BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
[0001] This invention relates to hydraulic lash adjusters for taking up slack in a valve
train, and to valve train assemblies which incorporate hydraulic lash adjusters.
Description of the Prior Art
[0002] A typical structure of this type is shown schematically in Figure 1. The valve train
assembly 2 comprises a rocker arm 4 and a hydraulic lash adjuster 6. One end 8 of
the rocker arm 4 engages the stem 10 of a valve 11. The other end 12 of the rocker
arm is mounted for pivotal movement on the lash adjuster 6.
[0003] The rocker arm 4 is provided with a roller 14 mounted on an axle 16 carried by the
rocker arm 4.
[0004] A cam 18 mounted on a cam shaft 15 has a lobe 17 which can engage the roller 14 and
thus pivot the rocker arm 4 anti-clockwise as shown in the drawing. This depresses
the valve stem 10 against the force of a valve spring (not shown) and thus opens the
valve. As the cam continues to rotate, and the base circle 19 of the cam profile again
engages the roller 14, the valve spring returns the valve and the rocker arm 4 to
the position shown in Figure 1.
[0005] As is well known, a hydraulic lash adjuster has an oil-containing chamber and a spring
arranged to enlarge the chamber and thus extend the lash adjuster. Oil flows into
the chamber via a one-way valve, but can escape the chamber only slowly, for example
via closely-spaced leakdown surfaces.
[0006] Accordingly, the lash adjuster 6 of Figure 1 can extend to accommodate any slack
in the valve train assembly, such as between the cam 18 and the roller 14. After it
is extended, however, the oil-filled chamber provides sufficient support for the pivoting
movement of the rocker arm 4.
[0007] It is important for the base circle 19 of the cam 18 to be concentric with respect
to the axis of rotation of the cam shaft 15. Any slight eccentricity ("run-out") could
cause the valve to close later than it should, or open during the movement of the
base circle past the roller 14. The cam 18 is often formed by sintering and may not
have, in its initial state, particularly accurate dimensions. Accordingly, it is conventional,
before assembly, to grind either the outer surface, including the base circle 19,
of the cam 18, or to grind the inner diameter which is fitted to the cam shaft 15,
to ensure accurate concentricity of the base circle 19 relative to the axis of rotation
of the cam shaft 15.
[0008] Although the arrangement described above works well during normal running conditions,
problems can arise in certain circumstances. For example, in order to prevent problems
when starting the engine from cold, it has been proposed to use a technique whereby
the valves and cylinder head are caused to heat up very quickly. Referring to Figure
2, the rapid heating of the head 20 of the valve 11 causes the head 20 to expand relative
to the valve seat 21. This expansion results in the valve moving downwardly against
the force of the valve spring, as shown on the right of Figure 2. This process creates
positive lash, which is accommodated by expansion of the hydraulic adjuster as the
camshaft rotates. However, as the cylinder head 22 and the valve seat 21 then heat
up, their expansion allows the valve 11 to move back upwardly, thus creating negative
lash (which will be subsequently exacerbated due to expansion of the valve stem).
This negative lash can be accommodated by shrinking of the lash adjuster. However,
because the heating process is taking place rapidly, and the shortening of the lash
adjuster is limited by the rate of leakage of oil from the high pressure chamber,
the lash adjuster does not shorten sufficiently quickly. This problem is exacerbated
because the oil is still cold and therefore viscous, thus reducing the leakage rate.
This results in valves remaining open (shown in dotted lines in Fig. 1), causing starting
problems.
[0009] There have been proposed lash adjusters which provide "lift loss", that is, which
are capable of shrinking to a certain extent before the sealed high-pressure chamber
prevents further movement. See for example US-A-6039017. Thus, there is a degree of
lost motion of the lash adjuster before the valve starts to open. This lost motion
is recovered by a spring after the valve has closed. Using such a lash adjuster, a
small degree of negative lash can be quickly accommodated by the lost motion of the
lash adjuster, thus making it more certain that the valve will close.
[0010] There are also lash adjusters which incorporate a seal to prevent leakage of oil
from the high-pressure chamber, and in which the chamber valve is arranged such that
it is normally open (known as "sealed-leakdown" adjusters). See US-A-5622147. This
would permit a small amount of shortening of the lash adjuster before the valve closes
as a result of the hydrodynamic force of the oil flowing out of the chamber. However,
the amount of lift loss produced is somewhat uncertain, and will depend significantly
on oil viscosity and hence temperature, as well as other factors. Also, this form
of lash adjuster can sometimes encounter problems when a hot engine is stopped with
a valve partially open. The pressure of the valve spring on the lash adjuster causes
the high-pressure chamber to remain sealed, so that, if the engine cools and negative
lash is created, oil cannot flow out of the chamber and the lash is therefore not
accommodated.
