Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to the use of the antiprogestin 11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-hydroxy-17α-(1,1,2,2,2-pentafluoroethyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one
or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative or analogue thereof for the preparation
of a medicament for the treatment of a type of cancer selected from the group of breast
cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, myeloma and meningioma, wherein an indicator
of high risk is an increased amount of tumor cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle.
Background of the Invention
[0002] Antiprogestins represent a relatively new and promising class of therapeutic agents
that could have significant impact on the treatment of hormone-dependent tumors and
other diseases. Although antiprogestins were originally created with regard to medicinal
non-surgical termination of pregnancy, certain antiprogestins have gained considerable
importance, e.g., in the endocrine therapy of those breast cancers which possess receptors
for progesterone (T. Maudelonde et al., in: J.G.M. Klijn et al.,
Hormonal Manipulation of Cancer: Peptides, Growth Factors and New (Anti) Steroidal
Agents, Raven Press, New York, 1987, pp. 55-59).
[0003] This new strategy in endocrine therapy is based on the antitumor activity of antiprogestins
in progesterone receptor positive human breast cancer cell lines
in vitro and in several hormone-dependent mammary tumors of the mouse and rat
in vivo. In particular, the antitumor mechanism of the antiprogestins onapristone and mifepristone
(RU 486) has already been investigated using the hormone-dependent MXT mammary tumor
model of the mouse as well as the DMBA- and the NMU-induced mammary tumor models of
the rat (M. R. Schneider et al.,
Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol., Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 691-701, 1989; H. Michna et al.,
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 14:275-288, 1989; H. Michna,
J. Steroid. Biochem. Vol. 34, Nos 1-6, pp. 447-453, 1989). However, due to low activity and adverse side
effects involved with e.g. mifepristone this compound could not be recommended as
a single agent in the management of breast cancer (D. Perrault et al.,
J. Clin. Oticol. 1996 Oct, 14(10), pp.2709-2712). Furthermore, mifepristone exhibits strong antiglucocorticoid
side effects (cf. L.M. Kettel et al.,
Fertil. Steril. 1991 Sep, 56(3), pp. 402-407; X. Bertagna,
Psychoneuroendocrinology 1997; 22 Suppl. 1, pp. 51-55).
[0004] The determination of the percentage of tumor cells in the respective phases of the
cell cycle can be performed by the powerful DNA flow cytometry method (cf. G. M. Clark
et al.,
N. Engl. J. Med. 320,1989, March, pp.627-633; L. G. Dressler et al.,
Cancer 61(3), 1988, pp. 420-427 and literature cited therein). It has thus been shown that
the stages of the cell cycle of a tumor cell, and specifically, the number of tumor
cells in certain stages of the cycle, may be an important clinical predictor of disease
progression and success of therapy. The number of cells in the S-phase of the cell
cycle are particularly important in this regard.
[0005] EP 0 495 825 B I discloses the use of antiprogestins (competitive progesterone antagonists)
for the production of medicaments for the treatment of mammary carcinomas having an
increased content of tumor cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle, which is considered
to be a high risk factor. This is based on the observation that antiprogestins are
capable of blocking the progression of tumor cells in the G
0G
1-phase of the cell cycle resulting in a substantial decrease of tumor cells in the
S-phase. This effect was however not observed with the standard breast cancer therapy
tamoxifen, estrogen therapy or ovariectomy. The antiprogestins tested in EP 0 495
825 B1 are 11β-[4-N,N-dimethylamino)-phenyl]-17α-hydroxy-17β-(3-hydroxypropyl)-13α-methyl-4,9(10)-gonadien-3-one
and 11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-hydroxy-17α-(prop-1-inyl)-4,9(10)-estradien-3-one.
[0006] 17a-fluoroalkylsteroids having strong antiprogestin activity as well as methods for
producing them are described in WO 98/34947. WO 98/34947 does not discuss or investigate
the role that the 17a-fluoroalkylsteroids disclosed therein may play in cell apoptosis
or cell cycle arrest.
