BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to an insulator and to an insulator apparatus comprising
a plurality of insulators connected vertically in series.
Description of the Related Art
[0002] A certain type of insulator has a disklike shed portion and a plurality of annular
rib portions concentrically formed on the underside of the shed portion and projecting
downward along respectively predetermined lengths; and a certain type of insulator
apparatus is configured such that a plurality of the insulators are connected vertically
in series. An insulator and an insulator apparatus are adapted to hang a transmission
line or the like on a steel tower or an electric pole. In order to cope with recent
tendency toward super-high transmission voltage, the size of an insulator itself is
increased, or the number of insulators to be connected is increased so as to increase
the size of an insulator apparatus.
[0003] At the site of installation, the above-mentioned insulator and insulator apparatus
are exposed to wind, and may generate a loud noise at a certain wind velocity or wind
direction. As the size of an insulator or insulator apparatus increases, the insulator
or insulator apparatus generates noise at more times and at higher noise level.
[0004] Particularly, frequent generation of a loud noise at night bothers local residents,
and thus various noise control measures have been proposed and employed. Noise control
measures in relation to an insulator are proposed in Japanese Patent Publication (
kokoku) No. 06-101261 (first publication) and Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (
kokai) No. 05-67407 (second publication). Noise control measures in relation to an insulator
apparatus are proposed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (
kokai) Nos. 2000-149686 (third publication) and 2000-311531 (fourth publication).
[0005] The first and second publications describe a noise control measure applied to an
insulator itself; specifically, the publications specify the shape of rib portions
formed concentrically on the underside of a disklike shed portion. According to the
first publication, the outermost rib portion and the next inner rib portion are configured
such that a straight line tangent to the ends of the rib portions forms an angle of
at least 35 degrees with respect to the horizontal direction. According to the second
publication, the end portion of the outermost rib portion is formed into a wavy shape
consisting of crests and troughs.
[0006] The third and fourth publications describe a noise control measure applied to an
insulator apparatus having a plurality of insulators connected vertically in series.
According to the third publication, a string of insulators consists of heterogeneous
insulators of different natural frequencies. According to the fourth publication,
a string of insulators is configured such that insulators are arranged at different
intervals each other.
[0007] These insulators and insulator apparatus each have a noise control mechanism. These
noise control mechanisms are based on the technical idea of "wind noise generation
mechanism of insulator," and do not necessarily provide sufficient control over noise.
According to the conventional "wind noise generation mechanism of insulator, " wind
causes generation of a Karman vortex between rib portions of an insulator; the thus-generated
Karman vortex induces micro-vibration of the rib portions; and the frequency of micro-vibration
coincides with the natural frequency of a shed portion of the insulator to thereby
generate wind noise.
[0008] The inventors of the present invention carried out extensive studies and found the
following: in an insulator having a disklike shed portion and a plurality of annular
rib portions concentrically formed on the underside of the shed portion and projecting
downward along respectively predetermined lengths, when non-turbulent wind blows along
a straight line tangent to the end of the first rib portion located outermost and
to that of the second rib portion located inside and adjacent to the first rib portion,
a Karman vortex is generated between rib portions, and ribs repeatedly undergo micro-vibration,
thereby generating a slight noise; the frequency of micro-vibration induced by a Karman
vortex is determined by wind velocity and an interval between rib portions; when wind
blows continuously at a certain velocity, the frequency of micro-vibration induced
by a Karman vortex coincides with the acoustic natural frequency of a space provided
between adjacent insulators of an insulator apparatus; and these phenomena generate
resonance, thus leading to generation of a loud noise.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] An object of the present invention is to implement, on the basis of the above-mentioned
findings , noise control measures applied to the above-described insulator and the
above-described insulator apparatus.
[0010] The present invention is directed to an insulator and to an insulator apparatus,
and is more particularly applied to an insulator having a disklike shed portion and
a plurality of annular rib portions concentrically formed on the underside of the
shed portion and projecting downward along respectively predetermined lengths, and
to an insulator apparatus configured such that a plurality of the insulators are connected
vertically in series.
