Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates generally to managing the brightness of displays such
as flat-panel displays.
Background of the Invention
[0002] Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs) are fundamentally transmissive devices, requiring
a backlight assembly to produce light that is then either transmitted or blocked on
a pixel-by-pixel basis. This is typically done by forming a light distribution system
behind the LCD pixels that extends the full length and width of the pixel array. Sometimes,
the backlight can simply be a reflector for collecting light that comes from the front
of the display and redirecting it back out (typically called reflective or transflective
displays), but for high-quality AM-TFT-LCDs the source of the light in the backlight
is usually one or more fluorescent lamps of various sizes or shapes, usually of the
type CCFL (Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp), also called CCFT (Cold Cathode Fluorescent
Tube).
[0003] As LCDs get larger and/or require more luminance (brightness) at their output, a
standard method of producing the additional light is to add more CCFTs. This makes
for a brighter display, but has several consequences, including increased power consumption,
and added difficulty in dimming the lamps to low enough levels to compensate for low-level
ambient illumination conditions.
[0004] CCFTs are high voltage AC devices that need special circuits to produce the required
voltages and frequencies to drive them properly. For the CCFTs commonly found, such
as for industrial home/business lighting needs, large ballast devices are commonly
used for driving the lamps at 50 or 60Hz. However, for LCD displays, additional demands
require sophisticated solutions to problems such as having a low voltage DC source,
small size requirements for implementation, higher frequencies to ensure no optical
interference with the display, and preferably a wide range of dimming.
[0005] A wide range of dimming is often desirable as LCD displays may be used in dim environments,
and the default output can be quite bright for some users. Currently, LCD displays
cannot be dimmed over a range comparable to standard CRT displays, yet their brightness
can be several times that of CRTs. The most common method of dimming the CCFTs for
most high-quality LCD assemblies is an inverter, an inverse method of common power
conversion, in that it takes DC as its input and converts it to AC output. Common
inverters are used to convert automobile battery voltages to AC 115 voltages, such
as for using normal home appliances in vehicles. In these cases, output level control
is rarely needed, and if so, then only over a limited voltage range.
[0006] The inverter used for CCFTs for LCDs is typically much more specialized, taking DC
levels and converting them to high AC voltages, usually well over 1kVolt, with a waveform
optimized for the types of fluorescent lamps or other illumination sources for which
they were designed. Unlike their vehicle counterparts, these inverters are generally
required to provide a wide range of dimming. This is quite a challenging task, and
the dimming limits are usually much less than would be desired. This can have a number
of negative effects, as will be explained in more detail below.
[0007] Typically, there are two types of inverter dimming methods. The first is direct AC
supplied voltage amplitude attenuation, and the second involves temporal signal processing,
such as by chopping the lamp waveform, like PWM (pulse-width modulation).
[0008] However, both of these methods suffer from limitations that occur when dimming the
lamps to their lower levels. Currently, undesirable side effects are often produced
at low levels, such as output luminance nonuniformities, degraded lamp life, and visual
artifacts, including temporal instabilities or optical interference seen in the LCD
displayed content. In such cases, controlling these side effects results in compromises,
often dimming the lamps to an extent less than desirable.
Summary of the Invention
[0009] The invention is as defined in the appended claims.
Brief Description of the Figures
[0010] Various embodiments of the invention will now be described in detail by way of example
only, with reference to the following drawings:
Figure 1 is a front view of an LCD display in accordance with one embodiment of the
present invention;
Figure 2 is a graphical representation of a dimming method in accordance with one
embodiment of the present invention; and
Figure 3 is another graphical representation of a dimming method in accordance with
one embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
[0011] Figure 1 is a front view of a display 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the
invention. Display 100 includes a screen 105 disposed within a housing 110, which
may be mounted on a base 115 or a multitude of other arrangements. The screen 105
may comprise a screen requiring a backlight for proper display, such as an LCD or
TFT-LCD screen or any other type of transmissive display technology as is known in
the art or may be developed.
[0012] The display 100 includes circuitry 125 containing a processor, memory, and associated
circuitry as is known in the art for operating the display 100 as described herein.
The display 100 also includes connectors and circuitry (not shown) known in the art
for interfacing with sources of video, such as computers. The dimming method described
herein may be implemented by way of discrete circuitry as is known in the art. Alternatively,
the dimming method may be implemented as a microprocessor-based solution, typically
with machine-readable instructions stored in the circuitry 125. The process may also
be implemented as a combination of both discrete circuitry and software as desired.
