strain gauges to
measure the load at a number of points along their length. By mounting several strain
gauges at each point, the authors suggest that the stresses on a bar can be divided
into load components acting in different directions. The apparatus can also include
temperature gauges that can be used to compensate the measured stresses for thermal
expansion of the bar. In another embodiment, the apparatus includes means for controlling
refining in response to the load determined by the sensors.
[0010] A sensor bar with a design similar to the one described in the above U.S. patent
was used by Gradin et al. (Gradin, P.A., Johansson, O., Berg, J.-E., and Nystrom,
S., "Measurement of the power distribution in a single-disc refiner", J. Pulp Paper
Sci., 25(11):384-387, 1999) to measure the distribution of the expended power in the
refining zone of a single-disc refiner. The authors found that the power expended
per unit area was approximately constant over the radius of the refining zone. This
confirmed an earlier finding of Atack, D., and May, W.D. ("Mechanical reduction of
chips by double-disc refining", Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 64 (Conv. issue): T75-T83, T115,
1963). In order to improve the sensitivity of the sensor bar, the latter was manufactured
out of aluminum. This choice of material is inadequate for long-term operation in
an industrial refiner, since the sensor bar would wear much faster than the other
refiner bars made of hardened material.
[0011] International Patent Publication No. WO 00/78458, comprising priot art only under
the terms of Article 54(3) of European Patent Convention, describes another method
and apparatus for measuring stress forces in refiners. The measurement in this case
is performed accross a measuring surface constituting a part of a refering disc using
a measuring device comprising a single force sensor and a body connecting the sensor
with the measuring surface.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
[0012] According to the present invention there is provided a force sensor for measuring
force acting on a refiner bar of a refiner, and a method of measuring such forces,
as defined in the accompanying claims. There is also provided a refining apparatus
including such a force sensor.
[0013] In accordance with a broad aspect of an embodiment of the present invention there
is provided a force sensor for measuring force acting on a refiner bar of a refiner
for producing or processing wood pulp, said force sensor comprising: a sensor body
having a sensor head; and at least two sensor elements in force transmission contact
with and supporting the sensor body, wherein said sensor elements produce a signals
indicative of the magnitude of force acting on a refiner bar of a refiner for producing
or processing wood pulp.
[0014] In some embodiments, the refiner bar is on a refiner plate. The refiner plate comprises
a refining surface having refiner bars, and a non-refining surface opposed to the
refining surface. However, the invention is also applicable to refiners wherein refiner
bars are not on a refiner plate.
[0015] In some embodiments, the sensor head replaces a portion of the refiner bar. In other
embodiments, the sensor head replaces, all of the refiner bar. In such embodiments,
the sensor body is of the same material as the refiner bar, and the sensor head has
a profile matching that of the refiner bar.
[0016] The sensor body may be attached to the refining surface of the refiner plate. In
some embodiments the sensor body is adapted to fit into a recess in the refining surface
of the refiner plate. In other embodiments, the sensor body may be attached to the
non-refining surface of the refining plate. In yet other embodiments, the sensor body
may be adapted to fit into a recess in the non-refining surface of the refining plate.
[0017] In a preferred embodiment, the sensor body floats on the sensor elements. In some
embodiments the sensor body floats on the sensor elements such that the only link
between the sensor body and the refiner plate is through the sensor elements. In yet
other embodiments, the force sensor further comprises a holder, and the sensor body
floats on the sensor elements such that the only link between the sensor body and
at least one of the refiner plate and the holder is through the sensor elements.
[0018] In some embodiments the sensor elements are piezo electric, or piezo-ceramic.
[0019] In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of
measuring forces acting on a refiner bar of a refiner for producing or processing
wood pulp, the method comprising: providing a sensor body having a sensor head such
that the sensor head replaces all or a portion of the refiner bar disposing at least
two sensor elements in force transmission contact with and supporting sensor body;
refining wood particles or wood pulp in said refiner to produce wood pulp or refined
wood pulp, such that force is applied to the sensor head and a signal indicative of
the force is developed at said sensor elements; and evaluating the signal as a measure
of the force applied to the sensor body.
[0020] In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the refiner bar is on
a refiner plate, the refiner plate comprising a refining surface having refiner bars,
and a non-refining surface opposed to the refining surface. In such embodiments the
sensor body may be attached to the refining surface of the refiner plate, while in
other embodiments, the sensor body may be attached to the non-refining surface of
the refiner plate.
[0021] In some embodiments, the sensor body floats on the sensor elements, In other embodiments,
the sensor the sensor body floats on the sensor elements such that the only link between
the sensor body and the refiner plate is through the sensor elements.
[0022] In yet further embodiments, the method further comprises providing a holder for the
sensor body and sensor elements, wherein the sensor body floats on the sensor elements
such that the only link between the sensor body and at least one of the refiner plate
and the holder is through the sensor elements
.
[0023] In some embodiments the sensor elements are piezo electric, or piezo-ceramic. Preferably,
said measured force is at least one force selected from shear force and normal force.
[0024] In a further embodiment of the method of the invention, shear force and normal force
are measured, said measured forces being used to regulate the operation of a refiner
by manipulating one or more variables selected from material feed rate, pulp consistency,
refiner-motor load, inlet pressure, outlet pressure, plate gap, and rotational speed,
such that the ratio of the measured normal and shear forces are maintained constant
or within a predetermined range.
[0025] In yet another embodiment, said measured force is used to detect contact between
opposing discs in a refiner. Contact between opposing discs is corrected by retracting
an axially moveable plate of said refiner.
[0026] In the above embodiments, a single force sensor or an array of force sensors can
be employed.
[0027] In another particular embodiment, there is provided in a refining apparatus for wood
pulp having a sensing means to determine a parameter, the improvement wherein the
sensing means comprises a force sensor comprising at least two piezo-electric sensor
elements, suitably the piezo-electric sensor elements are a piezo ceramic sensor element.
[0028] In yet another particular embodiment, there is provided a refining apparatus comprising
at least one refining disc, refining bars on said refining disc and at least one sensor
member in at least one of said refining bars, the at least one sensor member being
in force transmission contact with and supported by at least two piezo-electric sensor
elements, in a specific embodiment the sensor member is of the same material as the
refining bar in which it is mounted, and the at least two sensor elements are a piezo
ceramic sensor elements. Suitably the sensor member has a sensor body and a sensor
head, and the sensor head may have a profile matching the profile of the at least
one refining bar, such at least one refining bar having an elongate length interrupted
by the sensor head. In specific embodiments the refining bars project from a first
refining face of the refining disc, and the refining disc has a second, non-refining
face opposed to the refining face, the refining disc having a cavity extending inwardly
of the second face, and the sensor body being mounted within the cavity.
[0029] In yet another particular or specific embodiment, a method of measuring forces on
the surface of refiner bars in a refiner for producing or processing wood pulp comprises:
providing at least one sensor member in at least one refining bar of the refiner,
the at least one sensor member being in force transmission contact with and supported
by at least two piezo-electric sensor elements, refining wood particles or wood pulp
in the refiner to produce wood pulp or refined wood pulp, such that forces are applied
to the sensor member and a reaction force is developed at the piezo-electric sensor
elements which develops an electric charge proportional to the reaction force, and
evaluating the electric charge as a measure of said forces applied to the at least
one sensor member, suitably the sensor elements are piezo ceramic sensor elements,
and the sensor member has a sensor body and a sensor head, the sensor head may have,
a profile matching the profile of the at least one refining bar, and the at least
one refining bar has an elongate length interrupted by the sensor head.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0030] Embodiments of the invention will be described, by way of example, with reference
to the drawings, wherein:
Fig. 1 shows a cross section of a refiner force sensor according to an embodiment
of the invention;
Fig. 2 shows the embodiment of Fig. 1 in greater detail;
Figs. 3A and 3B are exploded views of the embodiment shown in Fig. 2;
Figs. 4, 5, and 6 show cross sections of alternative embodiments of a refiner force
sensor according the invention;
Fig. 7 shows a sensor body and piezo electric elements according to another embodiment
of the invention;
Figs. 8 to 15 show cross sections of alternative embodiments of a refiner force sensor
according the invention;
Fig. 16 is an exploded view of the embodiment shown in Fig. 15;
Figs. 17A, 17B, 18A, and 18B are graphs showing normal and shear forces measured in
a refiner using a force sensor according to the embodiment of Fig. 2;
Fig. 19 is a block diagram of a system used to measure forces within a single disc
refiner; and
Fig. 20 is a block diagram of a system used to measure forces within a double disc
refiner.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION AND DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS WITH REFERENCE
TO THE DRAWINGS
[0031] The present invention relates to a force sensor for measuring forces acting on a
refiner bar in an operating refiner. A refiner force sensor according to the present
invention can be used in any type of mechanical refiner used to apply force to wood
pulp or wood chips. Examples of such refiners are chip refiners and low-consistency
pulp refiners. These can be, for example, single disc, double disc, or conical disc
refiners. A single force sensor, or an array of force sensors, can be used for various
applications, examples of which are described herein, to control or monitor different
aspects of the refining process.