[0011] An insulator according to the present invention is the above-described insulator
characterized in that among the rib portions, a first rib portion located outermost
is the longest; a second rib portion located inside and adjacent to the first rib
portion is shorter than the first rib portion; a third rib portion located inside
and adjacent to the second rib portion assumes a length such that the third rib portion
intersects a straight line tangent to the end of the first rib portion and to that
of the second rib portion; and a fourth rib portion located inside and adjacent to
the third rib portion assumes a length such that the fourth rib portion intersects
a straight line tangent to the end of the first rib portion and to that of the third
rib portion.
[0012] An insulator apparatus according to the present invention is the above-described
insulator apparatus characterized in that a D/H ratio is not greater than 0.7, where
D is a radius of the shed portion of each of the insulators, and H is a distance between
lower ends of adjacent insulators.
[0013] In the insulator according to the present invention, when non-turbulent wind blows
along a straight line tangent to the end of the first rib portion located outermost
and to that of the second rib portion located inside and adjacent to the first rib
portion, the wind impinges against an end part of the third rib portion and is reflected,
and the reflected wind disturbs air flow present between the first rib portion and
the second rib portion, which air flow would otherwise allow generation of a Karman
vortex. Thus, there can be prevented generation of a Karman vortex between the first
rib portion and the second rib portion.
[0014] When non-turbulent wind blows along a straight line tangent to the end of the first
rib portion and to that of the third rib portion, the wind impinges against an end
part of the fourth rib portion and is reflected, and the reflected wind disturbs air
flow present between the first rib portion and the third rib portion, which air flow
would otherwise allow generation of a Karman vortex. Thus, there can be prevented
generation of a Karman vortex between the first rib portion and the third rib portion.
[0015] Therefore, the insulator according to the present invention is completely or substantially
free from generation of micro-vibration to be induced by a Karman vortex generated
between rib portions; in other words, the insulator can control generation of a Karman
vortex, which is a factor to induce noise, thereby preventing generation of noise
from the same and from an insulator apparatus.
[0016] In the case of an insulator having a fifth rib portion and a rib portion located
inside the fifth rib portion, since these rib portions are located a considerable
distance from the outermost, first rib portion, and the diameters of the rib portions
are small, a Karman vortex is seldom generated between the first rib portion and either
of these rib portions, or, when generated, such a Karman vortex is of low magnitude.
Therefore, no particular preventive means is required for preventing generation of
a Karman vortex between the first rib portion and either of these rib portions.
[0017] An insulator apparatus to which the present invention is to be applied usually assumes
a D/H ratio of 0.8-1.3, where D is the radius of the shed portion of each of insulators,
and H is the distance between the lower ends of adjacent insulators. As a result,
such an insulator apparatus often exhibits a phenomenon such that, in a string of
insulators, the acoustic natural frequency of a space provided between adjacent insulators
coincides with the frequency of micro-vibration induced by a Karman vortex generated
between rib portions of each insulator.
[0018] By contrast, the insulator apparatus according to the present invention assumes a
D/H ratio not greater than 0.7, thereby avoiding the coincidence between the acoustic
natural frequency of a space provided between adjacent insulators and the frequency
of micro-vibration induced by a Karman vortex generated between rib portions of each
insulator.
