Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a circuit breaker.
Background Art
[0002] Figs. 1 and 2 are each a sectional view of a circuit breaker, in which Fig. 1 is
in its ON position, and Fig. 2 is in its OFF position. Figs. 3A and 3B are a side
view and a plan view each showing an enlarged view of the arc-extinguishing member
of an arc-extinguishing unit of the circuit breaker. With reference to these figures,
movable contact shoe 1 is composed of a conductor such as copper, movable contact
2 is attached to one end of movable contact shoe 1, stationary contact 3 comes into
contact with and parts from movable contact 2, stationary contact shoe 4 is composed
of a body made of, for example, copper and stationary contact 3 attached to the body,
and power-supply-side terminal 5 is formed at the other end of stationary contact
shoe 4, and wiring is connected to terminal 5 from an external power source. Arc-extinguishing
unit 6 includes plural arc-extinguishing plates (grids) 6a, arc-extinguishing side
plates 6b, and arc-extinguishing member 6c shown in Fig. 3. Arc-extinguishing grids
6a are laminated and are arrayed each with spacing, and are composed of a magnetic
metal to cool and extinguish an arc generated between movable contact 2 and stationary
contact 3. Arc-extinguishing side plates 6b support grids 6a from the both sides.
Arc-extinguishing member 6c and arc-extinguishing side plates 6b are each made of
an insulating material. Arc-extinguishing member 6c is arranged between movable contact
2 and stationary contact 3 so as to cover the entire face of stationary contact shoe
4 in such a condition that stationary contact 3 is exposed. Switching mechanism 7
rotates movable contact shoe 1 to thereby drive to open and close movable contact
shoe 1, and handle 8 is for the manual operation of switching mechanism 7. The circuit
breaker also includes trip unit 9 and load-side terminal 10. Cover 11 and base 12
house and affix these components and constitute part of case 16. End plate 13 isolates
terminal 5 from the inside of case 16, has exhaust port 13a for exhausting a hot gas
formed by arc, and is inserted and mounted into guide groove 12a formed in base 12.
Arc runner 14 drives the arc in the direction of terminal 5.
[0003] The operations of the aforementioned circuit breaker will be illustrated below.
[0004] With reference to Fig. 1, when handle 8 is manipulated, switching mechanism 7 trips
to rotate movable contact shoe 1 to thereby allow movable contact 2 and stationary
contact 3 to come into contact with or part from each other. When terminal 5 and terminal
10 are connected to a power source and a load respectively, and the contacts are brought
into contact with each other, power is supplied from the power source to the load.
In this condition, movable contact 2 is pressed against stationary contact 3 at a
predetermined contact pressure in order to ensure the reliability of energizing. When
overcurrents pass through the load side in this state, trip unit 9 detects the overcurrent
condition, and switching mechanism 7 trips to allow arc 15 to generate between the
two contacts 2 and 3, as shown in Fig. 2.
[0005] In contrast, if large overcurrents pass through the circuit associated with, for
example, accidental short circuits, electromagnetic repulsion in an interface between
the two contacts 2 and 3 becomes higher and overcomes the contact pressure applied
to movable contact 2, and movable contact shoe 1 rotates before the action of trip
unit 9 and switching mechanism 7 to invite contacts 2 and 3 to part from each other.
The arc voltage increases with an increasing distance (contact parting distance) between
stationary contact 3 and movable contact 2, and concurrently, arc 15 is attracted
by magnetic power and extends in the direction toward arc-extinguishing unit 6, inviting
further increase in arc voltage. Thus, the arc current reaches a current-cut-off to
extinguish arc 15 to thereby complete circuit interruption.
[0006] Specifically, each arc-extinguishing grid 6a of arc-extinguishing unit 6 absorbs
heat of arc 15 to thereby cool arc 15, and serves to bend arc 15 to increase the contact
parting distance between movable contact 2 and stationary contact 3. Additionally,
arc-extinguishing member 6c prevents origin shift of arc (arc touch) from movable
contact 2 to stationary contact shoe and generates a thermally decomposed gas due
to exposure to arc 15 at high temperatures. This thermally decomposed gas serves as
an arc-extinguishing gas to cool and blow out arc 15.
[0007] In recent years, circuit breakers themselves have been miniaturized with reducing
sizes of switchboards, and plastic materials for use in the circuit breakers require
higher levels of flame retardancy.
