| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 1 267 650 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
28.12.2005 Bulletin 2005/52 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 06.03.2001 |
|
| (86) |
International application number: |
|
PCT/GB2001/000945 |
| (87) |
International publication number: |
|
WO 2001/065954 (13.09.2001 Gazette 2001/37) |
|
| (54) |
TOBACCO TREATMENT
TABAKVERARBEITUNG
TRAITEMENT DU TABAC
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
| (30) |
Priority: |
10.03.2000 GB 0005665 20.05.2000 GB 0012111
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
02.01.2003 Bulletin 2003/01 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited |
|
London WC2R 3LA (GB) |
|
| (72) |
Inventors: |
|
- MCADAM, Kevin, Gerard
Southampton SO14 6FR (GB)
- O'REILLY, David
Bassett,
Southampton SO16 7BW (GB)
- MANSON, Andrew, John
London WC2R 2PB (GB)
- ANDERSON, Ian, Geoffrey, Marchmont
Rownhams,
Southampton SO16 8DW (GB)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Walford, Margot Ruth |
|
Patents Department,
British American Tobacco R&D Centre,
Regents Park Road Southampton SO15 8TL Southampton SO15 8TL (GB) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
WO-A-98/05226 US-A- 5 584 989
|
US-A- 4 153 063 US-A- 5 810 020
|
|
| |
|
|
- PROKOPCZYK ET AL: 'Supercritical Fluid Extraction in the Determiation of Tobacco-Specific-N-Nitrosamines
in Smokeless Tobacco' CHEMICAL RESEARCH TOXICOLOGY vol. 5, no. 3, 1992, pages 336
- 340
- PROKOPCZYK ET AL: 'Improved Methodology for the Quantitative Assessment of Tobacco-Specific
N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco by Supercritical Fluid Extraction' JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL
AND FOOD CHEMISTRY vol. 43, no. 4, 1995, pages 916 - 922
- SONG ET AL: 'Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
for the Analysis of Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines in Cigarettes' ANALYTICAL CHEMSITRY
vol. 71, no. 7, 1999, pages 1303 - 1308
- KATZ: 'Decaffeination of Coffee' TECHNOLOGY ELSEVIER APPLIED SCIENCE vol. 2, 1987,
pages 59 - 71
- ZOSEL: 'Separation with Supercritical Gases', 1980, VERLAG CHEMIE * page 15 - page
23 *
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] The present invention relates to a method of treating tobacco to reduce or eliminate
the content of nitrosamines therein, particularly tobacco specific nitrosamines.
[0002] Tobacco specific nitrosamines include N'-nitrosonornicotine, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone,
N'-nitrosoanatabine and N'-nitrosoanabasine.
[0003] Various methods are known for the removal of nitrosamines from tobacco. In US 5,803,081
and WO 98/58555 green leaf tobacco (i.e. tobacco prior to curing) is subjected to
microwave radiation, convection heating or freeze drying in order to kill microbes
thought to be responsible for the production of nitrosamines during curing of the
tobacco. A disadvantage of this method is that the method includes the requirement
of specific curing practices for the tobacco, which curing practices are carried out
on the tobacco at an early stage post-harvest.
[0004] An aim of the present invention is to provide an improved method for reducing nitrosamines
in tobacco.
[0005] A further aim of the present invention is to provide an improved method for selectively
reducing nitrosamines in tobacco.
[0006] The present invention provides a tobacco treatment process in accordance with claim
1.
[0007] Preferably, nitrosamines are separated from the supercritical fluid extraction medium
by subjecting the extraction medium to a nitrosamine removal process.
[0008] Suitably, the nitrosamine removal process may comprise a chemisorption step. Preferably,
the chemisorption step may comprise the use of an ion exchanger.
[0009] Alternatively, the nitrosamine removal process may comprise an adsorbent step. A
suitable adsorbent may be selected from one or more of the group consisting of glass
beads, activated charcoal, aluminium silicate and zeolites. Other suitable adsorbents
known to those persons skilled in the art may also be used.
[0010] In a further alternative, the nitrosamine removal process may comprise treatment
of the extraction medium with ultraviolet (UV) light, resulting in the breakdown of
nitrosamines in the extraction medium.
[0011] Yet further alternatives include the removal of nitrosamines by precipitating the
nitrosamines from the extraction medium; by subjecting the extraction medium to nitrosamine
specific enzyme breakdown; or by chromatographic or other methods of separation known
to those persons skilled in the art.
[0012] The process for nitrosamine removal from the extraction medium may comprise more
than one of the above outlined nitrosamine removal processes. In certain circumstances,
at least, use of a plurality of removal processes (together comprising a multi-process)
will result in an enhanced specificity of removal of nitrosamines. For example, the
nitrosamine removal process may be a multi-process comprising a chemisorption step
in combination with or followed by treatment with UV light. Prior to the UV light
treatment a washing step may be required to remove the nitrosamines from the chemisorption
medium, the UV light then being applied to the washings. Water, an acid, a salt solution
or an alcohol may suitably be used in the washing step.
[0013] Suitably, the extraction medium having had some, if not all, of the nitrosamines
removed therefrom may be brought into contact with tobacco, such that extract(s) other
than nitrosamines in the medium may be incorporated or re-incorporated with the tobacco.
Such extract(s) may, for example, comprise nicotine and/or flavour substances.
[0014] Much by preference, the supercritical fluid used is supercritical carbon dioxide,
although other supercritical fluids known to the skilled person may be suitable.
[0015] Suitably, an acid, preferably an organic acid, may be added to the tobacco prior
to treatment of the tobacco with supercritical fluid. Alternatively, the acid may
be incorporated with the supercritical fluid. Furthermore, when an ion exchanger or
adsorbent material is present, the acid may be incorporated with the ion exchanger
or adsorbent. A suitable acid may be an organic acid selected from one or more of
the group consisting of malonic acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid,
adipic acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, mucic acid and citric acid, or a salt derivative(s)
thereof. Preferably, the organic acid is a citric acid salt, potassium citrate for
example. Other suitable acids may be mineral acids, for example sulphuric acid and
phosphoric acid. Suitably, when the acid is applied to the tobacco the acid is in
solution. Such solution may be applied by spraying. Advantageously, the application
of the acid to the tobacco may take place in a casing cylinder conventionally used
within the tobacco industry for applying casings to tobacco.