[0032] The invention will be described primarily with respect to single and double disc
refiners, the general structure of such refiners being well known. For example, a
typical refiner is described in U.S. Patent No. 5,747,707 to Johansson
et al., which consists of a pair of relatively rotatable refining discs having radial refiner
bars extending along at least part of the refining gap between the discs. The teachings
of all cited patents and publications are incorporated herein by reference in their
entirety.
[0033] The design of the present invention includes several improvements over the prior
devices and methods. For example, the use of a piezo electric sensor element, (e.g.,
a piezo-ceramic sensor element), results in a force sensor with high output voltage,
less sensitivity to electrical noise, and greater dynamic range, relative to previous
designs such as that of Johansson
et al. in U.S. Patent No. 5,747,707, in which strain gauges were employed as sensor elements.
Further, the design proposed in U.S. Patent No. 5,747,707 is impractical for several
reasons. For instance, there must be sufficient deformation of the refiner bar associated
with the sensor element to obtain a reliable signal from the sensor element. At the
same time, the refiner bar associated with the sensor element must have very similar
mechanical properties to other refiner bars on the refiner plate. Such deformation
is achieved through use of appropriate material and design of the refiner bar. If
the refiner bar is too rigid, the deformations involved are too small to be measured
reliably when strain gauges are used as sensor elements. An analysis conducted by
certain of the present inventors has shown that a sensor design based on strain gauges
and using steel as refiner bar material is indeed impractical from this standpoint.
[0034] To overcome problems of the design proposed in U.S. Patent No. 5,747,707, the refiner
bar can be made more compliant by using a material with a lower elastic modulus, as
was done by Gradin
et al. (above), or by modifying the shape or dimensions of some components of the refiner
bar. However, deformation at the tip of the refiner bar must remain small relative
to the distance between the bars on the opposing refiner plate, otherwise the forces
measured at the sensor bar will not be representative of the true forces between refiner
bars. Also, the use of different material for the refiner bar introduces errors because
such different material has different physical properties (e.g., hardness, wear resistance,
thermal expansion coefficient) relative to the material used for other refiner bars
on the refiner plates. Further, increasing the compliance of the refiner bar might
have a negative side effect of reducing the first resonant frequency of the force
sensor. As discussed below, this resonant frequency must be much higher than the bar
passing frequency in the refiner, otherwise vibrations of the refiner bar will affect
the measured forces. The inventors has also shown that it is in practice impossible
to reconcile all these requirements with a design based on strain gauges as sensing
element.
Sensor description
[0035] In accordance with a broad aspect of the present invention there is provided a force
sensor for measuring forces on a refiner bar of a refiner, such as a refiner used
for producing and/or processing wood pulp. A force sensor according to the invention
comprises a sensor body having a sensor head, and two or more sensor elements in force
transmission contact with the sensor body. As described in detail below, the sensor
body and one or more sensor elements are attached to a refiner plate, such that the
sensor head replaces all or a portion of a refiner bar on the refining surface of
a refiner plate.
[0036] As used herein, the term "force transmission contact" is intended to mean contact
between the sensor body and sensor elements that facilitates transmission of any force
received by the sensor body to the sensor elements. Preferably, force transmission
contact provides transmission of forces to the sensor elements without any attenuation
or distortion of the properties of the forces (e.g., amplitude, frequency, and phase).
However, in most cases some attenuation or distortion is unavoidable.
[0037] As used herein, the term "sensor element" is intended to mean any, transducer that
can produce a signal (e.g., an electrical charge or an electrical signal such as voltage
or current) in response to loading (e.g., compression). An example of a sensor element
is a piezo electric element, such as a piezo-ceramic element While the invention is
described below primarily with respect to piezo electric elements, it is to be understood
that the invention is not limited thereto. Suitable piezo electric elements are available
from BM Hi-Tech/Sensor Technology Ltd., Collingwood, Ontario. Piezo electric elements
selected for relatively high Curie temperature (360°C), made of lead zirconate titanate
(ceramic, e.g., BM500), and measuring about 1 mm x 1 mm x 7 mm, are preferable. The
poling direction is normal to the long axis and one of the short axes. The electrodes
are located on opposed surfaces normal to the poling direction. Generally, a thin
wire is attached (
e.g., soldered) to each of the two electrodes of the piezo electric elements, and these
wires are connected to a charge amplifier, as discussed below. An alternative source
of piezo electric elements is Piezo Kinetics Incorporated, Bellefonte, PA. Piezo electric
elements made of PKI#502 which has a Curie temperature of 350°C, are suitable. Use
of at least two sensor elements will permit both shear and normal forces to be resolved.
[0038] The sensor elements are installed in the refiner force sensor such that forces to
be measured are applied across two opposed surfaces of the elements. In cases where
the electrodes of the piezo electric elements are also on the same opposed surfaces,
an insulating layer (i.e., a dielectric material such as mica, cellophane tape, Mylar
(trade-mark for a polyester film), paper) should be disposed between the opposed surfaces
and the sensor components that contact the opposed surfaces. Alternatively, the sensor
body and holder and/or refiner plate surfaces can be coated with a thin insulating
layer such as vapour-deposited alumina. Piezo electric elements are preferably installed
in the force sensor such that forces are applied normal to the poling direction of
the sensor elements. The poling direction of piezo electric elements in the embodiments
described herein is normal to the two opposed surfaces that contact the force sensor
components. However, use alternative orientation of poling direction and electrodes
with respect to surfaces that contact the sensor body and holder and/or refiner plate
are contemplated.
[0039] Forces imparted to the refiner bars of the refiner plate are received by the sensor
body via the sensor head, and transmitted to the sensor element(s). As mentioned above,
the sensor body is attached to a refiner plate such that the sensor head replaces
all or a portion of a refiner bar. Accordingly, the sensor head has a shape or profile
that corresponds substantially to that of a refiner bar. Further, the sensor head
and/or body is made of the same or similar material as that of a refiner bar, to ensure
consistency of mechanical properties (e.g., hardness, wear resistance, thermal expansion
coefficient, etc.) across the refiner bars and sensor bead.
[0040] The sensor assembly comprises the sensor body and two or more sensor elements. In
such embodiments the sensor assembly is clamped to a refiner plate with any suitable
fastener such as screws. In particular, the sensor elements are clamped between the
sensor body and the refiner plate. Such clamping can be achieved, for example, with
a screw that directly penetrates the sensor body.
[0041] In other embodiments the sensor assembly comprises the sensor body, two or more sensor
elements, and a holder. The sensor assembly is attached to a refiner plate via the
holder using any suitable fastener. Clamping of the sensor body in force transmission
contact with the sensor elements is achieved, for example, by screwing the sensor
body to the holder such that the sensor elements are clamped between the sensor body
and the holder. However, it is preferable that the sensor body is clamped to the holder
without directly screwing the sensor body to the holder. For example, the holder can
comprise two or more portions between which the sensor body and sensor elements are
clamped, the holder portions being clamped together with fasteners such as screws.