[0011] It would be desirable to provide a lash adjuster of the sealed-leakdown type in which
such problems are at least mitigated.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0012] Aspects of the present invention are set out in the accompanying claims.
[0013] In a first aspect of the invention, the high-pressure chamber is sealed by a sealing
means engaging both the body of the lash adjuster and the plunger as the plunger moves
inwardly, thus preventing further inward movement. The arrangement is such that as
the cam turns, and returns to base circle, and the pressure on the plunger decreases,
the plunger and sealing means separate, preferably assisted by a biasing means such
as a leaf spring.. Accordingly, the pressure in the chamber is relieved whenever the
base circle of the cam is reached. Because the chamber is open, the plunger assembly
can be pushed inwardly by a certain amount to guarantee valve closure before the chamber
is again closed.
[0014] According to a preferred aspect of the invention, it has been perceived that use
of a hydraulic lash adjuster which provides lift loss (preferably, but not necessarily,
an adjuster according to the first aspect of the invention) means that the base circle
radius variation of the cam no longer has to be minimised by grinding, allowing the
use of net-shaped cam shaft technology instead of more expensive ground cams.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] Arrangements embodying the invention will now be described by way of example with
reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 schematically shows a conventional valve train assembly;
Figure 2 illustrates differential expansion of engine components in an engine of known
type;
Figure 3 is a longitudinal cross section through a hydraulic lash adjuster according
to a first embodiment of the invention;
Figures 4 to 7 show respective components of the hydraulic lash adjuster of Figure
3;
Figures 8 and 9 are enlarged views of part of the hydraulic lash adjuster of Figure
3 illustrating different states encountered during operation of the lash adjuster;
and
Figure 10 is a longitudinal section through a hydraulic lash adjuster according to
a second embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0016] Referring to Figure 3, this shows a lash adjuster 30 according to a first embodiment
of the invention. The lash adjuster has a cylindrical body 23 formed with a longitudinal
blind bore 24. A plunger assembly 26, which in this embodiment is a one-piece assembly
but could alternatively be formed of two or more parts, is mounted for sliding motion
inwardly and outwardly of the bore 24. The plunger assembly 26 and blind bore 24 define
between them a high-pressure oil chamber 28 at the lower end of the lash adjuster
30.
[0017] The plunger assembly 26 is formed with a relatively narrow waist 31 so that a low-pressure
oil chamber 32 is formed between this waist and the bore 24. Oil from the associated
engine can enter the chamber 32 via an aperture 33.
[0018] The lash adjuster 30 is provided with an annular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) seal
34 (also shown in cross-section in Figure 4). The cylindrical outer surface of the
seal 34 is an interference fit in, and sealingly engages, the bore 24. The upper surface
of the seal 34 can sealingly engage a circumferential outer sealing surface 36 on
the bottom of the plunger assembly 26.
[0019] A spring 40 engages the upper, central part of a cap-shaped retainer 42 (shown in
plan view in Figure 5 and side view in Figure 6), and forces the retainer 42 into
engagement with the plunger assembly 26, the retainer 42 engaging the centre of the
base of the assembly 26. The upper part of the retainer is located within the annular
seal 34 and the circumferential outer part is located under the annular seal.
[0020] The spring 40 pushes the seal 34 and the plunger assembly 26 outwardly of the bore
24. In this state, oil can flow from the low pressure chamber 32 around the side of
the plunger assembly, through a gap 44 between the sealing surface 36 and the seal
34 and into the high pressure chamber 28. The outer diameter of the lower part of
the plunger assembly 26 is sufficiently smaller than the diameter of the bore 24 to
allow oil readily to flow therebetween. Accordingly, the plunger assembly can move
outwardly to take up slack in the valve train. Any significant outward movement of
the plunger assembly will also result in the seal 34 being shifted in the same direction
by the outer part of the retainer 42.
[0021] The lash adjuster 30 is also provided with a leaf spring 46, shown in plan view in
Figure 7, disposed between the lower end of the plunger assembly 26 and the upper
surface of the retainer 42. See also the enlarged views of Figures 8 and 9. The lower
surface of the plunger assembly 26 is provided with a circular recess 48, which is
deeper at the radially outer part thereof. The leaf spring 46 has four arms 50 which
are located under the recess 48, and the outer ends of which are located over the
PTFE seal 34.
[0022] Figure 8 shows the state of the lash adjuster when the lobe of the cam is applying
force to open the valve. The plunger assembly 26 is depressed, engaging the PTFE seal
34 so that the high pressure chamber 28 is closed and further inward movement of the
plunger assembly 26 is thus prevented. In this state, the arms 50 of the leaf spring
46 are deflected upwardly by their engagement with the PTFE seal 34.