[0016] Other modifiers, such as organic solvents or alcohols, for example, may alternatively
or additionally be used.
[0017] Preferably, the extraction treatment of the tobacco with the supercritical fluid
takes place at an elevated pressure and temperature. Suitably, when the supercritical
fluid is carbon dioxide a pressure in the range of 100 to 350 bar may be used, preferably
the pressure being about 200 to 300 bar and more preferably being about 240 to 260
bar. Preferably, the temperature used is greater than about 35° Celsius, more preferably
in a range of about 35 to about 140° Celsius, and even more preferably in a range
of about 35 to about 90° Celsius.
[0018] Advantageously, the tobacco is placed in a closable chamber or bomb during the extraction
treatment thereof with the supercritical fluid.
[0019] Heating may be effected by heat transfer or by electromagnetic radiation (i.e. microwave
or radiofrequency heating). When electromagnetic radiation is used the closed chamber
or bomb will, of course, have to be made of a non-electromagnetic absorbing material,
e.g. non-metallic material, capable of withstanding the operating pressure. A suitable
such material may be comprised of a polyfluorohydrocarbon material, such as Teflon
(Trademark) for instance.
[0020] The technical effect of removing tobacco specific nitrosamines by processing of tobacco
with supercritical fluid was heretofore unknown. Much by preference the conditions
at which the extraction treatment of the tobacco with the supercritical fluid takes
place are biased towards extraction in the supercritical fluid of nitrosamines, as
compared with other tobacco specific compounds, such as nicotine for instance. Advantageously,
no or very little, nicotine is removed from the tobacco in the extraction medium.
Conditions which favour nitrosamine extraction (compared with nicotine extraction)
include a pH of the tobacco of less than about 6.5, and preferably less than about
5.5.
[0021] Preferably, the ratio of the percentage reduction in nitrosamines to the percentage
reduction in nicotine in tobacco, which tobacco has been subjected to the process
of the present invention, is in the range of about 1.1:1 to about 18:1, more preferably
about 1.3:1 to about 10:1, and even more preferably about 2:1 to about 6:1.
[0022] For a given set of treatment conditions, including, for example, the mass flow rate
of the extraction medium per unit mass of the tobacco, there will occur, after the
elapse of a time interval from commencement of the treatment process, a maximum difference
between the extraction of the (greater) percentage amount of nitrosamines and the
(lesser) percentage amount of nicotine. Thus it may be preferable to discontinue the
extraction treatment at or about this time.
[0023] A suitable mass flow rate of the supercritical fluid extraction medium per kg of
tobacco is in the range of about 1kg/h to about 55kg/h, and is dependent on the process
conditions, such as the tobacco packing density in the chamber and the size of the
chamber. Advantageously the mass flow rate of the supercritical fluid extraction medium
per kg of tobacco is in the range of 10 to 40kg/h, more advantageously is in the range
of 15 to 35kg/h and is even more advantageously about 30kg/h, although these figures
do depend on what the desired product characteristics are.
[0024] Advantageously, the tobacco treated in accordance with the process of the present
invention is cut tobacco, being cut lamina and/or cut stem tobacco. Alternatively,
or in addition, the tobacco may be one or more of whole leaf tobacco, tobacco dust
and reconstituted tobacco.
[0025] If deemed appropriate, the tobacco treated in accordance with the process of the
present invention may be subjected to a conditioning step, whereby the moisture content
of the tobacco, post-treatment, is brought to less than about 15%, preferably less
than 13%.
[0026] When it is the case that following treatment of tobacco with the supercritical fluid,
the nitrosamines are separated from the supercritical fluid extraction medium by subjecting
the medium to a nitrosamine removal process, preferably the medium flows around a
closed system.
[0027] Suitably, the closed system may comprise a first chamber, for the treatment of the
tobacco with supercritical fluid, and a second chamber in which the nitrosamine removal
process takes place, wherein the first and second chambers are interconnected by interconnecting
means, pipe(s) for example. Such system further comprises fluid transfer means operable
to cause the extraction medium to flow around the closed system. A nitrosamine removal
material such as an ion-exchange resin or adsorbent may reside in the second chamber,
such that supercritical fluid extraction medium, following treatment of the tobacco
therewith, is transferred via the interconnecting means to the second chamber, wherein
nitrosamines are totally or substantially removed. The supercritical fluid extraction
medium, minus nitrosamines, may then be returned to the tobacco in the first chamber.
[0028] Suitably, a plurality of interconnected chambers may be provided for the treatment
of the tobacco with supercritical fluid and/or a plurality of interconnected chambers
may be provided for the nitrosamine removal process. When it is the case that more
than one chamber is provided for either the treatment of the tobacco or the nitrosamine
removal process, or for both, the supercritical fluid may flow sequentially through
the chambers.
[0029] Alternatively, the closed system may comprise a first or single chamber having inlet
and outlet means wherein interconnecting means interconnect the inlet with the outlet
means of the chamber. Suitably, the interconnecting means may serve for the transfer
of supercritical fluid extraction medium, under the action of fluid transfer means,
from the outlet means of the chamber to and through a nitrosamine removal process
station to the inlet means of the chamber. Preferably, the amount of fluid in the
interconnecting means is kept to a minimum. A nitrosamine removal material, such as
an ion exchanger or an adsorbent, may be contained within any suitable permeable container
so as to provide a means by which fluid may pass through the container and a means
by which the tobacco is prevented from contact with the nitrosamine removal material.
[0030] Alternatively the nitrosamine removal process may, for instance, be constituted by
the transfer of the medium through a UV light source. In this instance, the interconnecting
means must be pervious to UV light.
[0031] Suitably, a plurality of interconnected chambers may be provided for the treatment
of the tobacco with supercritical fluid.