[0008] Specifically, demands are made to provide products that meet IEC 60947 Standard in
Europe or UL 746 Standard in U.S.A. with growing world-wide sales. In Japan, the requirement
in flame retardancy of materials that support live parts such as an arc-extinguishing
member is relatively low of UL-HB. However, on these materials, IEC 60947 Standard
specifies a glow wire ignition (GWI) of 960°C or more and a hot wire ignition (HWI)
index of 4 or more in UL 94-V0 or HWI index of 2 or more in UL 94-V2. UL 746 Standard
requires V0 or higher in UL 94. Thus, the two standards require the highest level
flame retardancy of these materials.
[0009] A possible solution to meet these requirements is the application of flame-retardant
resins to arc-extinguishing members. Typical examples of such flame-retardant resins
are halogen-containing flame-retardant resins which include a compound of a halogen
such as bromine, which produces effects even in a small amount.
[0010] However, the halogen-containing flame-retardant resin markedly corrodes a metal to
cause electrode contact failure, and the circuit cannot be energized after repeated
interruption. This is probably because a thermally decomposed gas generated from the
halogen-containing flame-retardant resin by exposure to an arc contains an active
component to the metal. Particularly, a flame-retardant resin containing a halogen
compound is poor in arc-extinguishing capability and is deteriorated in interruption
(shutdown) performance to thereby fail to interrupt the circuit. This is probably
because a decomposed gas which becomes plasma by arc at high temperature (7000°C to
20000°C) contains halogen ions. Alternatively, the distance between the electrodes
must be increased to ensure interruption, preventing miniaturization of the circuit
breaker (switch breaker).
[0011] Development of non-halogenous flame-retardant resins has been growing in recent years.
Known non-halogenous flame-retardant resins include flame-retardant resins containing
a phosphorus compound, a silicone resin or an inorganic flame retarder such as aluminium
hydroxide, and aromatic resins that have flame retardancy as intact, such as poly(phenylene
sulfide).
[0012] Such phosphorus-compound flame retarders are generally difficult to use. Additionally,
flame retarders using red phosphor corrode metals more severely than halogen flame
retarders, and the circuit cannot be energized after repeated interruption, due to
electrode contact failure.
[0013] In the flame-retardant resins each containing a silicone resin flame retarder or
an inorganic flame retarder, an insulating ceramic such as a metal oxide or silicon
oxide is generated in a plasma field of the thermally decomposed gas and deposits
on electrode contacts and contaminates the electrode surfaces to thereby invite contact
failure. Thus, the circuit cannot be energized after repeated interruption. In addition,
the resins containing an inorganic flame retarder must contain large amounts of the
inorganic flame retarder in order to exhibit flame retardancy. However, conventional
inorganic flame retarders such as aluminium hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide have
a too low thermal decomposition temperature to be kneaded into a thermally stable
high melting thermoplastic resin, and the resulting resin cannot significantly contain
large amounts of the inorganic flame retarder and cannot sufficiently exhibit flame
retardancy. Alternatively, even if such an inorganic flame retarder is contained in
large amounts in a low melting thermoplastic resin, the resulting arc-extinguishing
member has decreased mechanical strengths.
[0014] The aromatic resin that exhibits flame retardancy as intact, such as poly(phenylene
sulfide), has a high carbon content in the polymer molecule and tends to have deteriorated
interruption performance. Thus, the distance between the arc and stationary contact
shoe must be increased to ensure sufficient interruption performance, preventing miniaturization
of the circuit breaker.
[0015] Under these circumstances, an object of the present invention is to provide a circuit
breaker that has satisfactory flame retardancy and interruption performance and that
can be miniaturized, by preventing conduction failure due to corrosion or contamination
of electrode contacts caused by imparting of flame retardancy, or by preventing deterioration
in mechanical strengths and in insulation.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
[0016] Specifically, the present invention provides, in an aspect, a circuit breaker which
includes a stationary contact shoe including a conductor and a stationary contact
attached to the conductor; a movable contact shoe carrying a movable contact, the
movable contact being separably arranged with respect to the stationary contact and
being attached to the movable contact shoe; a switching mechanism for rotating the
movable contact; an arc-extinguishing unit for extinguishing an arc generated upon
parting of the stationary contact and the movable contact from each other; and a case
for housing these components. In this circuit breaker, the arc-extinguishing unit
includes an arc-extinguishing member so as to cover the entire face of the stationary
contact shoe, and the arc-extinguishing member includes a molded arc-extinguishing
insulating material mainly containing a non-halogenous flame-retardant resin.