[0023] When the base circle of the cam is approached, the plunger assembly 26 is allowed
to move outwardly under the force of the spring 40. This of course can occur only
if oil is allowed to flow into the chamber via the gap 44 (Figure 9) which is at that
stage created between the sealing surface 36 of the plunger assembly 26 and the seal
34. Various forces combine to ensure this movement occurs, including the resilience
of the arms 50 of the leaf spring 46, the force of the spring 40 and the force holding
the seal 34 against the wall of the bore 24 (which may be a combination of friction
and stickiness caused by migration of PTFE into the wall). Such forces have to be
sufficient to overcome the pressure holding the seal 34 against the sealing surface
36, and then any hydrodynamic forces of the oil escaping the chamber 28, which would
tend to move the seal 34 upwardly. The spring 46 is particularly desirable in this
connection, as it tends to peel apart the seal 34 and the sealing surface 36. However,
the exact force exerted by the leaf spring 46 is not critical.
[0024] Accordingly, during operation, it is ensured that the high pressure in the chamber
28 is relieved after the valve has closed, thereby creating lift loss so that the
plunger assembly 26 can move inwardly before the valve starts to open, and outwardly
after the valve has closed. If the lash adjuster needs to shrink rapidly in order
to accommodate the closing motion of the valve, this is accommodated by virtue of
the pressure on the plunger assembly 26 causing the assembly to move to a position
intermediate the states shown in Figures 8 and 9, thus guaranteeing closure of the
valve. If negative lash persists, the seal 34 will be gradually pushed down by the
plunger 26 and the spring 46, thereby eventually restoring the intended maximum amount
of lift loss.
[0025] The lash adjuster of Figure 3 is intended to be used with a rocker arm such as that
shown at 4 in Figure 1. The lash adjuster could form the pivot of the arm, and the
cam could operate on the rocker arm at a location between the lash adjuster and the
valve stem (as in Figure 1), or various other configurations (known in themselves)
could be used, for example having the lash adjuster disposed between the rocker arm
and either the valve stem or the cam.
[0026] Figure 10 shows a second embodiment, in the form of a direct-acting bucket tappet
120 incorporating a hydraulic lash adjuster 30 and arranged to move a valve stem 10
in response to the rotation of a cam 18. This embodiment has components corresponding
to those of the Figure 3 arrangement, with like components bearing like reference
numerals, and operates in the same way. The arrangement differs from the Figure 3
arrangement only insofar as the components are configured in a per se known way for
use with a bucket tappet which has the low-pressure reservoir 32.
[0027] The cams 18 used to operate the valves of the above arrangements have been formed
by a sintering operation (but could alternatively have been formed by other means,
such as hydroforming or hot- or cold-forming). However, no additional grinding operations
have been performed on either the outer surface of the base circles or the inner surfaces
of the cams. Accordingly, the base circle of each cam is not necessarily accurately
concentric with respect to the axis of rotation. The cam 18 is thus net-shaped. However,
because of the use of the hydraulic lash adjusters described above, the base circle
radius variations of the cam no longer have to be minimised by grinding, because any
non-concentricity of the base circle will be accommodated by inward movement of the
outer end of the plunger assembly 26, thus avoiding incorrect valve opening. (The
term net-shaped is generally understood, and used herein, in the sense of having a
shape and dimensions which are at least substantially the same as those resulting
from the initial forming of the object. This does not exclude the possibility of small
changes in dimensions which are a consequence of, for example, surface-treatment for
the purpose of smoothing, as distinct from dimensional changes (e.g. by grinding)
for the purpose of altering the function performed as a result of those dimensions.)
[0028] Although significant grinding is avoided, it may be desirable for the outer surface
of the cam to be treated for the purpose of smoothing the exterior of the cam. This
may be of particular value in the embodiment of Figure 10 when the cam operates on
a direct-acting bucket tappet, rather than on a roller.
[0029] In all the arrangements described above, because movement of the outer end of the
plunger is allowed, the valve opens later and closes sooner, in relation to the rotation
of the cam, than in prior art arrangements. In order to compensate, the profile of
the cam is altered as compared with prior art arrangements. A further alteration to
the profile may be made in order to extend the ramp of the cam lobe to ensure that
the movement of the outer end of the plunger assembly 26 takes place at a controlled
velocity to reduce impact forces.