[0007] Given the potential value of agents that induce apoptosis in cells, e.g., in the
case of tumor cells, by blocking progression in the G
0G
1-phase, it is desirable to identify further agents, e.g., antiprogestins, having this
specific mechanism of action. Such agents would have potential application in treating
and preventing certain types of cancer, such as breast cancer, wherein an indicator
of high risk is an increased amount of tumor cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle.
Object of the Invention
[0008] It is thus an object of the present invention to further investigate the mode of
action of antiprogestins in inhibiting hormone-dependent diseases such as breast cancer
and to provide a method for the targeted induction of apoptosis in cells.
[0009] Surprisingly, the inventors have discovered that the antiprogestin 11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-hydroxy-17α-(1,1,2,2,2-pentafluoroethyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one
(or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative or analogue thereof) may be used for
the induction of apoptosis in a cell.
Summary of the Invention
[0010] The present invention is based on the unexpected observation that the antiprogestin
1 Ip-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-hydroxy-17α-(1,1,2,2,2-pentatluoroethyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one
(hereinafter referred to as "antiprogestin (I)") induces apoptosis and cell death
in the tumor cells of standard breast cancer tumor models. It was found that antiprogestin
(I) is capable of inducing apoptosis in cells via the initiation of terminal differentiation.
[0011] Thus, the present invention provides the use of antiprogestin (I) or a pharmaceutically
acceptable derivative or analogue thereof for the preparation of a medicament for
the treatment of breast cancer, ovarion cancer, endometrial cancer, myclona and meningoma.
Preferably, the induction of apoptosis is caused by the initiation of terminal differentiation.
The cell is preferably a mammalian cell, more preferably a human cell and most preferably
a tumor cell, wherein the tumor is preferably breast cancer.
[0012] Another aspect of the present invention is the use of antiprogestin (I) or a pharmaceutically
acceptable derivative or analogue thereof for the preparation of a medicament for
the treatment of types of cancer wherein an indicator of high risk is an increased
amount of tumor cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle.
[0013] A further aspect of the present invention is the use of antiprogestin (I) or a pharmaceutically
acceptable derivative or analogue thereof for the induction of apoptosis in a cell
in vitro. Preferably, the cell is a mammalian cell, more preferably a human cell and most preferably
a tumor cell, wherein the tumor is preferably breast cancer.
[0014] Another aspect of the present invention is a method of inducing apoptosis in a cell
by administering an effective amount of antiprogestin (I) to the cell. This method
may be applied
in vitro or
in vivo. Preferably, the cell is a mammalian cell, more preferably a human cell and most preferably
a tumor cell, wherein the tumor is preferably breast cancer.
[0015] Due to the ability to induce cell apoptosis the antiprogestin (I) or a pharmaceutically
acceptable derivative or analogue thereof may be used for the treatment of certain
types of cancer, such as breast cancer, wherein an indicator of high risk is an increased
amount of tumor cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle. Other types of cancer or hormone-dependent
diseases that may be affected and treated by antiprogestin (I) due to its ability
to induce cell apoptosis may include, e.g., breast cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial
cancer, myeloma, meningoma, i.e. diseases which substantially originate or are influenced
by the presence of hormone receptors and/or hormone-dependent pathways.
Brief Description of the Figures
[0016]
Figure 1 shows the tumor growth inhibiting effect as a result of the induction of
apoptosis by antiprogestin (I) in a dose-response study in the DMBA-induced mammary
carcinoma of the rat, compared with a control, the antiprogestin onapristone as well
as ovariectomy. The study was performed with 0.5, 2.0, 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg s.c. daily
doses of antiprogestin (I).
Figure 2 shows the tumor growth inhibiting effect as a result of the induction of
apoptosis by antiprogestin (I) in the NMU-induced mammary carcinoma of the rat, compared
with a control and ovariectomy. The study was performed with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg s.c.
daily doses of antiprogestin (I).
Figure 3 shows the induction of apoptosis and thus the tumor growth inhibiting effect
of antiprogestin (I) in a 10 mg/kg s.c. dose on xenotransplanted human T47D tumors
in scid mice, compared to a control and ovariectomy.
Figure 4 demonstrates the induction of apoptosis and thus the tumor growth inhibiting
effect of a 10 mg/kg s.c. dose of antiprogestin (I) in the MCF-7 human breast cancer
model in scid mice, compared to a control and ovariectomy.