In such embodiments, the only physical/mechanical link between the sensor body and
the refiner plate and/or the holder is through the sensor elements, such that the
sensor body "floats" an the sensor elements (see, for example, the embodiments shown
in Figs. 2,4,11,14,15, and 16, below).
[0042] Clamping of the sensor elements between the sensor body and refiner plate and/or
holder compresses the sensor elements, advantageously providing a preload to the sensor
elements. The preload helps to ensure a stable signal (e.g., reduces noise) from the
sensor elements during operation of the force sensor. Further, clamping gives the
sensor assembly structural integrity and ensures that a change (e.g., an increase
or decrease) in loading does not result in loss of contact between the sensor body
and sensor element(s).
[0043] For optimal operation in a refiner, the force sensor assembly (i.e., the assembly
comprising the sensor body, sensor elements, holder, if present, and hardware such
as screws) should have a vibrational behaviour (frequency response) such that it has
a first resonant frequency which is much higher than the bar-passing frequency of
the bars in the refiner (that is, the frequency with which bars on one of the refiner
plates pass by the bars on the other plate). As used herein, the term "optimal operation"
is intended to mean operation that produces force data which can be used to resolve
the forces produced at a refiner bar during each bar passing. Depending upon factors
such as the design of the refiner, the design of the refining plates, and the position
of the plates, the bar passing frequency in a typical commercial refiner varies between
about 20 kHz and about 50 kHz. Whereas in theory the first resonant frequency of the
force sensor assembly should be as high as possible, relative to the bar passing frequency,
physical constraints limit how high the first resonant frequency can be. A first resonant
frequency that is about ten times (10X) the bar-passing frequency is expected to be
the upper limit for most force sensor designs, and such first resonant frequency is
expected to perform fully satisfactorily. On the other hand, a first resonant frequency
that is about 1.5 times (1.5X) the bar-passing frequency will produce usable data,
but will also produce some noise due to vibration of the sensor body. In general,
there are four design principles which can be followed to increase the first resonant
frequency:
- 1. Reduction of the mass of the sensor body;
- 2. Reduction of the distance from the sensor elements to the center of mass of the
sensor body;
- 3. Selection of a material from which the sensor body is manufactured which has a
higher ratio of elastic modulus (stiffness) to density (for example, carbon fiber/epoxy
composite has a much higher ratio of elastic modulus to density than steel);
- 4. Reduction of the compliance of the sensor elements (e.g., piezo electric) by reducing
their thickness to the minimum allowed by manufacturing and assembly constraints.
[0044] Theoretical procedures such as finite element analysis can be used to determine the
resonant frequency of force sensor assemblies. The theoretical values can be measured
and confirmed experimentally.
[0045] Various embodiments of a force sensor according to the present invention are described
below. Throughout Figs. 1 to 16, common reference numerals refer to the same or similar
components of the embodiments described.
[0046] With reference to the embodiment of Figs. 1 and 2, there is shown in cross section
a refiner plate 10 comprising a force sensor assembly 14. Refiner plate 10 has a refining
face 16, a non-refining face 18 opposed to face 16 and a cavity or recess 20 extending
inwardly of face 18. Refiner face 16 has a plurality of refiner bars 22.
[0047] Sensor assembly 14 comprises a sensor body 30 and four piezo electric sensor elements
26 disposed in a sensor holder 28. Sensor assembly 14 is disposed in recess 20.
[0048] Sensor body 30 has a sensor head 32; sensor head 32 has a profile which matches the
profile of the portion of the refiner bar into which it is inserted. That is, the
top and side faces of sensor head 32 are substantially flush with the adjacent top
and side faces of the refiner bar into which it is inserted. The sensor head 32 thus
replaces a short length (e.g., 5 mm) of the refiner bar in which it is inserted and
is preferably made of the same material, so that it has the same mechanical properties.
[0049] An adhesive filler 52 (e.g., a silicone adhesive) occupies the gap between sensor
body 30, refiner plate 10, and sensor holder 28, to prevent contamination of the sensor
elements 26 by water, steam, and/or pulp.
[0050] The piezo electric sensor elements 26 are disposed between sensor body 30 and sensor
holder 28. To facilitate assembly the piezo electric sensors can be bonded to the
sensor body, using an adhesive such as, for example, epoxy, however; bonding of the
sensors to the sensor body is otherwise unnecessary as clamping the sensor assembly
together holds the sensor elements in place. Four piezoelectric elements 26 are used
in the embodiment shown in Fig. 1, but designs incorporating two or more sensor elements
26 are understood to be part of the present invention.
[0051] As shown in greater detail in Fig. 2, the sensor holder 28 is made of two parts 28a,28b
held together by fasteners 65. By tightening the fasteners, a preload is applied to
the piezo electric sensor elements 26 to ensure that, during operation, the piezo
electric elements 26 are always in compression. In addition, this ensures that the
sensor elements 26 are in force transmission contact in the holder 28. The sensor
holder 28 is fastened within the recess 20 in the non-refining surface 18 of the refining
plate 10. with screws 60.
[0052] Using finite element analysis, the first natural frequency of the embodiment shown
in Fig. 2 was found to be 30kHz.
[0053] Figs. 3A and 3B are exploded views of a force sensor assembly such as the embodiment
shown in Figure 2. As shown, thin layers of insulating material 72 such as, for example,
mica, are disposed between each of the two opposed surfaces of the piezo electric
elements 26, and the surfaces of the holder 28a,28b with which they are in contact.
If necessary, the insulating layers can be bonded to the piezo electric elements 26
and/or the surfaces of the sensor body 30 and/or holder 28a,28b using a suitable adhesive.
The insulating layers 72 prevent electrical contact between electrodes on the surfaces
of the piezo electric elements 26 and the sensor body 30 and holder 28. The sensor
body 30 and piezo electric elements 26 are clamped between the two parts 28a, 28b
of the holder 28 with screws 65. Wires (not shown) from each of the piezo electric
elements 26 pass through an orifice 76 in the holder 28a.
[0054] The force sensor assembly is secured in a recess 20 in the non-refining surface 18
of the refiner plate 10 using screws 60. The recess 20 in the refiner plate 10, if
prepared after heat treatment of the refiner plate, can be prepared using any suitable
process, such as electro-discharge machining (EDM). Non-heat treated inserts 78 can
be pressed into holes prepared by EDM and these inserts can then be tapped to receive
the screws 60.
[0055] As shown in Fig. 3B, an opening 80 in a refiner bar 22a receives the sensor head
32 such that the sensor head 32 replaces a portion of refiner bar 22a, and the exposed
faces of sensor head 32 are flush with the adjacent faces of the refiner bar 22a.
[0056] The following alternative embodiments of the refiner force sensor take advantage
of the first and second of the above design principles, resulting in higher first
resonant frequencies than the embodiment of Fig. 2. Further increases in the first
resonant frequency of any of these embodiments can be achieved applying the third
and fourth design principles discussed above.
[0057] In the embodiment shown in Fig. 4, the sensor body 30 is T-shaped, as in the embodiments
of Figs. 1 to. 3B. Unlike those embodiments, however, the sensor holder 28 no longer
encompasses a portion of the sensor body 30, and instead has been reduced to a simple
plate. As discussed above, only two piezo electric elements are required to resolve
the shear and normal forces applied to the sensor head 32. Thus, in this and the previous
embodiments, two of the four sensor elements can optionally be replaced with inactive
elements (i.e., elements of the same or different material as the sensor elements,
having an effective compliance about the same as that of the sensor elements). For
example, in the present embodiment, the two elements 46 are such inactive elements.
