[0001] The present invention relates to cleaning liquid mediums for cleaning the surfaces
of substrates for devices in steps in the production of semiconductor devices, display
devices, or the like and to a method of cleaning with the same. More particularly,
the invention relates to substrate surface cleaning liquid mediums and a cleaning
method which are effective in efficiently removing contaminant particles (fine particles)
present on a substrate in a certain time period to highly clean the substrate surface.
[0002] In steps in the production of semiconductor devices such as microprocessors, memories,
and CCDs or of flat panel display devices such as TFT liquid-crystal displays, a circuit
pattern or thin film of submicron size is formed on surfaces of substrates made of
silicon (Si), silicon oxide (SiO
2), glass, or another material. It is extremely important to reduce the contaminants
present in a slight amount on the substrate surface in each step in the production.
[0003] Among such contaminants, fine particles such as, e.g., silica particles, alumina
particles and particles of organic substances especially reduce the yield of devices.
It is therefore necessary to reduce these fine particles as much as possible before
the substrate is sent to the subsequent step. The technique generally employed for
the removal of such contaminants is to clean the substrate surface with a cleaning
liquid medium.
[0004] It is generally known that alkaline solutions are effective in the removal of particulate
contaminants. Alkaline aqueous solutions such as aqueous solutions of ammonia, potassium
hydroxide, tetramethylammonium hydroxide, or the like are used for the surface cleaning
of silicon or SiO
2 substrates for semiconductor devices or glass substrates for display devices. Cleaning
with a cleaning liquid medium comprising ammonia, hydrogen peroxide, and water (referred
to as "SC-1 cleaning liquid medium" or "APM cleaning liquid medium") is also used
extensively (this cleaning is referred to as "SC-1 cleaning" or "APM cleaning") (see,
for example,
W. Kern and D.A. Puotinen, RCA Review, p.187, June (1970)). The cleaning generally requires from 1 to 15 minutes.
[0005] Typical apparatuses for the cleaning are of two kinds. One of these is a batch cleaning
apparatus in which two or more substrates placed in a cassette are cleaned usually
by immersion in a cleaning liquid medium placed in a cleaning tank. The other is a
sheet-by-sheet (so-called single wafer) cleaning apparatus in which one substrate
is attached to a holder and a cleaning liquid medium is sprinkled over the substrate
surface usually while revolving the substrate (e.g., when the substrate has a disk
form, it is revolved in the circumferential direction). The batch cleaning apparatus
can treat a large number of substrates per unit time (has a high throughput). However,
this apparatus not only has a large size but also has problems, for example, that
the contaminants which have been released from the device formation-side surface of
a substrate or from the back side thereof may readhere to the device formation-side
surface of another substrate to cause so-called cross contamination and that it is
necessary to use the cleaning liquid medium in a large amount even when only one substrate
is cleaned.
[0006] On the other hand, the sheet-by-sheet cleaning apparatus has a small size and is
free from cross contamination. However, it has a problem that the throughput is low
because substrates are cleaned one by one.
[0007] Recently, as a result of the trend toward higher fineness in circuit patterns, particles
smaller than those which have been regarded as contaminants have become problematic.
Particles have the property of becoming difficult to remove as the particle diameter
thereof decreases. It has been pointed out that the APM cleaning is insufficient in
the ability to remove fine particles having a particle diameter on a 0.1 µm level
(see
H. Morinaga, T. Futatsuki, and T. Ohmi, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.142, p.966 (1995)). In device production, a further improvement in throughput and a further increase
in production efficiency are desired and to reduce the cleaning time also is an important
subject.
[0008] APM cleaning has been used for more than 30 years in order to remove particulate
contaminants. At present, however, the particle diameters of the particles which should
be removed are far smaller and the production efficiency required is far stricter
as compared with those at that time when this cleaning method was developed. There
is a desire for a cleaning method which can more efficiently remove fine particles
to highly clean the substrate surface in a shorter time period.
[0009] On the other hand, addition of various surfactants to an alkaline cleaning liquid
medium has been proposed for the purpose of, e.g., inhibiting the substrate surface
from being roughened or etched, improving wetting properties, or improving the ability
to remove oily contaminants or particulate contaminants.
[0010] For example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.
335294/1993 proposes a technique for inhibiting a substrate surface from being roughened. This
technique comprises adding a surfactant to an alkaline solution of hydrogen peroxide
and thereby regulating the solution so as to have a contact angle of 10° or smaller
with semiconductor substrates.
[0011] Japanese Patent No.
3,169,024 proposes a technique for improving the substrate surface-wetting properties of a
cleaning liquid medium. This technique comprises adding an ethylene oxide addition
type nonionic surfactant which has a polyoxyethylene group and the number of ethylene
oxide (oxyethylene) groups in the polyoxyethylene group is from 3 to 10 to an alkaline
cleaning liquid medium containing hydrogen peroxide.
[0012] Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.
2001-40389 proposes to add various surfactants to an alkaline aqueous solution in order to inhibit
the silicon substrate from being etched.
[0013] Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.
121418/1999 proposes a cleaning liquid medium for semiconductor substrates which contains a specific
surfactant so as to have the improved ability to remove, in particular, oily contaminants.
[0014] Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.
245281/1995 proposes to add an alkylbenzenesulfonic acid to an alkaline cleaning liquid medium
containing hydrogen peroxide in order to improve the ability to remove contaminants.
Furthermore, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.
251416/1993 proposes to add a fluorochemical surfactant comprising a fluoroalkyl-sulfonamide
compound to an APM cleaning liquid medium in order to improve the ability to remove
particles.
[0015] However, even when those known surfactants are actually added to an APM cleaning
liquid medium for the purpose of more efficiently removing fine particles on a 0.1
µm level in a shorter time period, which is the recent subject as stated above, then
no improvement is obtained in the ability to remove particles on a 0.1 µm level or
use of the cleaning liquid medium thus obtained poses problems because it produces
the following side effects (1) to (4).
- (1) The surfactants in the cleaning liquid mediums separate out as oil droplets at
room temperature or elevated temperatures. The cleaning liquid mediums thus become
milk-white. They have reduced cleaning performance and use of these cleaning liquid
mediums results, for example, in residual oil droplets on the substrate surface.
- (2) The cleaning liquid mediums froth considerably and adversely influence the operation
of the cleaning apparatus.
- (3) The surfactants themselves remain on the substrate surface.
- (4) The surfactants are substances which may adversely influence the natural environment
and there is no appropriate method of treatment for waste liquids resulting from the
cleaning.
[0016] An object of the present invention was to overcome the problems described above.
An aim of the invention is to provide cleaning liquid mediums capable of removing
finely particulate contaminants more efficiently than conventional techniques from
substrates for devices in the production of semiconductor devices, display devices,
or the like. Another aim of the invention is to provide a cleaning method which enables
the cleaning.
[0017] In order to accomplish those aims, the technique in which a surfactant is added to
an APM cleaning liquid medium as a base was investigated.
[0018] It has been surprisingly found that when a specific surfactant is incorporated into
a liquid mixture comprising water, an alkali, and hydrogen peroxide and having a pH
of 10 to 11.5, then the ability to remove finely particulate contaminants is greatly
improved and this cleaning liquid medium produces almost no side effects. It has also
been found that this cleaning effect is improved by optimizing the concentration of
hydrogen peroxide. It has further been found that this surface cleaning liquid medium
for device substrates simultaneously satisfies the ability to remove particles from
a substrate surface and the property of inhibiting the substrate surface from being
etched. In addition, this cleaning liquid medium is almost free from the decrease
in percentage removal of particles which accompanies a decrease in cleaning liquid
medium temperature during cleaning and has been a problem for cleaning liquid mediums
heretofore in use. Namely, the cleaning liquid medium was found to have an unexpected
effect that even when it is used at temperatures around 50°C, which are regarded as
low for substrate cleaning, the cleaning liquid medium shows the high ability to remove
particles (under such conditions, etching is, of course, inhibited).