Figures 5A to 5F show histological data relating to the induction of apoptosis in
the NMU-induced breast cancer model in rat (cf. Example 5). In particular, figure
5A shows that tumors treated with antiprogestin (I) display ductal and acinous formations,
usually filled with secretory material, compared to the control (figure 5B). Figure
5C shows untreated NMU-induced breast cancer tissue with high PCNA (proliferating
cell nuclear antigen) immunoreactivity as compared to NMU-induced breast cancer tissue
treated with antiprogestin (I) (figure 5D), which exhibits low PCNA immunoreactivity.
Figure 5E shows the appearance of apoptosis in antiprogestin (I)-treated NMU-induced
breast cancer tissue, compared to the control (figure 5E).
Figure 6 demonstrates the tumor growth inhibiting effect of antiprogestin (I) in the
T47D breast cancer cell line (stimulated by estradiol) with an effective threshold
concentration of 10-9 to 10-8 mol/l, compared with the antiprogestin onapristone and the pure antiestrogen 11β-fluoro-7α-{5-[N-methyl-N-3-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylthio)-propylamino]-pentyl}-estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-3,17β-diol
(WO 98/07740).
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0017] Antiprogestin (I) ― 11 β-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-hydroxy-17α-(1, 1,2,2,2-pentafluoroethyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one
― is represented below by formula (I):

[0018] Antiprogestin (I) (or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative or analogue thereof)
is a valuable pharmaceutical agent having strong antiprogestin activity. Antiprogestin
(I) can be used according to the present invention for the induction of apoptosis
in cells.
[0019] However, it should also emcompass compounds capable of inhibiting the biosynthesis
of progestins.
[0020] Pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives or analogues of antiprogestin (I) in the
context of the present invention may include, for example, any one of the inventive
compounds disclosed in WO 98/34947.
[0021] The studies performed in the context of the present invention show the potent tumor-inhibiting
properties of the antiprogestin (I) in a variety of hormone-dependent tumor models
(see Examples 1 to 6). It is further demonstrated that the tumor inhibiting activity
of antiprogestin (I) as a result of the induction of apoptosis is stronger than conventional
anti-tumor agents, such as, the antiestrogen tamoxifen. The treatment of breast cancer
using the antiprogestin (I) according to the present invention is even superior to
ovariectomy.
[0022] Application of antiprogestin (I) in the various tumor models as demonstrated below
in the Examples revealed an accumulation of tumor cells in the G
0G
1 phase of the cell cycle together with a significant and biologically relevant reduction
in the number of cells in the S and G
2M phase of the cell cycle. These results indicate an induction of differentation.
Differentiation-specific G
1 arrest has already been proposed earlier for other stem cell systems (see J.J. Wille
Jr.,
Cancer Res. 1982, 42(12):5139-46; R.E. Scott,
J. Cell. Biol. 1982, 94(2):400-405).
[0023] The experimental results obtained in the various tumor models revealed that treatment
with antiprogestin (I) seems to trigger differentiation of the mitotically active
polygonal tumor cells towards glandular structures and acini with a massive sequestering
of secretory products, as well as towards spindle-shaped necrobiotic subpopulations
(see Example 5 and in particular figures 5A and 5B). Whereas tumor size, mitotic index
and the grade of malignancy decreased distinctly, the volume fraction of glandular
structures in the tumors as well as the appearance of apoptosis increased 3-fold compared
to the controls (see Example 5, figures 5E and 5F).
[0024] Without limitation to any theory, these results indicate that the main mechanism
of the antitumor action of antiprogestin (I) in the tested models is a direct progesterone-receptor-mediated
antiproliferative effect at the level of the tumor cells, via the induction of terminal
differentiation associated with terminal cell death. In this manner, antiprogestin
(I) appears to be capable of eliminating the intrinsic block in terminal differentiation
inherent in malignant tumor cells in progesterone receptor-positive tumors. This antiproliferative
effect of antiprogestin (I) seems to be dissociated from the antihormone (antiprogestional)
activity of antiprogestin (I).