[0017] In the circuit breaker, the molded arc-extinguishing insulating material may include
an organic triazine compound as a flame retarder.
[0018] The matrix resin of the molded arc-extinguishing insulating material in the circuit
breaker may be a polyamide.
[0019] Preferably, the polyamide as the matrix resin of the molded arc-extinguishing insulating
material is a non-aromatic polyamide.
[0020] The non-halogenous flame-retardant resin in the circuit breaker may include at least
one filler selected from the group consisting of 10% by weight or less of organic
fibers relative to the non-halogenous flame-retardant resin, and 15% by weight or
less of ceramic whiskers relative to the non-halogenous flame-retardant resin.
[0021] Preferably, the arc-extinguishing member is composed of a laminate including an arc-exposed
layer to be exposed to arc, and a backup layer supporting the arc-exposed layer, and
the arc-exposed layer is composed of a molded arc-extinguishing insulating material
mainly containing a non-halogenous flame-retardant resin, and the backup layer is
composed of a flame-retardant resin including at least one selected from the group
consisting of glass fibers, inorganic minerals, and ceramic fibers.
[0022] In the aforementioned circuit breaker, part of the backup layer preferably penetrates
the arc-exposed layer at plural points.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0023]
Fig. 1 is a sectional view showing a circuit breaker in an ON condition.
Fig. 2 is a partially sectional view showing the circuit breaker of Fig. 1 in an OFF
condition.
Fig. 3A is a side view of an arc-extinguishing member, and Fig. 3B is a plan view
of the arc-extinguishing member of Fig. 3A.
Fig. 4 is a perspective view of an arc-extinguishing member.
Fig. 5A is a perspective view showing an embodiment of an arc-extinguishing member
of a two-layer structure, and Fig. 5B is a perspective view showing another embodiment
of the arc-extinguishing member of a two-layer structure.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0024] A circuit breaker according to the invention will be illustrated in further detail
with reference to the drawings.
[0025] A feature of the invented circuit breaker is that, in the configuration of principle
components illustrated in Figs. 1 to 3A and 3B, arc-extinguishing member 6c comprises
a molded arc-extinguishing insulating material mainly containing a non-halogenous
flame-retardant resin. Of arc-extinguishing unit 6, arc-extinguishing member 6c is
closest to an arc generated between contacts 2 and 3.
[0026] The molded arc-extinguishing insulating material preferably comprises an organic
triazine compound as a flame retarder.
[0027] Such organic triazine compounds include, for example, the compounds described in
Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 53-31759. In preferred compounds,
thermally decomposed gases generated from the compounds due to exposure to arc contain
neither metal corrosive substance nor metal oxide. Such preferred compounds include,
but are not limited to, melamine, ammelide, ammeline, formoguanamine, guanylmelamine,
cyanomelamine, arylguanamine, melam, melem, mellon, and other melamine derivatives,
melamine compounds, melamine condensates, and other melamines; trimethyl cyanurate,
triethyl cyanurate, tri(n-propyl) cyanurate, methyl cyanurate, diethyl cyanurate,
and other cyanuric acid compounds, trimethyl isocyanurate, triethyl isocyanurate,
tri(n-propyl) isocyanurate, methyl isocyanurate, diethyl isocyanurate, and other isocyanuric
acid compounds.
[0028] The content of these organic triazine compounds is preferably from 5% to 20% by weight
and more preferably from 10% to 15% by weight relative to a matrix resin described
below.
[0029] Matrix resins for use in the molded arc-extinguishing insulating material include,
but are not limited to, polyolefins, polyolefin copolymers, polyacetals, polyacetal
copolymers, polyamides, and polyamide copolymers as described in, for example, Japanese
Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 7-302535. Among them, preferred matrix
resins are such that thermally decomposed gases, which are generated from the resins
upon exposure to arc, contain less amounts of components inviting metal corrosion,
contamination of electrode contacts, or free carbon and other components deteriorating
conduction and arc-extinguishing property. Of these resins, nylon 12, nylon 11, nylon
610, nylon 6, nylon 66, nylon 46, nylon 6T, nylon 9T, and other polyamides are more
preferred for their excellent mechanical characteristics and high compatibility with
the organic triazine compound, of which nylon 6, nylon 66, nylon 46, and other non-aromatic
polyamides are typically preferred, since these non-aromatic polyamides yield less
amounts of a surface carbonized layer of the molded arc-extinguishing insulating material
upon exposure to arc.