[0019] The invention provides a substrate surface cleaning liquid medium which comprises
the following ingredients (A), (B), (C), and (D), has a pH of 10 to 11.5, and a content
of ingredient (C) of from 0.01 to 4% by weight:
- (A) an ethylene oxide addition type surfactant polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers represented
by formula (2) :
R2O-(CH2CH2O)nH (2)
wherein R2 represents an alkyl group having 1 to 30 carbon atoms which may have one or moresubstituents
selected from the group consisting of a hydroxy groups, an amino group, an alkoxy
group having 1 to 30 carbon atoms, and n is a natural number of 50 or less, in which
the ratio of the number of carbon atoms contained in the hydrocarbon group (m) to
the number of oxyethylene groups in the polyoxyethylene group, i.e., m/n, is 1.5 or
less,
- (B) an alkali ingredient,
- (C) hydrogen peroxide, and
- (D) waster, and (E) a complexing agent.
[0020] The invention further provides a substrate surface cleaning liquid medium which,
when used for cleaning a substrate surface, attains a percentage removal of particles
of 94% or higher after the cleaning with respect to the removal of particles having
a particle diameter of 0.06 µm or larger present on the surface, and which, when used
for cleaning a substrate surface having a silicon thermal oxide film thereon, etches
the silicon thermal oxide film to a depth of 1 nm or less.
[0021] The ratio of the number of carbon atoms contained in the optionally substituted hydrocarbon
group (m) to the number of oxyethylene groups in the polyoxyethylene group (n), m/n,
is not particularly limited as long as it is 1.5 or lower. However, the ratio is preferably
0.5m≤/n≤1.5, more preferably 0.7≤m/n≤1.5, most preferably 1.0≤m/n≤1.4. When m/n is
too low, there are cases where the ability to remove particles is reduced and the
increased length of the oxyethylene chain not only makes the surfactant have reduced
solubility in water but also poses problems, for example, that the burden of waste
liquid treatment increases. On the other hand, values of m/n exceeding 1.5 are undesirable
in that the surfactant in the alkaline liquid medium separates out as fine oil droplets
to make the liquid medium milk-white and pose problems, for example, that the cleaning
performance is reduced and oil droplets remain. In the case where the main chain has
one or more hydrocarbon groups as substituents, the total number of carbon atoms in
the hydrocarbon group as the main chain and in the hydrocarbon groups as substituents
is referred to as m.
[0022] The number of oxyethylene groups in the polyoxyethylene group (n) is preferably 10≤n≤50,
more preferably 11≤n≤25, most preferably 11≤n≤15. When n is less than 10, there are
cases where the ability to remove particles is reduced even when the ratio m/n is
within the optimal range shown above. On the other hand, too large values of n are
undesirable in that there are problems, for example, that the burden of waste liquid
treatment increases and the surfactant is apt to decompose in the cleaning liquid
medium.
[0023] Specific examples of such surfactants include polyoxyethylene (n=11) lauryl ether,
polyoxyethylene (n=15) cetyl ether, polyoxyethylene (n=20) oleyl ether, and polyoxyethylene
(n=14) oleylcetyl ether.
[0024] Those surfactants may be used alone or in combination of two or more thereof in any
desired ratio. In the case where two or more surfactants (compounds) differing in
m and n are used simultaneously, one of these may be a compound in which m/n exceeds
1.5 as long as the effects of the invention are not lessened thereby. In this case,
the value of m/n in which m and n each are the average of the m's or n's for all the
surfactant compounds used is preferably m/n≤1.5, more preferably 0.5≤m/n≤1.5.
[0025] The content of ingredient (A) in the cleaning liquid medium is generally from 0.0001
to 0.5% by weight, preferably from 0.0003 to 0.1% by weight, more preferably from
0.001 to 0.01% by weight, based on the cleaning liquid medium. When the concentration
of the surfactant (A) is too low, the ability of the surfactant to remove particulate
contaminants is insufficient. When the concentration thereof is increased too high,
not only the ability to remove particulate contaminants remains unchanged but also
there are cases where the cleaning liquid medium froths considerably, is unsuitable
for use in cleaning steps, and increases the burden of waste liquid treatment with
biodegradation.
[0026] The surfactant (A) in the ordinary form on the market may contain metal impurities,
e.g., Na, K, and Fe, in an amount of about from 1 ppm to several thousand ppm by weight.
Consequently, there is the possibility that the surfactant (A) to be used in the invention
might be a metal contamination source. Because of this, the content of each metal
impurity contained in the surfactant (A) to be used in the invention is reduced beforehand
to preferably 3 ppm by weight or less, more preferably 1 ppm by weight or less. For
obtaining a surfactant purified to such a degree, purification may be conducted, for
example, by dissolving a surfactant in water and passing the resultant solution through
an ion-exchange resin to catch the metal impurities with the resin.
[0027] The alkali ingredient to be used as ingredient (B) in the invention is a general
term for alkaline ingredients which upon dissolution in water give solutions whose
pH values are in the alkaline region e.g. larger than 7. The alkali ingredient (B)
is not particularly limited. However, typical examples thereof include ammonium hydroxide
(aqueous ammonia solution) and organic alkalis.
[0028] Examples of the organic alkalis include amine compounds such as quaternary ammonium
hydroxides, amines, and amino alcohols. Preferred quaternary ammonium hydroxides are
ones having alkyl groups which have 1 to 4 carbon atoms and may be substituted with
a hydroxy group, an alkoxy group (e.g. having 1 to 4 carbon atoms) or a halogen atom.
These substituents may be the same or different. Examples of such alkyl groups include
methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, hydroxymethyl, hydroxyethyl, hydroxypropyl, and hydroxybutyl.
[0029] Specific examples of such quaternary ammonium hydroxides include tetramethylammonium
hydroxide (TMAH), tetraethylammonium hydroxide, trimethyl(hydroxyethyl)-ammonium hydroxide
(common name: choline), and triethyl(hydroxyethyl)ammonium hydroxide. Examples of
the amine compounds other than these include ethylenediamine, monoethanolamine, and
triethanolamine.
[0030] Also usable are the hydroxides of alkali metals or alkaline earth metals, such as
sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and calcium hydroxide, and alkaline salts such
as sodium hydrogen carbonate and ammonium hydrogen carbonate.
[0031] Preferred of those alkali ingredients enumerated above are ammonium hydroxide, tetramethylammonium
hydroxide (TMAH), and trimethyl(hydroxyethyl)ammonium hydroxide (common name: choline)
from the standpoints of cleaning effect, reduced residual metal amount, profitability,
cleaning liquid medium stability, etc. Especially preferred is ammonium hydroxide.
[0032] Those alkali ingredients may be used alone or in combination of two or more thereof
in any desired ratio. The concentration of the alkali ingredient in the cleaning liquid
medium of the invention may be suitably selected. However, it is generally preferably
from 0.001 to 5% by weight, more preferably from 0.002 to 1% by weight. In case where
the concentration thereof is too low, the contaminant-removing effect which is to
be attained by the invention cannot be obtained. On the other hand, too high concentrations
thereof are undesirable in that not only the effect is not enhanced any more and such
high concentrations are uneconomical, but also there is a stronger possibility that
the substrate surface might be damaged by etching.