[0019] Therefore, in the case of the insulator apparatus according to the present invention,
even when a Karman vortex is generated between rib portions with resultant generation
of micro-vibration, there can be prevented generation of a loud noise, which would
otherwise result from the coincidence between the frequency of micro-vibration and
the acoustic natural frequency of a space provided between adjacent insulators.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0020]
FIG. 1 is a partially sectional side view of a conventional insulator to which the
present invention is applied;
FIG. 2 is a partially sectional side view of an insulator according to an embodiment
of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a side view of a conventional insulator apparatus to which the present invention
is applied;
FIG. 4 is a side view of an insulator apparatus according to an embodiment of the
present invention;
FIG. 5 is a side view of an insulator apparatus according to another embodiment of
the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between wind velocity and noise level obtained
from an wind tunnel test on a conventional insulator;
FIG. 7 is a graph showing the relationship between wind velocity and noise level obtained
from an wind tunnel test on another conventional insulator;
FIG. 8 is a graph showing the relationship between wind velocity and noise level obtained
from an wind tunnel test on an insulator according to the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a schematic view showing the method of an acoustic resonance test; and
FIG. 10 is a graph showing the relationship between D/H ratio and distinguished level
obtained from an acoustic resonance test on insulator apparatus.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0021] A noise-controlled insulator according to a first aspect of the present invention
is applicable to an insulator having a disklike shed portion and a plurality of annular
rib portions formed concentrically on the underside of the shed portion and projecting
downward along respectively predetermined lengths. FIG. 1 shows a conventional, typical
insulator 10 of the above-described type, and FIG. 2 shows an insulator 20 according
to an embodiment of the present invention. The insulator 10 or 20 includes an insulator
body 10a or 20a, a metallic cap 10b or 20b, and a metallic pin 10c or 20c.
[0022] The insulator body 10a or 20a is formed of porcelain or glass and includes a disklike
shed portion 11 or 21; an annular connection portion 12 or 22 projecting from a central
part of the shed portion 11 or 12 toward the front side of the shed portion 11 or
12; and a plurality of rib portions 13a-13e or 23a-23e formed concentrically on the
backside of the shed portion 11 or 21.
[0023] Assuming a substantially annular form, the metallic cap 10b or 20b has an engagement
recess 14a or 24a formed at a central part of the same and opening downward, and a
connection recess 14b or 24b formed at a crest part of the same. The metallic cap
10b or 20b is fitted onto an outer circumference of the connection portion 12 or 22
of the shed portion 11 or 21 of the insulator body 10a or 20a and is securely fixed
to the connection portion 12 or 22 by use of a cement 15b or 25b.
[0024] The metallic pin 10c or 20c includes a rod-shaped columnar body 16a or 26a, a large
diameter attachment portion 16b or 26b formed at the upper end of the columnar body
16a or 26a, and a large diameter attachment portion 16c or 26c formed at the lower
end of the columnar body 16a or 26a. The metallic pin 10c or 20c is concentrically
inserted from the attachment portion 16b or 26b into a cavity 12a or 22a formed in
the connection portion 12 or 22 of the shed portion 11 or 21 of the insulator body
10a or 20a and is securely fixed to the connection portion 12 or 22 by use of a cement
15a or 25a.
[0025] The metallic pin 10c or 20c is concentrically inserted from the attachment portion
16c or 26c into the recess 14b or 24b of the metallic cap 10b or 20b and is engaged
with an end portion of the recess 14b or 24b, thereby being connected to the metallic
cap 10b or 20b. In this manner, the metallic pins 10c or 20c are used to vertically
connect the insulator bodies 10a or 20a in series , thereby configuring an insulator
apparatus.
[0026] The insulator body 10a or 20a of each insulator 10 or 20 includes five annular rib
portions 13a-13e or 23a-23e. The rib portions 13a-13e or 23a-23e project downward
from the underside of the shed portion 11 or 21 along respectively predetermined lengths.
[0027] In the conventional insulator 10, the rib portions 13a-13e of the insulator body
10a are arranged in the following manner: the outermost rib portion 13a (first rib
portion), the rib portion 13b (second rib portion), the rib portion 13c (third rib
portion), the rib portion 13d (fourth rib portion), and the rib portion 13e (fifth
rib portion) are arranged sequentially inward in the descending order of length.