[0025] Agents such as antiprogestin (I) that induce apoptosis in cells, for example, in
the case of tumor cells, by blocking progression in the G
0G
1-phase, have potential applications for treating and preventing numerous conditions.
Such agents, including antiprogestin (I), may be used for treating those cancers where
an indicator of high risk is an increased amount of tumor cells in the S-phase of
the cell cycle, such as in breast cancer.
[0026] Thus one aspect of the present invention is the use of antiprogestin (I) or a pharmaceutically
acceptable derivative or analogue thereof for preparation of a medicament for the
induction of apoptosis in a cell. In a preferred embodiment, the use of antiprogestin
(I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative or analogue thereof relates to a medicament
for the induction of apoptosis in a tumor cell, preferably a breast tumor cell, in
a human. Such medicament could be beneficial in the treatment of hormone-dependent
diseases such as breast cancer, wherein an indicator of high risk is an increased
amount of tumor cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle.
[0027] The manufacture of the medicaments may be performed according to methods known in
the art. Commonly known and used adjuvants as well as further suitable carriers or
diluents may be used. Suitable carriers and adjuvants may be such as recommended for
pharmacy, cosmetics and related fields in: Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Technical Chemistry, Vol. 4, (1953), pp. 1-39;
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 52 (1963), p. 918ff; H.v.Czetsch-Lindenwald, "Hilfsstoffe Wr Pharmazie und angrenzende
Gebiete";
Pharm. Ind. 2, 1961, p.72ff; Dr. H.P. Fiedler,
Lexikon der Hilfsstoffe für Pharmazie, Kosmetik und angrenzende Gebiete, Cantor KG, Aulendorf in Württemberg, 1971.
[0028] Antiprogestins suitable for the purposes of the present invention, preferably antiprogestin
(I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative or analogue thereof, can be incorporated
into pharmaceutical compositions according to known methods of preparing galenics
for oral or parenteral, e.g., intraperitoneal, intramuscular, subcutaneous or percutaneous
application. They can also be implanted into tissue. Implants can comprise as inert
materials e.g. biologically degradable polymers or synthetic silicones such as e.g.
silicone rubber.
[0029] They can be administered in the form of tablets, pills, dragees, gel capsules, granules,
suppositories, implants, injectable sterile aqueous or oily solutions, suspensions
or emulsions, ointments, creams, gels or by intravaginal (e.g., vaginal rings) or
intrauterine systems (e.g., diaphragms, loops).
[0030] For the preparation of a medicament for oral administration, the antiprogestins suitable
for the purposes of the present invention as defined above can be admixed with commonly
known and used adjuvants and carriers such as for example, gum arabic, talcum, starch,
sugars such as, e.g., mannitose, methyl cellulose, lactose, gelatin, surface-active
agents, magnesium stearate, aqueous or non-aqueous excipients, paraffin derivatives,
crosslinking agents, dispersants, emulsifiers, lubricants, conserving agents and flavoring
agents (e.g., ethereal oils). In a pharmaceutical composition, the antiprogestin may
be dispersed in a microparticle, e.g. a nanoparticulate, composition.
[0031] In order to further enhance the bioavailability of the active agent, the antiprogestins
suitable for the purposes of the present invention as defined above can also be formulated
as cyclodextrin clathrates by reacting them with α-, β- or γ-cyclodextrines or derivatives
thereof according to the method as disclosed in PCT/EP95/02656.
For parenteral administration the antiprogestins suitable for the purposes of the
present invention as defined above can be dissolved or suspended in a physiologically
acceptable diluent, such as, e.g., oils with or without solubilizers, surface-active
agents, dispersants or emulsifiers. As oils for example and without limitation, olive
oil, peanut oil, cottonseed oil, soybean oil, castor oil and sesame oil may be used.
[0032] The amount to be administered (i.e., a "pharmaceutically effective amount") varies
within a broad range and depends on the condition to be treated and the mode of administration.
It can cover any amount efficient for the intended treatment. Determining a "pharmaceutically
effective amount" is within the purview of the person skilled in the art.