[0033] Ingredient (C) in the invention is hydrogen peroxide. The presence of hydrogen peroxide
in a given concentration is important especially in the cleaning of substrates in
which silicon is exposed on the surface. Silicon has the property of readily dissolving
in alkaline solutions. Hydrogen peroxide oxidizes the silicon surface to form an extremely
thin SiO
2 film. Since this SiO
2 film has a far lower rate of dissolution under alkaline conditions than silicon,
it can inhibit etching and surface roughening. In conventional techniques, the concentration
of hydrogen peroxide in the alkaline cleaning liquid mediums is 1% by weight or more,
preferably 3% by weight or more, and too low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide lead
to problems that the silicon is excessively etched and the surface is roughened.
[0034] The optimal hydrogen peroxide concentration in substrate surface cleaning liquid
mediums has been investigated on the premise that the specific surfactant (A) described
above is added. As a result, it has been found that even when the hydrogen peroxide
concentration is lower than in the conventional techniques, the problem of substrate
surface roughening can be overcome while maintaining sufficient cleaning performance.
The concentration of hydrogen peroxide in the cleaning liquid medium of the invention
is generally from 0.01 to 4% by weight, preferably from 0.05 to less than 3% by weight,
more preferably from 0.1 to less than 2% by weight, most preferably from 0.2 to less
than 1% by weight. When the concentration of hydrogen peroxide is too low, there are
cases where problems such as the following (1) to (3) arise.
- 1) The silicon is excessively etched or the surface is roughened.
- 2) The ability of hydrogen peroxide to remove organic contaminants is reduced.
- 3) An SiO2 film is not sufficiently formed so that the hydrophobic bare silicon (uncovered with
an oxide film) remains exposed on the surface. Since this bare silicon repels the
cleaning liquid medium or the ultrapure water to be used for rinsing, the cleaning
performance decreases.
[0035] On the other hand, when the concentration of hydrogen peroxide is too high, not only
a higher cleaning effect cannot be expected, but also there are cases where the following
and other problems arise: 1) the hydrogen peroxide oxidatively decomposes the surfactant
and other organic additives; 2) the cleaning cost increases; and 3) the burden of
waste liquid treatment increases.
[0036] In the cleaning liquid medium of the invention, the ratio of the content of the specific
surfactant (A), a, to the content of hydrogen peroxide (C), c, i.e., the ratio a/c,
is generally 1/3000≤a/c≤1/20, preferably 1/1500≤a/c≤1/30, more preferably 1/1000≤a/c≤1/50,
most preferably 1/1000≤a/c≤1/100. In case where a/c is too small, not only the ability
to remove particulate contaminants decreases but also the surfactant is apt to be
decomposed by the hydrogen peroxide. When a/c is too large, there are cases where
such large surfactant ratios pose problems, for example, that the surfactant remains
on the substrate surface and the cleaning liquid medium froths during cleaning.
[0037] Ingredient (D) in the invention is water. In the case where a highly clean substrate
surface is desired, the water to be used generally is deionized water, preferably
ultrapure water. It is also possible to use electrolytic ionic water obtained by water
electrolysis or hydrogenated water obtained by dissolving hydrogen gas in water.
[0038] Besides the ingredients (A), (B), (C), and (D) described above, a complexing agent
is incorporated into the cleaning liquid medium of the invention. The incorporation
of a complexing agent is effective in obtaining an extremely highly clean substrate
surface on which metallic contaminants have been further diminished. The complexing
agent to be used in the invention may be any of known complexing agents. In selecting
a complexing agent, all of the level of contamination of the substrate surface, kind
of the metal, level of cleanness required of the substrate surface, complexing agent
cost, chemical stability, and other factors may be taken into account. Examples of
the complexing agent include the compounds enumerated under the following (1) to (4).
(1) Compounds Having Nitrogen as Donor Atom and Carboxyl and/or Phosphono Group
[0039] Examples thereof include amino acids such as glycine; nitrogen-containing carboxylic
acids such as iminodiacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid [EDTA], trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexanetetraacetic acid [CyDTA], diethylenetriaminepentaacetic
acid [DTPA], and triethylenetetraminehexaacetic acid [TTHA]; and nitrogen-containing
phosphonic acids such as ethylenediaminetetrakis(methylenephosphonic acid) [EDTPO],
nitrilotris(methylenephosphonic acid) [NTPO], and propylenediaminetetra(methylenephosphonic
acid) [PDTMP].
(2) Compounds Having Aromatic Hydrocarbon Ring and Two or More OH and/or O- Groups Directly Bonded to Constituent Carbon Atoms of the Ring
[0040] Examples thereof include phenols and derivatives thereof, such as catechol, resorcinol,
and Tiron.
(3) Compounds Having Both the Structures (1) and (2)
(3-1) Ethylenediaminedi-o-hydroxyphenylacetic Acid [EDDHA] and Derivatives Thereof
[0041] Examples thereof include nitrogen-containing aromatic carboxylic acids such as ethylenediaminedi-o-hydroxyphenylacetic
acid [EDDHA], ethylenediamine-N,N'-bis[(2-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)acetic acid] [EDDHMA],
ethylenediamine-N,N'-bis[(2-hydroxy-5-chlorophenyl)acetic acid] [EDDHCA], and ethylenediamine-N,N'-bis[(2-hydroxy-5-sulfophenyl)acetic
acid] [EDDHSA]; and nitrogen-containing aromatic phosphonic acids such as ethylenediamine-N,N'-bis[(2-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)phosphonic
acid] and ethylenediamine-N,N'-bis[(2-hydroxy-5-phosphophenyl)-phosphonic acid].
(3-2) N,N'-Bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic Acid [HBED] and Derivatives
thereof
[0042] Examples thereof include N,N'-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid
[HBED], N,N'-bis(2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid [HMBED],
and N,N'-bis(2-hydroxy-5-chlorobenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid.
(4) Others
[0043] Other examples include amines such as ethylenediamine, 8-quinolinol, and o-phenanthroline;
carboxylic acids such as formic acid, acetic acid, oxalic acid, and tartaric acid;
hydrogen halides or salts thereof, such as hydrofluoric acid, hydrochloric acid, hydrogen
bromide, and hydrogen iodide; and oxoacids and salts thereof, such as phosphoric acid
and condensed phosphoric acids.
[0044] Those complexing agents may be used in the form of an acid or a salt, e.g., ammonium
salt.
[0045] Preferred of those complexing agents from the standpoints of cleaning effect, chemical
stability, etc. are nitrogen-containing carboxylic acids such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid [EDTA] and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid [DTPA]; nitrogen-containing phosphonic
acids such as ethylenediaminetetrakis(methylenephosphonic acid) [EDTPO] and propylenediaminetetra(methylenephosphonic
acid) [PDTMP]; ethylenediaminedi-o-hydroxyphenylacetic acid [EDDHA] and derivatives
thereof; and N,N'-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid [HBED].
[0046] Especially preferred of those from the standpoint of cleaning effect are ethylenediaminedi-o-hydroxyphenylacetic
acid [EDDHA], ethylenediamine-N,N'-bis[(2-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)acetic acid] [EDDHMA],
diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid [DTPA], ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA],
and propylenediaminetetra(methylenephosphonic acid) [PDTMP].
[0047] Those complexing agents may be used alone or in combination of two or more thereof
in any desired ratio. The concentration of the complexing agent in the cleaning liquid
medium of the invention may be selected at will according to the kind and amount of
the contaminant metal impurity and the level of cleanness required of the substrate
surface. However, it is generally preferably from 1 to 10,000 ppm by weight, more
preferably from 5 to 1,000 ppm by weight, most preferably from 10 to 200 ppm by weight.