[0028] By contrast, in the insulator 20 according to an embodiment of the present invention,
the rib portions 23a-23e of the insulator body 20a are arranged in the following manner:
the outermost rib portion 23a (first rib portion) is the longest; the innermost rib
portion 23e (fifth rib portion) is the shortest; the intermediate rib portions 23b
(second rib portion), 23c (third rib portion), and 23d (fourth rib portion) located
between the rib portions 23a and 23e assume substantially the same length; and the
length relationship described below is established among the rib portions 23a-23e.
[0029] In the insulator body 20a of the insulator 20, the rib portions 23a-23e assume the
following length relationship: the outermost, first rib portion 23a located outermost
is the longest ; the second rib portion 23b adjacent to the first rib portion 23a
is shorter than the first rib portion 23a; and the innermost, fifth rib portion 23e
is the shortest. The third rib portion 23c adjacent to the second rib portion 23b
assumes a length such that the third rib portion 23c intersects a straight line L1
tangent to the end of the first rib portion 23a and to that of the second rib portion
23b. The fourth rib portion 23d adjacent to the third rib portion 23c assumes a length
such that the fourth rib portion 23d intersects a straight line L2 tangent to the
end of the first rib portion 23a and to that of the third rib portion 23c. FIG. 2
shows the insulator 20 in which such length relationship is established among the
rib portions 23a-23e.
[0030] In an insulator in the above-described form; for example, the conventional insulator
10 shown in FIG. 1, when non-turbulent wind blows along a straight line L3 tangent
to the end of the outermost, first rib portion 13a and to that of the second rib portion
13b, the wind generates a Karman vortex between the first rib portion 13a and the
second rib portion 13b, thereby inducing micro-vibration of the insulator body 10a.
When the frequency of this micro-vibration coincides with the acoustic natural frequency
of a space provided between adjacent insulators of an insulator apparatus , the insulator
apparatus generates a loud noise.
[0031] By contrast, in the insulator 20 according to the present embodiment as shown in
FIG. 2, when non-turbulent wind blows along the straight line L1 tangent to the end
of the outermost, first rib portion 23a and to that of the second rib portion 23b,
the wind impinges against an end part of the third rib portion 23c and is reflected,
and the reflected wind disturbs air flow present between the first rib portion 23a
and the second rib portion 23b, which air flow would otherwise allow generation of
a Karman vortex. Thus, there can be prevented generation of a Karman vortex between
the first rib portion 23a and the second rib portion 23b.
[0032] When non-turbulent wind blows along the straight line L2 tangent to the end of the
first rib portion 23a and to that of the third rib portion 23c, the wind impinges
against an end part of the fourth rib portion 23d and is reflected, and the reflected
wind disturbs air flow present between the first rib portion 23a and the third rib
portion 23c, which air flow would otherwise allow generation of a Karman vortex. Thus,
there can be prevented generation of a Karman vortex between the first rib portion
23a and the third rib portion 23c.
[0033] Therefore, the insulator 20 is completely or substantially free from generation of
micro-vibration to be induced by a Karman vortex generated between rib portions 23a-23e;
in other words, the insulator 20 can control generation of a Karman vortex, which
is a factor to induce noise, thereby preventing generation of noise from the same
and from an insulator apparatus.
[0034] In the insulator 20, since the fifth rib portion 23e is located a considerable distance
from the outermost, first rib portion 23a and the diameter of the fifth rib portion
23e is small, the chance of generation of a Karman vortex between the rib portions
23a and 23e is few and low. Therefore, no particular preventive means is required
for preventing generation of a Karman vortex between the rib portions 23a and 23e.
[0035] A noise-controlled insulator apparatus to a second aspect of the present invention
is applicable to an insulator apparatus including a plurality of insulators connected
vertically in series, the insulators each having a disklike shed portion and a plurality
of annular rib portions formed concentrically on an underside of the shed portion
and projecting downward along respectively predetermined lengths. FIG. 3 shows a conventional,
typical insulator apparatus 30A in this form; FIG. 4 shows an insulator apparatus
30B according to an embodiment of the present invention; and FIG. 5 shows an insulator
apparatus 30C according to another embodiment of the present invention. These insulator
apparatus 30A-30C use, as components, insulators in the same form as that of the insulator
10 shown in FIG. 1.