A preload is applied to the piezo electric elements 26 by screws 64 which also secure
the sensor holder 28 in the recess 20 of the refiner plate 10. The inactive elements
46 have sufficient compliance that, when the sensor head 32 is subjected to normal
and shear forces, these forces are borne principally by the piezo elements 26. The
simplification of the sensor holder 28 facilitates reduced length and mass of the
sensor body 30, and thus the distance from the piezo elements 26 to the center of
mass of the sensor body 30. These modifications all contribute to a reduction in the
first resonant frequency of the force sensor assembly.
[0058] The embodiment shown in Fig. 5 is similar to that of Fig. 4 except that the inactive
components 46 are eliminated, and the sensor body 30 is captured by a screw 62, through
which a preload is applied to the piezo sensor elements 26. The screw is located on
the longitudinal axis of the sensor body 30 (i.e., aligned with the long axis of the
refiner bars 22). Screws 60 attach the force sensor assembly in the recess 20 of the
refiner plate 10, but do not apply any preload to the sensor elements 26. Some of
the shear and normal forces that are received by the sensor head 32 will be transmitted
to the sensor holder 28 via the screw 62 rather than via the piezo electric elements
26. It is, therefore, essential that the screw 62 be substantially more compliant
(i.e., less stiff) than the piezo elements 26 so that sufficient load is transmitted
through the piezo electric elements 26 to ensure that measurable signals are generated.
[0059] The embodiment shown in Fig. 6 is similar to that shown in Fig. 5 except that the
shoulder 34 of the sensor body 30 is flush with the surface of the refiner plate at
the base 24 of the grooves between refiner bars 22. This further reduces the length
and mass of the sensor body 30 which, in turn, reduces the distance from the piezo
elements 26 to the center of mass of the sensor body 30, resulting in a higher first
resonant frequency. However, this embodiment has the disadvantage that failure of
the screw 62 will cause the sensor body 30 to fall into the refining zone between
refiner plates, with substantial damage to the refiner. In the previous embodiments,
the sensor body 30 is captured in the refiner plate 10 to prevent movement of the
sensor body 30 into the refining zone in the event of failure.
[0060] With reference to Fig. 6, this embodiment can be modified by eliminating the holder
28 and the recess 20 in the non-refining surface 18 of the refiner plate 10. Instead,
a small recess is provided in the refining surface 16 to accept the sensor body 30
and piezo elements 26. An orifice through refiner plate 10 is provided to accept a
screw 62 for securing refiner body 30 in the recess in the refining surface 16. In
such modified embodiment, the sensor body 30 is held in position in the refining surface
16 of the refiner plate 10, without the need for a holder 28. However, such embodiment
has the same disadvantage as that mentioned above in respect of the embodiment of
Fig. 6.
[0061] Fig. 7 shows an embodiment of sensor body 30, with piezo elements 26, suitable for
use in a force sensor similar to that shown any of the previous embodiments. As can
be seen in Fig. 7, the sensor body 30 has been modified to accommodate the sensor
elements 26 at an angle relative to the surface of refiner plate 10. Corresponding
modification of the holder 28 and/or refiner plate 10 of the previous embodiments
would therefore be required to accommodate the present sensor body.
[0062] As noted above, piezo electric elements are more sensitive to loading which occurs
normal to their poling direction. As the poling direction of the piezo electric elements
27 is normal to the two opposed surfaces that contact the sensor components, the angled
orientation of the piezo electric elements 27 of this embodiment provides superior
resolution of a shear force applied to the sensor head 32.
[0063] In the embodiment shown in Fig. 8, the mass of the sensor body 30 has been reduced,
relative to that of the previous embodiments. The sensor body 30 is mounted on two
piezo electric elements 26 which are positioned at an angle with respect to the surface
of the refiner plate 10. As in the previous embodiment, this orientation of the piezo
electric elements 26 ensures superior resolution of a shear force applied to the sensor
head 32. The sensor body 30 is captured, and preload is applied to the piezo elements
26, with a screw 62 located centrally in the sensor body 30 and holder 28. The sensor
body 30 also incorporates tabs 40 which extend under the refining surface of the refiner
plate 10. The tabs 40 prevent the sensor body 30 from falling into the refining zone
in the event of failure of the screw 62.
[0064] In the embodiment shown in Fig. 9, the mass of the sensor body 30 has been further
reduced, with respect to the previous embodiment, by providing a holder 28 that replaces
a portion of a refiner bar. The sensor body 30 is mounted on two piezo electric elements
26 which, unlike previous embodiments, are located above the base of the grooves between
refiner bars 22 in the refiner plate 10. The sensor body 30 is captured, and preload
is applied to the piezo electric elements 26, by a screw 62 located centrally in sensor
body 30. The sensor body 30 also incorporates tabs 40 which extend under the upper
surface of the refiner plate 10. The tabs 40 prevent the sensor body 30 from falling
into the refining zone in the event of failure of the screw 62.
[0065] In the embodiment shown in Fig. 10, the sensor body 30 is supported laterally on
four piezo electric elements 26 and supported vertically on one piezo electric element
29. The holder 28 comprises a vertical extension 54 and a retaining plate 56. The
sensor body 30 and piezo electric elements 26 are clamped between the vertical extension
54 and retaining plate 56 with one or more screws 65, which also applies a preload
to the sensor elements.
[0066] The embodiment of Fig. 11 is similar to that shown in Fig. 10 except that the sensor
body 30 is supported laterally on two, rather than four piezo electric elements 26.
[0067] The embodiment of Fig. 12 is similar to that shown in Fig. 10 except that the four
piezo elements 26 for are positioned at an angle with respect to the central axis
of the sensor body 30, and the piezo electric element 29 at the base of the sensor
body 30 has been eliminated. The vertical extension 54 of the sensor holder 28 and
the retaining plate 56 have opposed wedge-like profiles. Screws 65 clamp the sensor
body 30 between the vertical extension 54 and the retaining plate 56, and apply preload
to the sensor elements 26. Also, when the clamping screws 65 are tightened, the wedge
profiles ensure that the sensor body 30 and piezo elements 26 are properly located
in both the vertical and horizontal directions.
[0068] The embodiment of Fig. 13 is similar to that shown in Fig.. 12, except that two of
the piezo electric elements 26 have been eliminated and the central span of the sensor
body 30 has been reduced to a thin web. Also, the sensor holder comprises two portions
28a, 28b. Upon clamping the sensor body 30 and piezo electric elements 26 between
the holder portions 28a, 28b, this web transfers preload to the upper portion of the
sensor body 30, and hence to the sensor elements 26, while being sufficiently flexible
that forces applied to the sensor head 32 are transmitted to the piezo electric elements
26.
[0069] In the embodiment of Fig. 14, which shows a refiner force sensor assembly only, the
sensor body 30 is triangular at its base. The sensor body 30 is supported on three
piezo electric elements 26. The sensor body 30 and piezo electric elements 26 are
captured in a triangular recess in the holder 28, which exists between the vertical
extension 54 of the holder 28 and the retaining plate 56. Preload is applied to the
sensor elements 26 laterally by one or more screws 65.
[0070] In the embodiment shown in Fig. 15, the sensor body 30 has a triangular base portion
similar to that shown in Fig. 14. Sensor holder 28 has a corresponding slotted recess
for accepting sensor body 28 and three piezo elements 26. Unlike the embodiment of
Fig. 14, the sensor holder 30 of this embodiment does not comprise a vertical extension
54 or retaining plate 56. Instead, set screw 70 and plate 58 are used to clamp the
sensor body 30 into the sensor holder 28, and to apply preload to sensor elements
26. That is, tightening set screw 70 forces plate 58 towards the sensor elements 26
and sensor body 30. Plate 58 is tabbed to prevent it from rotating when set screw
70 is turned. The holder 28 is fastened into the recess 20 in the refiner plate 10
with screws 64.
[0071] In the embodiments of Figs. 14 and 15, the piezo electric element 26 below the base
of the sensor body 30 can be replaced with an inactive element, as discussed above.
The inactive component should have sufficient compliance that, when the sensor head
32 is subjected to normal and shear forces, these forces are borne principally by
the remaining two piezo electric elements 26.