[0032] In addition to subjecting the tobacco to treatment with the supercritical fluid to
extract nitrosamines from the tobacco, the tobacco may be subjected to a microbial
deactivation process. As stated above microbes, including
Enterobacter agglomerans, Bacillus spp, Fusariurn equisetti, Cladosporium cladosporoides,
Altenaria alternata and
Acremonium arxii are thought to be responsible for or contribute to the production of nitrosamines
during curing of the tobacco. In fact, it is thought that microbes may also be a contributory
factor in the production of nitrosamines in tobacco during storage of cured tobacco.
Thus a reduction in microbial activity in the tobacco by way of the microbial deactivation
process reduces the likelihood of reformation of nitrosamines in the tobacco post-extraction
thereof. The microbial deactivation process may be carried out before or after subjecting
the tobacco to the treatment with the supercritical fluid. A further alternative is
to subject the tobacco to treatment with the supercritical fluid under microbial deactivating
conditions, such that microbial deactivation and extraction occur simultaneously.
[0033] Suitably, the microbial deactivation process may comprise a pasteurisation process,
wherein the tobacco is heated to a specified temperature and maintained at that temperature
for a set period of time. By way of example, the tobacco may be heated to a temperature
in the range of about 70° to about 150° Celsius for a period of between about 30 seconds
to about 2 minutes. The heating may be effected by, for example, convection heating
by way of contacting the tobacco with a gaseous heating medium, microwave heating
or radio frequency heating.
[0034] Suitably, the moisture content of the tobacco being subjected to the sterilisation
process is adjustable by way of either a pre- or a post-conditioning step.
[0035] Alternatively, the treatment of tobacco with, for example, ionising radiation, UV
radiation, freeze drying or an electron beam to kill microbes may be used as the microbial
deactivation process.
[0036] In addition to the treatment of the tobacco with the supercritical fluid to extract
nitrosamines from the tobacco, the tobacco may also be subjected to a nitrite/nitrate
removal process. Nitrites are important precursors of nitrosamines, whereas nitrates
are precursors of nitrites. It is thought that following nitrosamine removal residual
nitrites in the tobacco may be free to react with alkaloids also present in the tobacco
thus to re-form nitrosamines. The nitrite/nitrate removal process may suitably comprise
the steps of solvent extraction to remove the nitrites/nitrates from the tobacco,
followed by ion exchange to bind the nitrites/nitrates. Alternatively, the nitrites
may be removed by way of an oxidation step. In a yet further alternative, removal
of nitrites/nitrates using micro-organisms as disclosed in any one of GB 1 440 171,
GB 1 585 024, US 4709,710 or GB 2 014 031 may be used.
[0037] As with the microbial deactivation process, the nitrite/nitrate removal process may
be carried out before, after or during the treatment of the tobacco with the supercritical
fluid. When the nitrite/nitrate removal process is carried out simultaneously with
the treatment of the tobacco with the supercritical fluid, the process may in order
to remove nitrites from the tobacco comprise, for example, the step of either applying
ascorbic acid to the tobacco prior to treatment of the tobacco with the supercritical
fluid; incorporating ascorbic acid with the supercritical fluid; or, when an ion exchanger
or adsorbent material is present, incorporating ascorbic acid with the ion exchanger
or adsorbent. The ascorbic acid has the effect of scavenging nitrites from the tobacco.
[0038] The nitrite/nitrate removal process may be carried out as an alternative to or in
addition to the microbial deactivation process.
[0039] The inventive process provides a Burley tobacco having an initial nitrosamine content
after curing in the range of about 0.3 ppm - about 30 ppm, which after processing
has a nitrosamine content that is at least 45% lower. If the tobacco is a Burley tobacco
having a nitrosamine content of 5-6 ppm, after processing the content is preferably
3.6 ppm or less.
[0040] The inventive process also provides a Virginia tobacco having an initial moisture
content after curing of less than 8.5 ppm, which after processing has a nitrosamine
content that is at least 45% lower.
[0041] Preferably the Burley or Virginia processed tobacco have a nitrosamine content of
at least 60% lower than its original content.
[0042] The inventive process also provides a US blended tobacco having an original nicotine
content in the range of 0.10 - 2.0% and a nitrosamine content in the range of 0.10
- 1.2µg/g which after processing has a percentage decrease in nitrosamines to percentage
decrease in nicotine in the range of 1:1 to 10:1.
[0043] The inventive process also provides a Virginia blended tobacco having an original
nicotine content in the range of 0.30 - 2.15% and a nitrosamine content in the range
of 0.10 - 1.5 µg/g, which after processing has a percentage decrease in nitrosamines
to percentage decrease in nicotine in the range of 1:1 to 10:1.
[0044] Preferably the ratio is in the range of 5:1 or more, and more preferably 8:1 or more.
[0045] In order that the present invention may be clearly understood and readily carried
into effect reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying diagrammatic
drawing, in which:-
Figure 1 shows an apparatus for carrying out a process according to a first aspect
of the present invention; and
Figure 2 shows an apparatus for carrying out a process according to an alternative
aspect of the present invention.
[0046] The apparatus as shown in Figure 1 is a closed system comprising a first chamber
1 and a second chamber 2 wherein the first and second chambers 1, 2 are interconnected
by interconnecting pipes 3. The closed system further comprises fluid transfer means,
namely a pump 4. The apparatus further comprises a reservoir tank 5 interconnected
with the first chamber 1 via a duct 6. Valve 7 is located in duct 6 which valve 7
is operable to close the tank 5.
EXAMPLE 1
[0047] In operation of the Figure 1 apparatus, about 30kg of cut tobacco having a moisture
content of either about 14% or 25% (see Table 1) is placed in the first chamber 1,
the chamber having a volume of 1501. An ion exchanger, namely an acidic ion exchange
resin (as available from Bayer GmbH) having a weight of 4.4kg, is placed into the
second chamber 2, the chamber having a volume of 1501. The ion exchanger is mixed
with about 500g of solid potassium citrate granules. The reservoir tank 5 is charged
with carbon dioxide, which carbon dioxide is then pressurised by pump means (not shown)
and is transferred by the pump means from the reservoir tank 5 to the first and second
chambers 1, 2 and the interconnecting pipes 3 until the requisite extraction conditions
are achieved, namely a pressure of about 250 bar and a temperature of about 70° Celsius.