[0030] The non-halogenous flame-retardant resin preferably comprises at least one filler
selected from the group consisting of 10% by weight or less of organic fibers and
15% by weight or less of ceramic whiskers, each relative to the non-halogenous flame-retardant
resin.
[0031] Such organic fibers for use in the present invention include, but are not limited
to, fibers that consume upon combustion, such as ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene
fibers, nylon fibers (polyamide fibers), polyarylate fibers, aramid fibers, poly(p-phenylenebenzobisoxazole)
fibers, and phenol fibers. Among them, aramid fibers and poly(p-phenylenebenzobisoxazole)
fibers are typically preferred, since they have satisfactory kneading property (miscibility)
with the matrix resin, a melting point higher than the molding temperature, an appropriate
decomposition temperature and high mechanical characteristics.
[0032] Ceramic whiskers for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to,
needle-crystal whiskers having a diameter of several micrometers, such as of alumina,
zinc oxide, magnesium hydroxide, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, potassium titanate,
aluminium borate, and other metal oxides, hydroxides, nitrides, carbides, or boric
acid compounds. Among them, whiskers of magnesium hydroxide and of aluminium borate
are preferred, as they do not deteriorate insulating resistance of the molded article,
are resistant to arc-induced ionization, and are easily available.
[0033] In general, when a flame-retardant resin containing an organic triazine compound
includes a filler such as an inorganic compound or glass fiber, a burnt residue derived
from the glass or inorganic compound destroys a char-forming layer that imparts flame
retardancy to the organic triazine compound upon combustion. Specifically, flame retardancy
is deteriorated by "candle effect" of the burnt residue remained on the surface of
the molded article. However, organic fibers or ceramic whiskers are employed in the
present invention to avoid these problems, since these substances consume or disappear
upon combustion to thereby yield a less amount of burnt residue on the surface of
the molded article.
[0034] The molded arc-extinguishing insulating material for use in the present invention
can be obtained in the following manner. Initially, a resin pellet containing a flame
retarder, or a powdery flame retarder and a neat resin pellet are concurrently introduced
into the hopper of an extruder, and a predetermined amount of an organic fiber or
ceramic whisker is fed from the side feeder of the extruder into a molten region of
the resin to yield pellets of non-halogenous flame-retardant resin, and the resin
pellets are molded by a conventional injection molding technique.
[0035] Alternatively, the arc-extinguishing member in the present invention may be composed
of a laminate including an arc-exposed layer to be exposed to arc, and a backup layer
to support this arc-exposed layer.
[0036] For example, when molded arc-extinguishing insulating material 6a as shown in Fig.
4 is used as the arc-extinguishing member, molded arc-extinguishing insulating material
6a can comprise, for example, arc-exposed layer 6a-1 and backup layer 6a-2, as shown
in Fig. 5A. The arc-exposed layer 6a-1 is composed of a molded arc-extinguishing insulating
material mainly containing a non-halogenous flame-retardant resin, and the backup
layer 6a-2 is composed of a flame-retardant resin containing at least one selected
from the group consisting of glass fibers, inorganic minerals, and ceramic fibers.
In a preferred embodiment as shown in Fig. 5B, part of the resin constituting backup
layer 6a-2 penetrates arc-exposed layer 6a-1 at plural points, for example, in the
form of comb. This configuration enhances a bonding force between arc-exposed layer
6a-1 and backup layer 6a-2.
[0037] Fillers for reinforcing the flame-retardant resin contained in backup layer 6a-2
are not specifically limited and can be selected from conventional glass fibers, inorganic
minerals and/or ceramic fibers, as far as they do not deteriorate the insulating resistance
of the molded article. The content of the filler is preferably from 5% to 50% by weight
and more preferably from 15% to 30% by weight relative to a matrix resin mentioned
below. According to necessity, an appropriate amount of a halogenous flame retarder
can be used in this layer. Backup layer 6a-2 is arranged on the back of arc-exposed
layer 6a-1 with respect to arc or is located at a distance from an arc core having
a large energy, and is therefore only exposed to relatively weak arc winds turning
around. Accordingly, this layer is less thermally decomposed or less forms a carbonized
layer by action of arc, and the flame retarder contained in this layer is not specifically
limited as far as it exhibits flame retardancy of glow wire ignition of 960°C and
of V0 or higher in UL 94 Standard and it does not deteriorate the mechanical strengths
of the backup layer.