[0072] As mentioned above, in some embodiments (e.g., those shown in Figs. 2, 4, 11, 14,
15, and 16), the only physical/mechanical link between the sensor body and the refiner
plate and/or the holder is through the sensor elements, such that the sensor body
"floats" on the sensor elements. It is noted that in the embodiments of Figs. 10 and
12, such floating of the sensor body 30 can be achieved if the screw(s) 65. do not
contact the sensor body 30. That is, to achieve floating of the sensor body 30, the
orifice in sensor body 30 should be of sufficient diameter that screw 65 does not
contact sensor body 30.
Sensor Operation
[0073] With reference to the embodiments of Figs. 1 to 16, when normal and shear forces
are applied to the sensor head 32 , reaction forces are developed at each of the piezo
sensor element locations. An electric charge, proportional to the magnitude of the
reaction force, is developed by each piezo sensor element 26. The applied normal and
shear forces can be determined by measuring and processing the electric signals from
each of the piezo sensor elements 26 using appropriate signal conditioning equipment
and data analysis.
Working Example
[0074] A force sensor according to the embodiment of Fig. 2 was installed in a laboratory
refiner. The refiner had a diameter of 30 cm and operated at atmospheric pressure.
The refiner was fed with chemi-thermomechanical pulp at a consistency of approximately
20%. Figs. 17A and B show the normal and shear forces calculated using the signals
from two of the piezo-ceramic element sensors 26. In Fig. 17A, the refiner was running
at 1260 rpm, corresponding to a period of approximately 270 µs between bar passings
(a bar-passing frequency of about 3:70 kHz). In Fig. 17B the refiner was running at
a higher speed of 2594 rpm, corresponding to a bar-passing period of 131 µs (a bar-passing
frequency of about 7.63 kHz). From these results, it can be seen that normal and shear
forces related to individual bar crossings can be measured with a force sensor according
to the present invention
[0075] The piezo electric elements used in the initial testing above were found to have
poor dimensional control. As a result, piezo electric elements having superior dimensional
control (Piezo Kinetics Incorporated, Bellefonte, PA; PKI#502, Curie temperature 350°C)
were incorporated into the force sensor of Fig. 2. This improved tolerances during
assembly and provided a more uniform distribution of loading to the sensor elements.
In addition, the charge amplifiers used in initial testing, above, which were developed
in-house, were replaced with industrial quality charge amplifiers (Kistler Type 5010).
These two factors improved the quality of signal obtained from the sensor, as indicated
in Figures 18A and B.
[0076] In Fig. 18A, the refiner was running at 700 rpm, corresponding to a bar-passing frequency
of about 2.06 kHz. In Fig. 18B the refiner was running at a higher speed of 2600 rpm,
corresponding to a bar-passing frequency of about 7.64 kHz. From these results, it
can be seen that optimization of the force sensor provides excellent resolution of
normal and shear forces related to individual bar crossings.
Measurement System
[0077] With reference to Fig. 19, a refining system 200 comprises a single disc refiner
202, charge amplifiers 204, a data acquisition unit 206 and a computer or controller
208.
[0078] Single disc refiner 202 has a rotary disc 210 comprising refiner plates and a stationary
disc 212 comprising refiner plates and force sensors 214, according to the present
invention, such as the embodiments shown in Figs. 1 to 15. Each force sensor 214 comprises
one or more piezo electric sensor elements as illustrated in the above embodiments
.
[0079] Refiner 202 has a shaft 216 for rotating disc 210 and a feed inlet 218 for wood chips
or wood pulp.
[0080] Fig. 19 thus shows the various components of a system used to measure forces within
a refiner. The refiner illustrated in Fig. 19 is a single-rotating disc refiner, commonly
referred to as a single-disc refiner. Four force sensors are illustrated in Fig. 19,
but any number can be used depending on the application. Each piezo electric element
of each force sensor is connected to a charge amplifier. The charge amplifiers are
connected to the data acquisition unit. In the embodiment shown, the latter can be
a digital oscilloscope, analogue to digital converter, or any other means of sampling
and digitizing the signals from the charge amplifiers. However, analogue techniques
can also be employed to process the force sensor signal(s). The data acquisition unit
is connected to the computer via a digital interface, so that the measured data can
be transferred for processing to determine the magnitude of the forces on refiner
bars of the stationary disc.
[0081] Fig. 20 shows a refining system 300 comprising a refiner 302 having a pair of rotating
discs 310 and 312, charge amplifiers 304, a data acquisition unit 306 and a computer
or controller 308.
[0082] Refiner disc 312 comprises refiner plates and a plurality of sensors 314 such as
illustrated in the above embodiments. Refiner 302 comprises a shaft 316 for rotating
discs 310 and 312, and a feed inlet 318 for wood chips or wood pulp.
[0083] A slip ring unit 319 provides connection between the sensors 314 and the charge amplifiers
304.
[0084] Thus Fig. 20 illustrates an arrangement for a case where the forces on refiner bars
are measured on a rotating disc, such as would be the case in a refiner where both
discs are rotating (e.g., a double-disc refiner). In this case, wires from the force
sensors are brought through the shaft of the refiner to a slip-ring unit. This unit
allows the transfer of electrical signals from a rotating part to a non-rotating part,
or vice-versa. The rest of the measurement system is similar to the one described
in Fig. 19. In a variation of the system illustrated in Fig. 20, the charge amplifiers
are mounted on the rotating shaft of the refiner, and the amplified signals are fed
to the data acquisition unit through the slip-ring unit. In the latter case, the slip-ring
unit can also be eliminated by transferring the amplified signals using a non-contact
transmitter-receiver system.
Applications
[0085] A number of applications have been identified for the present invention and are briefly
described hereinafter. Any of these applications may require a single force sensor
or an array of force sensors at a number of locations within the refining zone of
a refiner. Except where otherwise specified, these applications refer both to refining
of wood chips or wood fragments for the production of pulp using mechanical means
or the use of a refiner to modify some properties of wood fibres or pulp.
a) A single force sensor, or an array of force sensors, can be used to measure the
magnitude of the normal force, acting perpendicular to the plane of the refiner bar
surfaces, and the shear force, acting in the plane of the refiner bar surfaces. The
relative magnitude of the normal and shear forces affects the action of the refiner
on the material processed and can be adjusted by changing the feed rate of material
to the refiner, the solids content of the material fed, the plate gap in the refiner,
or the rotational speed of the refiner. By manipulating the refiner operating conditions
so as to maintain a constant ratio between the shear and the normal forces in response
to changes caused by process upsets, a more uniform refining action can be maintained.
b) A single force sensor, or an array of force sensors, can be used to detect contact
between two opposing refiner plates (plate clash). Specific features of the force
signals can be monitored to detect such contact, and corrective action can be taken
to preserve the integrity of the refiner plates and avoid premature wear, such as,
for example, retracting the axially moveable plate of the refiner.
c) The magnitude of the measured forces in a refiner depends, among other things,
on the amount of material present between the refiner bars and the distance between
the face of the intersecting bars (plate gap). When the mass flow rate of material
fed to a refiner changes, due for example to process upsets or non-uniform quality
of the feed material, the amount of material present between refiner bars can also
change. A single force sensor, or an array of force sensors, in conjunction with a
suitable means to measure plate gap in the refiner, can be used to detect such changes
and take corrective action.
d) In refiners having multiple co-axial refining zones, such as for example, twin
refiners, conical disc refiners, multidisc refiners, Duoflo refiners, and the like,
an arrangement of sensors can be used to measure the relative magnitude of forces
between different refining zones. The sensors can be used as part of a control system
to regulate the flow of material or the plate gap in each refining zone in order to
maintain predetermined optimal operating conditions.
Equivalents
[0086] Those skilled in the art will recognize variants of the embodiments described herein.
Such variants are within the scope of the present invention and are covered by the
appended claims.