In case where the concentration thereof is too low, the contaminant-removing effect
and adhesion-preventing effect of the complexing agent cannot be obtained. On the
other hand, too high concentrations thereof are undesirable in that not only the effects
are not enhanced any more and such high concentrations are uneconomical, but also
there is a stronger possibility that the complexing agent might remain adherent to
the substrate surface after the surface treatment.
[0048] Complexing agents of the ordinary reagent grades on the market may contain metal
impurities, e.g., Fe, in an amount of about from 1 ppm to several thousand ppm. Consequently,
there is the possibility that the complexing agent to be used in the invention might
be a metal contamination source. In an initial stage, such metal impurities are present
in the form of a stable complex with the complexing agent. However, while the complexing
agent is used as a surface-treating agent over a prolonged period of time, it decomposes
to release the metals, which adhere to the substrate surface. Because of this, the
content of each of the metal impurities, e.g., Fe, Al, and Cu, contained in the complexing
agent to be used in the invention is reduced beforehand to preferably 5 ppm or less,
more preferably 2 ppm or less. For obtaining a complexing agent purified to such a
degree, purification may be conducted, for example, by dissolving a complexing agent
in an acidic or alkaline solution, filtering the resultant solution to remove any
insoluble impurities, neutralizing the filtrate to precipitate crystals again, and
separating the crystals from the liquid.
[0049] In the cleaning liquid medium of the invention, any desired alkali ingredient can
be used even when the cleaning liquid medium contains a complexing agent. However,
preferred alkali ingredients for use in the cleaning liquid medium containing a complexing
agent are ammonium hydroxide, tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH), trimethyl-(hydroxyethyl)ammonium
hydroxide (common name: choline), and the like from the standpoints of reduced residual
metal amount, profitability, cleaning liquid medium stability, etc. Especially preferred
is ammonium hydroxide.
[0050] The cleaning liquid medium of the invention has a pH of 10 to 11.5. A known pH regulator
may be used as long as the effects of the invention are not lessened thereby. In case
where the pH of the cleaning liquid medium is too low, the ability to remove particles
and the ability to prevent particle adhesion are insufficient. Even when the pH thereof
is too high, not only the effects are not enhanced any more and the necessity of a
large amount of an alkali is uneconomical, but also there is a stronger possibility
that the substrate surface might be damaged by etching.
[0051] The cleaning liquid medium of the invention may further contain other ingredients.
Examples of such ingredients include organic sulfur-containing compounds (e.g., 2-mercaptothiazoline,
2-mercaptoimidazoline, 2-mercaptoethanol, and thioglycerol), organic nitrogen-containing
compounds (e.g., benzotriazole, 3-aminotriazole, N(R)
3 (wherein R is an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms), N(ROH)
3 (wherein R is an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms), urea, and thiourea), water-soluble
polymers (e.g., polyethylene glycol and poly(vinyl alcohol)), anticorrosive agents
such as alkyl alcohol compounds (ROH (wherein R is an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon
atoms)), acids such as sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and hydrofluoric acid, pH
buffers such as ammonium fluoride and ammonium phosphate, reducing agents such as
hydrazine, dissolved gases such as hydrogen, argon, nitrogen, and ozone, and known
surfactants/organic solvents.
[0052] When the cleaning liquid medium of the invention is used to clean a substrate, an
exceedingly high particle-removing effect is obtained only through one-step cleaning.
However, cleaning may be conducted in two or more steps using the cleaning liquid
medium of the invention in combination with one or more other cleaning liquid mediums
according to the kinds of contaminants desired to be further removed. Examples of
such optional cleaning liquid mediums include a cleaning liquid medium containing
hydrofluoric acid, a hydrochloric acid/hydrogen peroxide/water mixture ("SC-2 cleaning
liquid medium" or "APM cleaning liquid medium"), a sulfuric acid/hydrogen peroxide
mixture ("SPM cleaning liquid medium" or "piranha cleaning liquid medium"), ozonized
ultrapure water, and hydrogenated ultrapure water. In particular, a combination of
cleaning with a cleaning liquid medium containing hydrofluoric acid and cleaning with
the cleaning liquid medium of the invention is preferred in that the metallic contaminants,
particulate contaminants, and organic contaminants present on the substrate surface
can be efficiently removed in a short time period. Cleaning with a cleaning liquid
medium containing hydrofluoric acid is preferably conducted under the conditions of
a hydrofluoric acid concentration of from 0.03 to 3% by weight and a cleaning time
of from 1 second to 5 minutes. It is especially preferred to conduct this cleaning
under such conditions that the cleaning time is 45 seconds or shorter and the hydrofluoric
acid concentration (C), % by weight, and the cleaning time (t), second, satisfy the
relationship 0.25≤tC
1.29≤5. This is because use of such cleaning conditions has the following excellent effects:
metallic contaminants can be sufficiently removed in an extremely short time period
and almost no side effects are produced such as water marks, particle readhesion,
and dimensional change through the treatment due to etching.
[0053] For the cleaning liquid medium of the invention and the cleaning method using the
same, the substrate to be cleaned may be any of various substrates. Of these, the
substrates which are made of semiconductors, glasses, metals, ceramics, resins, magnetic
materials, superconductors, or the like and in which particulate contaminants are
problematic are suitable for the surface cleaning. In particular, the cleaning liquid
medium and cleaning method of the invention are suitable for the cleaning of substrates
for semiconductor devices and substrates for display devices, which are required to
have exceedingly high surface cleanness. Examples of the materials of such substrates
and of the materials of wirings, electrodes, and the like present on the surface thereof
include semiconductor materials such as Si, Ge (germanium), and GaAs (gallium-arsenic);
insulating materials such as SiO
2, silicon nitride, hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ), glasses, aluminum oxide, transition
metal oxides (e.g., titanium oxide, tantalum oxide, hafnium oxide, and zirconium oxide),
(Ba, Sr)TiO
3 (BST), polyimides, and organic thermoset resins; and metals such as W (tungsten),
Cu (copper), Cr (chromium), Co (cobalt), Mo (molybdenum), Ru (ruthenium), Au (gold),
Pt (platinum), Ag (silver), and Al (aluminum) and alloys of these metals, silicides,
and nitrides.
[0054] In particular, semiconductor device substrates having a semiconductor material such
as silicon or an insulating material such as silicon nitride, silicon oxide, or a
glass on part or all of the surface are highly strongly desired to be reduced in contamination
with fine particles. The cleaning method of the invention is hence suitable for application
to these substrates.
[0055] For preparing the cleaning liquid medium of the invention, known techniques may be
used. The cleaning liquid medium may be prepared by mixing beforehand two or more
of constituent ingredients for the cleaning liquid medium (e.g., a surfactant, ammonium
hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, water, and optional ingredients including a complexing
agent) and then mixing the resultant mixture with the remaining ingredients. Alternatively,
all the ingredients may be mixed at a time.
[0056] In the cleaning method of the invention, the cleaning liquid medium is brought into
direct contact with a substrate. Examples of techniques for contacting the cleaning
liquid medium with the substrate include: a dipping method in which a cleaning tank
is filled with the cleaning liquid medium and the substrate is immersed therein; a
spinning method in which the substrate is rotated at a high speed while allowing the
cleaning liquid medium fed through a nozzle to flow over the substrate; and a spraying
method in which the cleaning liquid medium is sprayed over the substrate to clean
it. Examples of apparatus usable for conducting such cleaning operations include a
batch cleaning apparatus in which two or more substrates placed in a cassette are
simultaneously cleaned and a sheet-by-sheet cleaning apparatus in which one substrate
attached to a holder is cleaned. The cleaning method of the invention is applicable
to any of the techniques described above. It is, however, preferred to apply the cleaning
method of the invention to, in particular, the sheet-by-sheet cleaning apparatus,
in which a reduction in cleaning period and a reduction in cleaning liquid medium
amount are desired. The cleaning method of the invention satisfies these desires.