At this point the carbon dioxide reservoir tank is closed by closing valve 7. The
supercritical carbon dioxide is then circulated, under the action of the pump 4, through
the first chamber 1 (and, therefore, through the tobacco contained therein) and through
the second chamber 2 (and, therefore, through the ion exchange resin therein) via
the interconnecting pipes 3. The supercritical carbon dioxide extraction medium is
circulated about the closed system for a period of either 1.5 hours or 3 hours. Then
the first and second chambers 1, 2 are decompressed by opening vent means (not shown)
and the chambers are opened.
[0048] The nicotine and nitrosamine contents of the thus treated tobacco are then evaluated
using suitable standard laboratory tests.
[0049] Such a tobacco extraction process has been found to remove a substantial proportion
of tobacco specific nitrosamines from the treated tobacco. Table 1 discloses percentage
reductions in the tobacco of both nicotine and nitrosamines following treatment of
the tobacco as outlined above. The total amount of CO
2 used for these examples was 2190kg.
Table 1
| Run No. |
Tobacco m.c. |
Extraction Period (h) |
Nicotine Reduction (%) |
Nitrosamines Reduction (%) |
| 1 |
14% |
1.5 |
67 |
90 |
| 2 |
14% |
3.0 |
78.5 |
94 |
| 3 |
25% |
1.5 |
65.5 |
93.5 |
| 4 |
25% |
3.0 |
77 |
95 |
[0050] Treatment for 1.5 hours results in a greater difference between the percentage amount
of nitrosamines and the percentage amount of nicotine extracted, as compared with
treatment for 3 hours.
Example 2
[0051] It was believed that the extraction period outlined above could be reduced further
without substantially affecting the percentage reduction of nitrosamines, whilst further
reducing the percentage reduction of nicotine. For instance, the extraction period
may be between about 15 minutes to about 1.5 hours, preferably between about 20 minutes
to about 1 hour, more preferably between about 25 minutes to about 40 minutes and
even more preferably about 30 minutes.
[0052] The conditions of extraction are preferably further biased towards the extraction
in the supercritical fluid of nitrosamines, as compared with other tobacco specific
compounds, such as nicotine. Several other methods of biasing the extraction towards
nitrosamine removal, as compared with other tobacco specific compounds, may be.used
in addition to or separately from adjustment of the extraction period. For instance,
the pH of the tobacco may be maintained at less than about 6.5, preferably about 5.5.
In accordance with a further alternative, the supercritical fluid extraction medium
may be saturated, or substantially saturated, with tobacco specific compounds, or
commercially available chemical analogues thereof, other than nitrosamines before
contacting the extraction medium with the tobacco treatment. A yet further alternative,
when the supercritical fluid is carbon dioxide, may be to cool the tobacco to a temperature
below about 35°C, such that when the supercritical carbon dioxide is pumped into the
chamber containing the tobacco the general effectiveness of the extraction process
is reduced with preferential bias against the removal of tobacco specific compounds
other than nitrosamines. Biasing towards the extraction of nitrosamines may also be
effected by altering (i.e. increasing) the packing density of the tobacco in the extraction
chamber.
[0053] Furthermore, biasing may be effected by altering, i.e. lowering the mass flow rate
of the supercritical fluid extraction medium per unit mass of tobacco. For example,
reducing the flow rate of the supercritical fluid per kg of tobacco to less than 30
kg/h. Each of the above outlined methods of biasing the extraction towards nitrosamine
removal, as compared with other tobacco specific compounds, may be carried out separately
or in various combinations with one another.
[0054] As an optional addition to the above described process, the ion exchange resin situate
in the second chamber 2, following decompression of the closed system, is flushed
or washed with water. The washings are then treated with UV light from a UV light
source (not shown). Exposure of the washings to UV light results in the degradation
of nitrosamines in the washings. Extract(s) other than nitrosamines in the washings
is then re-incorporated with the tobacco. Other extract(s) may include, for example,
nicotine and/or flavour substances. In this way, the end result is that nitrosamines
are selectively removed from the tobacco, without adversely affecting the taste of
the tobacco.
[0055] Some examples of the above described variations are disclosed in Table 2 below.
[0056] In view of the variability of nicotine and nitrosamine contents in each batch of
tobacco, 300g from each batch was retained as a control for the batch. The nicotine
and nitrosamine levels for each control from the 4 batches sampled are given in Table
3 below.
TABLE 3
| Batch No. |
Nicotine Content (%) |
Nitrosamine Content (µg/g) |
| |
USB |
238 |
USB |
238 |
| 1 |
2.02 |
2.46 |
4.17 |
2.47 |
| 4 |
1.84 |
2.30 |
2.95 |
2.44 |
| 3 |
1.84 |
2.29 |
2.95 |
2.44 |
| 5 |
1.77 |
not reported yet |
3.32 |
not reported yet |
EXAMPLE 3
[0057] The apparatus shown in Figure 2 is also a closed system, which apparatus comprises
a chamber 1 provided with an inlet 8 and an outlet 9, interconnecting pipe 10, wherein
the pipe 10 interconnects the inlet 8 with the outlet 9 of the chamber 1, and fluid
transfer means, i.e. a pump 4. This apparatus further comprises a reservoir tank 5
interconnected with the chamber 1 via a duct 6. Valve 7 located in duct 6 allows for
tank 5 to be closed. Adjacent a position of the pipe 10 is located a UV light source.