[0036] The conventional insulator apparatus 30A shown in FIG. 3 is configured such that
a plurality of insulators 30a are connected in series, each insulator 30a having the
same structure as that of the insulator 10 shown in FIG. 1, while a shed portion of
each insulator 30a has a radius D0, and a distance H0 is maintained between the lower
ends of the adjacent insulators 30a. Generally, the conventional insulator apparatus
30A has a ratio D0/H0 of 0.8-1.3.
[0037] By contrast, the insulator apparatus 30B according to an embodiment of the present
invention as shown in FIG. 4 is configured such that a plurality of insulators 30b
are connected in series, each insulator 30b having the same structure as that of the
insulator 10 shown in FIG. 1, while a shed portion of each insulator 30b has the radius
D0, and a distance H1 is maintained between the lower ends of the adjacent insulators
30b. The distance H1 is greater than the distance H0 of the conventional insulator
apparatus 30a, and is attained by using for the insulator 30b a metallic pin longer
than that of the insulator 30a, whereby the insulator apparatus 30B has a ratio D0/H1
not greater than 0.7.
[0038] The insulator apparatus 30C according to another embodiment of the present invention
as shown in FIG. 5 is configured such that a plurality of insulators 30c are connected
in series, each insulator 30c having the same structure as that of the insulator 10
shown in FIG. 1, while a shed portion of each insulator 30c has a radius D1, and the
distance H0 is maintained between the lower ends of the adjacent insulators 30c. The
radius D1 is less than the radius D0 of the conventional insulator apparatus 30a,
whereby the insulator apparatus 30C has a ratio D1/H0 not greater than 0.7.
[0039] The conventional insulator apparatus 30A assumes a ratio D0/H0 of 0.8-1.3, where
D0 is the radius of the shed portion of each of the insulators 30a, and H0 is the
distance between the lower ends of adjacent insulators 30a. As a result, the insulator
apparatus 30A often exhibits a phenomenon such that, in a string of insulators 30a,
the acoustic natural frequency of a space provided between adjacent insulators 30a
coincides with the frequency of micro-vibration induced by a Karman vortex generated
between rib portions of each insulator 30a. When the acoustic natural frequency coincides
with the frequency of micro-vibration, the insulator apparatus 30A generates a loud
noise.
[0040] By contrast, the insulator apparatus 30B or 30C according to the present invention
is configured such that the ratio of the radius D of a shed portion of each insulator
30b or 30c to the distance H between the lower ends of adjacent insulators 30b or
30c; i.e., D0/H1 or D1/H0, is not greater than 0.7, thereby falling outside a range
of from 0.8 to 1.3. Thus, the insulator apparatus 30B or 30C avoids the coincidence
between the acoustic natural frequency of a space provided between adjacent insulators
30b or 30c and the frequency of micro-vibration induced by a Karman vortex generated
between rib portions of each insulator 30b or 30c. Therefore, in the case of the insulator
apparatus 30B or 30C according to the present invention, even when a Karman vortex
is generated between rib portions, there can be prevented generation of a loud noise,
which would otherwise result from the coincidence between the frequency of micro-vibration
induced by a Karman vortex and the acoustic natural frequency.
EXAMPLES
[0041] An insulator (Comparative Example 1) having the same structure as that of the insulator
10 shown in FIG. 1, an insulator (Comparative Example 2) having the same structure
as that of the insulator shown in FIG. 1 of Japanese Patent Publication (
kokoku) No. 06-101261, and an insulator (Example 1) having the same structure as that of
the insulator 20 shown in FIG. 2 were fabricated and subjected to a wind tunnel test
(Experiment 1).