It is also preferred to apply the cleaning method of the invention to the batch cleaning
apparatus because a higher particle-removing effect is obtained.
[0057] Although the cleaning may be conducted at room temperature, it may be performed with
heating for the purpose of improving the cleaning effect. The cleaning is conducted
at a temperature in the range of generally from room temperature to 90°C, preferably
from 40 to 80°C.
[0058] The time period of this cleaning is generally from 30 seconds to 30 minutes, preferably
from 1 to 15 minutes, in the case of batch cleaning, and is generally from 1 second
to 5 minutes, preferably from 15 seconds to 1 minute, in the case of sheet-by-sheet
cleaning. Too short time periods result in an insufficient cleaning effect. In case
where the cleaning period is prolonged excessively, this results only in a reduced
throughput and no effect compensating for the prolongation of cleaning period is expected.
[0059] The cleaning with the cleaning liquid medium may be conducted in combination with
cleaning with a physical force, e.g., mechanical cleaning by scrubbing with a cleaning
brush or ultrasonic cleaning. In particular, use of ultrasound irradiation or brush
scrubbing in combination with the cleaning with the cleaning liquid medium is preferred
in that the ability to remove particulate contaminants is further improved, leading
to a reduction in cleaning time period. It is especially preferred to irradiate the
substrate with an ultrasound having a frequency of 0.5 MHz or higher because this
irradiation and the surfactant produce a synergistic effect to greatly improve the
ability to remove particles on a 0.1 µm level.
[0060] The other substrate surface cleaning liquid medium of the invention will be explained
next.
[0061] The other substrate surface cleaning liquid medium of the invention is a cleaning
liquid medium which, when used for cleaning a substrate surface, attains a percentage
removal of particles of 94% or higher after the cleaning with respect to the removal
of particles having a particle diameter of 0.06 µm or larger, i.e., fine particles
such as, e.g., silica particles, alumina particles present on the surface, and which,
when used for cleaning a substrate surface having a silicon thermal oxide film thereon,
etches the silicon thermal oxide film to a depth of 1 nm or less.
[0062] The term "after the cleaning" as used for specifying this substrate surface cleaning
liquid medium of the invention means that the substrate surface has been contacted
with this substrate surface cleaning liquid medium. More specifically, that term means
that the substrate surface has been in contact with the cleaning liquid medium for
at least 1 minute. In this contact, the substrate surface cleaning liquid medium may
be stationary or flowing. Any desired method may be used for the contact, and examples
thereof include the dipping method, spinning method, and spraying method described
above.
[0063] This substrate surface cleaning liquid medium of the invention is also characterized
in that when the cleaning liquid medium is used for cleaning a substrate surface having
a silicon thermal oxide film thereon, it etches the silicon thermal oxide film to
a depth of 1 nm or less.
[0064] This substrate surface cleaning liquid medium of the invention produces an excellent
effect with respect to each of the ability to remove particles from the substrate
surface even in cleaning at a relatively low temperature of about from room temperature
to 50°C and the property of inhibiting the silicon thermal oxide film from being etched.
[0065] In particular, this cleaning liquid medium preferably is one which after the cleaning
attains a percentage removal of particles of 94% or higher when the temperature thereof
during contact with the substrate surface was 60°C or lower, desirably 50°C or lower.
In this cleaning, too low cleaning liquid medium temperatures may result in reduced
cleaning performance. Consequently, the temperature thereof is preferably not lower
than room temperature, more preferably 40°C or higher.
[0066] This substrate surface cleaning liquid medium of the invention may suitably be acidic,
neutral, or alkaline according to the substrate to be cleaned. However, the cleaning
liquid medium preferably is alkaline because the alkaline cleaning liquid medium has
the excellent ability to remove particles.
[0067] This substrate surface cleaning liquid medium of the invention has the substrate
surface cleaning liquid medium composition according to the invention described above.
Namely, it preferably comprises the following ingredients (A), (B), (C), (D), and
(E), has a pH of 10 to 11.5, and has a content of ingredient (C) of from 0.01 to 4%
by weight.
- (A) An ethylene oxide addition type surfactant polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers represented
by formula (2) :
R2O-(CH2CH2O)nH (2)
wherein R2 represents an alkyl group having 1 to 30 carbon atoms which may have one or more
substituents selected from the group consisting of a hydroxy groups, an amino group,
an alkoxy group having 1 to 30 carbon atoms, and n is a natural number of 50 or less,
in which the ratio of the number of carbon atoms contained in the hydrocarbon group
(m) to the number of oxyethylene groups in the polyoxyethylene group (n), i.e., m/n,
is 1.5 or less,
- (B) an alkali ingredient,
- (C) hydrogen peroxide, and
- (D) water, and (E) a complexing agent.
[0068] Specific embodiments of the invention will be explained below by reference to Examples.
However, the invention should not be construed as being limited to the following Examples
in any way unless the invention departs from the spirit thereof.
Preparation of Contaminated Silicon Wafer
[0069] A 4-inch silicon wafer was immersed in an acidic aqueous solution having a pH of
about 3 containing dispersed therein Si
3N
4 particles having particle diameters of about from 0.05 to 3 µm and an average particle
diameter of about 0.3 µm in a concentration of 0.05 mg/ℓ.
[0070] After the immersion, the silicon wafer was rinsed with ultrapure water for 10 minutes
and dried with nitrogen blowing or a spin-drier. Thus, a silicon wafer contaminated
with Si
3N
4 particles was obtained.
[0071] Silicon wafer analysis for Si
3N
4 particles present thereon was conducted in the following manner. The contaminated
silicon wafer and silicon wafers which had been cleaned were analyzed by the same
method. A laser surface analyzer (LS-5000, manufactured by Hitachi Engineering Co.,
Ltd.) was used to count the Si
3N
4 particles. In preparing the contaminated silicon wafer, the number of the Si
3N
4 particles present on the silicon wafer was regulated so as to be in the range of
from 2,000 to 10,000 per 4-inch silicon wafer.
EXAMPLE 1 (Reference Example) AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
[0072] The silicon wafer contaminated with Si
3N
4 particles was cleaned for particle removal with an APM 1 cleaning liquid medium (cleaning
liquid medium consisting of an aqueous solution prepared by mixing 29% by weight ammonia
water, 31% by weight aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution, and water in a ratio of 1/2/40
by volume) or with a cleaning liquid medium prepared by adding the surfactant shown
in Table 1 to the APM 1. These two cleaning liquid mediums had a pH of about 10.5.
The liquid medium temperature and the cleaning time were regulated to 70°C and 10
minutes, respectively, and ultrasound irradiation was not conducted. The cleaning
was conducted by the dip cleaning method.
[0073] The number of the Si
3N
4 particles remaining on the surface of the cleaned silicon wafer obtained was counted,
and the contaminant particle-removing ability of the cleaning liquid medium was evaluated
in the following five grades based on the degree of removal determined from that number.
The degrees of removal of 90% and higher are indicated by removing ability AAA, those
of from 70% to less than 90% are indicated by AA, those of from 50% to less than 70%
are indicated by A, those of from 30% to less than 50% are indicated by B, and those
less than 30% are indicated by C. The results obtained are shown in Table 1.