[0033] One unit dose may represent about 0.1 to 100 mg active agent(s). For administration
to humans, the daily dose of the active agent(s) is about 0.1 to 400 mg, preferably
10 to 100 mg, most preferably 50 mg.
[0034] The medicaments can also be administered via a depot injection or an implant preparation,
optionally for sustained delivery of the active agent(s).
[0035] The preferred mode of administration is oral administration. The antiprogestins for
use according to the invention, and in particular, antiprogestin (I) are particularly
suitable for oral administration.
[0036] According to all aspects of the present invention it is also possible to combine
at least one antiprogestin as defined above, in particular antiprogestin (I) or a
pharmaceutically acceptable derivative or analogue thereof, with at least one antiestrogen,
because many hormone-dependent diseases, in particular breast cancer, exhibit not
only progesterone receptors, but also estrogen receptors. The antiestrogen may be
administered either simultaneously with or sequentially to the antiprogestin, and
in particular with/to antiprogestin (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative
or analogue thereof. The amount of antiprogestin and antiestrogen may be equal or
one component may be more predominant than the other, such as in an antiprogestin:antiestrogen
ratio of 1:50 to 50:1, preferably 1:30 to 30:1, and most preferably 1:15 to 15:1.
[0037] Examples of suitable antiestrogens for use according to the invention are non-steroidal
antiestrogens, such as tamoxifen and nafoxidine as well as raloxifen, faslodex and
EM800. Examples of steroidal antiestrogens include those disclosed in EP 0 348 341
A and those disclosed in WO 98/07740, in particular, 11β-flouro-7α-{5-[N-methyl-N-3-(4,4,5,5,5-pentaflouropentylthio-propylamino]-pentyl}-estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-3,17β-diol,
or those disclosed in WO 99/33855, in particular 11β-flouro-7α-{5-[methyl-(7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,10-nonafluoro-decyl)-amino]-pentyl}
-estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-3,17β-diol or pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives or analogues
thereof. Aromatase inhibitors having an antiestrogen effect, such as those disclosed
on pages 7 to 8 of EP 0 495 825 B1 may also be used as antiestrogens.
[0038] Another aspect of the present invention is the use of antiprogestin (I) or a pharmaceutically
acceptable derivative or analogue thereof for the preparation of a medicament for
the treatment of a type of cancer wherein an indicator of high risk is an increased
amount of tumor cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle. The number of tumor cells
in the S-phase may be determined by DNA flow cytometry as described in Dressler et
al., "DNA Flow Cytometry and Prognostic Factors in 1331 Frozen Breast Cancer Specimens,"
Cancer, Vol. 61(3), 1988, pp. 420-427; see also McGuire & Dressler, "Emerging Impact of Flow
Cytometry in Predicting Recurrence and Survival in Breast Cancer Patients,"
JNCI, Vol. 75(3), 1985, pp. 405-409. A high risk amount of tumor cells in the S-phase indicates
a particularly suitable candidate for the use according to the invention. In the case
of antiprogestin (I), the advantage arises from both the potent anti-tumor effect,
as evidenced by the standard animal models (see Examples 1 to 4), and the mechanism
of action of this agent of inducing apoptosis (see in particular Example 5) and cell
cycle arrest.
[0039] In an alternative aspect the present invention provides a method for inducing apoptosis
in a cell. The cell is preferably a mammalian cell and most preferably a human cell,
and the method may be applied
in vitro or
in vivo. Preferably, apoptosis is induced via the mechanism of initiating terminal differentiation,
for example, by the administration of antiprogestin (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable
derivative or analogue thereof. In the method, an effective amount of antiprogestin
(I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative or analogue thereof may be applied
to the cells in question. For example in the T47D breast cancer cell line, whose growth
is stimulated by the administration of estradiol, antiprogestin (I) induced a complete
inhibition of cell growth with an effective threshold concentration of between 10
-9 and 10
-8 mol (see Example 6 and figure 6). This is especially surprising as the known antiprogestin
onapristone has no reducing effect on cell growth in this tumor model. Thus, antiprogestin
(I) is superior with regard to potency and efficacy to other antiprogestins such as
onapristone and to antiestrogens such as tamoxifen and even to pure antiestrogens
such as 11β-fluoro-7α-{5-[N-methyl-N-3-(4,4,5,5 ,5-pentafluoropentylthio)-propylamino]-pentyl}-estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-3,17β-diol
(WO 98/07740).