[0042] Moreover, by use of insulators having the same structure as that of the insulator
10 shown in FIG. 1, an insulator apparatus (Comparative Example 3) having the same
structure as that of the insulator apparatus 30A shown in FIG . 3, an insulator apparatus
(Example 2) having the same structure as that of the insulator apparatus 30B shown
in FIG. 4, and an insulator apparatus (Example 3) having the same structure as that
of the insulator apparatus 30C shown in FIG. 5 were fabricated. Subsequently, an acoustic
resonance test was performed by use of each of these insulator apparatuses (Experiment
2).
(Experiment 1)
[0043] Sample insulators : Insulators of the following three kinds were employed as sample
insulators to be tested. Comparative Example 1: an insulator having the same structure
as that of the insulator 10 shown in FIG. 1 and configured such that the shed diameter
is 300 mm; and the length of the outermost, first rib portion 13a is 40 mm. Comparative
Example 2: an insulator having the same structure as that of the insulator shown in
FIG. 1 of Japanese Patent Publication (
kokoku) No. 06-101261 and configured such that the shed diameter is 300 mm; the length of
the outermost, first rib portion is 40 mm; and the third rib portion has a length
such that the third rib portion intersects a straight line tangent to the end of the
first rib portion and to that of the second rib portion . Example 1: an insulator
having the same structure as that of the insulator 20 shown in FIG. 2 and configured
such that the shed diameter is 300 mm; the length of the outermost, first rib portion
23a is 40 mm; the third rib portion 23c has a length such that the third rib portion
23c intersects the straight line L1 tangent to the end of the first rib portion 23a
and to that of the second rib portion 23b; and the fourth rib portion 23d has a length
such that the fourth rib portion 23d intersects the straight line L2 tangent to the
end of the first rib portion 23a and to that of the third rib portion 23c.
[0044] Wind tunnel test: The wind tunnel test employed the wind tunnel test chamber shown
in FIG. 2 of Japanese Patent Publication (
kokoku) No. 06-101261 (the applicant is the same as that of the present application). A
plurality of sample insulators were connected in series . The resultant string of
insulators was hung from the ceiling of the wind tunnel test chamber. Wind was directed
laterally on the string of insulators at a wind velocity ranging from 0 m/sec to 25
m/sec. The sound pressure level was measured by use of a directional microphone installed
with a predetermined distance from the string of insulators. The results are shown
by the graph of FIG. 6 (Comparative Example 1), the graph of FIG. 7 (Comparative Example
2), and the graph of FIG. 8 (Example 1).
[0045] Study on test results: According to the results of measurement of sound pressure
level, all of the tested insulators show a gradual increase in sound pressure level
with wind velocity; however, in the case of the insulators of Comparative Example
1, as is apparent from the graph of FIG. 6, a plurality of local sound pressure peaks
appear over a wide wind velocity range of from low wind velocity to high wind velocity,
implying generation of noise in a plurality of wind velocity zones.
[0046] In the case of the insulators of Comparative Example 2, as is apparent from the graph
of FIG. 7, no local sound pressure peaks appear over a wind velocity range of from
low wind velocity to medium wind velocity; however, a sound pressure peak appears
in a high wind velocity zone, implying generation of noise in a high wind velocity
zone.
[0047] By contrast, in the case of the insulators of Example 1, as is apparent from the
graph of FIG. 8, no local sound pressure peaks appear in a wind velocity range of
from 0 m/sec to 25 m/sec, implying that no noise is generated over the wind velocity
range.