[0038] Matrix resins for use in backup layer 6a-2 include, but are not limited to, polyolefins,
polyacetals, polyamides, aromatic polyamides, aromatic polyesters, aromatic polyethers,
aromatic polysulfones, copolymers of these polymers, and other thermoplastic resins;
epoxy resins, unsaturated polyester resins, phenol resins, melamine resins, urea resins,
allyl resins, and other thermoplastic resins. Among them, thermoplastic resins are
preferred for their satisfactory moldability, of which aromatic polyamides are typically
preferred, since they have satisfactory heat resistance and impact resistance and
have a high compatibility with the resin constituting arc-exposed layer 6a-1.
[0039] In the embodiments shown in Figs. 5A and 5B, the molded arc-extinguishing insulating
material composed of arc-exposed layer 6a-1 and backup layer 6a-2 can be integrally
molded by, for example, a known two-color injection molding technique. Alternatively,
the molded arc-extinguishing insulating material can be prepared by any other technique
such as a technique, in which arc-exposed layer 6a-1 and backup layer 6a-2 are separately
molded, and the two layers are bonded using, for example, an adhesive to yield the
molded arc-extinguishing insulating material.
EXAMPLES
[0040] The present invention will be illustrated in further detail with reference to several
examples and comparative examples below, which are not intended to limit the scope
of the invention. All percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified.
EXAMPLE 1
[0041] A non-halogenous flame-retardant resin for use in this example was composed of a
matrix resin nylon 66 and 10% of cyanomelamine as a flame retarder relative to the
matrix resin. Specifically, the non-halogenous flame-retardant resin was prepared
by dry-blending a predetermined amount of a cyanomelamine flame retarder (produced
by DSM, under the trade name of melapur MC) and a resin pellet (produced by Toyobo
Co., Ltd., under the trade name of T-662), and the blend was kneaded in a biaxial
extruder. A plate 1.6 mm thick obtained by injection molding was cut into the form
of each test piece, and the resulting test pieces were subjected to evaluation of
flame retardancy. Separately, a molded arc-extinguishing insulating material in the
shape shown in Fig. 4 having a wall thickness of 1.6 mm was prepared by injection
molding and was subjected to a simulated test using an actual device for evaluating
interruption performance.
[0042] In flame retardancy tests, test pieces were evaluated according to UL 94 Standard,
UL 746 Standard: HWI (hot wire ignition test) and IEC 707 Standard: GWI (glow wire
ignition test), respectively using specific testing machines, UL 94 flammability testing
machine (produced by Suga Test Instruments), HWI ignitability testing machine (produced
by Suga Test Instruments), and GWI flammability testing machine (produced by Suga
Test Instruments).
[0043] As interruption performance tests, the following overload test and short-circuit
test were performed by using a prototype of a circuit breaker simulating an actual
device.
[0044] Overload test: An electric current six times as much as a rated current (e.g., 600 A in a circuit
breaker for 100 A circuit) was allowed to pass through a circuit breaker including
the arc-extinguishing unit having the above configuration in an ON condition, and
movable contact 2 was parted from stationary contact 3 at a contact parting distance
L (distance between movable contact 2 and stationary contact 3) of 25 mm. In this
procedure, a test piece that successfully interrupted an arc current the predetermined
number of times (twelve times) passed the test.
[0045] Short-circuit test: An overcurrent of 50 KA at a voltage from 230 V to 690 V was allowed to pass in an
ON condition, and the movable contact shoe was parted to generate an arc current.
In this procedure, a test piece that successfully interrupted the arc current the
predetermined number of times (three times) and exhibited no damage (specifically,
no deficit in the case) passed the test.
[0046] Assuming a circuit breaker of a class of 100 to 250 AF, Overload Test 1, Overload
Test 2, and Overload Test 3 were performed at three-phase 720 V/600 A, three-phase
720 V/1050 A, and three-phase 720 V/1500 A, respectively. Short-circuit Test 1, Short-circuit
Test 2, and Short-circuit Test 3 were performed at three-phase 500 V/30 KA, 500 V/50
KA, and 440 V/65 KA, respectively.