[0058] In operation of the Figure 2 apparatus about 100kg of cut tobacco having an appropriate
moisture content is placed into chamber 1. The reservoir tank 5 is charged with carbon
dioxide, which carbon dioxide is then pressurised by pump means (not shown) and is
transferred by the pump means from the reservoir tank 5 to the chamber 1 and pipe
10 until the requisite extraction conditions are achieved, namely a pressure of about
250 bar and a temperature of about 50° Celsius. Then the tank 5 is closed by closing
the valve 6. The supercritical carbon dioxide is then circulated, under the action
of the pump 4, through the chamber 1 (and, therefore, through the tobacco contained
therein) and through the pipe 10. The UV light source 11 irradiates the supercritical
carbon dioxide extraction medium in the pipe 10. Thus, nitrosamines in the supercritical
carbon dioxide are degraded. Degradation products thereof may then be removed, for
instance by passing the supercritical carbon dioxide through a metal mesh (not shown).
The pipe 10 is comprised of, at least in the region of the UV light source 11, material
which is pervious to UV light, e.g. a high pressure quartz window. The amount of supercritical
carbon dioxide in the interconnecting pipe 10 is kept to a minimum by use of a pipe
10 having a bore of a small diameter (i.e. a diameter of about 1cm). The supercritical
carbon dioxide is, following exposure to the UV light, returned to the chamber 1 and
again into contact with the tobacco therein. The supercritical carbon dioxide is circulated
for a period of 30 minutes. Then the chamber 1 and the pipe 10 are decompressed by
opening vent means (not shown). The tobacco treated in this way is free, or substantially
free, of nitrosamines, whilst the nicotine content of the tobacco remained substantially
the same pre- and post-treatment.
[0059] A further alternative apparatus (not shown) comprises substantially the apparatus
shown in Figure 2 with a nitrosamine removal material held within a fluid permeable
container in the chamber 1. The fluid may be re-circulated through the system for
a number of times before removal and optional subsequent removal of nitrosamines therefrom.
1. A tobacco treatment process wherein tobacco having a pH of less than 6.5 is subjected
to treatment with a supercritical fluid extraction medium to extract nitrosamines
from said tobacco, said tobacco being one or more of cut tobacco, whole leaf tobacco,
tobacco dust and reconstituted tobacco.
2. A process according to Claim 1, whereby said nitrosamines are separated from said
supercritical fluid extraction medium by subjecting said extraction medium to a nitrosamine
removal process.
3. A process according to Claim 2, wherein said nitrosamine removal process comprises
a chemisorption step.
4. A process according to Claim 3, wherein said chemisorption step comprises the use
of an ion exchanger.
5. A process according to Claim 2, wherein said nitrosamine removal process comprises
an adsorbent step.
6. A process according to Claim 5, wherein an adsorbent of said adsorbent step is selected
from one or more of the group consisting of glass beads, activated charcoal, aluminium
silicate and zeolites.
7. A process according to Claim 2, wherein said nitrosamine removal process comprises
treatment of said extraction medium with ultraviolet (UV) light.
8. A process according to Claim 2, wherein said nitrosamine removal process comprises
either precipitation of said nitrosamines from said extraction medium, or subjecting
said extraction medium to nitrosamine-specific enzyme breakdown, or chromatographic
separation of said nitrosamines from said extraction medium.
9. A process according to any one of Claims 2-8, wherein said nitrosamine removal process
comprises a plurality of removal processes.
10. A process according to any one of Claims 2-9, wherein following said nitrosamine removal
process, said extraction medium, being wholly or substantially free of said nitrosamines,
is brought into contact with the tobacco, such that extract(s) other than nitrosamines
in said extraction medium may be incorporated or re-incorporated with said tobacco.
11. A process according to Claim 10, wherein said extract(s) comprise nicotine and/or
flavour substances.
12. A process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said supercritical
fluid extraction medium is supercritical carbon dioxide.
13. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein an acid is added to
said tobacco prior to treatment of said tobacco with said supercritical fluid; or
to said supercritical fluid prior to treatment of said tobacco with said supercritical
fluid.
14. A process according to any one of Claims 4 or 5 when appended to Claim 3, wherein
an acid is added to the ion exchanger or adsorbent.
15. A process according to any one of Claims 1-14, wherein one or more of an organic solvent
or an alcohol is added in addition to, or alternatively of, said acid.
16. A process according to Claim 15, wherein said acid is an organic acid.
17. A process according to Claim 16, wherein said acid is an organic acid selected from
one or more of the group consisting of malonic acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid,
glutaric acid, adipic acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, mucic acid and citric acid,
or a salt derivative thereof.
18. A process according to Claim 17, wherein said organic acid is a citric acid salt.
19. A process according to Claim 18, wherein said citric acid salt is potassium citrate.
20. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said extraction of
said nitrosamines from said tobacco with said supercritical fluid takes place at an
elevated pressure and temperature.
21. A process according to Claim 20, wherein when supercritical fluid is supercritical
carbon dixoide, said pressure is in the range of 100 to 350 bar.
22. A process according to Claim 21, wherein said pressure is about 200 to 300 bar.
23. A process according to Claim 22, wherein said pressure is about 240 to 260 bar.
24. A process according to any one of Claims 20-23, wherein said temperature is greater
than about 35°Celsius.
25. A process according to Claim 24, wherein said temperature is in a range of about 35°
to about 140° Celsius.
26. A process according to Claim 25, wherein said temperature is in a range of about 35°
to about 90° Celsius.
27. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said tobacco is placed
in a closable chamber or bomb during said extraction treatment thereof with supercritical
fluid.
28. A process according to any one of Claims 20 to 27, wherein said elevated temperature
is effected by heat transfer or by electromagnetic radiation.
29. A process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein no, or very little,
nicotine is removed from said tobacco in said extraction medium.
30. A process according to Claim 1, wherein said pH of said acid is less than about 5.5.
31. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the ratio of the percentage
reduction in nitrosamines to the percentage reduction in nicotine is in the range
of about 1.1:1 to about 18:1.
32. A process according to Claim 31, wherein said ratio is in the range of about 1.3:1
to about 10:1.
33. A process according to Claim 32, wherein said ratio is in the range of about 2:1 to
about 6:1.
34. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein a suitable mass flow
rate of said supercritical fluid extraction medium per kg of tobacco is about 1-55kg/h.
35. A process according to Claim 34, wherein said mass flow rate is in the range of 10-40
kg/hr.