(Experiment 2)
[0048] Sample insulator apparatus: Insulator apparatus of the following three kinds were
employed as sample insulator apparatus to be tested, while a number of different values
of D/H ratio were employed. Insulator apparatus having the same structure as that
of the insulator apparatus 30A shown in FIG. 3 and consisting of insulators each having
the same structure as that of the insulator 10 shown in FIG. 1 and having a shed diameter
of 300 mm and a length of the outermost, first rib portion 13a of 40 mm; insulator
apparatus having the same structure as that of the insulator apparatus 30B shown in
FIG. 4 and consisting of insulators having the same structure and dimensions as described
above; and insulator apparatus having the same structure as that of the insulator
apparatus 30C shown in FIG. 5 consisting of insulators having the same structure and
dimensions as described above. Various values of D/H ratio ranging from 0.44 to 1.41
were employed through employment of various values of the radius D of a shed portion
ranging from 57 mm to 196 mm and various values of the distance H between the lower
ends of adjacent insulators ranging from 100 mm to 320 mm. Dimensional features and
D/H values of the sample insulator apparatus are shown in Table.
[0049] Acoustic resonance test: An each sample insulator apparatus was hung in the acoustic
test chamber as shown in FIG. 9; a speaker 42 was installed so as to face a space
provided between adjacent insulators of a string of insulators 41; sound of the same
frequency as the acoustic natural frequency of the space was produced from the speaker
42 so as to acoustically vibrate the insulators; the resultant sound volume was measured
by use of a microphone 43; an acoustic resonance level in the space was determined
from an acoustic distinguished level. The results are shown in Table and by the graph
of FIG. 10.
Table
Sample insulator apparatus |
Radius of shed portion D (mm) |
Distance between lower ends H (mm) |
Ratio D/H |
Distinguished level (dBA) |
Distinguished ratio (times) |
1 |
81 |
185 |
0.44 |
0 |
1.0 |
2 |
57 |
100 |
0.57 |
1 |
1.1 |
3 |
188 |
320 |
0.59 |
2 |
1.3 |
4 |
59 |
100 |
0.59 |
2 |
1.3 |
5 |
111 |
185 |
0.60 |
3 |
1.4 |
6 |
141 |
230 |
0.61 |
3 |
1.4 |
7 |
188 |
260 |
0.72 |
3 |
1.4 |
8 |
148 |
195 |
0.76 |
10 |
3.2 |
9 |
156 |
205 |
0.76 |
12 |
4.0 |
10 |
141 |
185 |
0.76 |
6 |
2.0 |
11 |
130 |
170 |
0.76 |
1.1 |
3.5 |
12 |
188 |
245 |
0.77 |
5 |
1.8 |
13 |
81 |
100 |
0.81 |
13 |
4.5 |
14 |
119 |
146 |
0.82 |
14 |
5.0 |
15 |
87 |
100 |
0.87 |
14 |
5.0 |
16 |
150 |
170 |
0.88 |
16 |
6.3 |
17 |
89 |
100 |
0.89 |
14 |
5.0 |
18 |
196 |
205 |
0.96 |
17 |
7.1 |
19 |
188 |
195 |
0.96 |
18 |
7.9 |
20 |
111 |
100 |
1.11 |
18 |
7.9 |
21 |
117 |
100 |
1.17 |
19 |
8.9 |
22 |
141 |
100 |
1.41 |
20 |
10.0 |
[0050] Study on test results: The acoustic resonance test has revealed that insulator apparatus
having a D/H ratio not greater than 0.7 (Examples 2 and 3, which correspond to the
insulator apparatus shown in FIGS. 4 and 5) exhibit a distinguished level not greater
than 3 dB, implying that an insulator apparatus having a D/H ratio not greater than
0.7 is free from acoustic resonance. By contrast, insulator apparatus having a D/H
ratio not less than 0.8 (Comparative Example 3, which corresponds to the insulator
apparatus shown in FIG. 3) exhibit a sharp increase in distinguished level at a D/H
ratio in excess of 0.8, implying that an insulator apparatus having a D/H ratio not
less than 0.8 generates noise as a result of acoustic resonance. The wind tunnel test
(at a wind velocity of 0-25 m/sec) was also carried out on these insulator apparatus.
The results obtained from the wind tunnel test exhibit a tendency similar to that
obtained from the acoustic resonance test.