1. A force sensor (14) for measuring force acting on a refiner bar (22) of a refiner
for producing or processing wood pulp, said force sensor (14) comprising:
a sensor body (30) having a sensor head (32); and
at least two sensor elements (26) in force transmission contact with and supports
the sensor body (30),
wherein said at least two sensor elements (26) produce a signals indicative of the
magnitude of force acting on a refiner bar (22) of a refiner for producing or processing
wood pulp.
2. The force sensor (14) of claim 1, wherein the refiner bar (22) is on a refiner plate
(10).
3. The force sensor (14) of claim 2, wherein the refiner plate (10) comprises a refining
surface (16) having refiner bars (22), and a non-refining surface (18) opposed to
the refining surface (16).
4. The force sensor (14) of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the sensor head (32) is adapted
to replace a portion of the refiner bar (22).
5. The force sensor (14) of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the sensor head is adapted to replace
an of the refiner bar (22).
6. The force sensor (14) of any preceding claim, wherein the sensor body (30) is of the
same material as the refiner bar (22).
7. The force sensor (14) of any preceding claim, wherein the sensor head (32) has a profile
matching that of the refiner bar (22).
8. The force sensor (14) of claim 3, wherein the sensor body (30) is attached to the
refining surface (16) of the refiner plate (10).
9. The force sensor (14) of claim 3, wherein the sensor body (30) is adapted to fit into
a recess in the refining surface (16) of the refiner plate (10).
10. The force sensor (14) of claim 3, wherein the sensor body (30) attached to the non-refining
surface (16) of the refining plate (10).
11. The force sensor (14) of claim 3, wherein the sensor body (30) is adapted to fit into
a recess (20) in the non-refining surface (18) of the refining plate (20).
12. The force sensor (14) of any preceding claim wherein the sensor body (30) floats on
the sensor elements (26).
13. The force sensor (14) of claim 12, wherein the sensor body (30) floats on the sensor
elements (26) such that the only link between the sensor body (30) and a refiner plate
(10) is through the sensor elements (26).
14. The force sensor (14) of claim 12, further comprising a holder (28), and wherein the
sensor body (30) floats on the sensor elements (26) such that the only link between
the sensor body (26) and at least one of a refiner plate (10) and the holder (28)
is through the sensor elements (26).
15. The force sensor (14) of any one of claims 1 to 11 further comprising a fastener (65,64,60,62)
for securing the sensor body (30) to the refiner.
16. The force sensor (14) of claim 15 wherein the fastener (62) applies a preload to the
sensor elements (26).
17. The force sensor (14) of any preceding claim wherein the sensor elements (26) are
clamped between the sensor body (30) and a mounting for the sensor elements (26) to
preload the sensor elements (26).
18. The force sensor (14) of any preceding claim wherein the sensor body (30) and sensor
elements (26) are arranged such that the sensor elements (26) are at an angle relative
to a refining surface (16) of the refiner.
19. The force sensor (14) of any one of the preceding claims, wherein said sensor elements
(26) are piezo electric.
20. The force sensor (14) of any one of claims 1 to 18, wherein the sensor elements (26)
are piezo-ceramic.
21. The force sensor (14) of any one of claims 1 to 20, wherein said measured force is
at least one force selected from shear force and normal force.
22. The force sensor (14) of any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein said sensor elements (26)
are adapted for connection to signal processing equipment.
23. The force sensor (14) of any one of claims 1 to 22, wherein the force sensor (14)
has a first resonant frequency that is at least about 1.5 times the bar passing frequency
of the refiner.
24. A method of measuring force acting on a refiner bar (22) of a refiner for producing
or processing wood pulp the method comprising:
providing a sensor body (30) having a sensor head (32), the sensor head (32) adapted
to replace all or a portion of the refiner bar (22),
disposing at least two sensor elements (26) in force transmission contact with and
supporting the sensor body (30),
refining wood particles or wood pulp in said refiner to produce wood pulp or refined
wood pulp, such that force is applied to the sensor head (32) and a signal indicative
of the force is developed at said at least two sensor elements (26), and
evaluating the signal as a measure of the force applied to the sensor body (30),
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the refiner bar (22) is on a refiner plate (10), the
refiner plate (10) comprising a refining surface (16) having refiner bars (22) and
a non-refining surface (18) opposed to the refining surface (16).
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the sensor body (30) is attached to the refining surface
(16) of the refiner plate (10).
27. The method of claim 25, wherein the sensor body (30) is attached to the non-refining
surface (18) of the refiner plate (10).
28. The method of any one of claims 24 to 27, wherein the sensor body (30) floats on the
sensor elements (26).
29. The method of claim wherein the sensor body (30) floats on the sensor element (26)
such that the only link between the sensor body (30) and a refiner plate (10) is through
the sensor elements (26).
30. The method of claim 28, further comprising providing a holder (28) for the sensor
body (30) and sensor elements (26), wherein the sensor body (30) floats on the sensor
elements (26) such that the only link between the sensor body (30) and at least one
of the refiner plate (10) and the holder (28) is through the sensor elements (26).
31. The method of any one of claims 24 to 30 further comprising applying a preload to
the sensor elements (26).
32. The method of any one of claims 24 to 31 further comprising clamping the sensor elements
(26) between the sensor body (30) and a mounting for the sensor elements (26) to preload
the sensor elements (26).
33. The method of any one of claims 24 to 31 disposing the sensor elements (26) at an
angle relative to a refining surface (16) of the refiner.
34. The method of any one of claims 24 to 33,, wherein the sensor elements (26) are piezo
electric.
35. The method of any one of claims 24 to 33, wherein the sensor elements (26) are piezo-ceramic.
36. The method of any one of claims 24 to 35, wherein said measured force is at least
one force selected from shear force and normal force.
37. The method of any one of claims 24 to 36, wherein shear force and normal force are
measured, said measured forces being used to regulate the operation of a refiner by
manipulating one or more variables selected from material feed rate, pulp consistency,
refiner motor load, inlet pressure, outlet pressure, plate gap, and rotational speed,
such that the ratio of the measured normal and shear forces is maintained constant
or within a predetermined range.
38. The method of any one of claims 24 to 37, wherein said measured force is used to detect
contact between opposing discs in a refiner.
39. The method of claim 38, wherein contact between opposing discs is corrected by retracting
an axially moveable plate of said refiner.
40. The method of claim 38 or 39, wherein an array of force sensors (14) is employed.
41. A refining apparatus for wood pulp having a sensing' means to determine a parameter,
wherein the sensing means comprises the force sensor (14) of any one of claims 1 to
(23).
1. Kraftsensor (14) zum Messen von Kraft, die auf einen Refiner-Steg (22) eines Refiners
zum Herstellen oder Verarbeiten von Holzstoff wirkt, wobei der Kraftsensor (14) umfasst:
einen Sensorkörper (30), der einen Sensorkopf (32) hat; und
wenigstens zwei Sensorelemente (26), die in Kraftübertragungskontakt mit dem Sensorkörper
(30) sind und ihn tragen,
wobei die wenigstens zwei Sensorelemente (26) Signale erzeugen, die den Betrag von
Kraft angeben, der auf einen Refiner-Steg (22) eines Refiners zum Herstellen oder
Verarbeiten von Holzstoff wirkt.
2. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 1, wobei sich der Refiner-Steg (22) auf einer Refiner-Platte
(10) befindet.
3. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 2, wobei die Refiner-Platte (10) eine mahlende Fläche
(16), die Refiner-Stege (22) hat, und eine nicht mahlende Fläche (18) umfasst, die
der mahlenden Fläche (16) gegenüberliegt.
4. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, wobei der Sensorkopf (32) so eingerichtet
ist, dass er einen Abschnitt des Refiner-Stegs (22) ersetzt.
5. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, wobei der Sensorkopf so eingerichtet ist,
dass er den gesamten Refiner-Steg (22) ersetzt.
6. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, wobei der Sensorkörper (30)
aus dem gleichen Material besteht wie der Refiner-Steg (22).
7. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, wobei der Sensorkopf (32)
ein Profil hat, das dem des Refiner-Stegs (22) entspricht.
8. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 3, wobei der Sensorkörper (30) an der mahlenden Fläche
(16) der Refiner-Platte (10) angebracht ist.
9. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 3, wobei der Sensorkörper (30) so eingerichtet ist,
dass er in eine Vertiefung an der mahlenden Fläche (16) der Refiner-Platte (10) passt.
10. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 3, wobei der Sensorkörper (30) an der nicht mahlenden
Fläche (16) der Refiner-Platte (10) angebracht ist.
11. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 3, wobei der Sensorkörper (30) so eingerichtet ist,
dass er in eine Vertiefung (20) in der nicht mahlenden Fläche (18) der Refiner-Platte
(10) passt.
12. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, wobei der Sensorkörper (30)
auf den Sensorelementen (26) schwebt.
13. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 12, wobei der Sensorkörper (30) so auf den Sensorelementen
(26) schwebt, dass die einzige Verbindung zwischen dem Sensorkörper (30) und einer
Refiner-Platte (10) über die Sensorelemente (26) besteht.
14. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 12, der des Weiteren einen Halter (28) umfasst und
wobei der Sensorkörper (30) so auf den Sensorelementen (26) schwebt, dass die einzige
Verbindung zwischen dem Sensorkörper (26) und wenigstens einer Refiner-Platte (10)
oder dem Halter (28) über die Sensorelemente (26) besteht.
15. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 11, der des Weiteren ein Befestigungselement
(65, 64, 60, 62) zum Befestigen des Sensorkörpers (30) an dem Refiner umfasst.
16. Kraftsensor (14) nach Anspruch 15, wobei das Befestigungselement (62) eine Vorlast
auf die Sensorelemente (26) ausübt.
17. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Sensorelemente
(26) zwischen dem Sensorkörper (30) und einer Anbringung für die Sensorelemente (26)
eingeklemmt sind, um die Sensorelemente (26) vorzuspannen.
18. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, wobei der Sensorkörper (30)
und die Sensorelemente (26) so angeordnet sind, dass die Sensorelemente (26) in einem
Winkel relativ zu einer mahlenden Fläche (16) des Refiners sind.
19. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Sensorelemente
(26) piezoelektrisch sind.
20. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 18, wobei die Sensorelemente (26)
piezokeramisch sind.
21. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 20, wobei die gemessene Kraft wenigstens
eine Kraft ist, die aus Scherkraft und Normalkraft ausgewählt wird.
22. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 17, wobei die Sensorelemente (26)
zur Verbindung mit Signalverarbeitungseinrichtungen eingerichtet sind.
23. Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 22, wobei der Kraftsensor (14) eine
erste Resonanzfrequenz hat, die wenigstens ungefähr das 1,5-fache der Steg-Durchlassfrequenz
des Refiners ist.
24. Verfahren zum Messen von Kraft, die auf einen Refiner-Steg (22) eines Refiners zum
Produzieren oder Verarbeiten von Holzstoff wirkt, wobei das Verfahren umfasst:
Bereitstellen eines Sensorkörpers (30), der einen Sensorkopf (32) hat, wobei der Sensorkopf
(32) so eingerichtet ist, dass er den Refiner-Steg (22) vollständig oder teilweise
ersetzt;
Anordnen von wenigstens zwei Sensorelementen (26), die in Kraftübertragungskontakt
mit dem Sensorkörper (30) sind und ihn tragen;
Mahlen von Holzteilchen oder Holzstoff in dem Refiner, um Holzstoff oder gemahlenen
Holzstoff herzustellen, so dass Kraft auf den Sensorkopf (32) ausgeübt wird, und ein
Signal, das die Kraft anzeigt, an den wenigstens zwei Sensorelementen (26) erzeugt
wird, und
Bewerten des Signals als ein Maß der Kraft, die auf den Sensorkörper (30) ausgeübt
wird.
25. Verfahren nach Anspruch 24, wobei der Refiner-Steg (22) sich an einer Refiner-Platte
(10) befindet und die Refiner-Platte (10) eine mahlende Fläche (16), die Refiner-Stege
(22) hat, sowie eine nicht mahlende Fläche (18) umfasst, die der mahlenden Fläche
(16) gegenüberliegt.
26. Verfahren nach Anspruch 25, wobei der Sensorkörper (30) an der mahlenden Fläche (16)
der Refiner-Platte (10) angebracht ist.
27. Verfahren nach Anspruch 25, wobei der Sensorkörper (30) an der nicht mahlenden Fläche
(18) der Refiner-Platte (10) angebracht ist.
28. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 24 bis 27, wobei der Sensorkörper (30) auf den
Sensorelementen (26) schwebt.
29. Verfahren nach Anspruch 28, wobei der Sensorkörper (30) so auf den Sensorelementen
(26) schwebt, dass die einzige Verbindung zwischen dem Sensorkörper (30) und einer
Refiner-Platte (6) über die Sensorelemente (26) besteht.
30. Verfahren nach Anspruch 28, das des Weiteren das Bereitstellen eines Halters (28)
für den Sensorkörper (30) und die Sensorelemente (26) umfasst, wobei der Sensorkörper
(30) so auf den Sensorelementen (26) schwebt, dass die einzige Verbindung zwischen
dem Sensorkörper (30) und wenigstens der Refiner-Platte (10) oder dem Halter (28)
über die Sensorelemente (26) besteht.
31. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 24 bis 30, das des Weiteren das Ausüben einer Vorlast
auf die Sensorelemente (26) umfasst.
32. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 24 bis 31, das des Weiteren das Einklemmen der
Sensorelemente (26) zwischen dem Sensorkörper (30) und einer Anbringung für die Sensorelemente
(26) zum Vorspannen der Sensorelemente (26) umfasst.
33. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 24 bis 31, wobei die Sensorelemente (26) in einem
Winkel relativ zu einer mahlenden Fläche (16) des Refiners angeordnet sind.
34. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 24 bis 33, wobei die Sensorelemente (26) piezoelektrisch
sind.
35. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 24 bis 33, wobei die Sensorelemente (26) piezokeramisch
sind.
36. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 24 bis 35, wobei die gemessene Kraft wenigstens
eine Kraft ist, die aus Scherkraft und Normalkraft ausgewählt wird.
37. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 24 bis 36, wobei Scherkraft und Normalkraft gemessen
werden und die gemessenen Kräfte verwendet werden, um den Betrieb eines Refiners zu
regulieren, indem eine oder mehrere Variablen, die aus Materialzufuhrgeschwindigkeit,
Stoffkonsistenz, Refiner-Motorlast, Einlassdruck, Auslassdruck, Plattenzwischenraum
und Drehgeschwindigkeit ausgewählt werden, so beeinflusst werden, dass das Verhältnis
der gemessenen Normal- und der Scherkraft konstant oder in einem vorgegebenen Bereich
gehalten wird.
38. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 24 bis 37, wobei die gemessene Kraft verwendet
wird, um Kontakt zwischen einander gegenüberliegenden Scheiben in einem Refiner zu
erfassen.
39. Verfahren nach Anspruch 38, wobei Kontakt zwischen einander gegenüberliegenden Scheiben
korrigiert wird, indem eine axial bewegliche Platte des Refiners eingezogen wird.
40. Verfahren nach Anspruch 38 oder 39, wobei eine Anordnung von Kraftsensoren (14) eingesetzt
wird.
41. Refiner-Vorrichtung für Holzstoff mit einer Erfassungseinrichtung zum Bestimmen eines
Parameters, wobei die Erfassungseinrichtung den Kraftsensor (14) nach einem der Ansprüche
1 bis 23 umfasst.