36. A process according to Claim 35, wherein said mass flow rate is in the range of 15-35
kg/hr.
37. A process according to Claim 36, wherein said mass flow rate is about 30 kg/h.
38. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said tobacco is subjected
to a microbial deactivation process.
39. A process according to Claim 38, wherein said microbial deactivation process comprises
a pasteurisation process.
40. A process according to Claim 39, wherein said tobacco is heated to a temperature in
the range of about 70°C to about 150°C for a period of between 30 seconds to 2 minutes.
41. A process according to Claim 39, wherein said pasteurisation process is effected by
heating of said tobacco by convection heating by way of contacting said tobacco with
a gaseous heating medium, by microwave heating or by radio frequency heating.
42. A process according to any one of Claims 38-41, wherein the moisture content of said
tobacco being subjected to said microbial deactivation process is adjustable by way
of either a pre- or post- conditioning step.
43. A process according to Claim 38, wherein said microbial deactivation process comprises
use of ionising radiation, UV radiation, freeze drying or an electron beam.
44. A process according to any one of Claims 1-43, wherein said tobacco is subjected to
nitrite/nitrate removal process, before, during or after treatment of said tobacco
with said supercritical fluid.
45. A process according to Claim 44, wherein said nitrite/nitrate removal process comprises
the steps of solvent extraction to remove nitrites/nitrates from said tobacco followed
by ion exchange to bind said nitrites/nitrates.
46. A process according to Claim 44; wherein said nitrite removal process comprises an
oxidation step or use of micro-organisms.
47. A process according to any one of Claims 44-46, wherein ascorbic acid is applied to
said tobacco, incorporated with said supercritical fluid, or incorporated with a chemisorption
medium.
1. Tabakverarbeitungsverfahren, worin Tabak mit einem pH-Wert von weniger als 6,5 einer
Behandlung mit einem superkritischen Fluid als Extraktionsmedium unterworfen wird,
um Nitrosamine aus dem Tabak zu extrahieren, wobei der Tabak eines oder mehrere darstellt
von geschnittenem Tabak, Gesamtblatttabak, Tabakstaub und rekonstituiertem Tabak.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, worin die Nitrosamine von dem superkritischen Fluid als
Extraktionsmedium getrennt werden, indem man das Extraktionsmedium einem Nitrosamin-Entfernungsprozess
unterwirft.
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, worin der Nitrosamin-Entfernungsprozess einen Chemisorptionsschritt
umfasst.
4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, worin der Chemisorptionsschritt die Verwendung eines Ionenaustauschers
umfasst.
5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, worin der Nitrosamin-Entfernungsprozess einen Adsorptionsschritt
umfasst.
6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 5, worin ein Adsorptionsmittel des Adsorptionsschrittes ausgewählt
ist unter einem oder mehreren der Gruppe, bestehend aus Glaskügelchen, Aktivkohle,
Aluminiumsilicat und Zeoliten.
7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, worin der Nitrosamin-Entfernungsprozess die Behandlung
des Extraktionsmediums mit ultraviolettem (UV) Licht umfasst.
8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, worin der Nitrosamin-Entfernungsprozess entweder die Ausfällung
der Nitrosamine aus dem Extraktionsmedium oder das Unterwerfen des Extraktionsmediums
unter einen Nitrosamin-spezifischen enzymatischen Abbau oder die chromatographische
Trennung der Nitrosamine von dem Extraktionsmedium umfasst.
9. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 2-8, worin der Nitrosamin-Entfernungsprozess eine
Vielzahl von Entfernungsprozessen umfasst.
10. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 2-9, worin nach dem Nitrosamin-Entfernungsprozess
das Extraktionsmedium, das vollständig oder im Wesentlichen frei von Nitrosaminen
ist, mit dem Tabak in Kontakt gebracht wird, so dass andere Extrakt(e) als Nitrosamine
in dem Extraktionsmedium in den Tabak eingearbeitet oder wieder eingearbeitet werden
können.
11. Verfahren nach Anspruch 10, worin der oder die Extrakt(e) Nikotin und/oder Aromasubstanzen
(Flavor) umfassen.
12. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, worin das superkritische Fluid als
Extraktionsmedium superkritisches Kohlendioxid ist.
13. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, worin eine Säure dem Tabak vor der
Behandlung des Tabaks mit superkritischem Fluid oder dem superkritischen Fluid vor
der Behandlung des Tabaks mit dem superkritischen Fluid zugesetzt wird.
14. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 4 oder 5, wenn abhängig von Anspruch 3, worin dem
Ionenaustauscher oder Adsorptionsmittel eine Säure zugesetzt wird.
15. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1-14, worin eines oder mehrere von einem organischen
Lösungsmittel oder einem Alkohol zusätzlich oder alternativ zur Säure zugesetzt wird.
16. Verfahren nach Anspruch 15, worin die Säure eine organische Säure ist.
17. Verfahren nach Anspruch 16, worin die Säure eine organische Säure darstellt, ausgewählt
aus einer oder mehreren der Gruppe, bestehend aus Malonsäure, Ascorbinsäure, Bernsteinsäure,
Glutarsäure, Adipinsäure, Äpfelsäure, Weinsäure, Mucinsäure und Zitronensäure oder
einem Salzderivat derselben.
18. Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, worin die organische Säure ein Zitronensäuresalz ist.
19. Verfahren nach Anspruch 18, worin das Zitronensäuresalz Kaliumcitrat ist.
20. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, worin die Extraktion der Nitrosamine
aus dem Tabak mit dem superkritischen Fluid bei erhöhtem Druck und Temperatur abläuft.
21. Verfahren nach Anspruch 20, worin dann, wenn das superkritische Fluid superkritisches
Kohlendioxid ist, der Druck im Bereich von 100 bis 350 bar liegt.
22. Verfahren nach Anspruch 21, worin der Druck etwa 200 bis 300 bar beträgt.
23. Verfahren nach Anspruch 22, worin der Druck etwa 240 bis 260 bar beträgt.
24. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 20-23, worin die Temperatur größer als etwa 35
°C ist.