[0047] The composition of this resin, and the results of the flame retardancy test and interruption
performance test are shown in Table 1. The table shows the number of times of successful
circuit interruption in the overload test, and show the number of times of successful
circuit interruption and the presence or absence of damage.
[0048] The test pieces in this example had V0 in accordance with UL 94 Standard, a HWI index
of 4, and GWI of 960°C and were acceptable according to each of the standards for
flame retardancy. Regarding interruption performance, the test piece successfully
interrupted the circuit the predetermined number of times (twelve times) in Overload
Tests 1, 2 and 3, and successfully interrupted the circuit the predetermined number
of times (three times) in Short-circuit Tests 1 and 2. However, in Short-circuit Test
3, the test piece successfully interrupted the circuit only twice and part of the
case exhibited a crack. This is probably because the arc had a high energy in Short-circuit
Test 3, and part of the arc-extinguishing member dropped off by the pressure of arc
winds and was involved in an arc field to increase the formation of a thermally decomposed
gas to thereby damage the case; and the arc-extinguishing member was chipped in the
second short-circuit interruption, and could not generate a sufficient amount of a
thermally decomposed gas as to blow out the arc current and could not interrupt the
circuit in the third short-circuit operation. When the resin having the composition
as in Example 1 is applied to a highly rated circuit breaker having severe interruption
requirements, that is, in order to pass Short-circuit Test 3, the gap distance between
the normal of the stationary contact and the movable contact constituting the core
of the arc, and the face of the arc-extinguishing member to be arced must be increased
(i.e., the arc-extinguishing unit must be upsized), or the arc-extinguishing member
must be reinforced in order to avoid deficit by the pressure of arc winds.
EXAMPLES 2 TO 5
[0049] In Examples 2 to 5, neat resins of different types of nylons containing neither reinforcement
nor flame retarder were used as the matrix resins. Resin pellets and test pieces were
prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except for the type of the matrix resin,
and flame retardancy and interruption performance of these were evaluated. The test
results are shown in Table 1.
[0050] Used matrix resins were nylon 6 (PA 6; produced by Toyobo Co., Ltd., under the trade
name of T-803) in Example 2, nylon 46 (PA 46; produced by DJEP, under the trade name
of Stanyl TS-300) in Example 3, nylon 6T (PA 6T; produced by Toyobo Co., Ltd., under
the trade name of TY-502 NZ) in Example 4, and nylon 9T (PA 9T; produced by Kuraray
Co., Ltd.) in Example 5.
[0051] In Examples 2 and 3, the test pieces successfully interrupted the circuit only twice
in Short-circuit Test 3. This is probably because part of a slit member (arc-extinguishing
member) was chipped by the arc winds as in Example 1, since the matrix resin was a
neat resin containing no reinforcement. However, these test pieces showed satisfactory
results in the other short-circuit tests and overload tests. In Examples 4 and 5,
the test pieces successfully interrupted the circuit eleven times, slightly less than
the predetermined number of times, in overload Test 3. This is probably because the
resins contained an aromatic moiety and this component invited carbonization of the
surface of the slit member (arc-extinguishing member). However, these test pieces
showed satisfactory results in the other overload tests and short-circuit tests.
EXAMPLES 6 TO 9
[0052] As a reinforcement, resin pellets for use in Examples 6 and 7 contained 5% and 10%
of a chopped strand aramid fiber (produced by Teijin Ltd., under the trade name of
Technora) relative to a matrix resin, and resin pellets for use in Examples 8 and
9 contained 10% and 15% of an aluminium borate whisker (produced by Shikoku Kasei
Kogyo Co., Ltd., under the trade name of Aluborex). These resin pellets contained
the non-halogenous flame-retardant resin used in Example 1 as the matrix resin, and
were prepared by adding and kneading a predetermined amount of the reinforcement to
the matrix resin from the side feeder of a biaxial extruder. Test pieces were then
prepared and were subjected to the tests in the same manner as in Example 1. The test
results are shown in Table 1.