[0013] The display 100 also includes a ballast 130 for driving CCFTs 120. With the advent
of larger high quality LCDs, such as used for monitors, wall-mounted displays, home
entertainment, etc., more illuminance may be desired. In order to generate this high
brightness, often the number of CCFTs is increased to 2, 4, 6, 8 or even more. Typically,
but not always, the lamps are distributed in pairs, such as pair 120a, such that one
pair member is deployed about the top or side of the display at the edge of the light
distribution system, known as the backlight (not shown), with the other pair member
deployed on the opposite side of the display. Such an arrangement can more evenly
distribute the light across the light distribution system.
[0014] Though three pair sets of CCFTs are shown in FIG. 1, any number of pairs may be employed
as appropriate. The lamps may also be distributed in a non-symmetrical manner, such
as on various sides, in the rear of the LCD (rather than top, bottom, or side lit).
Futhermore, the lamps may comprise non-conventional CCFT light sources, including
serpentine or random configurations, flat lamps, LEDs, ELs or other types of light-generating
sources, including potentially a combination of illumination sources of different
types or technologies. Other potential methods of generating light in the backlight
assembly include various types of incandescent arrays, and even pixelated emissive
sources as in other display types, and so forth. It should also be noted that not
all the fluorescent lamps need be straight or of lengths that nearly match the horizontal
or vertical dimensions of the LCDs for side or backlighting methods. Thus the approach
described herein may apply to any variation or type of lighting for LCDs, when the
lighting scheme involves multiple or sectionalized illumination sources (such as multiple
cathode/anode devices, pixelated devices, and so forth).
[0015] In one embodiment described herein, pairs of lamps are utilized by taking advantage
of their numbers and selectively turning some off, while leaving others lit, so as
to minimize the amount of dimming work done by the inverters or other types of lamp
controllers. However, as stated, an analogous approach may be used for any configuration
in which multiple light sources are used to comprise an entire backlighting, sidelighting,
etc. system.
[0016] An inverter in existing systems is typically used to drive lamps to their lower extremes
using the methods described above, resulting in reduced performance in a number of
areas and a limited range of dimming. However, lamps and other illumination sources
typically perform best when driven at some optimum level of operations, often at or
near their highest output. Thus the prior art methods generally degrade a lamp's performance
by dimming the lamp to low operating levels, thereby reducing the quality of a display
compared to having lamps in their optimal (non-dimmed) states.
[0017] The present approach provides for decreasing the brightness of a display with little
degradation of the lamps or their visual quality. It is to be understood that such
an approach may used in conjunction with certain known prior art dimming methods,
thereby complementing them and extending their range dramatically. In addition, although
one embodiment of the invention uses a conventional inverter dimmer circuit, non-inverter
dimmer methods could be used instead where appropriate for the type of illumination
source employed.
[0018] In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a display may be dimmed
by selectively turning off some lamps, often in symmetrical sets, such as pairs, to
help balance more easily the luminance distribution. Depending upon a number of light
distribution or optical transmission characteristics, configuration dependencies,
and electronic circuit variables, the disclosed methods may potentially decrease the
luminance by a factor of n/m, where m is the total number of lamps or light sources,
and n is the number turned off. For one example, if a backlight assembly has 6 lamps
in 2 balanced sets of 3 and one lamp is turned off in each set, then the resultant
luminance output might be 4/6 or 66.7% of the initial brightness, assuming perfect
optical transmission and electrical efficiency, and other factors being constant.
[0019] FIG. 2 illustrates a dimming process in accordance with one embodiment of the invention,
typically utilized in conjunction with the display 100 of FIG. 1, which includes a
backlight assembly comprising 6 CCFTs 120, with 3 pair members each being disposed
about the top and bottom of the display 105, and an inverter 130 configured to dim
the output of the display to 50% of its initial luminance level.
[0020] FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of one aspect of the dimming process, with the
x-axis representing the overall output intensity of the display. The intensity decreases
from the brightest at the left to the dimmest level at the right. The y-axis represents
the number of lamps operating, with the level of dimming provided by the dimming circuitry
indicated.