1. Capteur de force (14) pour mesurer une force agissant sur une barre de raffineur (22)
d'un raffineur pour produire ou traiter de la pulpe de bois, ledit capteur de force
(14) comprenant :
un corps de capteur (30) comportant une tête de capteur (32) ; et
au moins deux éléments de capteur (26) en contact de transmission de force avec le
corps de capteur (30) et qui supportent celui-ci,
dans lequel lesdits éléments de capteur au nombre d'au moins deux (26) produisent
des signaux indicatifs de l'ampleur de force agissant sur une barre de raffineur (22)
d'un raffineur pour produire ou pour traiter de la pulpe bois.
2. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la barre de raffineur
(22) se trouve sur une plaque de raffineur (10).
3. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 2, dans lequel la plaque de raffineur
(10) comprend une surface de triturage (16) comportant des barres de raffineur (22)
et une surface de non-triturage (18) opposée à la surface de triturage (16).
4. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 1, 2 ou 3, dans lequel la tête de capteur
(32) est adaptée pour remplacer une partie de la barre de raffineur (22).
5. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 1, 2 ou 3, dans lequel la tête de capteur
est adaptée pour remplacer la totalité de la barre de raffineur (22).
6. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans
lequel le corps de capteur (30) est constitué du même matériau que la barre de raffineur
(22).
7. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans
lequel la tête de capteur (32) a un profil correspondant à celui de la barre de raffineur
(22).
8. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 3, dans lequel le corps de capteur (30)
est fixé à la surface de triturage (16) de la plaque de raffineur (10).
9. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 3, dans lequel le corps de capteur (30)
est adapté pour être disposé dans une cavité sur la surface de triturage (16) de la
plaque de raffineur (10).
10. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 3, dans lequel le corps de capteur (30)
est fixé à la surface de non-triturage (16) de la plaque de raffinage (10).
11. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 3, dans lequel le corps de capteur (30)
est adapté de façon à être disposé dans une cavité (20) dans la surface de non-raffinage
(18) de la plaque de raffineur (10).
12. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans
lequel le corps de capteur (30) flotte sur les éléments de capteur (26).
13. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 12, dans lequel le corps de capteur (30)
flotte sur les éléments de capteur (26) de telle sorte que la seule liaison entre
les corps de capteur (30) et une plaque de raffineur (10) se fasse par l'intermédiaire
des éléments de capteur (26).
14. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 12, comprenant de plus un support (28),
et dans lequel le corps de capteur (30) flotte sur les éléments de capteur (26) de
telle sorte que la seule liaison entre le corps de capteur (26) et au moins l'un parmi
la plaque de raffineur (10) et le support (28) se fasse par l'intermédiaire des éléments
de capteur (26).
15. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 11, comprenant
de plus un élément de fixation (65, 64, 60, 62) pour fixer le corps de capteur (30)
au raffineur.
16. Capteur de force (14) selon la revendication 15, dans lequel l'élément de fixation
(62) applique une pré-sollicitation aux éléments de capteur (26).
17. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans
lequel les éléments de capteur (26) sont serrés entre les corps de capteur (30) et
une monture pour les éléments de capteur (26) de façon à pré-solliciter les éléments
de capteur (26).
18. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans
lequel le corps de capteur (30) et les éléments de capteur (26) sont agencés de telle
sorte que les éléments de capteur (26) présentent un certain angle par rapport à une
surface de triturage (16) du raffineur.
19. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans
lequel lesdits éléments de capteur (26) sont piézo-électriques.
20. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 18, dans lequel
les éléments de capteur (26) sont piézo-céramiques.
21. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 20, dans lequel
ladite force mesurée est au moins une force sélectionnée parmi une force de cisaillement
et une force normale.
22. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 17, dans lequel
lesdits éléments de capteur (26) sont adaptés pour la connexion à un équipement de
traitement du signal.
23. Capteur de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 22, dans lequel
le capteur de force (14) a une première fréquence de résonance qui est d'au moins
environ 1,5 fois la fréquence de passage de barre du raffineur.
24. Procédé pour mesurer une force agissant sur une barre de raffineur (22) d'un raffineur
pour produire ou traiter de la pulpe de bois, le procédé comprenant les étapes consistant
à :
disposer un corps de capteur (30) comportant une tête de capteur (32), la tête de
capteur (32) étant adaptée pour remplacer tout ou partie de la barre de raffineur
(22) ;
disposer au moins deux éléments de capteur (26) en contact de transmission de force
avec le corps de capteur (30) et supportant celui-ci ;
triturer des particules de bois ou de la pulpe de bois dans ledit raffineur pour produire
de la pulpe de bois ou de la pulpe de bois triturée, de telle sorte qu'une force soit
appliquée à la tête de capteur (32) et qu'un signal indicatif de la force soit développé
sur lesdits éléments de capteur au nombre d'au moins deux (26) ; et
évaluer le signal comme étant une mesure de la force appliquée au corps de capteur
(30).
25. Procédé selon la revendication 24, dans lequel la barre de raffineur (22) se trouve
sur une plaque de raffineur (10), la plaque de raffineur (10) comprenant une surface
de triturage (16) comportant des barres de raffineur (22) et une surface de non-triturage
(18) opposée à la surface de triturage (16).
26. Procédé selon la revendication 25, dans lequel le corps de capteur (30) est fixé à
la surface de triturage (16) de la plaque de raffineur (10).
27. Procédé selon la revendication 25, dans lequel le corps de capteur (30) est fixé à
la surface de non-triturage (18) de la plaque de raffineur (10).
28. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 27, dans lequel le corps de
capteur (30) flotte sur les éléments de capteur (26).
29. Procédé selon la revendication 28, dans lequel le corps de capteur (30) flotte sur
les éléments de capteur (26), de telle sorte que la seule liaison entre le corps de
capteur (30) et une plaque de raffineur (10) se fasse par l'intermédiaire des éléments
de capteur (26).
30. Procédé selon la revendication 28, comprenant de plus la disposition d'un support
(28) pour le corps de capteur (30) et les éléments de capteur (26), dans lequel le
corps de capteur (30) flotte sur les éléments de capteur (26) de telle sorte que la
seule liaison entre le corps de capteur (30) et au moins l'un parmi la plaque de raffineur
(10) et le support (28) se fasse par l'intermédiaire des éléments de capteur (26).
31. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 30, comprenant de plus l'application
d'une pré-sollicitation aux éléments de capteur (26).
32. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 31, comprenant de plus le serrage
des éléments de capteur (26) entre le corps de capteur (30) et une monture pour les
éléments de capteur (26) pour pré-solliciter les éléments de capteur (26).
33. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 31, disposant les éléments
de capteur (26) selon un certain angle par rapport à une surface de triturage (16)
du raffineur.
34. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 33, dans lequel les éléments
de capteur (26) sont piézo-électriques.
35. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 33, dans lequel les éléments
de capteur (26) sont piézo-céramiques.
36. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 35, dans lequel ladite force
mesurée est au moins une force sélectionnée parmi une force de cisaillement et une
force normale.
37. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 36, dans lequel une force de
cisaillement et une force normale sont mesurées, lesdites forces mesurées étant utilisées
pour réguler le fonctionnement d'un raffineur par manipulation d'une ou plusieurs
variables sélectionnées parmi le débit de délivrance de matériau, la consistance de
la pulpe, la charge du moteur de raffineur, la pression d'entrée, la pression de sortie,
l'espace de plaques et la vitesse de rotation, de telle sorte que le rapport des forces
normale et de cisaillement mesurées soit maintenu constant ou à l'intérieur d'une
plage prédéterminée.
38. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 37, dans lequel ladite force
mesurée est utilisée pour détecter un contact entre des disques opposés dans un raffineur.
39. Procédé selon la revendication 38, dans lequel le contact entre des disques opposés
est corrigé par rétraction d'une plaque axialement mobile dudit raffineur.
40. Procédé selon la revendication 38 ou 39, dans lequel un groupement de capteurs de
force (14) est employé.
41. Dispositif de triturage pour de la pulpe de bois, comportant des moyens de détection
pour déterminer un paramètre, dans lequel les moyens de détection comprennent le capteur
de force (14) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 23.