[0053] As a result, all the test pieces according to these examples passed the flame retardancy
tests and interruption performance tests. This is probably because 10% or less of
the aramid fiber or 15% or less of the aluminium borate whisker added as the reinforcement
improved impact resistance of the arc-extinguishing member, without deteriorating
flame retardancy.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1 AND 2
[0054] In Comparative Examples 1 and 2, a halogenous brominated polystyrene (Br-PS) was
used as the flame retarder. The flame-retardant resin for use in Comparative Example
1 contained a matrix resin nylon 66 (PA 66; produced by Toyobo Co., Ltd., under the
trade name of T-662), 25% of brominated polystyrene (produced by Tosoh Corp., under
the trade name of Flame-cut 210R) and 10% of antimony trioxide (Sb
2O
3) as a flame retardant assistant. The flame-retardant resin for use in Comparative
Example 2 was composed of the flame-retardant resin used in Comparative Example 1
and further comprised 30% of a glass fiber.
[0055] These flame-retardant resins containing a halogenous flame retarder, brominated polystyrene,
exhibited satisfactory flame retardancy. The test piece according to Comparative Example
2 containing a glass fiber passed UL 94 Standard and GWI Standard, and the test pieces
according to Comparative Examples 1 and 2 had a very satisfactory HWI index of 2,
as compared with a resin containing cyanomelamine of an index of 4 to 3. However,
the test piece according to Comparative Example 1 passed none of the overload tests
and short-circuit tests in any test condition. The test piece according to Comparative
Example 2 became incapable of conducting after interruption procedures half or less
of the required number of times of successful interruption in Short-circuit Test 3
on short-circuit interruption performance and all the tests on overload interruption
performance. This is probably because a gas generated upon exposure to arc contained
bromine, and the bromine corroded a contact metal to thereby invite incapable conduction
in the overload interruption tests; and an arc-extinguishing gas contained bromine
ions that prolonged an arc extinguishing time and consumed the grids of the arc-extinguishing
unit to thereby deteriorate interruption performance.

EXAMPLES 10 TO 14
[0056] In Examples 10 to 14, arc-extinguishing members according to the embodiments shown
in Figs. 5A and 5B were subjected to the tests. Molded articles according to Examples
10 to 13 had a simple two-layer structure, as shown in Fig. 5A, obtained by laminating
arc-exposed layer 6a-1 containing nylon 66 with cyanomelamine as used in Example 1,
and backup layer 6a-2 containing a halogen flame-retardant resin reinforced with an
organic compound or a glass fiber indicated in Table 2. These arc-extinguishing members
were prepared by a two-color molding technique in which the arc-exposed layer 0.8
mm thick was initially injection-molded and then the backup layer was injection-molded
to a total wall thickness of 1.6 mm. The arc-extinguishing member according to Example
14 had a partially penetrating two-layer laminated structure in which part of backup
layer resin 6a-2 penetrated the surface of arc-exposed layer 6a-1 to thereby enhance
the bonding force between the arc-exposed layer and backup layer, as shown in Fig.
5B. Specifically, part of the backup layer penetrated, in the form of comb in cross
section, the arc-exposed layer comprising a non-halogenous flame-retardant resin.
[0057] Backup layer resins used in Examples 10 to 14 were commercially available flame-retardant
resins that exhibit V0 in UL 94 Standard and meet the requirements in HWI and GWI.
Used backup layer resins were a bromine-containing flame-retardant polyamide 66 (PA
66) containing 25% of a glass fiber (produced by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company,
under the trade name of Zytel FR50) in Example 10, a bromine-containing flame-retardant
polyamide 66 (PA 66) containing 30% of talc (produced by E. I. du Pont de Nemours
and Company, under the trade name of Zytel FR70 M30) in Example 11, a bromine-containing
flame-retardant polyamide 46 (PA 46) containing 20% of a glass fiber (produced by
DJEP, under the trade name of Stanyl TS 250 F40) in Example 12, a bromine-containing
flame-retardant polyamide 46 (PA 46) containing 45% of a glass fiber (produced by
DJEP, under the trade name of Stanyl TS 250 F90) in Example 13, and the bromine-containing
flame-retardant polyamide 66 (PA 66) containing 25% of a glass fiber (produced by
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, under the trade name of Zytel FR50) in Example
14 which was the same resin as in Example 10.
[0058] Table 2 shows the evaluation results in interruption performance of Examples 10 to
14. As a result, the arc-extinguishing members according to these examples successfully
interrupted the circuit the predetermined number of times in any of the short-circuit
tests and overload tests and showed satisfactory interruption performances. This is
probably because the arc-exposed layer showed no deficit due to arc winds in the short-circuit
tests and the backup layer resin invited less formation of a carbonized layer in the
overload tests.