[0030] In the above embodiments, the gap 44 defines the maximum amount of lift loss. This
in turn is specified by the dimensions of the seal 34 and the retainer 42. The leaf
spring 46 preferably has a thickness substantially equal to the thus-defined gap size
(although if the spring is slightly thicker, this simply means it will remain in a
partially-flexed condition). The gap, and hence the amount of lift loss, should:
(a) equal or exceed the maximum amount of negative lash created by the differential
thermal expansion of the various engine components, plus, if a net-shaped cam is used,
the lash created by the maximum expected amount of run-out of the base circle, i.e.
the maximum amount by which the base circle radius varies; and
(b) be less than the amount which would cause excessive valve closure speeds. (It
will be appreciated that provision of lift loss means that valve opening and closing
will take place over a smaller arc of cam rotation, and thus at increased speed.)
[0031] In one preferred embodiment the size of the gap 44 is in the range of 0.1 mm to 0.3
mm, and more preferably in the range 0.15 mm to 0.25 mm.
[0032] The spring 40 of the embodiments described above biases both the plunger assembly
26 and the seal 34 outwardly, although it does not bias these components towards each
other and so does not inhibit opening of the chamber. It would alternatively be possible
to have separate biasing means for the plunger assembly 26 and the seal 34; in this
case, preferably, the biasing means for the seal is limited in the extent to which
it can move the seal towards the plunger (e.g. by inter-engagement of the separate
biasing means and the plunger, or suitable selection of the strength of this biasing
means with respect to that of the leaf spring 46) so that it does not inhibit the
restoration of the gap 44.
1. A hydraulic lash adjuster for an internal combustion engine, the lash adjuster comprising
a body (23), a plunger assembly (26) slidably received within a bore (24) in the body
and cooperating with the body to define a fluid pressure chamber (28), and biasing
means (40) for urging the plunger assembly (26) in an outward direction with respect
to the bore (24), thus enlarging the pressure chamber (28), to take up slack in a
valve drive train, the adjuster further comprising sealing means (34) which is sealingly
engaged with the body (23) and which is brought into sealing engagement with the plunger
assembly (26) in response to movement of the plunger assembly in an inward direction
with respect to the bore for restricting fluid flow from the pressure chamber (28)
so as to inhibit further movement of the plunger assembly in said inward direction,
the adjuster being arranged such that the plunger assembly (26) is disengaged from
said sealing means (34) and the pressure in said pressure chamber (28) is relieved
upon movement of the plunger assembly in said outward direction, so that a limited
amount of inward movement can take place each time pressure is applied to the plunger
assembly (26) before the chamber (28) is again closed.
2. A hydraulic lash adjuster for an internal combustion engine, the lash adjuster comprising
a body (23), a plunger (26) slidably received within a bore (24) in the body (23),
and sealing means (34) provided in said bore (24) in sealing engagement with the body
(23) and sealingly engageable with a sealing surface (36) of the plunger (26) to close
a fluid pressure chamber (28) defined by the plunger (26) and the body (23) to prevent
inward movement of the plunger, the lash adjuster further comprising biasing means
(40) for urging the plunger (26) and sealing means (34) in an outward direction with
respect to the bore (24), thus enlarging the pressure chamber (28), to take up slack
in a valve drive train, the adjuster being arranged such that the sealing surface
(36) of the plunger is disengaged from said sealing means (34) and the pressure in
said pressure chamber (28) is relieved upon movement of the plunger (26) in said outward
direction, so that a limited amount of inward movement can take place each time pressure
is applied to the plunger (26) before the chamber (28) is again closed.
3. An adjuster as claimed in claim 1 or 2, including second biasing means (46) arranged
to bias the sealing means (34) and the plunger (26) away from each other.
4. An adjuster as claimed in claim 3, wherein the second biasing means is a leaf spring
(46).
5. An adjuster as claimed in claim 3 or 4, wherein the second biasing means (46) is mounted
for movement with the plunger (26).
6. An adjuster as claimed in claim 2, including retaining means (42) movable with the
plunger (26) for supporting the sealing means (34) for limited movement with respect
to the plunger, thereby to permit opening and closing of the chamber.
7. An adjuster as claimed in claim 6, including second biasing means (46) also supported
by said retaining means (42) and arranged to bias the sealing means (34) and the sealing
surface (36) of the plunger away from each other.
8. A valve train assembly for operating a valve, the assembly comprising a cam (18) arranged
to cause the valve (11) to open and close, and a hydraulic lash adjuster as claimed
in any preceding claim for taking up slack in the train between the cam (18) and the
valve (11).
9. An assembly as claimed in claim 8, wherein the cam (18) is a non-ground cam.
10. An assembly as claimed in claim 9, wherein the cam (18) is net-shaped.
11. An assembly as claimed in any one of claims 8 to 10, the assembly including a rocker
arm arranged to be pivoted by the cam in order to operate the valve.
12. An assembly as claimed in any one of claims 8 to 10, wherein the lash adjuster is
a direct-acting bucket tappet.