[0040] The role of antiprogestin (I) in the induction of apoptosis in the cell indicates
that this antiprogestin (or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative or analogue thereof)
may be useful in a host of conditions, particularly hormone-dependent conditions,
where induction of apoptosis is particularly desired. Specifically, it may be used
in the treatment of such diseases as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer,
myeloma, anowlatory infertility, meningoma, i.e., diseases which substantially originate
or are influenced by the presence of hormone receptors and/or hormone-dependent pathways.
Antiprogestins, such as antiprogestin (I), may thus be further used for the preparation
of medicaments for inducing apoptosis or cell death for the treatment of hormone-dependent
diseases as already described above.
[0041] The invention is further illustrated in the examples. The following examples are
not to be understood as a limitation.
Examples
Example 1:
Dose-response study in the DMBA-induced tumor model
Materials and Methods:
[0042] Immature female Sprague-Dawley rats (49 - 51 days old; 10 animals/group) were used
in this study. Mammary tumors were induced by a single oral administration of 10 mg
7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA, Serva/Heidelberg). Rats with at least one established
tumor with a size of more than 150 mm
2 were treated for 4 weeks by: 1) solvent control, 2) ovariectomy at treatment start,
3) antiprogestin (I), 0,5 mg/kg s.c., 4) antiprogestin (I), 2 mg/kg s.c., 5) antiprogestin
(1), 5 mg/kg s.c., 6) antiprogestin (I), 10 mg/kg s.c., and 7) onapristone, 5 mg/kg,
s.c., daily. As a parameter for growth inhibition the change of tumor area (in % with
respect to initial tumor size) determined by weekly caliper measurements was used.
For statistical analysis of intergroup differences of mean values the Kruskal-Wallis-test
was used. For a further description and evaluation of the DMBA prevention model, see
R.G. Metha,
European Journal of Cancer 36 (2000), pp. 1275-1282.
Results:
[0043] In intact control animals, progressive tumor growth was observed, whereas ovariectomy
caused a considerable tumor regression in 90% of the animals. Treatment with antiprogestin
(I) at doses of or above 2 mg/kg resulted in a significant induction of apoptosis
resulting in inhibition of tumor growth compared with the control (see fig. 2). There
was a clear dose-response relationship. Whereas treatment with 0.5 mg/kg antiprogestin
(I) did not significantly prevent the tumor from growing, at 2 mg/kg maximal induction
of apoptosis and thus growth inhibition was observed. In this group a complete tumor
regression was seen in 50% of the rats. The effect of the highest dose of antiprogestin
(I) tested in this experiment (10 mg/kg), was comparable to that of 2 mg/kg. Onapristone
(5 mg/kg, s.c.) was distinctly less effective than antiprogestin (I) at comparable
doses.
Conclusion:
[0044] In the DMBA-induced mammary tumor model in the rat, antiprogestin (I) strongly induced
apoptosis in the tumor cells and thus completely suppressed the tumor growth in intact
animals. It was found that 2 mg/kg antiprogestin (I) has a maximal apoptotic effect
on tumor cells. Antiprogestin (I) was distinctly superior to onapristone regarding
the inhibition of tumor growth.
Example 2:
Tumor growth inhibition in NMU-induced breast cancer model in rat
Materials and Methods:
[0045] Tumors were induced by a single intravenous injection of NMU (nitrosomethylurea,
50 mg/kg) in female Sprague-Dawley rats (obtained from Tierzucht Schönwalde, age 50-55
days). Starting 10 days later, rats with at least one established tumor were treated
for 4 weeks by: 1) solvent control, 2) ovariectomy at treatment start, 3) antiprogestin
(I), 1.0 mg/kg/day, 4) antiprogestin (1), 0.5 mg/kg/day and 5) onapristone, 5 mg/kg/day.
As a parameter for growth inhibition the change of tumor area (in % of initial tumor
size) determined by weekly caliper measurements was used. For statistical analysis
of intergroup differences of mean values the Kruskal-Wallis-test was used.