[0074] The solubility of ingredient (A) in each cleaning liquid medium was evaluated based
on the following criteria. When a cleaning liquid medium placed in a rectangular quartz
vessel with a capacity of about 4 ℓ to a depth of about 10 cm had the same clarity
as the cleaning liquid medium containing no ingredient (A), the solubility of the
ingredient (A) in this cleaning liquid medium was rated as good. When a cleaning liquid
medium thus placed in the vessel had no clarity, i.e., was turbid, e.g., milk-white,
then the solubility of the ingredient (A) in this cleaning liquid medium was rated
as poor. The results obtained are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
| |
Cleaning agent ingredients |
pH of cleaning liquid medium |
Ultrasonic irradiation |
Solubility |
Particle-removing ability |
| Surfactant (A) |
Alkali ingredient (B) Kind |
Hydrogen peroxide (C) Concentration (wt%) |
| Structural formula |
m |
n |
m/n |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
| Example 1 |
C12H25O-
(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
33 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
not conducted |
good |
A |
| Comparative Example 1 |
nil |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
not conducted |
good |
C |
Cleaning method, dip cleaning; Kind of APM, APM 1; Cleaning liquid medium temperature,
70°C; Cleaning time, 10 min
Example 1 is a Reference Example |
[0075] Table 1 shows that the surfactant according to the invention had distinctly good
solubility and the cleaning liquid medium containing this surfactant had a satisfactory
particulate-contaminant-removing ability.
EXAMPLE 2 (Reference Example) AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
[0076] Cleaning was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1, except that use was made
of the same APM 1 cleaning liquid medium as in Example 1 or a cleaning liquid medium
prepared by adding the surfactant shown in Table 2 to the APM 1, and that ultrasonic
irradiation was conducted. For the ultrasonic irradiation was used HI MEGA SONIC (600
W, 950 kHz), manufactured by Kaijo Corp. Those two cleaning liquid mediums had a pH
of about 10.5. The results obtained are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
| |
Cleaning agent ingredients |
pH of cleaning liquid medium |
Ultrasonic irradiation |
Solubility |
Particle-removing ability |
| Surfactant (A) |
Alkali ingredient (B) Kind |
Hydrogen peroxide (C) Concentration (wt%) |
| Structural formula |
m |
n |
m/n |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
| Example 2 |
C12H25O-
(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
33 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
mout about 10.5 |
con ducted |
good |
AAA |
| Comparative Example 2 |
nil |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
conducted |
good |
A |
Cleaning method, dip cleaning; Kind of APM, ARM 1; Cleaning liquid medium temperature,
70°C; Cleaning time, 10 min
Example 2 is a Reference Example |
[0077] Table 2 shows that the surfactant according to the invention had distinctly good
solubility and the cleaning liquid medium containing this surfactant had a satisfactory
particle-removing ability.
EXAMPLE 3 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
[0078] Cleaning was conducted in the same manner as in Example 2, except that use was made
of the same APM 1 cleaning liquid medium as in Example 2 or a cleaning liquid medium
prepared by adding the surfactant and complexing agent shown in Table 2 to the APM
1. Cleaning for removing metallic contaminants was further conducted in the following
manner.
Preparation of Contaminated Silicon Wafer
[0079] A 4-inch silicon wafer was immersed in an APM cleaning liquid medium containing ions
of metals (Fe and Cu). The APM cleaning liquid medium was prepared by mixing 29% by
weight ammonia water, 31% by weight aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution, and water
in a ratio of 1/1/5 by volume. The metal ion-containing APM cleaning liquid medium
was prepared by adding metal ion-containing aqueous solutions to that APM cleaning
liquid medium in such amounts as to result in an Fe content of 20 ppb and a Cu content
of 1 ppm.
[0080] After the immersion, the silicon wafer was rinsed with ultrapure water for 10 minutes
and dried with nitrogen blowing. Thus, a silicon wafer contaminated with metals was
obtained.
[0081] Silicon wafer analysis for metals (Fe and Cu) present thereon was conducted in the
following manner. The contaminated silicon wafer and silicon wafers which had been
cleaned were analyzed by the same method. The metals present on the surface of each
wafer were recovered with an aqueous solution containing 0.1% by weight hydrofluoric
acid and 1% by weight hydrogen peroxide. This solution was then analyzed with an inductively-coupled-plasma
mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) to determine the amount of each metal, which was converted
to concentration on the substrate surface (atoms/cm
2). The thus-obtained results of the analysis of the contaminated silicon wafer are
shown in Table 3.
[0082] The silicon wafer contaminated with metals was cleaned for metal removal with an
APM 2 cleaning liquid medium (cleaning liquid medium consisting of an aqueous solution
prepared by mixing 29% by weight ammonia water, 31% by weight aqueous hydrogen peroxide
solution, and water in a ratio of 1/1/30 by volume) or with a cleaning liquid medium
prepared by adding the surfactant and complexing agent shown in Table 3 to the APM
2. These two cleaning liquid mediums had a pH of about 10.5. The liquid medium temperature
and the cleaning time were regulated to 60°C and 10 minutes, respectively, and the
cleaning was conducted by the dip cleaning method. The amounts of the metals (Fe and
Cu) remaining on the cleaned silicon wafer surface are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
| |
Cleaning agent ingredients |
pH of cleaning liquid medium |
Solubility |
Particle-removing ability |
Metal-removing ability Concentration (x1010 atoms/cm |
| Surfactant (A) |
Alkali ingredient (B) Kind |
Hydrogen peroxide (C) Concentration (wt%) |
Complexing agent |
| Structural formula |
m |
n |
m/n |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
Kind |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
Fe |
Cu |
| Example 3 |
C12H25O-
(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
33 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
EDDHA |
28 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AAA |
<0.1 |
<0.1 |
| Comparative Example 2 |
nil |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
- |
0 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
500 |
3 |
| Before cleaning (silicon wafer contaminated with metals) |
1000 to 3000 |
3000 to 5000 |
Cleaning method, dip cleaning; Cleaning time, 10 min
"Particle removal" 1/2/40; cleaning liquid medium temperature, 70°C
"Metal removal" 1/1/30; cleaning liquid medium temperature, 60°C |
[0083] Table 3 shows that the surfactant according to the invention had distinctly good
solubility and the cleaning liquid medium containing this surfactant in combination
with the complexing agent had a satisfactory particulate-contaminant-removing ability
and satisfactory contaminant-metal-removing ability.
EXAMPLES 4 TO 10 (Reference Examples) AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 3 TO 5
[0084] Cleaning was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1, except that use was made
of an APM 3 cleaning liquid medium (cleaning liquid medium consisting of an aqueous
solution prepared by mixing 29% by weight ammonia water, 31% by weight aqueous hydrogen
peroxide solution, and water in a ratio of 1/2/60 by volume) or cleaning liquid mediums
prepared by adding each of the surfactants shown in Table 4 to the APM 3, that the
cleaning was conducted with a sheet-by-sheet cleaning apparatus at a liquid medium
temperature of room temperature for a cleaning time of 30 seconds, and that ultrasonic
irradiation was used in combination with the cleaning.
[0085] This cleaning with a sheet-by-sheet cleaning apparatus was conducted by the general
method. The specific procedure is as follows. While the contaminated silicon wafer
was kept being revolved in the circumferential direction, each cleaning liquid medium
was continuously applied to the wafer surface at a constant flow rate for a given
period (cleaning time) to clean the surface. Immediately after the cleaning, the silicon
wafer was rinsed with ultrapure water and spin-dried to obtain a cleaned silicon wafer.
The rotational speed of the silicon wafer was 600 rpm, and the flow rate of the cleaning
liquid medium was 1 ℓ/min. The cleaning liquid mediums each had a pH of about 10.5.
The results obtained are shown in Table 4.
[0086] The cleaning liquid mediums in which the solubility of the surfactant was "poor"
had the high possibility that the insoluble ingredient might contaminate the substrate
for devices and thus reduce device performance or yield. Because of this, these cleaning
liquid mediums were not evaluated for particulate-contaminant-removing ability. The
same applies also to Comparative Example 6.