[0021] At the beginning of the process of FIG. 2, at marker 200, the display is illuminated
to a first intensity state, typically with all lamps on, and the inverter dimming
is off, providing the highest output intensity for the display. To begin dimming the
intensity level of the display, the inverter drives the lamps down to a predetermined
level at marker 210. This level is preferably chosen to provide a satisfactory output
while not driving the lamps too close to their degraded performance level. In the
example of Figure 2, this level occurs at marker 210, representing about 2/3 or 66%
of the lamps' original intensity. In this example, where a dimmer circuit is used
that is capable of dimming by a total of 50%, a superior result is provided by driving
the luminance down only 33%, since the lamps and displays are not being driven close
to their degraded performance level.
[0022] If it is desired to dim the display further, the process continues to marker 220.
At this point, a pair of lamps (preferably one on top and one on the bottom) is turned
off, and the inverter is brought back to a full illumination state. The overall intensity
level at marker 220 is preferably close to the overall intensity level at marker 210.
Thus, the dimming level at marker 210 may also be chosen to correspond to the intensity
level provided when a first set of lamps is turned off, and the remaining lamps are
being driven at their full output level at marker 220.
[0023] At marker 220, the inverter is now driving only 4 of the 6 lamps, and the total output
luminance is again reduced by about 33%. To further dim the display, the conventional
dimming method is used again to drive the remaining 4 lamps to approximately 40-50%
of their full level. This takes us to the position of marker 240.
[0024] To further dim the display again, a next set of lamps is turned off (another pair
in this example) at marker 260, and the dimming circuit is reset for maximum output,
driving the 2 remaining lamps at full brightness. Thus, at marker 260, only 2 lamps
are being driven, providing about 33% of the original brightness. As mentioned above
for marker 220, the dimming level at marker 240 may be chosen to correspond to the
intensity level provided when the next set of lamps is turned off (at marker 260).
[0025] To dim the display to the lowest output level, a conventional dimming method may
be used to dim the remaining 2 lamps to approximately 50% of their level at marker
280, potentially achieving an overall luminance level of 0.33 x 0.5, or 0.165, i.e.
approximately 16.5% of the original output. Note that such a luminance reduction technique
provides luminance reduction over a range that is 3 times greater than the 50% range
that the dimmer alone is able to provide by dimming all 6 of the lamps together.
[0026] As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the specified output
levels and level of extending dimming mentioned in respect of the example of Figure
2 will vary with the types of lamps used, the dimmer circuitry employed, or the overall
number of lamps or types of illumination sources employed in the display.
[0027] It will be appreciated that the staggered dimming process described in relation to
Figure 2 provides a wide range of luminance, while conserving power, lamp life, and
minimizing optical degradation or interference, since the components of the display
are not driven too near their respective degradation points.
[0028] To minimize any noticeable steps in luminance when lamps are turned off, luminance
balancing should be predicted and accounted for in the level of luminance reduction
before lamps are turned off. Such balancing may be achieved through an electro-optical
prediction of the voltage-luminance transfer function. Alternatively, an empirical
characterization of the electro-optical system may be used to determine the luminance
levels at which the dimmed level matches the lamp cutoff level.
[0029] Additionally, to provide adequate control of the conventional dimming method for
the individual lamps, while avoiding undesirable effects when the CCFT lamp loads
are unbalanced, such as bleeding, crosstalk, leakage, or arcing, a feedback or loading
control as is known in the art may be implemented to allow for balanced drive of illuminated
lamps when others are turned off.
[0030] While the example of FIG. 2 shows the lamps being progressively dimmed the same approach
may be used to raise or lower the intensity level of the display as the user desires.
Additionally, it is contemplated that the system may be configured to store the present
intensity state of the display for recall on power up.
[0031] Figure 3 is another graphical representation of a dimming method in accordance with
one embodiment of the present invention. Figure 3 shows the number of illumination
sources turned on along the x-axis, and the overall luminance along the y-axis. FIG.
3 again provides an example utilizing 6 lamps as the illumination source, though any
illumination source and corresponding dimming circuitry may be employed.
[0032] The typical range of a prior art dimming method is illustrated in FIG. 3 as the range
from marker 300, with all lamps turned on at 100% illumination, to marker 304, where
all lamps are dimmed to 50% using the dimming circuitry. This results in a total illumination
range of approximately 50%.
[0033] Using the staggered dimming approach disclosed herein, the range of dimming is increased
from marker 300, with all lamps on at 100%, to marker 308, where two lamps are dimmed
to 50%, resulting in the ability to dim the display to approximately 16.7% of the
total luminance.