Results:
[0046] In intact control animals, progressive tumor growth was observed, whereas ovariectomy
caused a complete tumor growth inhibition. Treatment with antiprogestin (I) at doses
of 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg resulted in a significant inhibition of tumor growth due to the
induction of apoptosis compared with the control (see fig. 2). Onapristone (5 mgi7cg)
was distinctly less effective than antiprogestin (I) at the much lower dose of 0.5
mg/kg.
Conclusions:
[0047] In the MNU-induced mammary tumor model in the rat, due to its potent ability to induce
apoptosis in tumor cells, antiprogestin (I) completely suppresses the tumor growth
in intact animals. Both doses (1.0 mg/kg as well as 0.5 mg/kg) of antiprogestin (I)
have a significant apoptotic effect on tumor cells.
Example 3:
Human T47D breast cancer xenograft in scid mice
Materials and Methods:
[0048] Female Fox Chase scid mice (M&B) were supplemented with estradiol pellets (Innovative
Research of America). T47D breast cancer cells, obtained from cell culture and suspended
in matrigel, were implanted s.c. in the inguinal region of the mice. Treatment was
started when the tumors were approximately 25 mm
2 in size. Treatment was continued until progression of the tumors. Experimental groups
were: 1) control (vehicle), 2) ovariectomy, 3) antiprogestin (I), 10 mg/kg s.c. Tumor
area was determined by caliper measurements. The Kruskal Wallis test was used for
statistical analysis of intergroup differences of mean values.
Results:
[0049] In the T47D breast cancer model, ovariectomy resulted in a considerable inhibition
of tumor growth, compared with the rapid growth in the control. Fig. 3 clearly shows
that the s.c. application of 10 mg/kg antiprogestin (I) induces apoptosis in the tumor
cells. The effect of antiprogestin (1) is almost comparable to the effect of conventional
estrogen deprivation therapy (ovariectomy).
Conclusion:
[0050] The effect of antiprogestin (I) in inducing apoptosis and thus inhibiting the growth
of the human T47D breast cancer xenografted in Fox Chase scid mice is comparable to
the effect of standard estrogen deprivation therapy (ovariectomy) which is considered
to be the maximum effective method of inhibiting growth of breast cancer in this model.
Example 4:
Human MCF-7 breast cancer xenograft in scid mice
Materials and Methods:
[0051] Female Fox Chase scid mice (M&B) were supplemented with estradiol pellets (Innovative
Research of America). MCF7 breast cancer cells, obtained from cell culture and suspended
in matrigel, were implanted s.c. in the inguinal region of the mice. Treatment was
started when the tumors were approximately 25 mm
2 in size. Treatment was continued until progression of the tumors. Experimental groups
were: 1) control (vehicle), 2) ovariectomy, 3) antiprogestin (I), 10 mg/kg s.c. Tumor
area was determined by caliper measurements. The Kruskal Wallis test was used for
statistical analysis of intergroup differences of mean values.
Results:
[0052] In the MCF7 breast cancer model, ovariectomy resulted in a considerable inhibition
of tumor growth, compared with the rapid growth in the control. Fig. 4 clearly shows
that the s.c. application of 10 mg/kg antiprogestin (I) induced apoptosis in the tumor
cells. The effect of antiprogestin (1) is comparable to the effect of conventional
estrogen deprivation therapy (ovariectomy).
Conclusion:
[0053] The effect of antiprogestin (I) in inducing apoptosis and thus inhibiting the growth
of the human MCF7 breast cancer xenografted in Fox Chase scid mice is comparable to
the effect of standard estrogen deprivation therapy (ovariectomy).
Example 5:
NMU-induced breast cancer in rat (histology, proliferation index and TUNEL assay)
Materials and Methods:
[0054] Tumors were induced by a single intravenous injection ofNMU (nitrosomethylurea, 50
mg/kg) in female Sprague-Dawley rats (obtained from Tierzucht Schönwalde, age 50-55
days). Rats with at least one established tumor with a size of more than 150 mm
2 were treated for 7 days by: 1) solvent control, 2) ovariectomy at treatment start,
3) antiprogestin (I), 3 mg/kg s.c., daily. At the end of treatment tumors were excised,
fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Histology, proliferation index and apoptosis
induction assays were performed on these resected tumors.