Table 4
| |
Cleaning agent ingredients |
pH of cleaning liquid medium |
Solubility |
Particle-removing ability |
| Surfactant (A) |
Alkali ingredient (B) Kind |
Hydrogen peroxide (C) Concentration (wt%) |
| Structural formula |
m |
n |
m/n |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
| Example 4 |
C12H25O(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AA |
| Example 5 |
C12H25O (C2H4O) 11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
30 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AA |
| Example 6 |
C12H25O(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
20 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AA |
| Example 7 |
C12H25O(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
10 |
ammonium hydroxides |
1 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
| Example 8 |
C12H25O (C2H4O)13H |
12 |
13 |
0.9 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AA |
| Example 9 |
C9H17O(C2H4O)8H |
8 |
8 |
1.0 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
| Example 10 |
C18H35O(C2H4O)30H |
18 |
30 |
0.6 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10. 5 |
good |
A |
| Comparative Example 3 |
nil |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
good |
B |
| Comparative Example 4 |
C12H25O (C2H4O) 4H |
12 |
4 |
3 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
poor |
not conducted |
| Comparative Example 5 |
C12H25O(C2H4O)5H |
12 |
5 |
2.4 |
100. |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
poor |
not conducted |
Cleansing method, sheet-by-sheet cleaning; Kind of APM, APM 3; Cleaning temperature,
room temperature; Cleaning time, 30 sec
Examples 4 to 10 are Reference Examples |
[0087] Table 4 shows that the surfactants according to the invention had distinctly good
solubility and the cleaning liquid mediums containing these surfactants had a satisfactory
particulate-contaminant-removing ability.
EXAMPLE 11 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3
[0088] Cleaning for particulate-contaminant removal was conducted in the same manner as
in Example 4, except that use was made of the same APM 3 cleaning liquid medium as
in Example 4 or a cleaning liquid medium prepared by adding the surfactant and complexing
agent shown in Table 5 to the APM 3. Furthermore, cleaning for metallic-contaminant
removal was conducted in the same manner as in Example 3, except that use was made
of the same APM 1 cleaning liquid medium as in Example 1 or a cleaning liquid medium
prepared by adding the surfactant and complexing agent shown in Table 5 to the APM
1. The cleaning time and cleaning liquid medium temperature were regulated to 60 seconds
and 80°C, respectively. Those cleaning liquid mediums each had a pH of about 10.5.
Table 5
| |
Cleaning agent ingredients |
pH of cleaning liquid ity medium |
Solubility |
Particle-removing ability |
Metal-removing ability Concentration (x1010 atoms/cm2) |
| Surfactant (A) |
Alkali ingredient (B) Kind |
Hydrogen peroxide (C) Concentration (wt%) |
Complexing agent |
| Structural formula |
m |
n |
m/n |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
Kind |
Concentration (ppm) |
Fe |
Cu |
| Example 11 |
C12H25O-
(C2H4O)11 |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
EDDHA |
70 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AA |
9.5 |
<0.1 |
| Comparative Example 3 |
nil |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
- |
- |
about 10.5 |
good |
B |
>1000 |
3 |
| Before cleaning (silicon wafer contaminated with metals) |
1000 to 3000 |
3000 to 5000 |
Cleaning method, sheet-by-sheet cleaning
"Particle removal" 1/2/60; cleaning time, 30 sec; cleaning liquid medium temperature,
room temperature
"Metal removal" 1/2/40; cleaning time, 60 see; cleaning liquid medium temperature,
80°C |
[0089] Table 5 shows that the surfactant according to the invention had distinctly good
solubility and the cleaning liquid mediums containing this surfactant in combination
with the complexing agent had a satisfactory particulate-contaminant-removing ability
and satisfactory metallic-contaminant-removing ability
EXAMPLES 12 AND 13 (Reference Examples) AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 6
[0090] Cleaning was conducted in the same manner as in Example 4, except that use was made
of the same APM 3 cleaning liquid medium as in Example 4 or cleaning liquid mediums
prepared by adding each of the compounds shown in Table 6 to the APM 3, and that the
cleaning liquid medium temperature and cleaning time were regulated to 50°C and 60
seconds, respectively. Those cleaning liquid mediums each had a pH of about 10.5.
The results obtained are shown in Table 6.
Table 6
| |
Cleaning agent ingredients |
pH of cleaning liquid medium |
Solubility |
Particle-removing ability |
| Surfactant (A) |
Alkali ingredient (B) Kind |
Hydrogen peroxide (C) Concentration (wt%) |
| Structural formula |
m |
n |
m/n |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
| Example 12 |
C12H25O-
(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AAA |
| Example 13 |
C8H17O-
(C2H4O)8H |
8 |
8 |
1.0 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AA |
| Comparative Example 6 |
C12H25O-
(C2H4O)7H |
12 |
7 |
1.7 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
poor |
not conducted |
Cleaning method, sheet-by-sheet cleaning; Kind of MM, APM 3; Cleaning temperature,
50°C; Cleaning time, 60 sec
Examples 12 and 13 are Reference Examples |
[0091] Table 6 shows that the surfactants according to the invention had distinctly good
solubility and the cleaning liquid mediums containing these surfactants had a satisfactory
particulate-contaminant-removing ability.
EXAMPLES 14 TO 24 (Reference Examples) AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 7 TO 11
"Evaluation of Ability to Remove Fine Contaminant Particles ≥0.06 µm)"
[0092] A 4-inch silicon wafer to which from 7,000 to 12,000 Si
3N
4 particles having a diameter of 0.06 µm or larger were adhered as a substrate was
cleaned with the APM 1 cleaning liquid medium or cleaning liquid mediums prepared
by adding each of the surfactants shown in Table 7 to the APM 1 by means of a sheet-by-sheet
cleaning apparatus to remove particles. This cleaning was conducted under the conditions
of a silicon wafer rotational speed of 1,000 rpm, cleaning liquid medium feed rate
of 1 ℓ/min, cleaning time of 60 seconds, and liquid medium temperature of 50°C. Ultrasonic
irradiation was used in combination with the cleaning. Those cleaning liquid mediums
each had a pH of about 10.5.
[0093] With respect to silicon wafer analysis for particles present thereon, a laser surface
analyzer (LS-6600, manufactured by Hitachi Engineering Co., Ltd.) was used to count
the particles.
[0094] The number of the particles remaining on the surface of each cleaned silicon wafer
obtained through the cleaning was counted, and the degree of contaminant-particle
removal was determined therefrom and evaluated in the following five grades.
[0095] Namely, the degrees of removal of 90% and higher are indicated by removing ability
AAA, those of from 70% to less than 90% are indicated by AA, those of from 50% to
less than 70% are indicated by A, those of from 30% to less than 50% are indicated
by B, and those less than 30% are indicated by C. The results obtained are shown in
Table 7.
"Evaluation of Solubility"
[0096] The solubility of the surfactant (A) in each cleaning liquid medium was evaluated
based on the following criteria. When a cleaning liquid medium placed in a rectangular
quartz vessel with a capacity of about 4 ℓ to a depth of about 10 cm had the same
clarity as the cleaning liquid medium to which the surfactant (A) had not been added,
then the solubility of the surfactant (A) in this cleaning liquid medium was rated
as good. When a cleaning liquid medium thus placed in the vessel had no clarity, i.e.,
was turbid, e.g., milk-white, then the solubility of the surfactant (A) in this cleaning
liquid medium was rated as poor. Also with respect to the cleaning liquid mediums
in which the surfactant (A) was in an incompletely dissolved state, the solubility
of the surfactant (A) was rated as poor. The results obtained are shown in Table 7.