[0034] As will be appreciated from FIG. 3, the staggered dimming method first uses conventional
dimming methods to dim the display by 33% to approximately 66% of the total output
at marker 302. This level corresponds to the total luminance provided by the display
when the first set of two lamps is turned off. As mentioned throughout, this level
may be chosen depending on the type and/or number of illumination sources utilized.
[0035] When the first set of lamps is turned off, the dimming circuits then provide a range
of dimming from marker 302 to marker 306, extending from approximately 66% down to
approximately 33% of total output luminance. If it is desired to dim the display down
below 33%, the next set of lamps may be turned off, and the range of dimming extended
from marker 306 to marker 308, or approximately from 33% to approximately 16.7%.
[0036] While various embodiments and applications have been shown and described herein by
way of illustration only, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many
more modifications and improvements will suggest themselves to skilled persons having
the benefit of this disclosure without departing from the scope of the appended claims
and their equivalents.
1. A method of dimming a display having a plurality of illumination sources, said method
comprising:
illuminating the plurality of illumination sources to provide a first intensity level;
dimming said plurality of illumination sources to provide a predetermined intensity
level;
turning off a selected number of said plurality of illumination sources; and
raising the intensity level of said remaining illumination sources to provide approximately
said predetermined intensity level.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said first intensity level corresponds to the full
intensity capability of said display.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein said predetermined intensity level prior to turning
off a selected number of said plurality of information sources corresponds to a level
at which performance degradation of the display is avoided.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein said predetermined intensity level is approximately
66% of said plurality of illumination sources' output at full intensity.
5. The method of claim 3, wherein said predetermined intensity level is approximately
50% of said plurality of illuminations sources' output at full intensity.
6. The method of any preceding claim, wherein the ratio of said predetermined intensity
level to said first intensity level is approximately equal to the proportion of said
plurality of illumination sources that are turned off.
7. An apparatus for dimming a display having a plurality of illumination sources, said
method comprising:
means for illuminating the plurality of illumination sources to provide a first intensity
level;
means for dimming said plurality of illumination sources to provide a predetermined
intensity level;
means for turning off a selected number of said plurality of illumination sources;
and
means for raising the intensity level of said remaining illumination sources to provide
approximately said predetermined intensity level.
8. A program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions
executable by the machine to perform a method of dimming a display having a plurality
of illumination sources, said method comprising:
illuminating the plurality illumination sources to provide a first intensity level;
dimming said plurality of illumination sources to provide a predetermined intensity
level;
turning off a selected number of said plurality of illumination sources; and
raising the intensity level of said remaining illumination sources to provide approximately
said predetermined intensity level.
9. A program comprising instructions executable by a machine to perform a method of dimming
a display in accordance with any of claims 1 to 6.
10. A display apparatus comprising:
a transmissive pixel array operatively disposed in a housing;
a backlight system optically coupled to said array including a plurality of illumination
sources;
dimmer circuitry operatively coupled to said plurality of illumination sources, wherein
said dimmer circuitry is configured to illuminate the illumination sources to provide
a first intensity level; to dim said plurality of illumination sources to provide
a predetermined intensity level; to turn off a selected set of said plurality of illumination
sources; and to raise the intensity level of the remaining illumination sources to
provide approximately said predetermined intensity level.
11. The display of claim 10, wherein said plurality of illumination sources comprises
a plurality of CCFTs (Cold Cathode Fluorescent Tubes).
12. The display of claim 10 or 11, wherein the display is configured to decrease the total
luminance by a factor of n/m, where m is the total number of illumination sources,
and n is the number of illumination sources turned off.
13. The display of any of claims 10 to 12, wherein said predetermined intensity level
prior to turning off a selected number of said plurality of information sources corresponds
to a level at which performance degradation of components of the display is avoided.
14. The display of claim 13, wherein said predetermined intensity level is approximately
66% of said plurality of illumination sources' output.
15. The display of claim 13, wherein said predetermined intensity level is approximately
50% of said plurality of illumination sources' output.
16. The display of any of claims 10 to 15, wherein luminance of the display may be reduced
to less than 20% of the display's total luminance.
17. The display of any of claims 10 to 16, wherein said plurality of illumination sources
are arranged as pair sets located about said array.