[0059] The arc-extinguishing member according to Example 14 had the backup layer resin exposed
in part of the surface of the arc-exposed layer, and there was fear that the exposed
resin might be carbonized to thereby deteriorate overload interruption performances.
However, the arc-extinguishing member exhibited satisfactory results in any of overload
test conditions. This is probably because the surface of arc-extinguishing member
was only dotted with a carbonized layer of the exposed resin, and the creepage resistance
of the arc-exposed layer resin was maintained, and an electrically continuous pass
via the creepage surface of the arc-extinguishing member to the stationary contact
shoe was not formed.
[0060] In these examples, the two-color molding technique was employed in bonding of the
arc-exposed layer and the backup layer, from the viewpoint of mass-production, but
the molding method is not specifically limited to this type, and the two layers can
be bonded using, for example, an adhesive according to necessity.

[0061] Advantages of the present invention will be described below.
1) A first embodiment of the invented circuit breaker includes a stationary contact
shoe including a conductor and a stationary contact attached to the conductor; a movable
contact shoe carrying a movable contact, the movable contact being separably arranged
with respect to the stationary contact and being attached to the movable contact shoe;
a switching mechanism for rotating the movable contact; an arc-extinguishing unit
for extinguishing an arc generated upon parting of the stationary contact and the
movable contact from each other; and a case for housing these components. In this
circuit breaker, the arc-extinguishing unit includes an arc-extinguishing member so
as to cover the entire face of the stationary contact shoe, and the arc-extinguishing
member includes a molded arc-extinguishing insulating material mainly containing a
non-halogenous flame-retardant resin. This circuit breaker can prevent conduction
failure due to corrosion or contamination of electrode contacts or can prevent deterioration
in mechanical strengths and in insulation to thereby ensure flame retardancy, and
can improve interruption performances such as overload interruption or short-circuit
interruption.
2) In a second embodiment of the invented circuit breaker, the molded arc-extinguishing
insulating material includes an organic triazine compound as a flame retarder. This
configuration can ensure flame retardancy and can further improve overload interruption
performances and can miniaturize the arc-extinguishing unit, since the resulting arc-extinguishing
gas does not contain phosphorus compounds being highly corrosive to metals such as
contact metals, and silicon or metal oxides that cause contact failure.
3) In a third embodiment of the invented circuit breaker, the matrix resin of the
molded arc-extinguishing insulating material in the circuit breaker is a polyamide.
This configuration can control deterioration in insulation due to carbonization of
the surface of the molded arc-extinguishing insulating material and can further improve
overload interruption performances.
4) In a fourth embodiment of the invented circuit breaker, the polyamide as the matrix
resin of the molded arc-extinguishing insulating material is a non-aromatic polyamide.
This circuit breaker can further control deterioration in insulation due to carbonization
of the surface of the molded arc-extinguishing insulating material and can further
improve overload interruption performances and can miniaturize the arc-extinguishing
unit.
5) In a fifth embodiment of the invented circuit breaker, the non-halogenous flame-retardant
resin includes at least one filler selected from the group consisting of 10% by weight
or less of organic fibers and 15% by weight or less of ceramic whiskers, each relative
to the non-halogenous flame-retardant resin. This configuration can improve impact
resistance of the arc-extinguishing member and can improve short-circuit interruption
performances without deterioration of flame retardancy.
6) In a sixth embodiment of the invented circuit breaker, the arc-extinguishing member
is composed of a laminate including an arc-exposed layer to be exposed to arc, and
a backup layer supporting the arc-exposed layer, and the arc-exposed layer is composed
of a molded arc-extinguishing insulating material mainly containing a non-halogenous
flame-retardant resin, and the backup layer is composed of a flame-retardant resin
containing at least one selected from among glass fibers, inorganic minerals, and
ceramic fibers. This configuration can ensure flame retardancy and can improve impact
resistance of the arc-extinguishing member to further improve short-circuit interruption
performances.
7) A seventh embodiment of the invented circuit breaker, in which part of the backup
layer penetrates the arc-exposed layer at plural points, can strengthen bonding between
the arc-exposed layer and backup layer of the arc-extinguishing member to thereby
further improve short-circuit interruption performances.
[0062] Other embodiments and variations will be obvious to those skilled in the art, and
this invention is not to be limited to the specific matters stated above.