As stated under "Examples 4 to 10 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5", the cleaning liquid
mediums in which the solubility of the surfactant was "poor" were not subjected to
the evaluation of particulate-contaminant-removing ability.
Table 7
| |
Cleaning agent ingredients |
pH of cleaning liquid medium |
Solubility |
Particle-removing ability |
| Surfactant (A) |
Alkali ingredient (B) Kind |
Hydrogen peroxide (C) Concentration (wt%) |
| Structural formula |
m |
n |
m/n |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
| Example 14 |
C8H17O(C2H4O)20H |
8 |
20 |
0.4 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
| Example 15 |
C12H25O(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AA |
| Example 16 |
C12H2C4(C2HO)20H |
12 |
20 |
0.6 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
| Example 17 |
C12H25O(C2H4O)23H |
12 |
23 |
0.5 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
| Example 18 |
C12H25O(C2H4O)30H |
12 |
30 |
0.4 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
| Example 19 |
C13H27O(C2H4O)8.5H |
13 |
8.5 |
1.5 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AA |
| Example 20 |
C16H33O(C2H4O)15H |
16 |
15 |
1.1 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
AA |
| Example 21 |
C16H33O(C2H4O)23H |
16 |
23 |
0.7 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
| Example 22 |
C18H37O(C2H4O)15H |
18 |
15 |
1.2 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
| Example 23 |
C18H37O(C2H4O)30H |
18 |
30 |
0.6 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
B |
| Example 24 |
C18H37O(C2H4O)50H |
18 |
50 |
0.4 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
good |
A |
| Comparative Example 7 |
nil |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
- |
C |
| Comparative Example 8 |
C8H17O(C2H4O) |
8 |
4 |
2.0 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
poor |
not conducted |
| Comparative Example 9 |
C13H27O(C2H4O)5H |
13 |
5 |
2.6 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
poor |
not conducted |
| Comparative Example 10 |
C16H3O(C2H4O)8H |
16 |
8 |
2.0 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
poor |
not conducted |
| Comparative Example 11 |
C18H37O(C2H4O)11H |
18 |
11 |
1.6 |
70 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
poor |
not conducted |
Cleaning method, sheet-by-sheet cleaning; Kind of APM, APM 1; Cleaning temperature,
50°C; Cleaning time, 60 sec
Examples 14 to 24 are Reference Examples |
[0097] Table 7 shows that the surfactants (A) according to a constituent requirement of
the invention had good solubility, and the cleaning liquid mediums of the invention
had a satisfactory particulate-contaminant-removing ability.
EXAMPLES 25 AND 26 (Reference Examples) AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 12 AND 13
[0098] A 6-inch silicon wafer to which from 4,000 to 5,000 SiO
2 particles having a diameter of 0.06 µm or larger were adhered as a substrate was
cleaned with the APM 1 cleaning liquid medium or a cleaning liquid medium prepared
by adding the surfactant shown in Table 8 to the APM 1 by the dip cleaning method
to remove particles. The cleaning time and temperatures used are shown in Table 8.
Ultrasonic irradiation was used in combination with the cleaning. For the ultrasonic
irradiation was used HI MEGA SONIC (600 W, 950 kHz), manufactured by Kaijo Corp. Those
two cleaning liquid mediums had a pH of about 10.5.
[0099] With respect to silicon wafer analysis for particles present thereon, a laser surface
analyzer (LS-6600, manufactured by Hitachi Engineering Co., Ltd.) was used to count
the particles. The degree of particle removal (%) determined therefrom is shown in
Table 8.
"Measurement of Etching Depth"
[0100] A silicon wafer piece having a thermal oxide film having a thickness of 1,000 Å was
immersed in a cleaning liquid medium, subsequently rinsed with running pure water
for 5 minutes, and then dried with N
2 blowing. The thickness of the film of the test piece was measured before and after
the cleaning, and the etching depth was calculated using the following equation.

[0101] For the film thickness measurement for the test piece, a light interference type
film thickness meter (NanoSpec L-6100, manufactured by Nanometrics, Inc.) was used.
The results obtained are shown in Table 8.
Table 8
| |
Kind of cleaning agent |
Cleaning agent ingredients |
pH of cleaning liquid medium |
Cleaning liquid medium temperature (°C) |
cleaning time (min) |
Etching depth (nm) |
Degree of particle removal (%) |
| Surfactant (A) |
|
Alkali ingredient (B) Kind |
Hydrogen peroxide (C) Concentration (wt%) |
| Structural formula |
m |
n |
m/n |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
| Example 25 |
APM 1 |
C12H25O-
(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
33 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
40 |
10 |
0.4 |
96 |
| Example 26 |
APM 1 |
C12H25O-
(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
33 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
50 |
10 |
0.7 |
97 |
| Comparative Example 12 |
APM 1 |
nil |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
50 |
10 |
0.7 |
91 |
| Comparative Example 13 |
APM1 |
nil |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1.4 |
about 10.5 |
80 |
10 |
2.8 |
94 |
Cleaning method, sheet-by-sheet cleaning; Kind of APM, APM 1
Examples 25 and 26 are Reference Examples. |
[0102] Table 8 shows that the cleaning liquid mediums of the invention attained distinctly
high degrees of removal of particles having a diameter of 0.06 µm or larger, which
were not lower than 94%, and the depths of etching caused by these were not larger
than 1 nm.
EXAMPLE 27 (Reference Example) AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 14
[0103] Cleaning was conducted in the same manner as in Example 12, except that use was made
of the APM 3 cleaning liquid medium or a cleaning liquid medium prepared by adding
the surfactant shown in Table 9 to the APM 3. An etching depth measurement was made
in the same manner as in Example 25. The results obtained are shown in Table 9.
Table 9
| |
Kind of cleaning agent |
Cleaning agent ingredients |
pH of cleaning liquid medium |
Cleaning liquid medium temperature (°C) |
Cleaning time (min) |
Etching depth (nm) |
Degree of particle removal (%) |
| Surfactant (A) |
|
Alkali ingredient (B) Kind |
Hydrogen peroxide (C) Concentration (wt%) |
| Structural formula |
m |
n |
m/n |
Concentration (wt ppm) |
| Example 27 |
APM 3 |
C12H25O-
(C2H4O)11H |
12 |
11 |
1.1 |
100 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
50 |
1 |
0.07 |
94 |
| Comparative Example 14 |
APM 3 |
nil |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
ammonium hydroxide |
1 |
about 10.5 |
50 |
1 |
0.07 |
86 |
Cleaning method, sheet-by-sheet cleaning; Kind of APM, APM 3
Example 27 is a Reference Example |
[0104] Table 9 shows that the cleaning liquid medium of the invention attained a distinctly
high degree of particle removal, which was not lower than 94%.
[0105] As apparent from the results given above, the cleaning liquid mediums of the invention
are superior in surfactant solubility and in the ability to remove particulate contaminants
to the conventional cleaning liquid mediums (Comparative Examples). Of these cleaning
liquid mediums, those containing a complexing agent in combination with the surfactant
are more preferred in that they have the improved ability to remove metallic contaminants
while having the intact surfactant solubility and particle-removing ability. Furthermore,
the cleaning liquid mediums of the invention are excellent cleaning liquid mediums
which attain an etching depth of 1 nm or smaller and a degree of particle removal
of 94% or higher with respect to the removal of fine particles having a diameter of
0.06 µm or larger.
[0106] With the cleaning liquid mediums of the invention, particulate contaminants present
on substrates to be cleaned, such as silicon wafers, can be efficiently removed to
a high degree in a short time period. Consequently, these cleaning liquid mediums
are exceedingly useful when industrially used in methods of contaminant removal in
steps in the production of semiconductor devices, display devices, or the like.