[0055] Histology: For histology tissue slides were stained with haematoxilin and analyzed by microscopy.
[0056] Proliferation Index: To determine the proliferation index the expression of PCNA was determined. Proliferating
cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a 36 kD nuclear protein associated with the cell cycle.
Nuclear PCNA immunoreactivity is found in the proliferative compartment of normal
tissues. A monoclonal antibody, that recognizes a fixation and processing resistant
epitope has been used to investigate its tissue distribution.
[0057] TUNEL (Apoptosis Test): The biochemical hallmark of apoptosis is the degradation of the genomic DNA, an irreversible
event that results in cell death. This characteristic DNA fragmentation is the result
of the activation of nuclear endonucleases, which selectively cleave DNA at sites
located between nucleosomal units. These DNA strand breaks were detected by enzymatic
labeling of the 3'-OH termini with fluorescein-dUTP using terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase (TUNEL,
Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase-Mediated d
UTP
Nick
End
Labeling, cf. Gavrieli et al., J. Cell. Biol. 119, 493, 1992). Incorporated fluorescein
was detected using the anti-fluorescein antibody alcaline phosphatase conjugate followed
by alcaline phosphatase substrate reaction.
Results:
[0058] Histology: After treatment with antiprogestin (I), the tissue sections from the NMU tumors displayed
dysplastic ductal and acinous formations, usually filled with secretory material (Figure
5A). Moreover, the volume fraction of glandular structures in the tumors increased
compared to controls (Figure 5B). In addition, the mammary tumors of antiprogestin
(I) treated animals showed the morphological features of differentiation.
[0059] Proliferation Index: PCNA immunoreactivity is high in untreated NMU-induced breast cancer tissue (Figure
5C: Untreated control). The number of cells with PCNA immunoreactivity is reduced
by induction of differentiation in NMU-induced breast cancer tissue from rats treated
with antiprogestin (I) (Figure 5D). These data demonstrate that in breast cancer,
treatment with antiprogestin reduces the proliferation index by induction of differentiation.
[0060] TUNEL (Apoptosis): Figure 5E demonstrates the appearance of apoptosis induced by antiprogestin (1) in
NMU-induced breast cancer tissue in comparison with untreated control (Figure 5F).
It is clearly evident that antiprogestin (I) alone was capable of inducing apoptosis
in the NMU-induced breast cancer tissue and thus inhibited the growth of these tumors.
Example 6:
Antiproliferative activity of antiprogestin (I) in vitro in the T47D cell line
Materials and Methods:
[0061] T47D cells were grown in charcoal-treated serum supplemented with 0.1 nM E2 (estradiol)
plus antiprogestin (I) for 6 days with one medium change. Following fixation and subsequent
staining with crystal violet, the absorbance was recorded and values normalized to
the absorbance of untreated controls as described in R.B. Lichtner,
J.
Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1999, 71;181-189. The TUNEL assay is performed analogous to above Example 5 with
the only difference that instead of tissue sections cells that are cultivated on microscopic
slides are used for the assay.
Results:
[0062] In this T47D cell line
in vitro test, antiprogestin (I) exhibited potent tumor growth inhibiting activity with an
effective threshold concentration as low as 10
-9 to 10
-8 mol/l whereas the antiprogestin onapristone did not show any inhibiting effect. Even
the pure antiestrogen 11β-fluoro-7α-{5-[N-methyl-N-3-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylthio)-propylamino]-pentyl}-estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-3,17β-diol
(WO 98/07740) was distinctly less effective than antiprogestin (I) (see figure 6).
Conclusion:
[0063] Antiprogestin (I) according to the present invention induces complete inhibition
of estradiol-stimulated T47D cell growth at very low concentrations and is thus superior
regarding potency and efficacy to other antiprogestins tested such as onapristone
and to the pure antiestrogen 11β-fluoro-7α-{5-[N-methyl-N-3-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylthio)-propylamino]-pentyl}-estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-3,17β-diol.