25. Verfahren nach Anspruch 24, worin die Temperatur in einem Bereich von etwa 35 °C bis
etwa 140 °C liegt.
26. Verfahren nach Anspruch 25, worin die Temperatur in einem Bereich von etwa 35 °C bis
etwa 90 °C liegt.
27. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, worin der Tabak während der Extraktionsbehandlung
desselben mit superkritischem Fluid in eine verschließbare Kammer oder Bombe eingebracht
wird.
28. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 20-27, worin die erhöhte Temperatur mittels Wärmetransfer
oder mittels elektromagnetischer Strahlung bewirkt wird.
29. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, worin kein oder sehr wenig Nikotin
aus dem Tabak in das Extraktionsmedium entfernt wird.
30. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, worin der pH-Wert der Säure unterhalb von etwa 5,5 liegt.
31. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, worin das Verhältnis der prozentualen
Verringerung an Nitrosaminen zur prozentualen Verringerung an Nikotin im Bereich von
etwa 1,1:1 bis etwa 18:1 1 liegt.
32. Verfahren nach Anspruch 31, worin das Verhältnis in dem Bereich von etwa 1,3:1 bis
etwa 10:1 liegt.
33. Verfahren nach Anspruch 32, worin das Verhältnis im Bereich von etwa 2:1 bis etwa
6:1 liegt.
34. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, worin eine geeignete Massenströmungsrate
des superkritischen Fluids als Extraktionsmedium pro kg an Tabak etwa 1 - 55 kg/h
beträgt.
35. Verfahren nach Anspruch 34, worin die Massenströmungsrate im Bereich von etwa 10 -
40 kg/h liegt.
36. Verfahren nach Anspruch 35, worin die Massenströmungsrate in dem Bereich von 15 -
35 kg/h liegt.
37. Verfahren nach Anspruch 36, worin die Massenströmungsrate etwa 30 kg/h beträgt.
38. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, worin der Tabak einem Mikroben-Desaktivierungsprozess
unterworfen wird.
39. Verfahren nach Anspruch 38, worin der Mikroben-Desaktivierungsprozess einen Pasteurisierungsprozess
umfasst.
40. Verfahren nach Anspruch 39, worin der Tabak für eine Zeitspanne zwischen 30 Sekunden
bis 2 Minuten auf eine Temperatur im Bereich von etwa 70 °C bis etwa 150 °C erwärmt
wird.
41. Verfahren nach Anspruch 39, worin der Pasteurisierungsprozess durch Erwärmen des Tabaks
mittels Konvektionswärme durch In-Kontakt-Bringen des Tabaks mit einem gasförmigen
Heizmedium, durch Mikrowellenerwärmung oder mittels Radiofrequenzerwärmung bewirkt
wird.
42. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 38-41, worin der Feuchtigkeitsgehalt des Tabaks,
der dem Mikroben-Desaktivierungsprozesses unterworfen wird, mit Hilfe entweder eines
Vor- oder eines Nachkonditionierungsschrittes einstellbar ist
43. Verfahren nach Anspruch 38, worin der Mikroben-Desaktivierungsprozess die Verwendung
von ionisierender Strahlung, UV-Strahlung, Gefriertrocknung oder eines Elektronenstrahls
umfasst.
44. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1-43, worin der Tabak vor, während oder nach der
Behandlung des Tabaks mit dem superkritischen Fluid einem Nitrit/Nitrat-Entfernungsprozess
unterworfen wird.
45. Verfahren nach Anspruch 44, worin der Nitrit/Nitrat-Entfernungsprozess die Schritte
der Lösungsmittelextraktion zur Entfernung von Nitriten/Nitraten aus dem Tabak, gefolgt
von Ionenaustausch zur Bindung der Nitrite/Nitrate, umfasst.
46. Verfahren nach Anspruch 44, worin der Nitrit-Entfernungsprozess einen Oxidationsschritt
oder die Verwendung von Mikroorganismen umfasst.
47. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 44-46, worin Ascorbinsäure auf den Tabak angewandt,
mit dem superkritischen Fluid eingearbeitet oder mit einem Chemisorptionsmedium eingearbeitet
wird.
1. Procédé de traitement du tabac, dans lequel du tabac ayant un pH inférieur à 6,5 est
soumis à un traitement avec un milieu d'extraction par fluide supercritique afin d'extraire
les nitrosamines dudit tabac, ledit tabac étant un ou plusieurs parmi du tabac coupé,
du tabac en feuilles entières, de la poussière de tabac et du tabac reconstitué.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel lesdites nitrosamines sont séparées
dudit milieu d'extraction par fluide supercritique en soumettant ledit milieu d'extraction
à un procédé d'enlèvement de nitrosamines.
3. Procédé selon la revendication 2, dans lequel ledit procédé d'enlèvement de nitrosamines
comprend une étape.de chimisorption.
4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, dans lequel ladite étape de chimisorption comprend
l'utilisation d'un échangeur d'ions.
5. Procédé selon la revendication 2. dans lequel ledit procédé d'enlèvement de nitrosamines
comprend une étape d'adsorption.
6. Procédé selon la revendication 5, dans lequel un adsorbant de ladite étape d'adsorption
est choisi parmi un ou plusieurs de ceux du groupe constitué par des billes de verre,
du charbon de bois activé, du silicate d'aluminium et des zéolithes.
7. Procédé selon la revendication 2, dans lequel ledit procédé d'enlèvement de nitrosamines
comprend le traitement dudit milieu d'extraction avec de la lumière ultraviolette
(UV).
8. Procédé selon la revendication 2, dans lequel ledit procédé d'enlèvement de nitrosamines
comprend la précipitation desdites nitrosamines à partir dudit milieu d'extraction
ou bien la soumission dudit milieu d'extraction à une dégradation enzymatique spécifique
aux nitrosamines ou bien une séparation chromatographique desdites nitrosamines à
partir dudit milieu d'extraction.
9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 8, dans lequel ledit procédé
d'enlèvement de nitrosamines comprend une pluralité de procédés d'enlèvement.
10. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 9, dans lequel, après ledit
procédé d'enlèvement de nitrosamines, ledit milieu d'extraction complètement ou pratiquement
exempt desdites nitrosamines est mis en contact avec le tabac de façon à pouvoir incorporer
ou réincorporer dans ledit tabac un ou des extraits autres que les nitrosamines présentes
dans ledit milieu d'extraction.
11. Procédé selon la revendication 10, dans lequel le ou lesdits extraits comprennent
de la nicotine et/ou des substances aromatisantes.
12. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel ledit milieu
d'extraction par fluide supercritique est le dioxyde de carbone supercritique.
13. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel un acide
est ajouté audit tabac avant le traitement dudit tabac avec ledit fluide supercritique
; ou audit fluide supercritique avant le traitement dudit tabac avec ledit fluide
supercritique.
14. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 4 ou 5 en liaison avec la revendication
3, dans lequel un acide est ajouté à l'échangeur d'ions ou à l'adsorbant.
15. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 14, dans lequel un ou plusieurs
parmi un solvant organique ou un alcool sont ajoutés en plus ou en variante dudit
acide.
16. Procédé selon la revendication 15, dans lequel ledit acide est un acide organique.
17. Procédé selon la revendication 16, dans lequel ledit acide est un acide organique
choisi parmi un ou plusieurs de ceux du groupe constitué par l'acide malonique, l'acide
ascorbique, l'acide succinique, l'acide glutarique, l'acide adipique, l'acide malique,
l'acide tartrique, l'acide mucique et l'acide citrique, ou un sel dérivé de ceux-ci.
18. Procédé selon la revendication 17, dans lequel ledit acide organique est un sel de
l'acide citrique.
19. Procédé selon la revendication 18, dans lequel ledit sel de l'acide citrique est le
citrate de potassium.
20. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel ladite
extraction desdites nitrosamines provenant dudit tabac avec ledit fluide supercritique
se fait sous une pression et à une température élevées.
21. Procédé selon la revendication 20. dans lequel, lorsque le fluide supercritique est
le dioxyde de carbone supercritique, ladite pression se situe dans la plage de 100
à 350 bars.
22. Procédé selon la revendication 21, dans lequel ladite pression se situe dans la plage
de 200 à 300 bars environ.
23. Procédé selon la revendication 22, dans lequel ladite pression se situe dans la plage
de 240 à 260 bars environ.
24. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 20 à 23, dans lequel ladite température
est supérieure à 35° Celsius environ.
25. Procédé selon la revendication 24, dans lequel ladite température se situe dans une
plage de 35° environ à 140° Celsius environ.
26. Procédé selon la revendication 25, dans lequel ladite température se situe dans une
plage de 35° environ à 90° Celsius environ.
27. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel ledit tabac
est placé dans une chambre ou bombe fermable lors dudit traitement d'extraction de
celui-ci avec le fluide supercritique.
28. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 20 à 27, dans lequel ladite température
élevée est obtenue par un transfert de chaleur ou par un rayonnement électromagnétique.
29. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel très peu
ou pas de nicotine est enlevée dudit tabac dans ledit milieu d'extraction.
30. Procédé selon la revendication 1. dans lequel ledit pH dudit acide est inférieur à
5,5 environ.
31. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le ratio
de la réduction en pourcentage des nitrosamines sur la réduction en pourcentage de
la nicotine se situe dans la plage de 1,1:1 environ à 18:1 environ.
32. Procédé selon la revendication 31, dans lequel ledit ratio se situe dans la plage
de 1,3:1 environ à 10:1 environ.
33. Procédé selon la revendication 32. dans lequel ledit ratio se situe dans la plage
de 2:1 environ à 6:1 environ.
34. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel un débit
massique approprié dudit milieu d'extraction par fluide supercritique par kg de tabac
est de 1 à 55 kg/h environ.
35. Procédé selon la revendication 34, dans lequel ledit débit massique se situe dans
la plage de 10 à 40 kg/h.
36. Procédé selon la revendication 35, dans lequel ledit débit massique se situe dans
la plage de 15 à 35 kg/h.
37. Procédé selon la revendication 36, dans lequel ledit débit massique est de 30 kg/h
environ.
38. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel ledit tabac
est soumis à un procédé de désactivation microbienne.
39. Procédé selon la revendication 38. dans lequel ledit procédé de désactivation microbienne
comprend un procédé de pasteurisation.
40. Procédé selon la revendication 39, dans lequel ledit tabac est chauffé à une température
dans la plage de 70°C environ à 150°C environ pendant une durée allant de 30 secondes
à 2 minutes.
41. Procédé selon la revendication 39, dans lequel ledit procédé de pasteurisation s'effectue
en chauffant ledit tabac par chauffage par convection, en mettant le tabac en contact
avec un milieu chauffant gazeux, par chauffage à micro-ondes ou par chauffage à haute
fréquence.
42. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 38 à 41, dans lequel la teneur en
humidité dudit tabac soumis audit procédé de désactivation microbienne peut être ajustée
au moyen d'une étape de pré-conditionnement ou de post-conditionnement.
43. Procédé selon la revendication 38, dans lequel ledit procédé de désactivation microbienne
comprend l'utilisation d'un rayonnement ionisant, d'un rayonnement UV, d'une cryodessiccation
ou d'un faisceau d'électrons.
44. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 43, dans lequel ledit tabac
est soumis à un procédé d'enlèvement des nitrites/nitrates avant, pendant ou après
le traitement dudit tabac avec ledit fluide supercritique.
45. Procédé selon la revendication 44, dans lequel ledit procédé d'enlèvement des nitrites/nitrates
comprend les étapes d'extraction par solvant pour enlever les nitrites/ nitrates dudit
tabac, suivie d'un échange d'ions pour lier lesdits nitrites/nitrates.
46. Procédé selon la revendication 44, dans lequel ledit procédé d'enlèvement des nitrites
comprend une étape d'oxydation ou l'utilisation de micro-organismes.
47. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 44 à 46, dans lequel de l'acide
ascorbique est appliqué sur ledit tabac, incorporé audit fluide supercritique ou incorporé
à un milieu de chimisorption.
